Compare the Quadriceps Activity between Mini-Midvastus and Mini-Medial Parapatellar Approach in Total Knee Arthroplasty with Electromyography.

Background: The comparison between the mini-midvastus (mini-MV) and mini-parapatellar (mini-MPP) approach in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a subject of debate. The present study compared quadriceps activation, pain levels, and clinical outcomes between the two approaches; quadricep activation was assessed using surface electromyography (sEMG). Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study comprised a total of 78 patients aged between 50 and 85 years with primary osteoarthritis. Patients were divided into a mini-MV (n = 38) group and a mini-MPP (n = 40) group according to the surgical approach. Results: The two groups exhibited no significant differences in sEMG for the vastus medialis (VM) or rectus femoris (RF) at the follow-up time points, with the exception that the mini-MV group exhibited superior strength of RF during extensions at the 2-week follow-up. However, the mini-MPP group had superior Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index (WOMAC) total and function scores at the 2- and 6-week follow-ups. The mini-MPP group also had superior WOMAC stiffness scores at the 2-week follow-up. The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of pain levels or morphine consumption. Conclusions: The sEMG data of quadriceps muscle would not differ significantly between the mini-MV and mini-MPP approaches for TKA. Moreover, the mini-MPP approach may yield superior WOMAC scores when compared with the mini-MV approach.

Minimally invasive medial femoral approach to total knee arthroplasty improves short-term outcomes compared to the standard medial parapatellar approach: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the effectiveness of the medial parapatellar approach via the vastus medialis obliquus muscle in comparison with the standard medial parapatellar approach for total knee arthroplasty, using a systematic approach. METHODS: A computer search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Cochrane libraries, and Web of Science databases to comprehensively collect randomized controlled studies on minimally invasive (MMV) approaches for knee arthroplasty, specifically the vastus and medial parapatellar (MP) approaches. Two authors independently screened the literature based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, evaluated the quality of the included studies using the Cochrane systematic review method, and performed a meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS: A total of twelve randomized controlled studies were ultimately included, comprising 788 knees. The small incision medial femoral muscle approach (MMV) group consisted of 398 cases, while the traditional parapatellar approach (MP) group consisted of 390 cases. Data analysis showed that in the comparison of KSS, VAS, and ROM score at 3 months after surgery, MMV approach was superior to MP approach [MD = 2.89, 95%CI (0.33, 5.46), P = 0.03], [MD = - 0.22, 95%CI (- 0.36, - 0.09), P = 0.001], and [MD = 1.08, 95%CI (0.04, 2.12), P = 0.04]. However, there was no significant difference in the postoperative KSS, VAS, and ROM score between the MMV and MP approaches at 6 and 12 months after surgery. The operation time of the MMV group was longer than that of the MP group [MD = 8.98, 95%CI (4.64, 13.32), P < 0.0001], and the number of days of straight leg raising after surgery was shorter in the MMV group than in the MP group [MD = - 1.91, 95%CI (- 3.45, - 0.37), P = 0.01], with statistically significant differences. There was no significant difference in the lateral support band release rate [OR = 0.72, 95%CI (0.23, 2.28), P = 0.58], length of hospital stay [MD = 0.07, 95%CI (- 0.18, 0.31), P = 0.58], postoperative complications [MD = 0.62, 95%CI (0.33, 1.18), P = 0.15], and intraoperative blood loss [MD = 70.50, 95%CI (- 57.51, 198.72), P = 0.28]. CONCLUSION: Most of the approaches have similar length of stay and incidence of complications compared to standard approaches. However, the minimally invasive midvastus approach has shown potential to improve short-term outcomes. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number CRD42023410583.

Midvastus Versus Medial Parapatellar Approach in Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the postoperative outcomes over a period of 3 years in patients who underwent bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using midvastus (MV) versus medial parapatellar (MPP) approaches. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 2 propensity-matched cohorts of patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral TKA via MV (n = 100) and MPP (n = 100) approaches from January 2017 to December 2018 were compared. Surgical parameters compared were surgery time and the incidence of lateral retinacular release (LRR). Clinical parameters including the visual analog score for pain, time for straight leg raise (SLR), range of motion, the Knee Society Score, and the Feller patellar score were assessed in the early postoperative and follow-up periods up to 3 years. Radiographs were evaluated for alignment, patellar tilt, and displacement. RESULTS: LRR was performed on 17 knees (8.5%) in the MPP group and 4 knees (2%) in the MV group which was significant (P = .03). The time to SLR was significantly lower in the MV group. There was no statistically significant difference in the length of hospital stay between the groups. The visual analog score, range of motion, and Knee Society Score were better in the MV group within 1 month (P < .05), but no statistically significant differences were found later. Patellar scores, radiographic patellar tilt, and displacements were similar at all follow-up periods. CONCLUSION: In our study, the MV approach had faster SLR, less LRR, and better pain and function scores in the first few weeks after TKA. However, its effect on different patient outcomes has not been sustained at 1 month and further follow-up points. We recommend that surgeons use the surgical approach with which they are most familiar.

Mid-vastus total knee arthroplasty for medial osteoarthritis recovers gait balance control better than lateral parapatellar approach three months post-surgery.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) approaches affect recovery outcomes, with different levels of residual loss of muscle strength and functional deficits. The current study compared the gait balance control in older individuals 3 months after TKA via the lateral parapatellar approach (LPPA) and mid-vastus approach (MVA) in terms of the inclination angle (IA) of the center of pressure (COP) to the body's center of mass (COM) vector, and the rate of change of IA (RCIA). In a gait laboratory, 12 patients with severe medial knee osteoarthritis who had undergone bilateral TKA via LPPA and 12 via MVA were evaluated and compared against 12 healthy controls for their balance control during gait 3 months after surgery. The participants' kinematic data and ground reaction forces were measured synchronously using an 8-camera motion capture system and three forceplates, respectively, from which the COM, COP, IA and RCIA were calculated using a 13-body-segment model. The LPPA group showed significantly greater sagittal IA during DLS (p < 0.01) but less sagittal and frontal RCIA throughout the gait cycle (p < 0.04) compared to controls. The MVA showed better recovery in the balance control with most IA and RCIA variables similar to those of the healthy controls throughout the gait cycle. The patients with LPPA walked with a compromised balance control throughout the gait cycle while the MVA group showed close-to-normal balance control with a slight decrease in sagittal RCIA during SLS. The current between-approach findings were likely related to the differences in the muscles involved during surgery, suggesting that MVA may be a better choice than LPPA when taking short-term gait balance control into consideration.

Long-term study of functional outcomes of robotic assisted medial UKA using mid-vastus approach in a high-volume centre.

Robotic UKA is one of the recent advancement in surgical management for medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. Over the years, there have been many studies which have showed results of various conventional UKA, high tibial osteotomy and even robotic uka for medial OA of knee all over the world. But still there is very less work on long-term outcome-based analysis of functional outcomes of robotic assisted medial UKA using mid-vastus approach, which was the aim of the study. A total of 680 patients with medial OA knee that were undergone robotic assisted UKA. The study was done at tertiary teaching institute and hospital from November 2016 to October 2022. The assessment of pain, clinical-functional assessment, walking ability, range of motion were assessed by KSS, SF-12 at pre-operatively, mid-term follow-ups and at final follow-up -5.03(± 0.52) years after surgery. 680 patients suited for medial UKA in our study with mean age of 65 ± 10.6 years. Average operating time was 42 ± 4.7 min. The mean postoperative KSS was 93 ± 4.3, the mean SF-12 was 49 ± 9.1, 55 ± 8.7 for PS and MS, respectively. The patient had better KSS and SF-12 when compared pre-operatively and final follow-up (p -0.012 and -9.320, p -0.017 and -7.475, p -0.014 and -5.196, p -0.021 and -7.418, respectively). Complications were also very less. Robotic UKA using mid-vastus approach is effective treatment for medial compartmental OA knee. On short/long-term follow-up of patients, functional and radiological outcomes were good with few complications rates.

A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study Between Midvastus and Standard Medial Parapatellar Approaches for Total Knee Replacement Regarding the Peri-Operative Factors.

Introduction The aim of this study was to determine whether the midvastus (MV) approach in patients who underwent total knee replacement (TKR) results in differences regarding peri-operative parameters, such as surgical time, blood loss, transfusion need and complications, when compared with medial parapatellar approach (MP). Methods This was a prospective randomized comparative study of patients who received primary TKR. The first group consisted of patients where the MP approach was used and the second those where the MV approach was utilized. Patient's age, body mass index (BMI), stage of osteoarthritis (OA), prosthesis design, duration of surgery, blood loss in the drainage, hemoglobin (Hb), and intra-operative complications were recorded. Results From December 2019 to June 2020 a total of 107 (22 males, 85 females) and 38 (seven males, 31 females) patients were operated on with the MP and MV approaches, respectively. The two groups did not differ in terms of age, BMI, gender and stage of OA, however, pre-operative haemoglobin (Hb) was higher in the MP group [mean 13,5 (1.3) versus 13.1 (0.73)]. There was no significant difference in Hb decline pre- and post-operatively and in drain volume between groups. The mean Hb drop was similar for the MP [-2.2 (1.08)] and MV [-2.52 (1.06)] groups, and even though the transfusion rates were lower for the MP group, it did not reach significance. The duration of surgery was significantly longer in the MV group, with a mean time of 95.6 (12.94) minutes versus 89.4 (14.28) in the MP group. Overall complications did not differ significantly among the two surgical approaches. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that pre-operative Hb [OR 2.6 95% CI (1.43, 4.75)] and approach [OR 4.15 95% CI (1.15, 14.98)] were significantly correlated with the need for transfusion when gender, BMI, redon drainage, prosthesis size and duration of surgery were considered together. Conclusion In our experience, total knee replacement performed with either the midvastus or medial parapatellar approach does not result in any advantage with regards to the intra-operative complications, drain blood volume or difference in Hb drop post-operative. However, the midvastus approach presents a longer operation time, with the risk of higher transfusion rates for the patients.

Effects of Surgical Approach and Tourniquet Use on Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.

Introduction: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most successful procedures for the treatment of severe knee osteoarthritis. Various surgical approaches have been investigated in the hopes of improving postoperative outcomes. Two include the medial parapatellar (standard) and midvastus. As the midvastus approach does not disrupt the extensor mechanism, it may be advantageous for functional recovery, however length of stay and long-term function are similar between approaches. Tourniquet use during TKA has conflicting results in the literature. We hypothesized that a future trial comparing outpatient versus standard TKA could appropriately use either surgical approach with or without a tourniquet. Therefore, the objective of this pilot randomized trial was to compare postoperative pain, function, quality of life, and satisfaction between patients who underwent a medial parapatellar or midvastus approach for TKA ± tourniquet use. Methods: We conducted a randomized trial with a two-by-two factorial design to compare the medial parapatellar to the midvastus surgical approach for TKA ± tourniquet use. The Short Form-12 (SF-12), Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Knee Society Score (KSS) were collected at baseline, postoperatively at two, six, 12 weeks, and one year. Results: Eighty-three patients were included. Postoperative WOMAC scores were statistically but not clinically higher at six weeks and three months in favour of no tourniquet use. There were no differences in postoperative WOMAC scores between approaches. Short Form-12 and KSS scores increased in both groups with no significant differences postoperatively (p > 0.05). Conclusion: There were no clinically significant differences in postoperative pain, function, quality of life, or satisfaction between surgical approaches or whether a tourniquet was used. As such, both surgical approaches ± tourniquet use are safe and reliable. We believe a future larger randomized trial could likely incorporate either surgical approach or tourniquet preferences without significant impact on patient reported outcomes.

Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols in total knee arthroplasty via midvastus approach: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols were rapidly adopted in many surgeries such as fast-track arthroplasty. The study aimed to investigate the impact of ERAS protocols on the clinical effect of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) via the midvastus approach. METHODS: A total of 69 patients who underwent primary unilateral TKA via the midvastus approach from October 2018 to June 2019 were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups: ERAS group and Control group. The ERAS protocols were adopted for the ERAS group and consisted of pure juice drinking 2 h before the surgery, optimization of the preoperative anesthesia plan, phased use of tourniquets, and the use of tranexamic acid as well as a drug cocktail. The operative time, first postoperative walking time, first straight leg elevation time, postoperative hospitalization time, visual analogue scale score (VAS score), Hospital for Special Surgery score (HSS score), conventional Knee Society score (KSS), and knee range of motion (ROM) were used to assess the clinical effects in the two groups. All the included patients were followed up for 12 months. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the basic demographic information and operation time between the ERAS and Control groups (P > 0.05). The first postoperative walking time (2.11 ± 0.11 h) and first postoperative straight leg elevation time (6.14 ± 1.73 h) in the ERAS group were significantly earlier than those in the Control group (P < 0.001) and the postoperative hospitalization time was significantly shorter (3.11 ± 0.32 days). The postoperative mean VAS scores in both groups were significantly reduced compared with those before surgery (P < 0.001). The VAS scores for the ERAS group were significantly lower than those for the Control group at 1, 2, and 7 days after surgery (P < 0.001). The mean HSS scores, KSS, and knee ROM were significantly increased in both the ERAS and Control groups at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery (P < 0.001). In addition, the HSS scores, KSS, and knee ROM in the ERAS group were significantly higher than those in the Control group at 1 month after surgery (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ERAS protocols improved the clinical effects of TKA via the midvastus approach, facilitating early out-of-bed activity and comfortable postoperative rehabilitation exercise, and further increasing patient satisfaction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04873544 .

Mini-midvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty: difference in patient-reported outcomes measured with the Forgotten Joint Score.

BACKGROUND: Low knee awareness after minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has become the ultimate target of a natural-feeling knee that meets patient expectations. The objective of this research was to compare the clinical outcomes of TKA via the mini-midvastus (MMV) approach or the medial parapatellar (MPP) approach, and to evaluate which approach can lead to a better quality of life after surgery. METHODS: From January 2015 to December 2016, a retrospective cohort study was conducted in 330 patients who underwent TKA via a mini-midvastus (MMV) approach. During this period, we also selected 330 patients who underwent TKA via a medial parapatellar (MPP) approach (MPP group) for comparison. Clinical results were assessed with the visual analog scale score for pain, range of motion, and the Knee Society Score. The Forgotten Joint Score was used to analyze the ability to forget the joint. RESULTS: There were significant differences with regard to visual analog scale score, range of motion, and the Knee Society Score until 6 months after surgery between the MMV and MPP groups (p < 0.05), but the differences were not significant at 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months after surgery. However, there were significant differences in the Forgotten Joint Score between the groups during the follow-up period (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: When forgetting the artificial joint after TKA is the ultimate target, better quality of life can be acquired by performing TKA via the MMV approach. In addition, compared with the MPP approach, the MMV approach can offer less pain and a faster recovery.

Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does Surgical Technique Actually Impact the Outcome?

A surgical approach to total knee arthroplasty has been at the forefront of many conversations. Surgeons used the medial parapatellar approach for its familiarity of anatomy, reliability, and ability to convert to a more extensile approach. This article reviews the current literature and information regarding the effect of surgical approach on patients' outcomes. The results of the limited medial parapatellar, subvastus, midvastus, and quadriceps-sparing approaches were analyzed. All techniques can provide adequate exposure with successful outcomes. It is recommended that a surgeon perform the approach with which they are most comfortable, because that will likely yield the best patient outcome.

Better outcomes after mini-subvastus approach for primary total knee arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Alternatives to the classical medial parapatellar (MPP) approach for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) include the mini-medial parapatellar (MMPP), mini-subvastus (MSV), mini-midvastus (MMV) and quadriceps-sparing (QS) approaches. The best approach has been not fully clarified. The purpose of the present study was to conduct a Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing these approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present analysis was carried out according to the PRISMA extension statement for reporting systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of healthcare interventions. The databases search was performed in October 2019. All clinical trials comparing two or more approaches for primary TKA were considered for inclusion. The baseline comparability was evaluated through the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. The statistical analysis was performed through the STATA software/MP. A Bayesian hierarchical random-effects model analysis was adopted in all the comparisons. RESULTS: Data from 52 articles (4533 patients) were collected. The mean follow-up was 20.38 months. With regard to diagnosis, gender, age and BMI, adequate baseline comparability was detected. The MSV approach ranked better concerning clinical scores (the lowest visual analogic scale, the higher KSS and KSFS) and functional outcomes (the shortest straight leg raise, the greatest degree of flexion and range of motion). Concerning perioperative data, the MSV evidenced the shortest hospital stay, while the MPP the shortest surgical duration and lowest estimated blood loss. CONCLUSION: According to the main findings of the present study, the mini-subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty demonstrated superior overall compared to the other approaches. Orthopaedic surgeons should consider this approach in the light of the evidence and limitations of this Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Comparable outcomes in mini-midvastus versus mini-medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques in total knee arthroplasties (TKA) have gained popularity over conventional techniques due to benefits of hastened recovery and reduced complications. There are a variety of MIS techniques available and two most common techniques currently employed are the mini-midvastus (mMV) and mini-medial parapatellar (mMPP) approaches. This meta-analysis aims to compare the clinical outcomes and peri-operative parameters between mMV and mMPP in TKA in order to determine the presence of a superior technique. METHODS: A multi-database search was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Data from studies comparing clinical outcomes and peri-operative parameters between mMV and mMPP approaches in TKA were extracted and analysed. RESULTS: A total of five randomized controlled trials were included for analysis, consisting of 190 mMV and 189 mMPP knees. Clinically unimportant differences were noted in blood loss and surgical time between the groups (5 mL less blood loss and 7 min less surgical time in mMV, P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between both groups for Knee Society Score at 1 and 2 years, range of motion at 1 and 2 years, incision length or incidence of lateral retinacular release (all non-significant, P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The mMV and mMPP MIS TKA approaches have equivalent clinical outcomes. Despite a statistically significant longer operative time and higher mean blood loss in mMV than mMPP approach, clinically significant difference was not demonstrated. Both mMV and mMPP MIS techniques are reliable and safe to perform in TKA.

Total knee arthroplasty through a midvastus approach reduces postoperative adverse reactions and accelerates functional recovery of the knee / 中国组织工程研究

BACKGROUND: Medial parapatellar approach has become the standard technique for total knee arthroplasty. However, recent studies have reported superior results in functional recovery using midvastus approach. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the early functional outcomes of medial parapatellar and midvastus approaches. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, and controlled trial. Fifty patients receiving total knee arthroplasty were randomized into two groups: medial parapatellar approach and midvastus approach. The same type of implants was used in both groups. The Visual Analogue Scale scores were recorded. The range of motion, quadriceps strength and proprioception were assessed at 3 and 6 weeks after surgery. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) The Visual Analogue Scale scores at rest and in active in the midvastus approach group were significantly lower than those in the medial parapatellar approach group. (2) The average quadriceps strength in the midvastus approach group was significantly better than that in the medial parapatellar approach group. (3) The postoperative quadriceps proprioception in the midvastus approach group was better than that in the medial parapatellar approach group. The range of motion was similar in both groups. (4) Therefore, during early rehabilitation, the midvastus approach is superior to the medial parapatellar approach, and no adverse effects associated with this method are observed.

Structured Total Knee Replacement Rehabilitation Programme and Quality of Life following Two Different Surgical Approaches - A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Introduction: The key important factor influencing the outcomes following rehabilitation is the surgical approach involved in Total Knee Replacement (TKR). Most studies have analysed the functional outcome in comparing the approaches on surgical perspective rather on post-operative therapeutic interventions. The current study was to analyse the effects of structured TKR rehabilitation programme on the quality of life and joint specific outcomes between two different surgical approaches. Materials and Methods: In this double-blind randomised controlled trial, participants were randomly allocated to one of two groups: Group 1- those who underwent medial parapatellar approach and Group 2- those who underwent mid-vastus approach. Both groups received three-phase structured rehabilitation protocol for 12 weeks. The outcome measures of SF-36, knee mobility, isometric knee musculature strength and six-minute walk distance were measured at baseline, on discharge and at review after three months. Results: The quality of life and joint specific outcome scores were better in mid-vastus approach than the popular medial parapatellar approach. The outcomes of knee flexion mobility (p=0.04), knee extension mobility (p=0.03), isometric muscle strength of quadriceps (p=0.001), isometric muscle strength of hamstrings (p=0.03), six-minute walk distance (p=0.001) and Physical Cumulative Scores (PCS) (p=0.03) were found to exhibit significant improvements at three months follow up. Conclusion: The mid-vastus approach was found to exhibit better improvements following structured rehabilitation care, in physical summary scores of quality of life and joint specific outcomes than medial parapatellar approach.

Structured Total Knee Replacement Rehabilitation Programme and Quality of Life following Two Different Surgical Approaches - A Randomised Controlled Trial

@#Introduction:The key important factor influencing the outcomes following rehabilitation is the surgical approach involved in Total Knee Replacement (TKR). Most studies have analysed the functional outcome in comparing the approaches on surgical perspective rather on post-operative therapeutic interventions. The current study was to analyse the effects of structured TKR rehabilitation programme on the quality of life and joint specific outcomes between two different surgical approaches. Materials and Methods: In this double-blind randomised controlled trial, participants were randomly allocated to one of two groups: Group 1- those who underwent medial parapatellar approach and Group 2- those who underwent mid-vastus approach. Both groups received three-phase structured rehabilitation protocol for 12 weeks. The outcome measures of SF-36, knee mobility, isometric knee musculature strength and six-minute walk distance were measured at baseline, on discharge and at review after three months. Results: The quality of life and joint specific outcome scores were better in mid-vastus approach than the popular medial parapatellar approach. The outcomes of knee flexion mobility (p=0.04), knee extension mobility (p=0.03), isometric muscle strength of quadriceps (p=0.001), isometric muscle strength of hamstrings (p=0.03), six-minute walk distance (p=0.001) and Physical Cumulative Scores (PCS) (p=0.03) were found to exhibit significant improvements at three months follow up. Conclusion: The mid-vastus approach was found to exhibit better improvements following structured rehabilitation care, in physical summary scores of quality of life and joint specific outcomes than medial parapatellar approach.

Minimally invasive versus conventional approaches in total knee replacement/arthroplasty: A review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Life expectancy lengthening and aging of population resulted in dramatically increase of patients with osteoarthritis. Total knee arthroplasty is widely used as the gold standard in order to relieve pain, correct deformity and restore function. A contemporary and controversial topic, is that of minimally invasive surgery for TKA. The minimally invasive approaches are based on the concept that they don't violate the extensor mechanism, resulting in earlier functional recovery, shorter hospital stay and enhanced patients' overall satisfaction. The most commonly used MIS approaches in TKA are the subvastus, midvastus and the quadriceps sparing. There is a debate regarding the efficacy and safety of these methods. OBJECTIVE: In this article we will review the current literature (randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews/meta-analyses) on MIS compared to traditional approach and analyse their clinical safety, efficacy and long-term results. DESIGN: Comparison of well-designed studies have tried to demonstrate the advantages/disadvantages, the clinical results and the complications of the MIS approaches compared to the MPP approach. RESULTS: MIS approaches seem to provide advantages in the immediate post-operative period accompanied by increased reports of complications. Consequently, further investigation based on large well-designed studies with long-term results are warranted to further clarify MIS effectiveness/safety.

Surgical approaches in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis comparing the midvastus and subvastus to the medial peripatellar approach.

Subvastus, midvastus and medial parapatellar approaches are the most popular approaches in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the superior approach in TKA still remains controversial. We therefore conducted a meta-analysis to quantitatively compare the midvastus and subvastus approaches to the medial parapatellar approach in TKA. A total of 32 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 2451 TKAs in 2129 patients were included in this study. The meta-analysis suggested that, when compared with the medial parapatellar approach, the midvastus approach showed better outcomes in pain and knee range of motion at postoperative 1-2weeks but also was associated with longer operative time; the subvastus approach showed better outcomes in knee range of motion at postoperative 1week, straight leg raise and lateral retinacular release.

Mini-midvastus versus mini-medial parapatellar approach for minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: outcomes pendulum is at equilibrium.

Comparisons between mini-midvastus (mMV) and mini-medial parapatellar approach (mMPP) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have reported variable results. We compared two approaches with minimum two year follow up. Forty consecutive patients who underwent staged bilateral TKA were prospectively randomized for mMPP approach in one knee and mMV approach in the other. Clinical parameters (muscle strength, pain, ROM, Knee Society Score) and surgic.l parameters (duration of surgery, blood loss, lateral releases) were assessed at 2, 6, 12 weeks and 6, 12, 24 months postoperatively. Clinical outcomes revealed inconsistent pattern of differences at various intervals. Surgical outcomes were not different. There were no major differences in outcomes between the two approaches. We recommend someone use surgical approach with which they are most familiar.

Short Term Result of Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty with Mini-Midvastus Approach / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: To investigate the effectiveness of minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty using the mini-midvastus approach through analyzing the short-term clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-seven consecutive total knee arthroplasties were performed with the mini-midvastus surgical technique from August 2005 to February 2006 and were followed for more than 1 year after the procedure. All operations were performed with the Nexgen LPS-flex total knee system using a MIS quad-sparing instrument. The evaluation included preoperative and postoperative clinical data, surgical and radiological outcomes. RESULTS: The length of skin incision was average 8.4+/-0.6 cm and the operation time was average 95.5+/-15.7 minutes. The blood loss was average 727.5+/-315.5 cc. The tibial component alignment angles averaged 0.2+/-1.3degrees varus and the tibiofemoral angles averaged 5.8+/-1.8degrees. The mean ROM and the mean HSS score was 117+/-10degrees and 120+/-11degrees, 88.9+/-7.1 and 96.2+/-4.5 at eight weeks and one year after surgery respectively. CONCLUSION: If proper surgical procedures are performed using the appropriate surgical instruments, minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty with the assistance of the mini-midvastus approach, can result in good clinical outcomes and alignment of the implants.

A Comparison of the Midvastus and Median Parapatellar Surgical Approaches in Total Knee Arthroplasty / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: To evaluate the difference between the midvastus and median parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in terms of clinical and radiologic results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January to December 2003, 49 patients having bilateral TKA were randomized prospectivity-one knee having a vastus splitting approach and the other knee having a median parapatellar approach- to compare operation time, postoperative ROM and drain amount, knee society knee score and function score, return to SLR, patellar tilting and displacement. The data was collected during 2 years of follow-up period, and analyzed using paired t-test. RESULTS: The patients with the midvastus splitting approach performed active straight-leg raise sooner (mean, 1.8 day) than the patients operated on using median parapatellar approach (mean, 2.2 days). But, there was no statistically difference. Knee flexion was better at post-operative 4 weeks in midvastus splitting approach group (mean, 125.5 degrees) than the median parapatellar approach group (mean, 123.9 degree)(p=0.028). However, patellar displacement was more severe in midvastus splitting approach group (mean, 3.4 mm) than the median parapatellar group (mean, 1.6 mm) (p=0.035). There was 1 postoperative hematoma and avulsion fracture of patellar tendon in midvastus splitting approach group. CONCLUSION: Even though midvastus splitting approach could provides the advantage of early postoperative rehabilitation, The midvastus splitting surgical approach dose not consider as being superioir to median parapatellar approach due to severe injury of midvastus and limitation of surgical indication.