Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage - patients retrospectively consent to fibrinolytic surgery despite poor neurological outcome and reduced health-related quality of life.

Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) might lead to devastating consequences. Nonetheless, subjective interpretation of life circumstances might vary. Recent data from ischemic stroke patients show that there might be a paradox between clinically rated neurological outcome and self-reported satisfaction with quality of life. Our hypothesis was that minimally invasive surgically treated ICH patients would still give their consent to stereotactic fibrinolysis despite experiencing relatively poor neurological outcome. In order to better understand the patients' perspective and to enhance insight beyond functional outcome, this is the first study assessing disease-specific health-related quality of life (hrQoL) in ICH after fibrinolytic therapy. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with spontaneous ICH treated minimally invasive by stereotactic fibrinolysis. Subsequently, using standardized telephone interviews, we evaluated functional outcome with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), health-related Quality of Life with the Quality of life after Brain Injury Overall scale (QOLIBRI-OS), and assessed retrospectively if the patients would have given their consent to the treatment. To verify the primary hypothesis that fibrinolytic treated ICH patients would still retrospectively consent to fibrinolytic therapy despite a relatively poor neurological outcome, we conducted a chi-square test to compare good versus poor outcome (mRS) between consenters and non-consenters. To investigate the association between hrQoL (QOLIBRI-OS) and consent, we conducted a Mann-Whitney U-test. Moreover, we did a Spearman correlation to investigate the correlation between functional outcome (mRS) and hrQoL (QOLIBRI-OS). The analysis comprised 63 data sets (35 men, mean age: 66.9 ± 11.8 years, median Hemphill score: 3 [2-3]). Good neurological outcome (mRS 0-3) was achieved in 52% (33/63) of the patients. Patients would have given their consent to surgery retrospectively in 89.7% (52/58). These 52 consenting patients comprised all 33 patients (100%) who achieved good functional outcome and 19 of the 25 patients (76%) who achieved poor neurological outcome (mRS 4-6). The mean QOLIBRI-OS value was 49.55 ± 27.75. A significant association between hrQoL and retrospective consent was found (p = 0.004). This study supports fibrinolytic treatment of ICH even in cases when poor neurological outcome would have to be assumed since subjective perception of deficits could be in contrast with the objectively measured neurological outcome. HrQoL serves as a criterion for success of rtPa lysis therapy in ICH.

Frequency and predictors of headache in the first 12 months after traumatic brain injury: results from CENTER-TBI.

BACKGROUND: Headache is a prevalent and debilitating symptom following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Large-scale, prospective cohort studies are needed to establish long-term headache prevalence and associated factors after TBI. This study aimed to assess the frequency and severity of headache after TBI and determine whether sociodemographic factors, injury severity characteristics, and pre- and post-injury comorbidities predicted changes in headache frequency and severity during the first 12 months after injury. METHODS: A large patient sample from the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) prospective observational cohort study was used. Patients were stratified based on their clinical care pathway: admitted to an emergency room (ER), a ward (ADM) or an intensive care unit (ICU) in the acute phase. Headache was assessed using a single item from the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire measured at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months after injury. Mixed-effect logistic regression analyses were applied to investigate changes in headache frequency and associated predictors. RESULTS: A total of 2,291 patients responded to the headache item at baseline. At study enrolment, 59.3% of patients reported acute headache, with similar frequencies across all strata. Female patients and those aged up to 40 years reported a higher frequency of headache at baseline compared to males and older adults. The frequency of severe headache was highest in patients admitted to the ICU. The frequency of headache in the ER stratum decreased substantially from baseline to 3 months and remained from 3 to 6 months. Similar trajectory trends were observed in the ICU and ADM strata across 12 months. Younger age, more severe TBI, fatigue, neck pain and vision problems were among the predictors of more severe headache over time. More than 25% of patients experienced headache at 12 months after injury. CONCLUSIONS: Headache is a common symptom after TBI, especially in female and younger patients. It typically decreases in the first 3 months before stabilising. However, more than a quarter of patients still experienced headache at 12 months after injury. Translational research is needed to advance the clinical decision-making process and improve targeted medical treatment for headache. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02210221.

Quality of life after brain injury-overall scale, Japanese version: assessment of reliability and validity.

This study analyzed the linguistic and psychometric validation of the Japanese version of the Quality of Life after Brain Injury-Overall Scale (QOLIBRI-OS) consisting of six items which cover several TBI-relevant domains. We hypothesized that the Japanese version has good reliability, convergent validity, and divergent validity, compared with its long version, the 37-item QOLIBRI. The QOLIBRI-OS Japanese version was forward and back-translated from the English version. In total, 129 individuals participated in this study after experiencing a traumatic brain injury and attending clinics, rehabilitation centers, and support centers in Japan. The structure of the QOLIBRI-OS was investigated by confirmatory factor analyses and compared with the QOLIBRI. Only one factor was extracted, and a model with one underlying factor had a good fit. The QOLIBRI-OS showed good-to-excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The QOLIBRI-OS was positively correlated with the QOLIBRI, Short Form Health Survey-36 version 2, and Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended, and negatively correlated with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. The results suggest that the QOLIBRI-OS Japanese version is a reliable and valid tool for assessing disease-specific health-related QOL in individuals after traumatic brain injury in Japan.