Invisibilização e preconceitos velados: barreiras para o acesso aos serviços de atenção básica pela população trans / Invisibilization and veiled prejudices: barriers to access to primary care services for the transgender population / Invisibilización y prejuicios velados: barreras para el acceso de la población trans a los servicios de atención primaria

Introdução: No processo de edificação da Política Nacional de Saúde Integral LGBT+, a Atenção Básica ganha importante destaque, pois deveria funcionar como o contato preferencial dos usuários transgênero (trans). Objetivo: Investigar quais as percepções dos profissionais da Atenção Básica quanto às situações de vulnerabilidade enfrentadas pelas pessoas trans, bem como pesquisar os impedimentos que eles consideram existir na busca dessa população por acesso a esses serviços. Métodos: Utilizou-se uma abordagem qualitativa por meio de entrevistas semiestruturadas com 38 profissionais de saúde atuantes das Estratégias Saúde da Família de dois municípios do interior do estado de São Paulo. O material obtido foi submetido à análise de conteúdo de Bardin. Resultados: Os resultados apontaram para o desconhecimento quanto aos reais empecilhos que dificultam o acesso e seguimento de pessoas trans nos serviços de saúde. Observou-se ainda a manutenção de preconceitos e ideias que reforçam estereótipos ligados ao tema e que se estendem ao exercício da profissão. Isso se relaciona diretamente com a falta da abordagem de assuntos relacionados à sexualidade humana na graduação desses profissionais, além da falta de atualização quanto ao tema, o que impacta a qualidade do serviço que é ofertado à população em estudo. Conclusões: As normativas e portarias já existentes precisam ser efetivamente postas em prática, fazendo-se imperativas a ampliação e difusão do conhecimento a respeito da temática trans no contexto dos serviços públicos de saúde, o que pode servir como base para subsidiar a formação dos profissionais que atuam nesse setor, bem como políticas públicas efetivas.

Introduction: In the process of creating the National LGBT+ Comprehensive Health Policy, primary care has important prominence as it must work as the preferential contact of transgender (trans) users. Objective: To investigate the perceptions of primary care professionals about the vulnerability situations faced by trans persons and also hindrances they consider existing in this population's search for access to these services. Methods: A qualitative approach was used through semi-structured interviews with 38 health care professionals working in the Family Health Strategy of two cities in the countryside of the state of São Paulo. The material obtained was submitted to analysis of Bardin content. Results: The results pointed to a lack of knowledge about real hindrances that obstruct the access to and follow-up by health services for trans persons. It was also observed the maintenance of prejudices and ideas that reinforce stereotypes connected to the matter and extend to the practice of professionals. It is directly related to the lack of approach of issues related to human sexuality in the education of those professionals, in addition to lack of update about it, which impacts the quality of service offered to the population under study. Conclusions: The standards and ordinances already existing need to be effectively practiced, being crucial the extension and spread of knowledge about trans matters in the context of public health services. It can be the basis for subsidizing the education of professionals who work in this field, as well as effective public policies.

Introducción: En el proceso de edificación de la Política Nacional de Salud Integral LGBT+, la Atención Básica tiene importante destaque, pues debería funcionar como contacto preferente de los usuarios transgénero (trans). Objetivo: Investigar las percepciones de los profesionales de Atención Básica sobre las situaciones de vulnerabilidad que enfrentan las personas trans, así como investigar los impedimentos que consideran que existe en la búsqueda de esta población por el acceso a estos servicios. Métodos: Se utilizó un abordaje cualitativo por medio de entrevistas semiestructuradas con 38 profesionales de salud actuantes de las Estrategias de Salud de la Familia de dos municipios del interior del estado de São Paulo. El material obtenido fue sometido a análisis de contenido de Bardin. Resultados: Los resultados apuntaron al desconocimiento sobre los reales obstáculos que dificultan el acceso de personas trans a los servicios, además del segmento de los cuidados en las unidades. Se observó además que se mantienen los prejuicios e ideas que refuerzan estereotipos vinculados al tema y que se extienden al ejercicio de la profesión. Esto se relaciona directamente a la falta da abordaje de asuntos relacionados a la sexualidad humana en la graduación de estos profesionales, además de la falta de actualización sobre el tema, lo que impacta en la calidad del servicio que se ofrece a la población en estudio. Conclusiones: Las normas y ordenanzas ya existentes deben ser efectivamente puestas en práctica, por lo que es imperativo ampliar y difundir el conocimiento sobre la temática trans en el contexto de los servicios públicos de salud, que pueda servir de base para apoyar la formación de profesionales que actúan en este sector, así como políticas públicas efectivas.

Extensively Antibiotic-Resistant Bacterial Infections in Trauma Cases Managed at the Médecins Sans Frontières Tertiary Orthopaedic Center in Mosul, Iraq: A Case Series.

The Médecins Sans Frontières Tertiary Orthopaedic Care center in Mosul, Iraq, provides reconstructive surgery, microbiological analysis, integrated infection prevention and control, and antibiotic stewardship services. Between May 2018 and February 2020, we recorded soft tissue and/or bone infections caused by gram-negative extensively drug-resistant (XDR) bacteria in 4.9% (13/266) of the admitted patients. The XDR bacteria identified among 12 patients in this case series were extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 5, 41.7%) with intermediate sensitivity or resistance to imipenem and/or meropenem, Acinetobacter spp (n = 3, 25.0%; 2 Acinetobacter baumannii strains) resistant to imipenem and/or meropenem, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 2, 16.7%) resistant to imipenem and meropenem, and extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Proteus mirabilis (n = 2, 16.7%) resistant to meropenem. Most XDR isolates were sensitive only to colistin or polymyxin B, neither of which is available in Iraq. Therefore, the only treatment option was multiple rounds of surgical debridement and wound care. The infection was deemed cured before discharge in 7 patients (58.3%). Meanwhile, 4 patients (33.3%) were discharged with unhealed wounds, and outpatient follow-up was planned. One patient died in the intensive care unit of a referral hospital after developing septicemia postsurgery. XDR bacteria pose substantial health risks in Iraq. Thus, improving antimicrobial stewardship and accessibility to essential antibiotics is critical to address this issue.

Veterinary and pet owner perspectives on addressing access to veterinary care and workforce challenges.

Objectives: (1) Assess and compare the perceptions of pet owners and veterinary professionals pertaining to the extent of veterinary workforce and access to care challenges in 2023 in Colorado, and (2) Assess what programs, policies, and resources veterinary professionals and pet owners believe would be most effective at addressing access to care and workforce challenges in Colorado. Sample: 736 veterinarians, veterinary technicians, or practice/owner manager ("veterinary professionals") in Colorado. A total of 1,209 pet owners (919 from an online survey and 290 from in-person surveying). Procedures: Distribution of an online anonymous survey to veterinary professionals in Colorado. Pet owners were surveyed both online and in-person at pet pantry or shelter events. Results: Veterinary professionals reported significant workforce challenges, including having to frequently divert clients, clients forced to decline medical care or having to euthanize their pets due to cost. Veterinary professionals were especially supportive of policy efforts to enhance recruitment and retention of technicians, including through mechanisms such as clarifying their scope of practice, loan repayment programs, and enhancing career pathways. Colorado pet owners' responses pertaining to the scope of access to care challenges were similar to prior national research. Pet owners reported particularly needing low-cost emergency clinics in their community as well as resources to reduce the cost of care. Pet owners were generally supportive of expanding veterinary care access through telemedicine; indicating they would feel comfortable seeing a veterinarian via telemedicine, even for the first time, and that expanded use of telemedicine would increase their ability to obtain care. Conclusions and clinical relevance: Colorado pet owners and veterinary professionals both identified numerous access to care challenges as well as indicated support for the development of several potential initiatives to address the problem. Low-cost clinics that provide sick and emergency care was the resource rated as being most helpful among pet owners. Further exploration of grants, voucher programs, expansion of telemedicine, increased utilization and title protection for CVTs, and the creation of the veterinary professional associate position are all initiatives that were noted to be worthy of further exploration.

Characteristics of foreign-born abortion patients in the United States, 2021-2022.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the characteristics of foreign-born abortion patients compared to those born in the Unites States (US) and to explore whether barriers for foreign-born patients varied by state Medicaid coverage of abortion care. STUDY DESIGN: We used data from the Guttmacher Institute's 2021-2022 Abortion Patient Survey, a national sample of patients obtaining clinic-based abortion care in the US. We compared sociodemographic characteristics of foreign- and US-born respondents, as well as barriers to care. Among foreign-born patients, we compared those in Medicaid coverage states vs. states that restrict Medicaid coverage. RESULTS: Some 12% of the 6,429 respondents were born outside the US. Compared to US-born patients, they were less likely to have Medicaid coverage and more likely to be Asian/Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander or Hispanic, to have no health insurance, and to have completed the survey in Spanish. In addition, foreign-born patients were more likely to report delays because they did not know where to get an abortion (18.3% vs. 12.6% for US-born). Compared to foreign-born patients living in Medicaid coverage states, those in non-Medicaid states reported multiple barriers, particularly related to cost: respondents in non-Medicaid states were 3 times as likely to pay out of pocket for abortion (75.8% vs. 27.4%) and 5 times more likely to rely on financial assistance (24.1% vs. 4.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Foreign-born abortion patients face knowledge and financial barriers to accessing abortion care compared to those who are US-born, and these financial burdens are amplified for those living in non-Medicaid coverage states. IMPLICATIONS: Abortion patients born outside the US may have overcome many obstacles to obtain care. Expanding state Medicaid coverage of abortion could reduce cost burdens for foreign-born populations.

Poverty and Its Impact on Surgical Care.

In this article, the authors explore the intricate relationship between poverty and surgical care, underscoring its multifaceted nature and its profound impact on access and outcomes. Poverty extends beyond financial constraints to encompass barriers related to healthcare infrastructure, geographic isolation, education, mental health, and social determinants of health, resulting in persistent disparities in access to high-quality surgical care, especially for those in persistently impoverished areas and access-sensitive surgical conditions. Additionally, the authors delve into the complex intersection of poverty, race, and ethnicity, emphasizing the heightened risks faced by minority patients in surgical care.

A narrative review on tip navigation and tip location of central venous access devices in the neonate: Intracavitary ECG or real time ultrasound?

The proper location of the tip of a central venous access device plays a crucial role in minimizing the risks potentially associated with its use. Recent guidelines strongly recommend preferring real-time, intra-procedural methods of tip location since they are more accurate, more reliable and more cost-effective than post-procedural methods. Intracavitary electrocardiography and real time ultrasound can both be applied in the neonatal setting, but they offer different advantages or disadvantages depending on the type of central venous access device. Reviewing the evidence currently available about the use of these two methods in neonates, in terms of applicability, feasibility and accuracy, it can be concluded that (a) real time ultrasound is the only acceptable methodology for tip navigation for any central venous access device in neonates, (b) intracavitary electrocardiography is the preferred method of tip location for central catheters inserted by ultrasound-guided cannulation of the internal jugular vein or the brachiocephalic vein, and (c) real time ultrasound is the preferred method of tip location for umbilical venous catheters, epicutaneo-cava catheters, and central catheters inserted by ultrasound-guided cannulation of the common femoral vein.

Focal alveolar hemorrhage following guide-wire progression into the pulmonary arterial circulation during fibrin sheath angioplasty and catheter exchange: Case report.

Central venous catheters are a frequently used vascular access for hemodialysis. Fibrin sheath formation is a common complication and is associated with catheter malfunction. Although fibrin sheath angioplasty with catheter exchange is a frequently employed procedure, it can be associated with mechanical complications. An important technical step in this procedure is progression of the guide-wire into the inferior vena cava. Focal alveolar hemorrhage is a very rare complication of this procedure. We report a case of a 70-year old patient on dual antiplatelet therapy who underwent fibrin sheath angioplasty with guide-wire catheter exchange and experienced focal alveolar hemorrhage presenting as hemoptysis and acute type 1 respiratory failure. Progression of the guide-wire into the pulmonary circulation and antithrombotic therapy played a significant role in the development of this complication. This report aims to call attention to a poorly described and potentially serious yet avoidable complication of fibrin sheath angioplasty with guide-wire catheter exchange.

Assessment of the deformation rate of venous diameter during internal jugular vein puncture using a newly developed thin-tip three-dimensional needle.

BACKGROUND: The internal jugular vein (IJV) is one of the most used sites for central venous access. Some authors revealed the association of a higher deformation rate of the IJV wall with posterior wall penetration, which may cause a hemorrhagic complication. A newly developed thin-tip needle (three-dimensional (3D) needle) reduced the deformation rate in an ex vivo study. Therefore, we conducted a clinical study to investigate its efficacy in reducing vessel deformity during IJV puncture. METHODS: This study retrospectively enrolled 80 adult patients who received central venous port (CVP) implantation via the IJV from April 1, 2022, to November 10, 2023, in our institution. Traditional needle-and-catheter was used for ultrasound (US)-guided IJV puncture (usual group) for the former 40 patients before July 18, 2023. Afterward, the 3D needle was used for the latter 40 patients (3D needle group). US images were stored and analyzed to calculate the deformation rate. RESULTS: The deformation rate was 58.6% (13.2-100) for the usual needle and 41.8% (10.6-100) for the 3D needle (p = 0.0034). Patients who required several punctures included 2 for the usual needle and 12 for the 3D needle, respectively (p = 0.0032). All patients and the usual needle group demonstrated a weak negative correlation between the deformation rate and pre-puncture vessel diameter (r = 0.24 and 0.41, respectively), with no correlation in the 3D needle group. CONCLUSION: The deformation rate of the IJV wall was smaller in the 3D needle group than in the usual needle group. The use of a 3D needle would be safer when puncturing the IJV.

Understanding the relationship between limited neighbourhood food access and health outcomes of children with obesity.

BACKGROUND: Childhood obesity is a growing worldwide epidemic that requires a biopsychosocial treatment approach to achieve a healthy lifestyle. This study on children in a weight management program examines the relationship between obesity, disease complications, and social determinants of health. We expect that children with higher degrees of obesity are more likely to live in areas lacking access to healthy food and have similar behavioural and socioeconomic characteristics. METHODS: Program participants were identified by neighbourhood food access status based on their home address. The prevalence of comorbidities in the participants was analyzed according to neighbourhood food accessibility. Multivariate regressions evaluated the association between participants' health outcomes and their sociodemographic and geographical characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 283 (98.3%) participants had a BMI ≥95th percentile for their age and sex and 68 (23.6%) lived in neighbourhoods with limited food access. Almost a third (Adj. R2 = 0.3302; p < 0.01) of the variability in study population's BMI was driven by sociodemographic factors, self-reported eating and physical activity behaviours, and had a positive relationship with access to healthy food. Nonetheless, HbA1c had a negative relationship with access to healthy food given the limited variation in the sample of participants with HbA1c levels indicating diabetes. CONCLUSION: Children living in neighbourhoods with limited food access had higher BMIs than other program participants. Thus, it is critical to identify children with limited neighbourhood food accessibility and promote societal and legislative change to improve access to healthy food.

Suture closure AFtEr large bore vein access (SAFE-VEIN): A randomized, prospective study of the efficacy and safety of venous closure device.

BACKGROUND: Perclose ProGlide (PPG) Suture-Mediated Closure System™ is safe and can reduce time to hemostasis following procedures requiring arterial access. AIMS: We aimed to compare PPG to figure of 8 suture in patients who underwent interventional catheter procedures requiring large bore venous access (LBVA) (≥13 French). METHODS: In this physician-initiated, randomized, single-center study [clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT04632641], single-stick venous access was obtained under ultrasound guidance. Eligible patients were randomized 1:1, and 100 subjects received allocated treatment to either PPG (n = 47) or figure of 8 suture (n = 53). No femoral arterial access was used in any patient. Primary outcomes were time to achieve hemostasis (TTH) and time to ambulation (TTA). Secondary outcomes were time to discharge (TTD) and vascular-related complications and mortality. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare TTH, TTA, and TTD. RESULTS: TTH (minutes) was significantly lower in PPG versus figure of 8 suture [median, (Q1, Q3)] [7 (2,10) vs. 11 (10,15) respectively, p < 0.001]. TTA (minutes) was significantly lower in PPG compared to figure of 8 suture [322 (246,452) vs. 403 (353, 633) respectively, p = 0.005]. TTD (minutes) was not significantly different between the PPG and figure of 8 suture arms [1257 (1081, 1544) vs. 1338 (1171,1435), p = 0.650]. There was no difference in minor bleeding or access site hematomas between both arms. No other vascular complications or mortality were reported. CONCLUSION: PPG use had lower TTH and TTA than figure of 8 suture in a population of patients receiving LBVA procedures. This may encourage same-day discharge in these patients.

The Genetic Diagnostics of Hemochromatosis: Disparities in Low- Versus High-Income Countries.

This study provides a comprehensive overview of hereditary hemochromatosis (HH), a genetic condition characterized by iron overload due to excessive iron absorption. It elucidates diverse inheritance patterns and clinical manifestations by exploring mutations in critical genes such as HFE (hemochromatosis), HJV (hemojuvelin), HAMP (hepcidin antimicrobial peptide), TfR2 (transferrin receptor 2), and FP (ferroportin). The significance of early screening, diagnosis, and personalized management strategies based on genetic classification is emphasized, particularly in terms of high-income vs. low-income countries. Addressing challenges in diagnosis, genetic testing accessibility, and healthcare disparities, the study highlights the importance of early detection, cost-effective screening strategies, and enhancing healthcare outcomes globally. Advanced genetic testing in high-income countries facilitates early diagnosis and management, reducing complications such as liver disease and cardiomyopathy. In contrast, low-income populations face several barriers, including limited access to genetic testing, high costs, and inadequate healthcare infrastructure. Cost-effective serum ferritin (SF) and transferrin saturation (TS) tests and emerging point-of-care (POC) tests offer affordable diagnostic options for low-resource settings. Additionally, the ongoing development of hepcidin measurement methods holds promise for enhancing diagnostic capabilities. Implementing these strategies can aid healthcare providers in improving global HH management and reducing the burden of iron overload complications. Furthermore, the study underscores the need for public health initiatives to raise awareness about HH, promote routine screenings, and advocate for equitable healthcare policies. Collaborative efforts between governments, healthcare organizations, and research institutions are crucial in addressing the global burden of HH. By fostering international cooperation and resource-sharing, it is possible to bridge the gap between high-income and low-income countries, ensuring all individuals have access to the necessary diagnostic and treatment options. This holistic approach can ultimately lead to better health outcomes and improved quality of life for individuals affected by HH worldwide. This comprehensive examination of HH not only illuminates the genetic and clinical aspects of the condition but also provides a roadmap for addressing the multifaceted challenges associated with its diagnosis and management.

Accommodating persons with communication disabilities in court: Perspectives of law students.

Background: Individuals with communication disabilities encounter obstacles in attaining equal access to justice compared to others. Despite experiencing widespread violence and abuse, they come across as challenges in seeking remedies through the legal system. One barrier is the lack of awareness among legal practitioners regarding suitable accommodations that would facilitate effective participation in court for individuals with communication disabilities. Objectives: This study explores the awareness of final-year law students concerning court accommodations available for individuals with communication disabilities, allowing them to testify in a South African court. The findings can serve as inspiration for expanding the current curriculum for law students. Method: This qualitative study used a modified six-step nominal group technique whereby participants (six law students identified through snowball sampling) generated, discussed and reached a consensus on accommodations needed by individuals with communication disabilities, enabling them to provide testimony in court. Data were analysed using thematic analysis principles. Results: The study found that although participants had not received any instruction on disability rights, access to justice or court accommodations during their legal training at the undergraduate level, they were able to perceive and learn about four main types of court accommodations for persons with communication disabilities to enable their testimony. Conclusion: Final-year law students are aware of court accommodations despite not having received formal instruction in disability law. Contribution: The inclusion of disability rights and court accommodations is recommended at the undergraduate level to ensure that when in practice, lawyers have knowledge on ensuring access to justice for persons with communication disabilities.

Innovative outpatient treatment for veterans and service members and their family members.

In 2009, Massachusetts General Hospital and the Red Sox Foundation launched Home Base, a nonprofit dedicated to providing care to veterans, service members, and their loved ones who struggle with the invisible wounds of war free of charge. Significant needs exist for mental health services in each of these populations, and a need for innovative approaches to address shortcomings in existing treatment models. Three inventive components of our programming are highlighted herein: a Veteran Outreach Team, which helps to engage patients in care, programming, and services specifically for family members, and an intensive outpatient substance use treatment program. More than 4,000 patients, 3,031 veterans and service members, and 1,025 family members have engaged in treatment at Home Base. Patients were asked to complete post-treatment self-measures, including a satisfaction questionnaire via an electronic data collection system. The vast majority of individuals who engaged in our treatment model were satisfied with the care they received (>92%) and would refer their peers to the Home Base program (>75%). Data from 78 individuals who completed the dual diagnosis services demonstrated large effect sizes in reductions in alcohol use and comorbid mental health symptoms. These data suggest that novel components to the standard outpatient mental health model might provide substantive benefits for the patients served. While internal data is prone to a lack of generalizability, these additional offerings help ameliorate patients' expressed shortcomings with existing models; present literature that describes the benefits that these additions provide is also reviewed. The lessons learned and limitations are discussed.

Comparing Federal Communications Commission and Microsoft Estimates of Broadband Access for Mental Health Video Telemedicine Among Veterans: Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of telemedicine in health care. However, video telemedicine requires adequate broadband internet speeds. As video-based telemedicine grows, variations in broadband access must be accurately measured and characterized. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Microsoft US broadband use data sources to measure county-level broadband access among veterans receiving mental health care from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). METHODS: Retrospective observational cohort study using administrative data to identify mental health visits from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020, among 1161 VHA mental health clinics. The exposure is county-level broadband percentages calculated as the percentage of the county population with access to adequate broadband speeds (ie, download >25 megabits per second) as measured by the FCC and Microsoft. All veterans receiving VHA mental health services during the study period were included and categorized based on their use of video mental health visits. Broadband access was compared between and within data sources, stratified by video versus no video telemedicine use. RESULTS: Over the 2-year study period, 1,474,024 veterans with VHA mental health visits were identified. Average broadband percentages varied by source (FCC mean 91.3%, SD 12.5% vs Microsoft mean 48.2%, SD 18.1%; P<.001). Within each data source, broadband percentages generally increased from 2019 to 2020. Adjusted regression analyses estimated the change after pandemic onset versus before the pandemic in quarterly county-based mental health visit counts at prespecified broadband percentages. Using FCC model estimates, given all other covariates are constant and assuming an FCC percentage set at 70%, the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of county-level quarterly mental video visits during the COVID-19 pandemic was 6.81 times (95% CI 6.49-7.13) the rate before the pandemic. In comparison, the model using Microsoft data exhibited a stronger association (IRR 7.28; 95% CI 6.78-7.81). This relationship held across all broadband access levels assessed. CONCLUSIONS: This study found FCC broadband data estimated higher and less variable county-level broadband percentages compared to those estimated using Microsoft data. Regardless of the data source, veterans without mental health video visits lived in counties with lower broadband access, highlighting the need for accurate broadband speeds to prioritize infrastructure and intervention development based on the greatest community-level impacts. Future work should link broadband access to differences in clinical outcomes.

Understanding structural inequities in Covid-19 vaccine access and uptake among disability, transgender and gender-diverse communities in India.

INTRODUCTION: Undervaccination and vaccination-related anxieties among marginalised communities like the transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) and disability communities are underexplored in the Indian context. Our study seeks to understand the role of structural and historical inequities in shaping COVID-19 vaccine access for the two communities in India. METHODS: Using a participatory qualitative research approach, TGD and disabled individuals were involved in and consulted throughout the research process. We interviewed 45 individuals for our study, hailing from the two communities and other key stakeholders and health system representatives involved in vaccination roll-out in India. We conducted an inductive thematic analysis guided by the socio-ecological model and intersectionality approach. RESULTS: Despite intent to get vaccinated among most participants, several structural barriers shaped COVID-19 vaccine access for people from the TGD and disability community. This included information and communication gaps with respect to the specific health needs of the two communities, barriers related to vaccine registration, data collection, transport, infrastructure and actual or anticipated mistreatment at vaccine centres. Each emergent structural gap in vaccination had parallels in past health systems experiences, pointing to the longstanding and pervasive inequities within health and allied systems which impact how communities perceive and respond to new health system interventions. CONCLUSION: This study uncovers the structural inequities within health systems that have permeated the planning, design and outreach of COVID-19 vaccination programs in India. Moving beyond notions of vaccine hesitancy among the TGD and disability community, we underscore the importance of socio-historical contexts of marginalisation and advocate for systems to recognise these contexts and respond equitably to the vaccination and health needs of the two communities. While some challenges among the two communities were distinct, the study explores how a shared experience of exclusion from public systems can provide avenues for cross-movement advocacy and solidarity, and help inform health system reforms.

Advancing minimally invasive hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: barriers to adoption and equitable access.

BACKGROUND: Despite a growing body of literature supporting the safety of robotic hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) procedures, the adoption of minimally invasive techniques in HPB surgery has been slow compared to other specialties. We aimed to identify barriers to implementing robotic assisted surgery (RAS) in HPB and present a framework that highlights opportunities to improve adoption. METHODS: A modified nominal group technique guided by a 13-question framework was utilized. The meeting session was guided by senior authors, and field notes were also collected. Results were reviewed and free text responses were analyzed for major themes. A follow-up priority setting survey was distributed to all participants based on meeting results. RESULTS: Twenty three surgeons with varying robotic HPB experience from different practice settings participated in the discussion. The majority of surgeons identified operating room efficiency, having a dedicated operating room team, and the overall hospital culture and openness to innovation as important facilitators of implementing a RAS program. In contrast, cost, capacity building, disparities/risk of regionalization, lack of evidence, and time/effort were identified as the most significant barriers. When asked to prioritize the most important issues to be addressed, participants noted access and availability of the robot as the most important issue, followed by institutional support, cost, quality of supporting evidence, and need for robotic training. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports surgeons' perceptions of major barriers to equitable access and increased implementation of robotic HPB surgery. To overcome such barriers, defining key resources, adopting innovative solutions, and developing better methods of collecting long term data should be the top priorities.

Pandemic Times and Health Care Exclusion: Attitudes Toward Health Care Exclusion of Undocumented Immigrants.

CONTEXT: Most of the 11 million undocumented immigrants living in the United States are excluded from government healthcare programs. Yet, healthcare inequities pose significant dangers to all members of society during a pandemic. This project explores to what extent undocumented immigrants, in the context of a pandemic, can be seen as deserving of access to government healthcare programs. METHODS: The first survey experiment explores whether work ethic can affect perceptions of undocumented immigrants as deserving of government healthcare programs. The second survey experiment tests to what extent appeals to fairness and self-interest, during a pandemic, shape healthcare deservingness attitudes. FINDINGS: The results show that respondents view undocumented immigrants as less deserving of healthcare than citizens, even when undocumented immigrants have a solid work history. The second survey experiment, however, shows that appeals to fairness and self-interest trigger substantial increases in support for undocumented immigrants, both among Republicans and Democrats. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that while undocumented immigrants are seen as less deserving of access, appeals to fairness and self-interest can trigger increased support.

Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage and 30-Day Outcomes for Common Cardiovascular Conditions.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the relationship between neighborhood environment and cardiovascular outcomes is important to achieve health equity and implement effective quality strategies. We conducted a population-based cohort study to determine the association of neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation and 30-day mortality and readmission rate for patients admitted with common cardiovascular conditions. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined claims data from fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years between 2017 and 2019 admitted for heart failure, valvular heart disease, ischemic heart disease, or cardiac arrhythmias. The primary exposure was the Area Deprivation Index; outcomes were 30-day all-cause death and unplanned readmission. More than 2 million admissions were included. After sequential adjustment for patient characteristics (demographics, dual eligibility, comorbidities), area health care resources (primary care clinicians, specialists, and hospital beds per capita), and admitting hospital characteristics (ownership, size, teaching status), there was a dose-dependent association between neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation and 30-day mortality rate for all conditions. In the fully adjusted model for death, estimated effect sizes of residence in the most disadvantaged versus least disadvantaged neighborhoods ranged from adjusted odds ratio 1.29 (95% CI, 1.22-1.36) for the heart failure group to adjusted odds ratio 1.63 (95% CI, 1.36-1.95) for the valvular heart disease group. Neighborhood deprivation was associated with increased adjusted 30-day readmission rates, with estimated effect sizes from adjusted odds ratio 1.09 (95% CI, 1.05-1.14) for heart failure to adjusted odds ratio 1.19 (95% CI, 1.13-1.26) for arrhythmia. CONCLUSIONS: Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with 30-day mortality rate and readmission for patients admitted with common cardiovascular conditions independent of individual demographics, socioeconomic status, medical risk, care access, or admitting hospital characteristics.

Exploring the experiences and preferences of South Asian patients' of primary care in England since COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: Remote (digital and/or telephone) access and consultation models are being driven by national policy with the goal being that the National Health Service operate on a remote-first (digital-first) basis by 2029. Previous research has suggested that remote methods of access to care and consulting may act to widen health inequalities for certain patients and/or groups such as those from ethnic minorities. South Asian (SA) patients comprise the largest ethnic minority group in England. Understanding the experiences and needs of this group is critical to ensuring that general practice can deliver equitable, quality health care. METHODS: Qualitative study. 37 participants (from Indian, Pakistani and/or Bangladeshi background) were recruited to take part in either in-person preferred language focus groups or remote semistructured interviews in the English language. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify themes in the qualitative data. FINDINGS: Three major interlinked themes were identified: (1) reduced access, (2) reduced patient choice and (3) quality and safety concerns. The findings highlight access issues split by (i) general issues with appointment access via any remote means and (ii) specific issues related to language barriers creating additional barriers to access and care. Some patients valued the convenience of remote access but also raised concerns regarding appointment availability and reduced patient choice. Face-to-face consultations were preferable but less available. The findings underscore how participants perceived remote care to be of lesser quality and less safe. Concerns were greatest for those with limited English proficiency (LEP), with the removal of non-verbal aspects of communication and 'hands-on' care leading to perceptions of reduced psycho-social safety. CONCLUSION: SA patients' experiences of remote-led primary care access and care delivery were negative with only a minority viewing it positively and for certain limited scenarios. Face-to-face models of care remain the preferred mode of consultation, particularly for those with LEP. Hybrid models of access offer patients the greatest choice, and are likely to meet the varying needs of the South-Asian patient population going forwards. The remote first approach to primary care may be achievable as a service ideal, but its limitations need to be recognised and accounted for to ensure that primary care can be an equitable service, both now and in the future. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Members of the public were involved in all phases of research in the study. This included co-working in partnership throughout the study including, reviewing patient-facing documents, recruiting participants, data facilitation, translation work, interpretation of the data and co-authors on this manuscript. The key to the success of our study was collaborative teamwork, which involved experienced members of the public with SA cultural knowledge working together with and integral to the research team for all components.

Mind the GAHP: A novel protocol for improved vascular access in the hypotensive patient.

Background: Obtaining intravenous access in hypotensive patients is challenging and may critically delay resuscitation. The Graduated Vascular Access for Hypotensive Patient (GAHP) protocol leverages intraosseous fluid boluses to specifically dilate proximal veins. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of GAHP in maximizing venous targets through early distal intraosseous access and a small fluid bolus. Methods: This was a prospective randomized cadaveric pilot study to evaluate extremity venous engorgement during intraosseous infusion. Cadavers (n = 23) had an intraosseous needle inserted into four sites: distal radius, proximal humerus, distal femur, and distal tibia. Intraosseous saline was rapidly infused, venous optimization was measured using real-time ultrasound. Primary outcome was maximum vessel circumference increase with intraosseous infusion. Secondary outcomes were: time to maximum circumference, and infusion volume required. Statistical analyses included Levene's test for equality of variances, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and generalized estimating equation. Results: There was a significant mean increase of 1.03 cm (95% CI 0.86, 1.20), representing a difference of 102%. We found no significant difference in time to optimize vessel circumference across sites, but volume required significantly differed. Conclusion: GAHP quickly and effectively increased the circumference of anatomically adjacent veins. Anatomical sites did not differ on time to reach maximum enlargement of vessels following intraosseous infusion but did differ in terms of volume required to maximize vessel circumference. Further research is needed using live, hypotensive patients.