ABSTRACT
Protein cis-regulatory elements (CREs) are regions that modulate the activity of a protein through intramolecular interactions. Kinases, pivotal enzymes in numerous biological processes, often undergo regulatory control via inhibitory interactions in cis. This study delves into the mechanisms of cis regulation in kinases mediated by CREs, employing a combined structural and sequence analysis. To accomplish this, we curated an extensive dataset of kinases featuring annotated CREs, organized into homolog families through multiple sequence alignments. Key molecular attributes, including disorder and secondary structure content, active and ATP-binding sites, post-translational modifications, and disease-associated mutations, were systematically mapped onto all sequences. Additionally, we explored the potential for conformational changes between active and inactive states. Finally, we explored the presence of these kinases within membraneless organelles and elucidated their functional roles therein. CREs display a continuum of structures, ranging from short disordered stretches to fully folded domains. The adaptability demonstrated by CREs in achieving the common goal of kinase inhibition spans from direct autoinhibitory interaction with the active site within the kinase domain, to CREs binding to an alternative site, inducing allosteric regulation revealing distinct types of inhibitory mechanisms, which we exemplify by archetypical representative systems. While this study provides a systematic approach to comprehend kinase CREs, further experimental investigations are imperative to unravel the complexity within distinct kinase families. The insights gleaned from this research lay the foundation for future studies aiming to decipher the molecular basis of kinase dysregulation, and explore potential therapeutic interventions.
ABSTRACT
Osmotic stress conditions occur at multiple stages of plant life. Changes in water availability caused by osmotic stress induce alterations in the mechanical properties of the plasma membrane, its interaction with the cell wall, and the concentration of macromolecules in the cytoplasm. We summarize the reported players involved in the sensing mechanisms of osmotic stress in plants. We discuss how changes in macromolecular crowding are perceived intracellularly by intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) in proteins. Finally, we review methods for dynamically monitoring macromolecular crowding in living cells and discuss why their implementation is required for the discovery of new plant osmosensors. Elucidating the osmosensing mechanisms will be essential for designing strategies to improve plant productivity in the face of climate change.
Subject(s)
Osmotic Pressure , Plants , Plants/metabolism , Macromolecular Substances/metabolism , Plant Proteins/metabolism , Intrinsically Disordered Proteins/metabolism , Intrinsically Disordered Proteins/chemistryABSTRACT
Class-I Restricted T Cell-Associated Molecule (CRTAM) is a protein that is expressed after T cell activation. The interaction of CRTAM with its ligand, nectin-like 2 (Necl2), is required for the efficient production of IL-17, IL-22, and IFNγ by murine CD4 T cells, and it plays a role in optimal CD8 T and NK cell cytotoxicity. CRTAM promotes the pro-inflammatory cytokine profile; therefore, it may take part in the immunopathology of autoimmune diseases such as diabetes type 1 or colitis. Thus, antibodies that block the interaction between CRTAM and Necl2 would be useful for controlling the production of these inflammatory cytokines. In this work, using bioinformatics predictions, we identified three short disordered epitopes (sDE1-3) that are located in the Ig-like domains of murine CRTAM and are conserved in mammalian species. We performed a structural analysis by molecular dynamics simulations of sDE1 (QHPALKSSKY, Ig-like V), sDE2 (QRNGEKSVVK, Ig-like C1), and sDE3 (CSTERSKKPPPQI, Ig-like C1). sDE1, which is located within a loop of the contact interface of the heterotypic interaction with Nectl2, undergoes an order-disorder transition. On the contrary, even though sDE2 and sDE3 are flexible and also located within loops, they do not undergo order-disorder transitions. We evaluated the immunogenicity of sDE1 and sDE3 through the expression of these epitopes in chimeric L1 virus-like particles. We confirmed that sDE1 induces polyclonal antibodies that recognize the native folding of CRTAM expressed in activated murine CD4 T cells. In contrast, sDE3 induces polyclonal antibodies that recognize the recombinant protein hCRTAM-Fc, but not the native CRTAM. Thus, in this study, an exposed disordered epitope in the Ig-like V domain of CRTAM was identified as a potential site for therapeutic antibodies.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Blocking/metabolism , Cell Adhesion Molecule-1/metabolism , Epitopes/immunology , Immunoglobulins/immunology , Animals , Antibodies/immunology , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Cells, Cultured , Lymphocyte Activation , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Protein Binding , RabbitsABSTRACT
The Golgi complex is part of the endomembrane system and is responsible for receiving transport cargos from the endoplasmic reticulum and for sorting and targeting them to their final destination. To perform its function in higher eukaryotic cells, the Golgi needs to be correctly assembled as a flattened membrane sandwich kept together by a protein matrix. The precise mechanism controlling the Golgi cisternae assembly is not yet known, but it is widely accepted that the Golgi Reassembly and Stacking Protein (GRASP) is a main component of the Golgi protein matrix. Unlike mammalian cells, which have two GRASP genes, lower eukaryotes present only one gene and distinct Golgi cisternae assembly. In this study, we performed a set of biophysical studies to get insights on the structural properties of the GRASP domains (DGRASPs) from both human GRASP55 and GRASP65 and compare them with GRASP domains from lower eukaryotes (Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Cryptococcus neoformans). Our data suggest that both human DGRASPs are essentially different from each other and that DGRASP65 is more similar to the subgroup of DGRASPs from lower eukaryotes in terms of its biophysical properties. GRASP55 is present mainly in the Golgi medial and trans faces, which are absent in both fungi, while GRASP65 is located in the cis-Golgi. We suggest that the GRASP65 gene is more ancient and that its paralogue GRASP55 might have appeared later in evolution, together with the medial and trans Golgi faces in mammalians.