Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 557
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39227548

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Minority communities are disproportionately impacted by COVID-19. In Michigan in 2024, 59% of Latinx residents, 46% of Black residents, and 57% of White residents have received at least one dose of the vaccine. However, just 7% of Black residents and 6% of Latinx residents report being up-to-date per CDC definition, versus 13% of White residents. Drawing from protection motivation theory, we aimed to identify barriers to COVID-19 vaccination. METHODS: Interviews with 24 Black and 10 Latinx Michigan residents self-reported as not up-to-date (n = 15) or up-to-date (n = 19) on COVID-19 vaccines were conducted in 2022-2023. We used a community-based participatory approach in collaboration with 16 leaders from 15 organizations to develop research questions, interview protocols, and methods for data collection and analysis. Thematic coding of interviews was conducted. RESULTS: Findings indicate participants' lack of confidence in the COVID-19 vaccine's efficacy, with those not up-to-date expressing greater doubt. Participants were also concerned about vaccine benefits versus risks, safety, and side effects. Distrust in medicine, confusion about public health guidelines, and conspiracy theories were often reported. Younger unvaccinated individuals cited low health risk as reason to remain unvaccinated. Many participants felt that health education, especially through medical professionals, was beneficial. CONCLUSION: There is great need for more data to make informed decisions given ongoing lack of understanding of the public health benefits of COVID-19 vaccination. Identifying drivers of vaccine uptake, particularly boosters, in communities of color and developing age-appropriate and culturally responsive interventions to increase vaccination rates are of utmost importance.

2.
Vaccine ; 42(26): 126260, 2024 Sep 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39265456

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Minoritized communities in the United States have had higher COVID-19 mortality and lower vaccine uptake. The influence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, initial disease severity, and persistent symptoms on COVID-19 vaccine uptake in Black and Latinx communities has not been examined. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether initial COVID-19 severity, persistent symptoms, and other correlates affected vaccine uptake in a predominantly minoritized cohort hospitalized for COVID-19 during the early pandemic in New York City. DESIGN: In this historical cohort study, we abstracted electronic health record data on demographics, comorbidities, hospital oxygen requirements, symptoms at 3 and 6 months post-admission, COVID-19 vaccinations through November 2022, and influenza vaccinations during the 2018-2019 through 2021-2022 seasons. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios were estimated through logistic regression analyses of correlates of COVID-19 vaccination, on-time vaccination, and boosting. PARTICIPANTS: Survivors among the first 1186 adult patients hospitalized for COVID-19 between March 1 and April 8, 2020 at a large quaternary care medical center in Northern Manhattan. MAIN MEASURES: Uptake of at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose, uptake of at least one booster, and on-time vaccination. KEY RESULTS: The 890 surviving individuals were predominantly Latinx (54%) and Non-Hispanic Black (15%). Most had one or more comorbidities (67%), and received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose (78%). Among those vaccinated, 57% received at least one booster, and 31% delayed vaccination. 67% experienced persistent symptoms. Multiple logistic regression showed no association between vaccine uptake and disease severity or symptom persistence. However, older age and influenza vaccination during the COVID-19 era were associated with increased vaccination, booster uptake, and on-time vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Pinpointing drivers of vaccine uptake and hesitancy is critical to increasing and sustaining COVID-19 vaccination as the field transitions to annual boosters. The association between influenza vaccination and increased vaccine uptake suggests that bundling vaccines for adults may be an effective delivery strategy.

3.
Syst Rev ; 13(1): 227, 2024 Sep 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39237969

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pregnant women, fetuses, and neonates are particularly vulnerable to vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs). These VPDs are associated with high morbidity and mortality among expectant mothers and their fetuses and neonates. Vaccination during pregnancy can protect the expectant mother from VPDs to which she may be especially vulnerable while pregnant. In addition, the passive transfer of maternal neutralizing immunoglobulin G (IgG) and secretory immunoglobulin A (IgA) also protects the fetus against congenital infections and may further protect the neonate from infection during the first few months of life. Despite this, coverage of recommended maternal vaccines remains suboptimal globally, especially in resource-constrained settings. Determinants of vaccine acceptance and uptake are frequently understudied in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and among specific groups such as pregnant and postpartum women. This proposed systematic review will assess the acceptance and uptake of vaccines against tetanus, influenza, pertussis, and COVID-19 among pregnant and postpartum women in LMICs. METHODS: A Boolean search strategy employing common and medical subject heading (MeSH) terms for tetanus, influenza, pertussis, and COVID-19 vaccines, as well as vaccine acceptance, hesitancy, together with uptake, pregnancy, and postpartum, will be used to search electronic databases for relevant literature published between 2009 and 2024. Only studies conducted in LMICs that investigated determinants of acceptance, hesitancy, and uptake of tetanus, influenza, pertussis, and COVID-19 vaccines among pregnant and postpartum women will be eligible for inclusion in the review. The quality and the risk of bias of all eligible full-text articles will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBI) critical appraisal tools. DISCUSSION: This protocol proposes a systematic review and meta-analysis that aims to assess the uptake of maternal vaccines and to systematically appraise and quantify determinants of the acceptance and uptake of recommended vaccines during pregnancy and postpartum in LMICs. A better understanding of these factors and how they influence maternal vaccine decision-making will enable public health practitioners as well as global and national policymakers to design more effective interventions as we look towards expanding the scope and reach of maternal immunization programs.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Developing Countries , Influenza, Human , Meta-Analysis as Topic , SARS-CoV-2 , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Tetanus , Whooping Cough , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , COVID-19/prevention & control , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Tetanus/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Whooping Cough/prevention & control , Postpartum Period , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Vaccination/psychology , COVID-19 Vaccines , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Influenza Vaccines
4.
Vaccine ; 42(24): 126236, 2024 Oct 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39217774

ABSTRACT

Routine childhood vaccination is a crucial component of public health in Canada and worldwide. To facilitate catch-up from the global decline in routine vaccination caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, and toward the ongoing pursuit of coverage goals, vaccination programs must understand barriers to vaccine access imposed or exacerbated by the pandemic. We conducted a regionally representative online survey in January 2023 including 2036 Canadian parents with children under the age of 18. We used the COM-B model of behaviour to examine factors influencing vaccination timeliness during the pandemic. We assessed Capability with measures of vaccine understanding and decision difficulty, and Motivation with a measure of vaccine confidence. Opportunity was assessed through parents' self-reported experience with barriers to vaccination. Twenty-four percent of surveyed parents reported having missed or delayed one of their children's scheduled routine vaccinations since the beginning of the pandemic, though most parents reported having either caught up or the intention to catch up soon. In the absence of opportunity barriers, motivation was associated with timely vaccination for children aged 0-4 years (aOR = 1.81, 95 % CI: 1.14-2.84). However, experience with one or more opportunity barriers, particularly clinic closures and difficulties getting an appointment, eliminated this relationship, suggesting perennial and new pandemic-associated barriers are a critical challenge to vaccine coverage goals in Canada.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Parents , Vaccination , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , Canada/epidemiology , Child, Preschool , Infant , Male , Female , Child , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination/psychology , Adult , Parents/psychology , Adolescent , Surveys and Questionnaires , Motivation , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Infant, Newborn , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Pandemics/prevention & control , Immunization Programs , Middle Aged , Vaccination Hesitancy/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination Hesitancy/psychology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Young Adult
5.
Vaccine ; 42(24): 126271, 2024 Oct 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39226785

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The demand for COVID-19 vaccines has diminished as the pandemic lingers. Understanding vaccine hesitancy among essential workers is important in reducing the impact of future pandemics by providing effective immunization programs delivered expeditiously. METHOD: Two surveys exploring COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in 2021 and 2022 were conducted in cohorts of health care providers (HCP) and education workers participating in prospective studies of COVID-19 illnesses and vaccine uptake. Demographic factors and opinions about vaccines (monovalent and bivalent) and public health measures were collected in these self-reported surveys. Modified multivariable Poisson regression was used to determine factors associated with hesitancy. RESULTS: In 2021, 3 % of 2061 HCP and 6 % of 3417 education workers reported hesitancy (p < 0.001). In December 2022, 21 % of 868 HCP and 24 % of 1457 education workers reported being hesitant to receive a bivalent vaccine (p = 0.09). Hesitance to be vaccinated with the monovalent vaccines was associated with earlier date of survey completion, later receipt of first COVID-19 vaccine dose, no influenza vaccination, and less worry about becoming ill with COVID-19. Factors associated with hesitance to be vaccinated with a bivalent vaccine that were common to both cohorts were receipt of two or fewer previous COVID-19 doses and lower certainty that the vaccines were safe and effective. CONCLUSION: Education workers were somewhat more likely than HCP to report being hesitant to receive COVID-19 vaccines but reasons for hesitancy were similar. Hesitancy was associated with non-receipt of previous vaccines (i.e., previous behaviour), less concern about being infected with SARS-CoV-2, and concerns about the safety and effectiveness of vaccines for both cohorts. Maintaining inter-pandemic trust in vaccines, ensuring rapid data generation during pandemics regarding vaccine safety and effectiveness, and effective and transparent communication about these data are all needed to support pandemic vaccination programs.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Health Personnel , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination Hesitancy , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Health Personnel/psychology , Male , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Vaccination Hesitancy/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination Hesitancy/psychology , Adult , Canada , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Vaccination/psychology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Educational Personnel/psychology , Prospective Studies
6.
J Infect Public Health ; 17(10): 102525, 2024 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39243689

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and Pap tests are recognized as effective preventive measures to reduce the incidence of HPV-related diseases among young adults. The objective of this study was to assess HPV vaccination and Pap test uptake, awareness, and barriers among young adults in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, including Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). METHODS: A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted from January to April 2024, involving 831 young adults aged 18-39 residing in GCC countries. The main outcome measures were HPV vaccination and Pap test uptake rates, awareness of the HPV vaccine and Pap testing, and barriers to vaccination. Data were collected using online platforms. The Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used for data analysis. RESULTS: The UAE had the highest vaccination rate at 18.9% (50/264), followed by Qatar at 5.8% (6/104), and KSA at 4.6% (10/216), p < 0.001. Individuals with health insurance had higher vaccination rates than those without (11% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.006). Awareness of the HPV vaccine was highest in the UAE (49.6%) and KSA (58.8%), while awareness of Pap smear testing among females was similarly high in these countries (62.4% and 65.9%, respectively). However, actual Pap smear testing rates were highest in Bahrain (15.9%) and Qatar (13.4%). The main barriers to vaccination cited by participants were lack of knowledge (53.6%) and the absence of medical recommendations (13.2%). CONCLUSION: The study's findings suggest the need of targeted educational campaigns to increase HPV vaccine uptake among both genders and Pap test participation among females. Additionally, incorporating HPV screening and vaccination into routine national programs in GCC countries and emphasising the crucial role of healthcare providers in influencing vaccination decisions are recommended strategies.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Papanicolaou Test , Papillomavirus Infections , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Vaccination , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Young Adult , Adult , Male , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Adolescent , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Middle East , Papanicolaou Test/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Human Papillomavirus Viruses
7.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2397875, 2024 Dec 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39323010

ABSTRACT

Physician recommendations can reduce vaccine hesitancy (VH) and improve uptake yet are often done poorly and can be improved by early-career training. We examined educational interventions for medical students in Western countries to explore what is being taught, identify effective elements, and review the quality of evidence. A mixed methods systematic narrative review, guided by the JBI framework, assessed the study quality using MERSQI and Cote & Turgeon frameworks. Data were extracted to analyze content and framing, with effectiveness graded using value-based judgment. Among the 33 studies with 30 unique interventions, effective studies used multiple methods grounded in educational theory to teach knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Most interventions reinforced a deficit-based approach (assuming VH stems from misinformation) which can be counterproductive. Effective interventions used hands-on, interactive methods emulating real practice, with short- and long-term follow-ups. Evidence-based approaches like motivational interviewing should frame interventions instead of the deficit model.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Students, Medical , Vaccination Hesitancy , Humans , Students, Medical/psychology , Students, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination Hesitancy/psychology , Vaccination/psychology , Education, Medical/methods
8.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 976, 2024 Sep 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39271982

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Even though the disease has spread throughout the world, with millions killed, global COVID-19 vaccination coverage remains low, particularly in developing countries. However, epidemiological data is lacking in the area. Hence, this study aimed to assess COVID-19 uptake, willingness for vaccination, and associated factors. METHOD: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted from May 1 to June 30, 2022, among patients attending chronic follow-up clinics in the two comprehensive specialized hospitals in Bahir Dar. The total sample size was 423. Participants were selected by a systematic random sampling technique. Data was gathered using a pre-tested questionnaire and analyzed using SPSS version 23. A descriptive analysis was performed. A binary logistic regression analysis was done to assess the association between variables. Variables with a p-value < 0.05 in the multi-variable logistic regression with a 95% confidence interval were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The analysis included 400 out of 423 participants, representing a 95% response rate. The COVID-19 vaccination uptake was 46.8%, while the acceptance was 60.5%. About 56% and 68% of the respondents had good knowledge and a favorable attitude, respectively. Elderly people were 2.7 times more likely to be vaccinated. Similarly, urban residents were 3.94 times more vaccinated. The probability of being vaccinated among respondents with good knowledge and favorable attitudes was 70% and 79%, respectively. The willingness for vaccination increased among those individuals with favorable attitudes (AOR: 1.82). Urban people were less likely to accept vaccination (AOR: 0.46). Some participants misunderstood that vaccination may aggravate their disease condition. CONCLUSION: The overall COVID-19 vaccine uptake and acceptance for vaccination were low compared to what was estimated by the WHO. Age, residence, knowledge, and attitude were associated with COVID-19 vaccine uptake and acceptance of vaccination. Besides, there was a high level of rumor about the status of the vaccine and risk factors. Hence, special emphasis is warranted to deliver centrally trusted information. Moreover, further nationwide studies are warranted in the future.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Vaccination , Humans , Ethiopia , Male , Female , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , COVID-19/prevention & control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adult , Middle Aged , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Young Adult , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Vaccination Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Aged , Hospitals, Special/statistics & numerical data
9.
Public Health Rep ; : 333549241280002, 2024 Sep 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39342452

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The HealthPartners' Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) team maintains standardized files of vaccines from medical and pharmacy claims and electronic health records (established data sources) for safety surveillance. Since 2021, for selected vaccines, data from the Minnesota Immunization Information Connection (MIIC), Minnesota's immunization information system, have been added to the HealthPartners' VSD files. We examined how MIIC data have enhanced the identification of novel and routine vaccines. METHODS: We describe the approach to incorporating MIIC data. We determined and compared the number and proportion of vaccines identified from established data sources with the additional capture of vaccine data identified from MIIC, in which age group and period of observation varied by vaccine. RESULTS: As of December 31, 2023, of 1 099 411 people in the HealthPartners' VSD cohort, 1 001 400 people (91%) were linked with an MIIC record. Across all data sources, for the full cohort, >2.7 million COVID-19 vaccine doses were recorded since 2020, >4000 mpox vaccine doses since 2022, >7.3 million influenza vaccine doses since 2004, >600 000 human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine doses since 2006, and >1.1 million diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccine doses since 2004. For COVID-19 vaccines, about 30% of vaccine doses were exclusively captured from MIIC, with the remaining 70% from established data sources. For the mpox vaccine, about 42% were exclusively from MIIC. For influenza, HPV, and DTaP vaccines, about 20%, 14%, and 17%, respectively, were exclusively identified from MIIC. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporation of data from state immunization information systems into existing vaccine data files can enhance monitoring on the safety of novel vaccines administered outside traditional health care settings and can enhance data quality for routine childhood and adult vaccines.

10.
Infect Drug Resist ; 17: 3933-3943, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39280728

ABSTRACT

Background: Pregnant women exhibit COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy due to concerns regarding potential risks to their babies, doubts about vaccine efficacy, and limited access to information. Therefore, this study aims to estimate COVID-19 vaccine uptake and factors associated with pregnant women in Mogadishu, Somalia. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on pregnant women using a questionnaire covering socio-demographic information, pregnancy-related characteristics, perceptions about the COVID-19 vaccine, and vaccination status. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were utilized to identify factors associated with the outcome variable. Results: Among the 400 pregnant women who participated in this study, 26.8% had received a COVID-19 vaccine dose, with only 14.9% receiving it during pregnancy. Reasons for not receiving the vaccine included a lack of information about the vaccine (47.4%), concerns about its adverse effects on personal health (33.8%), misconceptions regarding impacts on fertility or menstrual cycles (14.3%), belief in the vaccine's inefficacy (3.4%), and fears about adverse effects on their fetus. In multivariable logistic regression, pregnant women with a history of chronic diseases (AOR=3.27, 95% CI=1.992-6.145), those who perceived themselves at risk of contracting COVID-19 (AOR=3.81, 95% CI=2.11-5.10), those who believed that the vaccine was accessible to them (AOR=4.34, 95% CI=2.915-6.165), and those who discussed the COVID-19 vaccine with their healthcare provider (AOR=3.91, 95% CI=2.123-7.878) were more likely to receive the COVID-19 vaccine compared to their counterparts. Conclusion: Pregnant women in Mogadishu, Somalia, face challenges with sub-optimal covid-19 vaccine uptake. Implementations should improve awareness of COVID-19 risks and facilitate discussions between healthcare providers and pregnant women. In addition, efforts to provide reliable information about the vaccine, alleviate concerns about its adverse effects, and dispel misconceptions about fertility, menstrual cycles, efficacy, and foetal impact are crucial.

11.
BMC Med ; 22(1): 328, 2024 Aug 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39135035

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mothers play a crucial role in influencing their daughters' HPV vaccination decisions. Addressing barriers to receiving HPV vaccination among mothers of girls may achieve two goals in one strike: increasing vaccination coverage among both mothers and their daughters. This study aims to examine the HPV vaccination uptake and its determinants among mothers of girls in China at both the individual and interpersonal levels. METHODS: From July to October 2023, a cross-sectional online study was conducted to investigate HPV vaccine refusal for daughters aged 9-17 years among 11,678 mothers in Shenzhen, China. A randomized selection method was employed, targeting 11 primary schools and 13 secondary schools in Shenzhen. The research team invited mothers of girls to participate in an anonymous online survey. Multilevel logistic regression models (level 1: schools; level 2: individual participants) were employed to analyze the data. RESULTS: Among 11,678 mothers, 41.1% self-reported receiving at least one dose of HPV vaccination. Through multilevel logistic regression analysis, eight items measuring illness representations of HPV, which refers to how people think about HPV, were associated with higher HPV vaccination uptake (AOR: 1.02-1.14). These items included identity (identifying symptoms of HPV), timeline (whether HPV is acute/chronic), negative consequences, personal and treatment control (whether HPV is under volitional control), concern, negative emotions, and coherence (overall understanding of HPV). In addition, participants refusing HPV vaccines for the index daughters (AOR: 0.82, 95%CI: 0.76, 0.89) had lower vaccine uptake. Perceived more difficulties in accessing the 9-valent vaccines (AOR: 1.06, 95%CI: 1.04, 1.08) and more satisfaction with vaccine-related promotional materials (AOR: 1.50, 95%CI: 1.46, 1.54) at the individual level were associated with higher vaccine uptake. At the interpersonal factors, higher frequency of exposure to testimonials given by others about HPV vaccination on social media (AOR: 1.19, 95%CI: 1.14, 1.25) and thoughtful consideration of the veracity of the information (AOR: 1.11, 95%CI: 1.07, 1.16) were correlated with higher HPV vaccination uptake. CONCLUSIONS: These findings offer essential implications for modifying HPV disease perceptions, addressing difficulties in accessing the 9-valent HPV vaccines, and enhancing health communication needs to improve HPV vaccine uptake among mothers of girls.


Subject(s)
Mothers , Papillomavirus Infections , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Social Media , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Adolescent , China , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Child , Mothers/psychology , Adult , Vaccination/psychology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Nuclear Family , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires
12.
Diseases ; 12(8)2024 Aug 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39195182

ABSTRACT

Influenza immunization includes a yearly repeated vaccine offered to every healthcare worker, including nursing students, with a high risk of contracting this viral disease. This study aimed to investigate the vaccination coverage, knowledge, attitudes, and practices of nursing students against influenza in Greece. A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Attica region between September 2022 and July 2023, with the use of an anonymous reference questionnaire. Data from 1261 nursing students were recorded (response rate: 68.6%). The study found that 23% of the sample were vaccinated against influenza for the flu season 2022-2023, and 42% were vaccinated for the previous flu season. Knowledge scores regarding influenza ranged from 0% to 100%, with a mean value of 55 (SD = 18.8%). A higher level of knowledge about influenza was associated with more appropriate attitudes and practices toward the disease (p < 0.001). Notably, participants in their second, third, or fourth year of study and beyond exhibited more suitable attitudes and practices towards the flu compared to those in their first year of study (p < 0.05). The emergence of low vaccination coverage identifies the need for departments of nursing studies to proceed with the design of educational and intervention programs on infection control.

13.
J Community Health ; 2024 Aug 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39183233

ABSTRACT

The 2022 global outbreak of Mpox (formerly named Monkeypox) disproportionately impacted lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) populations, with a significant impact on sexual minority men. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among LGBTQ + adults living in New Jersey and New York to examine vaccination behaviors for Mpox. We sought out to understand the health experiences and behaviors of the population during the initial outbreak. This analysis included a subset of participants (n = 253) who completed the survey after the onset of the Mpox outbreak in May 2022. We examined awareness of and concerns about Mpox, willingness to vaccinate, as well as vaccination access and vaccination uptake. Our findings indicate that white, cisgender, gay men, as well as employed individuals, had the highest rates of vaccination for Mpox. Those with higher levels of concern about the virus were both more likely to be vaccinated and to report difficulty securing an appointment. Overall, our findings reinforce the health disparities in the population, demonstrating as with many other health conditions that white and economically stable individuals have advantages in accessing care.

14.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 848, 2024 Aug 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39169315

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) vaccines were rolled out in many countries; however, sub-optimal COVID-19 vaccine uptake remains a major public health concern globally. This study aimed at assessing the factors that affected the uptake, hesitancy, and resistance of the COVID-19 vaccine among university undergraduate students in Malawi, a least developed country in Africa. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study design was conducted using an online semi-structured questionnaire. A total of 343 University undergraduate students in Blantyre participated in this study after obtaining ethical clearance. Data was exported from Survey Monkey to Microsoft Excel version-21 for cleaning and was analysed using SPSS version-29. Descriptive statistics, including percentages, were performed to define the sample characteristics. Pearson Chi-square and Fisher's exact test were performed to identify significant relationships between vaccine uptake and demographics. A 95% confidence interval was set, and a p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Of the 343 participants, 43% were vaccinated. Among the vaccinated, the majority (47.3%, n = 69/146) received Johnson & Johnson vaccine followed by AstraZeneca (46.6%, n = 68/146). The commonly reported reason for vaccine acceptance was 'to protect me against getting COVID-19' (49%); whereas vaccine hesitancy was attributed to 'lack of knowledge (34%), and concerns about vaccine safety (25%). CONCLUSIONS: This study found that adequate knowledge about benefits and safety of COVID-19 vaccine could potentially increase uptake. Lack of credible information or misinformation contributed to vaccine hesitancy. The findings provide insights for design of strategies to increase future vaccine uptake and reduce determinants of vaccine hesitancy. To reduce vaccination hesitancy in any population with or without higher education, we recommend that institutions entrusted with vaccine management must optimise health messaging, and reduce mis-information and dis-information.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Students , Vaccination , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Male , Malawi , Students/psychology , Students/statistics & numerical data , Female , Universities , COVID-19/prevention & control , Young Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination/psychology , Vaccination Hesitancy/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination Hesitancy/psychology , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescent , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Educational Status
15.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2384180, 2024 Dec 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39106971

ABSTRACT

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, scheduled vaccinations were postponed, mass vaccination programmes were suspended and opportunities for healthcare workers to administer vaccines ad hoc decreased. The aims of this systematic literature review were to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on vaccine confidence, intent and uptake in preexisting routine childhood or adult vaccination programmes, and to identify factors associated with changes in acceptance, intent and uptake of preexisting vaccines. Medline and Embase were searched for studies in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Japan, the USA, and European countries, published between 1 January 2021 and 4 August 2022. A complementary gray literature search was conducted between 11 and 13 October 2022, and supplemented with additional gray research in October 2023. In total, 54 citations were included in the review. Study design and geography were heterogeneous. The number of adults who received or intended to receive an influenza or pneumococcal vaccine was higher during the pandemic than in previous seasons (n = 28 studies). In addition, increased acceptance of adult vaccinations was observed during 2020-21 compared with 2019-20 (n = 12 studies). The rates of childhood vaccinations decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic across several countries (n = 11 studies). Factors associated with changes in intention to receive a vaccination, or uptake of influenza vaccine, included previous vaccination, older age, higher perceived risk of contracting COVID-19, anxiety regarding the pandemic and fear of contracting COVID-19. Acceptance and uptake of influenza and pneumococcal vaccines generally increased after onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , Vaccination/psychology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , Adult , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Immunization Programs , Child , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Vaccination Hesitancy/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination Hesitancy/psychology , Pneumococcal Vaccines/administration & dosage , Pandemics/prevention & control , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology
16.
Vaccine X ; 19: 100519, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39105135

ABSTRACT

Background: Vaccination is one of the most effective available public health tools, preventing infectious diseases to safeguard public health and save millions of lives annually. However, in recent years vaccine hesitancy has increased among all populations, including healthcare workers. Healthcare providers are central to vaccination efforts due to their increased exposure to disease and vulnerable patients, and their role in patient confidence and decision-making. These decreasing uptake rates highlight a critical need to address specific barriers within this target group. This systematic review aims to explore the strategies used to improve vaccine uptake among healthcare providers. Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases, alongside a grey literature search, to identify studies describing interventions to improve vaccine uptake among healthcare providers. This was followed by de-duplication and double-blinded screening processes using Rayyan. Data extraction and thematic analysis focused on categorising interventions and identifying frequencies of use, to develop recommendations for further interventions tailored to target regions. Results: 60 studies were identified, predominantly concerning influenza vaccination. Interventions included educational initiatives, reminders, incentives, access solutions, feedback, and policy implementation. Key strategies included targeted educational lectures, posters, and pamphlets; mobile vaccination units; extended vaccination hours; and leadership engagement. The findings underscore the importance of a multifaceted approach combining educational efforts, enhanced accessibility, and motivational incentives to improve vaccination rates within the healthcare providers, especially where mandatory vaccination is controversial. Conclusions: This review evaluates tailored strategies to enhance vaccine confidence and uptake among healthcare providers, advocating for a holistic approach that includes educational initiatives, reminder systems, incentives, improved access, feedback mechanisms, and policy enactment to effectively address hesitancy and promote public health.

17.
West Afr J Med ; 41(5): 542-547, 2024 May 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39207905

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 vaccine uptake is cardinal in the control of COVID-19 pandemic. COVID-19 vaccine uptake is hindered by misinformation, conspiracy theory, and religious beliefs globally. This has posed a threat in curbing the spread of this highly infectious virus. Hence, knowledge of COVID-19 vaccine uptake predictors would help mitigate the burden of COVID-19 disease. OBJECTIVE: To determine the predictors of COVID-19 vaccine uptake at the Federal Medical Centre, Makurdi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was a descriptive crosssectional study over 3 months from January to March 2022. The sample size was 384 at 50% prevalence. A self-administered questionnaire was employed using convenience sampling. Data analysis was done using SPSS version 23. The level of statistical significance was set at p<0.05. RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 39.97±5.56. The majority were aged 21-40 (52.9%, n=203). There were more males (57.6%, n=221). The proportion of COVID-19 uptake was 21.6%. There was a statistically significant relationship between taking the COVID-19 vaccine and age, marital status, education, occupation, job discipline, monthly income, type of family, place of residence, childhood vaccination, immunization as an adult, and family members/close contact with COVID-19. In addition, COVID-19 vaccine uptake was also significantly associated with the belief that the COVID-19 vaccine has not been thoroughly tested, that they could rely on the vaccine to stop severe disease and that pharmaceutical companies use COVID-19 to make money. The predictors of COVID-19 vaccine uptake were marital status (p-value= 0.001, aoR=0.286, 95% CI= 0.146-0.563), family type (p-value= 0.001, AoR=6.346, 95% CI= 2.700-14.912), those residing in an urban area (p-value= 0.024, AoR= 3.130, 95% CI= 1.164-8.416) and those who believe COVID 19 vaccine could stop the severe form of the disease (p-value= 0.001, AoR= 2.448, 95% CI= 1.560-3.841). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 vaccine uptake rate was low. The predictors of COVID-19 vaccine uptake were married respondents in a nuclear setting, residing in urban areas and believing that COVID 19 vaccine could stop the severe form of the disease.


CONTEXTE: L'adoption du vaccin COVID-19 est essentielle pour contrôler la pandémie de COVID-19. L'adoption du vaccin COVID-19 est entravée par la désinformation, les théories du complot et les croyances religieuses dans le monde entier. Cela constitue une menace pour endiguer la propagation de ce virus hautement infectieux. Par conséquent, la connaissance des prédicteurs de l'adoption du vaccin COVID-19 aiderait à réduire le fardeau de la maladie COVID-19. OBJECTIF: Déterminer les prédicteurs de l'adoption du vaccin COVID-19 au Centre Médical Fédéral de Makurdi. MÉTHODES: L'étude était une étude descriptive transversale sur une période de 3 mois, réalisée de janvier à mars 2022. La taille de l'échantillon était de 384 avec une prévalence de 50 %. Un questionnaire auto-administré a été utilisé en utilisant un échantillonnage de commodité. L'analyse des données a été effectuée à l'aide de SPSS version 23. Le niveau de signification statistique a été fixé à p<0.05. RÉSULTATS: L'âge moyen des participants était de 39,97±5,56 ans. La majorité avait entre 21 et 40 ans (52,9 %, n=203). Il y avait plus d'hommes (57,6 %, n=221). La proportion d'adoption du vaccin COVID-19 était de 21,6%. Il existait une relation statistiquement significative entre la prise du vaccin COVID-19 et l'âge, l'état matrimonial, le niveau d'éducation, l'occupation, la discipline professionnelle, le revenu mensuel, le type de famille, le lieu de résidence, la vaccination infantile, la vaccination à l'âge adulte, les membres de la famille ou les contacts proches ayant contracté le COVID-19. De plus, l'adoption du vaccin COVID-19 était également significativement associée à la croyance que le vaccin COVID-19 n'a pas été suffisamment testé, qu'ils pouvaient compter sur le vaccin pour éviter une forme grave de la maladie et que les compagnies pharmaceutiques utilisaient le COVID-19 pour gagner de l'argent. Les prédicteurs de l'adoption du vaccin COVID-19 étaient l'état matrimonial (p-value=0,001, aoR=0,286, IC à 95 %=0,146-0,563), le type de famille (p-value=0,001, AoR=6,346, IC à 95 %=2,700-14,912), ceux résidant en zones urbaines (p-value=0,024, AoR=3,130, IC à 95 %=1,164-8,416) et ceux croyant que le vaccin COVID-19 pouvait éviter les formes graves de la maladie (p-value=0,001, AoR=2,448, IC à 95 %=1,560-3,841). CONCLUSION: Le taux d'adoption du vaccin COVID-19 était faible. Les prédicteurs de l'adoption du vaccin COVID-19 étaient les répondants mariés vivant dans un cadre nucléaire, résidant en zones urbaines et croyant que le vaccin COVID-19 pouvait éviter les formes graves de la maladie. MOTS CLÉS: COVID-19, Prédicteurs, Hôpital tertiaire, Adoption du vaccin.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Tertiary Care Centers , Humans , Nigeria , Male , Adult , Female , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires , SARS-CoV-2 , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data
18.
Vaccine ; 42(22): 126172, 2024 Sep 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39173435

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Childhood vaccine uptake in the United Kingdom (UK) is sub-optimal leading to outbreaks of preventable diseases. We aimed to explore UK parents' perspectives on why some children are unvaccinated or vaccinated late. METHODS: We undertook a mixed-methods, co-production study involving a survey using a questionnaire followed by focus groups. We partnered with The Mosaic Community Trust (Mosaic) who are based in a more deprived, ethnically diverse, low vaccine uptake area of London. Targeted recruitment to complete the questionnaire (either on paper or online) was done through Mosaic, community networks and social media promotion. We collected demographic data alongside parents' views on routine childhood vaccination, their vaccine decisions, and experiences of accessing childhood vaccine appointments We report descriptive findings from the questionnaire and thematic analysis of free-text questionnaire answers and focus groups guided by the COM-B model of Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation. RESULTS: Between June-October 2022, 518 parents were surveyed of whom 25% (n = 130), were from ethnic minorities (13%, n = 68-unknown ethnicity). In 2023 we held four focus groups with 22 parents (10 from ethnic minorities). Only 15% (n = 78) parents had delayed or refused a vaccine for their child. A quarter of parents felt they had not been given enough information nor an opportunity to ask questions before their children's vaccinations. Inconsistent reminders and difficulties booking or attending appointments impacted vaccine uptake with negative experiences influencing future vaccine decisions. Parents had mixed views on vaccinations being given in different locations and wanted trusted health professionals to vaccinate their children. CONCLUSION: To reverse declining vaccine uptake and prevent future outbreaks it needs to be easier for UK parents to speak to health professionals to answer their childhood vaccine questions, alongside simplified booking systems and easier access to routine childhood vaccine appointments.


Subject(s)
Focus Groups , Parents , Vaccination , Humans , Female , Male , Parents/psychology , United Kingdom , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vaccination/psychology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Vaccination Hesitancy/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination Hesitancy/psychology , Infant , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Vaccines/administration & dosage
19.
Int J STD AIDS ; : 9564624241273778, 2024 Aug 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39163149

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) face a disproportionate burden of sexually transmitted infections and are eligible for targeted vaccinations for hepatitis A (HAV), hepatitis B (HBV), human papilloma virus (HPV) and mpox. This study examines the sociodemographic characteristics, sexual behaviours, and sexual healthcare service (SHS) use associated with vaccination uptake. METHODS: We undertook analyses of RiiSH-Mpox - an online, community-based survey with GBMSM recruited via social media and dating apps. We calculated vaccination uptake (≥1 dose) among eligible GBMSM. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors independently associated with vaccination uptake among eligible participants. RESULTS: Reported uptake in eligible GBMSM was around two-thirds for each of the vaccinations considered: mpox 69% (95% confidence interval (CI): 66%-72%), HAV 68% (CI:65%-70%), HBV 72% (CI:69%-74%) and HPV 65% (CI:61%-68%). Vaccination course completion (receiving all recommended doses) ranged from 75% (HBV) to 89% (HAV) among eligible GBMSM. Individuals who represented missed opportunities for vaccination ranged from 22 to 30% of eligible SHS attendees. Younger participants, individuals identifying as bisexual, reporting lower educational qualifications, or being unemployed reported lower uptake across multiple GBMSM-selective vaccinations. Individuals who reported greater levels of sexual behaviour and recent SHS use were more likely to report vaccinations. CONCLUSION: Eligible participants reported high uptake of vaccinations; however, uptake was lower amongst young GBMSM and self-identifying bisexual men. Awareness of groups with lower vaccination uptake will help inform practice, delivery strategies and health promotion, to improve the reach and impact of vaccinations amongst GBMSM.

20.
J Affect Disord ; 365: 400-405, 2024 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39147152

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Little is known about rates of COVID-19 vaccine uptake among youth with bipolar spectrum disorders (BSD). As such, the aim of this study is to assess rates and predictors of COVID-19 vaccine uptake among youth with BSD and their caregivers in the United States. METHODS: Youth and their main caregiver were recruited from a large pragmatic study cohort. Youth who were aged 8-22 at the time of this data collection, had a bipolar-spectrum disorder diagnosis, had overweight or obesity, and were treated with a second-generation antipsychotic were invited to participate in an online survey and interview assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: A total of 453 surveys and 341 interviews were completed 07/2021-05/2022 by youth and their caregivers. Sixty-seven percent of caregivers and 63 % of youth reported receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. Vaccine uptake rates among youth and caregivers were highly correlated. Predictors of vaccine uptake among youth were older age and living in the Northeast Region of the United States. Predictors of caregiver vaccine uptake were male sex, higher annual household income and not having to quarantine due to COVID-19. LIMITATIONS: The sample was small and not a full representation of a population with bipolar-spectrum disorders therefore, the results may not be generalizable. The study design and statistical method do not allow for causal inferences to be made. CONCLUSIONS: These findings may aid in targeting interventions to maximize COVID-19 and other vaccine uptake in youth with bipolar disorders and their families.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Caregivers , Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Caregivers/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/prevention & control , Child , United States , Young Adult , SARS-CoV-2 , Adult , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL