Antibody-drug conjugates-related interstitial lung diseases: data mining of the FAERS database.

BACKGROUND: Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) is a seriousadverse event (AE) associated with the use of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs).This study aims to delve deeply into the signals of AE associated with ILDlinked to ADCs using data mining methods. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on AEreports related to ADCs and ILD from the first quarter of 2004 to the fourthquarter of 2023 based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)database. Signal mining was performed using the reporting odds ratio (ROR)method and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) method. Data management, analysis, andvisualization were carried out using Python (Version 3.8), R software (Version4.2.1), and MySQL (Version 8.0.34). RESULTS: A total of 1389 AE reports related to ILD with eleventypes of ADCs as the primary suspected drugs were obtained. The age groups mostrepresented in these reports were 61-80 age group and 41-60 age group. Trastuzumab deruxtecan had the most ofreports. The data mining results indicated that ILD-related AE signals weredetected for eleven ADCs in the study. Trastuzumab deruxtecan showed thestrongest signals in both for ROR and MGPS methods. The median onset time ofADCs associated with ILD vary from 8 days to 207 days. CONCLUSIONS: The signals of ILD AE associated with ADCs arenotably strong. ILD should be closely monitored and assessed in the clinicaluse of ADCs taking full account of the efficacy and risks of the drugs as wellas the specific conditions of the patients.

Comparative analysis of adverse event risks in breast cancer patients receiving pembrolizumab combined with paclitaxel versus paclitaxel monotherapy: insights from the FAERS database.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the risk of adverse events (AEs) in breast cancer patients treated with pembrolizumab combined with paclitaxel versus those receiving pembrolizumab or paclitaxel monotherapy, using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Methods: Data were extracted from the FAERS database for breast cancer patients treated with pembrolizumab combined with paclitaxel or with pembrolizumab or paclitaxel monotherapy from Q1 2016 to Q2 2023. Disproportionation analysis was performed by calculating the reporting odds ratio (ROR) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI), the information component (IC), and the lower bound of the information component 95% confidence interval (IC025) to identify potential safety signals. Results: No significant difference in AEs was observed between the combined treatment group and the pembrolizumab monotherapy group. However, the combined treatment group exhibited a substantial increase in AE risk compared to the paclitaxel monotherapy group. The most significant increases in AE risk were adrenal insufficiency (ROR = 189.94, 95% CI 25.41-1419.7, IC = 3.37, IC025 = 1.59), hypophysitis (ROR = 99.46, 95% CI 12.72-777.4, IC = 3.31, IC025 = 1.44), and myocarditis (ROR = 69.5, 95% CI 8.55-565.23, IC = 3.25, IC025 = 1.33). The time-to-event for combined treatment was 35 (34-70) days, for pembrolizumab was 43 (35-90) days, and for paclitaxel was 42 (37-76) days. The combination therapy group demonstrated significantly shorter intervals to the onset of adrenal insufficiency (p = 0.008), myocarditis (p < 0.001), and immune-related enterocolitis (p = 0.009). Conclusion: Analysis of the FAERS database indicates that combination therapy significantly elevates the risk of adrenal insufficiency, myocarditis, hypophysitis, and immune-related enterocolitis compared to paclitaxel monotherapy. These findings provide critical insights for clinicians in predicting and managing potential AEs associated with this treatment regimen.

CAR-T therapy pulmonary adverse event profile: a pharmacovigilance study based on FAERS database (2017-2023).

Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, a rapidly emerging treatment for cancer that has gained momentum since its approval by the FDA in 2017, involves the genetic engineering of patients' T cells to target tumors. Although significant therapeutic benefits have been observed, life-threatening adverse pulmonary events have been reported. Methods: Using SAS 9.4 with MedDRA 26.1, we retrospectively analyzed data from the Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, covering the period from 2017 to 2023. The analysis included the Reporting Odds Ratio Proportional Reporting Ratio Information Component and Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean to assess the association between CAR-T cell therapy and adverse pulmonary events (PAEs). Results: The FAERS database recorded 9,400 adverse events (AEs) pertaining to CAR-T therapies, of which 940 (10%) were PAEs. Among these CAR-T cell-related AEs, hypoxia was the most frequently reported (344 cases), followed by respiratory failure (127 cases). Notably, different CAR-T cell treatments demonstrated varying degrees of association with PAEs. Specifically, Tisa-cel was associated with severe events including respiratory failure and hypoxia, whereas Axi-cel was strongly correlated with both hypoxia and tachypnea. Additionally, other CAR-T therapies, namely, Brexu-cel, Liso-cel, Ide-cel, and Cilta-cel, have also been linked to distinct PAEs. Notably, the majority of these PAEs occurred within the first 30 days post-treatment. The fatality rates varied among the different CAR-T therapies, with Tisa-cel exhibiting the highest fatality rate (43.6%), followed by Ide-cel (18.8%). Conclusion: This study comprehensively analyzed the PAEs reported in the FAERS database among recipients of CAR-T cell therapy, revealing conditions such as hypoxia, respiratory failure, pleural effusion, and atelectasis. These CAR-T cell therapy-associated events are clinically significant and merit the attention of clinicians and researchers.

Mortality and Serious Adverse Events Associated With Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists: A Pharmacovigilance Study Using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.

Purpose Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are an increasingly prevalent class of drugs for managing overweight/obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Postmarket surveillance is essential for characterizing their risk profiles in real-world patient populations as clinical use increases. This study investigated the association of GLP-1RAs with mortality and serious adverse events (AEs) reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods A disproportionality analysis was conducted utilizing FAERS data from Q2 2005 to Q1 2024 to identify AEs listing an approved GLP-1RA as the primary suspect drug. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was calculated for mortality and serious AEs associated with each GLP-1RA compared to the combined group of all other GLP-1RAs. A signal of disproportionate reporting indicating a potential safety concern was defined as a lower bound of the 95% CI for the ROR exceeding 1.0. Results The analysis identified 287,201 AEs associated with GLP-1RAs during the study period. Disproportionality analyses revealed statistically significant elevated signals for mortality with the earliest approved GLP-1RAs: Byetta (ROR = 2.20, 95% CI: 2.06-2.34) and Victoza (ROR = 2.12, 95% CI: 1.98-2.28). Significant elevated signals for serious AEs were identified with the semaglutide products Ozempic (ROR = 2.77, 95% CI: 2.69-2.85), Rybelsus (ROR = 2.42, 95% CI: 2.26-2.60), and Wegovy (ROR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.22-1.39); the liraglutide products Victoza (ROR = 2.10, 95% CI: 2.04-2.15) and Saxenda (ROR = 2.21, 95% CI: 2.09-2.33); and Byetta (ROR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.08-1.14) compared to other GLP-1RAs. The newer GLP-1RAs were associated with a higher proportion of serious AEs reported in younger patients (p < 0.001) and females (p < 0.001). Conclusion This pharmacovigilance study utilizing the FAERS database identified potential safety signals of increased mortality and serious AE reporting associated with certain GLP-1RAs, particularly the earlier approved liraglutide agents Byetta and Victoza. These findings highlight the importance of proactive postmarket surveillance to characterize the real-world safety profiles of individual GLP-1RA drugs.

Bisphosphonate- and disumab-related gingival disorders: case analysis from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.

Prior research has indicated that bisphosphonates (BPs) can improve periodontal disease because of their anti-osteoporosis properties. In vitro studies have shown that BPs induce cytotoxicity, inhibit wound healing, and thus affect periodontal disease. Denosumab and BPs have alternative indications. BP and denosumab are not known to correlate with gingival disorders. We assessed such a relationship by applying Bayesian and nonproportional analyses to data in the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. The study analyzed BPs and denosumab-reported incidents with preferred terms found in the narrow Standardized MedDRA Queries for gingival disorders. A total of 5863 reported cases of gingival disorders were associated with five BPs (alendronate, pamidronate, ibandronate, risedronate, and zoledronate) and denosumab. More than 15% of patients with gingival disorders related to BPs and denosumab other than denosumab were hospitalized over short- or long-term periods. Our findings indicated BPs and denosumab had significant reporting odds ratios (ROR), proportional reporting ratios (PRR), and information components (IC) with respect to gingival disorders. Pamidronate had the highest association (ROR = 64.58, PRR = 57.99, IC = 5.71), while the weakest association was found with denosumab (ROR = 3.61, PRR = 3.60, IC = 1.77). Significant associations were found between the six drugs and gingival pain, gingival recession, gingivitis, periodontal disease, and periodontitis. In conclusion, our comprehensive overview of the correlations, clinical characteristics, and prognoses of BPs and denosumab-related gingival disorders suggests that these issues deserve continued surveillance and appropriate management.

Ocular adverse events associated with antibody-drug conjugates in oncology: a pharmacovigilance study based on FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS).

Background: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have emerged as the focus and hotspots in the cancer field, yet the accompanying ocular toxicity has often been underestimated. We aimed to comprehensively and comparatively analyze the risk of ocular toxicity associated with various ADCs using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Methods: Data were extracted from the FAERS database from Q3 2011 to Q3 2023. We analyzed the clinical characteristics of ADCs-related ocular adverse events (AEs). These data were further mined by proportional analysis and Bayesian approach to detect signals of ADCs-induced ocular AEs. Moreover, the time to onset of ocular toxicity was also evaluated. Results: A total of 1,246 cases of ocular AEs were attributed to ADCs. Ocular toxicity signals were observed in patients treated with belantamab mafodotin, brentuximab vedotin, enfortumab vedotin, mirvetuximab soravtansine, sacituzumab govitecan, trastuzumab deruxtecan, and trastuzumab emtansine. Of these, belantamab mafodotin, trastuzumab emtansine, and mirvetuximab soravtansine, whose payloads are microtubule polymerization inhibitors, were more susceptible to ocular toxicity. The ten most common ADCs-related ocular AEs signals are keratopathy [ROR = 1,273.52, 95% CI (1,129.26-1,436.21)], visual acuity reduced [ROR = 22.83, 95% CI (21.2-24.58)], dry eye [ROR = 9.69, 95% CI (8.81-10.66)], night blindness [ROR = 259.87, 95% CI (228.23-295.89)], vision blurred [ROR = 1.78, 95% CI (1.57-2.02)], photophobia [ROR = 10.45, 95% CI (9.07-12.05)], foreign body sensation in eyes [ROR = 23.35, 95% CI (19.88-27.42)], ocular toxicity [ROR = 144.62, 95% CI (117.3-178.32)], punctate keratitis [ROR = 126.21, 95% CI (101.66-156.69)], eye disorder [ROR = 2.71, 95% CI (2.21-3.32)]. In terms of onset time, sacituzumab govitecan displayed an earlier onset of 21 days, while trastuzumab deruxtecan exhibited the latest onset of 223 days. Conclusion: ADCs may increase the risk of ocular toxicity in cancer patients, leading to serious mortality. With the widespread application of newly launched ADCs, combining the FAERS data with other data sources is crucial for monitoring the ocular toxicity of ADCs. In addition, novel ocular toxicity signals not documented in product labeling were detected. Further research will be necessary to validate our findings in the future.

Signal mining of adverse reactions in the antiemetic drug ondansetron during pregnancy: A real-world analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS).

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to assess the risks associated with the use of ondansetron in pregnant women in real-world based on the Food and Drug Administration adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). METHODS: The FAERS data from the 2017Q1 to the 2023Q1, which was used by the ratio-of-reporting (ROR) and Bayesian confidence interval progressive neural network (BCPNN) to assess the safety of ondansetron in pregnancy. RESULTS: A total of 15,727 pregnancy population reports were reported, with a total of 1,064 reports of adverse reactions with ondansetron as the primary suspected drug. Ondansetron was involved in a total of 10 system organ classifications (SOCs) of signal generation, and the top three signal intensities were Congenital, familial, and genetic disorders (ROR = 19.1, ROR025 = 17.03; IC = 1.23, IC025 = 1.16), Ear and labyrinth disorders (ROR = 17.11, ROR025 = 12.46; IC = 1.22, IC025 = 1.03), and Cardiac disorders (ROR = 9.48, ROR025 = 8.38; IC = 1.12, IC025 = 1.03); signals of adverse reactions obtained of 216, of which the main ones were Anhedonia (IC = 1.34, IC025 = 1.08), Injury (IC = 1.34, IC025 = 1.19), Left-to-right cardiac shunt (IC = 1.33, IC025 = 1.05). CONCLUSION: The adverse reactions of Ondansetron involve multiple systems and organs, which should cause clinical vigilance. However, due to the limitations of the data, the causal relationship and risk level of adverse reactions cannot be accurately inferred.

Adverse event profile of memantine and donepezil combination therapy: a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis based on FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) data from 2004 to 2023.

Background: Donepezil in combination with memantine is a widely used clinical therapy for moderate to severe dementia. However, real-world population data on the long-term safety of donepezil in combination with memantine are incomplete and variable. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the adverse events (AEs) of donepezil in combination with memantine according to US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data to provide evidence for the safety monitoring of this therapy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed reports of AEs associated with the combination of donepezil and memantine from 2004 to 2023 extracted from the FAERS database. Whether there was a significant association between donepezil and memantine combination therapy and AEs was assessed using four disproportionality analysis methods, namely, the reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker methods. To further investigate potential safety issues, we also analyzed differences and similarities in the time of onset and incidence of AEs stratified by sex and differences and similarities in the incidence of AEs stratified by age. Results: Of the 2,400 adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports in which the combination of donepezil and memantine was the primary suspected drug, most of the affected patients were female (54.96%) and older than 65 years of age (79.08%). We identified 22 different system organ classes covering 100 AEs, including some common AEs such as dizziness and electrocardiogram PR prolongation; fall, pleurothotonus and myoclonus were AEs that were not listed on the drug label. Moreover, we obtained 88 reports of AEs in men and 100 reports of AEs in women; somnolence was a common AE in both men and women and was more common in women, whereas pleurothotonus was a more common AE in men. In addition, we analyzed 12 AEs in patients younger than 18 years, 16 in patients between 18 and 65 years, and 113 in patients older than 65 years. The three age groups had distinctive AEs, but lethargy was the common AE among all age groups. Finally, the median time to AE onset was 19 days in all cases. In both men and women, most AEs occurred within a month of starting donepezil plus memantine, but some continued after a year of treatment. Conclusion: Our study identified potential and new AEs of donepezil in combination with memantine; some of these AEs were the same as in the specification, and some of the AE signals were not shown in the specification. In addition, there were sex and age differences in some of the AEs. Therefore, our findings may provide valuable insights for further studies on the safety of donepezil and memantine combination therapy, which are expected to contribute to the safe use of this therapy in clinical practice.

Signal mining and analysis of trifluridine/tipiracil adverse events based on real-world data from the FAERS database.

Objective: The objective of this research is to scrutinize adverse events (AEs) linked to Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TFTD/TPI), using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Methods: The AEs data related to TFTD/TPI were collected from the fourth quarter of 2015 through the fourth quarter of 2023. After normalizing the data, multiple signal quantification techniques including Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Bayesian approaches such as Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN) and the Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS) were used for overall and subgroup analysis and visualization analyses were performed. Results: From the FAERS database, we analyzed 13,520,073 reports, identifying 8,331 as primary suspect (PS) AEs for TFTD/TPI, occurring across 27 organ systems. The study retained 99 significant disproportionality Preferred Terms (PTs) across four algorithms and unveiled unexpected serious AEs such as iron deficiency and intestinal perforation, hepatic failure, cholangitis and so on. The median onset of TFTD/TPI-associated AEs was 44 days (IQR 20-97 days), with most occurring within the first 30 days of treatment. Conclusion: This research uncovers critical new safety signals for TFTD/TPI, supporting its clinical monitoring and risk identification.

Adverse events related to neuromuscular blocking agents: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system.

Background: Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are primarily used during surgical procedures to facilitate endotracheal intubation and optimize surgical conditions. This study aimed to explore the adverse event signals of NMBAs, providing reference for clinical safety. Methods: This study collected reports of atracurium, cisatracurium, rocuronium, and vecuronium as primary suspect drugs in The US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from the first quarter of 2004 to the third quarter of 2023. The adverse events (AEs) reported in the study were retrieved based on the Preferred Terms (PTs) of the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. In addition, we conducted disproportionality analysis on relevant reports using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) method and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) method. A positive signal was generated when both algorithms show an association between the target drug and the AE. Results: A total of 11,518 NMBA-related AEs were reported in the FAERS database. The most AEs of rocuronium were collected. NMBA-related AEs involved 27 different system organs (SOCs), all of the four NMBAs had positive signals in "cardiac disorders," "immune system disorders," "respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders" and "vascular disorders." At the PTs level, a total of 523 effective AEs signals were obtained for the four NMBAs. AEs labled in the instructions such as anaphylaxis (include anaphylactic reaction and anaphylactic shock), bronchospasm, respiratory arrest and hypotension were detected positive signals among all NMBAs. In addition, we also found some new AEs, such as ventricular fibrillation for the four NMBAs, hyperglycaemia for atracurium, kounis syndrome and stress cardiomyopathy for rocuronium, hepatocellular injury for cisatracurium, hyperkalaemia for vecuronium. To further investigated the AEs associated with serious clinical outcomes, we found that cardiac arrest and anaphylaxis were the important risk factors for death due to NMBAs. Conclusion: NMBA-related AEs have a significant potential to cause clinically severe consequences. Our study provides valuable references for the safety profile of NMBAs, and considering the limitations of the FAERS database, further clinical data are needed to validate the findings of this study.

Safety assessment of brexanolone in the FAERS database: real adverse event analysis and discussion of side effects.

BACKGROUND: Postpartum depression (PPD) is linked to hormonal changes. Brexanolone, the first FDA-approved drug for PPD, is a potential treatment. This study analyzes Brexanolone's safety using the FAERS database, highlighting its adverse effects and potential risk factors. METHODS: We analyzed FAERS data from Q3 2019 to Q3 2023, evaluating adverse reactions to Brexanolone. The analysis includes demographics, reporting regions, reporter identities, and types of adverse reactions. RESULTS: Most reports are from the United States, with consumers and physicians as primary reporters. Adverse reactions mainly involve severe systemic diseases, administration site reactions, injuries, intoxication, operational complications, and mental disorders. Specific adverse reactions include incorrect drug monitoring, PPD, intrusive thoughts, delayed treatment efficacy, sedation complications, product discontinuation, misuse, infusion site leakage and pain, and medication errors. CONCLUSION: The study confirms known safety information about Brexanolone and provides comprehensive data for medical practices and public health decisions. However, relying on spontaneous reports may introduce biases and incomplete information. Continued monitoring and reporting of adverse reactions to newer drugs like Brexanolone remain crucial.

Indications and adverse events of teriparatide: based on FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS).

Background: Teriparatide is approved for osteoporosis. Post-marketing surveillance is critical given its widespread use. Objective: To investigate adverse events (AEs) associated with teriparatide using the FAERS database, compare association strengths for key AEs, and explore potential applications to provide clinical reference. Methods: FAERS data from 2004 to 2023 were analyzed. Reports where teriparatide was the primary suspect drug were included. Adverse events were mapped to System Organ Classes and Preferred Terms. Disproportionality analysis using ROR, PRR, BCPNN and EBGM algorithms was conducted to detect safety signals. Results: Out of 107,123 reports with teriparatide as the primary suspect, key AEs identified included pain in extremity (PRR: 4.54), muscle spasms (PRR: 5.11), fractures (PRR range: 17.67-552.95), and increased calcium levels (PRR: 50.73). Teriparatide exhibited a stronger association with increased calcium levels (PRR: 50.73) compared to fractures (PRR range: 17.67-552.95). Notably, only 10.86% of AE reports were submitted by physicians and another 10% by other health professionals. Subset analyses showed a higher consistency of reported AEs from health professionals compared to the general dataset. Off-label uses were noted in conditions such as arthritis (0.57%) and cancer (0.12%). For osteoporosis, main AEs were pain (18.2%), fractures (12.4%), muscle spasms (7.7%), and nausea (6.5%), while glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis AEs included fractures (24.1%), pain (13.2%), decreased bone density (9.8%), and nausea (5.1%). Conclusion: Our findings provide real-world safety data on teriparatide, revealing key AEs and their association strengths. The low proportion of reports by healthcare professionals suggests the need for cautious interpretation. Continuous vigilance and further research are imperative to guide teriparatide's clinical use.

Are Alpha-2 Adrenergic Agonists Being Used in Infants?

Purpose: To identify and quantify adverse events (AEs) associated with alpha-2 adrenergic agonists prescribed for the treatment of glaucoma in infants. Methods: We queried the Federal Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from 2004-2023Q1 for AE reports related to brimonidine use in patients aged 12 months or younger. We then conducted a disproportionality analysis using data mining algorithms, including the reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, empirical bayes geometric mean, and information component to identify significant symptoms. Results: We identified 35 unique AE reports associated with brimonidine. Of these, 27 cases involved hospitalization, 13 cases involved life-threatening complications, 18 cases reported other complications, and 1 case involved a congenital anomaly. The most commonly reported AE was hypotonia, occurring in 20 cases. This was followed by other systemic symptoms, including hypothermia, depressed level of consciousness, lethargy, general toxicity, and pallor, among others. All symptoms were found to be significant in the disproportionality analysis. Notably, most cases were not known to involve an ophthalmic route of exposure. Conclusions: The use of alpha-2 adrenergic agonists in infants aged 1 year or younger has been associated with various systemic AEs, including hypotension, respiratory depression, and central nervous system depression. Ophthalmologists should be aware of these potential risks. Further, more rigorous warnings should be in place to prevent unintentional exposure of infants to brimonidine.

Comparative analysis of adverse events associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors based on FDA's adverse event reporting system: a case control pharmacovigilance study.

BACKGROUND: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors marked a milestone in the breast cancer treatment. Due to the potential impact of adverse effects on treatment decisions and patient outcomes, careful consideration of the varying toxicities of CDK4/6 inhibitors is crucial, as three inhibitors-palbociclib, abemaciclib, and ribociclib-have been approved with differences in adverse event profiles. However, limitations in clinical trials call for urgent real-world safety studies to evaluate and compare the risk of adverse events (AEs) among these CDK4/6 inhibitors. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze AEs of CDK4/6 inhibitors and provide insights for clinical drug selection, using real world database. METHODS: The AEs of CDK4/6 inhibitors in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (2015-2022) were analyzed. Four disproportionality methods were used to detect safety signals: reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian Confidence Neural Network Propagation, and Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker. Venn analysis was used to compare and select common and specific AEs. RESULTS: This study included 73,042 patients treated with palbociclib, 25,142 with ribociclib, and 7563 with abemaciclib. All three inhibitors had 27 common AEs. Palbociclib exhibited the highest ROR for hematologic toxicities, while ribociclib showed the highest ROR for macrocytosis, nail disorders, and hepatic lesions. Abemaciclib displayed the highest ROR for mucosal toxicity. Common signals for both palbociclib and ribociclib included hematologic toxicities, decreased immune responsiveness, and aphthous ulcers. Myelosuppression, oral pain, and pseudocirrhosis were common signals for palbociclib and abemaciclib. Anemia, hepatotoxicity, and pneumonitis were observed as common signals for ribociclib and abemaciclib. Furthermore, specific AEs associated with palbociclib included fatigue, alopecia, and stomatitis. For ribociclib, specific AEs included electrocardiogram QT prolongation, thrombocytopenia, and decreased hemoglobin. Abemaciclib was specifically linked to diarrhea, vomiting, and interstitial lung disease. CONCLUSION: Our analysis revealed that palbociclib showed a higher risk of hematologic toxicity. Ribociclib showed higher risks of hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and QT prolongation. Abemaciclib showed higher risks of hepatotoxicity, gastrointestinal effects, interstitial lung disease, and thrombosis. These findings provide valuable insights for CDK4/6 inhibitor selection.

Post-marketing safety of finerenone: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system.

BACKGROUND: Finerenone was approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes patients with chronic kidney disease. However, the post-marketing safety of finerenone in the real world is unknown. METHODS: The quarterly reported data related to finerenone from the third quarter of 2021 to the second quarter of 2023 were collected by using the FAERS database. Two disproportionality analysis methods were estimated by using Reporting odds ratio (ROR) and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN). RESULTS: A total of 1067 adverse events (AEs) were included. Twenty-four kinds of system organ classes (SOCs) were classified for the organs and systems involved and 39 AEs with significant safety signals were identified using ROR and BCPNN at the preferred terms (PTs) level. Most AEs originated from the United States, and the median time to onset of AEs was 13 days. Three hundred and fifty-one (55.5%) reported serious outcome. The proportion of medication combinations was 29.0%. The most commonly reported AEs were the glomerular filtration rate decreased. Safety signals have also been observed in new and unexpected AEs. CONCLUSION: The analysis of the AE signals may contribute to minimizing the risks associated with its use.

Detection and analysis of the safety profile of talazoparib based on FAERS database.

BACKGROUND: Talazoparib was approved for the treatment of breast cancer. However, the safety of talazoparib in a large population sample over an extended period remained uncertain. The objective of this study is to offer guidance for the secure utilization of talazoparib in clinical settings. METHODS: Four algorithms were used to quantify the signals of talazoparib associated adverse events(AEs), using data from the food and drug administration adverse event reporting system(FAERS) between fourth quater of 2018 and second quater of 2023. RESULTS: A total of 7,186,517 records were reported, with 737 indicating talazoparib as the primary suspected (PS) AEs. A total of 40 significant preferred terms (PTs) that adhere to the four algorithms were simultaneously retained. There is a possibility of experiencing unforeseen and noteworthy AEs, including embolism(0.46%), pulmonary embolism(1.06%), hyponatremia(0.46%), hypokalemia(0.40%), hematuria(0.33%), and pericardial effusion(0.26%). Most of the AEs related to talazoparib occurred within the initial month of starting the medication, with a median onset time of 79 days (IQR: 22-207 days). CONCLUSION: Results of our study were consistent with clinical observations, and we also found potential new and unexpected AEs signals for talazoparib, suggesting prospective clinical studies were needed to confirm these results and illustrate their relationship. Our results may provide valuable evidence for further safety studies of talazoparib.

Pharmacovigilance analysis of orlistat adverse events based on the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database.

Objective: Based on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, we analyzed the signals of potential adverse events (AEs) of orlistat in the real world to provide a reference for its safe clinical use. Methods: The FAERS database and OpenVigil 2.1 were used to obtain data on adverse events of orlistat from the first quarter of 2004 to the first quarter of 2023, and to analyze the population in which the adverse events occurred. And the signals of their potential adverse events were mined using reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) and empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM). Result: A total of 21,079 reports of adverse events with orlistat as the primary suspected drug were collected in this study. Using four disproportionate analyses, we screened 117 preferred terms (PTs) involving 18 system organ classes (SOCs). We found that the most common adverse events at SOC level for orlistat remained "gastrointestinal disorders", while "metabolism and nutrition disorders", "renal and urinary disorders", "musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders" and "hepatobiliary disorders" also ranked high in the number of case reports. In addition, at the PT level, we identified several new signals of adverse events not mentioned in the specification, including "lipiduria", "anal haemorrhage", "rectal haemorrhage", "haematochezia", "sigmoiditis", "diverticulitis" and "muscle spasms". Conclusion: Most of the adverse events found in this study are consistent with the results described in the drug label. At the same time, we also found some new adverse events, which require more prospective studies to verify and elucidate their relationship with orlistat.

Differences in hypersensitivity reactions and gadolinium deposition disease/symptoms associated with gadolinium exposure to gadolinium-based contrast agents: new insights based on global databases VigiBase, FAERS, and IQVIA-MIDAS.

BACKGROUND: Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) can occur unexpectedly and be life-threatening when gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are used. Gadolinium deposition disease (GDD) and symptoms associated with gadolinium exposure (SAGE) have been controversial for a long time. However, similar studies are currently incomplete or outdated. Therefore, comparing the safety of different GBCAs in terms of HSRs and GDD/SAGE using the latest post-marketing safety data should yield further insights into safely using GBCAs. METHODS: The safety differences between all GBCAs to GDD and the spectrum of GBCA-related HSRs were all compared and analyzed by using the World Health Organization database VigiBase and the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database in this study. A further analysis of SAGE was also conducted using FAERS data. The lower limit of the reporting odds ratio (ROR) 95% confidence interval was used for signal detection. Moreover, the frequency of HSRs was calculated by dividing the number of reports in VigiBase by the total sales volume (measured in millions) from 2008 to 2022 in the IQVIA Multinational Integrated Data Analysis System. All adverse events were standardized using the Medical Dictionary for Drug Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) 26.0. RESULTS: This study shows that all GBCAs have the potential to induce HSRs, with nonionic linear GBCAs exhibiting a comparatively lower signal. According to standardized MedDRA query stratification analysis, gadobutrol had a greater ROR025 for angioedema. The ROR025 of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadoteridol is larger for anaphylactic/anaphylactoid shock conditions. Regarding severe cutaneous adverse reactions, only gadoversetamide and gadodiamide showed signals in FAERS and VigiBase. There were also differences in the frequency of HSRs between regions. Regarding GDD, gadoterate meglumine, and gadoteridol had a lower ROR025. An analysis of the 29 preferred terms linked to SAGE indicated that special consideration should be given to the risk of skin induration associated with gadoversetamide, gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadobenate dimeglumine, gadodiamide, and gadoteridol. Additionally, gadodiamide and gadoteridol pose a greater risk of skin tightness compared to other GBCAs. CONCLUSIONS: The risk differences among GBCAs using data from several sources were compared in this study. However, as a hypothesis-generating method, a clear causal relationship would require further research and validation.

Drug-associated porphyria: a pharmacovigilance study.

BACKGROUND: The potentially fatal attacks experienced by porphyria carriers are triggered by various porphyrinogenic drugs. However, determining the safety of particular drugs is challenging. METHODS: We retrospectively used the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to identify drugs associated with porphyria as an adverse event (AE) extracted from data from January 2004 to March 2022. The associated search terms included "Porphyria," "Porphyria screen," "Porphyria non-acute," "Porphyria acute," "Acquired porphyria," and "Pseudoporphyria." Signal mining analysis was performed to identify the association between drugs and AEs by four algorithms, namely the reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker. RESULTS: FAERS reported 1470 cases of porphyria-related AEs, and 406 drugs were screened after combining trade and generic names. All four algorithms identified 52 drugs with signals. The characteristics of all the reports and signaling drugs were analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of drug-associated porphyria that provides critical information on drug porphyrogenicity, facilitating rational and evidence-based drug prescription and improving the accuracy of porphyrogenicity prediction based on model algorithms. Moreover, this study serves a reference for clinicians to ensure that porphyrinogenic drugs are not prescribed to carriers of porphyria genetic mutations.

Adverse event reporting of the IGF-1R monoclonal antibody teprotumumab: a real-world study based on the US food and drug administration adverse event reporting system.

Background: Teprotumumab, an IGF-1R monoclonal antibody, has shown significant efficacy in treating thyroid eye disease (TED). However, since teprotumumab was launched in 2020 and first approved in the United States, there were limited reports of post-marketing adverse events (AEs). In this study, we aimed to mine and analyze the AEs signals with teprotumumab on the basis of the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to provide instructions in clinical practice concerning adverse reactions and assistance in drug development and import/export into other countries. Methods: All AE reports were obtained from the FAERS database from the first quarter of 2020 to the fourth quarter of 2023. To comprehensively analyze the AEs, we applied four disproportionality analysis algorithms, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) algorithms. Results: A total of 687 reports from 200 patients related to administration of teprotumumab were obtained, and 78% of the cases was female. Signal detection of teprotumumab at the system organ class (SOC) level included gastrointestinal disorders, ear and labyrinth disorders, general disorders and administration site conditions, nervous system disorders, and musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders. AEs that ranked top five at the preferred terms (PTs) level were muscle spasms, fatigue, tinnitus, headache, and deafness. The median time to those AEs onsets was 48 days (interquartile range 19.0-92.0 days) after administering drugs. Additionally, our results indicated the AEs in reproductive system and breast disorders because the prevalence of TED was more common in women. Conclusion: This study identified many AEs associated with teprotumumab and unveiled potential new AE signals. These results can provide valuable evidence for further clinical application of teprotumumab and are important in enhancing clinical medication safety.