The Impact of Anti-Amyloid Immunotherapies on Stroke Care.

Anti-amyloid immunotherapies have recently emerged as treatments for Alzheimer's disease. While these therapies have demonstrated efficacy in clearing amyloid-ß and slowing cognitive decline, they have also been associated with amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) which include both edema (ARIA-E) and hemorrhage (ARIA-H). Given that ARIA have been associated with significant morbidity in cases of antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy, an understanding of mechanisms of and risk factors for ARIA is of critical importance for stroke care. We discuss the latest data regarding mechanisms of ARIA, including the role of underlying cerebral amyloid angiopathy, and implications for ischemic stroke prevention and management.

Risk factors in developing amyloid related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) and clinical implications.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) affects over 6 million people over the age of 65. The advent of new anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies as treatment for early Alzheimer's disease these immunotherapeutics may slow disease progression but also pose significant risks. Amyloid related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) identified on MRI following administration of these new monoclonal antibodies can cause both brain edema (ARIA-E) and hemorrhage (ARIA-H). While most ARIA is asymptomatic, some patients can develop headache, confusion, nausea, dizziness, seizures and in rare cases death. By analyzing lecanemab, aducanumab, gantenerumab, donanemab, and bapineuzumab clinical trials; risk factors for developing ARIA can be identified to mitigate some of the ARIA risk. Risk factors for developing ARIA-E are a positive Apoε4 carrier status and prior multiple cerebral microhemorrhages. Risk factors for ARIA-H are age, antithrombotic use, and history of prior strokes. With lecanemab, ARIA-E and ARIA-H were seen at lower rates 12 and 17%, respectively, compared to aducanumab (ARIA-E 35% and ARIA-H 19%) in treated patients. ARIA risk factors have impacted inclusion and exclusion criteria, determining who can receive lecanemab. In some clinics, almost 90% of Alzheimer's patients are excluded from receiving these new anti-amyloid therapeutics. This review aims to discuss risk factors of ARIA and highlight important areas for further research. With more anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies approved by the Food and Drug Administration, considering patient risk factors for developing ARIA is important to identify to minimize patient's risk while receiving these new therapies.

Acute cholangitis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccine booster in a patient receiving an anti-amyloid antibody for Alzheimer's disease: A case report.

A 77-year-old woman had 2 weeks of fever and flu-like symptoms starting several hours after receiving an mRNA booster for SARS-CoV-2 and the influenza vaccine, in separate shots. Laboratory tests showed cholangitis. Medical history included APOE-ε4 carrier genotype, mild Alzheimer's disease, participation in a clinical trial of aducanumab, and resolving polymyalgia rheumatica. The patient recovered with at-home supportive care. She had aducanumab-associated amyloid-related imaging abnormalities-edema (ARIA-E) both before and after the acute cholangitis. Two months following the vaccinations polymyalgia rheumatica recurred. This case raises questions about interactions among immune-mediated disease, complications of anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies, and adverse events following SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination.

Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities: An Update.

Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) is a term introduced in 2010 to encompass a spectrum of MRI findings observed in patients receiving investigational anti-amyloid beta (Aß) immunotherapies for Alzheimer disease (AD). The entity can be broadly categorized into ARIA characterized by edema and effusion (ARIA-E) and ARIA characterized by microhemorrhages and superficial siderosis (ARIA-H). ARIA typically occurs early in the treatment course and has a higher incidence in patients who are apolipoprotein E ε4 allele carriers. ARIA-E has an additional dose dependence, with higher incidence in patients receiving higher doses of anti-Aß immuno-therapies. ARIA is often asymptomatic and self-resolving. The recognition of ARIA has implications for patient selection and monitoring for Aß immunotherapies, and its development can potentially lead to a pause or discontinuation of therapy. The FDA's first approval of an Aß-targeting monoclonal antibody for AD treatment in 2021 will lead to such therapy's expanded use beyond the clinical trial setting and to radiologists more commonly encountering ARIA in clinical practice. This review explores the theorized pathophysiologic mechanisms for ARIA, describes the MRI findings and grading schemes for ARIA-E and AREA-H, and summarizes relevant Aß immunotherapies. Through such knowledge, radiologists can optimally impact the management of patients receiving targeted AD therapies.

Comparing ARIA-E severity scales and effects of treatment management thresholds.

Introduction: Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities-edema (ARIA-E) is associated with anti-amyloid beta monoclonal antibody treatment. ARIA-E severity may be assessed using the Barkhof Grand Total Scale (BGTS) or the 3- or 5-point Severity Scales of ARIA-E (SSAE-3/SSAE-5). We assessed inter- and intra-reader correlations between SSAE-3/5 and BGTS. Methods: Magnetic resonance imaging scans were collected from 75 participants in the SCarlet RoAD and Marguerite RoAD studies. Three neuroradiologists reviewed scans at baseline and at follow-up. Concordance in dichotomized ARIA-E ratings was assessed for a range of BGTS thresholds. Results: SSAE-3/5 scores correlated with BGTS scores, with high inter-reader intraclass correlation coefficients across all scales. There was high agreement in dichotomized ratings for SSAE-3 > 1 versus BGTS > 3 for all readers (accuracy 0.85-0.93) and between pairs of readers. Discussion: SSAE-3/5 showed high degrees of correlation with BGTS, potentially allowing seamless transition from the BGTS to SSAE-3/5 for ARIA-E management.

Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities With Anti-amyloid Antibodies for the Treatment of Dementia Due to Alzheimer's Disease.

Second-generation anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies are emerging as a viable therapeutic option for individuals with prodromal and mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (AD). Passive immunotherapy with aducanumab (Aduhelm), lecanemab, donanemab, and gantenerumab all lower CNS amyloid (Aß) burden but come with a significant risk of amyloid-related imaging abnormality (ARIA)-the most common side effect of this class of drugs. While usually asymptomatic and detected only on brain MRI, ARIA may lead to new signs and symptoms including headache, worsening confusion, dizziness, visual disturbances, nausea, and seizures. In addition, one fatality related to ARIA-E (edema) with aducanumab and one fatality due to ARIA-H (hemorrhage) with donanemab are reported to date. ARIA-E may be associated with excessive neuroinflammation and saturation of perivascular clearance pathways, while ARIA-H may be related to vascular amyloid clearance with weakening and rupture of small blood vessels. The risk of ARIA-E is higher at treatment initiation, in ApoE4 carriers, with higher dosage, and with >4 of microhemorrhages on a baseline MRI. The risk of ARIA-H increases with age and cerebrovascular disease. Dose titration mitigates the risk of ARIA, and contraindications include individuals with >4 microhemorrhages and those prescribed anti-platelet or anti-coagulant drugs. A brain MRI is required before aducanumab is initiated, before each scheduled dose escalation, and with any new neurologic sign or symptom. Management of ARIA ranges from continued antibody treatment with monthly MRI monitoring for asymptomatic individuals to temporary or permanent suspension for symptomatic individuals or those with moderate to severe ARIA on MRI. Controlled studies regarding prevention and treatment of ARIA are lacking, but anecdotal evidence suggests that a pulse of intravenous corticosteroids may be of benefit, as well as a course of anticonvulsant for seizures.

Application of Meta-analysis to Evaluate Relationships Among ARIA-E Rate, Amyloid Reduction Rate, and Clinical Cognitive Response in Amyloid Therapeutic Clinical Trials for Early Alzheimer's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Removal of the extracellular Aß plaques in the brain is one of the mechanisms to treat Alzheimer's disease (AD). Separate clinical trials for several therapeutic compounds that target amyloid plaque reduction have shown noteworthy correlations among plaque removal, the Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities (ARIA) rate, and clinical efficacy of the treatment. The relationships among therapeutic dose levels, the rate of amyloid removal, and the clinical efficacy deserve further investigation across therapeutic agents, particularly for clinical trials to provide insights for strategies to develop amyloid therapies in Alzheimer's disease. METHODS: Published data summaries from clinical trials with amyloid therapies of aducanumab, donanemab, lecanemab, and gantenerumab are evaluated with meta-analyses. Linear mixed models for repeated measurements for visits and random study effects are applied to analyze amyloid centiloid value reduction from baseline and clinical cognition change from baseline for treatment groups according to doses and compounds for the clinical trials. Logistic regression analysis is applied to evaluate the relationship between the amyloid removal rate and the ARIA-Edema (ARIA-E) rate across different dose groups and clinical trials. RESULTS: The extent of amyloid removal varies among therapeutic agents and their dose levels. Across treatment groups and clinical trials, amyloid centiloid value reductions at Weeks 26 and 52 are strongly correlated with both ARIA-E rate over 78 weeks and the clinical efficacy response in the Clinical Dementia-Rating Scale Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) score change from baseline at Week 78; and the Spearman rank correlations for amyloid reduction at Week 52 are stronger as - 0.79 with the ARIA-E rate over 78 weeks and 0.73 with the Week 78 CDR-SB score change from baseline. CONCLUSION: Aß plaques removal in the brain due to amyloid therapy is strongly correlated with a better clinical response in patients with early Alzheimer's disease and a higher ARIA-E rate for the treatment groups and clinical trials in this meta-analysis. These relationships suggest that the balance between the clinical efficacy response and safety in ARIA-E rate is relevant for the choice of doses for amyloid therapies in confirmatory clinical trials.

Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities in an Aged Squirrel Monkey with Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy.

Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) in magnetic resonance imaging scans have emerged as indicators of potentially serious side effects in clinical trials of therapeutics for Alzheimer's disease. These anomalies include an edematous type (ARIA-E) that appears as hyperintense (bright) regions by T2-weighted MRI, and a type characterized by the deposition of hemosiderin (ARIA-H) that elicits a hypointense signal, especially in T2* susceptibility weighted images. ARIA in general has been linked to the presence of amyloid-ß (Aß)-type cerebral amyloid angiopathy, an accumulation of misfolded Aß protein in the vascular wall that impairs the integrity of brain blood vessels. However, the pathobiology of ARIA remains poorly understood, in part due to the absence of an animal model of the disorder that would enable a contemporaneous analysis of tissue integrity in the affected region. Here we describe both ARIA-E and ARIA-H in an aged squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus), a nonhuman primate model of naturally occurring cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Histopathologic examination of the anomalous region revealed reactive astrocytosis and microgliosis, infiltration of systemic inflammatory/immune cells, damage to axons and myelin, and hemosiderin deposition. The disruption of axons in particular suggests that ARIA-E could have functional consequences for affected regions. The squirrel monkey model can be useful for studying the pathogenesis and long-term effects of ARIA, and for testing the safety and efficacy of emerging therapies for Alzheimer's disease.

Bapineuzumab for mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease in two global, randomized, phase 3 trials.

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy (clinical and biomarker) and safety of intravenous bapineuzumab in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: Two of four phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 18-month trials were conducted globally: one in apolipoprotein E ε4 carriers and another in noncarriers. Patients received bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg (both trials) or 1.0 mg/kg (noncarrier trial) or placebo every 13 weeks. Coprimary endpoints were change from baseline to week 78 on the 11-item Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale and the Disability Assessment for Dementia. RESULTS: A total of 683 and 329 patients completed the current carrier and noncarrier trials, respectively, which were terminated prematurely owing to lack of efficacy in the two other phase 3 trials of bapineuzumab in AD. The current trials showed no significant difference between bapineuzumab and placebo for the coprimary endpoints and no effect of bapineuzumab on amyloid load or cerebrospinal fluid phosphorylated tau. (Both measures were stable over time in the placebo group.) Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities with edema or effusion were confirmed as the most notable adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: These phase 3 global trials confirmed lack of efficacy of bapineuzumab at tested doses on clinical endpoints in patients with mild to moderate AD. Some differences in the biomarker results were seen compared with the other phase 3 bapineuzumab trials. No unexpected adverse events were observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Noncarriers (3000) ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00667810 ; registered 24 Apr 2008. Carriers (3001) ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00676143 ; registered 2 May 2008.