Development of an Artificial Soft Solid Gel Using Gelatin Material for High-Quality Ultrasound Diagnosis.

For ultrasound diagnosis, a gel is applied to the skin. Ultrasound gel serves to block air exposure and match impedance between the skin and the probe, enhancing imaging efficiency. However, if use of the ultrasound gel exceeds a certain period of time, it may dry out and be exposed to air, causing impedance mismatch and reducing imaging resolution. In such cases, the use of a soft, solid gel proves advantageous, as it can be employed for an extended period without succumbing to the drying phenomenon and can be reused after disinfection. Its soft consistency ensures excellent skin adhesion. Our soft solid gel demonstrated approximately 1.2 times better performance than water, silicone, and traditional ultrasound gels. When comparing the dimensions of grayscale, dead zone, vertical, and horizontal regions, the measurements for the traditional ultrasound gel were 93.79 mm, 45.32 mm, 103.13 mm, 83.86 mm, and 83.86 mm, respectively. In contrast, the proposed soft solid gel exhibited dimensions of 105.64 mm, 34.48 mm, 141.1 mm, and 102.8 mm.

Single-Use Surgilube® Packets as an Alternative to Ultrasound Gel Bottles.

Point-of-care ultrasound is widely used in hospitalized patients. Hospital-acquired infections attributed to contaminated multiuse ultrasound gel bottles have been increasingly reported, including Burkholderia, Pseudomonas, and Acinetobacter species. Surgilube's chemical properties and sterile single-use packaging make it an appealing alternative to multi-use ultrasound gel bottles.

A Burkholderia stabilis outbreak associated with the use of ultrasound gel in multiple healthcare centres in Montréal, Canada, May-October 2021.

Background: Burkholderia stabilis is a non-fermenting, gram-negative bacteria that has previously been implicated in multiple nosocomial outbreaks through the use of contaminated medical devices and substances. This article reports on an outbreak of B. stabilis infections and colonizations, involving 11 patients from five acute care hospitals in Montréal, Canada. Methods: One sample was not available for testing, but the remaining 10 isolates (91%) were sent for phylogenetic testing. Medical materials and the patients' environments were also sampled and cultured. Samples were tested using pulsed field gel electrophoresis and multilocus sequence typing. Results: The outbreak was found to be associated with the use of intrinsically contaminated non-sterile ultrasound gel. Relatedness of the gel's and the patients' B. stabilis strains was demonstrated using gel electrophoresis and multilocus sequence typing analyses. The investigation was concluded with a prompt recall of the product, and the outbreak was declared over by the end of October 2021. Conclusion: Contaminated non-sterile gel caused infections and pseudo-infections in several patients.

Our clinical experience in pelvic magnetic resonance imaging with vaginal contrast.

OBJECTIVES: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important modality for pelvic imaging. Vaginal distension is provided by the use of vaginal contrast in pelvic MRI, and it plays an important role in staging especially cervical and vaginal cancer. The aim of this study is to show whether the use of vaginal contrast material contributes to the diagnosis in pelvic examination. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between October 1, 2016 and December 30, 2020, a total of 57 patients who underwent pelvic magnetic resonance imaging with vaginal contrast in the radiology clinic were included in the study and evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: Cervical cancer was detected in 38 of the 57 patients included in the study, and when the vaginal pre- and post-contrast staging of the patients was performed, the pre-contrast stage was found to be high in six patients (15%). Eight of 38 patients diagnosed with cervical cancer underwent surgery. When the pathological and radiological staging of the patients who underwent surgery were compared, they were 100% compatible. CONCLUSIONS: The use of vaginal contrast material increases the diagnostic value of MRI in various pelvic pathologies, especially in cervical cancer staging.

Peritoneal vaginal fistula and contrast extravasation during MRI.

Gynecological malignancies including primary cervical cancers are frequently treated with chemotherapy and radiation. Fistulas affecting the gynecological organs and surrounding cavities are a known consequence of radiotherapy due to focal necrosis of the regional mucosa. In this report, we will demonstrate a rare case of a posterior vaginal wall rupture with resulting fistulization into the peritoneal cavity in a 50-year-old female patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix status postchemoradiotherapy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a discontinuity in the posterior vaginal wall near the fornix with extravasation of ultrasound gel used as contrast into the intraperitoneal compartment. Patient later presented with peritonitis like signs and symptoms and was treated successfully with antibiotics. Vaginal gel should be used with caution in patients with prior history of radiation due to the possibility of vaginal rupture which may lead to peritoneal vaginal fistula and contrast extravasation.

Preparation and Evaluation of Polymer-Based Ultrasound Gel and Its Application in Ultrasonography.

Ultrasound imaging is a widely used technique in every health care center and hospital. Ultrasound gel is used as a coupling medium in all ultrasound procedures to replace air between the transducer and the patient's skin, as ultrasound waves have trouble in traveling through air. This research was performed to formulate an inexpensive alternative to commercially available ultrasound gel as it is expensive and imported from other countries. Different formulations with different concentrations of carbopol 980 (CAR 980) and methylparaben were prepared with natural ingredients such as aloe vera gel and certain available chemicals that have no harmful effects on the skin. To justify the efficiency of the formulations; necessary physicochemical characteristics such as visual clarity, homogeneity, transparency, skin irritation, antibacterial activity, pH, stability, spreadability, conductivity, acoustic impedance, viscosity, and cost were evaluated. Moreover, a comparison study was also conducted with commercially available ultrasound gel that was utilized as a control. All samples showed excellent transparency and no microbial growth. S1 was the only formulation that met all of the requirements for commercial ultrasound gel and produced images that were similar to those produced by commercial ultrasound gel. So, this formulation could be used as an alternative to expensive commercial ultrasound gel for taking images in hospitals and medical centers.

The Use of Vaginal Lubricants and Ultrasound Gels Can have Deleterious Effects on Sperm Function.

CONTEXT: Some vaginal lubricants and ultrasound gels are known to be detrimental to sperm function and therefore could negatively affect fertility. AIMS: The aim of the current study was to develop a sperm motility index (SMI) to test the sperm toxicity of ultrasound gels and vaginal lubricants used in reproductive medicine. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Two ultrasound gels (Aquasonic® and Kefus®) and five vaginal lubricants (Vaginesil™, Velastisa®, K-Y Jelly®, Control®, and Durex®) were studied. Three different concentrations (1%, 5%, and 10%) of each lubricant were tested. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: SMI was calculated dividing the percentage of progressively motile sperm in each tested gel by that in the control at 0.5, 1, 2, and 24 h of incubation at 5% of CO2 and 37°C. SMI values <0.75 indicate sperm toxicity. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The main outcome measured was SMI for each concentration and time of incubation. RESULTS: Only Durex® did not show any deleterious effect on sperm quality. The rest of lubricants presented different degrees of toxicity. Vaginesil™ resulted in toxic for all concentrations and incubation periods (SMI < 0.12). Control® and Velastisa® presented toxicity at 10% after 2 h, while K-Y Jelly® showed toxicity at 10% from 1 h of incubation. Regarding ultrasound gels, Aquasonic® showed toxic effects after only 0.5 h (SMI = 0.70 ± 0.15), while Kefus® showed slightly toxic effects after 2 h (SMI 0.69 ± 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: SMI is an accurate tool to evaluate sperm toxicity. One of the main strengths of the article is the inclusion of representative semen samples and known products used worldwide. This study has a relevant clinical translation since it highlights the importance of evaluating the possible sperm toxicity of simple products used in reproductive medicine.

[The Value of MRI in Early Cervical Cancer Staging with Vaginal Filling of Ultrasound Gel].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the value of MRI after ultrasonic gel vagina filling in the staging of early-stage cervical cancer. METHODS: A total of 158 patients with cervical cancer who underwent MRI examination after their cervical cancer diagnosis was confirmed by cervical biopsy were prospectively enrolled. Routine MRI examination was performed first, followed by another MRI examination after vaginal filling with ultrasound gel. Two physicians used a double-blind method to determine the staging of cervical cancer based on the MRI images before and after vaginal filling of ultrasound gel. Results of the postoperative pathology analysis were used as the golden standard. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value for stage Ⅱa cases of the two examinations of the same patient were compared, and the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in identifying stage Ⅱa cervical cancer were compared. RESULTS: Two physicians used the double blind method to determine the staging of cervical cancer based on conventional MRI images, achieving moderate consistency ( κ=0.680). However, for the staging of cervical cancer with MRI images after vaginal filling of ultrasound gel, the two physicians achieved highly consistent results ( κ=0.932). Regarding identifying stage Ⅱa cervical cancer, the positive predictive value of conventional MRI was 66.67%, the negative predictive value was 76.74%, and the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 70.59%, 73.33% and 72.15%, respectively. The positive predictive value of MRI after vaginal filling of ultrasound gel was 90.91%, the negative predictive value was 91.3%, and the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 88.24%, 93.33% and 91.14%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the two methods were compared and the difference was statistical significant ( P<0.05). CONCLUSION: MRI examination after ultrasound gel vaginal filling has better diagnostic value for identifying stage Ⅱa cervical cancer. The method is simple and easy to do, and can be used in routine MRI examination of cervical cancer.

Feasibility of extracts of common Philippine succulents as ultrasound acoustic gel alternatives

@#<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Background.</strong> Ultrasound remains to be an ideal imaging tool for the diagnosis of various conditions in the body. However, the cost and unavailability of the commercial acoustic gel continue to hamper the tool's diagnostic value in low-resource communities.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Objectives.</strong> The study aims to investigate the feasibility of extracts of common Philippine succulents as ultrasound acoustic gel, based on image quality parameters, organoleptic characteristics, spreadability, pH, and viscosity.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Methods.</strong> Aloe Vera, common houseleek, burro's tail, snake plant, echeveria, crown of thorns, panda plant, and jade plant were extracted and filtered before subjecting them for a physical evaluation. The evaluation analyzed the organoleptic characteristics, spreadability, pH, and viscosity of the formulated gels. The commercial acoustic gel was used as the reference gel. Three experienced ultrasonographers blindly evaluated a total of 243 images obtained using the formulated gels based on four image quality parameters.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Results.</strong> The formulated gels had optimal appearance, texture, homogeneity, and pH value. However, all of the extracts had a lower viscosity than the commercial reference gel. The extract obtained from the burro's tail exhibited the highest viscosity among the tested extracts. There was no significant difference in the image quality parameters among the commercial and formulated gels.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Conclusion.</strong> The extracts obtained from the succulents are feasible as an acoustic gel for ultrasound imaging based on the physical and image quality analyses. The tested plants are readily available and easy to produce compared to commercial acoustic gel.</p>

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Special Statement: Reducing the risk of transmitting infection by transvaginal ultrasound examination.

Recent surveys have shown widespread lapses in the procedures used to reduce the risk of transmitting infection via medical devices. Transvaginal ultrasound examination has the potential to transmit vaginal infections, including human papillomavirus. Areas of particular concern are the use of probe covers with high rates of leakage, disinfectants that are not effective against human papillomavirus, and coupling gel from multiple-use containers. We reviewed these issues, and we recommend 4 steps to reduce the risk of transmitting infection. First, during every transvaginal ultrasound exam, the probe should be covered with a sterile, single-use "viral barrier" cover or a condom. Second, sterile, single-use ultrasound gel packets should be used. Third, after every examination, the probe should be cleaned to remove any visible gel or debris. Finally, after cleaning, the probe should undergo high-level disinfection using an agent with proven efficacy against the human papillomavirus, including hydrogen peroxide, hypochlorite, or peracetic acid. Glutaraldehyde, orthophthalaldehyde, phenols, and isopropyl alcohol have virtually no efficacy against the human papillomavirus.

Ultrasound gel as a source of hospital outbreaks: Indian experience and literature review.

Purpose: Hospital outbreaks are observed increasingly worldwide with various organisms from different sources such as contaminated ultrasound gel, intravenous (IV) fluids and IV medications. Among these, ultrasound gel is one of the most commonly reported sources for Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) outbreaks. In this study, we describe our experience on investigation and the management of Bcc bacteraemia outbreak due to contaminated ultrasound gel from a tertiary care centre, South India. Materials and Methods: Over a 10-day period in October 2016, seven children in our Paediatric intensive care unit (ICU) were found to have bacteraemia with Bcc isolated from their blood culture. Repeated isolation of the same organism with similar antimicrobial susceptibility pattern over a short incubation period from the same location, confirmed the outbreak. An active outbreak investigation, including environmental surveillance, was carried out to find the source and control the outbreak. Isolates were subjected to multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) and global eBURST (goeBURST) analysis. Results: Environmental surveillance revealed contaminated ultrasound gel as the source of infection. MLST and goeBURST analysis confirmed that the outbreak was caused by a novel sequence type 1362 with the same clonal complex CC517. The outbreak was controlled by stringent infection control measures, withdrawal of contaminated ultrasound gel from regular usage and implementing the practice of using ultrasonogram (USG) probe cover for USG screening and guided procedures. Conclusion: This report highlights the importance of early identification of an outbreak, prompt response of the ICU and infection control teams, sound environmental and epidemiological surveillance methods to identify the source and stringent infection control measures to control the outbreak. Contaminated ultrasound gel can be a potential source for healthcare-associated infection, which cannot be overlooked.

Low-cost antimicrobial fortification of ultrasound coupling gel: An ergonomic innovation to combat sonology-acquired nosocomial infections.

Background: Recent outbreaks of highly contagious diseases have prompted hospital departments to adopt preventive hygiene protocols. Use of shared equipment, including ultrasound transducers and coupling gels, potentially exposes patients to these microbes. Inexpensive means of microbicide fortification of plain/non-sterile ultrasound gel may be useful in interrupting nosocomial infections. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of low-cost antimicrobial fortification of ultrasound coupling gel in preventing nosocomial infections during ultrasound examinations. Methods: Volunteer patients, 20 in number, who presented for an ultrasound scan in a busy radiology clinic in Enugu, Nigeria, were randomly divided into 2 groups of 10 each and were scanned using plain non-sterile gel and gel-fortified with 0.5% chlorhexidine and 70% ethyl alcohol (in a volume ratio of 20:2:1) respectively. Swabs were taken from the patients' skin, gel-laden transducer, and the cleaned transducer and subjected to microbiology analysis. Subsequently, plain and fortified gel samples were allowed to stand in their respective dispensers for 72 hours. The plain and fortified gel samples were subjected to microbiology analysis. Fisher's Exact Test was utilised to compare outcomes in the 2 groups of volunteers. Results: With fortified gel, swab cultures from patients' skin and gel-laden transducer, and from the cleaned transducer, significantly yielded no growth (P= <0.0001 and P= 0.0001 respectively) while swab cultures from the plain gel yielded a total of 19 microbial isolates from 5 micro-organisms. Conclusion: Low-cost fortification of ultrasound coupling gel with 0.5% chlorhexidine and 70% ethyl alcohol renders it hostile to microorganisms encountered at sonology thus preventing nosocomial transmission.

Shake No Bake: A Homemade Ultrasound Gel Recipe for Low-Resource Settings.

Commercially produced ultrasound coupling gel is often a scarce resource in rural regions of low-income countries that use sonography as their main imaging modality and, when available, may be cost prohibitive. Various homemade gels were created and tested to assure image quality was not compromised. Glucomannan-based gel and guar gum-based gel had superior physical properties in initial testing and showed no substantial difference compared with commercially available ultrasound gel on subject and phantom imaging and analysis (P > .05 using a 1-tailed sign test). Neither gel required heating, attracted insects, damaged ultrasound transducers, stained samples of clothing, or had harmful effects to subjects.

Evaluation of Noncommercial Ultrasound Gels for Use in Resource-Limited Settings.

OBJECTIVES: Ultrasound (US) is increasingly used in settings where commercial US gel is unavailable. This study evaluated noncommercial gel recipes compared to commercial gel. METHODS: A search for US gel formulations revealed 6 recipes. Half-strength commercial gel and a modified glucomannan recipe were also tested. Nine gels, including commercial gel, were tested in Liberia and the United States. In each session, 2 physician sonologists evaluated 9 gels on 2 models, obtaining videos from the hepatorenal space with a curvilinear transducer, the cardiac parasternal long view with a phased array transducer, and the left basilic vein with a linear transducer. The sonologists and models, who were blinded to gel identity, made independent quantitative and qualitative gel evaluations comparing the test gel to commercial gel. Two physician sonologists who were blinded to the gel identities and a US operator reviewed the images and rated their quality. An analysis of variance in repeated measures was performed to test for differences in the overall score, real-time quality, and other characteristics. Post hoc pairwise comparisons to commercial gel were performed with a Tukey-Kramer adjustment. Inter- and intra-rater reliability was calculated for the image review. RESULTS: Commercial gel earned a perfect score. Compared to commercial gel, xanthine gum gel scored highest, followed by half-strength commercial gel. Hot concentrated glucomannan and cold glucomannan gel were found to be significantly worse than commercial gel. No significant difference was found between images based on the gel used on the image review. CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference in image quality was found between commercial and noncommercial gels on US image review.

Outbreak of Acinetobacter baumannii associated with extrinsic contamination of ultrasound gel in a tertiary centre burn unit.

BACKGROUND: During 2011 and 2012, an increase in occurrence of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections was recorded in the Shands Hospital Burn Intensive Care Unit (BICU). An epidemic curve together with strain typing was consistent with an intermittent common source outbreak. An investigation was therefore initiated. AIM: To identify risk factors for A. baumannii infection, characterize the source of the pathogen, implement control measures to terminate the outbreak, and institute preventive measures. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case-control study; reviewed BICU infection control policies, practices and procedures, and patient exposure to healthcare workers (HCWs), and obtained epidemiologically-directed environmental cultures. FINDINGS: Eleven patients met the case definition. On multivariate analysis, case-patients were more likely to have undergone an ultrasound procedure in the BICU (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 19.5; confidence interval [CI]: 2.4-435) or have a FlexiSeal™ device (AOR: 11.9, CI:1.3-276). Epidemiologically-directed cultures of the environment, ultrasound equipment, and ultrasound gel from opened containers on the ultrasound trolley and in the Ultrasound Department were negative for the outbreak pathogen. Culture of an open ultrasound gel dispenser stored in the Ultrasound Department yielded an A. baumannii strain with DNA banding patterns identical to the outbreak strain. CONCLUSIONS: Based on data from our epidemiologic, microbiologic, and observational studies, we believe that inadvertent extrinsic contamination of the gel dispenser occurred in the Ultrasound Department. Contaminated gel was then dispensed into multiuse vials of gel stored on the mobile carts. The outbreak was stemmed by instituting changes in practices in the Ultrasound Department, including introduction of single-use ultrasound vials and storage of ultrasound gel.

Ultrasound probe use and reprocessing: Results from a national survey among U.S. infection preventionists.

BACKGROUND: Improper infection prevention practice associated with ultrasound probe use has been linked to increased infection risk, outbreaks, and death. Although guidelines for reprocessing and use of probes exist, it is unclear how extensively these have been adopted in practice. METHODS: Infection preventionists from U.S. health care facilities were surveyed (N = 358). The anonymous survey had 31 multiple choice, sliding scale, and text response questions. The survey was developed and deployed and the data were stored in the REDCap system. RESULTS: A high degree of noncompliance with U.S. guidelines was identified. Surface probes used in invasive procedures were not high-level disinfected or sterilized 15% (intraoperative) to 78% (peripheral line placements) of the time. Of invasive procedures, 5%-47% did not use sterile gel (same procedures, respectively). Of the participants, 20% were aware of instances where an ultrasound probe was used but was not correctly reprocessed. Extensive breaches of infection control guidelines were reported. The rapid expansion in use of ultrasound has brought clinical benefit but may be exposing patients to preventable infection risk. CONCLUSIONS: Infection preventionists are well placed to act as major drivers of change based on their expertise and experience in the management of infection risk across facilities and health systems. They, along with clinicians responsible for probe use and reprocessing, should review practices relating to ultrasound in their facilities. Where practice does not comply with guidelines, policy and training should be updated to ensure patient safety.