Subcutaneous efgartigimod PH20 in generalized myasthenia gravis: A phase 3 randomized noninferiority study (ADAPT-SC) and interim analyses of a long-term open-label extension study (ADAPT-SC+).

ADAPT-SC (NCT04735432) was designed to evaluate noninferiority of subcutaneous (SC) efgartigimod PH20 to intravenous (IV) efgartigimod in participants with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). ADAPT-SC+ (NCT04818671) is an open-label extension study designed to assess long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of efgartigimod PH20 SC. Adult participants in ADAPT-SC were randomly assigned to receive a treatment cycle of 4 once-weekly administrations of efgartigimod PH20 SC 1000 â€‹mg or efgartigimod IV 10 â€‹mg/kg, followed by 7 weeks of follow-up. Primary endpoint was percentage change from baseline in total immunoglobulin G (IgG) level at week 4 (1 week after the fourth administration). Secondary efficacy endpoints assessed number and percentage of Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) responders and mean change from baseline in total score for each measure. The primary endpoint was met, demonstrating noninferiority in total IgG reduction between efgartigimod PH20 SC 1000 â€‹mg and efgartigimod IV 10 â€‹mg/kg. Clinically meaningful improvements were seen as early as 1 week following the first administration in both treatment arms, with maximal improvements at week 4. Continued treatment cycles of efgartigimod PH20 SC in ADAPT-SC+ have demonstrated long-term safety and consistent improvements in MG-ADL total score. Findings from ADAPT-SC and ADAPT-SC+ demonstrate similar safety and efficacy as observed in the placebo-controlled ADAPT study. Collectively, these findings support noninferiority between efgartigimod PH20 SC 1000 â€‹mg and efgartigimod IV 10 â€‹mg/kg, as well as long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of efgartigimod PH20 SC for treatment of a broad population of patients with gMG.

Efgartigimod as a promising add-on therapy for myasthenic crisis: a prospective case series.

Introduction: Efgartigimod is effective and well-tolerated in patients with anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis (MG). However, the therapeutic potential and the safety profile of efgartigimod in myasthenic crisis (MC) remained largely unknown. Methods: This is an observational, prospective, multicenter, real-world study to follow 2 MC patients who initiated efgartigimod as a first-line rescue therapy and 8 cases who used it as an add-on therapy. Baseline demographic features and immunotherapies were collected, and the MG-activities of daily living (MG-ADL) scale was evaluated every week since efgartigimod treatment for 8 weeks. Additionally, serum IgG and anti-AChR antibody levels and the peripheral CD4+ T lymphocytes were measured before and after one cycle of treatment. Results: Ten patients with MC were enrolled in the study, including 9 anti-AChR antibody positive and 1 anti-muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) positive. All patients were successfully weaned from the ventilation after receiving efgartigimod treatment, with a length of 10.44 ± 4.30 days. After one cycle of infusions, the MG-ADL score reduced from 15.6 ± 4.4 at the baseline to 3.4 ± 2.2, while the corticosteroid dose was tapered from 55.0 ± 20.7 mg to 26.0 ± 14.1 mg. The proportions of regulatory T cells and naïve T cells (% in CD4+ T) significantly decreased post-efgartigimod treatment (5.48 ± 1.23 vs. 6.90 ± 1.80, P=0.0313, and 34.98 ± 6.47 vs. 43.68 ± 6.54, P=0.0313, respectively). Conclusion: These findings validated the rapid action of efgartigimod in facilitating the weaning process with a good safety profile in patients with MC.

Efgartigimod Successfully Ameliorated Acute Exacerbation of Myasthenia Gravis with Anti-muscle-specific Kinase Antibodies.

We herein report two patients with anti-muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) antibody-positive myasthenia gravis who experienced rapid deterioration of weakness, particularly respiratory muscle weakness, necessitating non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) and were treated with efgartigimod. After treatment initiation, a rapid reduction in IgG levels and recovery from clinical symptoms were observed. NIPPV was no longer required two to three weeks after the first infusion of efgartigimod. These findings suggest that the reduction of IgG levels using efgartigimod is a good treatment option in patients with myasthenia gravis positive for anti-MuSK antibodies, even during the acute phase of the disease.

Efgartigimod combined with steroids as a fast-acting therapy for myasthenic crisis: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) can be managed with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEis; e.g., pyridostigmine), corticosteroids, other immunosuppressive drugs (e.g., tacrolimus), and their combinations. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) or plasmapheresis (PLEX) may be administered if symptoms persist. PLEX and IVIg are also mainstays of treatment for myasthenic crisis. Recently, efgartigimod was approved in Japan for treating adults with gMG (irrespective of the antibody status) who do not have a sufficient response to corticosteroids and nonsteroidal immunosuppressive therapies. Efgartigimod is generally safe and well tolerated. However, since phase III trials of efgartigimod excluded those with myasthenic crisis, the efficacy of efgartigimod in treating myasthenic crisis is still unclear. Moreover, there are no reports that efgartigimod therapy can reduce the dose of corticosteroids needed to achieve a minimal manifestation status. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 70-yeat-old woman with gMG who developed a myasthenic crisis. After she was diagnosed with gMG, the patient had been treated with oral corticosteroids and tacrolimus for 1 year. However, she refused to continue taking the medication, and two weeks later, she developed ptosis, dysphagia and dyspnea. The patient was intubated and treated with efgartigimod in combination with steroid therapy, and she recovered without PLEX or IVIg. Afterward, when she experienced worsening of fatigue and increased levels of anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies, efgartigimod therapy was effective. The patient achieved minimal manifestation status even after the reduction of corticosteroids and showed improvements in the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living scales after 4 cycles of efgartigimod infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Our case suggests that efgartigimod can be an alternative drug for achieving minimal manifestation status in patients with myasthenic crisis. Considering its strong efficacy and safety, efgartigimod could be expanded to use as bridging therapy in the acute and chronic phases of gMG.

Efgartigimod as a fast-acting add-on therapy in manifest and impending myasthenic crisis: A single-center case series.

Efgartigimod was the first-in-class neonatal Fc receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of acetylcholine receptor antibody positive (AChR+), Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Class II-IV generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) patients. As a novel therapy, the clinical experiences are still lacking, especially for the use of efgartigimod in manifest and impending myasthenic crisis (IMC). We reported three AChR+, gMG patients, two with myasthenic crisis (MC) and one with IMC, treated with efgartigimod. MGFA class, MG-Activity of Daily Living score (MG-ADL), Quantitative MG score (QMG), and Muscle Research Council sum score (MRC), concentration of anti-AChR antibody, IgG, globulin, and albumin, subsets of T and B lymphocyte were evaluated or measured before, during and after efgartigimod treatment. All patients showed fast and robust response to efgartigimod with marked improvement in MGFA, MG-ADL, QMG, and MRC scores. Patient 1 did not respond effectively to IVIg but was successfully rescued by add-on efgartigimod. She extubated at 7 days after the first infusion and got rid of NIV after 14-days treatment. Patient 2 and patient 3 directly used efgartigimod when symptoms were not ameliorated by adjusting of oral drugs. Patient 2 wean from BiPAP at seven days after the first infusion. Patient 3 in IMC status, overcame the severe dysphagia at three days after the first infusion. Clinical symptoms continued to improve 1-2 weeks after discharge. Concentration of anti-AChR antibody, IgG and globulin were remarkably reduced by efgartigimod treatment. Our study supported that efgartigimod could act as a fast-acting rescue therapy for patients with MC or IMC. Larger studies from multicenter are required to provide further evidence.

Efgartigimod-associated Kaposi's varicelliform eruption and herpetic conjunctivitis in a patient with seropositive ocular myasthenia gravis: a case report and review.

Background: Efgartigimod (Efgartigimod alpha fcab, Vyvgart™) is a pioneering neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) antagonist for the treatment of severe autoimmune diseases mediated by pathogenic immunoglobulin G (IgG) autoantibodies, including myasthenia gravis (MG). It is a well-tolerated drug with minor side effects, such as headache and upper respiratory (lung) and urinary tract infections. Here, we present a case of Kaposi's varicelliform eruption (KVE) and herpetic conjunctivitis related to efgartigimod in a 60-year-old patient with ocular MG (OMG). Case description: A 60-year-old Chinese male suffered from acetylcholine receptor antibody positive (AChR Ab+) OMG for 8 years. During this period, he underwent first-line treatment with systemic corticosteroids, cyclosporine, cyclophosphamide, and so on, but had poor symptom improvement. On the recommendation of his attending neurologist, he received one cycle of intravenous efgartigimod (10mg/kg, once weekly for 4 weeks). The patient experienced fever, widespread painful blisters, and edema on the face on the third day after his last intravenous infusion. The patient also complained of increased secretions and a foreign body sensation in both eyes. Laboratory tests confirmed infection with herpes simplex virus (HSV). A diagnosis of efgartigimod-associated KVE and herpetic conjunctivitis was made. After intravenous administration (5mg/kg, 3 times a day, every 8 hours) for 10 days, the patient was cured without residual complications. Conclusions: This case is the first report of a patient with KVE and herpetic conjunctivitis related to efgartigimod in PubMed. This is rare and unusual. Clinicians should be alert to the rare symptoms related to efgartigimod.

Prospective cohort study evaluating efficacy and safety of efgartigimod in Chinese generalized myasthenia gravis patients.

Background: Despite the efficacy of efgartigimod demonstrated in ADAPT phase 3 trial, data specifically derived from Chinese participants are not available. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of efgartigimod in Chinese patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). Methods: This is a prospective cohort study conducted in 8 hospitals across China. gMG patients received weekly intravenous infusions of efgartigimod (10 mg/kg) under a named patient program (NPP). The present study is an 8-week study, consisting of 4 consecutive doses of efgartigimod administered over 3 weeks (one cycle), followed by a 5-week follow-up period to assess the tolerability of efgartigimod's therapeutic effects. The primary outcome was the mean change in MG activities of daily living (MG-ADL) total score from baseline to 4 weeks. MG-ADL responder was defined as a ≥ 2-point improvement that persisted for 4 weeks, starting by week 4. Safety evaluations encompassed the monitoring of adverse events (AE) and serious AE (SAE) throughout the study. Results: Between 5 July 2022 and 25 August 2023, a total of 14 gMG patients were included. The mean age was 57.7 years, with a mean MG-ADL score of 10.86 ± 3.32. At week 4, MG-ADL scores showed a mean reduction of 6 points, reaching a maximum decline of 13 points. Among the patients, 85.7% (12/14) achieved MG-ADL responder status after one cycle of treatment. The most significant reduction in quantitative MG (QMG) scores also occurred at week 4, with a mean decrease of 7 points. Notably, the improvements in MG-ADL and QMG scores persisted until week 8. During treatment and follow-up period, only two mild neck rashes occurred and resolved promptly. No infections or SAE were reported. Discussion: A single cycle of efgartigimod treatment demonstrates effectiveness and the tolerability through week 8, with no new safety signals observed in Chinese gMG patients.

Resolution of anti-LGI1-associated autoimmune encephalitis in a patient after treatment with efgartigimod.

BACKGROUND: Anti leucine-rich, glioma inactivated 1 (LGI1) antibody-associated autoimmune encephalitis (AE) is the second most common AE, where the trafficking and recycling of the pathogenic immunoglobulin (IgG) can be controlled by the neonatal crystallizable fragment receptor (FcRn), making the latter as a candidate therapeutic target. Efgartigimod is an antagonist of FcRn, its ability to increase the degradation of IgGs and improve the health and quality of life of patients. ADAPT trail indicated its rapid efficacy and safety on myasthenia gravis. However, there is currently no case reported using efgartigimod for the treatment of anti-LGI1-associated AE. CASE DESCRIPTION: The patient presented with five episodes of generalized tonic-clonic seizures in the past 2 weeks. The patient had no abnormal signs on magnetic resonance imaging. Electroencephalogram examinations showed an increase in bilateral symmetric or asymmetric slow activity, without any clear epileptic waves. The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination results indicated a slight increase in protein (47 mg/dL). The anti-LGI1 antibody titer in serum was 1:100 and that in CSF was 1:3.2. The treatment with intravenous methylprednisolone 1000 mg once a day combined with levetiracetam tablets failed to completely control the patient's seizures. Thus, 10 mg/kg efgartigimod was administered intravenously once a week for 2 weeks. After 2 weeks of treatment, serum levels of anti-LGI1 antibody and IgG decreased and the patient's epilepsy did not recur in the next 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first case report of using efgartigimod to treat anti-LGI1-associated AE. The combination of efgartigimod and methylprednisolone resulted in favorable outcomes, indicating that this is an optional treatment plan.

Successful treatment with efgartigimod as an add-on therapy in acute attack of anti-AQP4 antibody-positive NMOSD: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD) is an autoimmune demyelinating disease characterized by recurrent myelitis and optic neuritis. It is associated with high rates of relapse and disability. The main treatment strategies for acute attacks include intravenous methylprednisolone pulse (IVMP) treatment and rescue treatment with plasma exchange (PLEX). Recently, the blockade of neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn)-IgG interaction has gained momentum as a therapeutic strategy. Efgartigimod, the first approved FcRn inhibitor for treating generalized myasthenia gravis, has shown impressive safety, efficacy, and tolerability, and is being regarded as "PLEX in a bottle". CASE DESCRIPTION: We report a 65-year-old female patient who was diagnosed with anti-AQP4 antibody positive NMOSD. Add-on treatment with efgartigimod to IVMP and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) at the second acute relapse showed favorable results. CONCLUSION: This case suggests that efgartigimod is a potentially effective add-on therapy in acute attacks of AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD.

Case report: Rapid clinical improvement in acute exacerbation of MuSK-MG with efgartigimod.

Myasthenia gravis with positive MuSK antibody often involves the bulbar muscles and is usually refractory to acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. For MuSK-MG patients who experience acute exacerbations and do not respond to conventional treatments, there is an urgent need to find more suitable treatment options. With the advent of biologic agents, efgartigimod has shown promising results in the treatment of MG. We report a 65-year-old MuSK-MG patient who presented with impaired eye movements initially, and the symptoms rapidly worsened within a week, affecting the limbs and neck muscles, and had difficulties in chewing and swallowing. Lymphoplasmapheresis did not achieve satisfactory results, but after a cycle of efgartigimod treatment, the patient's symptoms gradually improved and remained in a good clinical state for several months.

Real-World Case Series of Efgartigimod for Japanese Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: Well-Tailored Treatment Cycle Intervals Contribute to Sustained Symptom Control.

INTRODUCTION: Myasthenia gravis (MG), an immune disorder affecting nerve-muscle transmission, often necessitates tailored therapies to alleviate longitudinal symptom fluctuations. Here, we aimed to examine and compare the treatment cycle intervals and efficacy of efgartigimod in four patients. This case series mainly offers insights into personalized treatment cycle intervals and the efficacy of efgartigimod for patients with MG in our facility in Japan. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed four patients with MG (2 patients with early-onset, 1 with late-onset, and 1 with seronegative MG, mainly managed with oral immunosuppressants as prior treatments) who completed four or more cycles of efgartigimod treatment from January 2022 to September 2023. We focused on changes in serum immunoglobulin (IgG) level, acetylcholine receptor antibody (AChR-Ab) titer, and quantitative MG (QMG) score. RESULTS: Efgartigimod, administered at a median of 5.0 [IQR 5.0, 7.5] weeks between cycles, led to decreased serum IgG levels in all patients and reduced AChR-Ab titers in seropositive patients. All patients showed sustained MG symptom improvement, with considerably reduced QMG scores before efgartigimod treatment. None of the patients required rescue medications or developed treatment-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Customized efgartigimod administration intervals effectively enhanced clinical outcomes in patients with MG without notable symptom fluctuations, demonstrating the benefits of individualized treatment approaches and validating the safety of efgartigimod during the study period.

Efgartigimod in refractory autoimmune myasthenia gravis.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Efgartigimod, a neonatal Fc-receptor inhibitor, has recently been approved as treatment for myasthenia gravis (MG). In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to systematically assess short- and long-term effectiveness of efgartigimod in patients with refractory MG. METHODS: Sixteen patients with refractory autoimmune acetylcholine receptor MG were treated with efgartigimod. Data were collected from January 2021 to March 2023 on Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score (QMG), Myasthenia Gravis Composite score (MGC) and the 15-item revised version of the Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life questionnaire (MG-QoL15r). RESULTS: A favorable outcome was seen in 56% of patients at the last measurement. Out of 16 patients, 50% were an MG-ADL responder after the first treatment cycle. After 4 weeks, a clinically meaningful improvement compared to baseline was seen on the MG-ADL, QMG, and MGC. There was a statistically significant improvement on the MGQoL15r from baseline to week 4. The improvement was maintained until the last measurement for the MGC and the MGQoL15r. At the last visit, all patients had discontinued 4-weekly dosages, shifting to administration frequencies of 1, 2, or 3 weeks. Drug doses could be decreased for prednisolone (n = 7), azathioprine (n = 2), and intravenous immunoglobulin (n = 9). Frequency of plasma exchange was decreased in nine patients. DISCUSSION: In patients with refractory MG, efgartigimod was effective for at least half of all patients. Patients required more frequent dosing compared to the ADAPT phase 3 trial. In 80% of the patients concurrent medication could be reduced or discontinued.

Overcoming therapeutic challenges: Successful management of a supposedly triple seronegative, refractory generalized myasthenia gravis patient with efgartigimod.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to highlight neonatal Fc receptor inhibition (efgartigimod) as a valuable therapeutic option for patients with refractory seronegative myasthenia gravis (MG) and to emphasize the concept that seronegative MG is greatly constrained by the limitations of currently available diagnostic methods and therapeutic measures. METHODS: We describe the first refractory, generalized MG (gMG) patient successfully treated with efgartigimod after testing negative on standard autoantibody detection tests. RESULTS: Our patient presented with severe fluctuating bulbar and generalized weakness, resulting in multiple myasthenic crises requiring intubation. After a 28-year medical history of multiple failed lines of treatment, our patient was started on efgartigimod. Over five treatment cycles, a definite improvement in her clinical condition was observed (Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America class: IIIb to IIb; MG-Activities of Daily Living score: 11 to 0; MG-Quality of Life 15 score: 30 to 0; Quantitative MG score: 28 to 6). Standard autoantibody detection tests failed to detect known pathogenic autoantibodies, but cell-based assay (CBA) identified autoantibodies against clustered adult acetylcholine receptor (AChR). CONCLUSIONS: In light of recent approvals of efgartigimod by the European Medicines Agency and US Food and Drug Administration exclusively for AChR-positive gMG forms, our case highlights evidence suggesting that such an approach might be shortsighted and could limit therapeutic options for patients with refractory seronegative gMG. Additionally, introducing more sensitive analytical techniques, exemplified by CBA, may help bridge the gap between seronegative and seropositive patients. This represents an urgent unmet need for gMG patients, as the antibody profile dramatically influences the therapeutic approach.

Case report: A highly active refractory myasthenia gravis with treatment of telitacicept combined with efgartigimod.

There is always a lack of effective treatment for highly active refractory generalized myasthenia gravis (GMG). Recently, telitacicept combined with efgartigimod significantly reduces circulating B cells, plasma cells, and immunoglobulin G, which brings promising therapeutic strategies. We report a case of a 37-year-old female patient with refractory GMG, whose condition got significant improvement and control with this latest treatment after multiple unsuccessful therapies of immunosuppressants. The new combination deserves further attention in the therapeutic application of myasthenia gravis.

Retrospective analysis of efgartigimod use in patients with double-seronegative generalized myasthenia gravis: a case series.

The effect of treatment with efgartigimod in seronegative myasthenia gravis (MG) remains unclear. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate symptomatic changes and safety of treatment with efgartigimod in patients with generalized MG (gMG) double-seronegative for acetylcholine receptor antibody and muscle-specific kinase antibody. We reviewed the medical records of double-seronegative gMG treated with 10 mg/kg efgartigimod once/week per cycle (4 weeks) from June 2022 to June 2023. A total of 16 patients were included. MG-activities of daily living (ADL) scores improved from 9.2 to 7.4. Mean prednisolone dose was reduced from 5.4 to 4.1 mg/day. The duration before MG-ADL deterioration after the end of a cycle was 6.1 weeks. Five patients had mild adverse events. This retrospective study revealed no significant treatment benefit in the outcomes of patients with double-seronegative gMG treated with efgartigimod.

Rescue treatment with add-on efgartigimod in a patient with impending myasthenic crisis: a case report.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by fluctuating muscle weakness. Severe patients may develop life-threatening respiratory failure and experience crisis. Plasma exchange or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is the first-line treatment option for myasthenia crisis, but some patients still poorly respond to them. Here, we first reported a generalized MG patient from China who was in a state of impending myasthenic crisis and did not respond effectively to IVIg but was successfully rescued by add-on efgartigimod. Especially, we also detected meaningful changes in T-cell and B-cell subsets after efgartigimod, promoting a potential role of efgartigimod in re-establishing immune homeostasis.

Efgartigimod as rescue treatment in acute phase of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A Case Report.

Introduction: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a central nervous system demyelinating disease. Current therapy methods, however, have limited effect on acute attacks except for intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP). Efgartigimod is a first-in-class novel human immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) Fc fragment approved for the treatment of generalized myasthenia gravis. Its capacity to rapidly decrease serum IgG levels, including pathogenic autoantibodies, positions it as a potentially effective option for managing the acute phase of NMOSD. Case presentation: We report the case of a 59-year-old female patient with acute NMOSD, presenting with vision loss and numbness in all four limbs. Despite an initial inadequate response to intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP), the addition of Efgartigimod to her treatment regimen led to rapid improvement, notably including a significant reduction in serum aquaporin-4 antibody titers, total IgG levels, and inflammation cytokine levels. Furthermore, no adverse events were reported during a four-month follow-up period. Conclusion: As an adjunct to glucocorticoid therapy, Efgartigimod has proven effective and safe for this patient. However, to ascertain its potential as a novel therapeutic option for acute NMOSD, larger-scale prospective clinical trials are required.

Efgartigimod and Ravulizumab for Treating Acetylcholine Receptor Auto-antibody-Positive (AChR-Ab+) Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: Indirect Treatment Comparison.

INTRODUCTION: Efgartigimod and ravulizumab, both approved for treating acetylcholine receptor auto-antibody-positive (AChR-Ab+) generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), have not been directly compared. This paper assessed comparative effects of efgartigimod vs. ravulizumab for treating adults with AChR-Ab+ gMG using indirect treatment comparison methods. METHODS: The matching-adjusted indirect comparison used data from two randomized trials of adult men and women. The ADAPT (efgartigimod vs. placebo; individual patient data available) population was reweighted to match the CHAMPION (ravulizumab vs. placebo; index study; aggregate data available) population. The relative effect of efgartigimod versus placebo was estimated in this reweighted population and compared with the observed ravulizumab versus placebo effect to estimate the efgartigimod versus ravulizumab effect. The outcomes were Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG), and Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life 15-item-revised scale (MG-QoL15r) assessed as cumulative effect (area under the curve; AUC) over 26 weeks (primary) and change from baseline at 4 weeks and time of best response (week 4 for efgartigimod; week 26 for ravulizumab). RESULTS: For MG-QoL15r, efgartigimod had a statistically significant improvement compared with ravulizumab over 26 weeks [mean difference (95% confidence interval): - 52.6 (- 103.0, - 2.3)], at week 4 [- 4.0 (- 6.6, - 1.4)], and at time of best response [- 3.9 (- 6.5, - 1.3)]. Efgartigimod had a statistically significant improvement over ravulizumab in MG-ADL at week 4 [- 1.9 (- 3.3, - 0.5)] and at time of best response [- 1.4 (- 2.8, 0.0)] and in QMG at week 4 [- 3.2 (- 5.2, - 1.2)] and at time of best response [- 3.0 (- 5.0, - 1.0)]. For AUC over 26 weeks, improvements were not significantly different between efgartigimod and ravulizumab for MG-ADL [- 8.7 (- 36.1, 18.8)] and QMG [- 13.7 (- 50.3, 22.9)]. CONCLUSION: Efgartigimod may provide a faster and greater improvement over 26 weeks in quality of life than ravulizumab in adults with AChR-Ab+ gMG. Efgartigimod showed faster improvements in MG-ADL and QMG than ravulizumab.

Efgartigimod as a novel FcRn inhibitor for autoimmune disease.

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) autoantibodies can lead to the formation of autoimmune diseases through Fab and/or Fc-mediated interactions with host molecules as well as activated T cells. The neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) binds at acidic pH IgG and albumin, and the mechanism for prolonging serum IgG half-life is making IgG re-entry into circulation by prompting it not to be degraded by lysosomes and back to the cell surface. Given the FcRn receptor's essential role in IgG homeostasis, one of the strategies to promote the quick degradation of endogenous IgG is to suppress the function of FcRn, which is beneficial to the treatment of IgG-driven autoimmune disorders like myasthenia gravis (MG), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), stiff person syndrome, and immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). We elaborately read the literature about efgartigimod and systematically reviewed the research progress and clinical application of this novel FcRn inhibitor in autoimmune diseases. Efgartigimod is the firstly FcRn antagonist developed and was approved on 17 December 2021 by the United States for the therapy of acetylcholine receptor-positive MG. In January 2022, efgartigimod received its second regulatory approval in Japan. In addition, the market authorization application in Europe was submitted and validated in August 2021. China's National Medical Products Administration officially accepted the marketing application of efgartigimod on July 13, 2022. To suppress the function of FcRn, which is beneficial to the treatment of IgG-driven autoimmune disorders like MG, CIDP, ITP, and stiff person syndrome. We review the rationale, clinical evidence, and future perspectives of efgartigimod for the treatment of autoimmune disease.