Prevalence and characteristics of 11 potentially diarrhoeagenic microbes in asymptomatic individuals in Norway, 2015-2020.

We aimed to estimate the prevalence of potentially diarrhoeagenic microbes (PDMs) in faecal samples from asymptomatic individuals in a high-income country, identify risk factors for carriage and to identify microbial factors that differ between PDMs in asymptomatic versus symptomatic individuals. Samples from 1000 asymptomatic participants were collected, together with a questionnaire, between 2015 and 2020 and examined by PCR for 11 PDMs. Isolates were characterised and potential risk factors were registered. Atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (aEPEC), Yersinia enterocolitica, Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC), enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) and Campylobacter spp. were found in 163 (16%), 20 (2.0%), 17 (1.7%), 12 (1.2%) and 11 (1.1%) asymptomatic individuals, respectively. Other PDMs were rare. Only low virulent STEC, with stx1c, stx2b or stx2f, was detected. Travels outside Europe was a significant risk factor for detecting Campylobacter spp. (odds ratio (OR) 6.99; 95% CI 1.12-43.6) and ETEC (OR 11.4; 95% CI 1.26-102). Individuals ≥65 years of age had lower odds of carrying STEC (OR 0.11; 95% CI 0.02-0.57) or EPEC (OR 0.09; 95% CI 0.05-0.16) than individuals ≤5 years of age. The common finding of PDMs in asymptomatic individuals could have implications for the interpretation of positive findings in clinical samples and infection control measures.

Towards improved point-of-care (POC) testing for patients with suspected sepsis: POC tests for host biomarkers and possible microbial pathogens.

INTRODUCTION: Sepsis is a heterogeneous syndrome often misdiagnosed. Point-of-care (POC) diagnostic tests are commonly used to guide decision and include host biomarkers and molecular diagnostics. AREAS COVERED: The diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of established and emerging biomarkers for sepsis, including procalcitonin (PCT) soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), presepsin, TRAIL/IP-10/CRP, MxA, and MxA-CRP, are analyzed in this review. The clinical utility of the two prevalent molecular techniques for pathogens identification using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays is also presented: FILMARRAY and QIAstat-Dx RP. EXPERT OPINION: The rising benefits of the combined use of POC biomarkers with molecular diagnostics in daily clinical routine appear to outperform conventional practices in terms of reduced turnaround time, timely diagnosis, and prompt administration of the appropriate treatment. Yet, this must be further demonstrated in future investigations. However, the cost-effectiveness of POC tests and the high rate of false positive and negative results, indicate the need for a comprehensive clinical evaluation.

Comparison of three cartridge-based platforms for syndromic testing for respiratory viruses.

Syndromic testing, the simultaneous testing for multiple pathogens causing similar symptoms, has recently gained ground in clinical diagnostics. This approach can significantly shorten time to diagnosis and speed up decision-making, leading to an improved outcome for the patient. Here, we compared three automated multiplex PCR platforms for syndromic testing of respiratory samples in a retrospective study, and assessed their relative sensitivities. The PPA between BioFire and QIAstat compared to ePlex was 98.4 % and 93.8 %, respectively, and 6 discrepant results were observed. The BioFire was identified as the platform with the highest relative sensitivity. Overall, the platforms performed similarly and are all suitable for syndromic testing of respiratory samples.

Comparative evaluation of two molecular multiplex syndromic panels with acute gastroenteritis.

We compared the Allplex Gastrointestinal V/B1/B2 Assays and Seeplex Diarrhea V/B1/B2 ACE Detection Assays in patients with acute gastroenteritis (AGE). Of the total 432 specimens, 48.8% and 54.9% samples were positive for any bacterial or viral target using Seeplex and Allplex, respectively (P = 0.002). The overall percent agreement (OPA) between the two panels was >95% and the lowest OPA was 95.4% for CdB. Allplex identified 40 samples positive for Salmonella spp., while Seeplex and OBC identified only 27 (67.5%) and 8 (20%), respectively. Shigella spp. were detected by assays in six samples, but none were identified using culture. Clostridium perfringens with Seeplex was detected in 70 (16.2%). It remained an informative species in identifying AGE although cpe gene showed only 9.8% positivity. Pathogenic Escherichia coli with Allplex could be detected in 40 (9.3%) samples, which could provide valuable information for the diagnosis of AGE.

A prospective multicentre evaluation of BioFire® Joint Infection Panel for the rapid microbiological documentation of acute arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the performance of the rapid syndromic BioFire® Joint Infection Panel (BF-JIP) to detect bacterial and fungal pathogens, as well as antibiotic resistance genes, directly in synovial fluid specimens collected from patients with acute arthritis. METHODS: The study was conducted in six French bacteriological laboratories. To assess the performances of BF-JIP, results were compared with those of synovial fluid 14-day culture and, in case of discrepancy, with those of complementary molecular methods and intraoperative samples. A total of 308 synovial fluid specimens were tested after collection from 308 adults and children presenting with clinical and biological suspicion of acute arthritis; patients presenting with acute periprosthetic joint infection were included according to the European Bone and Joint Infection Society 2021 criteria. RESULTS: Only one specimen failed (no result). On the basis of the consolidated data, the BF-JIP was concordant with the 14-day culture in 280 (91.2%) of the 307 specimens finally included in the study. The positive percentage agreement was 84.9% (95% CI, 78.8-89.8%) and the negative percentage agreement was 100% (95% CI, 97.2-100%). The positive predictive value was extremely high (100%; 95% CI, 97.6-100%), whereas the negative predictive value was lower (82.6%; 95% CI, 75.7-88.2%), partially explained by the missing target species in the panel. DISCUSSION: The BF-JIP showed high performances to detect pathogens involved in acute arthritis.

Multicenter evaluation of BioCode GPP for syndromic molecular detection of gastrointestinal pathogens from stool specimens.

Acute gastroenteritis (AGE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide across all age groups that disproportionally affects young children in low- and middle-income countries and immunocompromised patients in high-income countries. Regional outbreaks of AGE are typically detected by traditional microbiological detection methods that target limited organisms and are associated with low sensitivity and lengthy time-to-results. Combined, these may result in repeat testing, imprecise or delayed treatment, and delayed recognition of outbreaks. We conducted a multi-site prospective study comparing the BioCode Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel (BioCode GPP) for the detection of 17 common bacterial, viral, and protozoan causes of gastroenteritis with reference methods, including stool culture, enzyme immunoassays, pathogen-specific PCR assays, and sequencing. One thousand five hundred fifty-eight residual, de-identified stool samples (unpreserved stool and stool in Cary-Blair transport medium) were enrolled and tested for 11 bacterial, 3 viral, and 3 protozoan pathogens. BioCode GPP and reference methods were positive for 392 (25.2%) and 283 (18.2%) samples, respectively (P < 0.0001). In this study, the BioCode GPP and reference methods detected 69 and 65 specimens positive for Clostridioides difficile, 51 and 48 for enteroaggregative Escherichia coli, 33 and 27 for enterotoxigenic E. coli, 50 and 47 for norovirus GI/GII, and 30 and 22 for rotavirus A, respectively. The BioCode GPP showed good positive and negative agreements for each pathogen ranging from 89.5% to 100%, with overall sensitivity and specificity of 96.1% and 99.7%, post adjudication. The BioCode GPP detected >1 pathogens in 49 samples, representing 12.5% of the total 392 positive specimens. IMPORTANCE: This study highlights performance of a novel technology for timely and accurate detection and differentiation of 17 common bacterial, viral, and protozoan causes of gastroenteritis. Utilizing molecular tests such as the BioCode Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel may improve the detection of gastrointestinal pathogens and provide actionable results, particularly for patient populations at most risk.

A multicenter evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx meningitis-encephalitis syndromic test kit as compared to the conventional diagnostic microbiology workflow.

PURPOSE: Rapid diagnosis and treatment of infectious meningitis and encephalitis (ME) is critical to minimize morbidity and mortality. Recently, Qiagen introduced the CE-IVD QIAstat-Dx ME panel (QS-ME) for syndromic diagnostic testing of meningitis and encephalitis. Some data on the performance of the QS-ME in comparison to the BioFire FilmArray ME panel are available. In this study, the performance of the QS-ME is compared to the current diagnostic workflow in two academic medical centers in the Netherlands. METHODS: A total of 110 cerebrospinal fluid samples were retrospectively tested with the QS-ME. The results obtained were compared to the results of laboratory-developed real-time PCR assays (LDTs), IS-pro, bacterial culture, and cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) testing. In addition, the accuracy of the QS-ME was also investigated using an external quality assessment (EQA) panel consisting of ten samples. RESULTS: Four of the 110 samples tested failed to produce a valid QS-ME result. In the remaining 106 samples, the QS-ME detected 53/53 viral targets, 38/40 bacterial targets, and 7/13 Cryptococcus neoformans targets. The discrepant bacterial results consisted of two samples that were previously tested positive for Listeria monocytogenes (CT 35.8) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (CT 40), respectively. The QS-ME detected one additional result, consisting of a varicella-zoster virus signal (CT 35.9), in a sample in which both techniques detected Streptococcus pyogenes. Finally, 100% concordance was achieved in testing a blinded bacterial ME EQA panel. CONCLUSION: The QS-ME is a relevant addition to the syndromic testing landscape to assist in diagnosing infectious ME.

Physician-directed microbiological testing versus syndromic multiplex PCR in gastroenteritis.

INTRODUCTION: Syndromic multiplex PCR testing is an alternative to conventional stool testing based on physician-directed request forms. The objective of this study was to compare the etiologic yield of conventional microbiological testing based on physician-directed request forms with that of rapid syndromic testing. In addition, the adequacy of the clinician ordering, which is an important piece of the diagnostic stewardship, was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Physician-directed conventional microbiological testing and extensive molecular syndromic testing with the Fast Track Diagnostics Gastroenteritis Kit were performed in parallel on 1238 samples to evaluate the contribution of a multiplex panel to the diagnostic process of gastroenteritis. RESULTS: A potential causative pathogen was identified in 18.4% of stool samples by standard microbiological testing and in 41.3% of stool samples tested using the syndromic panel. Only 15.1% of the request forms could be considered successful of which 88.2% were labeled inadequate. Conventional physician-directed based testing missed the etiologic diagnosis in 32.3% of the specimens (excluding sapovirus and astrovirus). Bacterial infections were theoretically not missed as bacterial stool culture was requested on all stool samples, but in 28.6% of the cases, no isolate could be recovered. In 36.9% of the samples testing positive for a viral pathogen, no viral testing was requested. In addition, 72.5% of all samples positive for a parasite were clinically suspected by the physician. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that syndromic multiplex PCR assays are a better strategy for pathogen detection in patients with gastroenteritis than physician-directed laboratory testing based on the clinical presentation.

Semi-quantitative assessment of gastrointestinal viruses in stool samples with Seegene Allplex gastrointestinal panel assays: a solution to the interpretation problem of multiple pathogen detection?

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to determine and evaluate the clinical usefulness of pathogen specific semi-quantitative cut-offs in stool samples with multiple pathogen detections. METHODS: The PCR (Seegene Allplex Gastrointestinal Virus Assay) data from 4527 positive samples received over 16 months were retrospectively analyzed to investigate the distribution of the Ct values of each individual viral pathogen. By using interquartile ranges for each viral pathogen, pathogen specific semi-quantitative cut-offs were determined. RESULTS: After a thorough analysis of the Ct values, a well-founded decision to exclude all results with a Ct value higher than 35 was made. This approach made it possible to generate a more nuanced report and to facilitate clinical interpretation in case of mixed infections by linking a lower Ct value of a pathogen to a greater likelihood of being a relevant causative pathogen. Moreover, not reporting viral pathogens with a Ct value higher than 35 led to a significant reduction (p < 0.0001) of reported mixed infections compared to oversimplified qualitative or qualitative reporting. CONCLUSION: By omitting very high Ct values and reporting semi-quantitatively, value was added to the syndromic reports, leading to an easier to read lab report, especially in mixed infections.

Impact of Nested Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay in the management of pediatric patients with acute respiratory tract infections: a single center experience.

Purpose: Acute lower respiratory infection (ALRI) remains a global public health problem among children. Distinguishing the etiology of ALRI is challenging and rapid pathogen identification is critical for optimizing the diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is sensitive, simple, and rapid. Our objective was to evaluate the diagnostic yield and prognostic significance of the FilmArray test for identification of pathogens in pediatric patients with ALRI at a tertiary care center. Methods: A prospective observational cross-sectional study involved 230 pediatric patients presented with acute lower respiratory tract (LRT) symptoms, for whom conventional bacterial culture and FilmArray testing was ordered to aid in the proper diagnosis of the implicated respiratory pathogens. Results: FilmArray Respiratory panel (FARP) was positive in 201 patients (87.4%). The most common detected pathogens were Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), Human Rhinovirus/Enterovirus, Parainfluenza, Influenza A, and Klebsiella pneumoniae; 45 (19.6%), 38 (16.5%), 11 (4.8%), 8 (3.5%) and 6 (2.6%) respectively. FilmArray enabled a change in antimicrobial therapy in 168 (73%) of the patients. Conclusions: FilmArray enables to improve etiological diagnosis of ALRI and optimize the antimicrobial use of drugs in critical care pediatric patients. Clinical correlation is essential to interpret multiple pathogens and resistance genes.

Diagnostic utility of oropharyngeal swabs as an alternative to lower respiratory tract samples for PCR-based syndromic testing in patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Syndromic PCR-based analysis of lower respiratory tract (LRT) samples in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) improves the bacterial yield and time-to-results compared to culture-based methods. However, obtaining adequate sputum samples can be challenging and is frequently not prioritized in the emergency department (ED). In this study, we assess the concordance of microbiological detections between oropharyngeal- (OP) and LRT samples from patients presenting to the ED with CAP using a syndromic PCR-based respiratory panel [Biofire FilmArray Pneumonia plus (FAP plus)]. Paired OP- and high-quality LRT samples were collected from 103 patients with confirmed CAP, who had been included in a randomized controlled trial (NCT04660084) or a subsequent observational study at Haukeland University Hospital, and analyzed using the FAP plus. The LRT samples were obtained mainly by sputum induction (88%). Using the LRT samples as a reference standard, the positive percent agreement (PPA), negative percent agreement (NPA), and overall percent agreement for the most common bacterial pathogens in CAP, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae, were 85%, 99% and 95%, and 86%, 98% and 93%, respectively. For Moraxella catarrhalis, the PPA was lower (74%), while the NPA was 100%. For bacteria that are less likely causes of uncomplicated CAP (e.g., Staphylococcus aureus and Enterobacterales) the results were more divergent. In conclusion, the FAP plus detects the most common CAP pathogens S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae from OP samples with high PPAs and excellent NPAs when compared with LRT samples. For these pathogens, the PPAs for OP samples were higher than previous reports for nasopharyngeal samples. This suggests that analysis of OP samples with syndromic PCR panels could represent an alternative approach for rapid microbiological testing in the ED, especially in patients where LRT samples are difficult to obtain. Divergent results for bacteria that are less likely to cause uncomplicated CAP do, however, emphasize the need for clinical evaluation of positive test results.

Epidemiology of gastrointestinal infections: lessons learned from syndromic testing, Region Zealand, Denmark.

The aim of this study was to investigate the value of syndromic diagnostic testing for a better understanding of the epidemiology of gastrointestinal infections in Denmark. Here we evaluated the QIAstat-Dx® Gastrointestinal (GI) Panel 1 assay on 18,610 fecal samples requested for analysis for enteric pathogens in Region Zealand, Denmark, in 1 year (October 1, 2021, to September 30, 2022). In total, 6905 (37%) samples were detected positive for one or more diarrhoeal bacteria, viruses, and protozoa. The most common bacterial, viral, and parasitic pathogens detected with the QIAstat-Dx® Gastrointestinal Panel 1 were EPEC (in patients ≥ 2 years of age) (n = 1420 (20.6%)), rotavirus (n = 948 (13.7%)), and Cryptosporidium spp. (n = 196 (2.84%)). We identified a large diversity in infections likely reflecting substantial differences in the epidemiology including origin of infections, mode of transmission, seasonality, age-dependent susceptibility to disease, severity, and travel history. All pathogens were detected as both single and coinfections. Viral infections peaked in March with a positive rate of 31.6%, and bacterial infections peaked in August with a positive rate of 35.3%. ETEC, Shigella/EIEC, EAEC, and P. shigelloides were most related to travel activity, and coinfections were frequent. The distribution of Ct values varied significantly between the pathogens, with the lowest Ct values (median 17-18) observed in astrovirus, adenovirus, and rotavirus. Our results highlight the value of providing extensive diagnostic testing on fecal samples for sufficient detection of relevant diarrhoeal pathogens for optimal clinical care.

Comparison of two point-of-care respiratory panels for the detection of influenza A/B virus.

BACKGROUND: Rapid and accurate diagnostics of patients with suspected seasonal influenza or pathogens of the upper respiratory tract is crucial. Fast detection is important especially for influenza A/B virus, so that isolation measures should be taken to prevent the spread of the virus. METHODS: We compared the performance of two syndromic testing methodologies (QIAstat-Dx RP, BioFire RP2plus) against the Alere™ i as the comparator method. Totally, 97 swab samples were included from patients with symptoms of acute respiratory infection admitted in the hospitals of the wider region of Crete, Greece. RESULTS: The Positive Percent Agreement (PPA) of the BioFire RP2plus was 100% (95% CI 87.66%-100%), while the Negative Percent Agreement (NPA) was estimated at 91.3% (95% CI 82.03%-96.74%). This method produced no invalid results. For QIAstat-Dx RP the PPA was 89.29% (95% CI 71.77%-97.73%), while the NPA was 91.3% (95% CI 82.03%-96.74%, 63/69). The BioFire RP2plus managed to determine the subtype in more samples than the QIAstat-Dx RP. CONCLUSIONS: Both panels can be valuable tools for clinicians, since they both display high sensitivity and specificity. We report a slightly better performance for BioFire RP2plus, since it produced no invalid results.

The Clinical Performance of the BioCode Respiratory Pathogen Panel for the Detection of Viruses and Bacteria from Nasopharyngeal Swabs.

Early detection of microbial pathogens causing respiratory tract infection plays a crucial role in clinical management. The BioCode Respiratory Pathogen Panel (BioCode RPP) utilizes reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) in combination with barcoded magnetic beads to amplify, detect, and identify respiratory pathogens. This panel qualitatively detects and identifies 14 viruses, including influenza virus A with H1 pdm09, H1, and H3 subtyping; influenza B; respiratory syncytial virus (RSV); human metapneumovirus; parainfluenza virus 1; parainfluenza virus 2; parainfluenza virus 3; parainfluenza virus 4; coronavirus (229E, NL63, OC43, and HKU1); adenovirus; and human rhinovirus/enterovirus, and 3 bacteria, including Chlamydia pneumoniae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and Bordetella pertussis. Reproducibility, which was assessed with contrived specimens containing 12 targets at 3 clinical sites, with 2 operators at each site for 5 days, was 99.4% for Flu A H3 and Flu B, 98.9% for RSV, and 100% for the remaining 9 targets assayed. A multicenter clinical trial evaluated the performance of the BioCode RPP with 2,647 nasopharyngeal swab specimens from 5 geographically distinct sites and revealed comparable performance between the BioCode RPP and FilmArray Respiratory Panel (FA-RP). Specifically, the positive percent agreements (PPAs) for various pathogens ranged between 80.8% and 100% compared with the FA-RP (1.7 and 2.0). Negative percent agreement ranged from 98.4% to 100% for BioCode RPP. The BioCode RPP also offers scalable automated testing capability of up to 96 specimens in a single run with total sample-to-result time under 5 h. The invalid rate of the BioCode RPP on initial testing was 1.0% (26/2,649). IMPORTANCE Early detection of microbial pathogens causing respiratory tract infection plays a crucial role in clinical management. The BioCode Respiratory Pathogen Panel (BioCode RPP) is a high-throughput test that utilizes RT-PCR in combination with barcoded magnetic beads to amplify, detect, and identify 17 respiratory pathogens, including 14 viruses and 3 bacteria. This study summarizes data generated from a multicenter clinical trial evaluating the performance of the BioCode RPP on 2,647 nasopharyngeal swab specimens from five geographically distinct sites.

Agreement of respiratory viruses' detection between nasopharyngeal swab and bronchoalveolar lavage in adults admitted for pneumonia: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the high diagnostic accuracy of the nasopharyngeal swab (including in intensive care unit (ICU) patients). This study aimed to compare nasopharyngeal swab and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) results for non-SARS-CoV-2 viruses in patients with suspected pneumonia. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed in one French academic hospital on consecutive adults from 2012 to 2018 and tested nasopharyngeal swab and BAL within 24 hours by using multiplex PCR. The agreement in pathogen detection between nasopharyngeal swab and BAL was evaluated. RESULTS: Patients were primarily men (n = 178/276, 64.5%), with a median age of 60 years (IQR: 51-68 years). Of the 276 patients, 169 (61%) were admitted to the ICU for acute respiratory distress. We detected at least one respiratory virus in 34.4% of the nasopharyngeal swabs (n = 95/276) and 29.0% of BAL (n = 80/276). Two or more viruses were detected in 2.5% of the nasopharyngeal swabs (n = 7/276) and 2.2% of BAL (n = 6/276). Rhinovirus/enteroviruses were the most frequently detected viral group in 10.2% (n = 29/285) of the nasopharyngeal swabs and 9.5% (n = 27/285) of BAL, followed by influenza A, detected in 5.6% (n = 16/285) of the nasopharyngeal swabs and 4.9% (n = 14/285) of BAL. Overall agreement was 83.7% (n = 231/276 (95% CI [78.7%, 87.7%])) (i.e. same pathogen or pathogen combination was identified in the nasopharyngeal swab and BAL for 231 patients). Rhinovirus/enterovirus (n = 29/231) and respiratory syncytial virus (n = 13/231) had the lowest agreement of 62.1% (n = 18/29 (95% CI [42.4%-78.7%])) and 61.5% (n = 8/13 (95% CI [32.3%-84.9%])), respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There was a good agreement between nasopharyngeal swabs and BAL in detecting respiratory viruses among adult patients with suspected pneumonia. However, these data still encourage BAL in the case of a negative nasopharyngeal swab.

Clinical Performance Evaluation of the NeuMoDx Flu A-B/RSV/SARS-CoV-2 Vantage Assay.

SARS-CoV-2 infections may present with various symptoms that are similar to those of other respiratory diseases. For this reason, the need for simultaneous detection of at least RSV and influenza viruses together with SARS-CoV-2 was evident from the early stages of the pandemic. In the present study, we evaluated the clinical performance of the NeuMoDx™ Flu A-B/RSV/SARS-CoV-2 Vantage Assay against the conventional low-plex PCR utilized to detect influenza A-B, RSV, and SARS-CoV-2. There were 115 known positive clinical samples and 35 negative controls obtained from asymptomatic health-care workers included in the study; 25 samples were positive for influenza viruses, 46 for RSV, and 44 for SARS-CoV-2. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the evaluated method for influenza and SARS-CoV-2 were 100%. The Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.586 (p < 0.05) for influenza and 0.893 (p < 0.05) for SARS-CoV-2. The sensitivity of the aforementioned assay for RSV was 93.47%; the specificity and the positive predictive value were 100%, and the negative predictive value was 92.10%, while the Spearman correlation coefficient was not applicable for the RSV. Overall, the assay under evaluation was shown to be a reliable alternative for the simultaneous detection of influenza viruses, RSV and SARS-CoV-2.

Impact of Molecular Syndromic Diagnosis of Severe Pneumonia in the Management of Critically Ill Patients.

The impact of syndromic molecular diagnosis in the management of nosocomial infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) pathogens has been incompletely characterized. We evaluated the performance of a molecular syndromic platform (BioFire FilmArray-Pneumonia plus Panel) in patients with pneumonia in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a University Hospital in Greece over a 2-year period. We evaluated 79 consecutive patients diagnosed with pneumonia in the ICU (2018-2020), including 55 patients with ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP). We included 40 control patients diagnosed with pneumonia in the ICU the year before the study (2017-2018). We identified 16 cases of VAP due to XDR bacterial pathogens. We found an excellent agreement (89.4% 76/85 reported results) between the results of syndromic platform and conventional cultures of tracheal aspirates. The molecular syndromic test significantly improved time to diagnosis versus conventional culture (3.5 h vs 72 h, P < 0.0001), and identified new pathogens not detected by cultures in 49% of the cases. However, three cases of pneumonia with targets not included in the molecular platform, were not detected. Implementation of the molecular syndromic facilitated treatment modification from broad to narrow spectrum antimicrobial therapy, resulting in significant reductions in antibiotic consumption in the study group compared to the control group, without a negative impact in patient outcome. The implementation of syndromic molecular diagnosis in critically ill patients with pneumonia is associated with timely and improved diagnosis and has significant impact on reduction of antibiotic consumption. IMPORTANCE The impact of syndromic molecular diagnosis in the management of nosocomial infections caused by MDR/XDR pathogens has been incompletely characterized. We evaluated the performance of a molecular syndromic platform (BioFire FilmArray -Pneumonia plus Panel) in 79 patients with pneumonia in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a University Hospital in Greece over a 2-year period (2018-2020) compared to 40 control patients diagnosed with pneumonia in the ICU the year before the study (2017-2018). Importantly, implementation of syndromic pneumonia panel improved time to diagnosis, identified new pathogens not detected by cultures in 49% of the cases and resulted in a significant reduction in antibiotic consumption compared to the year before initiation of the study without a negative impact in mortality of patients. Collectively, our study demonstrates the positive value of PCR syndromic testing in the management of pneumonia in ICUs high rates of MDR/XDR nosocomial pathogens.

Rapid syndromic testing for respiratory viral infections in children attending the emergency department during COVID-19 pandemic in Lille, France, 2021-2022.

OBJECTIVES: Viral respiratory infections are common in children, and usually associated with non-specific symptoms. Respiratory panel-based testing was implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic, for the rapid differentiation between SARS-CoV-2 and other viral infections, in children attending the emergency department (ED) of the teaching hospital of Lille, northern France, between February 2021 and January 2022. METHODS: Samples were collected using nasopharyngeal swabs. Syndromic respiratory testing was performed with two rapid multiplex molecular assays: the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 - plus (RP2.1 plus) or the QIAstat-Dx Respiratory SARS-CoV-2 Panel. SARS-CoV-2 variant was screened using mutation-specific PCR-based assays and genome sequencing. RESULTS: A total of 3517 children were included in the study. SARS-CoV-2 was detected in samples from 265 children (7.5%). SARS-CoV-2 infected patients were younger than those without SARS-CoV-2 infection (median age: 6 versus 12 months, p < 0.0001). The majority of infections (61.5%) were associated with the Omicron variant. The median weekly SARS-CoV-2 positivity rate ranged from 1.76% during the Alpha variant wave to 24.5% with the emergence of the Omicron variant. Most children (70.2%) were treated as outpatients, and seventeen patients were admitted to the intensive care unit. Other respiratory viruses were more frequently detected in SARS-CoV-2 negative children than in positive ones (82.1% versus 37.4%, p < 0.0001). Human rhinovirus/enterovirus and respiratory syncytial virus were the most prevalent in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a low prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children attending pediatric ED, despite the significant increase due to Delta and Omicron variants, and an important circulation of other respiratory viruses. Severe disease was overall rare in children.

Comparative Performance of the Luminex NxTAG Respiratory Pathogen Panel, GenMark eSensor Respiratory Viral Panel, and BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel.

This study compares three of the most inclusive and widely used panels for respiratory syndromic testing in the United States, namely, Luminex NxTAG Respiratory Pathogen Panel (RPP), BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel (RP), and GenMark eSensor Respiratory Viral Panel (RVP). We compared the three assays using nasopharyngeal swab samples (n = 350) collected from symptomatic patients (n = 329) in the pre-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) era. There was no significant difference in the overall accuracies of BioFire and Luminex assays (P = 0.6171); however, significant differences were found between BioFire and GenMark (P = 0.0003) and between GenMark and Luminex (P = 0.0009). The positive percent agreement of the BioFire RP assay was 94.1%, compared to 97.3% for GenMark RVP and 96.5% for Luminex RPP. Overall negative percent agreement values were high for all three assays, i.e., 99.9% for BioFire and Luminex and 99.5% for GenMark. The three assays were equivalent for adenovirus, human metapneumovirus, influenza A, and respiratory syncytial virus. Increased false-positive results were seen with BioFire for the endemic coronaviruses and with GenMark for influenza B and the parainfluenza viruses. IMPORTANCE Clinical laboratories have multiple choices when it is comes to syndromic respiratory testing. Here, the Luminex NxTAG RPP is compared to the BioFire FilmArray RP and GenMark eSensor RVP for overall and per-target accuracy. As new tests come to market, it is important to ascertain their performance characteristics, compared to other widely used in vitro diagnostic products.

Reduction and persistence of co-circulating respiratory viruses during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

To evaluate the co-circulation of respiratory viruses during the SARS-CoV-2 Alpha surge, we performed a molecular respiratory panel on 1,783 nasopharyngeal swabs collected between January 15 and April 15, 2021, from symptomatic outpatients that tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 in North Carolina. Of these, 373 (20.9%) were positive for at least 1 virus tested on the panel. Among positive tests, over 90% were positive for rhinovirus and/or enterovirus, either as a single infection or coinfection, illustrating persistent co-circulation of some respiratory viruses despite active infection control measures.