Comparison of difficulty in stair ascent and descent after total knee replacement.

[Purpose] Although many studies have shown that patients have difficulty in climbing or descending stairs after undergoing total knee replacement, no study so far has compared the difficulty of stair ascent and descent based on objective indicators. This study compared stair ascending and descending processes based on three indicators and clarified which was more difficult. [Participants and Methods] We defined 1) movement method, 2) the necessity for handrail use, and 3) speed as objective indicators. Seventy-eight patients who underwent total knee replacement participated in this study. Three months after the surgery, we examined 1) whether the patients could ascend or descend in a step-over-step or step-by-step manner, 2) whether the patients required handrail support, and measured 3) the time required to ascend and descend for four steps. [Results] The step-by-step movement and handrail requirement rates associated with stair descent were higher than the corresponding rates associated with stair ascent. In addition, the time required for stair descent was greater than that required for ascent. [Conclusion] We found that stair descent was more challenging than stair ascent in terms of all three objective indices: movement method, handrail use, and speed. The results indicate that rehabilitation after total knee replacement should focus more on stair descent than on stair ascent.

The influence of women's age and fall history on foot and lower limb kinematics during transition step descent.

Falls are a major public health concern, with older women being at the greatest risk to experience a fall. Step descent increases the likelihood of a fall injury, yet the influence of age and fall history on lower extremity kinematics have not been extensively studied. The purpose of this study was to examine lower extremity and foot kinematics of women with and without a fall history during single step descent. Hip, knee, and foot kinematics of young women (n = 15, age = 22.6 ± 3.2 years), older women with no recent falls (n = 15, age = 71.6 ± 4.4 years), and older women with a fall history (n = 15, age = 71.5 ± 5.0 years) as they descended a 17 cm step were examined. Differences in initial contact angles and ROM during landing were examined with between group MANOVA tests. Distal foot initial contact angles were not significant between groups. For range of motion, both older groups went through greater hip extension (p = 0.003, partial η2 = 0.25), but less hip adduction (p = 0.002, partial η2 = 0.27) and less lateral midfoot dorsiflexion (p = 0.001, partial η2 = 0.28) than the younger women. The older fall group had reduced knee flexion (p = 0.004, partial η2 = 0.23) than the younger group, and the older non-fallers slightly plantarflexed at the medial midfoot (p = 0.005, partial η2 = 0.23) while the young women dorsiflexed. Thelanding phase ROMdifferences exhibited by the older adult groupsmayincrease the likelihood of a misstep, which may result in a fall.

The impact of backpack load on adolescent's stair descent gait.

This study investigates the impact of increasing backpack load on the gait of adolescents during stair descent. Sixteen healthy male students (age = 12.9 ± 0.6 years) were required to descend the stairs in 4 loaded conditions. The kinematic, kinetic, and EMG data were collected synchronously and gait parameters, especially indicators of balance control, were analyzed. The posterior tilt angles (COM-COP IA in the sagittal plane) (0 %-42 %, 48 %-53 %, 58 %-91 %, p < 0.01), trunk anterior tilt angles (9-33 %, 51-65 %, p < 0.01), and CV of stride length (p < 0.01) increased with the backpack load. The COM-Step edge separation decreased with the increased backload (p < 0.01). In addition, the hip flexion torque (25-40 %, 45-51 %, p < 0.01), the rectus femoris activation, and the hip stiffness increased significantly as the load up to 15 % Body Weight (BW)and 20 % BW. The increasing backpack load may affect adolescent's stair descent gait. Especially as the load was up to 15 % BW, the adolescents' bodies tended to tilt backwards relative to the support foot during the single stance phase. They may activate the hip flexors and tilt forward the trunk to recover from the balance perturbation, which was associated with increased hip flexion torques. This adjustment was more pronounced with the increasing backpack load. However, excessive forward flexion may increase the risk of forward falls. The boundaries of adjustment need further research in the future. Findings from this study provide baseline information on the intrinsic mechanisms of balance control during stair descent.

Spatiotemporal lower-limb asymmetries during stair descent in athletes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated motor control recovery at different times following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) by investigating lower-limb spatiotemporal symmetry during stair descent performances. METHODS: We used a cross-sectional design to compare asymptomatic athletes (Controls, n = 18) with a group of people with ACLR (n = 49) divided into three time-from-ACLR subgroups (Early: <6 months, n = 17; Mid: 6-18 months, n = 16; Late: ≥18 months, n = 16). We evaluated: "temporal symmetry" during the stance subphases (single-support, first and second double-support) and "spatial symmetry" for hip-knee-ankle intra-joint angular displacements during the stance phase using a dissimilarity index applied on superimposed 3D phase plots. RESULTS: We found significant between-group differences in temporal variables (p ≤ 0.001). Compared to Controls, both Early and Mid (p ≤ 0.05) showed asymmetry in the first double-support time (longer for their injured vs. non-injured leg), while Early generally also showed longer durations in all other phases, regardless of stepping leg. No statistically significant differences were found for spatial intra-joint symmetry between groups. CONCLUSION: Temporal but not spatial asymmetry in stair descent is often present early after ACLR; it may remain for up to 18 months and may underlie subtle intra- and inter-joint compensations. Spatial asymmetry may need further exploration.

Analysis of Biomechanical Characteristics of Lower Limbs During Stair Descent in Patients with Hemiplegia / 医用生物力学

Objective To conduct a comparative analysis of the biomechanical characteristics of the lower limbs during stair descent in patients with hemiplegia using different method to provide theoretical references for reducing fall risk during stair descent.Methods Ten healthy subjects and 20 patients with hemiplegia were selected,and their kinematic and dynamic data during stair descent were collected using the Qualisys Motion capture system and the Kistler three-dimensional dynamometer.Their biomechanical characteristics and fall risks were also analyzed.Results Compared with that of healthy subjects and patients that step on the healthy side(SHS),the range of motion(ROM)of the affected side in the lower-limb joints of patients that step on the affected side(SAS)was smaller.SHS reduced the flexion and extension ranges of the healthy side of the knee joint,and the ROM of the affected side in the lower-limb joints of SHS patients was greater than that of SAS patients.The ground reaction force(GRF)curve changes of SAS patients in left and right directions during stair descent were relatively consistent with those of normal subjects.The maximum vertical GRF of the affected side in SAS patients at the moment of landing was 1.05 times the body weight,whereas that of the healthy side was 1.25 times the body weight,which was lower than that of normal subjects(1.5 times the body weight).The maximum vertical GRF of the healthy side in SHS patients at the moment of landing was 1.85 times the body weight,which was higher than that of SAS patients and normal subjects.Conclusions Compared with that of SAS patients,the affected limb side of SHS patients has a greater ROM and vertical GRF at the moment of landing during stair descent,making SHS difficult to master.SAS is most consistent with the biomechanical characteristics during stair descent of patients with hemiplegia.

Biomechanical effects of an articulating prosthetic toe joint during stair navigation for individuals with unilateral, below-knee limb loss.

Stair navigation is an essential and demanding form of locomotion. During stair ascent and descent, persons with lower limb loss exhibit gait characteristics which may increase their risk of falls and joint degeneration of the intact limb. To reduce deviations from typically-able-bodied gait and overloading of the intact limb for this population, one potential intervention involves modifying passive prosthetic feet by incorporating a flexible toe joint that simulates the biological metatarsophalangeal joint. In this study, we aimed to assess the user preferences and biomechanical effects of a flexible prosthetic toe joint during stair ascent and descent for persons with unilateral lower-limb loss. Nine participants with unilateral lower-limb loss were recruited (Male; Medicare Functional Classification Level: eight K4, one K3; age: 41 ± 11 years; mass: 95 ± 13 kg; height: 1.84 ± 0.05 m; mean ± SD). No significant changes in lower-limb joint mechanics were identified. Five of nine participants preferred the unmodified prosthesis with a standard carbon fiber keel for both stair ascent and descent. Varied user preferences and inconsistent changes in lower-limb joint parameters between participants highlight the importance of subject-specific analyses and individualized device prescription.

Contact area and pressure changes of patellofemoral joint during stair ascent and stair descent.

PURPOSE: To investigate the differences of patellofemoral joint pressure and contact area between the process of stair ascent and stair descent. METHODS: The finite element models of 9 volunteers without disorders of knee (9 males) to estimate patellar cartilage pressure during the stair ascent and the stair descent. Simulations took into account cartilage morphology from magnetic resonance imaging, joint posture from weight-bearing magnetic resonance imaging, and ligament model. The three-dimension models of the patella, femur and tibia were developed with the medical image processing software, Mimics 11.1. The ligament was established by truss element of the non-linear FE solver. The equivalent gravity direction (-z direction) load was applied to the whole end of femur (femoral head) according to the body weight of the volunteers, and the force of patella was observed. A paired-samples t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test to make comparisons between stair ascent and stair descent. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 22.0 using a P value of 0.05 to indicate significance. RESULTS: During the stair descent (knee flexion at 30°), the contact pressure of the patella was 2.59 ± 0.06Mpa. The contact pressure of femoral trochlea cartilage was 2.57 ± 0.06Mpa. During the stair ascent (knee flexion at 60°), the contact pressure with patellar cartilage was 2.82 ± 0.08Mpa. The contact pressure of the femoral trochlea cartilage was 3.03 ± 0.11Mpa. The contact area between patellar cartilage and femoral trochlea cartilage was 249.27 ± 1.35mm2 during the stair descent, which was less than 434.32 ± 1.70mm2 during the stair ascent. The area of high pressure was located in the lateral area of patella during stair descent and the area of high pressure was scattered during stair ascent. CONCLUSION: There are small change in the cartilage contact pressure between stair ascent and stair descent, indicating that the joint adjusts the contact pressure by increasing the contact area.

Increasing Trunk Mass Evokes Lower Extremity Biomechanical Plasticity during Stair Descent.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of simulated changes in body mass on lower extremity joint work and relative joint contributions during stair descent. Ten healthy recreationally active college-age participants performed five stair descent trials in each of five loading conditions: no added load and with an additional 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% of their body weight. Three-dimensional ankle, knee and hip joint powers were calculated using a six degree-of-freedom model in Visual3D (C-Motion Inc., Germantown, MD, USA). Sagittal plane joint work was calculated as the joint power curve integrated with respect to time during the period between initial contact and toe off. Prism 9.0 (GraphPad Inc., San Diego, CA) was used to perform univariate 1 × 5 repeated measures analyses of variance to determine the effect of added mass on absolute and relative joint work values for total and for each lower extremity joint independently. Increasing added mass was associated with greater total lower extremity negative work during the stair descent task (p < 0.001). At the ankle, increasing added mass was associated with increasing magnitudes of negative joint work. Increasing added mass was associated with greater relative contributions of the ankle and reduced knee contributions to total negative lower extremity joint work (p = 0.014 and p = 0.006). The current findings demonstrated increases in ankle joint contributions to total lower extremity work while knee joint contributions to total lower extremity work were reduced in response to increasing added mass.

BioMAT: An Open-Source Biomechanics Multi-Activity Transformer for Joint Kinematic Predictions Using Wearable Sensors.

Through wearable sensors and deep learning techniques, biomechanical analysis can reach beyond the lab for clinical and sporting applications. Transformers, a class of recent deep learning models, have become widely used in state-of-the-art artificial intelligence research due to their superior performance in various natural language processing and computer vision tasks. The performance of transformer models has not yet been investigated in biomechanics applications. In this study, we introduce a Biomechanical Multi-activity Transformer-based model, BioMAT, for the estimation of joint kinematics from streaming signals of multiple inertia measurement units (IMUs) using a publicly available dataset. This dataset includes IMU signals and the corresponding sagittal plane kinematics of the hip, knee, and ankle joints during multiple activities of daily living. We evaluated the model's performance and generalizability and compared it against a convolutional neural network long short-term model, a bidirectional long short-term model, and multi-linear regression across different ambulation tasks including level ground walking (LW), ramp ascent (RA), ramp descent (RD), stair ascent (SA), and stair descent (SD). To investigate the effect of different activity datasets on prediction accuracy, we compared the performance of a universal model trained on all activities against task-specific models trained on individual tasks. When the models were tested on three unseen subjects' data, BioMAT outperformed the benchmark models with an average root mean square error (RMSE) of 5.5 ± 0.5°, and normalized RMSE of 6.8 ± 0.3° across all three joints and all activities. A unified BioMAT model demonstrated superior performance compared to individual task-specific models across four of five activities. The RMSE values from the universal model for LW, RA, RD, SA, and SD activities were 5.0 ± 1.5°, 6.2 ± 1.1°, 5.8 ± 1.1°, 5.3 ± 1.6°, and 5.2 ± 0.7° while these values for task-specific models were, 5.3 ± 2.1°, 6.7 ± 2.0°, 6.9 ± 2.2°, 4.9 ± 1.4°, and 5.6 ± 1.3°, respectively. Overall, BioMAT accurately estimated joint kinematics relative to previous machine learning algorithms across different activities directly from the sequence of IMUs signals instead of time-normalized gait cycle data.

Functional effects of arthroscopic modified Broström procedure on lateral ankle instability: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the mechanical and functional effects of the arthroscopic modified Broström procedure (AMBP) on patients with lateral ankle instability. METHODS: Eight patients with unilateral ankle instability treated with AMBP and eight healthy subjects were recruited. Healthy subjects, preoperative and one-year postoperative patients were assessed using outcome scales and the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) for dynamic postural control. One-dimensional statistical parametric mapping was performed to compare ankle angle and muscle activation curve during stair descent. RESULTS: The patients with lateral ankle instability showed good clinical outcomes and increased posterior lateral reach during the SEBT after the AMBP (p = 0.046). The medial gastrocnemius activation after initial contact was reduced (p = 0.049), and the peroneal longus activation after initial contact was promoted (p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: The AMBP has functional effects of promoting dynamic postural control and peroneal longus activation within one year of follow-up, which can benefit patients with functional ankle instability. However, the medial gastrocnemius activation was unexpectedly reduced post operation.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Stair Ambulation Using Impedance Control on an Active Prosthesis.

Active prostheses can provide net positive work to individuals with amputation, offering more versatility across locomotion tasks than passive prostheses. However, the effect of powered joints on bilateral biomechanics has not been widely explored for ambulation modes different than level ground and treadmill walking. In this study, we present the bilateral biomechanics of stair ascent and descent with a powered knee-ankle prosthesis compared to the biomechanical profiles of able-bodied subjects at different configurations of stair height between 102 mm and 178 mm. In addition, we include reference profiles from users with passive prostheses for the nominal stair height of 152 mm to place our findings in relation to the typical solution for individuals with transfemoral amputation (TFA). We report the biomechanical profiles of kinematics, kinetics, and power, together with temporal and waveform symmetry and distribution of mechanical energy across the joints. We found that an active prosthesis provides a substantial contribution to mechanical power during stair ascent and power absorption during stair descent and gait patterns like able-bodied subjects. The active prosthesis enables step-over-step gait in stair ascent. This translates into a lower mechanical energy requirement on the intact side, with a 57% reduction of energy at the knee and 26% at the hip with respect to the passive prosthesis. For stair descent, we found a 28% reduction in the negative work done by the intact ankle. These results reflect the benefit of active prostheses, allowing the users to complete tasks more efficiently than passive legs. However, in comparison to able-bodied biomechanics, the results still differ from the ideal patterns. We discuss the limitations that explain this difference and suggest future directions for the design of impedance controllers by taking inspiration from the biological modulation of the knee moment as a function of the stair height.

Concomitant osteochondral lesions of the talus affect the stair descent biomechanics of patients with chronic ankle instability: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies on the kinematics of patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI) that did not incorporate MRI and arthroscopic assessment could not differentiate between patients with CAI without osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT) and patients with CAI and OLT and have thus presented contradictory results. RESEARCH QUESTION: This study aimed to investigate the kinematic and electromyographic differences between patients with and without OLT. METHODS: Sixteen subjects with CAI (eight without OLT and eight with OLT confirmed through MRI and arthroscopic assessment) and eight healthy subjects underwent gait analysis in a stair descent setting. The three groups' patient-reported outcomes; ankle joint range of motion in flexion, inversion and rotation; and muscle activation of the peroneus, tibialis anterior, and gastrocnemius during a gait cycle were analyzed and compared. A curve analysis, namely, one-dimensional statistical parametric mapping, was performed to compare the dynamic ankle kinematics and muscle activation curves over the entire normalized time series. RESULTS: The patients with and without OLT had no difference in patient-reported outcomes. The maximal ankle plantarflexion of the patients without OLT and the healthy subjects was significantly larger than that of patients with OLT (p = 0.005). The maximal ankle internal rotation of patients without OLT was significantly larger than that of patients with OLT (p = 0.048). The peroneal activation during 0-6% of the gait cycle of patients with OLT was reduced compared with the healthy subjects. SIGNIFICANCE: Patients with CAI and OLT and patients with CAI without OLT have no difference in patient-reported outcomes, but patients with OLT can be differentiated using the post-initial-contact peroneal activation deficit and the restriction of ankle plantarflexion and internal rotation during stair descent. These variables can be utilized to monitor the function of patients with CAI and their possibility of developing OLT.

Within-day test-retest reliability of an accelerometer-based method for registration of step time symmetry during stair descent after ACL reconstruction and in healthy subjects.

Background: Symmetry during stair descent can potentially be used as an early functional measure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). We have developed a novel application of a single accelerometer-based inertial motion unit (IMU) to identify foot strikes and calculate step times in an ordinary stairway.Purpose: To examine within-day test-retest reliability and measurement error of step time and step time symmetry measured with a body-fixed IMU during stair descent in subjects early after ACLR and in healthy subjects.Methods: Subjects after ACLR were tested twice 6 weeks (N = 15) and twice 3 months (N = 26) postoperatively. Eighteen healthy subjects were tested twice on one occasion. Subjects descended a flight of stairs at preferred speed. Trunk accelerometry data were collected with an inertial motion unit (IMU). Mean step times (MSTs) and limb symmetry index (LSI) of MSTs were calculated. Clinical trials registration number: NCT01279759.Results: Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC (1,1)) for within test-retest reliability varied from 0.87 to 0.96 for MSTs and from 0.58 to 0.87 for LSIs. The 95% confidence interval (CI) for a true value varied from ± 0.02 seconds (s) to ± 0.05 s for MSTs and from ± 4.6 percentage points (pp) to ± 6.6 pp for LSIs.Conclusion: Mean step times measured with a body-fixed IMU during stair descent and limb symmetry indexes calculated from these mean step times are precise and reliable during early post-operative rehabilitation after ACLR and in healthy subjects.

Altered biomechanics in bilateral total knee replacement patients during stair negotiation.

BACKGROUND: Many total knee replacement (TKR) patients need to have a contralateral knee replacement. Biomechanical differences between first and second replaced limbs of bilateral TKR have not been examined during stair negotiation. Additionally, it is unknown whether hip and ankle biomechanics of bilateral patients are altered. We examined hip, knee, and ankle biomechanics of first and second replaced limbs bilateral patients, as well as replaced and non-replaced limbs of unilateral patients, during stair ascent and descent. METHODS: Eleven bilateral TKR patients (70.09 ± 5.41 years, 1.71 ± 0.08 m, 91.78 ± 13.00 kg) and 15 unilateral TKR patients (64.93 ± 5.11 years, 1.75 ± 0.09 m, 89.18 ± 17.55 kg) were recruited. Patients performed three to five trials of stair ascent and descent. The second step, during ascent, was the step of interest when analyzing each limb. A 2 × 2 (limb × group) analysis of variance was performed to determine differences between limbs and groups. RESULTS: During ascent, bilateral patients exhibited decreased peak loading-response knee extension (KEM) and push-off plantarflexion moments. Unilateral replaced limb KEM was lower than non-replaced limbs. During descent, bilateral patients descended the staircase significantly slower, had lower peak loading-response vertical ground reaction force and KEM, and push-off KEM. Bilateral patients had higher peak loading-response hip extension and push-off plantarflexion moments, and increased knee adduction ROM, compared with unilateral TKA patients. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral patients exhibited similar hip, knee, and ankle joint moments between first and second replaced limbs. Substantial differences in hip, knee, and ankle biomechanics during stair negotiation in bilateral patients compared with unilateral patients may indicate a more complex adaptation strategy present in these patients.

Descending 13 real world steps: A dataset and analysis of stair descent.

BACKGROUND: Stair descent analysis has been typically limited to laboratory staircases of 4 or 5 steps. To date there has been no report of gait parameters during unconstrained stair descent outside of the laboratory, and few motion capture datasets are publicly available. RESEARCH QUESTION: We aim to collect a dataset and perform gait analysis for stair descent outside of the laboratory. We aim to measure basic kinematic and kinetic gait parameters and foot placement behavior. METHODS: We present a public stair descent dataset from 101 unimpaired participants aged 18-35 on an unconstrained 13-step staircase collected using wearable sensors. The dataset consists of kinematics (full-body joint angle and position), kinetics (plantar normal forces, acceleration), and foot placement for 30,609 steps. RESULTS: We report the lower limb joint angle ranges (30° and 8° for hip flexion and extension, 85° and -11° for knee flexion and extension, and 31° and 28° for ankle dorsi- and plantar-flexion). The self-selected speed was 0.79 ± 0.16 m/s, with cycle duration of 0.97 ± 0.18 s. Mean foot overhang as a percentage of foot length was 17.07 ± 6.66 %, and we calculate that foot size explains only 6% of heel placement variation, but 79% of toe placement variation. We also find a minor but significant asymmetry between left and right maximum hip flexion angle, though all other measured parameters were symmetrical. SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first quantitative observation of gait data from a large number (n = 101) of participants descending an unconstrained staircase outside of a laboratory. This study enables analysis of gait characteristics including self-selected walking speed and foot placement to better understand typical stair gait behavior. The dataset is a public resource for understanding typical stair descent.

Increasing the contrast of tread edge highlighters improves stair descent safety in older adults with simulated visual impairment.

Falls during stair descent are dangerous and costly. Contrasting tread edge highlighters improve measures of stair safety, however the necessary contrast level of these interventions has not been investigated. Thirteen older adults (67.7 ± 5.5 years) completed stair descent trials under normal (300lx) and low (30lx) lighting conditions, blurred and normal vision, and four different contrast levels (0%, 30%, 50%, 70%) between the tread edge highlighter and the neighbouring tread surface. Cadence and heel clearance decreased for 0% contrast compared to 50% and 70% contrast conditions, but contrast had no effect on foot overhang. Blurred vision was observed to be a greater factor influencing biomechanical measures of fall risk than low ambient lighting. Results suggest higher contrast highlighters improve measures of safety, even more so during simulated vision impairment, and that at least 50% contrast difference provides adequate visual information for safer stair ambulation.

Energy absorption at lower limb joints in different foot contact strategies while descending stairs.

BACKGROUND: Joint loads in different walking strategies during stair descent have been investigated in terms of the joint moment in association with the risk of osteoarthritis. However, the absorption mechanisms of the potential energy loss are not known. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the mechanical energy absorptions in lower limb joints in different initial foot contact strategies. METHODS: Nineteen young subjects walked down on instrumented stairs with two different strategies, i.e., forefoot and rearfoot strike. Power and energy at lower limb joints during stance phase were compared between strategies. RESULTS: Lower limb joints absorbed 73 ± 11% of the potential energy released by descending stairs and there was no difference between strategies. Rearfoot strategy absorbed less energy than forefoot strategy at the ankle joint in the 1st phase, which was compensated mainly by more energy absorption at the knee in the 2nd phase and less energy generation at the hip joints in the 3rd phase. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that a leg absorbs most of the potential energy while descending stairs irrespective of the walking strategies and that any reduction of energy absorption at one joint is compensated by other joints. Greater energy absorption at the knee joint compared to the other joints suggests high burden of knee joint muscles and connective tissues during stair-descent, which is even more significant for the rearfoot strike strategy.

Consumer opinion of stair descent devices used during emergency evacuation from high-rise buildings.

The use of stair descent devices is an important part of a comprehensive emergency evacuation plan. To date, there is little research on consumer opinion of these devices. A pilot study was performed at a local center for independent living, enabling 14 consumers with mobility impairments to state their initial impressions of 14 devices, representing three general designs: carry-type, track-type, and sled-type. Consumers were able to view the devices, ask questions, and view short videos of the devices in use. Afterwards, consumers were given the opportunity to try out one or more of the devices, and provide their opinion after each trial run. Consumers provided feedback on specific design features, how they anticipated they would feel about using each, and whether they considered each device acceptable for use. Trial use enabled more in-depth opinions, and in some cases, a change in opinion on acceptability.

Tibio-femoral kinematics of the healthy knee joint throughout complete cycles of gait activities.

Accurate assessment of 3D tibio-femoral kinematics is essential for understanding knee joint functionality, but also provides a basis for assessing joint pathologies and the efficacy of musculoskeletal interventions. Until now, however, the assessment of functional kinematics in healthy knees has been mostly restricted to the loaded stance phase of gait, and level walking only, but the most critical conditions for the surrounding soft tissues are known to occur during high-flexion activities. This study aimed to determine the ranges of tibio-femoral rotation and condylar translation as well as provide evidence on the location of the centre of rotation during multiple complete cycles of different gait activities. Based on radiographic images captured using moving fluoroscopy in ten healthy subjects during multiple cycles of level walking, downhill walking and stair descent, 3D femoral and tibial poses were reconstructed to provide a comprehensive description of tibio-femoral kinematics. Despite a significant increase in joint flexion, the condylar antero-posterior range of motion remained comparable across all activities, with mean translations of 6.3-8.3 mm and 7.3-9.3 mm for the medial and lateral condyles respectively. Only the swing phase of level walking and stair descent exhibited a significantly greater range of motion for the lateral over the medial compartment. Although intra-subject variability was low, considerable differences in joint kinematics were observed between subjects. The observed subject-specific movement patterns indicate that accurate assessment of individual pre-operative kinematics together with individual implant selection and/or surgical implantation decisions might be necessary before further improvement to joint replacement outcome can be achieved.

Effects of tai chi on postural control during dual-task stair negotiation in knee osteoarthritis: a randomised controlled trial protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Stair ascent and descent require complex integration between sensory and motor systems; individuals with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) have an elevated risk for falls and fall injuries, which may be in part due to poor dynamic postural control during locomotion. Tai chi exercise has been shown to reduce fall risks in the ageing population and is recommended as one of the non-pharmocological therapies for people with KOA. However, neuromuscular mechanisms underlying the benefits of tai chi for persons with KOA are not clearly understood. Postural control deficits in performing a primary motor task may be more pronounced when required to simultaneously attend to a cognitive task. This single-blind, parallel design randomised controlled trial (RCT) aims to evaluate the effects of a 12-week tai chi programme versus balance and postural control training on neuromechanical characteristics during dual-task stair negotiation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Sixty-six participants with KOA will be randomised into either tai chi or balance and postural control training, each at 60 min per session, twice weekly for 12 weeks. Assessed at baseline and 12 weeks (ie, postintervention), the primary outcomes are attention cost and dynamic postural stability during dual-task stair negotiation. Secondary outcomes include balance and proprioception, foot clearances, self-reported symptoms and function. A telephone follow-up to assess symptoms and function will be conducted at 20 weeks. The findings will help determine whether tai chi is beneficial on dynamic stability and in reducing fall risks in older adults with KOA patients in community. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Rehabilitation Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (#2018KY-006-1). Study findings will be disseminated through presentations at scientific conferences or publications in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR1800018028.