Associations of 24-Hour Central Systolic Blood Pressure With Multiorgan Damage in Nondialysis Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND: Multiple target-organ damages (TODs) in the same patient are common and further increase the risk of cardiovascular disease. However, the relationship between ambulatory central systolic blood pressure (SBP) and multiple TODs has yet to be explored. METHODS AND RESULTS: MobilO-Graph PWA was used to monitor the participants' ambulatory blood pressure, and the presence of left ventricular hypertrophy, carotid hypertrophy, and kidney injury were used to define TOD. Logistic regression analyses and receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to explore the correlation between SBP and TOD. Overall, 2018 nondialysis patients with chronic kidney disease were included and 580 (28.74%) had multiple TODs. Twenty-four-hour central SBP with c2 calibration exhibited a stronger correlation with the increasing number of TOD compared with 24-hour brachial SBP in ordinal logistic regression analyses. In the multivariable analyses with the presence of multiple TODs, the odds ratios were 1.786 (95% CI, 1.474-2.165; P<0.001) for 24-hour brachial SBP and 1.949 (95% CI, 1.605-2.366; P<0.001) for 24-hour central SBP with c2 calibration. The receiver operating characteristic analyses also showed that 24-hour central SBP with c2 calibration had higher discrimination than 24-hour brachial SBP regarding multiple TODs (P<0.001). In addition, using 130/135 mm Hg as the threshold for 24-hour brachial SBP/central SBP with c2 calibration to cross-classify, the prevalence of multiple TODs was greater in cases of concordant hypertension compared with cases of isolated brachial hypertension and concordant normotension, with no difference between the latter 2 conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-four-hour central SBP with c2 calibration was more associated with the presence of multiple TODs compared with 24-hour brachial SBP and was helpful in risk classification of multiple TODs among nondialysis patients with chronic kidney disease.

Association of cardiovascular events with central systolic blood pressure: A systemic review and meta-analysis.

Central blood pressure confers cardiovascular risk prediction ability, but whether the association between central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) and cardiovascular endpoints is independent of peripheral systolic blood pressure (pSBP) remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to investigate the associations between cSBP and cardiovascular endpoints in models including and excluding pSBP, respectively. Observational studies assessing the risk of composite cardiovascular endpoints with baseline cSBP were searched in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to May 31, 2022. Risk of bias was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale, and random-effects models were used to pool estimates. Finally, 48 200 participants from 19 studies with a mean age of 59.0 ± 6.9 years were included. Per 10 mmHg increase of cSBP was associated with higher risk of composite cardiovascular outcomes (risk ratio [RR]: 1.14 [95%CI 1.08-1.19]) and cardiovascular death (RR: 1.18 [95%CI 1.08-1.30]), and the associations still existed after adjusting for pSBP (RR: 1.13 [95%CI 1.05-1.21] for composite cardiovascular endpoints; RR: 1.25 [95%CI 1.09-1.43] for cardiovascular death). In pSBP-unadjusted studies, increased cSBP was also associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality and stroke, but not in the pSBP-adjusted studies. Both cSBP and pSBP were similarly significantly associated with composite cardiovascular endpoints in models containing them separately and simultaneously. cSBP was significantly associated with cardiovascular events, independently of pSBP. Central or peripheral SBP could supplement cardiovascular risk assessment besides each other.

Noninvasive central hemodynamic monitoring in the primary care setting: improving prevention and management of cardiovascular diseases.

Background: Although cardiovascular disease (CVD) has markedly declined since the early 1960s due to medical advances and better management, this condition persists as the most critical and preventable cause of death in the US. For that reason, the identification and application of more sensitive, specific, validated, and noninvasive biomarkers of cardiovascular functioning in the primary care setting for the early identification of CVD risk at the subclinical level are warranted. Aim: The goal of the present review is twofold: first, to familiarize the primary care practitioner with noninvasive aortic hemodynamic parameters, including how these could be integrated into primary care services and patient management, and second, to propose a model for earlier detection of CVD based on the noninvasive hemodynamic parameters in the primary care setting. Relevance for Patients: Implementation of noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in a primary care setting could help in the identification of heart disease risk at the early onset thus preventing the need for expensive treatment or death at later stages.

Factors associated with arterial stiffness assessed by pulse pressure amplification in healthy children and adolescents: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence suggests that reducing pulse pressure amplification (PPA) plays an important role in pathogenesis and progression of cardiovascular disease. This is a cross-sectional, observational, and analytical study in which we evaluated the associated factors with a greater chance of reducing PPA in 136 healthy children and adolescents aged 8 to 19 years old stratified by gender and age group. METHODS: Arterial stiffness and vascular and hemodynamic parameters were non-invasively measured using Mobil-O-Graph® (IEM, Stolberg, Germany), a cuff-based oscillometric device. PPA was expressed as the peripheral-to-central pulse pressure ratio (PPp / PPc). Participants with PPA < 1.49 were considered as part of the arterial stiffness group. RESULTS: In a univariate model, the increase in total vascular resistance, the reflection coefficient and the augmentation pressure were more likely to have arterial stiffness in all groups. The factors most likely to have arterial stiffness (as assessed by the reduction of the PPA) in the multivariate model were increasing age, the reflection coefficient and cardiac index in the total sample, male group and child and adolescent groups. In addition to age in the female group, cardiac output, stroke volume, and AIx@75 were the factors most likely to present arterial stiffness. CONCLUSIONS: The results show for the first time in children and adolescents that the factors most likely to reduce PPA are related to the reflection wave, which determines aortic pressures and, therefore, left ventricular afterload.

Markers of arterial stiffness and urinary metabolomics in young adults with early cardiovascular risk: the African-PREDICT study.

INTRODUCTION: Increased exposure to risk factors in the young and healthy contributes to arterial changes, which may be accompanied by an altered metabolism. OBJECTIVES: To increase our understanding of early metabolic alterations and how they associate with markers of arterial stiffness, we profiled urinary metabolites in young adults with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor(s) and in a control group without CVD risk factors. METHODS: We included healthy black and white women and men (N = 1202), aged 20-30 years with a detailed CVD risk factor profile, reflecting obesity, physical inactivity, smoking, excessive alcohol intake, masked hypertension, hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia and low socio-economic status, forming the CVD risk group (N = 1036) and the control group (N = 166). Markers of arterial stiffness, central systolic blood pressure (BP) and pulse wave velocity were measured. A targeted metabolomics approach was followed by measuring amino acids and acylcarnitines using a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. RESULTS: In the CVD risk group, central systolic BP (adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity) was negatively associated with histidine, arginine, asparagine, serine, glutamine, dimethylglycine, threonine, GABA, proline, methionine, pyroglutamic acid, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, branched chain amino acids (BCAAs) and butyrylcarnitine (all P ≤ 0.048). In the same group, pulse wave velocity (adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, mean arterial pressure) was negatively associated with histidine, lysine, threonine, 2-aminoadipic acid, BCAAs and aromatic amino acids (AAAs) (all P ≤ 0.044). In the control group, central systolic BP was negatively associated with pyroglutamic acid, glutamic acid and dodecanoylcarnitine (all P ≤ 0.033). CONCLUSION: In a group with increased CVD risk, markers of arterial stiffness were negatively associated with metabolites related to AAA and BCAA as well as energy metabolism and oxidative stress. Our findings may suggest that metabolic adaptations may be at play in response to increased CVD risk to maintain cardiovascular integrity.

Estimation of Central Systolic Blood Pressure from Peripheral Pressure Waves using a Novel Second Systolic Pressure-Based Method in Normal and Heritable Hypercholesterolemic Rabbits.

AIM: Central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) was closely related to hypertension-related organ damage rather than peripheral systolic blood pressure (pSBP). We aimed to estimate cSBP from pSBP without generalized transfer function in normal and Kurosawa and Kusanagi-hypercholesterolemic (KHC) rabbits aged 12 months. METHODS: Two catheter-tip transducers were advanced into the ascending aorta (AA) and distal end of the right brachial artery (Br) through the right common carotid and right radial arteries, respectively, under pentobarbital anesthesia. Pressure waves in response to the intravenous administration of angiotensin II and sodium nitroprusside were simultaneously recorded in AA and Br under regular cardiac pacing. RESULTS: The first (pSBP) and second peaks (pSBP2) of the brachial blood pressure and their average (pSBPm) were significantly correlated with cSBP, despite Murgo's wave pattern of central pressure waves in both rabbit groups. In Bland-Altman plot and its modification as a function of the peripheral augmentation index (pAI) analyses, the differences between pSBP and cSBP decreased, and those between pSBP2 and cSBP increased significantly in their average- or pAI-dependent manner, with undeniable mean biases in both rabbit groups. When the same analyses for SBPm were performed instead, the mean bias was around zero, with reduced variance in the two rabbit groups. The observed pressure or pAI-dependent systematic biases for pSBP and pSBP2 disappeared, representing the precise feature of pSBPm as a cSBP estimate. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that pSBPm could be more precise than pSBP2 as a cSBP estimate, irrespective of blood pressure levels, pAI, or the presence of atherosclerosis.

Heart Rate Recovery, Central Systolic Pressure, and Augmentation Index in Young Healthy Individuals.

PURPOSE: Measuring heart rate recovery (HRR) holds valuable cardiovascular information and requires minimal technical skill and cost. Understanding the associations between HRR and more robust cardiovascular indicators, such as central systolic blood pressure (CSBP), can provide valuable cardiovascular information with less involvement. CSBP is a strong predictor of certain cardiovascular diseases. The study aims to examine the association between measures of HRR and CSBP and the augmentation index (AIx) in a group of young, healthy individuals and based on sex. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: One-hundred and seven participants (men - 55, women - 52) were measured for HRR at one minute (HRR1) and two minutes (HRR2) after maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max) testing, CSBP, and the AIx at a heart rate of 75 beats∙min-1 (AIx@75). RESULTS: The Pearson correlation indicated no association between HRR1, HRR2, and CSBP in men and women combined: r = 0.06, P = 0.53; r = 0.05, P = 0.59, respectively, or based on sex: men = r = 0.01, P = 0.95; r = 0.04, P = 0.79, respectively, and women = r = -0.05, P = 0.75; r = -0.09, P = 0.52, respectively. However, there were associations between HRR1 and AIx@75 in men and women combined: r = -0.37, P < 0.001, and based on sex: men = r = -0.31, P = 0.02, and women = r = -0.38, P < 0.01. CONCLUSION: Measures of HRR were not associated with CSBP in a combined group of young men and women or based on sex. Most measures of HRR, especially those established by parasympathetic nervous activity, were associated with lower AIx@75. Though measures of HRR might be good indicators of cardiovascular disease, they might not be good indicators of CSBP in young, healthy individuals.

Habitual coffee and caffeinated beverages consumption is inversely associated with arterial stiffness and central and peripheral blood pressure.

The effects of chronic coffee consumption on the cardiovascular system are still under debate. Aortic stiffness, wave reflections, and central and peripheral blood pressure (BP) are milestone indicators of cardiovascular-risk. We sought to investigate the association between coffee and caffeine consumption, arterial stiffness, and central/peripheral BP. Aortic stiffness was evaluated via pulse wave velocity (PWV); wave reflections with the augmentation index (AIx);peripheral systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP), and central BP (cSBP/cDBP) were non-invasively assessed. Coffee and caffeine consumption was ascertained using a questionnaire. A linear inverse relationship between coffee and caffeine consumption and arterial stiffness and central and peripheral BP was found.Light coffee and caffeine consumers showed ß-coefficients for PWV-0.15, SBP-3.61, DBP-2.48, cSBP-3.21, and cDBP-2.18 (all p values < 0.05).Present findings suggest that coffee and caffeine consumption is inversely associated with arterial stiffness and central and peripheral BP in a large population sample. Interventional prospective studies are needed to demonstrate the causal association.

Central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) to brachial systolic blood pressure (brachSBP) ratio reproducibility during antihypertensive therapy.

OBJECTIVES: Higher CSBP than brachial SBP in individual patient increases cardiovascular (CV) risk. For follow-up it is important to assess the reproducibility of such measurements. The aim of this study was to assess the reproducibility of these differences, expressed as a CSBP/BrachSBP ratios. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eighty-three patients on antihypertensive therapy were analysed for the reproducibility of such ratios after time interval of several month up to several years. For CSBP estimation, we used the Arteriograph (Tensiomed Ltd.), based on blood pressure measurements by cuff on oscillometric principle, using pulse wave analysis (PWA) for assessment of CSBP. RESULTS: The proportion of patients retained the same characteristics (either higher central or higher peripheral SBP) between the first and second measurement was 71.1 %. The association between 1st and 2nd measurement, was statistically significant, p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: In our study, a high proportion (60 %) of treated hypertensive patients had CSBP higher than brachial SBP, which may adversely influence their prognosis. This characteristic is highly reproducible. Taking into the account these differences may increase the exactness of CV risk estimation and may contribute to explanation of residual risk of individual patient (Tab. 3, Fig. 1, Ref. 28).

Associations between remnant lipoprotein cholesterol and central systolic blood pressure in a Chinese community-based population: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The lipid profile is reportedly related to peripheral blood pressure or pulse wave velocity. However, no studies have investigated the associations between lipid parameters, especially remnant lipoprotein cholesterol (RLP-C), and central systolic blood pressure (cSBP). METHODS: This study used baseline data of a community-based cohort in Beijing, China. Participants who had been treated with anti-hypertensive or lipid-lowering agents were excluded. RLP-C is equal to total cholesterol (TC) minus the sum of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). An Omron HEM-9000AI device was used to measure non-invasive cSBP. The associations between blood lipid profile and non-invasive cSBP were evaluated using multivariable regression models. RESULTS: The 5173 included participants were 55.0 ± 8.5 years old; 35.7% (1845) of participants were men. Increased cSBP was significantly associated with increased TC, LDL-C, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), triglyceride (TG), and RLP-C but with decreased HDL-C, even after adjusting for possible covariates. When simultaneously entering individual pairs of RLP-C and other blood lipid parameters into the multivariable regression model, RLP-C remained significantly associated with cSBP, even after adjusting for other lipids. Compared with participants who had RLP-C levels in the first quartile (Q1), cSBP for those with RLP-C in Q4 was increased to 4.57 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.08-6.06) mmHg after adjusting for LDL-C, 4.50 (95%CI: 2.98-6.02) mmHg after adjusting for TC, 3.91 (95%CI: 1.92-5.89) mmHg after adjusting for TG, 5.15 (95%CI: 3.67-6.63) mmHg after adjusting for HDL-C, and 4.10 (95%CI: 2.36-5.84) mmHg after adjusting for non-HDL-C. CONCLUSIONS: Increased blood RLP-C level was significantly associated with higher cSBP in a Chinese population, independently of other lipids, which indicates its importance in individual cardiovascular risk assessment.

New Method to Estimate Central Systolic Blood Pressure From Peripheral Pressure: A Proof of Concept and Validation Study.

Objective: The non-invasive estimation of central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) is increasingly performed using new devices based on various pulse acquisition techniques and mathematical analyses. These devices are most often calibrated assuming that mean (MBP) and diastolic (DBP) BP are essentially unchanged when pressure wave travels from aorta to peripheral artery, an assumption which is evidence-based. We tested a new empirical formula for the direct central blood pressure estimation of cSBP using MBP and DBP only (DCBP = MBP2/DBP). Methods and Results: First, we performed a post-hoc analysis of our prospective invasive high-fidelity aortic pressure database (n = 139, age 49 ± 12 years, 78% men). The cSBP was 146.0 ± 31.1 mmHg. The error between aortic DCBP and cSBP was -0.9 ± 7.4 mmHg, and there was no bias across the cSBP range (82.5-204.0 mmHg). Second, we analyzed 64 patients from two studies of the literature in whom invasive high-fidelity pressures were simultaneously obtained in the aorta and brachial artery. The weighed mean error between brachial DCBP and cSBP was 1.1 mmHg. Finally, 30 intensive care unit patients equipped with fluid-filled catheter in the radial artery were prospectively studied. The cSBP (115.7 ± 18.2 mmHg) was estimated by carotid tonometry. The error between radial DCBP and cSBP was -0.4 ± 5.8 mmHg, and there was no bias across the range. Conclusion: Our study shows that cSBP could be reliably estimated from MBP and DBP only, provided BP measurement errors are minimized. DCBP may have implications for assessing cardiovascular risk associated with cSBP on large BP databases, a point that deserves further studies.

Associations of central and peripheral blood pressure with the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in healthy young adults: the African-PREDICT study.

This study investigated associations of brachial and central blood pressure (BP) with detailed renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) components in a healthy young population stratified according to ethnicity and sex. We included healthy black men (n = 285) and women (n = 304) and white men (n = 278) and women (n = 305) aged 20-30 years old. We derived central systolic BP (cSBP), measured clinic and 24-h systolic and diastolic BP. Aldosterone and equilibrium angiotensin levels were assessed and used for calculating angiotensin-derived markers for plasma renin activity (PRA-S, Angiotensin I + Angiotensin II), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE-S, Angiotensin II/Angiotensin I), and two markers for adrenal effects of angiotensin II, the aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR-S, Aldosterone/PRA-S) and the aldosterone-to-angiotensin II-ratio (AA2-R, Aldosterone/Angiotensin II). Young black men and women presented with lower RAAS components and higher cSBP compared to their white counterparts (all p ≤ 0.001). In multivariable-adjusted regression analyses, positive associations of cSBP with ARR-S and AA2-R and negative associations with PRA-S and angiotensin II were found for black women (all p ≤ 0.001); this pattern was also observed for 24-h and clinic BP (p ≤ 0.045). A similar trend of RAAS associations was present in black men but only for clinic BP (all p ≤ 0.047). In white men, negative associations between clinic SBP and PRA-S, angiotensin II and aldosterone were detected (all p ≤ 0.048). No associations were observed in white women. Positive associations of central and peripheral BP with the ratio of aldosterone to PRA-S and angiotensin II only in healthy, young black adults suggest that relative aldosterone excess may contribute to early hypertension development in this group.

Evolution of isolated systolic hypertension with normal central blood pressure in adolescents-prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of isolated systolic hypertension with normal central blood pressure known as spurious hypertension (sHT) in adolescents and its evolution over time is not known. METHODS: The aim of this study was to analyze changes in office, ambulatory blood pressure (ABPM), central systolic blood pressure (cSBP), hemodynamic parameters, and target organ damage (TOD) over a 1-year follow-up in a group of non-obese children with sHT. RESULTS: Of 294 patients referred for primary hypertension, 138 patients (31 girls; 22%) had hypertension confirmed by ABPM. 48/138 (35%) patients (7 girls; 15%) were diagnosed with sHT (elevated office and ambulatory systolic BP, but normal cSBP); 43 of them (6 girls; 14%) were followed for 12 ± 3 months during non-pharmacological therapy. At baseline 7 (16%) patients had borderline values of cIMT or LVMi indicating mild TOD. After 12 months, 10/43 (3 girls; 23%) patients developed sustained HT (elevated office, ambulatory BP and cSBP), 11/43 (1 girl; 26%) maintained sHT, and 22/43 (2 girls; 51%) evolved to white coat hypertension or normotension. The cSBP values increased in 27 patients (4 girls; 63%), but the group average remained in the normal range. Prevalence of TOD did not change during observation. The multivariate regression analysis showed that the only predictor of cSBP change over time was a change in serum uric acid level. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, after 1 year of non-pharmacological treatment, 23% of adolescents with sHT developed sustained hypertension, with the main predictor of cSBP change being the change in serum uric acid.

The effect of acute aerobic exercise on central arterial stiffness, wave reflections, and hemodynamics in adults with diabetes: A randomized cross-over design.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with diabetes have greater central arterial stiffness, wave reflections, and hemodynamics, all of which promote the accelerated cardiovascular pathology seen in this population. Acute aerobic exercise has been shown to be an effective strategy for reducing central arterial stiffness, wave reflections, and hemodynamics in healthy individuals; however, the effects of acute aerobic exercise in reducing these outcomes is not well established in people with diabetes. Recently, implementation of high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) has shown superior improvements in cardiovascular health outcomes when compared to traditional aerobic exercise. Yet, the effect of HIIE on the aforementioned outcomes in people with diabetes is not known. The purpose of this study was to (i) describe the central arterial stiffness, wave reflections, and hemodynamic responses to a bout of HIIE and moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICE) in adults with diabetes; and (ii) compare the effects of HIIE and MICE on the aforementioned outcomes. METHODS: A total of 24 adult men and women (aged 29-59 years old) with type 1 (n = 12) and type 2 (n = 12) diabetes participated in a randomized cross-over study. All participants completed the following protocols: (i) HIIE: cycling for 4 × 4 min at 85%-95% of heart rate peak (HRpeak), interspersed with 3 min of active recovery at 60%-70%HRpeak; (ii) MICE: 33 min of continuous cycling at 60%-70%HRpeak; and (iii) control (CON): lying quietly in a supine position for 30 min. RESULTS: A significant group × time effect was found for changes in central systolic blood pressure (F = 3.20, p = 0.01) with a transient reduction for the HIIE group but not for the MICE or CON groups. There was a significant group × time effect for changes in augmentation index at a heart rate of 75 beats/min (F = 2.32, p = 0.04) with a decrease following for HIIE and MICE but not for CON. For all other measures of central arterial stiffness and hemodynamics, no significant changes were observed (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: A bout of HIIE appears to lead to a greater transient reduction in central systolic blood pressure than the reduction observed following MICE; however, both HIIE and MICE improved augmentation index at a heart rate of 75 beats/min in people with diabetes. There was no significant difference in response to HIIE and MICE in all outcomes. This provides preliminary evidence on the role of HIIE on such outcomes in people with diabetes.

Relation between Oscillometric Measurement of Central Hemodynamics and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Hypertensive Patients.

INTRODUCTION: The augmentation index (AIx) or central systolic blood pressure (SBP), measured by radial applanation tonometry, has been reported to be independently associated with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in Japanese hypertensive patients. Cuff-based oscillometric measurement of the AIx using Mobil-O-Graph® showed a low or moderate agreement with the AIx measurement with other devices. METHODS: The AIx measured using the Mobil-O-Graph was validated against the tonometric measurements of the radial AIx measured using HEM-9000AI in 110 normotensive healthy individuals (age, 21-76 years; 50 men). We investigated the relationship between the central hemodynamics assessed using the Mobil-O-Graph and LVH in 100 hypertensive patients (age, 54-75 years; 48 men), presenting a wall thickness of ≥11 mm and ≥10 mm in men and women, respectively. RESULTS: Although the Mobil-O-Graph-measured central AIx showed no negative values, it correlated moderately with the HEM-9000AI-measured radial AIx (r = 0.602, p < 0.001) in the normotensive individuals. The hypertensive patients did not show a significant difference in the central SBP between the sexes, but the central AIx was lower in men than in women. The independent determinants influencing left ventricle (LV) mass index (LVMI) (R2 = 0.362; adjusted R2 = 0.329, p < 0.001) were heart rate (ß = -0.568 ± 0.149, p < 0.001), central SBP (ß = 0.290 ± 0.100, p = 0.005), and aortic root diameter (ß = 1.355 ± 0.344, p = 0.001). Age (ß = -0.025 ± 0.124, p = 0.841) and the central AIx (ß = 0.120 ± 0.131, p = 0.361) were not independently associated with the LVMI. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the central AIx for the presence of LVH (LVMI >118 g/m2 in men or >108 g/m2 in women) was statistically significant in men (0.875, p < 0.001) but not in women (0.622, p = 0.132). In men, a central AIx of 28.06% had a sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 80.0% for detecting LVH. CONCLUSIONS: AIx measurement in men provided useful prognostic information for the presence of LVH. Pulse-wave analysis assessed using the Mobil-O-Graph may be a valuable tool for detecting LVH in hypertensive patients.

The association between sympatho-vagal balance and central blood pressures.

PURPOSE: High central blood pressure is more predictive of cardiovascular disease (CVD) versus high peripheral blood pressure. Measures of central pressures (CPs) include, central systolic blood pressure (CSBP) and central diastolic blood pressure. Measures of central pressures augmentation (CPsA) include augmentation pressure (AP) and the augmentation index @ 75 beats·min-1 (AIx@75). Increased sympathetic tone (ST) is also associated with CVD. The low to high frequency ratio (LF/HF) is often used to determine sympatho-vagal balance. Given the association between ST, CPs, CPsA and CVD there is a need to understand the association between these predictors of CVD. The aims of this study were to examine the association between the LF/HF ratio, CPs, and CPsA in men and women collectively and based on gender. METHODS: We measured the LF/HF ratio, CSBP, AP, and AIx@75 in 102 participants (41F/61M). The LF/HF ratio was determined via power spectral density analysis. CSBP, AP, and AIx@75 were determined via applanation tonometry. RESULTS: The LF/HF ratio was inversely associated with AP (r = -0.26) and AIx @75 (r = -0.29) in the combined group of men and women. The LF/HF ratio was inversely associated with CSBP (r = -0.27), AP (r = -0.28), and AIx@75 (r = -0.32) in men, but not in women. CONCLUSION: There is an inverse association between the LF/HF ratio, AP, and AIx@75 in men and women combined. The association between the LF/HF ratio, CSBP, AP, and AIx@75, differs based on gender.

Central rather than brachial pressures are stronger predictors of cardiovascular outcomes: A longitudinal prospective study in a Chinese population.

The purpose of this study was to assess the association of blood pressure (BP) measurements with the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and examine whether central systolic BP (CSBP) predicts CVD better than brachial BP measurements (SBP and pulse pressure [PP]). Based on a cross-sectional study conducted in 2009-2010 with follow-up in 2016-2017 among 35- to 64-year-old subjects in China, we evaluated the performance of non-invasively predicted CSBP over brachial BP measurements on the first CVD events. Each BP measurement, individually and jointly with another BP measurement, was entered into the multivariate Cox proportional-hazards models, to examine the predictability of central and brachial BP measurements. Mean age of participants (n = 8710) was 50.1 years at baseline. After a median follow-up of 6.36 years, 187 CVD events occurred. CSBP was a stronger predictor for CVD than brachial BP measurements (CSBP, 1-standard deviation increment HR = 1.49, 95%CI: 1.31-1.70). With CSBP and SBP entering into models jointly, the HR for CSBP and SBP was 1.28 (1.04-1.58) and 1.22 (0.98-1.50), respectively. With CSBP and PP entering into models jointly, the HR for CSBP and PP was 1.51 (1.28-1.78) and 0.98 (0.83-1.15), respectively. For subgroup analysis, the association of CSBP with CVD was stronger than brachial BP measurements in women, those with hypertension and obesity. In the middle-aged Chinese population, noninvasively estimated CSBP may offer advantages over brachial BP measurements to predict CVD events, especially for participants with higher risk. These findings suggest prospective assessment of CSBP as a prevention and treatment target in further trials.

Relationship between sleep-disordered breathing and central systolic blood pressure in a community-based population: the Toon Health Study.

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is linked with brachial blood pressure. Although central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) is a better predictor of cardiovascular diseases than is brachial blood pressure, the association between SDB and cSBP is not fully understood. This cross-sectional study included 1484 participants without cardiovascular diseases who were enrolled in the Toon Health Study between 2009 and 2012. The respiratory disturbance index (RDI) was estimated with a one-night sleep test using an airflow monitor. Participants were grouped into three categories according to RDI level: mild (<10 events/h), moderate (10 to <20 events/h), and severe (≥20 events/h). The cSBP was measured using a noninvasive automated tonometer. Multivariable-adjusted cSBP means for the mild, moderate, and severe RDI categories were, respectively, 116.0, 118.0, and 120.7 mm Hg (p for trend = 0.02) for men and 111.8, 113.7, and 111.7 mm Hg (p for trend = 0.59) for women. The association for men was no longer significant after adjusting for BMI. When stratified by BMI (<22 or ≥22 kg/m2), the RDI was associated with cSBP among men with BMI ≥ 22 kg/m2, and this association was of borderline significance. Augmentation index, pulse pressure amplification, and brachial blood pressure were not significantly associated with the RDI. Higher RDI values were associated with increased multivariable-adjusted cSBP means among men. This association was more evident among those with BMI ≥ 22 kg/m2. In conclusion, we found that the RDI was associated with cSBP among men, and this association was independent of confounding variables among individuals above the ideal weight.

Pulse wave analysis using the Mobil-O-Graph, Arteriograph and Complior device: a comparative study.

PURPOSE: Pulse wave velocity (PWV) is a marker of arterial stiffness with major prognostic value. We compared Arteriograph and Complior devices with the Mobil-O-Graph for assessment of PWV and central systolic blood pressure (cSBP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 316 consecutive subjects (age: 55 ± 14 years). For each individual, we measured PWV and cSBP with Arteriograph, Complior and Mobil-O-Graph and compared the readings. Differences in values among three devices were calculated for each measurement. We used Bland-Altman analysis, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV). RESULTS: Bland-Altman analysis indicated a mean difference for PWV: i.0.5 m/s (limits of agreement -1.4-2.4) between Complior and Mobil-O-Graph, ii.0.6 m/s (limits of agreement -1.4-2.6) between Arteriograph and Mobil-O-Graph. cSBP mean difference was 3.8 mmHg between Complior and Mobil-O-Graph (limits of agreement -12.5-20.1) and 9.2 mmHg between Arteriograph and Mobil-O-Graph (limits of agreement -7.6-26). ICC for PWV was 0.86 between Arteriograph and Mobil-O-Graph, 0.87 between Complior and Mobil-O-Graph and for cSBP 0.92 and 0.91 respectively. CV for PWV was 9.5% between Arteriograph and Mobil-O-Graph, 8.8% between Complior and Mobil-O-Graph. Respective values for cSBP were 6.8% and 5.1%. CONCLUSION: Our study shows acceptable agreement among the three devices regarding pulse wave analysis markers though Mobil-O-Graph appears to underestimate the values of these markers. Further studies are needed to explore the agreement between the 3 devices in various clinical settings and patient populations.