Caracterización de pacientes con trombosis portal sobre hígado no cirrótico en un hospital universitario de Medellín, Colombia / Characterization of patients with portal vein thrombosis on non-cirrhotic liver at a university hospital in Medellín, Colombia

Introducción. La trombosis de la vena porta es la oclusión parcial o completa de la luz de la vena porta o sus afluentes por la formación de trombos. Se asocia a desenlaces adversos y a un peor pronóstico. La frecuencia de aparición viene en aumento, a menudo de manera incidental, debido al uso cada vez mayor de imágenes diagnósticas. Metodología. Estudio observacional de una serie de casos de pacientes mayores de 18 años a quienes se les documentó trombosis venosa portal en hígado no cirrótico en el periodo comprendido entre enero de 2012 y diciembre de 2019 en un hospital de cuarto nivel de la ciudad de Medellín, Colombia. Resultados. Se documentaron 94 trombosis portales, la media de edad fue 44 ± 15 años, el 56 % eran mujeres. El promedio de aparición de síntomas fue de 14 días. La presentación de la trombosis fue aguda en un 41 %, crónica en 44 % y de instauración aguda sobre una trombosis crónica en un 15 %. La presentación clínica fue asintomática en el 33 %, el dolor abdominal fue la presentación más común con el 62 %. La trombofilia adquirida de mayor ocurrencia fueron las neoplasias mieloproliferativas crónicas en un 18 %, seguida del síndrome antifosfolípido en un 6 %. El método diagnóstico más usado fue la TAC trifásica en un 58 % seguido de la ultrasonografía en un 35 %. El 66 % de los pacientes fueron anticoagulados, siendo la warfarina el principal anticoagulante usado en un 56 %. El 16 % presento algún tipo de sangrado, aunque ninguno fue sangrado mayor. Conclusiones. La trombosis portal sigue siendo en muchos casos un hallazgo incidental. Se encontró un número inusual de neoplasias mieloproliferativas crónicas. La anticoagulación es segura y eficaz, aunque los anticoagulantes orales directos aún tienen un uso restringido.

Introduction. Portal vein thrombosis is the partial or complete occlusion of the lumen of the portal vein or its tributaries by thrombus formation. It is associated with adverse outcomes and a poorer prognosis. Its frequency is increasing, often incidentally, due to the growing use of diagnostic imaging. Methodology. This is an observational study of a case series of patients over 18 years old who were documented with portal vein thrombosis in a non-cirrhotic liver between January 2012 and December 2019 in a fourth-level hospital in the city of Medellín, Colombia. Results. Ninety-four cases of portal vein thrombosis were documented. The mean age was 44 ± 15 years, and 56 % were women. The average onset of symptoms was 14 days. Thrombosis presentation was acute in 41 %, chronic in 44 %, and acute on chronic in 15 %. Clinically, 33 % were asymptomatic, and abdominal pain was the most common presentation at 62 %. The most common acquired thrombophilia was chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms at 18 %, followed by antiphospholipid syndrome at 6 %. The most used diagnostic method was triphasic CT at 58 %, followed by ultrasonography at 35 %. Sixty-six percent of the patients received anticoagulation, with warfarin being the main anticoagulant used at 56 %. Sixteen percent experienced some type of bleeding, although none were major. Conclusions. Portal vein thrombosis remains, in many cases, an incidental finding. An unusual number of chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms were found. Anticoagulation is safe and effective, although the use of direct oral anticoagulants remains restricted.

Effect of Screening for Undiagnosed Atrial Fibrillation on Stroke Prevention.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) often remains undiagnosed, and it independently raises the risk of ischemic stroke, which is largely reversible by oral anticoagulation. Although randomized trials using longer term screening approaches increase identification of AF, no studies have established that AF screening lowers stroke rates. OBJECTIVES: To address this knowledge gap, the GUARD-AF (Reducing Stroke by Screening for Undiagnosed Atrial Fibrillation in Elderly Individuals) trial screened participants in primary care practices using a 14-day continuous electrocardiographic monitor to determine whether screening for AF coupled with physician/patient decision-making to use oral anticoagulation reduces stroke and provides a net clinical benefit compared with usual care. METHODS: GUARD-AF was a prospective, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial designed to test whether screening for AF in people aged ≥70 years using a 14-day single-lead continuous electrocardiographic patch monitor could identify patients with undiagnosed AF and reduce stroke. Participants were randomized 1:1 to screening or usual care. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were hospitalization due to all-cause stroke and bleeding, respectively. Analyses used the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: Enrollment began on December 17, 2019, and involved 149 primary care sites across the United States. The COVID-19 pandemic led to premature termination of enrollment, with 11,905 participants in the intention-to-treat population. Median follow-up was 15.3 months (Q1-Q3: 13.8-17.6 months). Median age was 75 years (Q1-Q3: 72-79 years), and 56.6% were female. The risk of stroke in the screening group was 0.7% vs 0.6% in the usual care group (HR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.69-1.75). The risk of bleeding was 1.0% in the screening group vs 1.1% in the usual care group (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.60-1.26). Diagnosis of AF was 5% in the screening group and 3.3% in the usual care group, and initiation of oral anticoagulation after randomization was 4.2% and 2.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, there was no evidence that screening for AF using a 14-day continuous electrocardiographic monitor in people ≥70 years of age seen in primary care practice reduces stroke hospitalizations. Event rates were low, however, and the trial did not enroll the planned sample size.(Reducing Stroke by Screening for Undiagnosed Atrial Fibrillation in Elderly Individuals [GUARD-AF]; NCT04126486).

Classification and Management of Portal Vein Thrombosis in Cirrhotic Patients: A Narrative Review.

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) poses significant therapeutic challenges due to its complex pathophysiology and diverse clinical presentations. Recent advancements have spurred the development of new therapeutic approaches to enhance treatment efficacy and safety. This review synthesized emerging therapies for PVT based on a comprehensive literature search across major databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, among others, focusing on studies published in the last decade. Anticoagulation therapy, particularly with novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), emerged as beneficial in personalized treatment regimens. Innovative surgical techniques and improved risk stratification methods were identified as crucial in the perioperative management of PVT. Additionally, advances in cell therapy and medical treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma in the context of PVT were explored. Promising outcomes were observed with modalities such as Yttrium 90 and liver transplantation combined with thrombectomy, particularly in complex PVT cases associated with hepatocellular carcinoma, albeit on a limited scale. The reviewed literature indicates a shift towards individualized treatment approaches for PVT, integrating novel anticoagulants, refined risk assessment tools, and tailored interventional strategies. While these emerging therapies show potential for enhanced efficacy and safety, further research is essential to validate findings across broader patient populations and establish standardized treatment protocols.

Vascular Consequences: A Case Report on Posterior Circulation Infarction as a Sequela of COVID-19.

This case report presents a posterior circulation infarction in a previously healthy 39-year-old male, three months post-severe COVID-19. He presented with right-sided homonymous hemianopia and elevated inflammatory markers and D-dimer levels. Imaging revealed an acute left occipital infarct. Such post-COVID-19 posterior circulation strokes are rare. This report discusses the pathophysiology, optimal anticoagulation therapy for COVID-19-related thrombotic complications, and early predictor models. This case underscores the need to recognize thromboembolic events as potential late sequelae in severe COVID-19 cases.

Apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban but not dabigatran are associated with higher mortality compared to vitamin-K antagonists: A retrospective German claims data analysis.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs) have widely been replaced by non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs). This includes Austria, Germany and Switzerland, where as VKA, instead of warfarin, the much longer-acting phenprocoumon is used, which was not compared to NOACs in clinical trials. METHODS: Using administrative data from a large German health insurance, we included all anticoagulation-naïve patients with a first prescription of a NOAC or VKA between 2012 and 2020. We analysed overall survival, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, major thromboembolic events and major bleeding. RESULTS: Overall, 570,137 patients were included (apixaban: 26.9%, dabigatran: 4.6%, edoxaban: 8.8%, rivaroxaban: 39.1% and VKA: 20.7% of these 99.4% phenprocoumon). In the primary analysis using a 1:1 propensity score matching-cohort (PSM-cohort), a significantly higher overall mortality was found for apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban (all p < 0.001) but not for dabigatran (p = 0.13) compared to VKA. In this PSM-cohort, 5-year mortality was 22.7% for apixaban versus 12.7% for VKA, 19.5% for edoxaban versus 11.4% for VKA, 16.0% for rivaroxaban versus 12.3% for VKA (all p < 0.001) and 13.0% for dabigatran versus 12.8% for VKA (p = 0.06). The observed effect was confirmed in sensitivity analyses using un-weighted and three different weighted Fine-Gray regression models on the basis of the entire cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In this large real-world analysis, apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban, but not dabigatran, were associated with worse survival compared to VKA. These findings, consistent with a few other studies including phenprocoumon, cast profound doubts on the unreflected, general use of NOACs. Randomized trials should assess whether phenprocoumon might actually be superior to NOACs.

Anticoagulation in device-detected atrial fibrillation with or without vascular disease: a combined analysis of the NOAH-AFNET 6 and ARTESiA trials.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The optimal antithrombotic therapy in patients with device-detected atrial fibrillation (DDAF) is unknown. Concomitant vascular disease can modify the benefits and risks of anticoagulation. METHODS: These pre-specified analyses of the NOAH-AFNET 6 (n=2534 patients) and ARTESiA (n=4012 patients) trials compared anticoagulation to no anticoagulation in patients with DDAF with or without vascular disease, defined as prior stroke/transient ischemic attack, coronary or peripheral artery disease. Efficacy outcomes were the primary outcomes of both trials, a composite of stroke, systemic arterial embolism (SE), myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism or cardiovascular death, and stroke or SE. Safety outcomes were major bleeding or major bleeding and death. RESULTS: In patients with vascular disease (NOAH-AFNET 6 56%, ARTESiA 46.0%), stroke, myocardial infarction, systemic or pulmonary embolism, or cardiovascular death occurred at 3.9%/patient-year with and 5.0%/patient-year without anticoagulation (NOAH-AFNET 6), and 3.2%/patient-year with and 4.4%/patient-year without anticoagulation (ARTESiA). Without vascular disease, outcomes were equal with and without anticoagulation (NOAH-AFNET 6 2.7%/patient-year, ARTESiA 2.3%/patient-year in both randomised groups). Meta-analysis found consistent results across both trials (I2heterogeneity=6%) with a trend for interaction with randomised therapy (pinteraction=0.08). Stroke/SE behaved similarly. Anticoagulation increased major bleeding in vascular disease patients (edoxaban 2.1%/patient-year, no anticoagulation 1.3%/patient-year; apixaban 1.7%/patient-year; no anticoagulation 1.1%/patient-year; incidence rate ratio 1.55 [1.10-2.20]) and without vascular disease (edoxaban 2.2%/patient-year; no anticoagulation 0.6%/patient-year; apixaban 1.4%/patient-year; no anticoagulation 1.1%/patient-year, incidence rate ratio 1.93 [0.72-5.20]). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with DDAF and vascular disease are at higher risk of stroke and cardiovascular events and may derive a greater benefit from anticoagulation than patients with DDAF without vascular disease.

Bridging With Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Versus Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Comprehensive Review.

BACKGROUND: This review article discussed the use of bridging therapy with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in patients who undergo noncardiac surgery (NCS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). HYPOTHESES: Patients who undergo PCI are at an increased risk of thrombotic events due to their underlying cardiovascular disease. However, many of these patients may require NCS at some point in their lives, which poses a significant challenge for clinicians as they balance the risk of thrombotic events against the risk of bleeding associated with antithrombotic therapy. RESULTS: This review evaluates the current evidence on the use of bridging therapy with LMWH in patients undergoing NCS after PCI, focusing on outcomes related to the efficacy and safety of antithrombotic therapy. The article also discusses the limitations of the current evidence and highlights areas where further research is needed to optimize the management of antithrombotic therapy in this patient population. CONCLUSION: The goal of this review was to provide clinicians with a comprehensive summary of the available evidence to guide clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes.

Exploring stakeholder perceptions of implementing a pharmacist-led anticoagulation clinic in primary care settings: a cross-sectional study.

Background: Anticoagulation therapy is crucial for managing various cardiovascular and thrombotic conditions; however, optimal delivery remains challenging in primary care. Pharmacist-led anticoagulation services have emerged as a potential strategy for enhancing patient care and outcomes in such settings. Understanding the perspectives of key stakeholders is critical for successful implementation. Objectives: This study aimed to explore the perceptions of key stakeholders involved in the implementation of pharmacist-led anticoagulation clinics in primary care settings. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using structured, pilot-tested questionnaires between August and October 2023. Patients receiving warfarin, pharmacists, and physicians working across various primary healthcare centres were invited to complete an online survey. Each group of stakeholders had individualised questionnaires to assess their perceptions and expectations with regard to developing pharmacist-led anticoagulation clinics in primary care. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. Results: The response rates for the survey were 29.4% for physicians, 10.4% for patients, and 48.6% for pharmacists. Participants expressed positive perceptions toward pharmacist-led anticoagulation clinics, acknowledging benefits such as improved access to care, enhanced medication management, and increased patient education. The respondents expressed confidence in the expertise and skills of pharmacists in this role. However, healthcare providers strongly agree that pharmacists should receive additional training specific to anticoagulation management. Establishing standardised protocols and fostering interprofessional collaboration were identified as the main facilitators for practical implementation. Conclusions: Broad support exists for pharmacist-led anticoagulation clinics in primary care, though additional pharmacist training and accountability concerns need to be addressed for successful implementation.

Effects of atrial fibrillation screening according to thyroid function: Post-hoc analysis of the randomized LOOP study.

PURPOSE: Subclinical thyroid dysfunction is a marker for atrial fibrillation (AF) and stroke risk. This study explored the effects of AF screening according to thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels. METHODS: An AF screening trial (the LOOP study) was analyzed post-hoc according to baseline TSH. The primary outcome was stroke or systemic embolism (SE). Secondary outcomes included major bleeding, all-cause death, and the combination of stroke, SE, and cardiovascular death. RESULTS: TSH measurement was available in 6003 of 6004 trial participants, 1500 randomized to implantable loop recorder (ILR) screening for AF and anticoagulation upon detection vs. 4503 to usual care; mean age was 74.7±4.1 years and 2836 (47%) were women. AF detection was approximately triple for ILR vs usual care across TSH tertiles (adjusted p-interaction=0.44). In the first tertile, screening was associated with decreased risk of the primary outcome (hazard ratio 0.52 [0.30-0.90]; p=0.02) and stroke, SE, or cardiovascular death (hazard ratio 0.54 [0.34-0.84]; p=0.006) compared to usual care, while no effect was observed among participants with higher TSH (adjusted p-interaction 0.03 and 0.01, respectively). There was no effect on other outcomes. Analyses of continuous TSH or excluding those with abnormal TSH or thyroid medication showed similar results. CONCLUSION: AF screening and subsequent treatment was associated with decreased stroke risk among participants with low TSH, though the yield of screening was similar across TSH levels. TSH may be useful as a marker to indicate benefit from AF screening vs. overdiagnosis and overtreatment. These findings should be considered exploratory and warrant further study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT0203645.

A systematic review of the timing of therapeutic anticoagulation in adult patients with acute traumatic brain injury: narrative synthesis of observational studies.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) presents complex management scenarios, particularly in patients requiring anticoagulation for concurrent conditions such as venous thromboembolism (VTE) or atrial fibrillation (AF). A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases was conducted to identify relevant studies. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies assessing the effects of anticoagulation therapy on outcomes such as re-hemorrhage, hematoma expansion, thrombotic events, and hemorrhagic events in TBI patients with subdural hematomas (SDH). This systematic review critically addresses two key questions: the optimal timing for initiating anticoagulation therapy and the differential impact of this timing based on the type of intracranial bleed, with a specific focus on subdural hematomas (SDH) compared to other types. Initially screening 508 articles, 7 studies met inclusion criteria, which varied in design and quality, precluding meta-analysis. The review highlights a significant knowledge gap, underscoring the lack of consensus on when to initiate anticoagulation therapy in TBI patients, exacerbated by the need for anticoagulation in the presence of VTE or AF. Early anticoagulation, particularly in patients with SDH, may elevate the risk of re-hemorrhage, posing a clinical dilemma. Evidence on whether the type of intracranial hemorrhage influences outcomes with early anticoagulation remains inconclusive, indicating a need for further research to tailor management strategies effectively. This review underscores the scarcity of high-quality evidence regarding anticoagulation therapy in TBI patients with concurrent conditions, emphasizing the necessity for well-designed prospective studies to elucidate optimal management strategies for this complex patient population.

Bariatric surgery in patients with preoperative therapeutic anticoagulation: a 2015-2021 MBSAQIP database study.

BACKGROUND: The link between obesity and adverse cardiovascular events is well-established. With the rising prevalence of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), a greater number of patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) may present with preoperative therapeutic anticoagulation (AC). OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated perioperative outcomes of SG and RYGB in patients on preoperative AC. SETTING: Patients reported to the 2015-2021 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database. METHODS: Adults undergoing primary SG or RYGB with and without preoperative anticoagulation (SG-AC or RYGB-AC and non-SG-AC or non-RYGB-AC, respectively) were analyzed from the 2015-2021 MBSAQIP database. Differences in baseline characteristics by AC status for each MBS were adjusted using entropy-balanced weights. Multivariable logistic and linear regressions were developed to analyze the independent association between AC and outcomes of interest. RESULTS: Of 1,178,090 patients included, 72.0% (n = 850,682) had SG and 28.0% (n = 327,408) had RYGB, of which 1.8% (n = 15,021) and 1.9% (n = 6201) had AC, respectively. Compared to non-SG-AC and non-RYGB-AC, both SG-AC and RYGB-AC encountered higher absolute 30-day rates of anastomotic leak, deep vein thrombosis and gastrointestinal bleeding. Following multivariable adjustment, SG-AC was associated with significantly greater odds of adverse cardiovascular events, anastomotic leak, gastrointestinal bleeding, and greater operative length and length of stay. RYGB-AC was associated with higher odds of readmission, unplanned ICU admission, and ED visit. CONCLUSIONS: While preoperative AC may confer distinct outcomes between SG and RYGB, this 7-year study of MBSAQIP demonstrated an overall association with greater postoperative morbidity. Management of MBS patients with preoperative AC requires consideration of thrombohemorrhagic risks.

Rate of recurrence after discontinuing anticoagulation in patients with venous thromboembolism within 30 days after COVID-19 vaccine.

This study generated evidence to guide anticoagulation in patients with VTE after vaccination for COVID-19. We provided data on the low recurrence rate after cessation of anticoagulant therapy and the findings for this study offer timely insights into the management of a potentially vaccine-related adverse event.

Challenges in diagnosis and management of aortobronchial fistula: a case report.

Background: Aortobronchial fistulas (ABFs) are rare but potentially life-threatening conditions, often presenting with haemoptysis. They can develop following various thoracic aortic conditions or procedures. Case Presentation: A 70-year-old patient with a history of descending aorta replacement and ischaemic stroke presented with chest pain and upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Imaging revealed a fistula between the aortic prosthesis and the lung, along with other cardiovascular abnormalities. Despite the indication for anticoagulant therapy, tranexamic acid was initiated due to bleeding risk. The patient showed clinical improvement with tranexamic acid treatment but experienced recurrence of bleeding after discontinuation. Endovascular treatment for the contained rupture at the proximal stent anastomosis was indicated. Discussion: Haemoptysis is the primary symptom of ABFs, often recurring until the fistula enlarges. Postoperative aortic fistulas into the airways are uncommon and can occur years after surgery. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair has become the primary treatment for high-risk patients with thoracic aortic disease. Various diagnostic modalities can visualize a fistula tract, but practical visualization is rare. Untreated ABFs invariably lead to death. Conclusion: This case highlights the challenges in diagnosing and managing ABFs, emphasizing the need for a multidisciplinary approach and regular follow-up. Patient education and prompt reporting of symptoms are essential. Early intervention upon suspicion of recurrence is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.

Current Antithrombotic Treatments for Cardiovascular Diseases: A Comprehensive Review.

Antithrombotic therapies (ATT) play a pivotal role in the management of cardiovascular diseases, aiming to prevent ischemic events while maintaining a delicate balance with the patient's bleeding risk. Typically, ATT can be classified into antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies. Their application spans a broad spectrum of cardiovascular conditions, ranging from ischemic heart disease to atrial fibrillation, encompassing venous thromboembolisms and innovative structural interventional cardiology procedures. The global burden of cardiovascular diseases is steadily increasing, often giving rise to overlapping clinical presentations. Accordingly, the adoption of combined pharmacological approaches becomes imperative, potentially disrupting the delicate equilibrium between ischemic and bleeding risk, thus leading to nuanced pharmacotherapeutic pathways. In this context, contemporary investigations strive to identify a convergence point that optimizes the duration of medical therapy while addressing the need for antithrombotic effects, especially in the context of ischemic heart disease. This review aims to comprehensively revisit the main antithrombotic strategies in cardiovascular diseases, with the intention of enhancing a systematic approach which is key for the effective clinical management of these patients. Also, the review will examine the most impactful studies that have established the groundwork for current scientific evidence, with acknowledgement of special populations. Finally, we will cast a gaze into the future of this dynamic and evolving research field, exploring forthcoming perspectives and advancements.

Atrial High-Rate Episodes and Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation: State of the Art and Clinical Questions with Complex Solutions.

Atrial high-rate episodes (AHREs) and subclinical atrial fibrillation (AF) are frequently registered in asymptomatic patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs). While an increased risk of thromboembolic events (e.g., stroke) and benefits from anticoagulation have been widely assessed in the setting of clinical AF, concerns persist about optimal clinical management of subclinical AF/AHREs. As a matter of fact, an optimal threshold of subclinical episodes' duration to predict stroke risk is still lacking and recently published randomized clinical trials assessing the impact of anticoagulation on thromboembolic events in this specific setting have shown contrasting results. The aim of this review is to summarize current evidence regarding classification and clinical impact of subclinical AF/AHREs and to discuss the latest evidence regarding the potential benefit of anticoagulation in this setting, highlighting which clinical questions are still unanswered.

The anticoagulation one year after ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with atrial fibrillation (ALONE-AF) trial: Study protocol.

Background: The ideal long-term antithrombotic strategy for patients after successful catheter-based atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is still uncertain. Presently, practices vary, and the advantages of oral anticoagulation (OAC) for the post-ablation population are not clearly established. To date, no randomized trials have addressed this therapeutic question. This study aimed to evaluate whether no OAC therapy is superior to apixaban in reducing the risk of stroke, systemic embolism, or major bleeding among patients without apparent recurrent atrial arrhythmias for at least 1 year after their AF ablation procedure. Methods: The ALONE-AF trial is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized study with blinded outcome assessment. Patients with AF who have at least one non-gender stroke risk factor (as determined by the CHA2DS2-VASc score) and no documented recurrences of atrial arrhythmia for at least 12 months post-ablation will be randomly assigned to apixaban 5 mg b.i.d. or no OAC therapy. The primary endpoint is a composite outcome of stroke, systemic embolism, and major bleeding. Key secondary outcomes include clinically relevant non-major bleeding, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attack, quality of life, and frailty analysis. Participants will be followed for a period of 2 years. The estimated total sample size is 840 subjects, with 420 subjects in each arm. Conclusion: The ALONE-AF trial aims to provide robust evidence for the optimal anticoagulation strategy for patients with stroke risk factors following successful AF ablation.

Atrial Fibrillation in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common among patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) with a prevalence greater than 25%. AF in HCM is associated with a high risk of stroke and can be a marker of more advanced cardiomyopathy. Although, it frequently results in cardiac hemodynamic changes which are poorly tolerated, it can be subclinical. Thus, prompt diagnosis and adequate management of AF are essential to minimizing AF-related adverse outcomes in HCM. All HCM patients should be screened for AF regularly, and those with high-risk features should be screened more frequently preferably with extended ambulatory monitoring. Once AF is detected, oral anticoagulation should be initiated. Both general and HCM-specific modifiable risk factors should be addressed and assessment for cardiomyopathy progression should be performed. Although no randomized controlled studies have compared rate versus rhythm control in HCM, early rhythm control could be considered to prevent further LA remodeling.

Exploring the use of electroconvulsive therapy in the anticoagulated population: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Electroconvulsive therapy is an effective treatment for several psychiatric conditions. There are theoretical risks associated with electroconvulsive therapy in patients who are anticoagulated. However, there is no review investigating these adverse effects. AIM: This systematic review explored the literature on using electroconvulsive therapy in anticoagulated patients, including adverse effects associated with continuation or cessation of anticoagulation during electroconvulsive therapy. METHODS: The study was registered on PROSPERO (registration CRD42023432178). A search was conducted across CENTRAL, Embase, Medline and PsychINFO databases, with title and abstract screening, full-text review and data extraction by two independent reviewers. Patients planned for electroconvulsive therapy and on anticoagulation prior to electroconvulsive therapy were included. Papers not related to electroconvulsive therapy or anticoagulation were excluded. Data were recorded in Microsoft Excel, presented in tables. RESULTS: The studies comprised 108 patients and over 700 sessions of electroconvulsive therapy. 64.81% patients were on warfarin, 22.22% on a direct-acting oral anticoagulant, 5.55% on heparin and the rest on enoxaparin, dalteparin, acenocoumarol or bemiparin. There were two reports of both nonfatal non-central nervous system bleeding and pulmonary embolism in patients with anticoagulation. There were no intracranial haemorrhages or deaths. Bridging or substitution with an anticoagulant with a shorter half-life had no additional benefit. CONCLUSION: This review showed tolerability of anticoagulants continued throughout electroconvulsive therapy, with most patients reporting no adverse effects. Given limitations including few studies and medical comorbidities influencing patient risk profile, further studies are required to guide practice recommendations and review long-term outcomes.

Anticoagulation in embolic acute limb ischaemia-an observational study.

The management of embolic acute limb ischaemia commonly involves determining aetiology and performing emergency invasive procedures. This detailed study aimed to determine the impact of manipulation of anticoagulation in the aetiology of emboli in acute limb ischaemia and determine the efficacy of primary anticoagulation therapy vs. invasive interventions. Material and methods: Data collection was conducted at a single institution on a cohort of patients presenting consecutively with embolic acute limb ischaemia over one year. Two groups were compared, one receiving anticoagulation as primary therapy with those undergoing invasive treatment as the internal comparison group. Results: A likely haematological causation was identified in 22 of 38 presentations, related to interruption of anticoagulation in cardiac conditions, the majority atrial fibrillation (n=12), or hypercoagulable states (n=10). Limb salvage was pursued in 36 patients employing anticoagulation (n=19) or surgical embolectomy (n=17) as the primary therapy in upper and lower limbs (n=17 vs n=19 respectively). Despite delays often well beyond six hours and a range of ischaemic severity in both groups, 35 of 36 patients achieved full or substantive restoration of function with improved perfusion. Regarding anatomical distribution of arterial disease and therapy, three patients with multi-level disease proceeded to embolectomy following anticoagulation. Embolectomy was undertaken most often for proximal emboli and more profound paralysis. Conclusions: Anticoagulation and coagulopathy are commonly implicated in the aetiology of arterial emboli, with omission of effective anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation being associated in almost 1/3 of presentations. Whilst more profound limb paralysis and proximal or multi-level disease tended to be managed surgically, primary anticoagulation therapy alone or with a secondary embolectomy was effective across the spectrum of ischaemia severity and despite significant delays beyond guideline recommendations.

Assessing ChatGPT4 with and without retrieval-augmented generation in anticoagulation management for gastrointestinal procedures.

Background: In view of the growing complexity of managing anticoagulation for patients undergoing gastrointestinal (GI) procedures, this study evaluated ChatGPT-4's ability to provide accurate medical guidance, comparing it with its prior artificial intelligence (AI) models (ChatGPT-3.5) and the retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)-supported model (ChatGPT4-RAG). Methods: Thirty-six anticoagulation-related questions, based on professional guidelines, were answered by ChatGPT-4. Nine gastroenterologists assessed these responses for accuracy and relevance. ChatGPT-4's performance was also compared to that of ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT4-RAG. Additionally, a survey was conducted to understand gastroenterologists' perceptions of ChatGPT-4. Results: ChatGPT-4's responses showed significantly better accuracy and coherence compared to ChatGPT-3.5, with 30.5% of responses fully accurate and 47.2% generally accurate. ChatGPT4-RAG demonstrated a higher ability to integrate current information, achieving 75% full accuracy. Notably, for diagnostic and therapeutic esophagogastroduodenoscopy, 51.8% of responses were fully accurate; for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with and without stent placement, 42.8% were fully accurate; and for diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy, 50% were fully accurate. Conclusions: ChatGPT4-RAG significantly advances anticoagulation management in endoscopic procedures, offering reliable and precise medical guidance. However, medicolegal considerations mean that a 75% full accuracy rate remains inadequate for independent clinical decision-making. AI may be more appropriately utilized to support and confirm clinicians' decisions, rather than replace them. Further evaluation is essential to maintain patient confidentiality and the integrity of the physician-patient relationship.