Age Is Just a Number? The Impact of Age on Abdominoplasty Outcomes: A Single Surgeon Experience.

BACKGROUND: Abdominoplasty is among the most popular aesthetic procedures in plastic surgery worldwide. Common indications include prior massive weight loss, surgical or not, with remaining skin excess and post-pregnancy women looking to restore their youthful abdominal contour. Aging of the worldwide population results in a greater number of older patients interested in aesthetic procedures. Identifying the impact of age on abdominoplasty outcomes is crucial in ensuring the safety of care and determining sub-optimal patients that might not benefit from the procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of all abdominoplasty patients operated by the senior author were screened for appropriate patients. Patients were excluded from the study if the mandatory follow-up time was not met or in instances of incomplete medical records. Patients were further stratified into 5 age groups based on age and compared using pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative characteristics. Further regression analysis was performed to estimate the risk of complications for each individual age group, in an unadjusted and adjusted model. RESULTS: Six hundred and seventy-three patients were included in the study. Statistically significant differences were noted between the groups in respect smokers, prior bariatric surgery, and hypertension, diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia (p values <0.01). Seroma rates, were greatest in the oldest age group (P value = 0.039). Odds ratio of 3.3 was calculated for seroma development in patients aged greater than 60. In a multivariate analysis, the risk diminished and was found to be statistically insignificant. CONCLUSION: Abdominoplasty is a safe procedure in all age groups. Increased rates of specific complications must be assessed in relation to potential confounders that exist between different age groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Pregnancy After Panniculectomy Postbariatric Surgery: A Case Report.

Panniculectomy and abdominoplasty are two forms of abdominal body contouring commonly performed. There are literature reports of healthcare providers citing abdominoplasty as a contraindication to future pregnancy due to potential risks to the patient and fetus. Panniculectomy, outside of the reduced risks from the lack of rectus muscle plication, would have similar effects on the patient and fetus in future pregnancies. Yet, abdominal contouring surgery is being performed in women of childbearing age with increasing frequency, meriting further research to explore the true safety profile of pregnancy after body contouring surgeries. Here, we present a case report of a woman who underwent two full-term vaginal deliveries after undergoing a panniculectomy due to massive weight loss from prior gastric bypass. While she had high utilization of healthcare services throughout her pregnancies, she experienced no significant adverse pregnancy outcomes. Our report is consistent with current literature, suggesting that prior panniculectomy should not be a contraindication to pregnancy.

Abdominoplasty versus endoscopic approach to diastasis recti repair: A comparative study of outcomes.

Diastasis recti (DR) is characterized by the deviation of the abdominal rectus muscle due to widening of the linea alba and laxity of the abdominal wall musculature.1,2 This condition affects the quality of life, in terms of performance of activities of daily living and physical tasks.3-7 Several techniques have been described to correct DR.11 This prospective research aimed at comparing the traditional approaches vs endoscopic plication for DR repair in terms of safety, effectiveness and satisfaction of the patients based on patient-reported outcome measures via the BODY-Q abdomen scale. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective multicenter study in 2 departments of aesthetic and plastic surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, San Carlo of Nancy Hospital, Rome (group I) and Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Argentina group II). A total of 85 consecutive patients treated using abdominoplasty access (group I) and 85 consecutive patients treated using an endoscopic approach (group II) were enrolled in the study. The minimum follow-up was 12 months. Results: Descriptive statistics were used to report the counts and frequencies for categorical data. Continuous normally and non-normally distributed data were described as means with standard deviations and medians with interquartile ranges as appropriate. All analyses were performed using the STATA/IC 16.0 software. Conclusion: Our multicenter experience reveals that open and minimally invasive approaches are viable options. Identifying the optimal approach for DR repair should also rely on the patient's desired treatment outcome.

Aesthetic results in twin case undergoing transverse abdominoplasty versus Fleur-de-Lis abdominoplasty after massive weight loss.

This identical twin case demonstrates the aesthetic differences of two different body contouring procedures in alike patients. Body contouring improves physical, psychosocial, and sexual function therefore providing the best possible aesthetic outcome for massive weight loss patients is important. The Fleur-de-Lis pattern should be strongly considered when dealing with moderate to significant horizontal skin excess of the abdomen to obtain the best possible contouring and create an attractive female contour of hip and waist.

Retrograde Umbilical Hernia Repair During Abdominoplasty: A Safe and Simple Technique.

BACKGROUND: Abdominoplasties are a very common procedure that is geared toward improving the abdominal contour and restoring quality of life. Main candidates for surgery are postpartum patients and patients after massive weight lost results in excess skin. The high incidence of umbilical hernias in the general population raises the question of whether combining its repair with cosmetic abdominoplasties is a safe and effective procedure. PURPOSE: Determine the safety of the "retrograde umbilical hernia" (RUH) technique, which utilizes a pre-peritoneal approach to the hernia, during abdominoplasty procedure and expand the literature on hernia repair during aesthetic abdominal surgery. METHODS: This is the retrospective cohort study of all patients that underwent abdominoplasty by the senior author. Eligible patients were divided into 2 groups: where one group included all patients who underwent abdominoplasty with RUH repair, and the second group underwent sole abdominoplasty. Baseline variables, surgical notes, and post-operative outcomes were obtained from the patients' medical records and analyzed for the purpose of this study. RESULTS: In total, 744 patients underwent abdominoplasties during the course of our study, 112 of which underwent concomitant umbilical hernia repair using the retrograde technique. The RUH technique was not found to result in a higher rate of complications compared to a similar population of traditional abdominoplasties. CONCLUSIONS: The retrograde umbilical hernia repair is a safe and efficient technique that can be easily implemented during abdominoplasty procedures in a heterogeneous population of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The impact of simultaneous panniculectomy in ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Ventral hernia repair (VHR) is often performed in patients with obesity. While panniculectomy improves cosmetic outcomes, it may increase complications, particularly wound-related adverse events. Despite its widespread use, the impact of concurrent panniculectomy on postoperative complications in VHR remains unclear. This study aimed to assess whether concurrent panniculectomy increases postoperative complications in VHR. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases for studies published up to April 2024 comparing surgical outcomes in patients undergoing VHR with and without concurrent panniculectomy. We assessed recurrence, seroma, hematoma, surgical site infections (SSI), wound dehiscence, skin necrosis, chronic wound, length of stay (LOS), readmissions, duration of surgery, and deep venous thromboembolism (DVT). Risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled for dichotomous and continuous endpoints, respectively. We used RStudio for statistics and heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics. RESULTS: We screened 890 studies, fully reviewed 40, and included 11 observational studies and 2 randomized controlled trials, comprising 23,354 patients. Of these, 2,972 (13%) patients underwent VHR with concurrent panniculectomy (VHR-PAN). The mean age ranged from 37 to 59 years, and 73% of the sample were women. The mean BMI varied from 29 to 45 kg/m2, and 75% of the patients underwent mesh repair. The mean defect area ranged from 36 to 389 cm2. Most repairs were performed using mesh (75%) in an underlay position (68%) and 24% underwent component separation. VHR-PAN was associated with a decrease in recurrence rates (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.62 to 0.89; p < 0.001; I2 = 1%) with a follow-up ranging from 1 to 36 months. Furthermore, subgroup analysis of recurrence in studies with a mean follow-up of at least one year also showed a reduction in recurrence (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.88; p < 0.001; I2 = 12%), with a follow-up ranging from 12 to 36 months. Moreover, concurrent panniculectomy was associated with increased SSI (RR 1.31; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.51; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%), SSO (RR 1.49; 95% CI 1.26 to 1.77; p < 0.001; I2 = 11%), skin necrosis (RR 2.94; 95% CI 1.26 to 6.85; p = 0.012; I2 = 0%) and reoperation (RR 1.73; 95% CI 1.32 to 2.28; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%), and longer LOS (MD 0.90 day; 95%CI 0.40 to 1.40; p < 0.001; I2 = 56%). There was no significant difference in ocurrence of DVT, enterocutaneous fistula, hematoma, seroma, or wound dehiscence, neither on operative time or readmission rates. CONCLUSION: VHR-PAN is associated with lower recurrence rates. However, it increases the risk of wound morbidity and reoperation and prolongs hospital stay. Surgeons should carefully weigh the risks and benefits of performing VHR-PAN. STUDY REGISTRATION: A review protocol for this systematic review and meta-analysis was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42024542721).

Diastasis Recti with Concomitant Ventral Hernia Repair: An Initial Experience in the United Arab Emirates Population.

Introduction: Diastasis recti (DR) is characterized by an abnormal separation between the rectus abdominis muscles. Traditional repair includes only plication; however, complications may arise in the presence of concurrent ventral hernias (VH). This study aims to evaluate the safety and feasibility of diastasis repair in a United Arab Emirates (UAE) population. Methods and Procedures: This retrospective cohort study was conducted with IRB approval. All patients who underwent a DR repair (DRR) with concomitant ventral hernia repair between October 2022 and February 2024 were included. Results: A total of 20 patients were included in the study. The cohort was 80% female, with a mean overall age of 44.05 years. The mean body mass index was 27.4 kg/m2. All patients (100%) presented with DR associated with an abdominal wall defect; 17 patients (85%) with umbilical hernia, 2 patients (10%) with umbilical and incisional hernia, and 1 patient (5%) with umbilical with epigastric hernia. A total of 12 (60%) patients underwent laparoscopic DRR concomitant with VH repair, 5 (25%) patients underwent open DRR with VH repair and abdominoplasty, and 1 patient (5%) underwent DRR with VH repair and liposuction. All cases were successful without complications or conversions. Complications within 30 days included only seromas in 6 patients (30%), one requiring drainage. Conclusion: Our initial experience suggests that DR repair with concomitant VH repair and/or abdominoplasty is feasible and safe in the UAE population. Our experience demonstrated surgical outcomes compared to other regions in the world.

Drains in Abdominoplasties: The Less the Better?

BACKGROUND: Drains are traditionally inserted during surgery for reduction of fluid accumulation in the post-operative period. The appearance of drained fluids and their quantity can be early predictors of complications. Over the years, several studies have been conducted in attempt to determine the optimal number of drains that result in low rates of fluid accumulation with minimal impairment of quality of life. PURPOSE: Determine the optimal number of suction drains in abdominoplasty procedures. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study, analyzing all abdominoplasty patients operated by a single surgeon. Patients were stratified into 3 groups based on number of drains inserted at the end of the procedure. Rate of complications was compared between the groups and a multivariate logistic regression model was computed for the development of complications. RESULTS: Seven-hundred and forty three patients were included in the analysis of this study. No drains were inserted in 355 patients (45%), whereas a single drain was inserted in 153 (20.6%) 2 drains in 255 patients (34.4%). Patients for whom a single drain was inserted intra-operatively, experienced at a statistically significant lower rate, surgical site infections (OR = 0.235), hypertrophic scars (OR = 0.326), wound dehiscence (OR = 0.272), as compared to patients with no drains. On the contrary, insertion of single drain was associated with a statistically significant higher risk for development of seroma (OR = 6.276) and the need for revision surgery (OR = 2.452). CONCLUSION: Insertion of a single drain is associated with a lower risk of SSI and wound- dehiscence, but a greater risk for seroma development that requires surgical intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Effect of Compression Garments on Post-Abdominoplasty Outcomes: A systematic Review of the current Evidence.

Introduction: It is commonly believed that using abdominal binders or compression garments (CGs) after an abdominoplasty could encourage fluid to drain, which would prevent fluid from building up at the surgical site and reduce the risk of seroma and other similar problems. Objective: To evaluate the effect of the use of abdominal binders or CG on the post-operative outcomes following abdominoplasty. Design: Systematic review. Method: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to select relevant studies from 2004 to 2024. Data from the included studies were extracted to assess the quality and risk of bias using a modified Jadaad score. Main outcome: Post-operative seroma formation. Secondary outcome: Ventilatory function, intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), and subcutaneous edema were the outcomes of interest. Results: Only 5 trials totaling 130 patients were included in this review. Utilizing post-operative CG following abdominoplasty showed a non-significant tendency to decrease seroma development, ventilatory function, and subcutaneous edema. The limited evidence available also suggested that using post-operative CG increases IAP. Conclusion: Weak evidence supports the beneficial use of abdominal binders following abdominoplasty. Limitations: Low-quality scientific evidence available from the scant data and low caliber of the literature support the use of CG post-abdominoplasty. Therefore, unified outcome reporting and rigid randomized clinical trials are necessary to obtain valid data.

The Impact of Metabolic Syndrome on Postoperative Outcomes in Abdominal Body Contouring: A Propensity Score-Matched Nationwide Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) represents cardiometabolic dysregulation, defined by hypertension, obesity, diabetes, and dyslipidemia. There remains a significant gap in our understanding of whether MetS impacts outcomes of abdominal body contouring procedures. We aimed to assess the influence of MetS on postoperative outcomes of abdominal body contouring by concurrent abdominoplasty and panniculectomy. METHODS: The ACS-NSQIP database was utilized to identify patients who underwent concurrent abdominoplasty and panniculectomy procedures from 2012 to 2022. Through propensity score matching, distinct cohorts were established based on the presence of MetS, characterized by patients receiving medical interventions for diabetes mellitus and hypertension, with a body mass index exceeding 30 kg/m2. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to evaluate differences between groups. RESULTS: A total of 14,642 patients underwent abdominal body contouring from 2012 to 2022. Following propensity score matching, 730 patients were included in the analysis, with 365 in each group (MetS vs. non-MetS). Bivariate analysis revealed a longer hospital length of stay (2.3 vs. 1.6 days; p = 0.007) in the MetS cohort compared to the non-MetS cohort. Patients diagnosed with MetS had an average length of stay of 0.6 days longer than non-MetS patients (95% CI [0.17, 1.01]; p = 0.007). No noteworthy disparities were observed in the rates of 30-day wound complications, mild systemic, and severe systemic complications, and readmission rates between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that abdominal body contouring remains a secure option for patients with MetS. Nonetheless, the longer hospital length stays observed in patients with MetS may translate to increased overall costs to the healthcare system. Continued research is warranted to comprehensively assess the economic implications of MetS in the context of abdominal body contouring. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors  www.springer.com/00266 .

The use of Fibrin Sealants in Reducing Drain Output in Abdominoplasty: Is it Useful?

Background: Abdominoplasty is a common surgical procedure in which excess abdominal skin and fat are reduced to improve body contouring. Fibrin sealant has been proposed to reduce postsurgical bleeding and exudation. In this study, we evaluated whether there was a significant statistical difference in surgical output between the use of fibrin glue and its nonuse in abdominoplasty surgery, specifically in reducing bleeding and exudation. Material and methods: A retrospective chart review of 68 postbariatric abdominoplasty patients (58 females, 10 males) was performed. We divided the patients into Group A (30 cases, 44%), in which we used fibrin sealant, and Group B (38 cases, 56%), in which we did not use fibrin glue. We calculated the total amount of liquid in suction drainages until the day of their removal. Statistical analysis included the independent t-test with a significance level of 0.05. Results: The average drainage output in Group A was 620.0 ± 375.0 mL, whereas in Group B, it was 500.0 ± 290.0 mL. Results indicate an insignificant correlation between the use of fibrin glue and the amount of liquid in the surgical drains (t = 1.52, p = 0.13). The result is not significant at p <.05 according to the independent t-test. Conclusion: The use of fibrin sealant surely has a high value in all surgical branches to reduce postoperative complications, but in our study, we did not find any advantages in its use for reducing surgical drain output in abdominoplasty patients.

Experience in Post-Bariatric Abdominoplasty for Patients with Significant Weight Loss: A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Abdominoplasty is a critical aesthetic and functional procedure for individuals who have undergone massive weight loss. Numerous techniques have been proposed to optimize aesthetic results while minimizing complications. METHODS: This prospective study examined 500 patients who underwent abdominoplasty during body-contouring procedures between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2021 at a tertiary center. The Skin-Adipose Tissue-Muscle (SAM) protocol was employed to analyze the operative strategies and complication rates and compare them with the existing literature. Furthermore, patient satisfaction and aesthetic outcomes were measured one year post-operation using a comprehensive four-point questionnaire evaluated by the patients themselves and two independent surgeons. RESULTS: Participants had an average age of 34.8 years and a mean BMI of 31.1 kg/m2. The surgeries included 328 full abdominoplasties and 172 T-inverted abdominoplasties. Notable complications included wound infection (4%), wound dehiscence (8.6%), tissue necrosis (0.6%), seroma (8.4%), and hematoma (2.6%). A higher BMI was correlated with an increased risk of complications and lower patient satisfaction. Data analysis was performed using Stata version 18 software. CONCLUSIONS: The increasing prevalence of obesity highlights an urgent need for more bariatric surgeries and subsequent abdominoplasties to mitigate the effects of massive weight loss. A crucial link between elevated BMI and a heightened risk of postoperative complications, emphasizing the necessity for standardized surgical protocols tailored to individuals with higher BMI, was noted. Innovatively, future studies must further investigate the intricate dynamics between BMI and surgical risks. Exploring and establishing uniform, adaptive surgical guidelines promise to revolutionize patient care by significantly reducing complications and enhancing recovery and satisfaction following abdominoplasty.

Patient Weight and Chemoprophylaxis in Abdominoplasty: Does It Result in More Bleeding Events?

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery has gained popularity in recent decades as an effective treatment for obesity. Abdominoplasty is one of the most often performed aesthetic procedures all over the world. In post-bariatric patients undergoing abdominoplasty, the diameter size and number of the abdominal wall perforators increase proportionally with increased body weight. Postoperative complications that may occur are haematoma, and venous thromboembolism (VTE). In plastic surgery procedures VTE prophylaxis grades vary due to the lack of consensus and clear guidelines. The aim of this study was to explore the frequency of postoperative bleeding and VTE in patients undergoing abdominoplasty and to explore the risk factors associated with major bleeding. METHODS: A retrospective single-centre study of adult patients who were operated on by abdominoplasty between 2011 and 2020. Chemoprophylaxis including low molecular weight heparin (LMHW) was recommended when the operating time exceeded 2 h. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were included. There were no patients with VTE. Eight patients were re-operated for major haematoma. The weight loss (peak weight to weight before the abdominoplasty) was 14.4 kg larger in the re-operation group (p = 0.03). Eighty-eight percent in the re-operation group and 67% in the other group were treated with LMWH (p = 0.43). Multivariable logistic regression showed that with each decrease from the peak in BMI kg/m2 the risk of re-operation for major haematoma was increased by 22% (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Abdominoplasty in patients after massive weight loss has a higher risk of postoperative bleeding. Having a clear protocol for chemoprophylaxis should be considered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Could Abdominoplasty with Diastasis Recti Abdominis Correction Improve Stress Urinary Symptoms? A 1-Year Follow-up Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Diastasis recti abdominis (DRA) indicates an abnormal separation of the rectus abdominal muscles from the midline, resulting in abdominal bulging. Recent literature shows a correlation between DRA and back pain, stress urinary incontinence. Primary goal of this study is to check the correlation between DRA correction in abdominoplasty and improvement of urinary symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective study on patients with post-pregnancy rectus diastasis who underwent surgical correction of diastasis through conventional abdominoplasty. All patients were asked to complete the ICIQ-FLUTS questionnaire, which assesses urinary disorders, and the SF-36 questionnaire, aimed at quantifying health-related quality of life. The questionnaires were administered to patients the day before surgery and one year after surgery. RESULTS: The recruited patients (n = 51) were then stratified on the presence or absence of stress urinary incontinence. Of the 39 patients with preoperative incontinence, the average scores of the ICIQ-FLUTS were analyzed. In particular, for the questions relating to stress urinary incontinence a statistically significant difference was reported between the preoperative mean and the 1-year mean for all questions (p value<0.05). As regards quality of life, comparing the average scores of each question of SF-36 there is an improvement in the values of all the variables of the questionnaire. CONCLUSION: The strength of this study, which distinguishes it from other literature, is that the changes in abdominal pressure post-abdominoplasty which should lead to a worsening of stress incontinence, do not cause it. On the contrary, we have demonstrated the improvement of this symptom after conventional abdominoplasty surgery in most patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

[CONTACT BURNS WITH A HOT WATER BOTTLE FOLLOWING AN ABDOMINOPLASTY. CASE REPORTS AND LITERATURE REVIEW]. / BRÛLURES PAR CONTACT AVEC UNE BOUILLOTE DANS LES SUITES D'UNE ABDOMINOPLASTIE. CAS CLINIQUES ET REVUE DE LA LITTÉRATURE.

Loss of sensitivity in the operated area is common after some plastic surgery procedures and promotes accidental trauma on a daily basis. Several studies showed that a loss of sensitivity is constant after an abdominoplasty. We report here the cases of three 3rd degree burns by contact, at the subumbilical level, with a hot water bottle soon after an abdominoplasty, responsible for significant aesthetic sequelae.

Validation of the Manchester Cosmetic Clinician-Reported Outcomes Questionnaire (MCCRO-Q).

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) are collected pre- and post-operatively following cosmetic surgery. Clinicians assess their own outcomes following surgery, but without a validated clinician-reported outcome measure (CROM), there is no way to compare the clinical results among clinicians or compare these to PROM. Assessment of clinical outcomes is important to address the patients' expectations in the consenting process and to provide recommendations to patients preoperatively to improve post-operative appearance. To address the lack of validated CROM for cosmetic surgery, the Manchester Cosmetic Clinical Reported Outcome Questionnaire (MCCRO-Q) was developed. This study assessed the inter-rater reliability of assessors using the four-point scale pre- and post-operative MCCRO-Q questionnaires. Fifteen assessors reviewed photos from pre- and post-operative assessments in the UK between July 2016 and February 2020. Ninety-five patients were included in this validation study, with each patient assessed by a minimum of 3 assessors. MCCRO-Q showed consistency between reviewers, with all intra-class coefficient averages >0.5 for pre- and post-operative assessments. Moreover, 26% of preoperative assessments demonstrated perfect agreement, 56% had a maximum one-point difference and 18% had a two-point difference to the median score. Furthermore, 1% of postoperative assessments demonstrated perfect agreement, 36% had a one-point difference and 63% had a maximum point difference of 2 to the median score. The inter-rate agreement showed that MCCRO-Q is a reliable tool when used with 3 or more assessors to judge patient appearance clinically, preoperatively and post-operatively, concerning abdominoplasty.

Can AI Answer My Questions? Utilizing Artificial Intelligence in the Perioperative Assessment for Abdominoplasty Patients.

BACKGROUND: Abdominoplasty is a common operation, used for a range of cosmetic and functional issues, often in the context of divarication of recti, significant weight loss, and after pregnancy. Despite this, patient-surgeon communication gaps can hinder informed decision-making. The integration of large language models (LLMs) in healthcare offers potential for enhancing patient information. This study evaluated the feasibility of using LLMs for answering perioperative queries. METHODS: This study assessed the efficacy of four leading LLMs-OpenAI's ChatGPT-3.5, Anthropic's Claude, Google's Gemini, and Bing's CoPilot-using fifteen unique prompts. All outputs were evaluated using the Flesch-Kincaid, Flesch Reading Ease score, and Coleman-Liau index for readability assessment. The DISCERN score and a Likert scale were utilized to evaluate quality. Scores were assigned by two plastic surgical residents and then reviewed and discussed until a consensus was reached by five plastic surgeon specialists. RESULTS: ChatGPT-3.5 required the highest level for comprehension, followed by Gemini, Claude, then CoPilot. Claude provided the most appropriate and actionable advice. In terms of patient-friendliness, CoPilot outperformed the rest, enhancing engagement and information comprehensiveness. ChatGPT-3.5 and Gemini offered adequate, though unremarkable, advice, employing more professional language. CoPilot uniquely included visual aids and was the only model to use hyperlinks, although they were not very helpful and acceptable, and it faced limitations in responding to certain queries. CONCLUSION: ChatGPT-3.5, Gemini, Claude, and Bing's CoPilot showcased differences in readability and reliability. LLMs offer unique advantages for patient care but require careful selection. Future research should integrate LLM strengths and address weaknesses for optimal patient education. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Redefining Abdominal Contours: An Analysis of Medium Definition Liposuction Abdominoplasty.

INTRODUCTION: This study elucidates the application of Medium Definition Liposuction Abdominoplasty, a novel technique for achieving well-defined abdominal contours. The technique focuses on revealing the patient's inherent muscular volume and form by creating thinner flaps compared to traditional liposuction methodologies. METHODS: Objective evaluations of the abdominal wall's configuration were systematically executed both pre- and post-intervention for each participant. Digital image measurements facilitated by an image software constituted the basis for these assessments. The Body Fat Index was computed using precise measurements from seven distinct anatomical sites, with two measurements taken at each site and subsequently averaged. RESULTS: Over a span of 63 months, 300 patients underwent this combined procedure, resulting in discernible enhancements in the configuration of their abdominal walls in 97.6% of cases. However, complications such as partial diminution of tension in the muscular wall (2%), distal flap necrosis (0.6%), and minor muscular hernia (0.3%) were observed. CONCLUSION: The employment of combined muscle plication emerges as an efficacious methodology in meticulously rectifying alterations inherent within the muscular aponeurotic abdominal wall. This technique ensures the preservation of the original anatomical structure and functional dynamics, thereby circumventing the manifestation of local distortions that may arise from inadequate or excessive corrections. BULLET POINTS: The study introduces a novel technique, Medium Definition Liposuction Abdominoplasty, for achieving well-defined abdominal contours. This technique focuses on revealing the patient's inherent muscular volume and form by creating thinner flaps compared to traditional liposuction methodologies. Objective evaluations of the abdominal wall's configuration were systematically executed both pre- and post-intervention for each participant. The Body Fat Index was computed using precise measurements from seven distinct anatomical sites. Over a span of 63 months, 300 patients underwent this combined procedure, resulting in discernible enhancements in the configuration of their abdominal walls in 97.6% of cases. This technique ensures the preservation of the original anatomical structure and functional dynamics, thereby circumventing the manifestation of local distortions that may arise from inadequate or excessive corrections. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Navigating Aesthetic Pursuits: A Google Trends Insight into Cosmetic Tourism.

BACKGROUND: The popularity of cosmetic tourism may increase unnecessary risks for patients as postoperative care is variable. However, little is known about the current trends and public perception of this growing phenomenon. This study compares interest in cosmetic tourism in popular medical tourism destinations relative to the US. METHODS: Google Trends was queried from October 2017 to September 2023, examining trends over the full period and dissecting changes between 2017-2020 and 2020-2023. Search volume data were retrieved for the top international countries and the US for each of the top five cosmetic procedures, according to the ISAPS 2022 Global Survey. A p value < 0.05 was used for statistical significance. RESULTS: Searches for liposuction, blepharoplasty, breast augmentation, mastopexy, and abdominoplasty were compared between the US, Mexico, Turkey, Thailand, and Colombia. Google Trends data mirrored the prevalence of the two most common procedures, liposuction, and breast augmentation. Differences in interest regarding liposuction were greatest in Mexico, Thailand, and Turkey compared to the US (p < 0.05). Medical tourism for blepharoplasty had the highest search interest scores for Turkey and Thailand from 2017 to 2023 (p < 0.05). Significant differences were also consistent across all time intervals for breast augmentation, mastopexy, and abdominoplasty, with higher interest in Mexico and Turkey (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Google Trends analysis serves as an insightful tool for understanding cosmetic tourism. Changing trends bring the potential to assess worldwide versus country-specific procedure interest. These observed trends may foreshadow future international aesthetic procedure trends. NO LEVEL ASSIGNED: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Comparing the Outcomes of Scalpel and Diathermocoagulation Dissection in Abdominoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Abdominoplasty, an emerging surgical procedure worldwide, associated with complications, as seroma, infection, and hematoma. This systematic review and meta-analysis compare the outcomes of abdominoplasty procedures performed using a scalpel versus a diathermocoagulation device (diathermy monopolar electrocautery), aiming to find a safer approach with fewer complications. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search in November 2023 using PubMed, Ovid Medline, and Ovid Chocrane databases. The methodological index for nonrandomized studies and the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tools were used to assess risk of bias for observational studies and randomized controlled trials, respectively. The data were analyzed using RevMan software. RESULTS: Six articles (1135 patients) were included, 521 patients were operated using a scalpel and 614 using electrocautery. Our analysis suggests that both seroma and drain output were seen more among the electrocautery group, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.62 (95% CI [0.39, 0.97], p = 0.04) and - 103.63 (95% CI [- 205.67, - 1.59], p = 0.05), respectively. It is important to note the high heterogeneity seen among the studies discussing the total drain output. Additionally, we did not find any statistical significance between both techniques in terms of the rate of hematoma, wound infection, operation time, and hospital stay length. CONCLUSION: When comparing the use of scalpel and electrocautery dissection in abdominoplasty, higher rates of seroma and total drain output are significantly associated with electrocautery dissection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .