Sintilimab-induced myocarditis suspected in a patient with esophageal cancer and followed septic shock: case report and literature review.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a prevalent tool in anti-tumor therapy in recent years. They may cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs) including potentially life-threatening cardiovascular toxicities such as myocarditis. Case presentation: In this report, we describe a 69-year-old man with recurrent esophageal cancer who developed myocarditis after receiving three cycles of sintilimab combined with nab-paclitaxel. Despite a rising cardiac troponin I (cTnI), he initially reported no discomfort. He was later suspected of having with sintilimab-induced myocarditis. Although treatment with methylprednisolone reduced his cTnI levels, he still experienced significant discomfort. Moreover, he developed pneumonia and septic shock. Conclusion: In our literature search to identify all reported cases of sintilimab-associated adverse events involving myocarditis, we found 14 patients, including those with esophageal cancer, thymoma, lung cancer, gastric cancer, hepatobiliary carcinoma, and chordoma. The primary treatment for ICI-induced cardiotoxicity is methylprednisolone. However, the long-term or high-dose use of steroids can also induce side effects, which have not been the focus of these case reports. This is the first reported case of asymptomatic immune-mediated myocarditis occurring during the treatment of esophageal cancer with sintilimab. It is also the first to address the side effects of methylprednisolone used in the treatment of sintilimab-related myocarditis. To facilitate an early diagnosis, regular monitoring is required during sintilimab treatment. We should also focus on the prevention and management of adverse effects related to steroid use.

Sintilimab plus GemOx is an effective salvage therapy in patients with refractory/relapsing nodal peripheral T cell lymphomas.

PURPOSE: The retrospective study was to explore the effectiveness and safety of GemOx (gemcitabine, oxaliplatin) plus sintilimab (belongs to the class of drugs known as immune checkpoint inhibitors, particularly targeting the PD-1 receptor) in relapse or refractory nodal PTCLs. METHODS: Patients with nodal PTCL who initiated salvage therapy with sintilimab and GemOx between January 2020 to September 2021 were identified from the database of the hematology department of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine. All patients received 2-4 cycles (3 weeks/cycle) of treatment of sintilimab (200 mg, I.V, D1) in combination with GemOx. Treatment response was assessed every six weeks during the salvage treatment phase. Eligible patients received maintenance therapy according to the investigator's decision. Follow-ups were routinely conducted every three months. RESULTS: 31 patients with r/r nodal PTCLs were enrolled, including 23 PTCL-NOS, 4 AITL, and 4 ALCL. 21 (67.7%) patients received at least two lines of therapy. 71.0% (95% CI, 53.4%-83.9%) of patients documented objective response of 2-4 cycles of sintilimab plus GemOx therapy, including 9 complete response and 13 partial response. 21 (67.7%) patients received consolidation therapy, including 5 autologous stem-cell transplantation and 12 histone deacetylase inhibitors. After a median 25.6 months follow-up, the median PFS was 22.0 (95% CI,11.8-24.7) months, and the median OS was 26.2 (95% CI, 24.4 -NA) months. 29 (93.5%) patients experienced at least one adverse event, and 26 (83.9% patients only had mild (grade 1-2) AEs.Univariable Cox regression showed the progression risk of AITL is 22.7 (3.9- 131.0, p < 0.01) times of PTCL-NOS, while the HR of ALCL was 1.14 (0.33-3.96,p = 0.833). CONCLUSION: Sintilimab plus GemOx showed encouraging activity and manageable toxicity for patients with r/r PTCL.

Transarterial chemoembolization combined with sintilimab and lenvatinib for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) challenging due to unfulfilled clinical requirements. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with sintilimab and lenvatinib in the treatment of uHCC. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with uHCC who were treated with a combination of TACE, sintilimab, and lenvatinib between May 2019 and December 2021 at the Chinese PLA General Hospital. Systemic treatment was started 1 week after TACE was performed. Sintilimab was administered intravenously at a dosage of 200 mg every three weeks, and lenvatinib was given orally at dosages of 8 mg or 12 mg daily, contingent upon the weight of the patients. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) as per the mRECIST. Secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events (tr-AEs). RESULTS: A total of 32 patients were enrolled in the study. Among them, 9 patients were classified as Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer-B (BCLC-B), 23 patients were classified as BCLC-C, 14 patients diagnosed with portal vein tumors, and 12 patients were diagnosed with extra hepatic metastases. The ORR and DCR were 75% and 90.6% respectively, with 4 patients exhibiting (12.5%) complete response, 20 patients exhibiting (62.5%) partial response, 5 patients exhibiting (15.6%) stable disease, and 3 patients exhibiting (9.4%) progressive disease. With a median follow-up time of 19.6 months, the median PFS was 9.9 months, and the median OS was 33.3 months. A total of 31 patients experienced different degrees of tr-AEs, of which 2 were grade 3 tr-AEs. CONCLUSION: The combination therapy of TACE, sintilimab, and lenvatinib demonstrates satisfactory efficacy in the treatment of uHCC with manageable tr-AEs.

Cost-effectiveness of first-line sintilimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for advanced esophageal carcinoma in China.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of first-line sintilimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) from the perspective of the Chinese health service system. METHODS: A partitioned survival model was constructed to simulate quality-adjusted life years and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios over a patient's lifetime based on a phase III clinical trial. RESULTS: Sintilimab plus chemotherapy increased by 0.316 QALY and 0.285 QALY with the additional cost of $5692 and $5269, which led to the ICER of $18000/QALY and $18519/QALY gained in the overall population and the patients with CPS ≥ 10, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with chemotherapy alone, sintilimab may be a cost-effective first-line treatment choice for locally advanced or metastatic ESCC.

Etoposide, cisplatin, and sintilimab combined with anlotinib in successful treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma with lung metastasis: a case report.

Background: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignant tumor that occurs in the adrenal cortex. It has a high degree of malignancy and comparatively poor overall prognosis. Surgery is the standard curative therapy for localized ACC patients. The combination regimen of etoposide, doxorubicin, cisplatin (EDP) plus mitotane has been considered as the standardized chemotherapy regimen for advanced ACC. However, new effective regimens are emerging for specific conditions in metastatic ACC. Case presentation: We report a case of a 66-year-old man diagnosed with metastatic ACC who had a large left adrenal mass (110 mm × 87 mm) and multiple metastases in both lungs. The patient was treated with EP and sintilimab for six cycles; anlotinib was introduced after the third cycle. Follow-ups after the second to fourth cycles found significantly reduced lung metastases with all imaging examinations indicating partial response (PR) status. The patient received maintenance therapy thereafter with sintilimab plus anlotinib. Until recently, the patient's lung metastases and the left adrenal gland area mass (39mm × 29mm) have disappeared, and no disease progression has been observed. The progression-free survival of this patient has been extended to approximately 31 months, in sharp contrast to a median survival time of 12 months for majority of advanced ACC. The main adverse events during treatment were appetite loss and grade I myelosuppression and revealed only grade I hypertension and grade I hypothyroidism. Conclusion: This case highlights the remarkable response of our patient's ACC to treatment with a novel combination of EP and sintilimab combined with anlotinib. Our findings suggest a safe and more effective combination therapeutic option for patients with adrenocortical carcinoma.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line sintilimab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone for unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer in China.

Background: The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) has recommended sintilimab plus chemotherapy (SINT + Chemo) as a standard first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC), based on the proven effectiveness and safety in the ORINT-16 trail. Its cost-effectiveness, however, remains to be evaluated. Methods: We established a partitioned survival approach (PartSA) model with a 10-year time horizon to determine whether SINT + Chemo (vs. chemotherapy) was more cost-effective as a first-line treatment for unresectable advanced or metastatic GC/GEJC. Survival data was generated from the ORIENT-16 trail. Cost calculation was limited to direct medical costs. Database of Hunan Public Resources Trading Service Platform was used as the source for obtaining drug prices. Other cost and utility values were gathered from established literature. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was the primary output. Additionally, we conducted sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and scenario analysis. Results: In the base-case analysis, group SINT + Chemo showed an increase in utility value by 0.32 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at an extra cost of $7988.43, resulting in an ICER of $25239.29/QALY, below the Chinese cost-effective willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $38223.34. Upon further subgroup analysis according to patients' programmed death 1 ligand (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS), the ICERs were $26341.01/QALY for patients highly expressing PD-L1 (CPS ≥5) and $17658.26/QALY for patients lowly expressing PD-L1 (CPS <5). Based on the sensitivity analysis, we found the PFS utility was the parameter that had the most significant impact on the model's outcomes. Moreover, in scenario analysis, the results remained consistent despite variations in the model's time frame. Conclusion: In China, SINT + Chemo is a more cost-effective option (vs. chemotherapy) as a first-line therapy for unresectable advanced or metastatic GC/GEJC, irrespective of PD-L1 expression levels.

Chemoradiotherapy plus immunotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: Research focused on the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to radiotherapeutic regimens in patients with cancer has become increasingly common, revealing promising improvements in efficacy outcomes. In patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), combining immunotherapy with chemoradiotherapy can facilitate the significant prolongation of survival, emphasizing the need for pharmacoeconomic studies focused on the clinical uptake of these innovative treatment regimens. METHODS: A three-state Markov model was developed based on clinical data from the randomized phase 3 CONTINUUM trial and used to compare the cost-effectiveness of chemoradiotherapy plus sintilimab (sintilimab group) to chemoradiotherapy alone (standard group), analyzing outcomes including incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), incremental net monetary benefit (INMB), and incremental net-health benefit (INHB) values at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold corresponding to three times the Chinese GDP per capita ($37 035 per quality-adjusted life year [QALY]). RESULTS: The total costs for patients in the sintilimab and standard groups (QALYs [LYs]) were $92 116 (6.68 [10.03]) and $53 255 (3.75 [5.55]), respectively, for an ICER of $13 230/QALY ($8672/LY), an INMB of $70 021 with INHB of 1.89 QALYs. Using the selected WTP threshold. On the standard WTP threshold, the prevalence of sintilimab group as the primary treatment was 90.55% in China. The establishment of the model is stable. CONCLUSIONS: Adding sintilimab to chemoradiotherapeutic regimens represents an innovative and cost-effective means for patients with locoregionally advanced NPC management in China.

Comparison of immunochemotherapy followed by surgery or chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that the survival outcomes of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) are not inferior to surgery alone in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). This study aimed to compare survival outcomes of ESCC treated with immunochemotherapy (ICT) followed by surgery or definitive CRT and to explore subgroups of patients who could benefit from one treatment strategy. METHODS: Pooled data were obtained from two prospectively registered clinical trials of patients with ESCC at the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. One trial involved treatment with neoadjuvant ICT followed by surgery, while the other involved induction ICT followed by definitive CRT. To balance potential biases, we conducted an overlap weighting (OW) analysis to compare the rates of 2-year progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS), distant relapse-free survival (DRFS), and overall survival (OS). Additionally, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to analyze failure pattern. RESULTS: The median follow-up time of the survivors was 39.3 months. After overlap weighting, the rates of 2-year PFS, LRRFS, DRFS, and OS for patients undergoing surgery and CRT were 61.5 % and 59.7 %, 67.2 % and 69.9 %, 81.3 % and 90.7 %, 84.6 % and 79.1 %, respectively (P>.05 for all). A trend for improved 2-year OS was observed in the surgery group in patients who did not respond to ICT (P=.07). CONCLUSION: The differences in the rates of 2-year PFS, LRRFS, DRFS, and OS between the surgery group and the chemoradiotherapy group did not reach statistical significance.

Case report: A sustained survival benefit of third-line immunotherapy for refractory thymic carcinoma.

Thymic carcinoma (TC) is an uncommon type of thymic epithelial tumors. Patients with relapsed or refractory TCs have a poor prognosis. Immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy can be applied as a second-line treatment for such cases. This study reported a TC patient who did not respond to conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy but achieved prolonged partial remission lasting 17 months following the third-line treatment with anti-programmed cell death-1 inhibitor sintilimab. This patient did not experience any serious side effects associated with sintilimab treatment. The above results demonstrated that sintilimab could be a feasible therapeutic option for refractory TC patients.

Refractory pruritus caused by sintilimab and its clinical management: A case report.

Several immune related adverse events (irAEs) were reported with the wide application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in tumors. ICI-related skin reactions are the most common, which are manifested as maculopapules, rash, pruritus, vitiligo, psoriasis, and lichenoid rash.Among them, the incidence of pruritus is second only to maculopapule/rash, but both often co-exist. The severity of pruritus is mostly mild to moderate and can be relieved after symptomatic treatment with antihistamines. Symptoms are slightly relieved after conventional treatment in patients with severe pruritus, but it easily recurs and eventually develops into refractory pruritus.The patient's quality of life may be affected and may also be life-threatening. We report a case of a patient with postoperative recurrence of gallbladder neuroendocrine carcinoma,who developed refractory pruritus after sintilimab use, which was relieved after naloxone infusion after unsuccessful conventional drug therapy. By analyzing the treatment plan of this typical case of immune-related refractory pruritus after using sintilimab, this report discusses how clinical pharmacists can provide individualized treatment of patients by using their expertise and clinicians' cooperation and complementation in treating clinically difficult cases. This case report may be used as a reference in treating patients with refractory pruritus after the clinical use of sintilimab.

Combination of Sintilimab and Anlotinib for Metastatic Osteosarcoma: A Case Report.

Background: As one of the most common types of primary bone sarcomas in adolescents and young adults, osteosarcoma has a high probability of local invasion and distant metastasis with a poor prognosis. Case Presentation: Here, we report the case of a 34-year-old patient with advanced metastatic osteosarcoma. Considering the high expression of PD-L1 and the inability of the patient to tolerate chemotherapy, anti-PD-1 antibody (sintilimab 200 mg, q3w) and anti-angiogenesis drug (anlotinib 8 mg D1-14, q3w) were administered. The metastatic lesions were treated with local radiotherapy. The patient obtained an 11.7-month-sustained remission period, and he also enjoyed a better quality of life. Conclusion: This case demonstrates that sintilimab plus anlotinib may be a feasible treatment regimen for osteosarcoma patients.

The efficacy and safety of Radiofrequency ablation combined with Lenvatinib plus Sintilimab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a real-world study.

BACKGROUND: The combination of targeted therapy and immunotherapy has improved the clinical outcomes of unresectable hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). However, the overall prognosis remains suboptimal. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel combination of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with lenvatinib plus sintilimab in unresectable HCC. METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients diagnosed with unresectable HCC were included and divided into two cohorts: RFA combined with lenvatinib plus sintilimab (R-L-S group) and lenvatinib plus sintilimab (L-S group). The primary efficacy endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and progression free survival (PFS). Adverse events were analyzed to assess the safety profiles. RESULTS: The median follow-up periods for the entire cohort were 14.0 months. The R-L-S group (n = 60) had a significantly higher ORR than those with L-S alone (n = 62) (40.0% vs. 20.9%; p = 0.022). Moreover, patients in the R-L-S group had improved median PFS (12 vs. 8 months; p = 0.013) and median overall survival (24 vs. 18 months; p = 0.037), as compared with lenvatinib and sintilimab alone. No significant difference in treatment related adverse event (TRAE) of any grade between the two groups. The most common TRAEs of grade ≥ 3 were fatigue 10.0% (6/60) and hand-foot skin reaction 10.0% (6/60) in the R-L-S group and hand-foot skin reaction 11.3% (7/62) in the L-S group. CONCLUSION: In unresectable HCC patients, the incorporation of RFA to lenvatinib plus sintilimab demonstrated improved efficacy without compromising safety compared with lenvatinib plus sintilimab alone.

Sequential severe immune-related adverse events induced by PD-1 inhibitor: a case report and literature review.

In a variety of cancers, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated substantial survival advantages. Nevertheless, the widespread use of ICIs in the clinic has resulted in a growing interest in immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and their treatment methods. This paper reports a case in which a patient with three sequential severe irAEs was successfully treated. After undergoing two regimens of sintilimab in conjunction with chemotherapy for advanced lung cancer, the patient developed myocarditis combined with hepatitis. Subsequently, the patient developed pneumonia following remission from treatment. We also discuss the mechanism of irAEs, principles of treatment, and progress in the study of biomarkers for early prediction of irAEs by reviewing the literature.

Effects of Sintilimab Plus Radiotherapy on Levels of Spondin-2 and Glucose Transporter-1 in Patients with Cervical Cancer.

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the effects of sintilimab plus radiotherapy on levels of Spondin-2 and glucose transporter-1 (Glut-1) in patients with cervical cancer. Patients and Methods: A total of 112 patients with cervical cancer treated from January 2019 to January 2021 were selected in this randomized control trial and divided into a control group (n = 56) and a study group (n = 56) using the random number table method. Chemotherapy using docetaxel + cisplatin was performed for both groups, based on which the control group was given radiotherapy (external conformal radiotherapy + intracavitary irradiation), and the study group received sintilimab plus radiotherapy. The treatment lasted for six cycles, with 21 days as one cycle. Results: The total response rate of the study group was higher than that of the control group (55.36% vs 33.93%) (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in adverse effects between the two groups (P > 0.05). After six cycles of treatment, the levels of carcinoembryonic antigen, squamous cell carcinoma antigen, vascular endothelial growth factor-A, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, Spondin-2 and Glut-1 decreased in both groups compared with those before treatment, and they were lower in the study group (P < 0.05). The survival rate of the study group was higher than that of the control group (87.50% vs 71.43%) (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Sintilimab plus radiotherapy can effectively reduce the levels of serum tumor markers, such as Spondin-2 and Glut-1, and enhance the clinical efficacy on patients with cervical cancer, without increasing adverse effects.

Case report: A rare case of anti-PD-1 sintilimab-induced agranulocytosis/severe neutropenia in non-small cell lung cancer and literature review.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) demonstrate unique advantages in the treatment of lung cancer and are widely used in the era of immunotherapy. However, ICIs can cause adverse reactions. Hematological toxicities induced by immunotherapy are relatively rare. Agranulocytosis, a rare hematologic adverse event associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, has received limited attention in terms of treatment and patient demographics. Herein, we report the case of a 68-year-old male with non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) who received two cycles of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) antibody sintilimab immunotherapy combined with albumin-bound paclitaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy and one cycle of sintilimab monotherapy. He was diagnosed with grade 4 neutropenia and sepsis (with symptoms of fever and chills) after the first two cycles of treatment. Teicoplanin was promptly initiated as antimicrobial therapy. The patient presented with sudden high fever and developed agranulocytosis on the day of the third cycle of treatment initiation, characterized by an absolute neutrophil count of 0.0×109/L. The patient was treated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor but did not show improvement. He was then treated with corticosteroids, and absolute neutrophil counts gradually returned to normal levels. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of sintilimab-induced agranulocytosis in a patient with NSCLC. Sintilimab-induced severe neutropenia or agranulocytosis is a rare side effect that should be distinguished from chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and treated promptly with appropriate therapies; otherwise, the condition may worsen.

Efficacy and Safety of Chidamide in Combination with PD-1 Inhibitor and Radiotherapy for HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Study Protocol of a Single Arm Prospective Study.

Purpose: As one of the most important breakthroughs in cancer therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors have greatly prolonged survival of patients with breast cancer. However, their application and efficacy are limited, especially for advanced HER2-negative breast cancer. It has been reported that epigenetic modulation of the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor chidamide, as well as immune microenvironment modulation of radiotherapy are potentially synergistic with immunotherapy. Thus, the combination of chidamide, radiotherapy and immunotherapy is expected to improve prognosis of patients with advanced HER2-negative breast cancer. Patients and Methods: This is a single-arm, open, prospective clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of the combination of HDAC inhibitor chidamide, anti-PD-1 antibody sintilimab, and the novel immuno-radiotherapy, which aims to enhance efficacy of immunotherapy, in subsequent lines of therapy of HER2-negative breast cancer. Our study will include 35 patients with advanced breast cancer that has failed endocrine therapy and first-line chemotherapy. Participants will receive 30 mg of chidamide twice a week, 200 mg of sintilimab once every 3 weeks, combined with immuno-radiotherapy. Radiotherapy will be centrally 8 Gy for at least one lesion, and at least 1 Gy for the other lesions. We will complete three fractions of radiotherapy in one cycle. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival, and secondary endpoints are objective response rate, disease control rate and safety. Moreover, biomarkers including cytokines and lymphocyte subgroups will be explored. Conclusion: As a single-arm clinical trial, the analysis of the influence of each single treatment is limited. Besides, our study is an open study, which involves neither randomization nor blinding. In spite of the abovementioned limitations, this prospective clinical trial will give an insight into subsequent lines of therapy of HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, prolong the survival or achieve long remission for these participants, and identify potential responders.

Programmed cell death 1 inhibitor sintilimab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, a malignancy that arises in the cells of the pancreas, is a devastating disease with unclear etiology and often poor prognosis. Locally advanced pancreatic cancer, a stage where the tumor has grown significantly but has not yet spread to distant organs, presents unique challenges in treatment. This article aims to discuss the current strategies, challenges, and future directions in the management of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC). AIM: To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor sintilimab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for LAPC. METHODS: Eligible patients had LAPC, an Eastern cooperative oncology group performance status of 0 or 1, adequate organ and marrow functions, and no prior anticancer therapy. In the observation group, participants received intravenous sintilimab 200 mg once every 3 wk, and received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (concurrent conventional fractionated radiotherapy with doses planning target volume 50.4 Gy and gross tumor volume 60 Gy in 28 fractions and oral S-1 40 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14 of a 21-d cycle and intravenous gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-d cycle for eight cycles until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity). In the control group, participants only received concurrent chemoradiotherapy. From April 2020 to November 2021, 64 participants were finally enrolled with 34 in the observation group and 30 in the control group. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients completed the scheduled course of chemoradiotherapy, while 32 (94.1%) received sintilimab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy with 2 patients discontinuing sintilimab in the observation group. Thirty patients completed the scheduled course of chemoradiotherapy in the control group. Based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors guidelines, the analysis of the observation group revealed that a partial response was observed in 11 patients (32.4%), stable disease was evident in 19 patients (55.9%), and 4 patients (11.8%) experienced progressive disease; a partial response was observed in 6 (20.0%) patients, stable disease in 18 (60%), and progressive disease in 6 (20%) in the control group. The major toxic effects were leukopenia and nausea. The incidence of severe adverse events (AEs) (grade 3 or 4) was 26.5% (9/34) in the observation group and 23.3% (7/30) in the control group. There were no treatment-related deaths. The observation group demonstrated a significantly longer median overall survival (22.1 mo compared to 15.8 mo) (P < 0.05) and progression-free survival (12.2 mo vs 10.1 mo) (P < 0.05) in comparison to the control group. The occurrence of severe AEs did not exhibit a statistically significant difference between the observation group and the control group (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Sintilimab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy was effective and safe for LAPC patients, and warrants further investigation.

Efficacy and safety of sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy for recurrent extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a real-world retrospective study.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) no longer are approved for second-line or later treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), and have not been studied in combination with chemotherapy. Exploring the efficacy and safety of second-line or later immunotherapy for ES-SCLC is an urgent clinical question that needs to be addressed, and combination therapies are an important research direction. This study intended to investigate the efficacy and safety of the sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy as a second-line and beyond treatment option for ES-SCLC. Methods: Medical records of patients who received treatment with sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone as a second-line or beyond therapy were retrospectively analyzed. The study evaluated efficacy and safety. Indicators of efficacy included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Safety indicators included adverse events (AEs). Results: This cohort comprised of 46 patients: 24 in the sintilimab combination chemotherapy group and 22 in the chemotherapy group. Chemotherapy received by both groups was either albumin-bound paclitaxel or irinotecan. Compared with the chemotherapy group, the sintilimab combination chemotherapy group had higher ORR and DCR (ORR: 37.5% vs. 9.1%, P=0.04; DCR: 75.0% vs. 40.9%, P=0.04), and significantly prolonged PFS and OS [median PFS (mPFS): 5.07 vs. 2.45 months, P=0.006; median OS (mOS): 14.43 vs. 10.34 months, P=0.009]. Also, there was no significant increase in the incidence of AEs in the sintilimab combination chemotherapy group, which was well tolerated by patients. Conclusions: Sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy is superior to single-agent chemotherapeutic treatment as second-line or later therapy in ES-SCLC patients who have not received prior immunotherapy. These results need to be confirmed in future clinical trials.

Cytokine release syndrome triggered by programmed death 1 blockade (sintilimab) therapy in a psoriasis patient: A case report.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated remarkable efficacy across diverse malignancies. Notably, in patients with advanced gastric cancer, the use of programmed death 1 (PD-1) blockade has significantly prolonged overall survival, marking a pivotal advancement comparable to the impact of Herceptin over the past two decades. While the therapeutic benefits of ICIs are evident, the increasing use of immunotherapy has led to an increase in immune-related adverse events. CASE SUMMARY: This article presents the case of a patient with advanced gastric cancer and chronic plaque psoriasis. Following sintilimab therapy, the patient developed severe rashes accompanied by cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Fortunately, effective management was achieved through the administration of glucocorticoid, tocilizumab, and acitretin, which resulted in favorable outcomes. CONCLUSION: Glucocorticoid and tocilizumab therapy was effective in managing CRS after PD-1 blockade therapy for gastric cancer in a patient with chronic plaque psoriasis.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of camrelizumab plus paclitaxel and carboplatin versus sintilimab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin or carboplatin for the first-line treatment of local advanced or metastatic squamous NSCLC in Chinese mainland.

Objective: Both camrelizumab plus paclitaxel and carboplatin (CTC) and sintilimab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin or carboplatin (SGP) have been approved by the National Medical Products Administration of China (NMPA) for the first-line treatment of local advanced or metastatic sqNSCLC. However, the comparison of the two treatments as first-line treatments in efficacy or pharmacoeconomics has barely been studied. To deeply understand the costs and outcomes of the two treatments, this work directly compared the cost-effectiveness for the first-line treatment of local advanced or metastatic squamous NSCLC in the Chinese mainland. Methods: A network meta-analysis was first performed based on the three clinical trials, namely, CameL-Sq, ORIENT-12, and C-TONG1002, to compare the clinical benefits of the two treatments. The Weibull approximation was applied to further calculate the life expectancy of the two treatments. The partitioned survival model (PSM) was next established, and one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were also performed to evaluate the stability of the underlying parameter values and assumptions within the model. Results: CTC treatment gained 0.68 QALYs and cost $14,764. SGP treatment gained 0.54 QALYs and cost $14,584. The CTC arm gained 0.14 additional QALYs and cost $179 more than the SGP arm, and the ICERs was $1,269/QALY, which was lower than one-fold GDP per capita in the Chinese mainland ($12,734 GDP per capita in 2022). In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, when the WTP ranged from $12,734-38,202 (1-3 folds, 2022 GDP per capita in China), the CTC group had higher probabilities than the SGP group for being cost effective, which ranged from 85.65% to 88.38%. Conclusion: From the perspective of the payers, camrelizumab plus chemotherapy was cost-effective compared with sintilimab plus chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of local advanced or metastatic squamous NSCLC in the Chinese mainland.