Effects of different surgical treatments on pain, disability, anxiety and quality of life in lumbar disc herniation.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the effects of microscopic microdiscectomy and microendoscopic discectomy on pain, disability, fear of falling, kinesiophobia, anxiety, quality of life in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). METHODS: A total of 90 patients who underwent microscopic microdiscectomy (n = 40) and microendoscopic discectomy (n = 50) for LDH were included in this study. The patients' pain, disability, fear of falling, kinesiophobia, anxiety, and quality of life were evaluated before the surgery, in the early postoperative period and three months after. RESULTS: In patients who underwent microendoscopic discectomy, the results of pain, disability, fear of falling, kinesiophobia and anxiety were statistically decreased compared with the microscopic microdiscectomy in the early postoperative period and three months later (p < 0.05). Also, a statistically higher increase was observed in the general health perception of patients who underwent microendoscopic discectomy three months after the operation (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Microendoscopic microdiscectomy, remains the most effective and widely applied method with advantages on pain, quality of life, and improved physical functions.

OBJETIVO: Este estudio tiene como objetivo comparar los efectos de la microdiscectomía microscópica y la discectomía microendoscópica sobre el dolor, la discapacidad, el miedo a caer, la kinesiofobia, la ansiedad y la calidad de vida en pacientes con hernia de disco lumbar (LDH). MÉTODOS: Se incluyeron en este estudio un total de 90 pacientes sometidos a microdiscectomía microscópica (n = 40) y discectomía microendoscópica (n = 50) por LDH. Se evaluó el dolor, la discapacidad, el miedo a caer, la kinesiofobia, la ansiedad y la calidad de vida de los pacientes antes de la cirugía, en el postoperatorio temprano y tres meses después. RESULTADOS: En los pacientes sometidos a discectomía microendoscópica, los resultados de dolor, discapacidad, miedo a caer, kinesiofobia y ansiedad disminuyeron estadísticamente en comparación con la microdiscectomía microscópica en el postoperatorio temprano y tres meses después (p < 0.05). Además, se observó un aumento estadísticamente mayor en la percepción de salud general de los pacientes sometidos a discectomía microendoscópica tres meses después de la operación (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIÓN: La microdiscectomía microendoscópica sigue siendo el método más eficaz y ampliamente aplicado con ventajas sobre el dolor, la calidad de vida y la mejora de las funciones físicas.

Repeated microendoscopic discectomy for recurrent lumbar disk herniation

OBJECTIVES: To explore the microendoscopic discectomy technique and inclusion criteria for the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation and to supply feasible criteria and technical notes to avoid complications and to increase the therapeutic effect. METHODS: A consecutive series of 25 patients who underwent posterior microendoscopic discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation were included. The inclusion criteria were as follows: no severe pain in the lumbar region, no lumbar instability observed by flexion-extension radiography and no intervertebral discitis or endplate damage observed by magnetic resonance imaging. All patients were diagnosed by clinical manifestations and imaging examinations. RESULTS: Follow-up visits were carried out in all cases. Complications, such as nerve injuries, were not observed. The follow-up outcomes were graded using the MacNab criteria. A grade of excellent was given to 12 patients, good to 12 patients and fair to 1 patient. A grade of excellent or good occurred in 96% of cases. One patient relapsed 3 months after surgery and then underwent lumbar interbody fusion and inner fixation. The numerical rating scale of preoperative leg pain was 7.4± 1.5, whereas it decreased to 2.1±0.8 at 7 days after surgery. The preoperative Oswestry disability index of lumbar function was 57.5±10.0, whereas it was 26.0±8.5 at 7 days after surgery. CONCLUSION: In these cases, microendoscopic discectomy was able to achieve satisfactory clinical results. Furthermore, it has advantages over other methods because of its smaller incision, reduced bleeding and more efficient recovery. .