Survival, function, and immune profiling after beating heart transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: Ex vivo normothermic perfusion of cardiac allografts has expanded the donor pool for heart transplant. Using a beating heart implantation method avoids the second cardioplegic arrest and subsequent ischemia-reperfusion injury typically associated with ex vivo heart perfusion. We sought to describe our institutional experience with beating heart transplantation. METHODS: This was a single-institution retrospective study of adult patients who underwent heart transplantation using ex vivo heart perfusion (EVHP) and a beating heart implantation technique between October 2022 and March 2024. Primary outcomes of interest included survival, initiation of mechanical circulatory support, and rejection. A subanalysis of our institutional series of nonbeating deceased after circulatory death (DCD) heart transplantations was performed as well. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients underwent isolated heart transplantation with the use of ex vivo heart perfusion and beating heart implantation between October 2022 and March 2024; 21 (87.5%) received hearts from DCD donors, and 3 (12.5%) received hearts from deceased after brain death (DBD) donors. The median duration of follow-up was 192 days (interquartile range [IQR], 124-253.5 days), and 23 out of 24 patients (95.8%) were alive at last follow-up. No patients required initiation of mechanical circulatory support. The majority of patients had pathologic grade 0 rejection at the time of biopsy (n = 16; 66.7%), and the median cell-free DNA percent was 0.04% (IQR, 0.04%-0.09%). The rate of mechanical circulatory support initiation in the 22-patient nonbeating DCD heart transplant cohort was significantly higher, at 36.4% (P < .005). CONCLUSIONS: A beating heart implantation technique can be used for transplantation of DCD and DBD hearts on EVHP and is associated with excellent survival and low levels of rejection.

Adding the oxygen carrier M101 to a cold-storage solution could be an alternative to HOPE for liver graft preservation.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) is a promising technique for providing oxygen to the liver during graft preservation; however, because of associated logistical constraints, addition of an oxygen transporter to static cold-storage solutions (SCS) might be easier. M101 is marine worm haemoglobin that has been shown to improve kidney preservation in the clinic when added to SCS. This study evaluated the effects of the addition of M101 to SCS on the quality of pig liver graft preservation. METHODS: Pig liver grafts were preserved using SCS, HOPE, or SCS+M101, and the liver functions were compared during cold preservation and after orthotopic allotransplantation (OLT) in pigs. RESULTS: During preservation of the liver grafts, mitochondrial function, ATP synthesis, antioxidant capacities, and hepatocyte architecture were better preserved, and free radical production, antioxidant activities, and inflammatory mediators were lower, with HOPE or SCS+M101 than with SCS alone. However, after 1 h of preservation, liver functions with HOPE were superior to those with SCS+M101. After 6 h of preservation and OLT, blood levels of aspartate and alanine aminotransferases and lactate dehydrogenase increased with a peak effect at Day 1 post-transplant; values were similar with HOPE and SCS+M101, and were significantly lower than those in the SCS group. At Days 1 and 3, tumor necrosis factor α levels remained lower with HOPE and SCS+M101 vs. SCS. At Day 7, liver cell necrosis and inflammation were less marked in both oxygenated groups. CONCLUSIONS: When added to SCS, M101 effectively oxygenates liver grafts during preservation, preventing post-transplant injury; although graft performances are below those achieved with HOPE. LAY SUMMARY: When transported between donors and recipients, even cold-stored liver grafts need oxygen to maintain their viability. To provide them with oxygen, we added a marine worm super haemoglobin (M101) to the cold-storage solution UWCS. Using a pig liver transplant model, we revealed that livers cold stored with UWCS+M101 showed improved oxygenation compared with simple cold-storage solutions, but did not reach the oxygenation level achieved with machine perfusion.

Going the distance for procurement of donation after circulatory death livers for transplantation-Does reimbursement reflect reality?

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplantation (LT) has increased slowly over the past decade. Given that transplant surgeons generally determine liver offer acceptance, understanding surgeon incentives and disincentives is paramount. The purpose of this study was to assess aggregate travel distance per successful DCD versus deceased after brain death (DBD) liver procurement as a surrogate for surgeon time expenditure and opportunity cost. All consecutive liver offers made to Michigan Medicine from 2006 to 2017 were analyzed. Primary outcome was the summative travel distance (spent on all attempted procurements) per successful liver procurement that resulted in LT. Donation after circulatory death liver offer acceptance was lower than DBD liver offers, as was proportion of successful procurements among accepted offers. Overall, 10 275 miles were travelled for accepted DCD liver offers, resulting in 23 successful procurements (mean 447 miles per successful DCD liver procurement). For accepted DBD liver offers, 197 299 miles were travelled, resulting in 863 successful procurements (mean 229 miles per successful DBD liver procurement). On average, each successful DCD liver procurement required 218 more miles of travel than each successful DBD liver procurement. Current reimbursement policies poorly reflect increased surgeon travel (and time) expenditures between DCD and DBD liver offers.

Complement Therapeutics in the Multi-Organ Donor: Do or Don't?

Over the last decade, striking progress has been made in the field of organ transplantation, such as better surgical expertise and preservation techniques. Therefore, organ transplantation is nowadays considered a successful treatment in end-stage diseases of various organs, e.g. the kidney, liver, intestine, heart, and lungs. However, there are still barriers which prevent a lifelong survival of the donor graft in the recipient. Activation of the immune system is an important limiting factor in the transplantation process. As part of this pro-inflammatory environment, the complement system is triggered. Complement activation plays a key role in the transplantation process, as highlighted by the amount of studies in ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) and rejection. However, new insight have shown that complement is not only activated in the later stages of transplantation, but already commences in the donor. In deceased donors, complement activation is associated with deteriorated quality of deceased donor organs. Of importance, since most donor organs are derived from either brain-dead donors or deceased after circulatory death donors. The exact mechanisms and the role of the complement system in the pathophysiology of the deceased donor have been underexposed. This review provides an overview of the current knowledge on complement activation in the (multi-)organ donor. Targeting the complement system might be a promising therapeutic strategy to improve the quality of various donor organs. Therefore, we will discuss the complement therapeutics that already have been tested in the donor. Finally, we question whether complement therapeutics should be translated to the clinics and if all organs share the same potential complement targets, considering the physiological differences of each organ.