Correlating Predicted Adjuvant Therapy Benefit and Risk of Recurrence Between Breast Cancer Index (BCI) and the 21-Gene Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS).

INTRODUCTION: Breast Cancer Index (BCI) is a genomic assay that evaluates the benefit of extending endocrine therapy (ET) from 5 to 10 years and predicts recurrence risk (RR). We evaluated the association between BCI and Oncotype DX (ODX). PATIENTS: Women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive early-stage breast cancer (EBC) who had BCI and ODX performed were included. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of women with HR-positive EBC. BCI was categorized as predictive of extended ET versus not and ODX recurrence score (RS) as low (0-10), intermediate (11-25), and high (26-100). Univariate and multivariable logistic and linear regression models assessed the relationship between BCI and ODX, factors associated with each, and discordance between scores. RESULTS: We identified 153 women, 22% were premenopausal and 18% were lymph node positive. The univariate logistic and linear models revealed an association between BCI predictive score and ODX RS (OR 7.84, CI, 2.63-23.36, P < .001) and log of BCI RR (Beta 0.04, CI, 0.02-0.06, P < .001). Seventy-four percent of BCI predictive scores were concordant with ODX RS and 83% of BCI RR was concordant with ODX RR. In a univariate logistic regression model, BCI predictive of ET benefit was associated with discordance (OR 28.00, CI, 10.58-74.02, P < .001). Higher ODX RR was associated with discordance (OR 1.92, CI, 1.42-2.59, P < .001). CONCLUSION: We found a significant association between ODX and BCI predictive and prognostic scores. BCI predictive of extended ET benefit was associated with discordance with ODX RS. Higher predicted RR on ODX was associated with discordance with BCI predicted RR.

Clinicopathological characteristics and genomic profiling of pure mucinous breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Pure mucinous breast cancer (PMC) is a rare histological type with a favourable prognosis. However, cases with recurrence have been reported and diagnosed in clinical practice. The mechanisms underlying PMC recurrence remain unknown. In this study, we aimed to identify the prognostic factors associated with PMC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 166 patients diagnosed with PMC were included. We compared the clinicopathological characteristics between patients with and without recurrence. The 21-gene assay was performed in 10 patients with recurrence and 20 TNM stage-matched patients without recurrence. Whole-exon sequencing was performed in 12 PMC primary tumours and four positive lymph nodes (LNs). RESULTS: Tumour size, lymph node status and TNM staging differed significantly between recurrent group and non-recurrent group. And the 21-gene recurrence scores did not differ significantly between recurrent group and its TNM stage-matched non-recurrent group. The most frequently mutated genes in the primary tumours of regional LN-positive PMCs were ADCY10 (3/6) and SHANK3 (3/6), and they more recurrently harboured gains of 15q23, 17q23.2 and 20p11.21, and loss of 21p11.2. And these alterations were not detected in primary tumours of regional LN-negative PMCs. CONCLUSION: TNM stage is an important prognostic factor in PMC. Although we revealed that regional LN-positive PMCs show increased occurrence of duplication variants at 15q23, 17q23.2 and 20p11.21, and deletion variants at 21p11.2. Further investigation, including multi-omics studies, are needed and may provide additional insights into the nature of PMC.

Correlation between postoperative treatment selection and prognosis determined using the Oncotype DX® test data: a retrospective multicenter study in Japan.

PURPOSE: Oncotype DX® is a frequently used multigene assay for hormone receptor-positive breast cancers. However, limited evidence is available regarding its application in Japan owing to the lack of insurance coverage. Therefore, we conducted this large-scale, retrospective study by collecting data from nine Japanese institutes and assessed postoperative treatment choice and prognosis by using Oncotype DX®. METHODS: Six hundred thirty-two patients who underwent breast surgery and whose recurrence score (RS) data were available were included. They were divided into RS 0-25 and RS ≥ 26 groups. The groups were compared in terms of clinicopathological factors, treatment options, and prognosis. RESULTS: After the median follow-up period of 10.1 years, the disease-free survival (DFS) rates were significantly better in the RS 0-25 group (p = 0.02). Per the recurrent event type, there was no significant intergroup difference in locoregional recurrence (p = 0.139). However, a trend toward better distant DFS was observed in the RS 0-25 group (p = 0.08). Overall survival was also significantly better in this group (p = 0.027). Considering chemotherapy use, DFS worsened among chemotherapy-treated patients with an RS of 0-25 and those with an RS ≥ 26 who did not receive chemotherapy (p < 0.001). Seven (1.35%) chemotherapy-treated patients with an RS of 0-25 showed disease recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents the largest database-derived prognostic data in Japanese patients, utilizing the Oncotype DX® treatment selection. Further studies are needed to determine the impact on treatment choice, considering the clinical risk, and the need for additional postoperative treatment.

Nomogram Update to Predict the High Genomic Risk Breast Cancer by Different Races.

PURPOSE: To develop a nomogram to predict the high-risk recurrence score (RS) and to customize the nomogram for different races in early-stage hormone receptor (HoR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer. METHODS: Patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 were included from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results oncotype DX database. The nomogram was assessed with a receiver operating characteristic curve to measure the area under the curve (AUC) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The nomogram was developed and internally validated for discrimination and calibration, and then validated in different races. RESULTS: A total of 48,464 patients were included and randomly assigned to the training cohort (n = 36370, 75.0%) and validation cohort (n = 12,094, 25.0%). Patients in the training cohort were identified to develop the nomogram, including 32,683 (89.9%) White women, 3135 (8.6%) Black women, and 552 (1.5%) Chinese women. Five independent predictive factors for high-risk RS were included to develop the nomogram, including tumor grade, progesterone receptor status, histological subtype, race, and tumor stage. The AUC was 0.696 (95% CI, 0.682-0.710) in the training cohort and 0.700 (95% CI, 0.676-0.724) in the validation cohort. There was no significant difference between the training cohort and the validation cohort. When validating the nomogram classified by race, the AUC was 0.694 (95% CI, 0.682-0.706) for the White cohort, 0.708 (95% CI, 0.673-0.743) for the Black cohort, and 0.653 (95% CI, 0.565-0.741) for the Chinese cohort. CONCLUSION: The developed nomogram for predicting high-risk RS is available for different races in patients with HoR+/HER2- breast cancer, which could be used as qualified surrogates before ordering the 21-gene RS testing.

Association of tumor immune microenvironment profiling and 21-gene recurrence assay in early breast cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) plays a vital role in breast cancer development, treatment resistance, and prognosis. This study evaluates the association of TIME profiling and 21-gene recurrence score (RS) in early Luminal breast cancer patients. METHODS: ER+ /HER2-, pN0 breast cancer patients with available RS results who received surgery between January 2009 and December 2013 were enrolled. TIME markers, including stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), CD3, CD4, CD8, and tumor PD-L1 expression, were comprehensively analyzed. Association of TIME markers with RS, as well as their correlation with breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were tested. RESULTS: Overall, 385 patients were included, of whom 341 (88.6%) had TILs ≤10%. TIME markers were positively but moderately correlated with each other (Spearman r 0.28-0.53, all P < 0.05). Continuous RS showed a weak correlation with continuous TILs, CD3, CD8, and PD-L1. Regarding single gene mRNA level in the 21-gene RS panel, higher expression of TIME markers was related to lower ER group genes expression, but higher proliferation and invasion group genes level. After a median follow-up of 91.67 (range 5.03-134.03) months, TILs (P = 0.049) and PD-L1 (P = 0.034) were inversely associated with BCSS. CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer TIME markers, including TILs, CD3, CD4, CD8, and PD-L1, were correlated with 21-gene RS score. Lower expression of ER group genes, as well as higher expression of proliferation and invasion group genes were associated with a higher level of these TIME markers, warranting further exploration.

Validation of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay in Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer and 0 to 3 Positive Lymph Nodes: Risk Pattern and Outcomes on a Community Level.

Introduction: The aim of the present study was to analyze the performance of Oncotype DX® multigene assay (ODX®) in patients with 0-3 lymph nodes in a high-volume community hospital. Methods: Patients with non-metastatic HR*/HER2- EBC and 0-3 positive lymph nodes, who underwent primary surgery at the Red Cross Hospital Munich, Germany and consecutively had ODX® testing were included in this retrospective study. The distribution of clinicopathologic characteristics, recurrence score (RS) risk, and use of systemic therapy were compared among patients without positive lymph nodes (N0) and patients with micrometastases or 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes (N1). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated. Results: From 2012 to 2017 ODX® was consecutively performed in 575 (16.4%) of 3,492 women with HR*/HER- EBC, of which 553 were eligible for this analysis (N0: 60.8%; N1: 39.2%). Among the patients included, 441 (79.7%) had an RS of 0 to 25 and 112 (20.3%) had an RS of 26 or higher. In patients with RS 0 to 25 the rate of chemotherapy use was low, independent from nodal status (N0: 17.1% and N1: 19.1%) and 5-year DFS was 90.5% and 91.7% for N0 and N1 patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in DFS (90.5% vs. 93.3%; p = 0.101) or OS (97.2% vs. 96.0%; p = 0.737) for patients with an RS of 0 to 25 when treated with chemo-endocrine therapy or endocrine therapy alone, independent from nodal status. Conclusions: The results of the study confirm the observations from randomized studies on the use of the ODX® in a real-world population in terms of risk distribution and patient outcome. Adjuvant chemotherapy could be safely omitted in patients with HR*/HER2- breast cancer with 0-3 positive lymph nodes and RS <25.

Clinical Utility of Genomic Assay in Node-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy among women in Canada. Adjuvant treatment in early BC can reduce the risk of BC recurrence. Historically, the decision for adjuvant chemotherapy for early BC was made only based on clinical and tumour characteristics. In recent years, there has been an effort toward developing genomic assays as a predictive and prognostic tool to improve precision in estimating disease recurrence, sensitivity to systemic treatment and ultimately with clinical utility for guidance regarding adjuvant systemic treatment(s). There are various commercial genomic tests available for early-stage ER+/HER-2 negative BC. This paper will review the Oncotype DX 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS), MammaPrint, EndoPredict, Prosigna®, and Breast Cancer Index (BCI) genomic assays. We will also focus on these genomic assays' clinical application and utility in node-positive early-stage BC based on the most recent evidence and guidance recommendations.

21-Gene recurrence score predictive for prognostic benefit of radiotherapy in patients age ≥ 70 with T1N0 ER/PR + HER2- breast cancer treated with breast conserving surgery and endocrine therapy.

PURPOSE: Based on the results of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 9343 trial, patients age ≥70 with T1N0 hormone receptor positive (ER/PR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer who are treated with breast conserving surgery (BCS) and endocrine therapy (ET) are candidates for omission of radiotherapy (RT). Because the CALGB 9343 trial did not stratify based on recurrence score (RS) test (Oncotype Dx), we conducted the present retrospective study to determine whether RS is predictive of who may benefit from RT following BCS in this cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried (2004-2017) for patients age ≥ 70 with pT1N0 ER+/PR + HER2- breast cancer treated with BCS and ET. Patients were stratified based on their RS (low risk [LR] = 1-10, intermediate risk [IR] = 11-25, high risk [HR] = 26-99). Propensity score matching (PSM) created 1:1 matched cohorts of patients who received radiotherapy and those who did not. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS). Univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) Cox proportional hazard analyses identified clinical and treatment factors prognostic for OS. RESULTS: A total of 11,891 patients met the selection criteria: 3364 in the LR cohort, 7305 in the IR cohort, and 1222 in the HR cohort. A total of 79 % received RT: 77 % in the LR cohort, 79 % in the IR cohort, and 85 % in the HR cohort. Because PSM could not be efficiently performed in the HR cohort alone, the IR and HR cohort were merged (IRHR) for matching. After PSM, the 5-year OS in the LR cohort was 91 % for those who received RT and 89 % for those who did not (p = 0.605). In the IRHR cohort, the 5-year OS was 91 % for those who received RT and 87 % for those who did not (p = 0.003). On MVA in the LR cohort, RT (p = 0.727) was not predictive of improved OS. On MVA in the IRHR cohort, RT (p = 0.010) was a positive prognostic factor for OS. CONCLUSION: In this older cohort of patients, there is an OS benefit with the use of RT in patients with IRHR RS but not in patients with LR RS. Pending prospective evaluation, assessment of RS in this older subset of patients is recommended with consideration of RT when RS is ≥11.

Racial differences in predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay: a population-based study using the SEER database.

PURPOSE: The 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay is currently used for predicting chemotherapeutic benefits for hormone receptor-positive (HR +) early-stage breast cancer patients without consideration regarding racial differences in that predictive value. This study aimed at demonstrating racial differences in the predictive values of the 21-gene RS assay. METHODS: The study cohort was selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM) was compared between patients who received chemotherapy (the "CTx group") and those who did not (the "no CTx group") to estimate the predictive value of the assay. This comparison was repeated for each racial group. RESULTS: Among 88,498 T1 - 2N0 HR + breast cancer patients who had results of 21-gene RS, 13,123 patients had RS > 25, which included 10,697 Whites, 1282 Blacks, and 1,144 Asian Americans/Pacific Islanders (AAPIs). Chemotherapy was administered to 8364 patients (63.4%). The adjusted hazard ratio for BCSM in the CTx group (vs. no CTx group) was 0.734 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.588-0.917) in Whites, 0.748 (95% CI 0.428-1.307) in Blacks, and 1.343 (95% CI 0.558-3.233) in AAPIs. No subgroup within patients with RS > 25 among non-White women showed a significant predictive value of the 21-gene RS assay, except for Black women with grade 3 tumors. CONCLUSION: The predictive value of the 21-gene RS assay for assessing chemotherapy benefit was validated in White women based on the SEER database, although the predictive value was not warranted in non-White women.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma and use of the 21-gene recurrence score: A National Cancer Database analysis.

BACKGROUND: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is traditionally considered less responsive to chemotherapy. Although the Oncotype recurrence score (RS) has been validated to identify high-risk patients who benefit from chemotherapy, some studies have questioned its relevance in patients with ILC. The objective of this study was to better characterize potential use of the RS in these patients. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was used to identify women with stage I through III, T1 through T3, N0 or N1, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative ILC or invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) who had an available RS between 2010 and 2016. Multivariable Cox regression was used to model the effect of variables on 5-year overall survival (OS). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS according to the RS, nodal status, and chemotherapy. RESULTS: In total, 15,763 patients with ILC and 100,070 with IDC were identified. The mean age of patients with ILC and IDC was 59.2 ± 9.1 and 57.2 ± 9.8, respectively. A lower percentage of patients with ILC versus those with IDC had a high RS, defined as >25 (6.6% vs 16.0%; P < .0001). ILC patients with a high RS who had N0 or N1 disease received approximately 10% less chemotherapy compared with similar patients who had IDC. The results indicated that the RS had statistically significant prognostic value for patients with ILC. In addition, an absolute OS advantage was correlated with the receipt of chemotherapy by patients with ILC who had a high RS with N0 or N1 disease. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ILC who have a high RS are treated less often with chemotherapy compared with similar patients who have IDC. Nevertheless, the RS has a prognostic as well as a predictive value in ILC, with an association between OS benefit and chemotherapy receipt in patients who have ILC with a high RS, especially if they have N1 disease. LAY SUMMARY: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is a subtype of breast cancer comprising about 15% of cases. The Oncotype recurrence score (RS) is a genetic test of breast tumors that helps predict which patients might benefit from chemotherapy. Some have doubted the relevance of the RS for patients with ILC. In this study, the authors show that the RS is relevant for patients who have ILC. The RS has the potential of predicting the risk of recurrence and identifying patients with ILC who might benefit from chemotherapy.

Oncotype DX 21-gene test has a low recurrence score in both pure and mixed mucinous breast carcinoma.

The Oncotype DX 21-gene test can be used to predict chemotherapy efficacy in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer; however, the data on the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) for mucinous breast carcinoma (MBC) are limited. The present study aimed to evaluate the distribution pattern and clinical value of the 21-gene RS in patients with MBC. A total of 38 pure MBC (PMBC) and 11 mixed MBC (MMBC) cases were retrospectively analyzed, and a total of 29 ER-positive and HER2-negative MBCs underwent the Oncotype DX 21-gene test. There were no statistically significant differences between the PMBCs and MMBCs in age, tumor size and molecular subtype; however, patients with MMBC showed a significantly higher incidence rate of nodal metastases compared with that in patients with PMBC (72.7 vs. 16.2%, respectively). Following surgery, 87.8 and 59.2% of the enrolled patients received endocrine therapy and chemotherapy, respectively. With a median follow-up of 65.6 months, the 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 97.0 and 100.0%, respectively. The 21-gene test revealed that the proportions of patients with MBC categorized into low (RS <18), intermediate (RS ≥18-30) and high (RS ≥30) risk groups were 51.7, 44.8 and 3.5%, respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference between the PMBC and MMBC cases. Notably, among the genes in the 21-gene RS testing, the expression levels of cathepsin V, progesterone receptor (PR) and CD68 were significantly higher in the PMBC group compared with that in the MMBC group. In conclusion, the current study demonstrated that patients with MBC had a favorable prognosis, and both PMBC and MMBC cases had a low- and intermediate-risk RS, which suggests that a considerable proportion of patients may be able to avoid chemotherapy. In addition, the high expression level of PR, based on the 21-gene test in PMBCs, indicated that they may have a more favorable response to endocrine therapy than MMBCs.

21-Gene Recurrence Assay Associated With Favorable Metabolic Profiles in HR-Positive, HER2-Negative Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients.

Background: Comprehensive investigations of the associations between 21-gene recurrence assay and metabolic profiles in Chinese breast cancer patients are limited. Methods: We evaluated the relations of the 21-gene recurrence risk score (RS) and the expression of cancer-related genes with metabolic factors and biomarkers of insulin and the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) axis, and examined the interactions between the 21-gene RS and these metabolic profiles on breast cancer recurrence in Chinese women with HR-positive, HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer. Results: The 21-gene RS was inversely associated with body mass index ([BMI]ß: -0.178 kg/m2; P=0.040), the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance index ([HOMA-IR] ß: -0.031; P=0.042), insulin (ß: -0.036 uIU/ml; P=0.009), and C-peptide (ß: -0.021 ug/L; P=0.014) and was positively associated with high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (ß: 0.025 mmol/L; P=0.004), which were driven by the relation patterns between specific cancer-related genes and these metabolic profiles. Each 10-unit increase in the 21-gene RS was associated with 28% (95% CI: 5-47%) higher risk of breast cancer recurrence; this association was also observed in patients with favorable metabolic profiles in relevant to an absence of obesity, insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, hypertension, or dyslipidemia (28-44% higher risk) and among women with a low level of insulin, C-peptide, or the IGF1/IGFBP3 ratio (41-155% higher risk). Conclusions: The 21-gene RS was related to favorable metabolic profiles including lower BMI, HOMA-IR, insulin, and C-peptide, and higher HDL in Chinese breast cancer patients, and its prognostic impact on breast cancer recurrence was more likely to present among patients with relatively favorable metabolic profiles.

Application of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Patients with Early HR-Positive/HER2-Negative Breast Cancer: Chemotherapy and Survival Rate According to Clinical Risk.

We assessed the impact of 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) assay on chemotherapy decision-making according to binary clinical risk stratification in patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative early breast cancer. We included patients with tumors measuring 1-5 cm, N0-1, and HR+/HER2- breast cancer who underwent surgery followed by adjuvant treatment. The clinical risk was determined by a modified version of Adjuvant! Online. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) according to the application of 21-gene RS separately in the low and high clinical risk groups. Before PSM, 342 (39.0%) of 878 patients were classified as having high clinical risk. In the high clinical risk group, 21-gene RS showed a significantly reduced chemotherapy rate of 39.3%, without increasing the recurrence. After PSM, the 21-gene RS application significantly reduced chemotherapy rate by 34.0% in 200 patients with high clinical risk (21-gene RS application, 32.0% vs. no 21-gene RS application, 66.0%, p < 0.001). There was also no significant difference in RFS according to 21-gene RS status in the high clinical risk group (log-rank test, p = 0.467). These results support the usefulness of the 21-gene RS to reduce the chemotherapy rate without adversely affecting prognosis in a high clinical risk group.

Análise de custo-efetividade de um painel genético no câncer de mama precoce na saúde suplementar brasileira / Cost-effectiveness analysis of a genetic panel in early breast cancer in Brazilian supplementary health

Objetivo: Avaliar o custo-efetividade do uso de um painel genético de 21 genes em pacientes adultas diagnosticadas com câncer de mama em estádio inicial em uma operadora de saúde com mais de 500.000 vidas. Métodos: Foi utilizada uma coorte prospectiva seguida de um estudo de custo-efetividade entre os pacientes que utilizaram Oncotype DX® em 2020. Calcularam-se as despesas totais de cada esquema de quimioterapia (QT), somando-se os custos dos produtos e taxas de infusão. Resultados: Das 35 pacientes que utilizaram o teste de 21 genes no período avaliado, 60% (n = 21) não necessitaram de QT. Quando aplicadas simulações, houve custo evitado de R$ -1.945.448,88 (custos incrementais potenciais de R$ -6.488.207,56 até R$ 443.485,26, dependendo do esquema de QT escolhido). Conclusão: A inserção do teste de 21 genes na jornada do tratamento de câncer de mama na saúde suplementar evidenciou significativa relevância, pois contribuiu com o uso adequado da terapêutica, garantindo a sustentabilidade do sistema de saúde. Apresentando-se como uma opção custo-efetiva para a maioria dos esquemas de QT em comparação com a sua não utilização no tratamento, para a saúde suplementar brasileira

Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the use of a genetic panel of 21 genes in adult patients diagnosed with early stage breast cancer in a healthcare provider with more than 500,000 lives. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted, followed by cost-effectiveness, among patients who used Oncotype DX® , in 2020. The total costs of each chemotherapy scheme (QT) were calculated, adding the costs of the products and infusion fees. Results: Of the 35 patients who used 21 gene tests in the evaluation period, 60% (n = 21) did not require QT. When simulations were applied, there was an avoided cost of R$ -1.945.448,88 (Potentials incremental costs from -R$ 6.488.207,56 to +R$ 443.485,26, depending on the chosen QT scheme). Conclusion: The insertion of 21-Gene recurrence score in the breast cancer treatment journey in supplementary health showed significant relevance, as it contributes to the appropriate use of therapy, guaranteeing the sustainability of the health system. Presenting itself as a cost-effective option for most QT schemes compared to not being used in treatment, for Brazilian supplementary health System

Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy stratified by age and the 21-gene recurrence score in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The 21-gene recurrence score (RS) can predict chemotherapy benefit in estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative (ER+/HER2-) early breast cancer patients. Age would influence the interaction between RS and chemotherapy effect. The current study aimed to determine RS thresholds which were predictive of chemotherapy benefit in young and old women, respectively. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with pN0-1, ER+/HER2- breast cancer between 2009 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching was performed according to chemotherapy usage. After stratifying patients with different cutoffs of age, the RS threshold indicating chemotherapy benefit in each age strata were determined by cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: A total of 1227 patients were included. The median age was 58 years and the median RS was 24. After matching, the RS thresholds suggesting chemotherapy benefit varied with age. For patients ≤55 years, chemotherapy benefit was observed in those having RS > 25 (P = 0.03), with 4-year invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) of 97.0 and 89.3% in patients receiving chemotherapy or not. While patients derived no benefit from chemotherapy if they had RS ≤25 (P = 0.66, 4-year IDFS: 95.3% vs. 94.6%). For patients > 55 years, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with better prognosis in those with RS > 36 (P = 0.014, 4-year IDFS: 94.7% vs. 76.2%), but not in those having RS ≤36 (P = 0.13, 4-year IDFS: 92.3% vs. 95.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Old patients need higher RS thresholds to demonstrate the chemotherapy benefit. Further efforts are warranted to investigate the association between age and predictive RS thresholds.

Prognostic value of the 21-gene recurrence score for regional recurrence in patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic value of the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) for regional recurrence (RR) in patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 446 patients who underwent 21-gene RS assay after breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy. The high-RS group was defined as patients who were (1) older than 50 years with an RS of 26 or higher, or (2) 50 years or younger with an RS of 16 or higher. RESULTS: The 5-year rates of local recurrence (LR), RR, and distant metastasis (DM) were 2.2%, 2.7%, and 4.7%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 99.1%. Of the patients, 269 (60.3%) had low-RS, while 177 (39.7%) had high-RS. The 5-year OS rate of the high-RS group was significantly lower than that of the low-RS. The 5-year rates of RR and DM in the high-RS group were significantly higher than those in the low-RS group, while the LR rates did not differ significantly. In multivariable analysis, the high-RS group had a significant relationship with increased RR rate (p = 0.037). Patients who had both high-RS and clinical high-risk features had a significantly higher 5-year RR rate (7.9%) compared with other groups. CONCLUSIONS: High-RS was an independent risk factor for RR. The significantly higher RR rate of patients with both high-RS and clinical high-risk features compared with other groups suggests that this patient group can be a potential candidate for regional nodal irradiation.

A nomogram to predict the high-risk RS in HR+/HER2-breast cancer patients older than 50 years of age.

BACKGROUND: The 21-gene recurrence score (RS) testing can predict the prognosis for luminal breast cancer patients. Meanwhile, patients > 50 years with RS > 25 have improved survival with adjuvant chemotherapy. The current study aimed to develop a nomogram with routine parameters to predict RS. METHODS: We included patients diagnosed with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative who underwent the 21-gene RS testing and aged > 50 years. The primary outcome was high-risk RS (> 25). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify significant predictors. A predictive nomogram based on logistic model was developed and evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The nomogram was internally validated for discrimination and calibration with bootstrapping method, and externally validated in another cohort. We then assessed the nomogram in different subgroups of patients and compared it with several published models. RESULTS: A total of 1100 patients were included. Five clinicopathological parameters were used as predictors of a high-risk RS, including tumor grade, histologic subtype, ER expression, PR expression, and Ki-67 index. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.798 (95% CI 0.772-0.825) and optimism adjusted AUC was 0.794 (95% CI 0.781-0.822). External validation demonstrated an AUC value of 0.746 (95% CI 0.685-0.807), which had no significant difference with the training cohort (P = 0.124). Calibration plots indicated that the nomogram-predicted results were well fitted to the actual outcomes in both internal and external validation. The nomogram had better discriminate ability in patients who had tumors > 2 cm (AUC = 0.847, 95% CI 0.804-0.890). When compared with four other existing models, similar AUC was observed between our nomogram and the model constructed by discriminate Lee et al. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a user-friendly nomogram to predict the high-risk RS in luminal breast cancer patients who were older than 50 years of age, which could guide treatment decision making for those who have no access to the 21-gene RS testing.

Distribution and influence of the 21-gene recurrence score on chemotherapy decision-making in special type of breast cancer.

The 21-gene recurrence score (RS) testing could guide treatment for luminal breast cancer with the histological non-special type (NST). However, there is limited data on its role in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) or other special types (ST). In the current study, we retrospectively included patients with the 21-gene RS testing between Jan. 2009 and Dec. 2017 and compared the RS distribution as well as gene expression levels among NST, ILC, and other ST with favorable prognosis. Adjuvant chemotherapy usage, clinical outcomes, and decision-making change due to RS testing were also analyzed. A total of 1736 patients were included: 1511 (87.0%) patients with NST, 79 (4.6%) with ILC, and 146 (8.4%) with ST. The median RS was 25 and 25 in the NST and ILC groups, which was 22 in the ST group (P=0.001). Compared with NST, ILC had almost similar expression of the cancer-related genes, while ST had lower expression of genes involved in the proliferation group. The rate of adjuvant chemotherapy usage was 6.7%, 38.1%, and 54.5% for ILC patients, and was 7.1%, 15.8%, and 17.8% for ST patients in the low- (RS<18), intermediate- (RS18-30), and high-risk (RS>30) RS groups, both of which were lower than that for NST patients. RS was associated with chemotherapy usage in NST patients but not in ILC or ST patients by multivariant analysis. After the testing, 20.5% of patients with NST had changes in chemotherapy decision-making, which is 21.5% in ILC patients and 16.4% in ST patients (P=0.490). Furthermore, the prognostic value of RS was only observed in NST cohort but not in ILC or ST patients. In conclusion, ST had lower RS than NST and ILC, which were mainly due to the lower expression of genes in the proliferation group. The 21-gene RS results were associated with chemotherapy usage in the NST groups, while its role in ILC and ST patients deserve to be further studied.

The 21-gene recurrence score in node-positive, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer: a cautionary tale from an NCDB analysis.

PURPOSE: The 21-gene recurrence score assay (RS) has not been prospectively validated to predict adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-), node-positive breast cancer patients. Nevertheless, de-escalation based on RS has been demonstrated and partially advocated by retrospective data. The purpose of this study was to identify subgroups of node-positive patients with low to intermediate RS who still benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was used to identify 28,591 women with stage I-III, T1-T3, N1, HR+, HER2- breast cancer and a RS ≤ 25 between 2010 and 2016. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify variables correlating with chemotherapy use and 5-year survival. Subgroup analysis was performed to discern patients in whom the use of adjuvant chemotherapy correlated with better survival. RESULTS: A 35% decline in chemotherapy use was observed from 2010 to 2016. Patients with younger age, higher RS, larger tumors and more positive lymph nodes, and those treated by mastectomy, axillary lymph node dissection and radiation, were more likely to receive chemotherapy. Chemotherapy use was associated with an improved 5-year survival (HR = 1.63, 95% CI 1.28-2.07). Upon subgroup analysis, this association was lost in patients > 70 years and those with a RS ≤ 11, while patients ≤ 70 with a RS of 12-25 treated with chemotherapy had an absolute 5-year survival advantage of 3.0% (HR = 1.91, 95% CI 1.42-2.57). CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be cautious when considering omission of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients ≤ 70 years, with HR+, HER2-, N1 tumors and a RS 12-25, at least until the results of the anticipated RxPONDER trial become available.

Genomic expression assay testing among American Indian and Alaska Native women with breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer mortality for all women, including American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) women. The use of the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) appears to be predictive of the benefit of chemotherapy for women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. The objective of the current study was to compare RS testing between AI/AN and non-Hispanic White (NHW) women with breast cancer. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program was used to identify women with ER-positive breast cancer from 2004 through 2015. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with RS use, with high-risk RS, and with chemotherapy use among those with a high-risk RS. RESULTS: A total of 363,387 NHW patients and 1951 AI/AN patients with ER-positive breast cancer were identified. AI/AN women were found to be less likely to undergo RS testing and, when tested, were more likely to have a high-risk RS. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, AI/AN women were found to be significantly more likely to have a high-risk RS (odds ratio,1.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.66). Among untested women, chemotherapy use was higher for AI/AN women; however, the use of chemotherapy was not found to be significantly different between the groups with a high-risk RS. Using Cox proportional hazards models, AI/AN race was found to be significantly associated with worse overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: AI/AN women were less likely to undergo RS testing compared with NHW women and were more likely to have a high-risk RS. Reversing the disparity in genomic expression assay testing is critical to ensure guideline-based breast cancer treatment and improve survival rates for AI/AN women with breast cancer.