Atrial fibrillation incidence after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention: the prospective AFAF cohort study.

Objectives. Atrial fibrillation is a common arrhythmia in patients with ischemic heart disease. This study aimed to determine the cumulative incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation after percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting surgery during 30 days of follow-up. Design. This was a prospective multi-center cohort study on atrial fibrillation incidence following percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for stable angina or non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. Heart rhythm was monitored for 30 days postoperatively by in-hospital telemetry and handheld thumb ECG recordings after discharge were performed. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of atrial fibrillation 30 days after the index procedure. Results. In-hospital atrial fibrillation occurred in 60/123 (49%) coronary artery bypass graft and 0/123 percutaneous coronary intervention patients (p < .001). The cumulative incidence of atrial fibrillation after 30 days was 56% (69/123) of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and 2% (3/123) of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (p < .001). CABG was a strong predictor for atrial fibrillation compared to PCI (OR 80.2, 95% CI 18.1-354.9, p < .001). Thromboembolic stroke occurred in-hospital in one coronary artery bypass graft patient unrelated to atrial fibrillation, and at 30 days in two additional patients, one in each group. There was no mortality. Conclusion. New-onset atrial fibrillation during 30 days of follow-up was rare after percutaneous coronary intervention but common after coronary artery bypass grafting. A prolonged uninterrupted heart rhythm monitoring strategy identified additional patients in both groups with new-onset atrial fibrillation after discharge.

Early Smartphone App-Based Remote Diagnosis of Silent Atrial Fibrillation and Ventricular Fibrillation in a Patient with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator.

Due to distressing statistics concerning cardiovascular diseases, remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) has received a priority recommendation in daily patient care. However, most bedside systems available so far are not optimal due to limited patient adherence. We report that smartphone app technology communicating with CIED improved the patient's engagement and adherence, as well as the accuracy of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias diagnosis, thus offering more efficient treatment and, consequently, better patient clinical outcomes. Our findings are in concordance with previously published results for implantable loop recorders and pacemakers, and provide new insight for heart failure patients with an implanted cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator.

Prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the 65 or over Polish population. Report of cross-sectional NOMED-AF study.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, characterized by an increased risk of thromboembolic complications that can be markedly reduced with anticoagulation. There is a paucity of studies assessing the total prevalence of AF in national populations. AIMS: To assess the nationwide prevalence of AF in a population of adults ≥65 old and to determine the impact of duration of electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring on the number of newly detected AF episodes. METHODS: The NOMED-AF study (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT: 0324347) was a cross-sectional study performed on a nationally representative random sample of 3014 Polish citizens 65 years or older. Final estimates were adjusted to the national population. All participants underwent up to 30 days of continuous ECG monitoring. Total AF prevalence was diagnosed based on the patient's medical records or the presence of AF in ECG monitoring. RESULTS: The prevalence of AF in the Polish population ≥65 years was estimated as 19.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.9%-20.6%). This included 4.1% (95% CI, 3.5%-4.8%) newly diagnosed cases and 15.1% (95% CI, 13.9%-16.3%) previously diagnosed cases and consisted of 10.8% (95% CI, 9.8%-11.9%) paroxysmal AF and 8.4% (95% CI, 7.5%-9.4%) persistent/permanent AF. The incidence of all paroxysmal AF events as a function of ECG monitoring duration increased from 1.9% (95% CI, 1.4%-2.6%) at 24 hours to 6.2% (95% CI, 5.3%-7.2%) at 4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of AF in elderly adults is higher than estimated based on medical records only. Four weeks of monitoring compared to 24-hour ECG Holter allow detection of 7-fold more cases of previously undiagnosed paroxysmal AF.

Diagnosis and Treatment of New-Onset Perioperative Atrial Fibrillation.

This article reviews medical and surgical risk factors for developing atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common sustained dysrhythmia in the United States. Evidence for assessment and management of patients with AF, including AF newly identified in the preoperative clinic, immediately preoperatively, intraoperatively, and unstable AF, is presented. A stepwise approach to guide anesthetic decision-making in the assessment of newly identified preoperative AF is proposed. Anesthetic considerations, including the potential impacts of anesthetic and vasopressor selection, and current evidence related to rate control and rhythm control via pharmacologic or electrical cardioversion as well as anticoagulation strategies are discussed.

Predicting Silent Atrial Fibrillation in the Elderly: A Report from the NOMED-AF Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Silent atrial fibrillation (SAF) is common and is associated with poor outcomes. AIMS: to study the risk factors for AF and SAF in the elderly (≥65 years) general population and to develop a risk stratification model for predicting SAF. METHODS: Continuous ECG monitoring was performed for up to 30 days using a vest-based system in a cohort from NOMED-AF, a cross-sectional study based on a nationwide population sample. The independent risk factors for AF and SAF were determined using multiple logistic regression. ROC analysis was applied to validate the developed risk stratification score. RESULTS: From the total cohort of 3014 subjects, AF was diagnosed in 680 individuals (mean age, 77.5 ± 7.9; 50.1% men) with AF, and, of these, 41% had SAF. Independent associations with an increased risk of AF were age, male gender, coronary heart disease, thyroid diseases, prior ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (ICS/TIA), diabetes, heart failure, chronic kidney disease (CKD), obesity, and NT-proBNP >125 ng/mL. The risk factors for SAF were age, male gender, ICS/TIA, diabetes, heart failure, CKD, and NT-proBNP >125 ng/mL. We developed a clinical risk scale (MR-DASH score) that achieved a good level of prediction in the derivation cohort (AUC 0.726) and the validation cohort (AUC 0.730). CONCLUSIONS: SAF is associated with various clinical risk factors in a population sample of individuals ≥65 years. Stratifying individuals from the general population according to their risk for SAF may be possible using the MR-DASH score, facilitating targeted screening programs of individuals with a high risk of SAF.

[Silent atrial fibrillation as a risk factor for falls in the elderly.]

Falls increase the risk of injury, disability, and death in the elderly. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the risk factors for falls in old age, however, the relationship between «silent¼ AF and falls has not been investigated. The study included patients (n=131) from 60 years and older who admitted in the City geriatric medical and social center. Previously diagnosed AF was detected in 13,7% (n=18) of the study participants, and «silent¼ AF was detected in 11,5% (n=15). Both forms of AF were associated with a 4-fold increase in the incidence of falls in old age: (95% CI) 4,26 (1,18-15,40) for previously detected AF and 4,56 (1,25-16,66) for «silent¼ AF. AF screening revealed 16,9% (95% CI 6,7-26,8%; p<0,001) more patients at risk of falls. Thus, «silent¼ AF, as well as previously diagnosed, are independent risk factors for falls. Conducting AF screening allows to identify more elderly patients who are at risk of falls.

General population screening for atrial fibrillation with an automated rhythm-detection blood pressure device.

BACKGROUND: Screening strategies to diagnose previously undetected atrial fibrillation (AF), especially silent AF (SAF), in at-risk populations may help reduce the number of strokes. We prospectively assessed the incidence rate of AF, including SAF, using an automated AF-detection capable sphygmomanometer in the General Practitioner (GP) setting. METHODS: This was a population-based prospective study of unselected general population of ≥65 years without prior AF. Participating GPs were requested, in the period February 2018-April 2019, to record all AF diagnoses including those derived from the AF-detection capable sphygmomanometer and confirmed by 12­lead ECG or ECG Holter in asymptomatic patients. RESULTS: Overall, 14,987 patients assisted by 76 GPs accumulated 16,838 patient-years of follow up. The incidence rate of AF was 2.25% patient-years (95%CI 2.03-2.48). AF was more frequently detected in male, older, overweight, and patients with prior stroke, congestive heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. One in four patients had device-detected SAF (0.56% patient-years, 95%CI 0.46-0.69). Age, overweight, and the number of annual visits, were independent predictors of both SAF and AF. In addition, congestive heart failure, mitral valve disease were independent predictors of AF. Due to the interaction between blood pressure and age the risk of AF increased exponentially after 75 years of age in patients with higher systolic blood pressure values. CONCLUSION: We found a higher than previously reported incidence rate of AF possibly by capturing SAF. Our simple protocol might be feasible in large-scale screening for AF and SAF in routine GP care.

Silent atrial fibrillation is associated with P-wave duration index in patients with cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) attacks can be silent, symptomatic, or emerge with its complications in pacemaker-implanted patient groups. P-wave duration index (PWDI), a novel parameter, is calculated by dividing the P-wave duration (PWD) by the PR interval. This study aimed to investigate the relation between PWDI and silent AF development in cardiac resynchronisation therapy defibrillator (CRT-D)-applied patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 181 CRT-D device-implanted patients. Atrial fibrillation attacks that last at least 30 s with no symptoms were accepted as silent AF. RESULTS: Patients were separated into two groups: "with silent AF" and "without silent AF". The without silent AF group comprised 121 patients (mean age: 62.9 ±8.7 years, 62% male). The with silent AF group included 60 patients (mean age: 67.9 ±9.7 years, 60% male). The silent AF group had significantly higher mean age (p = 0.001). PR duration was significantly higher in the without silent AF group (p = 0.001). Patients with first-degree IAB and PWDI values were significantly higher in the with silent AF group (p-values were 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively). Age (OR = 1.073, 95% CI: 1.028-1.119, p = 0.001) and PWDI (OR = 1.053, 95% CI: 1.028-1.078, p < 0.001) were detected as independent predictors for silent AF in the binomial logistic regression analysis. In the ROC analysis, a PWDI cut-off value of 0.67 determined silent AF with 81.7% sensitivity and 51.4% specificity (AUC = 0.701, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: P-wave duration index was significantly associated with silent AF in patients with CRT-D.

Heart Failure and Stroke.

PURPOSE: Ischemic stroke significantly contributes to morbidity and mortality in heart failure (HF). The risk of stroke increases significantly, with coexisting atrial fibrillation (AF). An aggravating factor could be asymptomatic paroxysms of AF (so-called silent AF), and therefore, the risk stratification in these patients remains difficult. This review provides an overview of stroke risk in HF, its risk stratification, and stroke prevention in these patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Stroke risk stratification in HF patients remains an important issue. Recently, the CHA2DS2-VASc score, originally developed to predict stroke risk in AF patients, had been reported to be a predictive for strokes in HF patients regardless of AF being present. Furthermore, there are several independent risk factors (e.g., hypertension, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke) described. Based on the current evidence, HF should be considered as an independent risk factor for stroke. The CHA2DS2-VASc score might be useful to predict stroke risk in HF patients with or without AF in clinical routine. However, there is only a recommendation for the oral anticoagulation use in patients with concomitant HF and AF, while in patients with HF and no AF, individualized risk stratification is preferred. Current guidelines recommend to prefer non-vitamin Kantagonist anticoagulants over warfarin.

How to recognize silent atrial fibrillation in pacemakers and defibrillators-the value of atrial electrograms.

Today's pacemakers and defibrillators include diagnostic tools for detecting and treating cardiac arrhythmias like silent atrial fibrillation as atrial high rate episodes (AHREs). This diagnostic capability is crucial to prevent the potential embolic complications this AHREs are related to. However, sometimes data retrieved from diagnostic counters may be misleading reflecting limitations of detection algorithms, which must follow mathematical rules to classify events on a beat-to-beat basis. The incorporation of stored electrograms has been an important milestone in improving the diagnostic capabilities of these devices confirming the arrhythmia diagnosis.

Silent atrial fibrillation: epidemiology, diagnosis, and clinical impact.

Silent or subclinical asymptomatic atrial fibrillation (SAF) has currently gained wide interest in the epidemiologic, neurologic, and cardiovascular communities. It is well known that the electrophysiological and mechanical effects of symptomatic and silent atrial fibrillation (AF) are the same. It is probable that because "AF begets AF," progression from paroxysmal to persistent or permanent AF might be more rapid in patients with long-term unrecognized and untreated SAF, because no treatment is sought by or provided to such patients. Moreover, SAF is common and has significant clinical implications. The clinical consequences of SAF, which include emboli (silent or symptomatic), heart failure, and early mortality, are of paramount importance. Consequently, SAF should be considered in estimating the prevalence of the disease and its impact on morbidity, mortality, and quality of life. Several diagnostic methods of arrhythmia detection utilizing the surface electrocardiogram (ECG), subcutaneous ECG, or intracardiac devices have been utilized to seek meaningful arrhythmic markers of SAF. Whereas a wide range of clinical risk factors of SAF have been validated in the literature, there is an ongoing search for those arrhythmic risk factors that precisely identify and prognosticate outcome events in diverse populations at risk of SAF. Modern diagnostic modalities for the identification of SAF exist, but should be further explored, validated, and tailored to each patient needs. The scientific community should undertake the clinical challenge of identifying and treating SAF.

Silent Atrial Fibrillation and Cryptogenic Strokes.

A new suspected cause of cryptic strokes is "silent atrial fibrillation." Pacemakers and other implanted devices allow continuous recording of cardiac rhythm for months or years. They have discovered that short periods of atrial fibrillation lasting minutes or hours are frequent and usually are asymptomatic. A meta-analysis of 50 studies involving more than 10,000 patients with a recent stroke found that 7.7% had new atrial fibrillation on their admitting electrocardiogram. In 3 weeks during and after hospitalization, another 16.9% were diagnosed. A total of 23.7% of these stroke patients had silent atrial fibrillation; that is, atrial fibrillation diagnosed after hospital admission. Silent atrial fibrillation is also frequent in patients with pacemakers who do not have a recent stroke. In a pooled analysis of 3 studies involving more than 10,000 patients monitored for 24 months, 43% had at least 1 day with atrial fibrillation lasting more than 5 minutes. Ten percent had atrial fibrillation lasting at least 12 hours. Despite the frequency of silent atrial fibrillation in these patients with multiple risk factors for stroke, the annual incidence of stroke was only 0.23%. When silent atrial fibrillation is detected in patients with recent cryptogenic stroke, anticoagulation is indicated. In patients without stroke, silent atrial fibrillation should lead to further monitoring for clinical atrial fibrillation rather than immediate anticoagulation, as some have advocated.

Asymptomatic atrial fibrillation in patients with atrial fibrillation and implanted pacemaker.

INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation is the most common chronic arrhythmia. Due to diagnostic difficulties, the exact prevalence of silent atrial fibrillation is not precisely defined. AIM: The main aim of the present study was to assess the prevalence of asymptomatic atrial fibrillation and the relation between clinical status and presence of symptoms of atrial fibrillation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty patients with implanted pacemaker with atrial fibrillation recording function and diagnosed paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were enrolled to the study in order to detect episodes of atrial fibrillation. Episodes lasting >1min were included into analysis. Patients were evaluated for presence of atrial fibrillation symptoms. RESULTS: A total of 870 atrial fibrillation episodes were registered, the majority (93%) were asymptomatic. Episodes occurred more often during the day than during the night (p<0.001). Asymptomatic episodes occurred 13 times more frequently than symptomatic (p<0.001). Majority of episodes lasting up to 5min were asymptomatic, while episodes lasting over 24h were usually symptomatic (p<0.001). Furthermore, there were association between silent atrial fibrillation and lower HR (p=0.003), higher percentage of atrial (p=0.01) and ventricular pacing (p<0.001), male gender (p<0.001), presence of atrioventricular block (p<0.003), lower NYHA class (p<0.002), and calcium channel blockers (p=0.033) and diuretics intake (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with bradycardia permanent pacemakers and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, the proportion of asymptomatic episodes is very high. It was observed that shorter duration of the episodes, male gender, lower heart rate, presence of atrioventricular block, lower NYHA class, higher percentage of atrial and ventricular pacing, Ca2+ blockers, and diuretics intake predisposed to silent atrial fibrillation.

When Silence Isn't Golden: The Case of "Silent" Atrial Fibrillation.

Silent atrial fibrillation (AF) is common. In some patients, it is the only manifestation of AF, while in others, the AF may be symptomatic or both symptomatic and asymptomatic. Regardless, however, to date, the significance, detection, and management considerations for silent AF have been incompletely elucidated. This current study aimed to review, for both the current clinician and investigator, considerations and attitudes and the ongoing studies, respectively, with respect to silent AF. The methods used were a literature review and personal trial and clinical experience; the frequency of silent AF, concerns regarding silent AF, methods to detect silent AF, and prospective trials focused on the detection and management of silent AF were considered. The results of the literature search indicated that recently conducted relevant trials, such as PREDATE AF, ASSERT-II, and REVEAL AF, have shown that silent AF is frequent in patients with risk markers for AF and stroke in whom no prior AF history is present, and in whom no pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantations have been previously performed. Furthermore, the GLORIA-AF Registry has reported the observance of more permanent AF and more prior strokes in asymptomatic patients. Ongoing trials such as ARTESiA and NOAH-AFNET 6 are expected to clarify the benefits and risks of oral anticoagulation in patients with silent AF. At present, when silent AF is detected in patients with stroke risk markers, most practitioners initiate an anticoagulation regimen.

New insights into symptomatic or silent atrial fibrillation complicating acute myocardial infarction.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent heart rhythm disorder in the general population and contributes not only to a major deterioration in quality of life but also to an increase in cardiovascular morbimortality. The onset of AF in the acute phase of myocardial infarction (MI) is a major event that can jeopardize the prognosis of patients in the short-, medium- and long-term, and is a powerful predictor of a poor prognosis after MI. The suspected mechanism underlying the excess mortality is the drop in coronary flow linked to the acceleration and arrhythmic nature of the left ventricular contractions, which reduce the left ventricular ejection fraction. The principal causes of AF-associated death after MI are linked to heart failure. Moreover, the excess risk of death in these heart failure patients has also been associated with the onset of sudden death. Whatever its form, AF has a major negative effect on patient prognosis. In recent studies, symptomatic AF was associated with inhospital mortality of 17.8%, to which can be added mortality at 1year of 18.8%. Surprisingly, silent AF also has a negative effect on the prognosis, as it is associated with an inhospital mortality rate of 10.4%, which remains high at 5.7% at 1year. Moreover, both forms of AF are independent predictors of mortality beyond traditional risk factors. The frequency and seriousness of silent AF in the short- and long-term, which were until recently rarely studied, raises the question of systematically screening for it in the acute phase of MI. Consequently, the use of continuous ECG monitoring could be a simple, effective and inexpensive solution to improve screening for AF, even though studies are still necessary to validate this strategy. Finally, complementary studies also effect of oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction, which seem to play a major role in triggering this rhythm disorder.

Silent Atrial Fibrillation: Definition, Clarification, and Unanswered Issues.

Silent or subclinical asymptomatic atrial fibrillation has currently gained wide interest in the epidemiologic, neurologic and cardiovascular communities. The association of brief episodes of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or surrogate atrial arrhythmias which predict future clinical adverse events have been established. Nevertheless there exists a confounding array of definitions to indicate its presence without discrete indication of which populations should be examined. Moreover the term "atrial fibrillation burden" (AFB) has emerged from such studies with a plethora of descriptions to prognosticate both arrhythmic and clinical adverse events. This presentation suggests clarification of diagnostic definitions associated with silent atrial fibrillation, and a more precise description of AFB. It examines the populations across the current disease and cardiovascular invasive therapeutic spectrum that lead to both silent atrial fibrillation and AFB. It describes the diagnostic methods of arrhythmia detection utilizing the surface ECG, subcutaneous ECG or intra-cardiac devices and their relationship in seeking meaningful arrhythmic markers of silent atrial fibrillation. Whereas a wide range of clinical risk factors of silent atrial fibrillation have been validated in the literature, there is an ongoing search for those arrhythmic risk factors that precisely identify and prognosticate outcome events in diverse populations at risk of atrial fibrillation and its complications. This presentation identifies this chaos, and focuses attention on the issues to be addressed to facilitate descriptive and comparative scientific studies in the future. It is a call to action specifically to the medical arrhythmic community and its specialty societies (i.e., ISHNE, HRS, EHRA) to begin a quest to unravel the arrhythmic quagmire associated with "silent atrial fibrillation."

Monitoring Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation.

Although catheter ablation is an effective treatment for recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF), there is no consensus on the definition of success or follow-up strategies. Symptoms are the major motivation for undergoing catheter ablation in patients with AF, however it is well known that reliance on perception of AF by patients after AF ablation results in an underestimation of recurrence of the arrhythmia. Because symptoms of AF occurrence may be misleading, a reliable assessment of rhythm outcome is essential for the definition of success in both clinical care and research trials. Continuous rhythm monitoring over long periods of time is superior to intermittent recording using external monitors to detect the presence of AF episodes and to quantify the AF burden. Today, new devices implanted subcutaneously using a minimally invasive technique have been developed for continuous AF monitoring. Implantable devices keep detailed information about arrhythmia recurrences and might allow identification of very brief episodes of AF, the significance of which is still uncertain. In particular, it is not known whether there is any critical value of daily AF burden that has a prognostic significance. This issue remains an area of active discussion, debate and investigation. Further investigation is required to determine if continuous AF monitoring with implantable devices is effective in reducing stroke risk and facilitating maintenance of sinus rhythm after AF ablation.

Silent Atrial Fibrillation: A Critical Review.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) in the most common cardiac arrhythmia, and is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events. Silent AF is an asymptomatic form of AF incidentally diagnosed during a routine test or manifesting as an arrhythmia-related complication. Although recent trials have clearly demonstrated that patients with sub-clinical AF are at increased risk of stroke, the real incidence of this form of AF is still unknown. In fact, studies about silent AF had been performed only in specific subgroups of patients such as those with implantable cardiac devices, with recent cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack, and recently undergoing AF ablation. Continuous ECG-monitoring in patients without implantable cardiac devices may improve silent AF detection but its cost-effectiveness actually is not well established in all kind of patients. Moreover, recent data have revealed that only a small number of these patients may have sub-clinical AF within the month prior to their stroke suggesting a lack of temporal relationship between the stroke and the AF episode. This paper will review available data on different diagnostic tools for silent AF detection with a focus on their cost-effectiveness, analyzing the direct correlation between the arrhythmia and embolic events, and discussing areas of uncertainty where further research is required.