Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
J Med Microbiol ; 73(7)2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39057747

ABSTRACT

The application of a One Health approach recognizes that human health, animal health, plant health and ecosystem health are intrinsically connected. Tackling complex challenges associated with foodborne zoonoses, antimicrobial resistance, and emerging threats is imperative. Therefore, the One Health European Joint Programme was established within the European Union research programme Horizon 2020. The One Health European Joint Programme activities were based on the development and harmonization of a One Health science-based framework in the European Union (EU) and involved public health, animal health and food safety institutes from almost all EU Member States, the UK and Norway, thus strengthening the cooperation between public, medical and veterinary organizations in Europe. Activities including 24 joint research projects, 6 joint integrative projects and 17 PhD projects, and a multicountry simulation exercise facilitated harmonization of laboratory methods and surveillance, and improved tools for risk assessment. The provision of sustainable solutions is integral to a One Health approach. To ensure the legacy of the work of the One Health European Joint Programme, focus was on strategic communication and dissemination of the outputs and engagement of stakeholders at the national, European and international levels.


Subject(s)
European Union , One Health , Humans , Animals , Public Health , Europe , Zoonoses/prevention & control , Communication , Food Safety
3.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 68(11): 2458-63, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23798670

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To comparatively investigate the resistance phenotypes and genotypes of various methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates from broilers at slaughter and workers at the respective poultry slaughterhouses. METHODS: Forty-six MRSA isolates (28 from broilers and 18 from humans) obtained at four different slaughterhouses were included. In addition to previously determined sequence types (STs) and spa types, the isolates were characterized by dru typing, SCCmec typing and PFGE. Resistance phenotypes were determined by broth microdilution. Resistance genes and clonal complexes (CCs) were detected by DNA microarray or specific PCR assays. RESULTS: MRSA of CC398, spa type t011 and varying dru types represented 23/28 broiler isolates and 12/18 human isolates. Three ST9/t1430/dt10a isolates were each seen among the isolates from the abattoir workers and the broilers. In addition, two human CC398/ST1453/t4652/dt3c isolates, a single human CC398/t034/dt6j isolate and two chicken CC398/t108/dt11a isolates were detected. All CC398 isolates (including ST1453) and some of the ST9 isolates from chickens and humans showed resistance to four to nine classes of antimicrobial agents and carried a wide range of resistance genes. While the resistance phenotypes and genotypes of the chicken isolates of the same flock were closely related, they usually differed from the resistance phenotypes and genotypes of the isolates from the workers at the respective slaughterhouse. CONCLUSIONS: The apparent homogeneity of MRSA isolates from the same flock suggests exchange of isolates between the respective animals. The apparent heterogeneity of MRSA isolates from abattoir workers might reflect their occupational contact with animals from numerous chicken flocks.


Subject(s)
Abattoirs , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/classification , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Occupational Exposure , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/veterinary , Animals , Chickens , Genotype , Humans , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/physiology , Microarray Analysis , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Molecular Typing , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , Phenotype , Polymerase Chain Reaction
4.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 68(9): 1970-3, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23657803

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Several studies on faecal carriage of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)/AmpC-producing Escherichia coli have been performed in cattle, but little is known about faecal carriage in veal calves. This study describes the prevalence and molecular characteristics of ESBL/AmpC genes in E. coli isolated from faecal samples of veal calves from 1997 to 2010. METHODS: Pooled faecal samples were inoculated using selective enrichment broth and subsequently selective MacConkey agar. All isolates with reduced susceptibility to cefotaxime were screened by PCR and sequencing analysis for the presence of ESBL/AmpC genes. RESULTS: The prevalence of E. coli with reduced susceptibility to cefotaxime showed a discontinuous increasing trend, ranging from 4% in 1998 and 1999 to 39% in 2010. Promoter mutations of the chromosomal ampC gene were present in all years. In 2000, ESBL genes blaCTX-M-1, blaTEM-52 and blaTEM-20 were first observed. Before 2005 the majority of E. coli with reduced susceptibility to cefotaxime harboured ampC promoter mutations. From 2005 onwards the majority harboured blaCTX-M genes, of which blaCTX-M-1 was the most abundant, followed by blaCTX-M-14 and blaCTX-M-15. The diversity of blaCTX-M genes gradually increased from one variant in 2000 to six variants in 2010. The prevalence of blaTEM-52 was relatively low, but it was detected from 2000 onwards. blaCMY and blaSHV were found sporadically. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence and molecular diversity of genes encoding cefotaxime resistance in E. coli isolated from veal calves over a 14 year period showed an increasing trend. From 2005 onwards, blaCTX-M genes were most abundant, especially blaCTX-M-1.


Subject(s)
Carrier State/veterinary , Escherichia coli Infections/veterinary , Escherichia coli/enzymology , Genetic Variation , beta-Lactamases/genetics , Animals , Bacteriological Techniques , Carrier State/epidemiology , Carrier State/microbiology , Cattle , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Feces/microbiology , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Prevalence , Sequence Analysis, DNA , beta-Lactamases/classification
5.
BMC Vet Res ; 8: 58, 2012 May 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22607475

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: ABSBACKGROUND: Since the detection of MRSA CC398 in pigs in 2004, it has emerged in livestock worldwide. MRSA CC398 has been found in people in contact with livestock and thus has become a public health issue. Data from a large-scale longitudinal study in two Danish and four Dutch pig herds were used to quantify MRSA CC398 transmission rates within pig herds and to identify factors affecting transmission between pigs. RESULTS: Sows and their offspring were sampled at varying intervals during a production cycle. Overall MRSA prevalence of sows increased from 33% before farrowing to 77% before weaning. Overall MRSA prevalence of piglets was>60% during the entire study period. The recurrent finding of MRSA in the majority of individuals indicates true colonization or might be the result of contamination. Transmission rates were estimated using a Susceptible-Infectious-Susceptible (SIS-)model, which resulted in values of the reproduction ratio (R0) varying from 0.24 to 8.08. Transmission rates were higher in pigs treated with tetracyclins and ß-lactams compared to untreated pigs implying a selective advantage of MRSA CC398 when these antimicrobials are used. Furthermore, transmission rates were higher in pre-weaning pigs compared to post-weaning pigs which might be explained by an age-related susceptibility or the presence of the sow as a primary source of MRSA CC398. Finally, transmission rates increased with the relative increase of the infection pressure within the pen compared to the total infection pressure, implying that within-pen transmission is a more important route compared to between-pen transmission and transmission through environmental exposure. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that MRSA CC398 is able to spread and persist in pig herds, resulting in an endemic situation. Transmission rates are affected by the use of selective antimicrobials and by the age of pigs.


Subject(s)
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/classification , Staphylococcal Infections/veterinary , Swine Diseases/microbiology , Animal Husbandry , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Denmark/epidemiology , Environmental Microbiology , Housing, Animal , Netherlands/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/transmission , Swine , Swine Diseases/epidemiology , Swine Diseases/transmission , Time Factors
6.
Vet Microbiol ; 155(2-4): 381-8, 2012 Mar 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21963419

ABSTRACT

Antimicrobial resistance in pigs becomes a public health issue when resistant organisms transfer from pigs to humans. Pigs are a large reservoir for livestock-associated (LA-)MRSA and people in contact with pigs are at risk for infection with LA-MRSA. Transmission and persistence of LA-MRSA within a pig population contributes to the maintenance of this zoonotic reservoir. Current knowledge on colonization and transmission of LA-MRSA in pigs is limited and mainly based on observational field surveys. Two experiments were performed to colonize pigs and quantify transmission of LA-MRSA between pigs. In the first experiment, colonization of six-week old piglets failed after intranasal inoculation, confirming the complexity of MRSA-colonization. In the second experiment, naive pigs got colonized after exposure to orally inoculated pigs. Subsequently, these contact-infected pigs transmitted MRSA to a new group of naive pigs. The reproduction ratio, R(0), was estimated with a SIS-model to quantify transmission between the first and second contact pigs as this resembles more the natural transmission. Two scenarios were evaluated, with different assumptions regarding infection status of individual pigs. R(0) varied between 3.7 and 4.3 and was significantly above 1, indicating a high probability of persistence of LA-MRSA, even without antimicrobial use.


Subject(s)
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Staphylococcal Infections/veterinary , Swine Diseases/transmission , Animals , Carrier State/microbiology , Disease Reservoirs , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/transmission , Swine , Swine Diseases/microbiology
7.
J Clin Microbiol ; 49(3): 1030-3, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21227986

ABSTRACT

The prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriage in pig and veal calf farmers in the Netherlands is estimated at 25 to 35%. However, no information is available about MRSA carriage in humans after short-term occupational exposure to pigs or veal calves. This study examines the prevalence and duration of MRSA acquisition after short-term intensive exposure to pigs or veal calves for persons not exposed to livestock on a daily basis. The study was performed with field workers who took samples from the animals or the animal houses in studies on MRSA prevalence in pig and veal farms. They were tested for MRSA by taking nasal samples before, directly after, and 24 h after they visited the farms. There were 199 sampling moments from visits to 118 MRSA-positive farms. Thirty-four of these visits (17%) resulted in the acquisition of MRSA. Thirty-one persons (94%) appeared negative again after 24 h. There were 62 visits to 34 MRSA-negative farms; none of the field workers acquired MRSA during these visits. Except for that from one person, all spa types found in the field workers were identical to those found in the animals or in the dust in animal houses and belonged to the livestock-associated clone. In conclusion, MRSA is frequently present after short-term occupational exposure, but in most cases the strain is lost again after 24 h.


Subject(s)
Carrier State/epidemiology , Carrier State/microbiology , Health Personnel , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Occupational Exposure , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Animals , Cattle , Humans , Livestock , Nasal Mucosa/microbiology , Netherlands/epidemiology , Prevalence , Swine , Zoonoses/microbiology , Zoonoses/transmission
8.
Vet J ; 189(3): 302-5, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20850359

ABSTRACT

The prevalence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in pigs at abattoirs is higher than in pigs sampled on farms. This study investigated whether MRSA negative pigs can become MRSA positive during transportation from the farm to the abattoir after exposure to other pigs and environmental sources of MRSA. Nasal swabs were collected from four batches of pigs during loading at the farm, on arrival at the abattoir and after stunning. Environmental wipes were taken from lorries after transporting pigs and from lairages after holding pigs. All pigs (n=117) tested MRSA negative before transportation. On arrival at the abattoir, 12/117 (10.3%) pigs in two batches tested MRSA positive. In lorries that tested positive after transportation, the prevalence of MRSA positive pigs was 21.1%, whereas no MRSA was detected in pigs that had been transported in lorries that tested negative after transportation. At stunning, all batches and 70/117 (59.8%) pigs tested MRSA positive. Pigs can become MRSA positive in the short period of time during transportation from the farm to stunning at the abattoir.


Subject(s)
Methicillin Resistance , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Staphylococcal Infections/veterinary , Swine Diseases/transmission , Abattoirs , Animals , Bacterial Typing Techniques/veterinary , Female , Genotype , Male , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/classification , Netherlands/epidemiology , Prevalence , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/transmission , Sus scrofa , Swine , Swine Diseases/epidemiology , Swine Diseases/microbiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL