Trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab versus trifluridine-tipiracil monotherapy for chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Colorectal cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. The first and second lines of treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) include chemotherapy based on 5-fluorouracil. However, treatment following progression on the first and second line is still unclear. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for studies investigating the use of trifluridine-tipiracil with bevacizumab versus trifluridine-tipiracil alone for mCRC. We used RStudio version 4.2.3; and we considered p < 0.05 significant. Seven studies and 1,182 patients were included - 602 (51%) received trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab. Compared with control, the progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.42-0.63; p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.52-0.70; p < 0.001) were significantly higher with bevacizumab. The objective response rate (ORR) (RR 3.14; 95% CI 1.51-6.51; p = 0.002) and disease control rate (DCR) (RR 1.66; 95% CI 1.28-2.16; p = 0.0001) favored the intervention. Regarding adverse events, the intervention had a higher rate of neutropenia (RR 1.38; 95% CI 1.19-1.59; p = 0.00001), whereas the monotherapy group had a higher risk of anemia (RR 0.60; 95% CI 0.44-0.82; p = 0.001). Our results support that the addition of bevacizumab is associated with a significant benefit in PFS, OS, ORR and DCR.

Potential Risk Factors for Ocular Pain in Patients Undergoing Multiple Intravitreal Injections of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor.

Purpose: To assess ocular pain in patients undergoing multiple intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) who have previous factors that may influence pain sensitivity. Methodology: This is a prospective, observational, case series study involving patients who underwent multiple (≥3) pro re nata intravitreal injections of ranibizumab or aflibercept to treat any cause of chorioretinal vascular disease. Ocular pain was assessed by the numerical analog scale during intravitreal injection. For this study, the main variable was ocular pain and the secondary variables included age, sex, previous history of glaucoma, primary retinal vascular disease, severe dry eye history, trigeminal pain, scleral buckle surgery, collagen diseases, fibromyalgia, severe migraine history, pars plana vitrectomy, scleral thickness measurements, and type of anti-VEGF. Results: In a total of 894 patients, 948 eyes (4822 intravitreal injections), 793 patients (88.6%) had ocular pain sensitivity between no pain to mild pain, 80 patients (8.9%) had moderate ocular pain, 15 patients (1.6%) had severe ocular pain, and 6 patients (0.7%) had extremely severe ocular pain. Patients with severe dry eye (p = 0.01) and previous history of scleral buckle surgery (p = 0.01) showed a significant correlation with ocular pain during intravitreal injection. Pars plana scleral thickness (>550 um) and diabetic neuropathy were associated with ocular pain but did not meet the criteria for statistical significance (p = 0.09 and p = 0.06, respectively). Conclusion: Dry eye and prior scleral buckle surgery may contribute to pain associated with intravitreal injection. These issues should be taken into consideration in patients undergoing multiple intravitreal injections.

Clinical Risk Factors for Retinopathy of Prematurity Reactivation after Intravitreal Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injection.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the rate and risk factors for reactivation of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) after intravitreal injection (IVI) of antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents. STUDY DESIGN: Infants who received IVI therapy between 2017 and 2022 were enrolled and divided into 2 groups: those with and without ROP reactivation. Information on ROP variables and patient variables were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 114 infants with 223 eyes were enrolled in the study. The ROP reactivation rate was 11.4% of infants (9.9% of eyes). The mean duration of reactivation was 84 ± 45 days. Among the 223 eyes treated with IVI, reactivation rates were 6% for bevacizumab, 13.9% for aflibercept, and 22.2% for ranibizumab. A multivariable regression model showed that ranibizumab was an independent risk factor (OR 11.4, P = .008) for reactivation. Other risk factors included infants with periventricular leukomalacia (OR 13.8, P = .003), patent ductus arteriosus ligation (OR 10.7, P = .032), and infants who still required invasive mechanical ventilation on the day of IVI therapy (OR 7.0, P = .018). CONCLUSIONS: All anti-VEGF agents carry a risk of ROP reactivation, with the risk being greater with ranibizumab 0.25 mg than with bevacizumab 0.625 mg. Reactivation of ROP should be assessed vigilantly, especially in those infants with increased risks. Future research to determine the optimal anti-VEGF selection and dosage in high-risk infants is warranted.

Review of real-world evidence of dual inhibition of VEGF-A and ANG-2 with faricimab in NAMD and DME.

Management of vitreoretinal disorders (e.g., neovascular age-related macular degeneration [nAMD] and diabetic macular edema [DME]) have assumed the standard therapy of lifelong anti-VEGF injections with drugs like aflibercept, brolucizumab, ranibizumab and bevacizumab. However, the burden imposed on patients is a major deterrent for continual therapy and recovery. Faricimab, a bispecific antibody, blocking both VEGF-A and Ang-2 molecules, produces a comparable functional and anatomical results, with less injections, significantly reducing patient burden. Visual acuity, safety, adverse effects, and anatomical outcomes are discussed in the pivotal clinical trials (YOSEMITE/RHINE and TENAYA/LUCERNE), and early data from real-world studies (TRUCKEE, TAHOE, FARWIDE-DME, FARETINA and others). In YOSEMITE and RHINE, faricimab demonstrated non-inferior vision gains, better anatomical outcomes compared to aflibercept every 8 weeks. Faricimab in the personalized treatment interval (PTI), after week 96, achieved 12-week interval in 78.1% of the patients and 16-week interval in 62.3%. TENAYA and LUCERNE reported comparable best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improvement and better anatomic outcomes during head-to-head phase, parallel to aflibercept, at its 8-week treatment schedule. Faricimab in the PTI regimen, after week 96 achieved 12-week interval in 77.8% of the patients and 16-week interval in 63.1%. Safety of faricimab has been comparable to aflibercept in these pivotal trials. Real-world data supports the data from the pivotal studies regarding the efficacy and safety profile of faricimab in heterogenous real world patient population. Moreover, in previously treated patients, it also demonstrated a faster fluid resolution, good safety profile. Considering faricimab has demonstrated anatomic and durability benefit in the treatment of nAMD and DME, additional data from ongoing extension clinical trials, AVONELLE-X and RHONE-X will help understand longer term outcomes for patients treated with faricimab as well as patients switching from aflibercept to faricimab after finishing the pivotal trials. Longer term data from the real-world studies will also continue to contribute to our understanding of long-term efficacy, safety and durability in the real world patient population.

Bacterial endophthalmitis following anti-VEGF intravitreal injections: a retrospective case series.

BACKGROUND: To describe the incidence of endophthalmitis and the treatment outcomes of acute bacterial endophthalmitis following intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections in a Brazilian hospital. The analysis was based on the timing of infection after intravitreal injection, culture results, visual acuity, and the presence of epiretinal membrane after a 1-year follow-up period, spanning nine years. METHODS: This retrospective case series, conducted over a 9-year period, aimed to evaluate the treatment outcomes of acute endophthalmitis following intravitreal Bevacizumab injections. The inclusion criteria involved a chart review of 25 patients who presented clinical signs of acute endophthalmitis out of a total of 12,441 injections administered between January 2011 and December 2019. Negative culture results of vitreous samples or incomplete data were excluded. Ultimately, 23 patients were enrolled in the study. Eight patients were treated with intravitreal antibiotic injections (IVAI) using vancomycin 1.0 mg/0.05mL and ceftazidime 2.25 mg/0.05mL, while 15 patients underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) followed by intravitreal antibiotic injections at the end of surgery (IVAIES). The main outcome measures were the efficacy of controlling the infection with IVAI as a standalone therapy compared to early PPV followed by IVAIES. Data collected included pre-infection and one-year post-treatment best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), optical coherence tomography (OCT) abnormalities, and enucleation/evisceration rates. To compare groups, Mann-Whitney and ANOVA tests were employed for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The incidence rate of bacterial endophthalmitis was 0.185% (1/541 anti-VEGF injections), with the highest infection rates observed in 2014 and 2017. Patients presented clinical symptoms between 2 and 7 days after injection. The most common isolated organisms were coagulase-negative Staphylococci and Streptococci spp. Treatment outcomes showed that both IVAI and PPV + IVAIES effectively controlled the infection and prevented globe atrophy. After one year, the PPV group with BCVA better than Light Perception had a significantly better BCVA compared to the IVAI group (p 0.003). However, PPV group had higher incidence of epiretinal membranes formation compared to the IVAI group. (P 0.035) CONCLUSION: Anti-VEGF injections carry a risk of developing acute bacterial endophthalmitis. Isolated antibiotic therapy could be an effective treatment to control the infection, but performing PPV + IVAIES as a primary treatment showed promising results in terms of improving BCVA after one year, despite a higher rate of epiretinal membrane formation. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Determining the Superiority of Vitrectomy vs Aflibercept for Treating Dense Diabetic Vitreous Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

This review aimed to systematically compare the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) and vitrectomy for treating severe vitreous hemorrhage (VH) secondary to proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). The review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A search strategy, including the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and US National Library of Medicine databases, was developed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared vitrectomy and IVA for managing VH due to PDR (participant age ≥ 18 years). The primary outcome measure was the difference in the mean visual acuity between the two treatment groups at 1, 6, and 24 months. Outcome measures included clearance of VH (in weeks), the incidence of recurrent VH, and the rate of complications. The studies were evaluated using the Cochrane Bias (ROB) tool. We identified 774 articles; six articles met the inclusion criteria, and two were ultimately included (n = 239 eyes). With or without PRP, IVA injections and vitrectomy were performed in 117 and 122 eyes, respectively. The mean BCVA at one month was significantly better in the vitrectomy group (MD=0.22, CI:0.10-0.34, p=0.0003), but no difference was found at six months (MD=0.04, CI: -0.04-0.12, p=0.356). The incidence of recurrent VH was significantly higher in the IVA group (OR=5.05, CI:2.71-9.42, p<0.0001). The probability of recurrent VH was five times greater in the IVA group than that in the vitrectomy group. There were no significant differences in the overall proportions of intra- or postoperative complications (OR=0.64, CI: 0.09-4.85, p=0.669). None of the studies had a low ROB in any of the seven domains. We conclude that IVA can be considered a viable treatment modality for diabetic VH in patients with a good follow-up. Vitrectomy initially provides better visual effect, faster VH recovery, and lower VH recurrence than IVA injections.

Phase II Randomized Trial of Carboplatin, Pemetrexed, and Bevacizumab With and Without Atezolizumab in Stage IV Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Who Harbor a Sensitizing EGFR Mutation or Have Never Smoked.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have never smoked or have tumors with mutations in EGFR generally derive minimal benefit from single-agent PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors. Prior data indicate that adding PD-L1 inhibition to anti-VEGF and cytotoxic chemotherapy may be a promising approach to overcoming immunotherapy resistance in these patients, however prospective validation is needed. This trial in progress (NCT03786692) is evaluating patients with stage IV NSCLC who have never smoked or who have tumors with sensitizing EGFR alterations to determine if a 4-drug combination of atezolizumab, carboplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab can improve outcomes compared to carboplatin, pemetrexed and bevacizumab without atezolizumab. METHODS: This is a randomized, phase II, multicenter study evaluating carboplatin, pemetrexed, bevacizumab with and without atezolizumab in 117 patients with stage IV nonsquamous NSCLC. Randomization is 2 to 1 favoring the atezolizumab containing arm. Eligible patients include: 1) those with tumors with sensitizing EGFR alterations in exons 19 or 21 or 2) patients who have never smoked and have wild-type tumors (ie, no EGFR, ALK or ROS1 alterations). Patients are defined as having never smoked if they have smoked less than 100 cigarettes in a lifetime. Patients with EGFR-mutated tumors must have disease progression or intolerance to prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), response rate, duration of response, and time to response. CONCLUSION: This phase II trial is accruing patients at U.S. sites through the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). The trial opened in August 2019 and accrual is expected to be completed in the Fall of 2024.

Accuracy, Precision, and Residual Volume of Commonly Used Syringes for Intravitreal Injections and the Impact on Intraocular Pressure.

PURPOSE: To compare accuracy, precision, and residual volume of commonly used syringes for intravitreal injections (IVIs) and to assess the intraocular pressure (IOP) rise by variations in volumes delivered. DESIGN: Experimental laboratory study. SUBJECTS: No subjects were involved in this study. METHODS: We tested 8 syringe models with 2 different needle setups, with 2 different solutions (distilled water or glycerin) and target volumes (50 and 70 µL). To obtain the delivered and residual volumes, we weighed the syringe-needle setups with scale before liquid withdrawal, with liquid, and after liquid release. We also created an experimental eye model to determine the transient rise in IOP following stepwise 10-µL increases in injection volumes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Delivered and residual volumes, IOP rise. RESULTS: We tested a total of 600 syringe-needle setups. Becton Dickinson (BD) Ultra-Fine (0.34 ± 0.28 µL), Zero Residual (1.53 ± 1.15 µL), and Zero Residual Silicone Oil-free (1.40 ± 1.16 µL) syringes showed the lowest residual volume (P < 0.001) in comparison with the others (range: 24.86 ± 1.78 µL for Injekt-F to 51.97 ± 3.37 µL for Omnifix-F). The most accurate setups were (percentage deviation from target volume): Zero Residual Silicone Oil-free (+ 0.70%), Zero Residual 0.3 ml (+ 4.49%), BD Ultra-Fine (+ 7.83%), Injekt-F (9.42%), Norm-Ject (+ 15.88%), Omnifix-F (+ 16.96%), BD Plastipak Brazil (+17.96%), and BD Plastipak Spain syringes (+ 19.41%). There was a statistically significant difference between the Zero Residual Silicone Oil-free syringe and all other syringes (P < 0.0001), except for the Zero Residual 0.3-ml syringe (P = 0.029). The coefficient of variation was low for all syringes. The modeled IOP rise ranged from 32.3 (standard deviation [SD], 1.4) mmHg for 20-µL injection volume to 76.5 (SD, 1.0) mmHg for 80-µL injection volume. For the standard 50-µL injection volume, the peak pressure was 50.7 (SD, 0.1) mmHg, and the pressure rise duration was 28 (SD, 2) minutes. CONCLUSIONS: There were significant differences in accuracy and residual volume between syringes, whereas they showed a high precision. Volume excess results in a considerable increase in IOP rise after injection. These findings may provide a relevant overview to clinicians and to both device and drug manufacturers regarding pharmacoeconomic, safety, and efficacy issues. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Retinopatía de la prematuridad agresiva posterior / Aggressive Posterior Retinopathy of Prematurity

Introducción: La retinopatía del prematuro es una enfermedad ocular provocada por una alteración en la vasculogénesis de la retina, que lleva a la pérdida parcial o total de la visión. Objetivo: Presentar el primer caso, en la provincia de Santa Clara, de retinopatía de la prematuridad agresiva posterior y el tratamiento realizado. Presentación del caso: Niña prematura con más de 5 factores de riesgo al nacer que presentó retinopatía de la prematuridad agresiva posterior y se le realizó tratamiento con bevacizumab intravítreo. Conclusiones: La evolución de la niña en un período de un 1 año resultó satisfactoria con regresión total de la enfermedad. El tratamiento establecido constituye un método alternativo con buenos resultados en algunas condiciones específicas como la retinopatía del prematuro agresiva posterior(AU)

Introduction: Retinopathy of prematurity is an ocular disease caused by an alteration in retinal vasculogenesis, leading to partial or total loss of sight. Objective: To present the first case, in the province of Santa Clara, of aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity and the treatment performed. Case presentation: Premature girl with more than 5 risk factors at birth who presented aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity and was treated with intravitreal bevacizumab. Conclusions: The evolution of the girl in a period of 1 year was satisfactory with total regression of the disease. The established treatment constitutes an alternative method with good results in some specific conditions such as aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity(AU)

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs compared to laser photocoagulation for treatment of type 1 retinopathy of prematurity. / Anti-factor del crecimiento vascular endotelial (anti-VEGF) comparado con fotocoagulación láser para el tratamiento de la retinopatía del prematuro tipo 1.

INTRODUCTION: Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a condition that affects preterm infants, being the second leading cause of childhood blindness worldwide. The most commonly used treatments are cryotherapy or laser photocoagulation, but over the last few years, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs have gradually gained more adherents, mainly in the treatment of patients with type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ET- ROP) Therefore, it is important to summarize the existing evidence to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-VEGF drugs in type 1 retinopathy of prematurity. METHODS: We searched in Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health, which is maintained by screening multiple information sources, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, among others. We extracted data from the systematic reviews, reanalyzed data of primary studies, conducted a meta-analysis and generated a summary of findings table using the GRADE approach. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We identified six systematic reviews including 15 studies overall, of which five were randomized trials. We conclude that the use of anti-VEGF compared to laser photocoagulation, probably reduces the risk of refractive errors. On the other hand, the use of anti-VEGF may result in little or no difference in the mortality at hospital discharge, lens or corneal opacity requiring surgery, and complete or partial retinal detachment, but the certainty of the evidence is low. Finally, it is not possible to clearly establish whether anti-VEGF compared with laser photocoagulation, increases the recurrence of retinopathy of prematurity, because the certainty of the existing evidence has been assessed as very low.

INTRODUCCIÓN: La retinopatía del prematuro es una patología que afecta a recién nacidos de pretérmino, siendo la segunda causa de ceguera infantil a nivel mundial. Los tratamientos más utilizados son la crioterapia o la fotocoagulación láser, pero en el último tiempo, los fármacos anti factor del crecimiento vascular endotelial (anti-VEGF) gradualmente han ganado más adeptos, principalmente en el tratamiento de pacientes con retinopatía del prematuro tipo 1 (ET-ROP). Por lo anterior, es importante realizar un resumen de la evidencia existente para evaluar la eficacia y seguridad de los fármacos anti-VEGF en retinopatía del prematuro tipo 1. MÉTODOS: Para responder esta pregunta utilizamos Epistemonikos, la mayor base de datos de revisiones sistemáticas en salud, la cual es mantenida mediante búsquedas en múltiples fuentes de información, incluyendo MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, entre otras. Extrajimos los datos desde las revisiones identificadas, analizamos los datos de los estudios primarios, realizamos un metaanálisis y preparamos una tabla de resumen de los resultados utilizando el método GRADE. RESULTADOS Y CONCLUSIONES: Identificamos seis revisiones sistemáticas que en conjunto incluyeron 15 estudios primarios, de los cuales cinco corresponden a ensayos aleatorizados. Concluimos que el uso de anti-VEGF en comparación con la fotocoagulación con láser, probablemente disminuye el riesgo de errores refractivos. Por otro lado, el uso de anti-VEGF podría resultar en poca o nula diferencia en la mortalidad al alta hospitalaria, opacidad de cristalino o córnea que requiera cirugía y desprendimiento completo o parcial de retina, pero la certeza de la evidencia es baja. Finalmente, no es posible establecer con claridad si los anti-VEGF comparados con la fotocoagulación láser aumenta la recurrencia de la retinopatía del prematuro, debido a que la certeza de la evidencia existente ha sido evaluada como muy baja.

Pachychoroid disease spectrum: review article.

PURPOSE: The aim of this article is to do a comprehensive literature review about the current understandings of the pachychoroid disease spectrum, describing its multimodal imaging analysis, pathophysiology, differential diagnosis, and current types of management. METHODS: This comprehensive literature review was performed based on a search on the PubMed database, of relevant pachychoroid published papers according to our current knowledge. DISCUSSION: The pachychoroid disease spectrum, according to some authors, includes the following: pachychoroid pigment epitheliopathy (PPE), central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC), pachychoroid neovasculopathy (PNV), polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV)/aneurysmal type 1 neovascularization (AT1), and more recently focal choroidal excavation (FCE) and peripapillary pachychoroid syndrome (PPS). Each one of these entities will be described and discussed in this article. CONCLUSION: Significant advances in multimodal imaging have enabled a better understanding of the typical choroidal changes in pachychoroid disease spectrum. The clinical knowledge and managing options about this disease significantly increased in the last years. However, it is still unclear why some eyes with typical pachychoroid disease phenotype show no evidence of RPE damage and subretinal fluid (uncomplicated pachychoroid) while others present progressive tissue damage, neovascularization, and atrophy.

Protocolo assistencial de injeções intravítreas do HCPA: edema macular diabético / HCPA's patient care protocol for intravitreal injections: diabetic macular edema

RESUMO: O edema macular diabético é uma das principais causas de baixa visual no mundo e a indicação mais frequente de injeções intravítreas no Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. O tratamento com injeção intra-vítrea de medicamentos anti-vascular endothelial growth factor, incluindo o bevacizumaberevolucionou o desfecho visual destes pacientes às custas de múltiplas aplicações mensais. Assim como em outros centros, discrepâncias entre condutas da equipe assistencial e dificuldades logísticas acabam comprometendo a efetividade do tratamento. Portanto, desenvolvemos um protocolo de tratamento para a doença embasado na literatura, estabelecendo critérios de inclusão, exclusão, regime de tratamento e seguimento do paciente. Com isto, esperamos otimizar a efetividade e assistência do paciente com edema macular diabético.

ABSTRACT: Diabetic macular edema is one of the leading causes of visual impairment worldwide and the most common indication for intravitreal injections at the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. Treatment with intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs, including bevacizumab, has revolutionized patient outcome at the expense of multiple monthly injections. As in other hospitals, discrepancies in health team conduct and logistical difficulties compromise treatment effectiveness. Therefore, we developed a literature-based treatment protocol for diabetic macular edema, in which we established criteria for patient inclusion and exclusion, treatment regimen, and patient follow-up. We expect the treatment protocol to optimize patient care effectiveness in diabetic macular edema.

Biological drug therapy for ocular angiogenesis: Anti-VEGF agents and novel strategies based on nanotechnology.

Currently, biological drug therapy for ocular angiogenesis treatment is based on the administration of anti-VEGF agents via intravitreal route. The molecules approved with this purpose for ocular use include pegaptanib, ranibizumab, and aflibercept, whereas bevacizumab is commonly off-label used in the clinical practice. The schedule dosage involves repeated intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents to achieve and maintain effective concentrations in retina and choroids, which are administrated as solutions form. In this review article, we describe the features of different anti-VEGF agents, major challenges for their ocular delivery and the nanoparticles in development as delivery system of them. In this way, several polymeric and lipid nanoparticles are explored to load anti-VEGF agents with the aim of achieving sustained drug release and thus, minimize the number of intravitreal injections required. The main challenges were focused in the loading the molecules that maintain their bioactivity after their release from nanoparticulate system, followed the evaluation of them through studies of formulation stability, pharmacokinetic, and efficacy in in vitro and in vivo models. The analysis was based on the information published in peer-reviewed published papers relevant to anti-VEGF treatments and nanoparticles developed as ocular anti-VEGF delivery system.

Fundus autofluorescence in the evaluation of diabetic macular edema treatment response.

INTRODUCTION: Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) has shown sensitivity in the detection of macular edema. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate indices formed with FAF and retinal anatomical-functional variables in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with ziv-aflibercept (ziv-AFL). METHODS: Twenty-nine eyes of 15 DME patients who received ziv-AFL intravitreal injections were included in the study. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), contrast sensitivity (CS), optical coherence tomography (OCT) and FAF were evaluated before treatment and at one and two months. OCT variables were central subfield thickness (CST), macular volume (MV) and macular cube average thickness (MCAT). FAF/BCVA, FAF/CS, FAF/CST, FAF/MV and AF/MCAT indices baseline values were obtained. Analysis was performed with Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and linear regression analysis. RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between baseline FAF/BCVA index and BCVA at second month (rs = - 0.78, p = 0.000), between baseline FAF/CS index and BCVA at second month (rs = -0.68, p = 0.0009) and between baseline FAF/CS index and MV at first month of follow-up (rs = 0.64, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In DME, composite indices with baseline FAF predict variables such as BCVA in the follow-up of patients receiving ziv-AFL.

INTRODUCCIÓN: La autofluorescencia retiniana (AF) ha mostrado sensibilidad en la detección del edema macular. OBJETIVOS: Evaluar índices formados con la AF y variables anatomofuncionales retinianas en pacientes con edema macular diabético (EMD) tratados con ziv-aflibercept (ziv-AFL). MÉTODOS: Fueron incluidos 29 ojos de 15 pacientes con EMD que recibieron inyecciones intravítreas de ziv-AFL. Se evaluó agudeza visual mejor corregida (AVMC), sensibilidad al contraste (SC), tomografía de coherencia óptica (TCO) y AF, antes del tratamiento, así como al primer y segundo mes de iniciado este. Las variables de la TCO fueron grosor foveal central (GFC), volumen macular (VM) y grosor promedio macular (GPM). Se obtuvieron los valores basales de AF/AVMC, AF/SC, AF/GFC, AF/VM y AF/GPM. Se realizó análisis con el coeficiente de correlación de rangos de Spearman y análisis de regresión lineal. RESULTADOS: Hubo una correlación significativa entre el índice AF/AVMC basal y la AVMC en el segundo mes (rs = −0.78, p = 0.000), entre el índice AF/SC basal y la AVMC en el segundo mes (rs = −0.68, p = 0.0009) y entre AF/SC basal y el VM en el primer mes de seguimiento (rs = 0.64, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONES: En el EMD, los índices compuestos con AF basales predicen variables como AVMC en el seguimiento de pacientes que reciben ziv-AFL.

Treating corneal neovascularization using a combination of anti-VEGF injection and argon laser photocoagulation application - case report.

The present study aimed to demonstrate the possibility to treat corneal neovascularization using the combination of anti-VEGF injection and argon laser photocoagulation.

Protocolo assistencial de injeções intravítreas do HCPA: degeneração macular relacionada com a idade na forma neovascular / Intravitreal injections for age-related macular degeneration: an HCPA care protocol

A degeneração macular relacionada com a idade na forma neovascular é uma das principais causas de cegueira no mundo e a segunda indicação mais frequente de injeções intravítreas no Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. O tratamento com injeção intra-vítrea de medicamentos supressores do fator de crescimento endotelial (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor, anti-VEGF), incluindo o bevacizumabe, revolucionou o desfecho visual destes pacientes às custas de múltiplas aplicações mensais. Assim como em outros centros, discrepâncias entre condutas da equipe assistencial e dificuldades logísticas acabam comprometendo a efetividade do tratamento. Portanto, desenvolvemos um protocolo de tratamento para a DMRI-n embasado na literatura, estabelecendo critérios de inclusão, exclusão, regime de tratamento e seguimento do paciente. Com isto, esperamos otimizar a efetividade e assistência do paciente com DMRI-n. (AU)

Age-related macular degeneration in the neovascular form is one of the main causes of blindness in the world and the second most frequent indication of intravitreal injections at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. Treatment with intravitreal injection of antivascular endothelial growth factor agents, including bevacizumab, revolutionized the visual outcome of these patients at the expense of multiple monthly applications. As in other centers, discrepancies in care team's approaches and logistical difficulties compromise the effectiveness of treatment. Therefore, we developed a treatment protocol for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) based on the literature, establishing criteria for inclusion, exclusion, treatment regimen and patient follow-up. We hope to optimize the effectiveness of treatment in patients with nAMD. (AU)

Survey of Intravitreal Injection Techniques Among Retina Specialists in Mexico.

PURPOSE: To report technique preferences for intravitreal injections among retina specialists in Mexico. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey. Ophthalmologists with a two-year retina training, active members of the Mexican Retina Association, were contacted through email to answer a survey consisting of 37 items regarding their IVI application technique. RESULTS: A total of 133 retina specialists participated, with a response rate of 78%. Forty-five percent applied the intravitreal injections in an operating room designated for the procedure. Sixty-three percent reported never injecting both eyes on the same day. Ninety-six percent wore a face mask during the procedure and 91% wore gloves. Eighty-two percent used a lid speculum. Tetracaine drops were the anesthetic method employed by 97% of participants. All participants utilized povidone-iodine for antisepsis. Eighty percent measured the puncture site with a caliper. Superotemporal quadrant was the one chosen to place the injection by 63% of participants. Fifty-nine percent indicated post-injection antibiotic drops for several days. Post-injection counting fingers visual acuity was verified by 53% of the participants. Fifty-six percent of the participants placed an eye-patch after the procedure. CONCLUSION: There are different practices regarding the application of intravitreal injections among retina specialists in Mexico. Performing this type of survey periodically could show changes in preferences, as new evidence is incorporated into clinical practice.

Safety and clinical effectiveness of intravitreal administration of bevacizumab (Lumiere®) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

The present study was an open-label, prospective, uncontrolled and multicenter clinical trial to investigate the safety and effectiveness of bevacizumab (Lumiere®) administered by the intravitreal route for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). A total of 22 patients without previous treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor were recruited. Monthly therapy with 1.25 mg intravitreal bevacizumab was applied. Adverse events (AE), visual acuity (VA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were assessed at baseline, day 1 and day 28 after each injection. A total of 87 AEs were reported; most of them were not serious (96.6%), expected (65.5%) and occurred after the third injection (56.3%). The most frequent AE was 'conjunctival hemorrhage' (29.9% of AEs), attributed to the injection procedure. Treatment was not suspended due to safety reasons in any case. After six months, a statistically significant gain of +8.2 (SD±8.8) letters and a CRT reduction of -75.50 µm (SD±120.3) were achieved with unilateral therapy. VA improvement and CRT reduction were also achieved with bilateral therapy, although to a lesser extent. The results of the present study suggested that therapy with a minimum of 3 doses of bevacizumab over a 6-month period was well tolerated and resulted in a sustained response regarding VA improvement and CRT reduction from the beginning of therapy compared with the baseline value. The study protocol was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (ref. no. NCT03668054).

Cost-minimization Analysis of Ranibizumab versus Aflibercept in the Treatment of Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration in Colombia.

BACKGROUND: In 2020 Colombia may expect to have close to 231,700 patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (ARMD). Treatment of neovascular ARMD involves the sequential Intra-vitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF therapy) medications. The efficacy and safety of anti-VEGF therapy on a treat-and-extend (T&E) dosing scheme are similar when ranibizumab or aflibercept are administered. Objective : A cost-minimization analysis from the payer`s perspective in Colombia projects treatment expenses of anti-VEGF therapy using aflibercept or ranibizumab on T&E regimens for the treatment of neovascular ARMD. Methods : A model projects the expenses of the compared treatment regimens for two and five-year periods beginning on February 2020. The model used information from clinical trials, case series and meta-analyses on the compared treatment regimens, demographic, epidemiologic and economic data originated from the Colombian government sources. A 3% discount rate was applied. Results : Projected cost differences in favor of ranibizumab after two and five-year treatment periods beginning February 2020 could be close to U.S. $ 4,861 and U.S $ 7,241 per treated eye, respectively. If all patients with unilateral and bilateral neovascular ARMD in Colombia were to receive appropriate anti-VEGF therapy for two years, the projected expected cost difference in favor of ranibizumab could be close to U.S. $ 462,717,092 dollars. Conclusion : Within the Colombian healthcare setting anti-VEGF therapy on a T&E regimen utilizing ranibizumab for neovascular ARMD may be cost-saving compared with employing aflibercept. Despite cost favorability, ranibizumab should not be the only therapeutic option since in clinical practice alternatives are required.

Diabetic macular edema: a literature review

Diabetic Macular Edema is a major cause of visual impairment in economically active population, being responsible for a significant impact in quality of life in the affected population, as well as high costs to the health care system. Over decades, some studies have compared treatments using Laser, Anti-VEGF and intravitreous corticosteroids, establishing protocols to reach effectives therapies. Thus, it is essential an entire understanding of available therapies to reach the goal of disease control, in an individual basis and in a collective health care system, as efficient as possible.