Case report: A case of severe capecitabine toxicity due to confirmed in trans compound heterozygosity of a common and rare DPYD variant.

Variations in the activity of the enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) are associated with toxicity to fluoropyrimidine-containing chemotherapy. Testing of DPD deficiency either by targeted genotyping of the corresponding DPYD gene or by quantification of plasma concentration of uracil and dihydrouracil (phenotyping approach) are the two main methods capable of predicting reduced enzymatic activity in order to reduce adverse reactions after fluoropyrimidine treatment. In this paper, we describe a patient with locally advanced colon carcinoma with severe toxicity following capecitabine therapy. Whereas targeted genotyping for the 4 most common DPYD variants analysis revealed heterozygous presence of the c.2846A>T variant, which is a relatively common variant associated with a partial deficiency, additional phenotyping was compatible with a complete DPD deficiency. Subsequent sequencing of the whole DPYD gene revealed the additional presence of the rare c.2872A>G variant, which is associated with a total loss of DPD activity. A clinical case of in trans compound heterozygosity of a common and a rare DPYD variant (c.2846A>T and c.2872A>G) has, to the best of our knowledge, not been previously described. Our case report shows the importance of performing either preemptive phenotyping or preemptive complete genetic analysis of the DPYD gene for patients planned for systemic fluoropyrimidines to identify rare and low frequency variants responsible for potentially life-threatening toxic reactions.

Prognostic Nutritional Index is Related to All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Stage IV Colorectal Cancer Treated With Capecitabine: Single-Center 24-Month Observational Study in Vietnam.

AIM: To determine the mortality rate and the predictive value of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) for all-cause mortality during the 24 months in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer treated with capecitabine. METHODS: We conducted a study on 87 stage IV colorectal cancer patients treated with capecitabine. Before the day of treatment, all patients were measured CEA and CRP-hs levels and calculated neutrophil/lympho ratio (NLR) and PNI. Patients were monitored and collected drug side effects and mortality for 24 months. RESULTS: The mortality rate of study subjects was 60.9%. CRP-hs, NLR, and PNI were independent factors associated with 24-month mortality in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer (p < 0.05 to p < 0.01). At a cut-off value of 38.51, PNI was a predictor for mortality, with the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88 and p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: PNI was a good predictor of all-cause mortality in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer treated with capecitabine for 24 months.

A sustainable RP-HPLC method for concurrent estimation of capecitabine and celecoxib in liposomal formulation: Greenness and whiteness appraisal.

Liposomes have been reported for combination therapy due to their ability to carry both hydrophilic and lipophilic drugs together. The current investigation aims to develop a novel, eco-friendly, and sustainable reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) method for the simultaneous quantification of capecitabine and celecoxib co-encapsulated in liposomes. The method reported herein uses a C18 column (4.6 × 250 mm2, 5 µm) and a mobile phase consisting of water, and acetonitrile/methanol in a ratio of 60:40, containing 0.1% formic acid in both the phases. The flow rate is maintained at 1 mL/min, with an injection volume of 10 µL in the gradient mode. Detection is set at λmax = 240 nm for capecitabine and 252 nm for celecoxib. The developed liposomes are mono-disperse with a surface potential of -6.93 mV. The average size of the liposomes is 142 nm. The percentage entrapment efficiency for capecitabine is 52.39 ± 0.94%, and for celecoxib, it is 77.13 ± 0.74%. The Analytical Greenness Metric of 0.61 and Analytical Eco-Scale Score of 75 signify the greenness of the developed method. Also, the Red-Green-Blue model shows excellent whiteness, with a score of 83.2. Thus, the developed method offers a reliable, accurate, precise, buffer-free, and environment-friendly RP-HPLC approach for the simultaneous analysis of capecitabine and celecoxib co-encapsulated in liposomes.

Neoadjuvant Capecitabine in Operable HPV-Negative Head and Neck Cancer: Fortuitous Findings in a Resource Constrained Setting.

OBJECTIVE: Limited progress has occurred in treating operable human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Accessing timely care remains challenging in public health care systems, potentially resulting in disease progression before treatment initiation. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort of patients receiving neoadjuvant capecitabine (NC) was compared to stage-matched patients undergoing standard of care (SC). SETTING: This study was performed at 2 academic centers in Montreal, Canada. METHODS: To ascertain the effect of 2 cycles of NC in operable HPV-negative HNSCC patients on clinical-to-pathologic stage migration. Comparison to an SC group was performed to site and TNM stage matched patients. Pathologic treatment response was measured using the modified Ryan score. RESULTS: We compared 16 NC patients (11 oral cavity, 3 skin, 2 larynx) with 32 SC patients. Ten NC patients exhibited a pathologic response (1 complete, 3 major, 6 minor). Clinical-to-pathologic stage migration differed significantly between NC and SC groups: downstage (6 vs 1), upstage (3 vs 14), no change (7 vs 17, P = .0047). There was no severe treatment toxicity related to capecitabine. All patients in the NC group underwent surgery. CONCLUSION: NC followed by surgery demonstrates measurable pathologic response in HPV-negative HNSCC, suggesting potential utility in resource-limited health care settings.

Management of severe capecitabine-induced corneal toxicity.

Purpose: To describe the clinical presentation and management of severe capecitabine-induced corneal toxicity. Observations: A 71-year-old woman presented with severe bilateral vision loss. Four months earlier, capecitabine was initiated for a metastatic invasive ductal carcinoma. Biomicroscopy revealed bilateral whorl-like corneal epitheliopathy accompanied by metaplasia, keratinization and subepithelial fibrosis. After consulting the treating oncologist, capecitabine treatment was discontinued. Initially, a non-surgical approach was adopted and intensive topical dexamethasone treatment was applied. Despite capecitabine discontinuation and topical steroid treatment, visual acuity progressively declined. Bilateral corneal scraping and bandage contact lens fitting was performed. This resulted in significant improvement of visual acuity, corneal surface regularity and quality of life. Conclusion and importance: We report the first case of severe visual impairment due to capecitabine-induced corneal toxicity. Early corneal scraping, especially when confronted with profound vision loss, may yield better outcomes compared to relying on spontaneous recovery after capecitabine discontinuation. Patients experiencing ocular discomfort and vision loss, while receiving capecitabine therapy, should be referred for semi-urgent ophthalmological examination.

A Phase I Trial of Alpelisib Combined With Capecitabine in Patients With HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Alpelisib is an oral α-specific class I PI3K inhibitor approved in combination with fulvestrant for the treatment of PIK3CA-mutated hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer. The tolerability of this drug with the oral chemotherapy capecitabine is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase I trial evaluated the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of alpelisib (250 mg or 300 mg daily for 3-weeks) with capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 twice daily for 2-weeks followed by a 1-week rest period) in patients with metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer, regardless of PIK3CA mutation status. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were treated with alpelisib-capecitabine. Half of the patients had HR+ breast cancer, and 16 had prior systemic therapy for metastatic disease. The MTD of alpelisib was 250 mg daily in combination with capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily. DLTs included hyperglycemia, QTc prolongation, fatigue, and chest pain. The most common grade 3 adverse event (AE) was hyperglycemia (28%). No grade 4 AEs were observed. Three patients discontinued therapy due to an AE. One-third of patients required dose reduction of both alpelisib and capecitabine. Four patients experienced a partial response and 8 patients experienced stable disease. The median progression-free survival was 9.7 months (95% CI 2.8-13.5 months) and median overall survival was 18.2 months (95% CI 7.2-35.2 months). Twelve patients had PIK3CA mutation testing completed, of these 2 had known or likely deleterious PIK3CA mutation. CONCLUSION: This study provides safety data for an oral combination therapy of alpelisib-capecitabine and defines tolerable doses for further study.

Chemotherapy increases CDA expression and sensitizes malignant pleural mesothelioma cells to capecitabine treatment.

The combination of cisplatin and pemetrexed remains the gold standard chemotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), although resistance and poor response pose a significant challenge. Cytidine deaminase (CDA) is a key enzyme in the nucleotide salvage pathway and is involved in the adaptive stress response to chemotherapy. The cytidine analog capecitabine and its metabolite 5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine (5'-DFCR) are converted via CDA to 5-fluorouracil, which affects DNA and RNA metabolism. This study investigated a schedule-dependent treatment strategy, proposing that initial chemotherapy induces CDA expression, sensitizing cells to subsequent capecitabine treatment. Basal CDA protein expression was low in different mesothelioma cell lines but increased in the corresponding xenografts. Standard chemotherapy increased CDA protein levels in MPM cells in vitro and in vivo in a schedule-dependent manner. This was associated with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and with HIF-1alpha expression at the transcriptional level. In addition, pretreatment with cisplatin and pemetrexed in combination sensitized MPM xenografts to capecitabine. Analysis of a tissue microarray (TMA) consisting of samples from 98 human MPM patients revealed that most human MPM samples had negative CDA expression. While survival curves based on CDA expression in matched samples clearly separated, significance was not reached due to the limited sample size. In non-matched samples, CDA expression before but not after neoadjuvant therapy was significantly associated with worse overall survival. In conclusion, chemotherapy increases CDA expression in xenografts, which is consistent with our in vitro results in MPM and lung cancer. A subset of matched patient samples showed increased CDA expression after therapy, suggesting that a schedule-dependent treatment strategy based on chemotherapy and capecitabine may benefit a selected MPM patient population.

Nab-paclitaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancers: An open-label, non-randomized, phase II clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors with high malignancy, poor prognosis, and limited treatment options. AIM: To explore the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for advanced and metastatic BTCs. METHODS: This open-label, non-randomized, double-center, phase II clinical trial recruited systemic therapy-naive patients with unresectable or metastatic BTCs between April 2019 and June 2022 at Beijing Cancer Hospital and the First Hospital of China Medical University. Eligible patients were administered nab-paclitaxel (150 mg/m2, day 1) and capecitabine (2000 mg/m2, twice daily, days 1-7) in 14-day cycles until experiencing intolerable toxicity or disease progression. The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary outcomes included the disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients successfully completed the trial, with a median age of 64.00 years (interquartile range, 35.00-76.00), and 26 (59.09%) were females. Tumor response assessment was impeded for one patient due to premature demise from tumor hemorrhage. Among the remaining 43 patients undergoing at least one imaging assessment, the ORR was 23.26% [95% confidence interval (CI): 11.80%-38.60%], and the DCR was 69.77% (95%CI: 53.90%-82.80%). The median OS was 14.1 months (95%CI: 8.3-19.9), and the median PFS was 4.4 months (95%CI: 2.5-6.3). A total of 41 patients (93.18%) experienced at least one adverse event (AE), with 10 patients (22.73%) encountering grade ≥ 3 AEs, and the most frequent AEs of any grade were alopecia (79.50%), leukopenia (54.55%), neutropenia (52.27%), and liver dysfunction (40.91%), and no treatment-related deaths were documented. CONCLUSION: Nab-paclitaxel plus capecitabine may be an effective and safe first-line treatment strategy for patients with advanced or metastatic BTCs.

Capecitabine mitigates cardiac allograft rejection via inhibition of TYMS-Mediated Th1 differentiation in mice.

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies elucidated that capecitabine (CAP) works as an anti-tumor agent with putative immunosuppressive effects. However, the intricate mechanisms underpinning these effects remain to be elucidated. In this study, we aimed to unravel the molecular pathways by which CAP exerts its immunosuppressive effects to reduce allograft rejection. METHODS: Hearts were transplanted from male BALB/c donors to male C57BL/6 recipients and treated with CAP for seven days. The rejection of these heart transplants was assessed using a range of techniques, including H&E staining, immunohistochemistry, RNA sequencing, LS-MS/MS, and flow cytometry. In vitro, naïve CD4+ T cells were isolated and cultured under Th1 condition medium with varying treatments, flow cytometry, LS-MS/MS were employed to delineate the role of thymidine synthase (TYMS) during Th1 differentiation. RESULTS: CAP treatment significantly mitigated acute allograft rejection and enhanced graft survival by reducing graft damage, T cell infiltration, and levels of circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines. Additionally, it curtailed CD4+ T cell proliferation and the presence of Th1 cells in the spleen. RNA-seq showed that TYMS, the target of CAP, was robustly increased post-transplantation in splenocytes. In vitro, TYMS and its metabolic product dTMP were differentially expressed in Th0 and Th1, and were required after activation of CD4+ T cell and Th1 differentiation. TYMS-specific inhibitor, raltitrexed, and the metabolite of capecitabine, 5-fluorouracil, could inhibit the proliferation and differentiation of Th1. Finally, the combined use of CAP and the commonly used immunosuppressant rapamycin can induce long-term survival of allograft. CONCLUSION: CAP undergoes metabolism conversion to interfere pyrimidine metabolism, which targets TYMS-mediated differentiation of Th1, thereby playing a significant role in mitigating acute cardiac allograft rejection in murine models.

Efficacy and Safety of Metronomic Capecitabine in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Metronomic capecitabine has been found to be useful in several types of cancers such as pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, gastrointestinal cancers, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and metastatic colorectal cancer. This unique systematic literature review and meta-analysis was undertaken to assess the effectiveness and safety of metronomic capecitabine as a treatment regimen for hepatocellular carcinoma. METHOD: A systematic search of major databases was performed. Eight studies that dealt with the use of metronomic capecitabine for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were selected, seven were non-randomized control trials (n-RCTs), and one was a randomized control trial (RCT). Meta-analysis of these studies was performed using Review Manager v5.3 and STATA 15.1 software. The pooled prevalence of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), grade 1-2 adverse events (grade 1-2 AEs), grade 3-4 adverse events (grade 3-4 AEs) was determined, including publication bias and sensitivity analysis. RESULT: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, combining the pooled data of 476 patients from safety and efficacy studies. The pooled prevalence of disease control rate (DCR) and overall response rate (ORR) achieved with metronomic capecitabine was 36% (95% CI 32-41) and 7% (95% CI 5-9) respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were 3.57 months (95% CI 3.29-3.85) and 11.75 months (95% CI 10.56-12.95) respectively. The incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events (grade 3-4 AEs) and grade 1-2 adverse events (grade 1-2 AEs) was 38% (95% CI 32-44) and 73% (95% CI 67-79) respectively. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis highlights metronomic capecitabine as a potential treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the advanced stage. However, effective management of capecitabine's side effects is essential.

Clinicopathological and prognostic features of HER2-null and HER2-low advanced breast cancer treated with eribulin or capecitabine.

BACKGROUND: HER2-low populations constitute a heterogeneous group, and the cytotoxic anticancer agent efficacy based on HER2 status remains unclear. This study evaluated the clinicopathological features and outcomes of patients with advanced breast cancer showing HER2-low expression treated with eribulin or capecitabine, two treatment options after anthracycline and taxane treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients who were treated with eribulin or capecitabine between 2011 and 2015. HER2 status was evaluated according to the ASCO/CAP guidelines. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in overall survival (OS; eribulin: hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI 0.40-1.10; capecitabine: HR, 0.76; 95% CI 0.45-1.30) or progression-free survival (PFS; eribulin: HR, 1.13; 95% CI 0.72-1.78; capecitabine: HR, 0.90; 95% CI 0.56-1.44) between patients receiving eribulin (HER2-null: 35, HER2-low: 44) and those receiving capecitabine (HER2-null: 41, HER2-low: 33). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant differences in OS between the two groups in the hormone-positive and -negative populations for eribulin and capecitabine. HER2-null and HER2-low patients showed objective response rates (ORRs) of 22.5% and 9.1% (p = 0.09) overall, and 32.0% and 10.5% (p = 0.03), respectively, in hormone-positive cases among eribulin-treated patients. No response was observed in hormone-negative patients. Capecitabine treatment in HER2-null and HER2-low patients had overall ORRs of 26.8% and 15.2% (p = 0.23), respectively, with 27.3% and 16.1% (p = 0.28) for hormone-positive cases; and 25.0% and 0% (p = 1.0), respectively, for hormone-negative cases. CONCLUSIONS: Eribulin and capecitabine sensitivity may vary based on HER2 expression in patients with HER2-low and HER2-null breast cancer. Prognosis was similar between the HER2-low and the HER2-null groups.

Clinical effect analysis of different regimens of capecitabine in the treatment of patients with advanced colon cancer.

To assess the efficacy and safety of capecitabine in treating advanced colon cancer. Patients with advanced colon cancer were randomized into three groups: control group (n = 50, daily dose 2,500 mg/m2), the medium-dose group (n = 50, daily dose 2,000 mg/m2), and the low-dose group (n = 50, daily dose 1,500 mg/m2) capecitabine for 4 cycles(12 weeks). Afterwards, the response rate, quality of life, and adverse reactions of the three groups were collected for comparison. Efficacy rates were 50%, 70%, and 72%, respectively, with the low-dose group showing the highest efficacy (χ2 = 6.424, p = 0.040); Quality of life comparison results indicated significant differences in physical function (F = 98.528, p < 0.001), role function (F = 123.418, p < 0.001), social function(F = 89.539, p < 0.001), emotional function (6 F = 77.295, p < 0.001), cognitive function (F = 83.529, p < 0.001), and overall quality of life (F = 99.528, p < 0.001) among the three groups, and the three groups returned consistent scores, with the low-dose group scoring highest. Incidence rates were 86.00%, 46.00%, 34.00%, with the control group having the highest rate (χ2 = 16.505, p < 0.001). Capecitabine at a dosage of 1,500 mg/m2 demonstrated a good therapeutic effect and improved the quality of life in patients with advanced colon cancer, with a lower incidence of adverse reactions. A prolonged treatment cycle with reduced dosage is suggested to further improve treatment outcomes and patient prognosis. Trial registration The study was registered on clicaltrials.gov 'NCT06246461' on 30/01/2024.

Real-world data on adjuvant capecitabine after standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple negative breast cancer.

Objective: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has become the standard of care for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with tumors > 1 cm or positive axillary nodes. Pathologic complete response (pCR) has been used as an endpoint to select patients for treatment scaling. This study aimed to examine the benefit of adding adjuvant capecitabine for TNBC patients who did not achieve pCR after standard NACT in a real-world scenario. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included all patients with TNBC who underwent NACT between 2010 and 2020. Clinicopathological data were obtained from the patient records. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted at the 5 years follow-up period. Results: We included 153 patients, more than half of whom had stage III (58.2%) and high-grade tumors (60.8%). The overall pCR rate was 34.6%, and 41% of the patients with residual disease received adjuvant capecitabine. Disease-specific survival (DSS) among the patients who achieved pCR was significantly higher (p<0.0001). Residual disease after NACT was associated with detrimental effects on DSS. In this cohort, we did not observe any survival benefit of adding adjuvant capecitabine for patients with TNBC subjected to NACT who did not achieve pCR (p=0.52). Conclusion: Our study failed to demonstrate a survival benefit of extended capecitabine therapy in patients with TNBC with residual disease after NACT. More studies are warranted to better understand the indication of systemic treatment escalation in this scenario.

Discoloration and Dilemma: A Case Report of Hand-Foot Syndrome Associated With Capecitabine Use.

This case highlights the occurrence of hand-foot syndrome due to the use of an antimetabolite group of drugs, capecitabine, which was used in the chemotherapy of a 56-year-old male patient who was diagnosed with rectosigmoid carcinoma. The patient was diagnosed with rectosigmoid carcinoma two months ago and underwent laparoscopic lower anterior resection and colorectal anastomosis. Subsequently, the patient commenced chemotherapy treatment with a combination of oxaliplatin and capecitabine. The patient presented to us with complaints of loose stools for the past three days, and discoloration of the palms, soles, and tongue was noted and subjected to a biopsy, which revealed features compatible with chronic, nonspecific dermatitis. The occurrence of such palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia with capecitabine is yet to be extensively studied.

Lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis induced by oxaliplatin and capecitabine chemotherapy: A case report.

Oxaliplatin and capecitabine are instrumental in the adjunctive and palliative systemic management of colorectal cancer. The concurrent administration of these chemotherapeutic agents often results in adverse effects, such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, leukopenia, and hand-foot syndrome. However, reports of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) caused by oxaliplatin and capecitabine are scarce. In this case study, we report a rare occurrence of lower-extremity DVT triggered by synergistic oxaliplatin and capecitabine chemotherapy in a patient diagnosed with malignant colon cancer. During the initial cycle of chemotherapy, the patient demonstrated DVT within the intermuscular veins of the right calf and abnormalities in markers of coagulation function. Enlargement of the intermuscular venous thrombosis and an increase in coagulation markers were observed subsequent to the second chemotherapy cycle. From our experience of this case, we suggest that DVT is induced by oxaliplatin and capecitabine warrants vigilant attention. Risk assessment for DVT prior to chemotherapy, coupled with early detection and intervention, is crucial for DVT prevention. Furthermore, enhancing the awareness of health care professionals and patients about the potential of chemotherapy-induced DVT is of paramount importance. Consequently, this case carries significant clinical implications.

Phase Ib and pharmacokinetics study of alpelisib, a PIK3CA inhibitor, and capecitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Background: This phase Ib study was performed to determine the safety of combination capecitabine with alpleisib (phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase catalytic subunit p110α blockade) and determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase ll dose (RP2D) of this combination regimen in patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapy. The synergistic anti-tumor activity and pharmacokinetics (PK) were investigated. Methods: Dose escalation phases were conducted in patients with advanced solid cancers who were refractory to standard therapy regardless of PIK3CA mutation. Patients were administered orally once daily alpelisib (200mg and 300mg) and twice daily capecitabine (850mg, 1000mg, 1250mg orally, days 1-14) every 3 weeks. Standard "3 + 3" dose escalation was used to define the MTD. The effect of alpelisib on the PK of capecitabine was assessed. Results: Patients with 6 colorectal cancer (three PIK3CA mutation) and 6 breast cancer (all PIK3CA mutation) were enrolled. The first three patients in dose level 0 (alpelisib 200mg daily, capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily) had no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). In dose level 1 (alpelisib increased to 300 mg daily, capecitabine 1,000mg twice daily), one of six patients had DLT (grade (Gr) 3 hyperglycemia). When dose level 2 (alpelisib 300mg daily, capecitabine 1,250 mg/m2 twice daily) was expanded to 3 patients, no patients had DLTs. The combination of alpelisib 300mg daily and capecitabine 1,250 mg/m2 twice daily was declared as the MTD/RP2D in patients with advanced solid tumors. The most common AEs were Gr 1-3 hyperglycemia (75.0%). Frequent all-grade, treatment-related AEs included Gr 2-3 nausea (75.0%), Gr 1-2 diarrhea (50.0%), Gr 1-2 hand-foot syndrome (41.7%), Gr 1-2 anorexia (41.7%), Gr 2 mucositis (33.3%). Antitumor activity was observed in patients with PIK3CA mutant breast cancer (3 partial response and 3 stable disease of total 6 patients). Alpelisib exposure (Cmax and AUC0-12) was unaffected by concomitant capecitabine. There were no clinically relevant drug-drug interactions observed between alpelisib and capecitabine. Conclusions: The combination of alpelisib and capecitabine is generally tolerated, without pharmacokinetic interactions, and shows antitumor activity in patients with PIK3CA mutant advanced cancers.

The value of second-line anti-HER2 therapy in metastatic HER-2 positive patients: a cost-effectiveness analysis in China.

Background: Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide. The inevitability of drug resistance to initial anti-HER-2 therapy necessitates the emergence of second-line anti-HER-2 drugs which exhibit a promising outlook. Consequently, it is imperative to appraise their efficacy through network meta-analysis and ascertain their comparative cost-effectiveness. Methods: The data used in our analysis were acquired from patients enrolled in the EMILIA, DESTINY-Breast03, and PHOEBE phase III randomized clinical trials. A partitioned survival model was used for patients diagnosed with HER-2-positive metastatic Breast cancer. The model was crafted with a time horizon of 10 years, operating on a 21-day cycle and incorporating a 5% discount rate for both costs and outcomes. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set at $36,058.06 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). The impact of parameter uncertainty on the findings was assessed using a one-way deterministic sensitivity analysis and probability sensitivity analysis. Findings: Within the model encompassing 1782 patients, the utilization of pyrotinib plus capecitabine (PC) treatment yielded an additional 0.70 QALY in comparison to T-DM1, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $31,121.53 per QALY gained. Similarly, the administration of T-DXd treatment led to an additional 0.80 QALY compared to T-DM1, resulting in an ICER of $153,950.19 per QALY gained. The PC strategies are considered more cost-effective than T-DXd when the WTP threshold is set at $36,058.06 per QALY. However, this method is not cost effective for T-DXd. The probability of the PC strategies being cost-effective was 62%, whereas the probability of T-DXd was 0% when compared to T-DM1. Conclusion: PC is a cost-effective therapy for patients afflicted with HER-2-positive metastatic BC compared to T-DM1 from the perspective of China at a WTP threshold of $36,058.06 per QALY. Nevertheless, T-DXd is not as cost-effective as T-DM1, considering its current medication pricing. Therefore, reducing the cost of T-DXd could improve its overall cost-effectiveness.

Capecitabine-loaded NLC for Breast Cancer Treatment: Preparation, Characterization, and In vitro Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Cancer treatment often involves the use of potent antineoplastic drugs like Capecitabine [CAP], which can lead to serious toxicities. There is a need for dosage forms to manage these toxicities that can deliver the medication effectively to the target site while maintaining therapeutic efficacy at lower doses. To achieve the aforesaid objective, NLC containing capecitabine [NANOBIN] was prepared and evaluated. Different formulations of NANOBIN, denoted as CaTS, CaT1S, CaT2S, CaTS1, and CaTS2, were designed and evaluated to improve drug delivery and therapeutic outcomes. METHODS: The NANOBIN formulations were prepared using the hot homogenization method. The characterization of these formulations was conducted based on various parameters such as particle size, Polydispersity Index [PDI], Zeta Potential [ZP], Transmission Electron Microscopy [TEM] imaging, and Encapsulation Efficiency [EE]. In vitro evaluations included stability testing, release studies to assess drug release kinetics, and a cytotoxicity assay [MTT assay] to evaluate the efficacy of these formulations against human breast cancer cells [MCF-7]. RESULTS: The characterization results revealed that all NANOBIN formulations exhibited particle sizes ranging from 65 to 193 nm, PDI values within the range of 0.26-0.37, ZP values between 46.47 to 61.87 mV [-ve], and high EE percentages ranging from 94.121% to 96.64%. Furthermore, all NANOBIN formulations demonstrated sustained and slow-release profiles of CAP. The MTT assay showed that the NANOBINs exhibited significantly enhanced cytotoxic efficacy, approximately 10 times greater than free CAP when tested on MCF-7 cells. These findings indicate the potential of NANOBINs to deliver CAP effectively to the target site, enabling prolonged drug availability and enhanced therapeutic effects at lower doses. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that NANOBINs can effectively deliver CAP to target sites, prolonging drug exposure and enhancing therapeutic efficacy while reducing the required dose. Further studies are necessary to validate these findings and establish NANOBINs as a preferred treatment option for cancer therapy.

Management of metastatic pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas: when and what.

Recently, the treatment landscape for metastatic pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (MPPGL) has seen both progress and setbacks. We provide an up-to-date review of the multimodality management of MPPGL and discuss novel opportunities and current challenges in the treatment landscape. Given the unique clinical presentation of MPPGL, we discuss the management of hormone-related clinical sequelae and traditional modalities of therapy. Advances in the understanding of the molecular biology of these diverse tumors have enabled novel strategies such as augmenting DNA damage by targeted delivery of radionuclides such as 131I and 177Lu, abrogating tumor angiogenesis, hypoxia resistance, and DNA damage repair. Despite progress, we address the significant challenges still faced by patients and researchers engaged in efforts to improve outcomes in these rare cancers.

Shifting Paradigms in TNBC Treatment: Emerging Alternatives to Capecitabine in the Post-Neoadjuvant Setting.

BACKGROUND: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains a clinically challenging subtype due to its aggressive nature and limited treatment options post-neoadjuvant failure. Historically, capecitabine has been the cornerstone of adjuvant therapy for TNBC patients not achieving a pathological complete response (pCR). However, the integration of new modalities such as immunotherapy and PARP inhibitors has prompted a re-evaluation of traditional post-neoadjuvant approaches. METHODS: This review synthesizes data from pivotal clinical trials and meta-analyses to evaluate the efficacy of emerging therapies in the post-neoadjuvant setting. We focus on the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), PARP inhibitors (PARPis), and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) alongside or in place of capecitabine in TNBC treatment paradigms. RESULTS: The addition of ICIs like pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant regimens has shown increased pCR rates and improved event-free survival, posing new questions about optimal post-neoadjuvant therapies. Similarly, PARPis have demonstrated efficacy in BRCA-mutated TNBC populations, with significant improvements in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Emerging studies on ADCs further complicate the adjuvant landscape, offering potentially efficacious alternatives to capecitabine, especially in patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy. DISCUSSION: The challenge remains to integrate these new treatments into clinical practice effectively, considering factors such as drug resistance, patient-specific characteristics, and socio-economic barriers. This review discusses the implications of these therapies and suggests a future direction focused on personalized medicine approaches in TNBC. CONCLUSIONS: As the treatment landscape for TNBC evolves, the role of capecitabine is being critically examined. While it remains a viable option for certain patient groups, the introduction of ICIs, PARPis, and ADCs offers promising alternatives that could redefine adjuvant therapy standards. Ongoing and future trials will be pivotal in determining the optimal therapeutic strategies for TNBC patients with residual disease post-neoadjuvant therapy.