Educational Value of Surgical Residents Operating as Teaching Assistant.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the educational of value of teaching assistant (TA) cases from the perspectives of attending, chief resident, and junior resident. We hypothesized the greatest educational value of TA cases would be for chief residents more so than other team members. DESIGN: A prospective survey was designed and collected for TA cases separately from attendings, chief residents, and junior residents to assess operative details and educational value. The study period ran from August 2021 through December 2022. Qualitative and quantitative analysis was undertaken to compare answers and discover themes in the free-text responses of attendings and residents. SETTING: Single center, tertiary care institution, Maine Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Portland, ME PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-nine teaching assistant cases were captured from a total of 117 completed surveys that were completed by 44 chief residents, 49 junior residents, 22 attendings (n = 22) and 2 APPs. RESULTS: A wide variety of TA cases were included in the study with the most common reason for performing a TA case being resident request 68%. Operative complexity was most commonly rated easiest third (50%) and middle third (41%) of overall cases. Both junior and chief residents felt that compared to working with an attending alone, TA cases contributed more or much more to their procedural independence >80% of the time. Attendings reported learning something about the resident's skills that they were not expecting in 59% of the cases. Thematic analysis: attendings focused on the steps of the procedure, including the technical aspects, particularly regarding opening while residents largely focused on communication and preparation. CONCLUSIONS: Teaching assistant cases seem to have more educational value for chief and junior residents than attendings. Both junior and chief residents felt that compared to working with an attending alone, TA cases contributed more or much more to their procedural independence >80% of the time.

Robotic donor nephrectomy: optimizing outcomes beyond the limitations of laparoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Robotic donor nephrectomy (RDN) has emerged as a safe alternate to laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN), offering improved visualization, instrument dexterity and ergonomics. There is still concern about how to safely transition from LDN to RDN. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 150 consecutive living donor operations (75 LDN and 75 RDN) at our center, comparing the first 75 RDN's with the last 75 LDN's performed prior to the initiation of the robotic transplant program. Operative times and complications were used as surrogates of efficiency and safety, respectively, to estimate the learning curve with RDN. RESULTS: RDN was associated with a longer total operative time (RDN 182 vs LDN 144 min; P < 0.0001) but a significantly shorter post-operative length of stay (RDN 1.8 vs LDN 2.1 days; P = 0.0213). Donor complications and recipient outcomes were the same between both groups. Learning curve of RDN was estimated to be about 30 cases. CONCLUSIONS: RDN is a safe alternate to LDN with acceptable donor morbidity and no negative impact on recipient outcomes even during the early part of the RDN learning curve. Surgeon preferences for the robotic approach compared to traditional laparoscopy will require further scrutiny to improve ergonomics and operative efficiency.

Student Team Achievement Division as a tool for peer assisted co-operative learning in neuroanatomy.

Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) is a co-operative learning approach premised on a group learning activity that emphazises learning as a social exchange of knowledge between students, in which each student is accountable for his or her own learning and is also encouraged to assist others in achieving their goals. It promotes the cognitive, psychomotor, and emotional growth of students involved in the team. By random sequencing, 60 participants were allocated to interventional group (n=30) and control group (n=30). The participants of the interventional group were subjected to STAD strategy and participants of the control group were instructed to do a conventional self learning on the ventricles of brain. The outcomes were statistically analysed. It was found that the performance of the students is far better with STAD approach than conventional self learning. Our study has shown that Students team Achievement Division can be used as an effective tool for Peer assisted Co-operative Learning in Anatomy. Further studies can be done to investigate the contribution of STAD to teaching other disciplines of Anatomy and other basic medical sciences.

How Do Resident Surgeons Identify Operative Case Complexity? An Analysis of Resident versus Attending Perceptions.

OBJECTIVE: Accurate recognition of patient-related complexity of an operation is critical for appropriate surgical decision making. It is not yet understood whether general surgery residents are able to accurately assess the relative complexity of a given operative case. This study investigates the agreement of case complexity ratings between residents and attending surgeons and explores whether resident-related factors correlate with any discordance in perception of patient-related operative complexity. DESIGN: Residents and attending surgeons rated the relative complexity of completed cases on a 3 point scale via the SIMPL (Society for Improving Medical Professional Learning) operative assessment smartphone app. Additional trainee demographic data, autonomy ratings, and performance ratings were also obtained from the SIMPL registry for each rated case. Complexity agreement was defined as an equal rating between the resident and attending and assigned a value of zero. Over-estimate ratings were assigned a positive value and under-estimate ratings were assigned a negative value. Trends in complexity agreement were analyzed using descriptive statistics and mixed-effects models. RESULTS: A total of 43,179 general surgery cases were rated by 1946 categorical general surgery residents and 1520 attending surgeons between 2015 and 2020. Residents and attendings agreed on case complexity in 63.23% of cases, while the residents overestimated complexity in 13.37% of cases and underestimated complexity in 23.40% of cases. Every level of resident except post-graduate year 2 had similar rates of agreement about the complexity of a procedure, while residents who received a higher autonomy rating were more likely to be in agreement with the faculty raters (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.06-1.19). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that general surgery residents inaccurately perceive the patient-related complexity of a given case approximately one third of the time. Greater experience and operative autonomy appear to be associated with higher complexity agreement. Future research into factors influencing perceived case complexity may provide insight into how to best implement new teaching for surgical residents regarding the concept of case complexity.

Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery Curriculum Concordance: An Operative Learning Curve Trajectory Perspective.

INTRODUCTION: Certification of completion of training in Trauma and Orthopedic (T&O) surgery in the UK requires the demonstration of operative competence in 12 index procedures, achieved through attaining a level 4 consultant-validated procedure-based assessment (PBA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the trajectory of operative learning curves related to PBA performance with respect to operative caseload and training time. DESIGN: Logbook data from consecutive 24 higher T&O trainees were compared with PBA evaluations to determine the relationship between PBA level, operative experience, training time, and indicative numbers. Learning curve gradients were calculated using trigonometry related to operative experience and training time. SETTING: A higher surgical orthopedic training program serving a single UK (Wales) Deanery. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four consecutive higher T&O surgery trainees. RESULTS: Median caseload to achieve level 4 competences ranged from 9 (interquartile range 6-12) for tension band wiring (olecranon or patella) to 101 (61-127) for arthroscopy, with significant variation between all 12 procedures (p < 0.001). Median number of PBAs to reach level 4 competences was 4 (2-6) with significant variation between procedures (p < 0.001). Median learning curve gradients to achieve level 4 competence for tension band wiring were 68.2° and 33.7° by caseload and training time respectively, compared with 12.2° and 45° for arthroscopy, with significant learning curve variation for all procedures related to caseload between first level 3 and first level 4 PBA (p < 0.001). Competence ratios were <1 (median 0.99, range 0.70-2.53) for 6 of the 12 indicative procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Significant learning curve trajectory variance was observed, with discrepancies between indicative operative numbers and the point at which competence was judged achieved. Numbers of index operations to achieve certification of completion of training warrant further examination.