Advanced Interatrial Block across the Spectrum of Renal Function.

Background and Objective: Interatrial block (IAB) is defined as a conduction delay between the right and left atria. No data are available about the prevalence of both partial IAB and advanced IAB among the different stages of chronic kidney disease. The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence and type of advanced IAB across the spectrum of renal function, including patients on dialysis and the clinical characteristics associated with advanced IAB. Materials and Methods: Retrospective, single-center study of 151 patients consecutively admitted to the Nephrology and Ophthalmology Unit for 3 months. The study population was divided into three groups according to stages of chronic kidney disease. We evaluated the prevalence and pattern of IAB among the groups and the clinical characteristics associated with advanced IAB. Results: The prevalence of partial IAB was significantly lower in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) group compared to control group (36.7% vs. 59.6%; p = 0.02); in contrast the prevalence of advanced IAB was significantly higher in both chronic kidney disease (CKD) (17.8% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.04) and ESKD group (24.5% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.005) compared to control group. The atypical pattern of advanced IAB was more frequent in both the ESKD and CKD group than in the control group (100% and 75% vs. 33.3%; p = 0.02). Overall, among patients that showed advanced IAB, 17 (73.9%) showed an atypical pattern by morphology and 2 (8.7%) showed an atypical pattern by duration of advanced IAB. The ESKD group was younger than the control group (65.7 ± 12.3 years vs. 71.3 ± 9.9 years; p = 0.01) and showed a higher prevalence of beta blockers (42.9% vs. 19.3%; p = 0.009), as in the CKD group (37.8% vs. 19.3%; p= 0.04). Conclusions: The progressive worsening of renal function was associated with an increasing prevalence of advanced IAB. Advanced IAB may be a sign of uremic cardiomyopathy and may suggest further evaluation with long-term follow-up to investigate its prognostic significance in chronic kidney disease.

Effect of pacing site on P wave parameters: Within-patient comparison of right atrial appendage and Bachmann's bundle.

BACKGROUND: Conventional right atrial appendage pacing (RAAp) is associated with adverse clinical outcomes mediated in part by electromechanical atrial delays. Bachmann's bundle pacing (BBp) offers more physiologic atrial activation; however, detailed analysis of pacing site on paced P wave parameters is lacking. METHODS: Intraprocedural electrocardiograms of 21 consecutive patients undergoing atrial lead implantation were retrospectively analyzed and within-patient comparisons of 7 P wave parameters (P wave duration, P wave voltage, P wave area, PR interval, PR segment, PTFV1 and P wave axis) during sinus rhythm, RAAp and BBp performed. RESULTS: The median basal P wave duration was prolonged at 134.5 ms (Q1,Q3: 120.5, 150.5) and similarly prolonged during RAAp at 144.0 ms (127.0, 176.0) but was significantly reduced with BBp at 98.0 ms (93.0, 116.0; p = 0.005 and p < 0.001, respectively). The median basal P wave voltage in lead II was normal at 0.11 mV (0.08, 0.15) but significantly reduced during RAAp at 0.08 mV (0.04, 0.11) and greatest during BBp at 0.16 mV (0.09, 0.19; p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). The median basal PR interval was top normal at 185.0 ms (163.0, 213.0) and similarly prolonged during RAAp at 204.0 ms (166.5, 221.0) but was significantly shortened during BBp at 163.0 ms (142.0, 208.0; p = 0.03 and p = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: BBp has favorable effects on the paced P wave parameters including marked shortening in P wave duration, increase in P wave voltage in lead II and increase in PR segment which may offer significant hemodynamic advantages over conventional RAAp.

Atrial electrofunctional predictors of incident atrial fibrillation in cardiac amyloidosis.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA) and is a significant risk factor for heart failure hospitalization and thromboembolic events. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to investigate the atrial electrofunctional predictors of incident AF in CA. METHODS: A multicenter, observational study was conducted in 4 CA referral centers including sinus rhythm patients with light-chain (AL) and transthyretin (ATTR) CA undergoing electrocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. The primary end point was new-onset AF occurrence. RESULTS: Overall, 96 patients (AL-CA, n = 40; ATTR-CA, n = 56) were enrolled. During an 18-month median follow-up (Q1-Q3, 7-29 months), 30 patients (29%) had incident AF. Compared with those without AF, patients with AF were older (79 vs 73 years; P = .001). They more frequently had ATTR (87% vs 45%; P < .001); electrocardiographic interatrial block (IAB), either partial (47% vs 21%; P = .011) or advanced (17% vs 3%; P = .017); and lower left atrial ejection fraction (LAEF; 29% vs 41%; P = .004). Age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.059; 95% CI, 1.002-1.118; P = .042), any type of IAB (HR, 2.211; 95% CI, 1.03-4.75; P = .041), and LAEF (HR, 0.967; 95% CI, 0.936-0.998; P = .044) emerged as independent predictors of incident AF. Patients exhibiting any type of IAB, LAEF <40%, and age >78 years showed a cumulative incidence for AF of 40% at 12 months. This risk was significantly higher than that carried by 1 (8.5%) or none (7.6%) of these 3 risk factors. CONCLUSION: In patients with CA, older age, IAB on 12-lead electrocardiography, and reduced LAEF on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging are significant and independent predictors of incident AF. A closer screening for AF is advisable in CA patients carrying these features.

Presystolic wave as a predictor of interatrial block in patients with supraventricular tachycardia.

The identification of interatrial block (IAB) through electrocardiography (ECG) has been correlated with an elevated likelihood of developing atrial fibrillation (AF) and stroke. IAB is diagnosed by evaluating P-wave prolongation on a surface ECG. The presystolic wave (PSW) is an echocardiographic marker determined by pulse-wave examination of the aortic root during late diastole. As IAB and PSW share similar pathophysiological mechanisms, we speculated that PSW, as a component of the P wave, might be useful in predicting IAB. In the present study, we aimed to determine the relationship between PSW and IAB. Patients with pre-diagnosis of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) on electrocardiography or rhythm Holter monitoring between January 2021 and December 2022 were included in the study. Surface 12-lead ECG and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) were performed for the diagnosis of IAB and PSW. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of IAB, and PSW was compared between the groups. In total, 104 patients were enrolled in this study. IAB was diagnosed in 16 patients (15.3%) and PSW was detected in 33 patients (31.7%). The PSW was higher in the IAB ( +) group than in the IAB ( -) group (10 patients (71.4%) vs. 23 patients (32.4%), p = 0.008). PSW may be a useful tool for predicting IAB in patients with SVT. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical utility of PSW in the diagnosis and management of IAB.

Paradoxical interatrial conduction recovery after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation: A case report.

We present a case of a patient with advanced interatrial block who was admitted for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation as treatment of typical atrial flutter. A baseline advanced interatrial block pattern turned into partial interatrial block pattern and prolonged PR interval after the procedure. We discuss the mechanism underlying that change.

Advanced Interatrial Block is Associated With New-onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction / 中国循环杂志

Objectives:Interatrial block(IAB)is a conduction delay between the right and left atria,which is a phenomenon recognized as an electrocardiogram(ECG)feature of atrial fibrosis.This study aimed to investigate the relationship between advanced IAB and in-hospital new-onset atrial fibrillation(NOAF)in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI). Methods:This single-center retrospective observational study consecutively enrolled 916 patients diagnosed with STEMI from September 2019 to June 2022,who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention within 24 hours of onset.ECG was recorded in all patients at the first medical contact,and the ECG was scanned and uploaded on the official China Chest Pain Center platform.The detection rate of IAB and the incidence of NOAF in STEMI patients were analyzed,and the possible associated factors of new-onset atrial fibrillation during hospitalization of STEMI patients were evaluated by logistic regression analysis. Results:IAB was detected in 269(29.4%)patients,57(21.2%)of these patients had advanced IAB.In-hospital NOAF was detected in 89(9.7%)patients.Multivariate analysis showed age(OR=1.070,95%CI:1.045-1.095,P<0.001),left ventricular ejection fraction(OR=0.929,95%CI:0.901-0.957,P<0.001),right coronary artery lesion(OR=1.672,95%CI:1.042-2.683,P=0.033),and advanced IAB(OR=4.007,95%CI:1.973-8.138,P<0.001)were independent determinants of in-hospital NOAF among STEMI patients.Integrated discrimination improvement(IDI)and net reclassification improvement(NRI)were improved significantly when advanced IAB was included in the NOAF risk model with a satisfactory C index(0.742). Conclusions:Advanced IAB is an independent risk marker for NOAF in patients with STEMI.Advanced IAB has incremental impact for improving the discriminatory accuracy of the NOAF predicting model.

P-wave characteristics as electrocardiographic markers of atrial abnormality in prediction of incident atrial fibrillation - The Malmö Preventive Project.

BACKGROUND: P-wave indices reflect atrial abnormalities contributing to atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to assess a comprehensive set of P-wave characteristics for prediction of incident AF in a population-based setting. METHODS: Malmö Preventative Project (MPP) participants were reexamined in 2002-2006 with electrocardiographic (ECG) and echocardiographic examinations and followed for 5 years. AF-free subjects (n = 983, age 70 ± 5 years, 38% females) with sinus rhythm ECGs were included in the study. ECGs were digitally processed using the Glasgow algorithm. P-wave duration, axis, dispersion, P-terminal force in lead V1 and interatrial block (IAB) were evaluated. ECG risk score combining the morphology, voltage and length of P-wave (MVP score) was calculated. New-onset diagnoses of AF were obtained from nation-wide registers. RESULTS: During follow up, 66 patients (7%) developed AF. After adjustment for age and gender, the independent predictors of AF were abnormal P-wave axis > 75° (HR 1.63 CI95% 1.95-11.03) and MVP score 4 (HR 6.17 CI 95% 1.76-21.64), both correlated with LA area: Person r - 0.146, p < 0.001 and 0.192, p < 0.001 respectively. Advanced IAB (aIAB) with biphasic P-wave morphology in leads III and aVF was the most prevalent variant of aIAB and predicted AF in a univariate model (HR 2.59 CI 95% 1.02-6.58). CONCLUSION: P-wave frontal axis and MVP score are ECG-based AF predictors in the population-based cohort. Our study provides estimates for prevalence and prognostic importance of different variants of aIAB, providing a support to use biphasic P-wave morphology in lead aVF as the basis for aIAB definition.

Left atrial strain associated with interatrial block in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Both interatrial block (IAB) and left atrium (LA) strain are associated with atrial arrhythmias in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, but the relationship between IAB and LA strain has not yet been reported. This study was to investigate the correlation between LA strain and IAB in STEMI patients. This is a single-center retrospective clinical observational study. The STEMI patients with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) were enrolled, and all patients completed cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). A standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was recorded on the same day as CMR. IAB was measured by p duration on ECG at follow-up. 302 patients were enrolled, including 91 (30.1%) with IAB. The reservoir strain, conduit strain and booster strain were included in model 1, model 2 and model 3, respectively. In model 1, age (OR 1.025; 95%CI 1.003-1.047; p = 0.026), hypertension (OR 2.188; 95%CI 1.288-3.719; p = 0.004), and reservoir strain (OR 0.947; 95%CI 0.920-0.974; p < 0.001) were independent factors for IAB. In model 2, age (OR 1.031; 95%CI 1.009-1.053; p = 0.006), hypertension (OR 2.058; 95%CI 1.202-3.522; p = 0.008), RCA lesions (OR 1.797; 95%CI 1.036-3.113; p = 0.037), and conduit strain (OR 0.910; 95%CI 0.868-0.953; p < 0.001) were independent factors for IAB. In model 3, age (OR 1.022; 95%CI 1.001-1.045; p = 0.044), hypertension (OR 2.239; 95%CI 1.329-3.773; p = 0.002), and booster strain (OR 0.948; 95%CI 0.908-0.991; p = 0.019) were independent factors for IAB. With the lowest AIC and BIC values, model 2 was the best-fit model. LA strain associated with IAB in STEMI patients. The model including conduit strain was the best-fit one.

Echocardiography and Electrocardiography in Detecting Atrial Cardiomyopathy: A Promising Path to Predicting Cardioembolic Strokes and Atrial Fibrillation.

(1) Background: Atrial cardiomyopathy constitutes an intrinsically prothrombotic atrial substrate that may promote atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic events, especially stroke, independently of the arrhythmia. Atrial reservoir strain is the echocardiography marker with the most robust evidence supporting its prognostic utility. The main aim of this study is to identify atrial cardiomyopathy by investigating the association between left atrial dysfunction in echocardiography and P-wave abnormalities in the surface electrocardiogram. (2) Methods: This is a community-based, multicenter, prospective cohort study. A randomized sample of 100 patients at a high risk of developing atrial fibrillation were evaluated using diverse echocardiography imaging techniques, and a standard electrocardiogram. (3) Results: Significant left atrial dysfunction, expressed by a left atrial reservoir strain < 26%, showed a relationship with the dilation of the left atrium (p < 0.001), the left atrial ejection fraction < 50% (p < 0.001), the presence of advanced interatrial block (p = 0.032), P-wave voltage in lead I < 0.1 mV (p = 0.008), and MVP ECG score (p = 0.036). (4) Conclusions: A significant relationship was observed between left atrial dysfunction and the presence of left atrial enlargement and other electrocardiography markers; all of them are non-invasive biomarkers of atrial cardiomyopathy.

Interatrial Block, Bayés Syndrome, Left Atrial Enlargement, and Atrial Failure.

Interatrial block (IAB) is defined by the presence of a P-wave ≥120 ms. Advanced IAB is diagnosed when there is also a biphasic morphology in inferior leads. The cause of IAB is complete block of Bachmann's bundle, resulting in retrograde depolarization of the left atrium from areas near the atrioventricular junction. The anatomic substrate of advanced IAB is fibrotic atrial cardiomyopathy. Dyssynchrony induced by advanced IAB is frequently a trigger and maintenance mechanism of atrial fibrillation (AF) and other atrial arrhythmias. Bayés syndrome is characterized by the association of advanced IAB with atrial arrhythmias. This syndrome is associated with an increased risk of stroke, dementia, and mortality. Advanced IAB frequently produces an alteration of the atrial architecture. This atrial remodeling may promote blood stasis and hypercoagulability, triggering the thrombogenic cascade, even in patients without AF. In addition, atrial remodeling may ultimately lead to mechanical dyssynchrony and enlargement. Atrial enlargement is usually the result of prolonged elevation of atrial pressure due to various underlying conditions such as IAB, diastolic dysfunction, left ventricular hypertrophy, valvular heart disease, hypertension, and athlete's heart. Left atrial enlargement (LAE) may be considered present if left atrial volume indexed to body surface is > 34 mL/m2; however, different cut-offs have been used. Finally, atrial failure is a global clinical entity that includes any atrial dysfunction that results in impaired cardiac performance, symptoms, and decreased quality of life or life expectancy.

Interatrial Block and Electrocardiographic Markers of Repolarization in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19: Classical and Bayesian Analysis.

Objective: Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) and ventricular arrhythmias. Several electrophysiological abnormalities on surface electrocardiography (ECG) are associated with AF and ventricular arrhythmias, either as markers of abnormal interatrial conduction or abnormal repolarization. The present study sought to understand whether such ECG markers are more common in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection during the pandemic. Methods: A total of 87 COVID-19 patients formed the study group, whereas 64 patients who were hospitalized for any reason other than COVID-19 infection served as controls. The frequency of partial and advanced interatrial block (IAB), QT and corrected QT (QTc) durations, QT dispersion (QTd), and T peak-to-end duration (Tpe) were measured from ECGs at admission. Results: Both partial and advanced IAB were more common in patients with COVID-19, although statistical significance was only observed for advanced IAB (11.5% in COVID-19 patients vs. 0.0% in controls, p=0.005). There were no differences between the groups for QTc, QTd or Tpe. On Bayesian analyses, there was strong evidence favoring an association between COVID-19 and advanced IAB (BF10:16), whereas there was no evidence for an association for partial IAB, QTc, QTd, or Tpe (BF10<1 for all). Conclusions: Patients hospitalized with COVID-19 were more likely to have advanced IAB, which may explain why AF is more frequent in these patients.

Interatrial block as a first clinical presentation of atrial cardiomyopathy related to a novel LMNA variant: a case report.

Background: Interatrial block (IAB) is a conduction delay in Bachmann's bundle with a well-described association with structural heart disease, supraventricular arrhythmias, and cardiovascular events. Case summary: We report the case of an asymptomatic 35-year-old man in whom the presence of IAB at electrocardiogram led to a comprehensive evaluation including speckle-tracking echocardiography, 24 h Holter monitoring, and genetic testing. Speckle-tracking echocardiography demonstrated a decrease in the longitudinal strain of interventricular septum, a typical feature of LMNA-related cardiomyopathy, and decreased indices of left atrial deformation. A diagnosis of cardiac laminopathy related to the frame shift variant c.1367 (p.Asn456Thrfs*24) of the LMNA gene was made. A dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation was performed for the high risk of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Discussion: This case demonstrates that IAB could be a rare presentation of a life-threatening laminopathy. Strain echocardiography is an essential tool to evaluate the deposition of fibrosis tissue in subclinical cardiomyopathies. Our report describes a novel variant of LMNA gene associated with a high risk of sudden cardiac death.

New pattern of atypical advanced interatrial block.

INTRODUCTION: Interatrial block (IAB) is defined as prolonged P-wave duration (≥ 120 ms) due to delayed conduction in the Bachmann bundle. This is readily identifiable using surface electrocardiogram (ECG). Advanced IAB can be classified as typical and atypical. Atypical IAB can be further categorized by (i) duration or (ii) morphology. In this report, we have identified a new pattern of atypical IAB with triphasic morphology of the P-wave in the inferior leads. METHODS: Two clinical cases were evaluated including surface ECGs. P-wave durations and amplitudes were measured with digital calipers using ECG analysis software (MUSE, GE HealthCare). Comparisons were made using prior data to evaluate IAB and P-wave duration and morphology. RESULTS: A new pattern of atypical advanced IAB shows prolonged P-wave duration (P wave >160 ms) and triphasic morphology in all inferior leads with P +/+/- and P +/-/+, respectively. We speculate that triphasic P-waves in the inferior leads represent three moments of atrial depolarization; from right to left. CONCLUSION: This study describes a novel pattern of atypical advanced IAB. Further investigation regarding the increased risk of atrial fibrillation and stroke associated with this new pattern is warranted in the future.

Interatrial Block Association With Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients Without a History of Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Interatrial block (IAB) is associated with thromboembolism and atrial arrhythmias. However, prior studies included small patient cohorts so it remains unclear whether IAB predicts adverse outcomes particularly in context of atrial fibrillation (AF)/atrial flutter (AFL). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether IAB portends increased stroke risk in a large cohort in the presence or absence of AFAF/AFL. METHODS: We performed a 5-center retrospective analysis of 4,837,989 electrocardiograms (ECGs) from 1,228,291 patients. IAB was defined as P-wave duration ≥120 ms in leads II, III, or aVF. Measurements were extracted as .XML files. After excluding patients with prior AF/AFL, 1,825,958 ECGs from 458,994 patients remained. Outcomes were analyzed using restricted mean survival time analysis and restricted mean time lost. RESULTS: There were 86,317 patients with IAB and 355,032 patients without IAB. IAB prevalence in the cohort was 19.6% and was most common in Black (26.1%), White (20.9%), and Hispanic (18.5%) patients and least prevalent in Native Americans (9.2%). IAB was independently associated with increased stroke probability (restricted mean time lost ratio coefficient [RMTLRC]: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.35-1.51; tau = 1,895), mortality (RMTLRC: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.07-1.21; tau = 1,924), heart failure (RMTLRC: 1.94; 95% CI: 1.83-2.04; tau = 1,921), systemic thromboembolism (RMTLRC: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.53-1.71; tau = 1,897), and incident AF/AFL (RMTLRC: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.10-1.22; tau = 1,888). IAB was not associated with stroke in patients with pre-existing AF/AFL. CONCLUSIONS: IAB is independently associated with stroke in patients with no history of AF/AFL even after adjustment for incident AF/AFL and CHA2DS2-VASc score. Patients are at increased risk of stroke even when AF/AFL is not identified.

Asymmetric remodeling between the left and right atria in patients with advanced interatrial block and atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Advanced interatrial block (A-IAB) on electrocardiography (ECG) represents the conduction delay between the left and right atria. We investigated the association of A-IAB with left and right atrial (LA/RA) remodeling in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: We enrolled 74 patients who underwent ECG, cardiac computed tomography (CCT), and echocardiography during sinus rhythm before catheter ablation of AF. A-IAB was defined as P-wave duration ≥120 ms with a biphasic morphology in leads III and aVF or notched morphology in lead II. We compared the maximum and minimum LA/RA volume indices (max and min LAV/RAVI), LA/RA expansion index (LAEI/RAEI), and total, passive, and active LA/RA emptying fraction (LAEF/RAEF) between patients with and without A-IAB. RESULTS: Of the 74 patients (mean age, 64.3 ± 9.6 years), 35 (47%) showed A-IAB. Patients with A-IAB had a significantly higher likelihood of hypertension and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction than those without. Patients with A-IAB had significantly larger max (69.2 [60.7-79.7]mL/m2 vs. 60.9 [50.4-68.3]mL/m2, P < 0.01) and min (44.0 [37.2-52.1]mL/m2 vs. 34.1 [29.2-43.5]mL/m2, P < 0.01) LAVI than those without. The max and min RAVI were not significantly different between groups. LAEI (55.1 [48.2-78.5]% vs. 72.1 [57.8-84.8]%, P < 0.05), total LAEF (35.5 [32.5-44.0]% vs. 41.9 [36.6-45.9]%, P < 0.05), and passive LAEF (12.2 [10.0-14.4]% vs. 15.5 [11.2-19.6]%, P < 0.05) were significantly lower in patients with A-IAB than without. CONCLUSIONS: A-IAB was associated with LA, but not RA enlargement, in patients with AF. A-IAB may indicate LA functional remodeling in the reservoir and conduit phases.

P-wave duration and interatrial block as predictors of new-onset atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Early detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) could improve patient outcomes. P-wave duration (PWD) and interatrial block (IAB) are known predictors of new-onset AF and could improve selection for AF screening. This meta-analysis reviews the published evidence and offers practical implications. METHODS: Publication databases were systematically searched, and studies reporting PWD and/or morphology at baseline and new-onset AF during follow-up were included. IAB was defined as partial (pIAB) if PWD≥120 ms or advanced (aIAB) if the P-wave was biphasic in the inferior leads. After quality assessment and data extraction, random-effects analysis calculated odds ratio (OR) and confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup analysis was performed for those with implantable devices (continuous monitoring). RESULTS: Among 16,830 patients (13 studies, mean 66 years old), 2,521 (15%) had new-onset AF over a median of 44 months. New-onset AF was associated with a longer PWD (mean pooled difference: 11.5 ms, 13 studies, p < 0.001). The OR for new-onset AF was 2.05 (95% CI: 1.3-3.2) for pIAB (5 studies, p = 0.002) and 3.9 (95% CI: 2.6-5.8) for aIAB (7 studies, p < 0.001). Patients with pIAB and devices had higher AF-detection risk (OR: 2.33, p < 0.001) than those without devices (OR: 1.36, p = 0.56). Patients with aIAB had similarly high risk regardless of device presence. There was significant heterogeneity but no publication bias. CONCLUSION: Interatrial block is an independent predictor of new-onset AF. The association is stronger for patients with implantable devices (close monitoring). Thus, PWD and IAB could be used as selection criteria for intensive screening, follow-up or interventions.

Amplified sinus-P-wave analysis predicts outcomes of cryoballoon ablation in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: A multicentre study.

Introduction: Outcomes of catheter ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) remain suboptimal. Non-invasive stratification of patients based on the presence of atrial cardiomyopathy (ACM) could allow to identify the best responders to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Methods: Observational multicentre retrospective study in patients undergoing cryoballoon-PVI for non-paroxysmal AF. The duration of amplified P-wave (APW) was measured from a digitally recorded 12-lead electrocardiogram during the procedure. If patients were in AF, direct-current cardioversion was performed to allow APW measurement in sinus rhythm. An APW cut-off of 150 ms was used to identify patients with significant ACM. We assessed freedom from arrhythmia recurrence at long-term follow-up in patients with APW ≥ 150 ms vs. APW < 150 ms. Results: We included 295 patients (mean age 62.3 ± 10.6), of whom 193 (65.4%) suffered from persistent AF and the remaining 102 (34.6%) from long-standing persistent AF. One-hundred-forty-two patients (50.2%) experienced arrhythmia recurrence during a mean follow-up of 793 ± 604 days. Patients with APW ≥ 150 ms had a significantly higher recurrence rate post ablation compared to those with APW < 150 ms (57.0% vs. 41.6%; log-rank p < 0.001). On a multivariable Cox-regression analysis, APW≥150 ms was the only independent predictor of arrhythmia recurrence post ablation (HR 2.03 CI95% 1.28-3.21; p = 0.002). Conclusion: APW duration predicts arrhythmia recurrence post cryoballoon-PVI in persistent and long-standing persistent AF. An APW cut-off of 150 ms allows to identify patients with significant ACM who have worse outcomes post PVI. Analysis of APW represents an easy, non-invasive and highly reproducible diagnostic tool which allows to identify patients who are the most likely to benefit from PVI-only approach.

Electro-Mechanical Alterations in Atrial Fibrillation: Structural, Electrical, and Functional Correlates.

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice affecting both patients' survival and well-being. Apart from aging, many cardiovascular risk factors may cause structural remodeling of the atrial myocardium leading to atrial fibrillation development. Structural remodelling refers to the development of atrial fibrosis, as well as to alterations in atrial size and cellular ultrastructure. The latter includes myolysis, the development of glycogen accumulation, altered Connexin expression, subcellular changes, and sinus rhythm alterations. The structural remodeling of the atrial myocardium is commonly associated with the presence of interatrial block. On the other hand, prolongation of the interatrial conduction time is encountered when atrial pressure is acutely increased. Electrical correlates of conduction disturbances include alterations in P wave parameters, such as partial or advanced interatrial block, alterations in P wave axis, voltage, area, morphology, or abnormal electrophysiological characteristics, such as alterations in bipolar or unipolar voltage mapping, electrogram fractionation, endo-epicardial asynchrony of the atrial wall, or slower cardiac conduction velocity. Functional correlates of conduction disturbances may incorporate alterations in left atrial diameter, volume, or strain. Echocardiography or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used to assess these parameters. Finally, the echocardiography-derived total atrial conduction time (PA-TDI duration) may reflect both atrial electrical and structural alterations.

New electrocardiographic aspects of the P wave: Its value in clinical cardiology.

In this article, we will comment on new aspects of P-wave morphology that help us to better diagnose atrial blocks and atrial enlargement, and their clinical implications. These include: (1) Atypical ECG patterns of advanced interatrial block; (2) The ECG diagnosis of left atrial enlargement versus interatrial block; (3) Atrial fibrillation and advanced interatrial block: The two sides of the same coin; and (4) P-wave parameters: Clinical implications.

P-wave duration and atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a global health problem with high morbidity and mortality. Catheter ablation (CA) can reduce AF burden and symptoms, but AF recurrence (AFr) remains an issue. Simple AFr predictors like P-wave duration (PWD) could help improve AF therapy. This updated meta-analysis reviews the increasing evidence for the association of AFr with PWD and offers practical implications. METHODS AND RESULTS: Publication databases were systematically searched and cohort studies reporting PWD and/or morphology at baseline and AFr after CA were included. Advanced interatrial block (aIAB) was defined as PWD ≥ 120 ms and biphasic morphology in inferior leads. Random-effects analysis was performed using the Review Manager 5.3 and R programs after study selection, quality assessment, and data extraction, to report odds ratio (OR) and confidence intervals. : Among 4175 patients in 22 studies, 1138 (27%) experienced AFr. Patients with AFr had longer PWD with a mean pooled difference of 7.8 ms (19 studies, P < 0.001). Pooled OR was 2.04 (1.16-3.58) for PWD > 120 ms (13 studies, P = 0.01), 2.42 (1.12-5.21) for PWD > 140 ms (2 studies, P = 0.02), 3.97 (1.79-8.85) for aIAB (5 studies, P < 0.001), and 10.89 (4.53-26.15) for PWD > 150 ms (4 studies, P < 0.001). There was significant heterogeneity but no publication bias detected. CONCLUSION: P-wave duration is an independent predictor for AF recurrence after left atrium ablation. The AFr risk is increasing exponentially with PWD prolongation. This could facilitate risk stratification by identifying high-risk patients (aIAB, PWD > 150 ms) and adjusting follow up or interventions.