Real-world efficacy of a teriparatide biosimilar (RGB-10) compared with reference teriparatide on bone mineral density, trabecular bone score, and bone parameters assessed using quantitative ultrasound, 3D-SHAPER® and high-resolution peripheral computer tomography in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and very high fracture risk.

A retrospective analysis comparing a teriparatide biosimilar (RGB-10) with reference teriparatide for osteoporosis treatment in postmenopausal women at high fracture risk found them to be therapeutically equivalent. Both provided significant improvements in lumber spine BMD, TBS, and other parameters of bone health, assessed using multiple diagnostic methods. PURPOSE: To compare the therapeutic efficacy of a teriparatide biosimilar (RGB-10) with reference teriparatide for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women at very high fracture risk. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 25 postmenopausal female patients treated for osteoporosis with RGB-10 for 24 months and a matched cohort of 25 patients treated with reference teriparatide. The following outcomes were assessed at baseline, 12 and 24 months: bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and integral, trabecular and cortical volumetric and surface BMD using 3D-SHAPER® imaging, trabecular bone score (TBS), quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurements, and high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) imaging of the radius and tibia. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between treatment groups in any of the measured parameters of BMD or bone health at baseline as well as in any timepoint when assessed using these various diagnostic methods. Both compounds provided equivalent significant improvements from baseline in measures of osteoporosis and fracture risk. CONCLUSION: The results of the analysis demonstrate the therapeutic equivalence of the teriparatide biosimilar (RGB-10) to reference teriparatide for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women at very high risk of fracture.

Acceleration of Preexisting Aortic Stenosis After Teriparatide Initiation.

Background/Objective: Teriparatide, an osteoanabolic agent similar to parathyroid hormone in properties, is used to manage severe osteoporosis. Aortic valve stenosis is a common valve condition observed in the elderly. Its natural history includes gradual progression toward severity. We present a case of a patient who had rapidly progressive aortic stenosis after teriparatide initiation. Case Report: An 84-year-old woman who was diagnosed with osteoporosis was treated with oral bisphosphonates. When she had spinal compression fractures, she was found to have primary hyperparathyroidism. She underwent parathyroidectomy and was treated with denosumab infusions every 6 months. However, after she experienced bilateral atypical femoral fractures, she was switched to teriparatide daily injections. Her laboratory test results showed a calcium level of 10 mg/dL (reference range, 8.5-10.2 mg/dL), 25-hydroxyvitamin D level of 38.2 ng/mL (reference range, 31.0-80.0 ng/mL), and phosphorus level of 3.3 mg/dL (reference, range, 2.7-4.8 mg/dL). On reviewing echocardiograms before and after teriparatide initiation, we found a rapid progression of her aortic stenosis from moderate to severe based on the mean gradients (23 to 40 mm Hg) and peak velocities (3.09 to 4 m/s), over a span of 10 months. She eventually required valve replacement. Discussion: Natural progression of mild to severe aortic stenosis typically occurs at the rate of 3 to 7 mm Hg per year over several years. Chronic exposure of human valvular endothelial cells to parathyroid hormone can trigger endothelial dysfunction and valvular calcification. Conclusion: In patients with preexisting aortic stenosis, coordination of care with cardiology and echocardiographic monitoring while on therapy may be considered.

Effects of differences in dose and frequency of teriparatide on bone structure in Proximal Femur. - Analysis by DXA-based 3D-modeling (3D-SHAPER Software) -TRIPLE-BONE study (The effects of TeRIParatide preparation on bone mineraL density increase and BONE structure).

Trends toward more favorable improvement of the cortical bone parameters by once-weekly (56.5 µg once a week) and twice-weekly teriparatide (28.2 µg twice a week), and that of the trabecular bone parameters by once-daily (1/D) teriparatide (20 µg/day once a day) were shown. PURPOSE: To examine the effects of differences in the amount of teriparatide (TPTD) per administration and its dosing frequency on the bone structure in the proximal femur by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-based 3D-modeling (3D-SHAPER software). METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective study. Patients aged 50 years or older with primary osteoporosis who continuously received once-/twice-weekly (1・2/W, n = 60) or 1/D TPTD (n = 14) administration for at least one year were included in the study. Measurement regions included the femoral neck (FN), trochanter (TR), femoral shaft (FS), and total proximal hip (TH). Concurrently, the bone mineral density (BMD) and Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) were measured. RESULTS: The cross-sectional area, cross-sectional moment of inertia, and section modulus in the FS were significantly improved in the 1・2/W TPTD group, as compared to the 1/D TPTD group. However, significant improvement of the cortical thickness and buckling ratio in the FN was observed in the 1/D TPTD group, as compared to the 1・2/W TPTD group. Trabecular BMD values in the FS and TH were significantly increased in the 1/D TPTD group, as compared to the 1・2/W TPTD group, while the cortical BMD values in the TR, FS, and TH were significantly increased in the 1・2/W TPTD group, as compared to the 1/D TPTD group. CONCLUSION: Trends toward more favorable improvement of the cortical bone by 1・2/W TPTD and that of the trabecular bones by 1/D TPTD were observed.

The comparative effect of teriparatide and denosumab on activins, follistatins and inhibins in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

The activins-follistatins-inhibins (AFI) hormonal system affects bone metabolism. Treatments that alter bone metabolism may also alter the AFI molecules. In this non-randomized, open-label, head-to-head comparative study, circulating levels of the AFI system were evaluated in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated for 12 months with either teriparatide (n = 23) or denosumab (n = 22). Τeriparatide treatment increased activin B (p = 0.01) and activin AB (p = 0.004) and the ratios activin A/follistatin (p = 0.006), activin B/follistatin (p = 0.007), activin AB/follistatin (p < 0.001) and activin AB/FSTL3 (p = 0.034). The significant p for trend in group*time interactions of activins B and AB and of the ratio activin AB/FSTL3 remained robust after adjustment for body mass index (BMI) and lumbar spine bone mineral density (LS BMD) but it was lost for activin B after adjustment for previous antiresorptive treatment. The effect of teriparatide on BMD was attenuated when it was adjusted for baseline activins levels or their 12-month changes. No changes were observed after denosumab treatment. In conclusion, activins B and AB, as well as the ratios of all activins to follistatin and of activin AB to FSTL3 increased with teriparatide treatment, possibly in a compensatory manner. Future studies are needed to study the potentially important role activins may play in bone biology and any associations with the effect of teriparatide on BMD.

Bone and the muscle, comprise two tissues that are considered to interact with each other, not only through mechanical but also through endocrine signals. Several components of the activins-follistatins-inhibins (AFI) hormonal system have been shown to be secreted by the muscle and affect the bone possibly contributing to this interplay. We have previously investigated levels of the AFI molecules in case­control studies and reported differences between osteoporotic versus osteopenic versus postmenopausal and premenopausal women with normal bone mineral density (BMD). In this 12-month, non-randomized, open-labeled, head-to-head comparative study, we prospectively compared the effect of antiosteoporotic agents with opposite effect on bone metabolism, i.e., teriparatide versus denosumab, on the circulating concentrations of all known molecules of the AFI system in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. We observed increases of activins after teriparatide treatment, but no effect after denosumab treatment on any of the AFI molecules studied. Since activins are mainly acting in an autocrine way and since activin B and AB have not been extensively studied, further studies in the basic research, preclinical and clinical research fields are required to expand these observations and fully elucidate physiology and any therapeutic potential.

Change in spinal bone mineral density as estimated by Hounsfield units following osteoporosis treatment with romosozumab, teriparatide, denosumab, and alendronate: an analysis of 318 patients.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of osteoporosis medications on opportunistic CT-based Hounsfield units (HU). METHODS: Spine and nonspine surgery patients were retrospectively identified who had been treated with romosozumab for 3 to 12 months, teriparatide for 3 to 12 months, teriparatide for > 12 months, denosumab for > 12 months, or alendronate for > 12 months. HU were measured in the L1-4 vertebral bodies. One-way ANOVA was used to compare the mean change in HU among the five treatment regimens. RESULTS: In total, 318 patients (70% women) were included, with a mean age of 69 years and mean BMI of 27 kg/m2. There was a significant difference in mean HU improvement (p < 0.001) following treatment with romosozumab for 3 to 12 months (n = 32), teriparatide for 3 to 12 months (n = 30), teriparatide for > 12 months (n = 44), denosumab for > 12 months (n = 123), and alendronate for > 12 months (n = 100). Treatment with romosozumab for a mean of 10.5 months significantly increased the mean HU by 26%, from a baseline of 85 to 107 (p = 0.012). Patients treated with teriparatide for > 12 months (mean 23 months) experienced a mean HU improvement of 25%, from 106 to 132 (p = 0.039). Compared with the mean baseline HU, there was no significant difference after treatment with teriparatide for 3 to 12 months (110 to 119, p = 0.48), denosumab for > 12 months (105 to 107, p = 0.68), or alendronate for > 12 months (111 to 113, p = 0.80). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with romosozumab for a mean of 10.5 months and teriparatide for a mean of 23 months experienced improved spinal bone mineral density as estimated by CT-based opportunistic HU. Given the shorter duration of effective treatment, romosozumab may be the preferred medication for optimization of osteoporotic patients in preparation for elective spine fusion surgery.

Effects of daily teriparatide, weekly high-dose teriparatide, or bisphosphonate on cortical and trabecular bone of vertebra and proximal femur in postmenopausal women with fragility fracture: Sub-analysis by quantitative computed tomography from the TERABIT study.

PURPOSE: The effects of daily teriparatide (D-PTH, 20 µg/day), weekly high-dose teriparatide (W-PTH, 56.5 µg/week), or bisphosphonate (BP) on the vertebra and proximal femur were investigated using quantitative computed tomography (QCT). METHODS: A total of 131 postmenopausal women with a history of fragility fractures were randomized to receive D-PTH, W-PTH, or bisphosphonate (oral alendronate or risedronate). QCT were evaluated at baseline and after 18 months of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 86 participants were evaluated by QCT (Spine: D-PTH: 25, W-PTH: 21, BP: 29. Hip: PTH: 22, W-PTH: 21, BP: 32. Dropout rate: 30.5 %). QCT of the vertebra showed that D-PTH, W-PTH, and BP increased total vBMD (+34.8 %, +18.2 %, +11.1 %), trabecular vBMD (+50.8 %, +20.8 %, +12.2 %), and marginal vBMD (+20.0 %, +14.0 %, +11.5 %). The increase in trabecular vBMD was greater in the D-PTH group than in the W-PTH and BP groups. QCT of the proximal femur showed that D-PTH, W-PTH, and BP increased total vBMD (+2.8 %, +3.6 %, +3.2 %) and trabecular vBMD (+7.7 %, +5.1 %, +3.4 %), while only W-PTH and BP significantly increased cortical vBMD (-0.1 %, +1.5 %, +1.6 %). Although there was no significant increase in cortical vBMD in the D-PTH group, cortical bone volume (BV) increased in all three treatment groups (+2.1 %, +3.6 %, +3.1 %). CONCLUSIONS: D-PTH had a strong effect on trabecular bone of vertebra. Although D-PTH did not increase cortical BMD of proximal femur, it increased cortical BV. W-PTH had a moderate effect on trabecular bone of vertebra, while it increased both cortical BMD and BV of proximal femur. Although BP had a limited effect on trabecular bone of vertebra compared to teriparatide, it increased both cortical BMD and BV of proximal femur.

Comparing musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorder risks of teriparatide and abaloparatide in osteoporosis: an analysis based on FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS).

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis (OP), characterized by low bone mass and increased fracture risk, is a prevalent skeletal disorder. Teriparatide (TP) and abaloparatide (ABL) are anabolic agents that may reduce fracture incidence, but their impact on musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (MCTD) risk is uncertain. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective, observational disproportionality analysis was conducted utilizing FAERS data from Q1 2004 to Q3 2023, where TP or ABL was identified as the primary suspect drug. Multiple data mining algorithms, including reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS), were employed to detect MCTD safety signals. RESULTS: A total of 366,747 TP-related and 422,377 ABL-related cases were identified, predominantly among female patients aged ≥45 years. The top specific AEs involved musculoskeletal, connective tissue, and administration site disorders. Comparative analysis revealed a higher frequency of AEs related to the nervous, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal systems for ABL compared to TP. Both drugs exhibited strong signals for arthralgia, limb pain, back pain, muscle spasms, bone pain, muscle pain, and muscle weakness. CONCLUSION: The analysis suggests a potential MCTD risk with TP and ABL treatment in OP patients, highlighting the need for AE monitoring and management in clinical practice. This contributes to a better understanding of the safety profiles of these anabolic medications.

Low bone mineral density: a primer for the spine surgeon.

Within spinal surgery, low bone mineral density is associated with several postoperative complications, such as proximal junctional kyphosis, pseudoarthrosis, and screw loosening. Although modalities such as CT and MRI can be utilized to assess bone quality, DEXA scans, the "Gold Standard" for diagnosing osteoporosis, is not routinely included in preoperative workup. With an increasing prevalence of osteoporosis in an aging population, it is critical for spine surgeons to understand the importance of evaluating bone mineral density preoperatively to optimize postoperative outcomes. The purpose of this state-of-the-art review is to provide surgeons a summary of the evaluation, treatment, and implications of low bone mineral density in patients who are candidates for spine surgery.

The Effectiveness and Safety of Romosozumab and Teriparatide in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this observational study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of romosozumab (ROMO) and teriparatide (TPTD) in a clinical setting. METHODS: 315 postmenopausal women were included based on the reimbursement criteria for ROMO and TPTD at the Department of Endocrinology at Aarhus University Hospital. ROMO: Bone Mineral Density (BMD) T-score <-2.5 (femoral neck (FN), total hip (TH), or lumbar spine (LS)) + a fragility fracture (hip, spine, pelvis, distal forearm, or proximal humerus) within 3 years. TPTD: Within 3 years ≥2 vertebral fractures or 1 vertebral fracture + BMD T-score (FN, TH, or LS) <-3. Data was collected from medical records. The primary end point was percentage change from baseline in BMD (FN, TH, and LS) at month 12. BMD was measured by DXA. RESULTS: At month 12 ROMO led to significantly (p<0.001) larger increases than TPTD in BMD (FN: 4.8% vs. 0.2%, TH: 5.7% vs. 0.3%, and LS: 13.7% vs. 9.3%). Discontinuation rate was lower with ROMO than with TPTD. Lower incidence of cardiovascular adverse events was observed with ROMO compared to TPTD. Treatment-naïve patients had non-significantly higher BMD increases compared to previously treated patients with both ROMO and TPTD. CONCLUSION: Treatment with romosozumab yields larger increases in bone mineral density than teriparatide after 12 months and a higher rate of completion.

Clinical effects of teriparatide, abaloparatide, and romosozumab in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

In the management of osteoporosis, anti-resorptive agents serve as a primary therapeutic approach. However, in cases where individuals exhibit an increased susceptibility to fractures, such as those characterized by severe low bone mass or a history of vertebral or hip fractures that markedly diminish life expectancy, the immediate reduction of fracture risk through the administration of osteoanabolic agents could be beneficial. Teriparatide, available in daily, once-weekly, or twice-weekly dosages, along with abaloparatide and romosozumab, constitutes a trio of such agents. Each of these medications is defined by unique characteristics, distinct efficacy profiles, and specific adverse effects. There is growing evidence to suggest that these agents have a superior effect on enhancing bone mineral density and reducing fracture incidence when compared to traditional bisphosphonate therapies. Nonetheless, their employment demands thorough consideration of clinical indications, which includes evaluating economic factors, the frequency of injections required, and the potential for adverse effects. The objective of this review is to consolidate the current evidence focusing primarily on the efficacy of these agents, with the goal of enhancing understanding and aiding in making more informed treatment decisions, particularly for those individuals who are at an elevated risk of fractures.

Effective strategies for pregnancy and lactation-associated osteoporosis: teriparatide use in focus.

INTRODUCTION: Pregnancy and lactation-associated osteoporosis (PLO) is a rare condition characterized by fragility fractures occurring during late pregnancy or lactation, primarily affecting the spine and causing significant morbidity and back pain. PLO can lead to mobility impairment and work incapacity, with recovery taking up to several years. Due to the lack of clinical trials, treatment strategies remain poorly defined, historically focusing on calcium supplements, vitamin D, and weaning from breastfeeding. However, recent attention has turned to teriparatide (TPD) as an option due to its anabolic properties and potential suitability for women of childbearing age. METHODS: This review evaluates TPD's use in PLO treatment, using published systematic reviews and case studies. Over 300 cases with PLO were identified through PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane searches until August 2023. RESULTS: We identified 175 cases with PLO treated with TPD alone or followed by antiresorptive therapy. Most women (85.7%) were primiparas. The mean ± SD duration of TPD use was 15 ± 6 months. Among the study patients, 91.4% used TPD alone, while 8.6% (15/175) utilized sequential therapy. Approximately 93% of our cohort exhibited potential risk factors for PLO. Despite the increased risk of recurrent fractures in PLO, only 14.7% (20/175) of those treated with TPD sustained new fractures during a 9-month to 9 years' follow-up period. The mean ± SD percent increase in BMD at the LS was 21.14% ± 7.4%, and at the FN it was 12.1% ± 9.3%. The baseline Z-scores at the LS ranged from -3.3 (-3.7 to -2.7), while the baseline Z-scores at the FN ranged from -2.0 (-2.7 to -1.5). CONCLUSION: This review emphasizes PLO severity, advocating for increased awareness and timely interventions. TPD emerges as a promising therapeutic option in certain cases.

A crossover comparison of patient satisfaction with two teriparatide regimens: primary results of the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial 06 (JOINT-06).

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare treatment satisfaction with two dosing regimens (two teriparatide [TPTD] self-injection systems) in osteoporosis patients at high risk of fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this open-label crossover randomized trial comparing self-injected once-daily (1/D)-TPTD with self-injected twice-weekly (2/W)-TPTD, three satisfaction variables were evaluated by questionnaire for 2 years. The primary endpoint was overall satisfaction and secondary endpoints were satisfaction with treatment effectiveness and with utility of the self-injection device. Changes in quality of life (QOL) assessed by EuroQol-5 Dimension, pain assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS), and anthropometric parameters were also analyzed. Safety was evaluated based on the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: The 1/D-TPTD and 2/W-TPTD groups consisted of 180 (75.9 ± 7.3 years) and 179 (age: 75.5 ± 6.9 years) patients, respectively. After 26 weeks of treatment, no significant between-group difference in the persistence rate (79.4% vs 72.6% in the 1/D-TPTD and 2/W-TPTD groups, respectively), distributions of overall satisfaction scores, and satisfaction with treatment (p > 0.05) were observed. However, several items of satisfaction with the utility of the injection device were significantly higher in the 2/W-TPTD group (p < 0.05). Statistical improvements from baseline values were observed in QOL and pain VAS in both groups (p < 0.05). No serious AEs were reported. CONCLUSION: The between-group similarity of overall treatment satisfaction and effectiveness scores and between-group difference in satisfaction with the utility of the self-injection device was useful information for real-world treatment of osteoporosis. Both medication regimens were well tolerated.

Bioequivalence of Recombinant Human Teriparatide Injection in Healthy Adult Female Subjects in the Fasting State.

A single-center, randomized, open, 2-period, self-crossover, single-dose trial was conducted to evaluate the bioequivalence of the test (T) and reference (R) preparations in healthy adult female subjects under fasting conditions. Seventy-six subjects were enrolled in the study, and subjects were randomly divided into 2 groups at a 1:1 ratio and were administered once per period, with a 4-day washout period. In each period, plasma drug concentrations, blood calcium changes, and antibodies were determined for pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity analysis, respectively, and adverse events were recorded for safety analysis. The 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios (T:R) of maximum plasma concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration, and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity were within the predefined bioequivalence criterion of 80%-125%, indicating bioequivalence between the T and R preparations under fasting conditions. Comparable serum calcium levels demonstrated pharmacodynamics similarity, and no differences were found in immunogenicity profiles. Additionally, the incidence of adverse reactions to the T preparation was 18.4% lower than that of the R preparation (31.6%). This study confirmed the bioequivalence of the T and R preparations under fasting conditions, along with comparable immunogenicity profiles and good safety.

The Effects of Longer Use of Teriparatide on Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes after Spinal Fusion in Geriatric Patients.

Background: Teriparatide is an anabolic agent for osteoporosis and is believed to improve the bone healing process. Previous studies showed that teriparatide could enhance not only fracture healing but also spine fusion. It has been reported that use of teriparatide could promote the spine fusion process and decrease mechanical complications. However, there was no consensus regarding optimal treatment duration. The purpose of this study was to compare surgical outcomes between short-duration and long-duration teriparatide treatment after lumbar fusion surgery in elderly patients. Materials and Methods: All consecutive patients older than 60 years who underwent 1-level lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative diseases between January 2015 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Based on the duration of teriparatide treatment (daily subcutaneous injection of 20 µg teriparatide), patients were subdivided into two groups: a short-duration (SD) group (<6 months) and a long-duration (LD) group (≥6 months). Mechanical complications, such as screw loosening, cage subsidence, and adjacent vertebral fractures, were investigated. Postoperative 1-year union rate was also evaluated on computed tomography. Clinical outcomes were recorded using visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Between-group differences for these radiographic and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Results: Ninety-one patients were reviewed in this study, including sixty patients in the SD group and thirty-one patients in the LD group. Their mean age was 72.3 ± 6.2 years, and 79 patients were female. Mean T-score was -3.3 ± 0.8. Cage subsidence (6.7% vs. 3.2%), screw loosening (28.3% vs. 35.5%), and adjacent vertebral fracture (6.7% vs. 9.7%) were not significantly different between the SD and LD groups. Union rate at 1-year postoperative was 65.0% in the SD group and 87.1% in the LD group (p = 0.028). Both groups showed improvement in VAS and ODI after surgery. However, the differences of VAS from preoperative to 6 months and 1 year postoperative were significantly higher in the LD group. Conclusions: Longer teriparatide treatment after lumbar fusion surgery resulted in a higher union rate at 1-year postoperative than the shorter treatment. Also, it could be more beneficial for clinical outcomes.

Looking Beyond the Usual Suspects: A Rare Case of Teriparatide-Induced Gynecomastia.

Teriparatide, an osteoanabolic agent, is a biosynthetic analogue of the 1-34 amino acids of human parathyroid hormone (PTH) used for the treatment of osteoporosis. It is typically well-tolerated; common side effects include headaches, arthralgias, nausea, and dizziness. In this report, we present a case of gynecomastia occurring shortly after initiating teriparatide therapy, associated with nipple sensitivity and breast tenderness. Secondary workup for various causes of gynecomastia was unremarkable. Finally, a decision was made to discontinue teriparatide due to the patient's concerns. The nipple sensitivity started improving shortly afterward, with complete resolution of gynecomastia 4 months later. Although this unusual side effect has been reported as a possibility in postmarketing studies, a chronological report on the occurrence of teriparatide-induced gynecomastia and its complete resolution after discontinuing teriparatide has not yet been published in the literature.

Teriparatide Does not Have Beneficial Effects on Bone Healing in Complete Atypical Femur Fractures.

Teriparatide is an anabolic drug sometimes administered to patients who have atypical femoral fracture (AFF). However, whether teriparatide has beneficial effects on bone healing remains uncertain. The present study aimed to analyze the association between teriparatide and bone healing in complete AFF. A total of 59 consecutive cases (58 patients) who underwent intramedullary nailing for complete AFF were categorized based on postoperative use of teriparatide into the non-teriparatide (non-TPTD, n = 34) and teriparatide groups (TPTD, n = 25). Time-to-bone union was evaluated and compared between the two groups. Additionally, multiple regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors affecting time-to-bone union. All participants were women, with a mean age of 77.6 years (range: 62-92). No significant difference in time-to-bone union was found between the non-TPTD and TPTD groups (5.5 months vs. 5.8 months, p = 0.359). Two patients in the non-TPTD group underwent reoperation (p = 0.503) due to failure caused by inadequate fixation, and both achieved bone healing after additional fixation with blocking screws. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the anterior gap of the fracture site postoperatively was a factor affecting time-to-bone union (p = 0.014). The beneficial effect of teriparatide on bone healing in complete AFF could not be confirmed. Additional randomized controlled trials are required. Nonetheless, appropriate techniques, including efforts to reduce the gap on the tensile side during the surgery, are important for reliable bone healing.

Romosozumab versus parathyroid hormone receptor agonists: which osteoanabolic to choose and when?

Osteoanabolic agents are used as a first line treatment in patients at high fracture risk. The PTH receptor 1 (PTH1R) agonists teriparatide (TPTD) and abaloparatide (ABL) increase bone formation, bone mineral density (BMD), and bone strength by activating PTH receptors on osteoblasts. Romosozumab (ROMO), a humanized monoclonal antibody against sclerostin, dramatically but transiently stimulates bone formation and persistently reduces bone resorption. Osteoanabolic agents increase BMD and bone strength while being more effective than antiresorptives in reducing fracture risk in postmenopausal women. However, direct comparisons of the antifracture benefits of osteoanabolic therapies are limited. In a direct comparison of TPTD and ABL, the latter resulted in greater BMD increases at the hip. While no differences in vertebral or non-vertebral fracture risk were observed between the two drugs, ABL led to a greater reduction of major osteoporotic fractures. Adverse event profiles were similar between the two agents except for hypercalcemia, which occurred more often with TPTD. No direct comparisons of fracture risk reduction between ROMO and the PTH1R agonists exist. Individual studies have shown greater increases in BMD and bone strength with ROMO compared with TPTD in treatment-naive women and in women previously treated with bisphosphonates. Some safety aspects, such as a history of tumor precluding the use of PTH1R agonists, and a history of major cardiovascular events precluding the use of ROMO, should also be considered when choosing between these agents. Finally, convenience of administration, reimbursement by national health systems and length of clinical experience may influence patient choice.