[Characteristics of applicants with first-time determination of need for long-term care-A nationwide analysis of care assessments of applicants insured with the AOK aged 60 years and above]. / Charakteristika von Antragstellenden bei erstmaliger Feststellung einer Pflegebedürftigkeit ­ eine bundesweite Analyse von Pflegebegutachtungen von AOK-Versicherten ab 60 Jahren.

BACKGROUND: The increasing number of care-dependent individuals requires approaches to prevent care dependency or reduce the loss of independence. Long-term care assessments can provide valuable insights into this. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to describe initial applicants with an identified need for long-term care as well as to provide a differentiated analysis of care-related diagnoses by age, gender, care level and federal state. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The nationwide database consists of long-term care assessments conducted by the Medical Service (MD) of individuals insured with the AOK aged 60 years and above who received a care level (PG) for the first time in 2021. Information relevant to long-term care was analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: In this study 339,486 individuals with an average age of 79.6 years (±8.4 years) and a female proportion of 59.0% were analyzed. Approximately one half received care level 2 and 32.4% received care level 1. Care levels 3-5 were assessed less frequently (16.2% vs. 4.8% vs. 1.7%, respectively). Individuals living alone were represented more strongly in lower care levels, while individuals not living alone had a higher proportion in care levels 3-5. The most frequent care-relevant diagnoses were senility (R54), polyarthritis (M15) and dementia (F03) with significant differences observed between federal states (ICD-10 R chapter: 0.8% Berlin and Brandenburg vs. 37.9% Saxony; M chapter: 13.6% Bavaria and Hamburg vs. 39.9% Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania). CONCLUSION: Social determinants, such as age, gender, living alone, and region can play a role in the classification into a care level. Significant differences in care-related diagnoses between federal states warrant further investigation in future research.

[Multimorbidity as a predictor for inpatient admission in clinical emergency and acute medicine : Single-center cluster analysis]. / Multimorbidität als Prädiktor für eine stationäre Aufnahme in der klinischen Notfall- und Akutmedizin : Monozentrische Clusteranalyse.

BACKGROUND: Parallel to demographic trends, an increase of multimorbid patients in emergency and acute medicine is prominent. To define easily applicable criteria for the necessity of inpatient admission, a hierarchical cluster analysis was performed. METHODS: In a retrospective, single-center study data of n = 35,249 emergency cases (01/2016-05/2018) were statistically analyzed. Multimorbidity (MM) was defined by at least five ICD-10-GM diagnoses resulting from treatment. A hierarchical cluster analysis was performed for those diagnoses initially summarized into 112 diagnosis subclusters to determine specific clusters of in- and outpatient cases. RESULTS: Hospital admission was determined in 81.2% of all ED patients (n = 28,633); 54.7% of inpatients (n = 15,652) and 0.97% of outpatient cases (n = 64) met the criteria for multimorbidity and the age difference between them was highly significant (68.7/60.8 years; p < 0.001). Using a hierarchical cluster analysis, 13 clusters with different diagnoses were identified for inpatient multimorbid patients (MP) and 7 clusters with primarily hematological malignancies for outpatient MP. The length of stay in the ED of inpatient MP was more than twice as long (max. 8.3 h) as for outpatient MP (max. 3.2 h.). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of diagnoses typical for MM were characterized as clusters in this study. In contrast to single or combined single diagnoses, the statistically determined characterization of clusters allows for a significantly more accurate prediction of ED patients' disposition as well as for economic process allocation.

Development of an immunogenic cell death-related lncRNAs signature for prognostic risk assessment in gastric cancer.

Background: Immunogenic cell death (ICD) is a functionally specialized form of apoptosis induced by endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and is associated with a variety of cancers, including gastric cancer (GC). In recent years, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been shown to be important mediators in the regulation of ICD. However, the specific role and prognostic value of ICD-related lncRNAs in GC remain unclear. This study aims to develop an ICD-related lncRNAs signature for prognostic risk assessment in GC. Methods: The ICD-related lncRNAs signature (ICDlncSig) of GC was constructed by univariate Cox regression analysis, least absolute shrinkage, and selection operator (LASSO) regression model and multivariate Cox regression analysis, and the signature was correlated with immune infiltration. The potential response of GC patients to immunotherapy was predicted by the tumor immune dysfunction and rejection (TIDE) algorithm. In vitro functional experiments were conducted to assess the impact of lncRNAs on the proliferation, migration, and invasion capabilities of GC cells. Results: We constructed a novel ICDlncSig and found that this signature could be used as a prognostic risk model to predict survival of GC patients by validating it in the training cohort, testing cohort and entire cohort. The robust predictive power of the signature was demonstrated by building a Nomogram based on ICDlncSig scores and clinical characteristics. Furthermore, immune cell subpopulations, expression of immune checkpoint genes, and response to chemotherapy and immunotherapy differed significantly between the high- and low-risk groups. The in vitro functional experiments revealed that AP002954.1 and AP000695.1 can promote the proliferation, migration, and invasion of GC cells. Conclusions: In conclusion, our ICDlncSig model has significant predictive value for the prognosis of GC patients and may provide clinical guidance for individualized immunotherapy.

Exploring Associations of Somatic Symptom Disorder with Personality Dysfunction and Specific Maladaptive Traits.

INTRODUCTION: According to ICD-11, personality disorders (PDs) are defined by the severity of self and interpersonal dysfunction in terms of personality functioning (PF) and an optional assessment of specific maladaptive personality trait expressions. Also, somatoform disorders are replaced by somatic symptom disorder (SSD). This study examines associations using the novel diagnostic criteria of SSD in an unselected primary care sample, PF, and maladaptive traits in patients with and without SSD. METHODS: An anonymized cross-sectional study was conducted. A questionnaire including SSD-12 (Somatic Symptom Disorder B Criteria Scale-12) and PHQ-15 (Patient Health Questionnaire-15), LPFS-BF 2.0 (Level of Personality Functioning Scale - Brief Form) and PID-5BF+M (Modified Personality Inventory for DSM-5 - Brief Form Plus) was used. A bifactor (S-1) model was calculated with PF (reference for general factor) and personality traits (specific factors) to estimate associations between PF, specific maladaptive personality traits, and SSD. Differences in personality scales between SSD and non-SSD patients were calculated with the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: A total of 624 patients in six general practices participated (mean age 47 years; 60.4% female). SSD-12 and PHQ-15, respectively, showed significant associations with PF (γ = 0.51; γ = 0.48; p < 0.001), negative affectivity (γ = 0.50; γ = 0.38, p < 0.001) and psychoticism (γ = 0.29; γ = 0.28; p < 0.010). Besides, SSD-12 was significantly associated with disinhibition (γ = -0.38; p < 0.010) and anankastia (γ = -0.16; p < 0.010). Patients with SSD showed significantly impaired PF and maladaptive traits in all scales (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Impaired PF explains moderate to large amounts of the SSD symptoms and maladaptive personality traits negative affectivity, psychoticism, disinhibition, and anankastia show specific associations beyond PF. An in-depth understanding of these relations might be helpful to improve doctor-patient communication and treatment in SSD.

Diseases associated with subsequent peritonsillar abscess: a case-control-study from ENT practices in Germany.

OBJECTIVE: Peritonsillar abscess (PTA) is the most common deep soft tissue infection necessitating surgical intervention in the head and neck region. Potential causes include infections of the palatine tonsils, palatine glands, or branchiogenic rudiments ("acute tonsillitis hypothesis" vs. "Weber's gland hypothesis"). Understanding the currently still unknown predominant cause is crucial for guiding therapeutic strategies, such as abscess tonsillectomy versus incision and drainage alone. This study aims to investigate the pre-diagnoses associated with subsequent PTA using a nationally representative practice database in Germany. METHODS: Data were collected from 195 ENT practices across Germany utilizing the nationally representative practice database IQVIA™ Disease Analyzer. Included were patients aged 18 years and older with a first diagnosis of PTA (index date) between January 2005 and December 2022 and a minimum observation period of 12 months preceding the index date. These patients were matched (1:5) with controls without PTA, based on age, sex, and index year. Frequencies of prior diagnoses coded according to ICD-10 in the 12 months preceding the index date were computed. The association between prior diagnoses and PTA was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression (MLR) and sensitivity analysis (SA). RESULTS: A total of 5,325 cases were compared with 26,725 controls in the multivariable logistic regression (MLR) analysis, and 16,251 cases were compared with 81,255 controls in the sensitivity analysis (SA). Mean age was 45.3 ± 18.3 years (MLR) and 41.9 ± 16.7 years (SA). The proportion of female patients was 51.8% (MLR) and 46.9% (SA), respectively. MLR showed the strongest associations with PTA for the prior diagnoses of "acute tonsillitis" (odds ratio, OR: 6.71; 95% CI: 5.81-7.74), "chronic tonsillitis" (OR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.58-2.52), and "acute pharyngitis" (OR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.50-2.03). SA similarly indicated the strongest associations with PTA for the prior diagnoses of "acute tonsillitis" (OR: 5.02; 95% CI: 4.60-5.47), "chronic tonsillitis" (OR: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.64-2.12), and "acute pharyngitis" (OR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.14-1.41). CONCLUSION: The most prevalent prior diagnosis associated with PTA was acute tonsillitis, followed by chronic tonsillitis and acute pharyngitis. The association with acute pharyngitis suggests possible non-tonsillogenic causes. Other specific causes of PTA, such as inflammation of the palatine gland or branchiogenic remnants, are not captured by the ICD system or the database utilized in this study.

Discussing the concept of substance-induced psychosis (SIP).

Substance-induced psychosis (SIP) is characterized by both substance use and a psychotic state, and it is assumed that the first causes the latter. In ICD-10 the diagnosis is categorized as and grouped together with substance use disorders, and to a large extent also treated as such in the health care system. Though criticism of the diagnostic construct of SIP dates back several decades, numerous large and high-quality studies have been published during the past 5-10 years that substantiate and amplify this critique. The way we understand SIP and even how we name it is of major importance for treatment and it has judicial consequences. It has been demonstrated that substance use alone is not sufficient to cause psychosis, and that other risk factors besides substance use are at play. These are risk factors that are also known to be associated with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Furthermore, register-based studies from several different countries find that a large proportion, around one in four, of those who are initially diagnosed with an SIP over time are subsequently diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder. This scoping review discusses the construct validity of SIP considering recent evidence. We challenge the immanent causal assumption in SIP, and advocate that the condition shares many features with the schizophrenia spectrum disorders. In conclusion, we argue that SIP just as well could be considered a first-episode psychotic disorder in patients with substance use.

Comparison of Diagnosis Codes to Clinical Notes in Classifying Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy.

Purpose: Electronic health records (EHRs) contain a vast amount of clinical data. Improved automated classification approaches have the potential to accurately and efficiently identify patient cohorts for research. We evaluated if a rule-based natural language processing (NLP) algorithm using clinical notes performed better for classifying proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) severity compared with International Classification of Diseases, ninth edition (ICD-9) or 10th edition (ICD-10) codes. Design: Cross-sectional study. Subjects: Deidentified EHR data from an academic medical center identified 2366 patients aged ≥18 years, with diabetes mellitus, diabetic retinopathy (DR), and available clinical notes. Methods: From these 2366 patients, 306 random patients (100 training set, 206 test set) underwent chart review by ophthalmologists to establish the gold standard. International Classification of Diseases codes were extracted from the EHR. The notes algorithm identified positive mention of PDR and NPDR severity from clinical notes. Proliferative diabetic retinopathy and NPDR severity classification by ICD codes and the notes algorithm were compared with the gold standard. The entire DR cohort (N = 2366) was then classified as having presence (or absence) of PDR using ICD codes and the notes algorithm. Main Outcome Measures: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value, and F1 score for the notes algorithm compared with ICD codes using a gold standard of chart review. Results: For PDR classification of the test set patients, the notes algorithm performed better than ICD codes for all metrics. Specifically, the notes algorithm had significantly higher sensitivity (90.5% [95% confidence interval 85.7, 94.9] vs. 68.4% [60.4, 75.3]), but similar PPV (98.0% [95.4-100] vs. 94.7% [90.3, 98.3]) respectively. The F1 score was 0.941 [0.910, 0.966] for the notes algorithm compared with 0.794 [0.734, 0.842] for ICD codes. For PDR classification, ICD-10 codes performed better than ICD-9 codes (F1 score 0.836 [0.771, 0.878] vs. 0.596 [0.222, 0.692]). For NPDR severity classification, the notes algorithm performed similarly to ICD codes, but performance was limited by small sample size. Conclusions: The notes algorithm outperformed ICD codes for PDR classification. The findings demonstrate the significant potential of applying a rule-based NLP algorithm to clinical notes to increase the efficiency and accuracy of cohort selection for research. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Pareto-principle in rare disease education: assessing the representation of common rare diseases in medical education and coding systems.

BACKGROUND: The Pareto Principle asserts that a large portion of results can be achieved with a small amount of effort. Wakap et al. found that around 80% of individuals with rare diseases (RD) suffer from one of 149 specific rare diseases. A significant challenge in the RD domain is the lack of information, compounded by the fact that most RD are not specifically codifiable in the ICD-10, leading to a deficit in reliable epidemiological data. Additionally, time constraints in medical education hinder the comprehensive teaching of all RD, contributing to the diagnostic odyssey problem through failure of recognizing diseases. We identified the most and second most prevalent RD (prevalences of 1-5/10,000 and 1-9/100,000, respectively) from the Orphanet Epidemiology File, totaling 454 diseases. We investigated the feasibility of specific coding using ICD-10-GM and whether these diseases were explicitly listed in the subject catalog (GK) of the second state examination in human medicine in Germany. A two-sided chi-square test was employed to identify statistically significant differences between prevalence groups. RESULTS: Out of 454 diseases, a total of 34% could be specifically coded in ICD-10-GM, with 49% of diseases in the 1-5/10,000 prevalence range (153 RD) and 26% in the 1-9/100,000 range (301 RD) having specific codes. Approximately 15% of all investigated diseases were part of the GK, with 25% of the most prevalent and 10% of the second most prevalent RD group, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed between prevalence groups concerning the presence of a specific ICD-10-GM code and inclusion in the GK. CONCLUSION: Only 49% of the most prevalent RD can be specifically coded, highlighting the challenge of limited epidemiological data on RD. In Germany, the Alpha-ID was introduced in addition to ICD-10 in the inpatient setting to obtain more valid epidemiological data on RD. Recognizing the Pareto Principle's applicability, the study emphasizes the importance of including the most common rare diseases in medical education. While recognizing the limitations, especially in covering ultra-rare diseases, the study underscores the potential benefits of enhancing medical curricula to improve rare disease awareness and diagnostic accuracy.

An evidence map on traditional medicine across health outcomes.

Background: Traditional medicine (TM) plays a significant role in healthcare either as part of the primary healthcare system or as an adjunct to conventional medicine. This study aimed to map systematic reviews (SRs) of TM modalities across health conditions and identify gaps in the research literature to facilitate priority setting in future TM research. Methods: We searched 17 databases from January 2018 to December 2022. Reviewers in pairs independently performed the database search, screened each record for inclusion, extracted data, and performed quality assessments using the AMSTAR 2 - A Measurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews. To be included in this evidence map, the studies had to be SRs of clinical studies that evaluated the effectiveness of a TM modalities. The included SRs were analyzed according to TM modality, ICD-11 disease classification, and health outcomes, and visualized using graphical plots. Results: We retrieved 241,509 records. After excluding duplicate records, 181,616 titles and abstracts were screened and 20,856 records were selected for full-text assessment, of which 18,137 records were further excluded. The final 2719 included SRs were primarily in adults (2591) with only 128 SRs in the pediatric population. The most commonly evaluated health conditions were diseases of the digestive system, circulatory system, and genitourinary system, with herbal medicine (n = 1867) and acupuncture (n = 471) being the most investigated TM modalities in treating these illnesses. Based on AMSTAR 2 criteria, the methodology quality of the included SRs is considerably low. Conclusion: This evidence map provides a comprehensive overview of the extent and nature of the available research onTM modalities across health conditions. It provides an initial step towards characterizing the global evidence base and outlining gaps in the existing evidence. We regard this study as laying the basis for future research of TM modalities. Registration: The protocol of this map is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023416355).

Identification of a SCN5A Genetic Variant Associated With Type 1 Brugada Syndrome (BrS) in a Family.

The Brugada pattern is associated with a genetic disorder characterized by ST-segment elevation in the right precordial leads on electrocardiogram (EKG) in the absence of structural heart disease. Patients with the Brugada pattern have an increased risk for ventricular tachyarrhythmia and sudden cardiac death. Loss-of-function mutations in the SCN5A gene which encodes the alpha subunit of the cardiac sodium channel have been associated with Brugada syndrome (BrS). We report a case of a patient who was found to have a spontaneous type 1 Brugada pattern on a routine EKG done prior to travel. He underwent electrophysiological testing (EPS) which provoked ventricular tachycardia and underwent implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) placement. His family history revealed a history of sudden cardiac death, abnormal EKG, syncope, dilated cardiomyopathy, and BrS. Genetic testing revealed a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) in the SCN5A gene in the proband and six of his relatives. The SCN5A VUS in this clinical context and segregation with the disease in his family supports its reclassification to pathogenic.

Factors Associated With Non-Uptake of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) Among Eligible Patients at a Tertiary Hospital in Kenya.

Background: Efficacy of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) implantation in both primary and secondary prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD) in at-risk population is well established. ICD implantation rates remain low particularly in Africa with a paucity of data regarding factors associated with non-uptake. Objectives: The primary study objective was to determine the factors associated with non-uptake of ICD among heart failure (HF) patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF<35%). Reasons for ICD refusal among eligible patients were reviewed as a secondary objective. Methods: This was a retrospective study among HF patients eligible for ICD implantation evaluated between 2018 to 2020. Comparison between ICD recipient and non-recipient categories was made to establish determinants of non-uptake. Results: Of 206 eligible patients, only 69 (33.5%) had an ICD. Factors independently associated with non-uptake were lack of private insurance (42.3% vs 63.8%; p = 0.005), non-cardiology physician (16.1% vs 5.8%; p = 0.045) and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (54.7% vs 36.4% p = 0.014). The most common (75%) reason for ICD refusal was inability to pay for the device. Conclusion: ICDs are underutilized among eligible HF with reduced EF patients in Kenya. The majority of patients without ICD had no private insurance, had non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and non-cardiology primary physician. Early referral of HF with reduced EF patients to HF specialists to optimize guideline-directed medical therapy and make ICD recommendation is needed.

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator explantation upon patient request: Clinical and ethical considerations.

BACKGROUND: Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) implantation has significantly modified the natural history of patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in various types of heart diseases. However there is a high rate of psychological distress and reduced quality of life in patients with an ICD, more evident in younger individuals. The ICD removal upon patient request is a very rare event and causes many clinical and ethical issues. METHODS: The article discusses the case of a young patient affected by hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, who underwent implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation as a primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Two years after the implantation, the patient repeatedly requested removal of the ICD due to of a significant and untreatable psychological device intolerance. RESULTS: Intervention became possible only after extensive psychological evaluation, which excluded specific pathology, and the ratification of Italian law 219/2017 on informed consent and advance directives, which guarantees the patient's independent decisions on current and future medical treatment. The explantation was performed 7 years after the implant. The patient is alive and in good health. CONCLUSIONS: The paper debates the issues related to establishing a patient-physician relationship based on respect for the patient's autonomy and experience of illness, in reference to principles such as beneficence and non-maleficence, and the conflicts that sometimes arise between them. If a paternalistic approach in the patient-physician relationship evolves into a patient-centered model, it is more certain that the patient's choice is realistically known and shared, and that it is consistent with the patient's values and life goals. The shared decision making (SDM) process and the use of pathology-specific decision aids are able to transform the informed consent tool, usually related to medical-legal issues, into an aid for true partnership between the patient and the medical care team.

Decision-making regarding subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator as primary prevention in patients with low ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Conventional transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (TV-ICD) is the standard device used for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Nonetheless its use is associated with lead-related complications including infection and malfunction. A subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) offers an alternative option without the need for a transvenous lead but has limitations. The decision to implant a TV-ICD or S-ICD in patients with impaired LVEF for primary prevention of SCD is controversial. Several randomised controlled trials and large observational studies have confirmed similar safety and efficacy of S-ICDs and TV-ICDs in such population. METHODS: A literature review was conducted to compare the outcomes of subcutaneous (S-ICD) versus transvenous (TV-ICD) implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane were searched for relevant peer-reviewed articles. Studies were selected based on relevance and quality. Key outcomes like complication rates, efficacy, and patient survival were summarized in a comparative table. RESULTS: Different factors that influence the choice between an TV-ICD and S-ICD for primary prevention of SCD in patients with LVEF are highlighted to guide selection of the appropriate device in different patient populations. Moreover, future perspective on the combination of SICD with leadless pacemaker, and the latest development of the extravascular implantable cardioverter defibrillator are also discussed. CONCLUSIONS: S-ICD offers a safe and efficacious option to primary prevention in reduced ejection fraction. Future development including incorporation of leadless pacemaker will add to the arsenal of choice to protect patients from sudden cardiac death.

Incorrect and Sex-Inconsistent Mapping of Disorders: Identification of Sex Biases in the ICD-10, ICD-11 and SNOMED CT and How to Work Around Them.

In the international classifications ICD-10-WHO and ICD-11-WHO, many sex-specific diseases have incomplete coding. It is possible to further enhance semantic interoperability using SNOMED CT additionally to ICD. Part of the analysis of semantic interoperability of diagnoses in the ICD are Sexual Dysfunctions, Postpartum Depression, Sexual Assault, Premenstrual Tension Syndrome and Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder, Female Genital Mutilation and Cutting, Gender Incongruence and Disorders of Breast. Labeling biases have been identified in all diagnoses, either in SNOMED CT or ICD. For mental disorders associated with pregnancy, gender incongruence and sexual violence the use of the GPS of SNOMED CT can help enhance semantic interoperability additionally to ICD.

Reformatted Crosswalk-Tables Between Annual ICD-10-Versions for Cross Version Data Analysis.

The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision (ICD-10) is internationally used for coding diagnoses, with the ICD-10 German Modification (GM) being prescribed for morbidity coding in Germany. ICD-10-GM is subject to annual revisions. This can lead to backward compatibility issues leading to undesirable consequences for cross-version data analysis. A study of annual crosswalk-tables concerning 21 ICD-10-GM versions showed that the ratio of difficult transitions from an older to a newer version (0.89 %) and vice versa (0.48 %) is not particularly significant but should nevertheless not be neglected. In this paper we present two solutions (Neo4J database and FHIR ConceptMaps) for the automated handling of different ICD-10-GM versions.

Linking Health Terminologies: A Unified Approach to the WHO Family of International Classifications.

This paper presents an effort by the World Health Organization (WHO) to integrate the reference classifications of the Family of International Classifications (ICD, ICF, and ICHI) into a unified digital framework. The integration was accomplished via an expanded Content Model and a single Foundation that hosts all entities from these classifications, allowing the traditional use cases of individual classifications to be retained while enhancing their combined use. The harmonized WHO-FIC Content Model and the unified Foundation has streamlined the content management, enhanced the web-based tool functionalities, and provided opportunities for linkage with external terminologies and ontologies. This integration promises reduced maintenance cost, seamless joint application, complete representation of health-related concepts while enabling better interoperability with other informatics infrastructures.

Challenges of Integrating ICD 11 into Automatic Alerting Systems.

Automatic alerting systems (AASs) can identify adverse health events but emergency communication relies on human operators and natural languages. For complete automation, we need to code the diversity of adverse events in a granularity that supports optimal dispatches. Hence, AAs shall integrate with the International Classification of Diseases (ICD). The ICD-11 coding system includes chapters for external causes of injury. However, ICD-11 supports coding injury incidents in electronic health records (EHRs) after they have occurred, while disregarding integrating real-time injury reporting within its framework. We explore the potential challenges associated with integrating ICD-11 into AAS by analyzing external causes of morbidity or mortality and the dimensions of external causes as potential areas of integration. We recognize the themes: (i) incident of injury, (ii) mode of transport, (iii) indoor location, (iv) outdoor location, and (v) type of building, and identify four challenges: (i) conceptual differences between the two systems, (ii) injury identification, (iii) presence of entities below the shoreline in ICD-11, and (iv) lack of specificity in certain ICD-11 codes related to AASs. For easy integration of ICD-11 into AASs, we recommend an AAS data dictionary and propose ICD-11 updates related to external causes of injury.

Incidence and risk factors for first and recurrent ICD shock therapy in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

BACKGROUND: Advances in medical treatment and outcomes in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients incentivize a need for improved candidate selection and identification of risk factors for ICD therapy. We examined contemporary rates of and risk factors for ICD therapy. METHODS: Patients with ICD for primary (PP) or secondary prevention (SP), implanted between January 2010 and December 2020, were followed for appropriate and inappropriate incident and recurrent shock. RESULTS: Overall, 2998 patients (mean age 61.8 ± 12.7 years, 20% female, 73% ICD carriers, and 47.1% SP) were analyzed with a median follow-up of 4.3 (interquartile range (IQR) 2.1-7.4) years. A total of 426/2998 (14.2%) patients had shock; 364/2998 (12.1%) had appropriate and 82/2998 (2.7%) inappropriate shock, with annualized event rates of 2.34 (2.11-2.59) and 0.49 (0.39-0.61) per 100 person-years, respectively. Of those with shock, 133/364 (36.5%) experienced recurrent appropriate shock and 8/364 (2.2%) received recurrent inappropriate shock, with event rates of 10.57 (8.85-12.53) and 0.46 (0.20-0.92), respectively. In multivariable analyses, female sex was associated with a reduced risk of incident appropriate shock (hazard ratio 0.69 [95% confidence interval 0.52; 0.91]). Of other variables, only revascularization status was associated with recurrent appropriate shock in PP, and CRT-D with recurrent appropriate shock in the overall cohort. CONCLUSION: One in eight ICD recipients received appropriate shock 2-7 years after guideline-directed implantation. More than one-third of patients with a first shock experienced recurrent shock. Few clinical variables showed potential in predicting shocks, illustrating a need for more advanced tools to select candidates for implantation.