Incarceration of a part of the gastric wall into the abdominal cavity in a patient with hiatal hernia and complete dislocation of the stomach (upside-down stomach).

An upside-down stomach is a rare type of hiatal hernia. An 83-year-old woman presented to the emergency room with abdominal pain and vomiting. Computed tomography revealed an upside-down stomach and the incarceration of a part of the gastric body into the abdominal cavity. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed a circular ulcer caused by gastric ischemia. Although she was discharged after 1 week of conservative therapy, she was readmitted to the hospital 1 day after discharge because of a recurrence of hiatal hernia incarceration. She underwent laparoscopic surgery 4 days after readmission and recovered successfully.

Sigmoid Volvulus in the Setting of Type 4 Hiatal Hernia: An Uncommon Presentation and Literature Review.

Hiatal hernias occur when intra-abdominal contents protrude into the diaphragmatic opening. Of the four classifications, Type 4 hiatal hernias are the most rare and severe. They develop from herniation of the gastroesophageal junction and abdominal viscera other than the stomach into the thoracic cavity. The resulting increase in intrathoracic pressure can cause a wide variety of symptoms on presentation and potentially lead to misdiagnosis. We present a rare case in which a 78-year-old woman presented with nonspecific symptoms and was diagnosed with incarcerated Type 4 hiatal hernia with sigmoid volvulus. We also report a literature review from 2015 to emphasize the importance of recognizing diverse symptomatic presentations in complex Type 4 hiatal hernias and the need for a comprehensive evaluation, as early detection and prompt intervention are essential in preventing life-threatening complications.

Hiatal Hernia With Ulcer at the Gastroesophageal Junction Presenting With Progressive Dysphagia and Epigastric Pain: A Case Report.

A hiatal hernia occurs when the contents of the abdominal cavity, most often the stomach, protrude into the chest cavity through the esophageal hiatus. The hiatus is an elliptical-shaped outlet, typically formed by parts of the right diaphragmatic crus surrounding the distal esophagus. This ailment can transpire due to either the broadening of the specific diaphragmatic opening or a shortening in the overall length of the esophagus, leading to herniation of the stomach into the thoracic region. Raised pressure in the abdominal region may also be one of the culprits. Patients with a hiatal hernia usually remain asymptomatic, but patients might have difficulty swallowing both liquids and solids in the advanced stages of the disease. The disease is rarely accompanied by reflux of gastric acid into the esophagus due to decreased activity of the lower esophageal sphincter, leading to increased complaints of epigastric pain and ulceration near the gastroesophageal junction. Long-standing cases can increase the risk of developing Barrett's esophagus with dysplasia, which may advance to esophageal carcinoma in later stages. Advanced age and obesity are significant risk factors for hiatal hernia. Obese individuals, in particular, experience higher intra-abdominal pressure, which significantly raises the likelihood of developing a hiatal hernia. The hernia may be diagnosed through an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy or radiologically through a chest X-ray in the posterior-anterior view, defining the border of the esophagus. Hence, this facilitates a more seamless and precise diagnosis. Surgical fundoplication treatment improves the patient's condition better than solitary medical management. Overall, addressing the condition surgically often yields more favorable outcomes and enhances the patient's quality of life. Hiatal hernia usually presents with no or minimal clinical manifestations. Thus, this case report highlights the importance of comprehensive clinical management of such cases.

Robotic Repair of a Paraesophageal Hernia After an Open Nissen Fundoplication: Case Presentation and Clinical Discussion.

We present a female in her sixties with a recurrent paraesophageal hernia status post open Nissen fundoplication and multiple esophageal dilations who underwent a robotic paraesophageal hernia repair, with extensive lysis of adhesions. The stomach and esophagus were dissected off the crura and the previous wrap was undone. Once the entirety of the stomach and esophagus were freed from their surrounding structures, the hernia sac was able to be excised. The crural defect was closed and gastropexy was performed. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and was discharged home. This case is presented to provide evidence that robotic repair presents a viable option in the reoperation of patients following an open Nissen fundoplication as well as provide an overview of the types of hiatal hernias and the indications and options for surgical intervention.

Perioperative outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a NSQIP analysis.

BACKGROUND: Studies comparing outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repairs have yielded conflicting results. We sought to analyze early postoperative complications between these approaches using a newly available NSQIP variable indicating robot use. METHODS: We queried the 2022 ACS NSQIP database for adult patients undergoing elective minimally invasive hiatal hernia repair. Chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare cohort characteristics. Logistic, linear, and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to compare perioperative outcomes between the laparoscopic and robotic groups. RESULTS: We identified 4345 patients who underwent repair using a laparoscopic (2778 patients; 63.9%) or robotic (1567 patients; 36.1%) approach. Most (73.1%) were female, and the median age was 65 (IQR 55, 73). Patients who underwent robotic repair were younger (median age 64 vs 66), had a slightly higher body mass index (BMI; median 30.2 vs 29.9), and were more likely to have hypertension (53.0% vs 48.5%), all p < 0.01. On unadjusted analysis the robotic approach was associated with decreased 30-day mortality (0.0% vs 0.4%, p < 0.01). After adjusting for age, gender, race, BMI, and hypertension, the robotic approach was not associated with increased major complications (5.6% vs 5.1%, AOR 1.13, 95% CI 0.86, 1.49), minor complications (0.9% vs 1.5%, AOR 1.20, 95% CI 0.74, 1.93), or unplanned readmission (6.5% vs 5.5%, AHR 1.17, 95% CI 0.89, 1.54), all p ≥ 0.26. After adjusting for age and hypertension, the robotic cohort had an increased risk of myocardial infarction (AOR 2.53, 95% CI 1.01, 6.33, p = 0.048) and pulmonary embolism (AOR 2.76, 95% CI 1.17, 6.49, p = 0.02), although none resulted in 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic and laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repairs had similar overall complication and readmission rates. The robotic cohort had an increased risk of myocardial infarction and pulmonary embolism but no 30-day mortality. Current data support the use of both robotic and laparoscopic approaches for paraesophageal hernia repair.

Efficient artificial intelligence-based assessment of the gastroesophageal valve with Hill classification through active learning.

Standardized assessment of the gastroesophageal valve during endoscopy, attainable via the Hill classification, is important for clinical assessment and therapeutic decision making. The Hill classification is associated with the presence of hiatal hernia (HH), a common endoscopic finding connected to gastro-esophageal reflux disease. A novel efficient medical artificial intelligence (AI) training pipeline using active learning (AL) is designed. We identified 21,970 gastroscopic images as training data and used our AL to train a model for predicting the Hill classification and detecting HH. Performance of the AL and traditionally trained models were evaluated on an external expert-annotated image collection. The AL model achieved accuracy of 76%. A traditionally trained model with 125% more training data achieved 77% accuracy. Furthermore, the AL model achieved higher precision than the traditional one for rare classes, with 0.54 versus 0.39 (p < 0.05) for grade 3 and 0.72 versus 0.61 (p < 0.05) for grade 4. In detecting HH, the AL model achieved 94% accuracy, 0.72 precision and 0.74 recall. Our AL pipeline is more efficient than traditional methods in training AI for endoscopy.

Comparative analysis of robotic and laparoscopic techniques in hiatal hernia and crural repair: a review of current evidence and outcomes.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this narrative review is to evaluate the implementation of robotic surgery in hiatal hernia and crural repair, based on the existing literature and to compare this approach to other established techniques. METHODS: We performed a non- systematic literature search of PubMed and MEDLINE on February 25, 2024 for papers published to date focusing on the surgical repair of hiatal hernias using the robotic platform. After eliminating publications based on eligibility criteria, 13 studies were selected for analysis. RESULTS: Robotic surgery is increasingly utilized in hiatal hernia repair due to its enhanced ergonomics and superior visualization capabilities. Operative times vary, with some studies indicating longer durations for robotic surgery (e.g., Giovannetti et al. demonstrated median operative time of 196 min for robotic compared to 145 min for laparoscopic) while others report shorter times (e.g., Lang F et al. demonstrated 88 min for robotic versus 102 min for laparoscopic). Recurrence rates between robotic and laparoscopic repairs are comparable, with reported recurrence rates of 1.8% for robotic and 1.2% for laparoscopic approaches by Benedix et al. Robotic surgery offers potential advantages, including reduced intraoperative blood loss (e.g., Giovannetti et al. mentioned median blood loss of 20 ml for robotic versus 50 ml for laparoscopic). The length of hospital stay and postoperative complication rates also vary, with some studies suggesting shorter stays and fewer complications for robotic surgery as surgeons become more proficient. Soliman et al. reported a statistically significant reduction in complication rates with robotic surgery (6.3% versus 19.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Robotic surgery presents promising results regarding the length of hospital stay, conversion rate to open surgery and postoperative complication rates when compared to laparoscopy based on the existing literature. Despite the lack of striking differences, robotic hiatal hernia repair is a valid and evolving approach.

Spontaneous Mediastinal Gastric Perforation in Hiatal Hernia with Difficult Surgical Technique Selection: A Case Report.

Emergency surgery for a hiatal hernia (HH) is uncommon. However, mediastinal gastric perforation may occasionally present as the initial symptom of HH and demonstrate high mortality rates. Managing mediastinal gastric perforation in HH has no established standard surgical technique, and the selection of surgical techniques may be challenging. A 78-year-old female patient was referred to our department because of an upper gastrointestinal perforation in HH based on computed tomography (CT) results. Determining the possibility of esophageal perforation and intrathoracic penetration was difficult according to CT results alone, and whether a transthoracic or transabdominal approach was preferable. We diagnosed the patient with a mediastinal gastric perforation in HH without intrathoracic penetration based on an additional gastrointestinal contrast study and a right thoracentesis. We treated the patient with laparotomy, involving the perforation site and esophageal hiatus closure and gastropexy. Postoperatively, the patient experienced complications associated with delayed gastric emptying and aspiration pneumonia. Fortunately, no severe infections, such as residual abscess formation or empyema, were observed, and the recovery progressed favorably. Mediastinal gastric perforation should be considered a differential diagnosis for elderly patients with sudden-onset chest pain and dyspnea, and the threshold for imaging should be lowered. Identifying the perforation site and the presence of intrathoracic penetration based on preoperative results is useful for determining the appropriate surgical technique. Postoperative quality of life to the extent feasible needs to be considered, as the selection of surgical technique may cause subsequent recurrence or reflux symptoms.

Anterior Abdominal Wall Necrotizing Fasciitis Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy With Hiatal Hernia Repair: A Case Report.

Necrotizing fasciitis (NF), commonly known as necrotizing soft tissue infection (NSTI), or flesh-eating disease is a rare but rapidly fatal aggressive bacterial infection of soft tissue and deep skin that results in the destruction of the underlying fascia. Symptoms include fever, tachycardia, hypotension, leukocytosis, pain, and large areas of red and swollen skin. Early diagnosis and aggressive management are compulsory for a better prognosis. In this case report, we present a 58-year-old obese woman who initially presented to the emergency department three weeks post-sleeve gastrectomy with hernia repair and was initially suspected of having a large, uncomplicated abdominal wall abscess. Several repeated drainages of the abdominal wall abscess and continued deterioration of the patient revealed foul-smelling, necrotic tissue and the subsequent diagnosis of NF. This case report highlights the importance of high clinical suspicion for NF and early, aggressive debridement and treatment to improve patient outcomes.

SAGES guidelines for the surgical treatment of hiatal hernias.

BACKGROUND: Hiatal hernia (HH) is a common condition. A multidisciplinary expert panel was convened to develop evidence-based recommendations to support clinicians, patients, and others in decisions regarding the treatment of HH. METHODS: Systematic reviews were conducted for four key questions regarding the treatment of HH in adults: surgical treatment of asymptomatic HH versus surveillance; use of mesh versus no mesh; performing a fundoplication versus no fundoplication; and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) versus redo fundoplication for recurrent HH. Evidence-based recommendations were formulated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations methodology by subject experts. When the evidence was insufficient to base recommendations on, expert opinion was utilized instead. Recommendations for future research were also proposed. RESULTS: The panel provided one conditional recommendation and two expert opinions for adults with HH. The panel suggested routinely performing a fundoplication in the repair of HH, though this was based on low certainty evidence. There was insufficient evidence to make evidence-based recommendations regarding surgical repair of asymptomatic HH or conversion to RYGB in recurrent HH, and therefore, only expert opinions were offered. The panel suggested that select asymptomatic patients may be offered surgical repair, with criteria outlined. Similarly, it suggested that conversion to RYGB for management of recurrent HH may be appropriate in certain patients and again described criteria. The evidence for the routine use of mesh in HH repair was equivocal and the panel deferred making a recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations should provide guidance regarding surgical decision-making in the treatment of HH and highlight the importance of shared decision-making and consideration of patient values to optimize outcomes. Pursuing the identified research needs will improve the evidence base and may allow for stronger recommendations in future evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of HH.

Presentation and management of post-esophagectomy or Gastrectomy Hiatal Hernia.

PURPOSE: Hiatal hernia may development after esophagectomy or Gastrectomy. Post- esophago-gastric hiatal hernia is a rare but challenging condition. Nearly half of reported cases involve emergent situations, underscoring the urgency of addressing this condition. However, there is currently no consensus on the optimal treatment approach for this type of hernia. METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent repair for Post- esophago-gastric hiatal hernia over the past five years were retrospectively reviewed. Patient characteristics and perioperative data were collected. The primary outcomes, repair methods, and surgical results following post-esophago-gastric hiatal repair were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of eight patients with post-esophago-gastric hiatal hernia were included in this study. All patients presented with emergent conditions, specifically bowel obstruction. Laparoscopic repair was successful in four cases, with a conversion rate to open surgery of 50% (4 out of 8). Primary suture was performed in three cases, while biological mesh repair was carried out in four cases, and one case was left unrepaired. Bowel gangrene and perforation occurred in one case. The most notable postoperative complications included wound infection and pleural fluid collection. Importantly, there were no instances of hernia recurrence during the follow-up period, which ranged from 2 to 55 months, with a 100% follow-up rate observed. CONCLUSION: Post-esophago-gastric hiatal hernia is a rare yet significant condition, often presenting emergently and linked to higher morbidity and mortality rates. Therefore, symptomatic patients warrant surgical repair, and immediate intervention should be provided to those with acute-onset symptoms and clinical signs of bowel obstruction. Primary suture repair, with or without biological mesh, appears to be a durable method of repair.

Forgoing Preoperative Manometry for Minimally Invasive Hiatal Hernia Repair.

INTRODUCTION: Hiatal hernia commonly occurs in adults. Although most patients are asymptomatic, some experience reflux symptoms or dysphagia. These patients are frequently managed with acid suppression and lifestyle changes. However, medical management does not provide durable relief for some patients; therefore, surgical repair is considered. Routine preoperative investigations include esophagoscopy, esophagography, and manometry. We investigated the role of preoperative motility studies for the management of these patients when partial fundoplication is planned. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 185 patients who underwent elective minimally invasive hiatal hernia repair with partial fundoplication between 2014 and 2018. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether a preoperative motility study was performed. The primary outcomes were postoperative dysphagia, complications, postoperative interventions, and use of proton pump inhibitors. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients underwent preoperative manometry and 86 did not. The lack of preoperative manometry was not associated with increased postoperative morbidity, including leak rate, readmission, and 30-d mortality. The postoperative dysphagia rates of the manometry and nonmanometry groups were 5% (5/99 patients) and 7% (6/86 patients) (P = 0.80), respectively. Furthermore, seven of 99 (7%) patients in the manometry group and 10 of 86 (12%) (P = 0.42) patients in the nonmanometry group underwent interventions, mainly endoscopic dilation, postoperatively owing to symptom recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Forgoing preoperative manometry was not associated with significant adverse outcomes after minimally invasive hiatal hernia repair. Although manometry is reasonable to perform, it should not be considered a mandatory part of the preoperative assessment when partial fundoplication is planned.

RISK OF DE NOVO BARRETT'S ESOPHAGUS POST SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF STUDIES WITH LONG TERM FOLLOW UP.

BACKGROUND: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is one of the most commonly performed bariatric procedures worldwide. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a major concern in patients undergoing SG and is a risk factor for Barrett's esophagus (BE). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the incidence of and analyze predictive factors for post-SG BE. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in April 2024, for studies reporting on incidence of BE, erosive esophagitis (EE) and hiatal hernia (HH) post SG. Primary outcomes were post SG pooled rates of de novo BE, EE, GERD symptoms, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and HH. Meta-regression analysis was performed to assess if patient and post SG factors influenced the rates of post SG BE. RESULTS: Nineteen studies with 2046 patients (79% females) were included. Mean age was 42.2 years (SD 11.1) and follow up ranged from 2 to 11.4 years. The pooled rate of de novo BE post SG was 5.6% (CI 3.5-8.8). Significantly higher pooled rates of EE [Risk Ratio (RR) 3.37], HH [RR 2.09], GER/GERD symptoms [RR 3.32] and PPI use [RR 3.65], were found among patients post SG. GER/GERD symptoms post SG positively influenced the pooled BE rates, while age, sex, BMI, post SG EE and HH did not. CONCLUSION: Our analysis shows that SG results in a significantly increased risk of de novo BE and higher rates of EE, PPI use and HH. Our findings suggest that clinicians should routinely screen patients with SG for BE and future surveillance intervals should be followed as per societal guidelines.

The classification of hiatal shapes and their use as a marker for complexity, operative interventions, and recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Diaphragmatic reconstruction is a vital, but challenging component of hiatal hernia and antireflux surgery. Results are optimized by minimizing axial tension along the esophagus, assessed with intra-abdominal length, and radial tension across the hiatus, which has not been standardized. We categorized hiatal openings into 4 shapes, as a surrogate for radial tension, to correlate their association with operative interventions and recurrence. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all primary hiatal hernias (≥3 cm) repaired at a single center between 2010 and 2020. Patients with intraoperative hiatal photos with at least 1 year of follow-up were included. The hiatal openings were classified into 4 shapes: slit, inverted teardrop, "D," and oval, and ordered in this manner of hypothesized increased complexity and tension. RESULTS: A total of 239 patients were studied, with 113 (47%) having a recurrence. Age (P < .001), proportion of paraesophageal hernias (P < .001), hernia axial length (P < .001), and hiatal width (P < .001) all increased as shape progressed from slit to inverted teardrop to "D" to oval. Mesh (P = .003) and relaxing incisions (P < .001) were more commonly employed in more advanced shapes, "D" and ovals. However, recurrence (P = .88) did not correlate with hiatal shape. CONCLUSION: Four different hiatal shapes are commonly seen during hernia repair. These shapes represent a spectrum of hernia chronicity and complexity necessitating increased use of operative measures but not correlating with recurrence. Despite failing to be a direct marker for recurrence risk, hiatal shape may serve as an intraoperative tool to inform surgeons of the potential need for additional hiatal interventions.

Reducing recurrence rates in hiatal hernia repair: Results of a quality improvement study.

BACKGROUND: Patient and procedure factors are considered in the decision-making process for surgical repair of hiatal hernias. Recurrence is multi-factorial and has been shown to be related to size, type, BMI and age. AIMS: This study examined recurrence rates in a single institution, identified areas for improved surgical technique, and re-assessed recurrence following implantation of a quality improvement initiative. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing hiatal hernia repair surgery between 2018 and 2022 was conducted. Demographics, pre-operative characteristics, intra-operative procedures and recurrence rates were reviewed. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients from 2018 to 2020 and 34 patients from 2021 to 2022 were identified. The recurrence rate was 21% in 2018-2020, with 14% requiring a revisional procedure. Recurrence and re-operation were subsequently reduced to 6% in 2021 and 2022, which was statistically significant (p = 0.043). There was an increase in gastropexy from 21% to 41% following the review (p = 0.032), which was mainly reserved for large and giant hernias. Procedural and literature review, alongside gastropexy, can be attributed to recurrence rate reduction. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to educate patients on the likelihood and risk factors of recurrence. A comprehensive review of procedures and a quality improvement program in our facility for hiatal hernia repair is shown to reduce recurrence.

Risk factors associated with radiological and clinical recurrences after laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernia with TiO2Mesh™ reinforcement.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic repair of large para-esophageal hiatal hernias (LPHH) remains controversial. Several meta-analyses suggest hiatus reinforcement with mesh has better outcomes over cruroplasty in terms of less recurrence. The aim of this study was to evaluate the medium-term results of treating LPHH with a biosynthetic monofilament polypropylene mesh coated with titanium dioxide to enhance biocompatibility (TiO2Mesh™). METHODS: A retrospective observational study, using data extracted from a prospectively collected database was performed at XXX from December 2014 to June 2023. Included participants were all patients who underwent laparoscopic repair of large (> 5 cm) type III hiatal hernia in which a TiO2Mesh™ was used. The results of the study, including clinical and radiological recurrences as well as mesh-related morbidity, were analyzed. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were finally analyzed. Laparoscopic approach was attempted in all but conversion was needed in one patient because of bleeding in the lesser curvature. With a median follow-up of 41 months (and 10 losses to follow-up), 22% of radiological recurrences and 19.3% of clinical recurrences were described. Regarding complications, one patient presented morbidity associated with the mesh (mesh erosion requiring endoscopic extraction). Recurrent hernia repair was an independent factor of clinical recurrence (OR 4.57 95% CI (1.28-16.31)). CONCLUSION: LPHH with TiO2Mesh™ is safe and feasible with a satisfactory medium-term recurrence and a low complication rate. Prospective randomized studies are needed to establish the standard repair of LPHH.

Surgeon variability in repair of hiatal hernia at the time of bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Hiatal hernia (HH) is estimated to affect between 20 and 50% of patients undergoing bariatric surgery. However, there is no consensus regarding the preoperative assessment and intraoperative repair of HH. The aim of this study was to evaluate the variation in surgeon assessment and repair of HH during bariatric surgery across a multi-hospital healthcare system. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using data obtained from the metabolic and bariatric accreditation quality improvement program (MBSAQIP) and institutional medical records. All adult patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) were included. Preoperative assessment of HH was defined as either EGD or upper GI/Esophagram (UGI) within one year of surgery. Surgeons were evaluated individually and by hospital. Chi-square analysis and ANOVA were performed. RESULTS: From January 2018 to February 2023, 3,487 bariatric surgeries were performed across 4 hospitals and 11 surgeons (2481 SG and 1006 RYGB). HH were concurrently repaired during 24% of operations. The rate of HH repair in SG was 25 and 22% in RYGB (p = 0.06). Preoperatively, 41% of patients underwent EGD and 23% had an UGI. HH was diagnosed in 22% of EGDs. Patients who underwent preoperative EGD had higher rates of HH repair than those without a preop EGD (33% vs. 17%; p < 0.001). The rate of preoperative EGD utilization by surgeon varied significantly from 3 to 92% (p < 0.001) as did HH repair rates between surgeons (range 8-57%; p < 0.001). Even among patients with a preoperatively diagnosed HH, the repair rate ranged 20-91% between individual surgeons (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Within a healthcare system there was significant heterogeneity in approach to assessment and repair of HH during bariatric surgery. This appears to be mediated by multiple factors, including utilization of preoperative studies, individual surgeon differences, and differences between hospitals.

Patients report significant improvement in quality of life following hiatal hernia repair-despite recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Hiatal hernia (HH) repairs have been associated with high recurrence rates. This study aimed to investigate if changes in patient's self-reported GERD health-related quality of life (HRQL) scores over time are associated with long-term surgical outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective chart reviews were conducted on all patients who had laparoscopic or robotic HH repairs between 2018 and 2022 at a tertiary care center. Information was collected regarding initial BMI, endoscopic HH measurement, surgery, and pre- and post-operative HRQL scores. Repeat imaging at least a year following surgical repair was then evaluated for any evidence of recurrence. Paired t tests were used to compare pre- and post-operative HRQL scores. Wilcoxon ranked-sum tests were used to compare the HRQL scores between the recurrence cohort and non-recurrence cohorts at different time points. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients underwent HH repairs and had pre- and post-operative HRQL scores. Mesh was used in 23 repairs (18.25%). 42 patients had recorded HH recurrences (33.3%), 35 had no evidence of recurrence (27.7%), and 49 patients (38.9%) had no follow-up imaging. The average pre-operative QOL score was 24.99 (SD ± 14.95) and significantly improved to 5.63 (SD ± 8.51) at 2-week post-op (p < 0.0001). That improvement was sustained at 1-year post-op (mean 7.86, SD ± 8.26, p < 0.0001). The average time between the initial operation and recurrence was 2.1 years (SD ± 1.10). Recurrence was significantly less likely with mesh repairs (p = 0.005). There was no significant difference in QOL scores at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, or 1 year postoperatively between the cohorts (p = NS). CONCLUSION: Patients had significant long-term improvement in their HRQL scores after surgical HH repair despite recurrences. The need to re-intervene in patients with HH recurrence should be based on their QOL scores and not necessarily based on established recurrence.