Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters











Publication year range
2.
Front Immunol ; 14: 1241038, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37575243

ABSTRACT

The SARS CoV-2 antibody and CD4+ T cell responses induced by natural infection and/or vaccination decline over time and cross-recognize other viral variants at different levels. However, there are few studies evaluating the levels and durability of the SARS CoV-2-specific antibody and CD4+ T cell response against the Mu, Gamma, and Delta variants. Here, we examined, in two ambispective cohorts of naturally-infected and/or vaccinated individuals, the titers of anti-RBD antibodies and the frequency of SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ T cells up to 6 months after the last antigen exposure. In naturally-infected individuals, the SARS-CoV-2 antibody response declined 6 months post-symptoms onset. However, the kinetic observed depended on the severity of the disease, since individuals who developed severe COVID-19 maintained the binding antibody titers. Also, there was detectable binding antibody cross-recognition for the Gamma, Mu, and Delta variants, but antibodies poorly neutralized Mu. COVID-19 vaccines induced an increase in antibody titers 15-30 days after receiving the second dose, but these levels decreased at 6 months. However, as expected, a third dose of the vaccine caused a rise in antibody titers. The dynamics of the antibody response upon vaccination depended on the previous SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Lower levels of vaccine-induced antibodies were associated with the development of breakthrough infections. Vaccination resulted in central memory spike-specific CD4+ T cell responses that cross-recognized peptides from the Gamma and Mu variants, and their duration also depended on previous SARS-CoV-2 exposure. In addition, we found cross-reactive CD4+ T cell responses in unexposed and unvaccinated individuals. These results have important implications for vaccine design for new SARS-CoV-2 variants of interest and concern.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines , Colombia/epidemiology , T-Lymphocytes , Antibodies, Viral , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes
3.
Acta neurol. colomb ; 39(2)jun. 2023.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1533491

ABSTRACT

Introducción: En Colombia, la información sobre la frecuencia de presentación de la enfermedad por CO-VID-19 y sus desenlaces en personas con esclerosis múltiple (EM) es prácticamente inexistente. El objetivo de este estudio es describir la frecuencia, las características y los factores relacionados con la infección por COVID-19 en una muestra de pacientes con EM en Colombia. Materiales y métodos: Análisis descriptivo y retrospectivo de pacientes diagnosticados con criterios de esclerosis múltiple que acudieron a nuestro centro entre junio y octubre del año 2021. Los pacientes proporcionaron información sobre la infección por SARS-CoV-2 y su vacunación. Se analizaron los factores relacionados con la infección por COVID-19 mediante modelos de regresión logística binomial uni y multivariable. Resultados: Se analizaron 240 pacientes, de los cuales el 71 % eran mujeres, con una edad promedio de 34 años. La mayoría estaban en tratamiento con terapias modificadoras de la enfermedad y más del 80 % estaban vacunados. Sesenta y nueve pacientes declararon haber tenido COVID-19. En los modelos multivariables, la edad (OR 0,96; IC 95 % 0,93-0,99) fue el único factor asociado con una menor probabilidad de infección por COVID-19. Discusión: La infección por COVID-19 en pacientes con EM en Colombia parece ser independiente de las variables clínicas y de tratamiento y parece estar asociada con la menor edad. Conclusiones: Se requieren más estudios para evaluar el comportamiento del COVID-19 en pacientes con EM en el contexto colombiano.


Introduction: The information about the frequency of COVID-19 and its outcomes in people with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in Colombia is practically non-existent. We aimed to describe the frequency characteristics and factors associated with of COVID-19 in a sample of patients with MS. Materials and methods: Descriptive and retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis criteria who attended our center between June and October 2021. Patients provided information about SARS-CoV-2 infection and their vaccination. COVID-19 determinants were analyzed using uni-and multivariable binomial logistic regression models. Results: 240 patients were analyzed, of whom 71% were women, with a mean age of 34 years. The majority of patients were on disease-modifying therapies and over 80 % were vaccinated. 69 patients reported having had COVID-19. In multivariable models, age (OR 0.96; 95 % CI 0.93-0.99) was the only factor associated with a lower odds of COVID-19 infection. Discussion: COVID-19 infection in patients with MS in Colombia appears to be independent of clinical and treatment variables, and it appears to be associated with younger age. Conclusions: More studies are needed to assess the behavior of COVID-19 in MS patients from Colombia.


Subject(s)
SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 , Multiple Sclerosis , Immunosuppression Therapy , COVID-19 Vaccines , Breakthrough Infections
4.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 11(3)2023 Feb 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36992118

ABSTRACT

SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections, associated with waning immunity, increase systemic antibody levels. In this study, we analyzed the impact of the infection timing on the magnitude of the systemic humoral response and whether breakthrough infections also boost antibody levels in the salivary compartment. We observed that the combination of infection plus vaccination, regardless of infection timing, produced a sharp increase in systemic antibodies, which were higher in subjects infected after third doses. Moreover, despite high systemic antibody levels, breakthrough infections after dose three occurred and boosted antibody levels in the salivary compartment. These results suggest that current vaccination strategies against COVID-19 should be improved. Results also showed that determination of salivary antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 could be a valuable tool in disease prevalence studies, for the follow-up of vaccinated individuals, and to assist vaccination strategies against COVID-19, especially in settings where blood sampling cannot be fulfilled.

5.
Eur J Cancer ; 160: 243-260, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34794855

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer are considered a priority group for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination given their high risk of contracting severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, limited data exist regarding the efficacy of immunisation in this population. In this study, we assess the immunologic response after COVID-19 vaccination of cancer versus non-cancer population. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science databases were searched from 01st March 2020 through 12th August 12 2021. Primary end-points were anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S) immunoglobulin G (IgG) seroconversion rates, T-cell response, and documented SARS-CoV-2 infection after COVID-19 immunisation. Data were extracted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Overall effects were pooled using random-effects models. RESULTS: This systematic review and meta-analysis included 35 original studies. Overall, 51% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41-62) and 73% (95% CI, 64-81) of patients with cancer developed anti-S IgG above the threshold level after partial and complete immunisation, respectively. Patients with haematologic malignancies had a significantly lower seroconversion rate than those with solid tumours after complete immunisation (65% vs 94%; P < 0.0001). Compared with non-cancer controls, oncological patients were less likely to attain seroconversion after incomplete (risk ratio [RR] 0.45 [95% CI 0.35-0.58]) and complete (RR 0.69 [95% CI 0.56-0.84]) COVID-19 immunisation schemes. Patients with cancer had a higher likelihood of having a documented SARS-CoV-2 infection after partial (RR 3.21; 95% CI 0.35-29.04) and complete (RR 2.04; 95% CI 0.38-11.10) immunisation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cancer have an impaired immune response to COVID-19 vaccination compared with controls. Strategies that endorse the completion of vaccination schemes are warranted. Future studies should aim to evaluate different approaches that enhance oncological patients' immune response.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/immunology , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Neoplasms/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/drug effects , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Vaccination/adverse effects , Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19/virology , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Neoplasms/chemically induced , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/virology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Seroconversion , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL