Doctors' perception on the ethical use of AI-enabled clinical decision support systems for antibiotic prescribing recommendations in Singapore.

Objectives: The increased utilization of Artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare changes practice and introduces ethical implications for AI adoption in medicine. We assess medical doctors' ethical stance in situations that arise in adopting an AI-enabled Clinical Decision Support System (AI-CDSS) for antibiotic prescribing decision support in a healthcare institution in Singapore. Methods: We conducted in-depth interviews with 30 doctors of varying medical specialties and designations between October 2022 and January 2023. Our interview guide was anchored on the four pillars of medical ethics. We used clinical vignettes with the following hypothetical scenarios: (1) Using an antibiotic AI-enabled CDSS's recommendations for a tourist, (2) Uncertainty about the AI-CDSS's recommendation of a narrow-spectrum antibiotic vs. concerns about antimicrobial resistance, (3) Patient refusing the "best treatment" recommended by the AI-CDSS, (4) Data breach. Results: More than half of the participants only realized that the AI-enabled CDSS could have misrepresented non-local populations after being probed to think about the AI-CDSS's data source. Regarding prescribing a broad- or narrow-spectrum antibiotic, most participants preferred to exercise their clinical judgment over the AI-enabled CDSS's recommendations in their patients' best interest. Two-thirds of participants prioritized beneficence over patient autonomy by convincing patients who refused the best practice treatment to accept it. Many were unaware of the implications of data breaches. Conclusion: The current position on the legal liability concerning the use of AI-enabled CDSS is unclear in relation to doctors, hospitals and CDSS providers. Having a comprehensive ethical legal and regulatory framework, perceived organizational support, and adequate knowledge of AI and ethics are essential for successfully implementing AI in healthcare.

The Incredible Story of India's Revolutionary Feminist: Dr. Muthulakshmi Reddy (1886-1968).

The term 'trailblazer' is often used casually nowadays, but in the early twentieth century, there was a woman who epitomized it by shattering barriers at every turn. Dr. Muthulakshmi Reddy who holds many firsts to her name was an outstanding Indian woman of her time. She was an eminent medical practitioner who wore multiple hats throughout her life as an educator, a lawmaker, and a social reformer. She sacrificed her lifetime for women's upliftment and children especially the underprivileged. She played a pivotal role in establishing one of India's largest cancer institutes as a 'mission' to provide treatment among all sections of people regardless of their socio-economic background. The main purpose of this article is to highlight the indisputable contribution of Dr. Muthulakshmi Reddy in the fields of medicine, education, law, and much more.

Dominique-Jean Larrey (1766-1842): The Founder of the Modern Triage System.

Dominique-Jean Larrey was a prominent French surgeon who rose to fame during the age of the Napoleonic Wars. During his service in the French military, he developed dozens of medical innovations. Most important of all were his improvements to the evacuation of the wounded from the battlefield, triage of the wounded, and rapid surgical intervention. His innovations revolutionized military medicine and are still the basis for modern practice today.

Dr. Dilip Mahalanabis (1934-2022): Trailblazer in Diarrheal Disease Management.

Dilip Mahalanabis, an esteemed Indian pediatrician, revolutionized global health through his pioneering work in combatting diarrheal diseases, particularly during the Bangladesh War of Independence in 1971. His development of oral rehydration therapy (ORT) provided a simple, cost-effective solution that significantly reduced mortality rates among cholera patients. Mahalanabis' dedication to equitable healthcare, evidenced by his leadership roles in organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO), underscores his legacy as a champion for vulnerable populations. ORT's widespread adoption has democratized treatment, empowering communities and drastically reducing mortality rates associated with diarrheal diseases.

Nurse judgements of hospitalized patients' safety concerns are affected by patient, nurse and event characteristics: A factorial survey experiment.

AIM: To test the influences of patient, safety event and nurse characteristics on nurse judgements of credibility, importance and intent to report patients' safety concerns. DESIGN: Factorial survey experiment. METHODS: A total of 240 nurses were recruited and completed an online survey including demographic information and responses to eight factorial vignettes consisting of unique combinations of eight patient and event factors. Hierarchical multivariate analysis was used to test influences of vignette factors and nurse characteristics on nurse judgements. RESULTS: The intraclass coefficients for nurse judgements suggest that the variation among nurses exceeded the influence of contextual vignette factors. Several significant sources of nurse variation were identified, including race/ethnicity, suggesting a complex relationship between nurses' characteristics and their potential biases, and the influence of personal and patient factors on nurses' judgements, including the decision to report safety concerns. CONCLUSION: Nurses are key players in the system to manage patient safety concerns. Variation among nurses and how they respond to scenarios of patient safety concerns highlight the need for nurse-level intervention. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE: Complex factors influence nurses' judgement, interpretation and reporting of patients' safety concerns. IMPACT: Understanding nurse judgement regarding patient-expressed safety concerns is critical for designing processes and systems that promote reporting. Multiple event and patient characteristics (type of event and apparent harm, and patient gender, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and communication approach) as well as participant characteristics (race/ethnicity, gender, years of experience and primary hospital area) impacted participants' judgements of credibility, degree of concern and intent to report. These findings will help guide patient safety nurse education and training. REPORTING METHOD: STROBE guidelines. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Members of the public, including patient advocates, were involved in content validation of the vignette scenarios, norming photographs used in the factorial survey and testing the survey functionality.

The role of psychological formulation in inpatient settings in supporting staff empathy and therapeutic optimism for adults diagnosed with borderline personality disorder: A pre- and post-vignette study.

WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: Psychological formulation brings together a service user story and expertise, with psychological knowledge, research, and practitioners clinical experience to make sense of a service users' presentation (thinking about their difficulties but also strengths). Evidence into the effectiveness of formulation is largely anecdotal, qualitative, or small scale. Although this is very valuable research, there is not a lot of research which quantitatively evidences the role of formulation for service users or services. Quantitative evidence that does exist is also conflicting. Considering how widely psychological formulation is used, and the governing guidelines that recognize this as a core competency for psychological practitioners, it is important to continue to add to the evidence base. WHAT THE PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: Psychological formulation can increase staff empathy and hope. This could help service users to feel more understood and hopeful. Formulation; however, did not impact feelings of personal distress in staff. This research may suggest a need for the two distinct processes (i.e. team formulation and reflective practice) to support all components of empathy within inpatient services. Psychological formulation could support the provision of psychologically informed care within inpatient services, of which promotes effective care delivery. ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: National Health Service (NHS) values, such as empathy and therapeutic optimism, are integral when supporting service users with complex mental health presentations. There is some evidence to suggest that psychological formulation can increase empathy and optimism in healthcare professionals. This study, therefore, aimed to investigate whether a psychological formulation of a hypothetical service user with a complex presentation, typically labelled with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD), increased empathy and therapeutic optimism in professionals working in mental health inpatient services. METHOD: Sixty-six mental health professionals working in NHS inpatient services took part in a pre- and post-vignette study. Participants were asked to read a case vignette about a hypothetical service user, with a diagnostic label of BPD, and complete questionnaires capturing levels of empathy and therapeutic optimism. Participants were then randomized into two conditions and either asked to read the same information again (control condition) or read a psychological formulation based on the same hypothetical service user (intervention condition). The findings were analysed using a series of ANCOVAs/ANCOHETs. RESULTS: Two constructs of empathy (i.e. perspective taking and empathic concern), and therapeutic optimism significantly increased following exposure to the psychological formulation when compared to the control group condition. CONCLUSION: This study warrants further replication. These initial findings; however, indicate that psychological formulation can significantly increase the ability to perspective take, display empathic concern, and hold therapeutic optimism towards service users with a presentation associated with a diagnosis of BPD.

The alternative fairytale: how personal history shapes identity and resilience in medicine.

In "The Alternative Fairytale," I explore my journey as a cardiology registrar/fellow, a path influenced deeply by my early displacement from war-torn Sudan. This piece reflects on the interplay between my professional choices and personal identity amidst the backdrop of a male-dominated field and societal expectations. It examines how my roots in a family that once fled conflict have shaped my approach to medicine-emphasizing community, empathy, and a leadership style that diverges from traditional norms. Through this narrative, I aim to redefine and help others to reflect on what success looks like in cardiology and medicine; advocating for diversity in leadership styles and highlight the importance of personal background in shaping professional paths.

Dr. Himmatrao Bawaskar: Transforming Rural Healthcare Through Scientific Inquiry and Advocacy.

Dr. Himmatrao Bawaskar, a distinguished figure in Indian healthcare, has made significant contributions to medical research and public health, particularly in rural areas. Born in 1951 in Maharashtra, his journey from a rural upbringing to receiving one of the highest civilian awards of the Government of India, the Padma Shri, reflects his dedication to the field of medicine and public health. Dr. Bawaskar's groundbreaking research on scorpion stings, notably the use of prazosin, has revolutionized treatment protocols, significantly reducing mortality rates. Beyond scorpion stings, his work spans diverse medical areas, including snake bites and cardiovascular diseases. Moreover, Dr. Bawaskar's advocacy for ethical practices and healthcare reform underscores his commitment to improving healthcare outcomes. His legacy serves as an inspiration for future generations of healthcare professionals and policymakers, emphasizing the transformative power of dedication, compassion, and scientific inquiry in addressing critical healthcare challenges.

Charles Kelman: The Father of Phacoemulsification.

Charles D. Kelman was a brilliant American ophthalmologist who revolutionized cataract surgery by introducing phacoemulsification to replace extracapsular cataract extraction. He used an ultrasonic probe to emulsify and aspirate the lens through a small incision (3-4 mm). Kelman's technique met initial resistance at first, but it gained global acceptance after proving its safety and effectiveness in the management of cataractous eyes, and it has been the preferred technique until now. Today, the entire surgery is performed in 5-7 minutes. This technique also helped to reduce hospitalization after the surgical removal of a cataract. Kelman is one of the greatest surgeons of the last century.

Legacy of Compassion: The Life and Contributions of Dr. Ronald Joseph Garst in Advancing Orthopaedic Surgery in Bangladesh.

Dr. Ronald Joseph Garst, a distinguished spine surgeon and missionary, significantly impacted the field of orthopaedic surgery in Bangladesh, especially during and after the country's Liberation War, when the nation had no orthopaedic specialists. His experiences during Bangladesh's struggle for independence inspired him to establish rehabilitation centers for injured freedom fighters and to found the Rehabilitation Institute and Hospital for the Disabled (RIHD), which later became the National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Rehabilitation (NITOR), Bangladesh's first tertiary-level trauma center. In Bangladesh, Dr. Garst was critical in organizing care for injured freedom fighters, setting up a central limb and brace center, and launching a post-graduate training program for orthopaedics, physiotherapists, and occupational therapists. He successfully raised funds, attracted international support, and provided essential training to Bangladeshi doctors, nurses, and limb-makers.  Dr. Garst's legacy extends beyond his medical achievements; his humanitarian spirit and dedication to helping the underprivileged earned him honorary citizenship in Bangladesh. He remained committed to supporting ongoing efforts at RIHD, frequently visiting Bangladesh and contributing equipment and training materials until his passing. Dr. Garst's contributions, such as initiating morning academic sessions at RIHD, continue to influence the orthopaedic community in Bangladesh. This article explores Dr. Garst's remarkable journey, his influence on orthopaedic surgery in Bangladesh, and the enduring impact of his work.

Reliability of Suicide Risk Estimates: A Vignette Study.

OBJECTIVE: Suicide risk assessments are obligatory when patients express a death wish in clinical practice. Yet, suicide risk estimates based on unguided risk assessments have been shown to be of low reliability. Since generalizability of previous studies is limited, the current study aimed to assess inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of risk estimates conducted by psychotherapists and psychology students using written case vignettes. METHOD: In total, N = 256 participants (psychology students, psychotherapists) were presented with 24 case vignettes describing patients at either low, moderate, severe or extreme risk of suicide. Participants were asked to assign a level of risk to each single vignette at a baseline assessment and again at a follow-up assessment two weeks later. RESULTS: Risk estimates showed a low inter-rater reliability, both for students (AC1 = .35) and for psychotherapists (AC1 = .44). Intra-rater reliability was moderate for psychotherapists (AC1 = .59) and rather low for psychology students (AC1 = .47). In general, intra- and intra-rater reliability were highest for vignettes displaying "low" and "extreme" risk. CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight that the reliability of unguided suicide risk assessments is questionable. Standardized risk assessment protocols are therefore recommended. Nonetheless, even reliable risk estimation does not imply predictive validity of risk estimates for future suicidal behavior.

Suicide risk estimates have been shown to be of low reliabilitySuicide risk estimates by psychotherapists and students also showed low inter-rater and intra-rater reliability in the current studyReliable risk estimation does not imply predictive validity of risk estimates for future suicidal behavior.

Allvar Gullstrand: The Only Ophthalmologist Who Won the Nobel Prize.

Allvar Gullstrand, the Swedish ophthalmologist and Nobel laureate, was a self-taught mathematician who applied mathematics and higher-order equations to understand the optic system. His inventions, the slit lamp, and the ophthalmoscope are used in clinical practice for the diagnosis of eye diseases. With his efforts, he explained the accommodation, the process of changing the shape of the lens to focus on near or distant objects. In 1911, he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. In 1913, he was elected as the first president of the Swedish Ophthalmological Society. In 1927, he was awarded the Graefe Medal of the Deutsche Ophthalmologische Gesellschaft.

Preferred study designs to support a comparative therapeutic strategy question in oncology: a vignette study.

INTRODUCTION: Some therapeutic strategy questions in oncology could be answered with studies using observational data. Target trial emulation is the application of design principles from randomized controlled trials to the analysis of observational data, to reduce design-induced biases. Our objective was to determine which type of study physicians would preferably plan to answer a comparative effectiveness question lacking evidence in oncology. METHODS: We launched an online survey among physicians specialized in oncology. We constructed a vignette-based inquiry where vignettes described study scenarios which could be conducted to answer the predefined question. We designed six vignettes described by study design (randomized controlled trial or observational study with a trial emulation framework), main study characteristics, probability of the study succeeding and anticipated delay before results availability. Participants randomly assessed five pair-wise comparisons of the vignettes and were asked which study they would preferably plan by using a Likert scale. The main outcome was the evaluation of clinicians' preferences for each pairwise comparison. Mean and median preference scores were calculated. RESULTS: 213 participants, specialized in many tumor types, assessed at least one comparison with 82% reporting France as their country of affiliation. The interquartile range was -4 to 4 across pairwise comparisons. The median preference score was in disfavor of the monocentric randomized controlled trial for the five comparisons where it appeared. The median preference score was strongly in favor of the multicentric national emulated trial when compared to the monocentric emulated trial 4 [IQ 2.5-4]. The mean preference score was the highest for the large European observational study 1.14 (SD 3.33), while the mean preference score was the lowest for the monocentric randomized controlled trial -1.86 (SD 2.93). CONCLUSION: No study design was strongly preferred, but the monocentric randomized controlled trial was the least favored study in pair-wise comparisons. The planification of the new research is a compromise between scientific soundness, feasibility, cost, and time before obtaining results. We need to have the right answers to the right questions at the right time.

Dr. Newton Shaffer (1846-1928): Renowned Orthopedic Surgeon and Founder of the American Orthopaedic Association.

An unsung hero of American orthopedic surgery is the largely forgotten Dr. Newton Melman Shaffer (1846-1928). Upon graduating from medical school at New York University, Shaffer began his career training at the Hospital for the Ruptured and Crippled in 1867. Shaffer then went on to practice at St. Luke's Hospital and New York Orthopaedic Dispensary and Hospital where he became chief. Here, Shaffer made major contributions to the field in treating clubfoot and tuberculosis. He then declared orthopedics as a separate entity from general surgery at the 10th International Medical Congress. He helped start the American Orthopaedic Association to push for the recognition of American orthopedics to the international community. In 1900, Shaffer opened the first state-run hospital for underprivileged children requiring rehabilitation. During his career, Shaffer advocated for conservative orthopedic treatments, aided in the invention of medical devices, contributed largely to academic orthopedics, and successfully advocated for the inception of the field of orthopedic surgery.

An Exploratory Study of Physician Decision-Making When Treating Uncontrolled COPD.

Purpose: Current guidelines recommend triple therapy maintenance inhalers for patients with recurrent exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); however, these maintenance therapies are underutilized. This study aimed to understand how physicians make COPD treatment decisions, and how combination maintenance therapies are utilized in a real-world setting. Patients and Methods: This exploratory, hypothesis-generating, non-interventional study used a cross-sectional online survey that was administered to a sample of practicing physicians in the United States. The survey included five fictitious vignettes detailing common symptoms experienced by patients with COPD. Survey questions included factors physicians consider in their decisions, and perceived barriers to prescribing treatments. Repeated measures multivariable analyses were conducted to evaluate how likely physicians were to switch to triple therapy versus no change to patient's current maintenance therapy or change to another maintenance therapy. Results: In total, 200 physicians completed the survey. Cost of treatment and patient access to treatment were reported as the most common barriers physicians consider in their prescribing decisions. Physicians were more likely to switch a patient's maintenance inhaler to triple therapy versus no change to maintenance inhaler if they considered the patient's history of new symptoms, insurance status, and clinical guidelines in their decision. Physicians with more experience treating patients with COPD, and those who treat more patients with COPD per week, were more likely to switch to triple therapy versus no change to maintenance inhaler. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the complexity of factors that can influence physicians' decisions when prescribing treatments for patients with COPD, including considerations of treatment cost, patient access and adherence, patient comorbidities, efficacy of current treatment, clinical guidelines, and provider's level of experience treating COPD. Further research may help elucidate the relative importance of the factors influencing physicians' decisions and inform what types of decision-support tools would be most beneficial.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) symptoms can be effectively managed with maintenance therapies, which are treatments that are taken routinely to help improve symptoms. A combination of three different therapies (triple therapy maintenance) has been shown to be more effective than a combination of two different therapies (dual therapy maintenance) in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. However, maintenance therapies, including triple therapy, are underutilized. This study aimed to explore how physicians make their treatment decisions for patients with COPD, and how combination maintenance therapies are utilized. To do so, we administered a survey to a sample of practicing physicians in the United States. The survey included five clinically based, fictitious profiles, or vignettes, of patients with COPD, with common symptoms and patient characteristics being described. Physicians were then asked to answer questions about what treatment they would prescribe for each patient, and any factors they considered when deciding on a treatment for a patient. We found that cost of treatment and patient access to treatment were the most common barriers that physicians considered when choosing a treatment. Physicians were also more likely to switch a patient's maintenance inhaler to a triple therapy maintenance inhaler if they considered the patient's history of new symptoms, patient's insurance status, and clinical guidelines when making their decisions. Our study shows that there are many complex factors that influence physicians' decisions when deciding on a treatment for patients with COPD.

Effects of (de)motivating supervision styles on junior doctors' intrinsic motivation through basic psychological need frustration and satisfaction: an experimental vignette study.

In clinical practice, junior doctors regularly receive supervision from consultants. Drawing on Basic Psychological Needs Theory, consultants' supervision styles are likely to affect junior doctors' intrinsic motivation differently in terms of psychological need frustration and psychological need satisfaction. To examine the effects of (de)motivating supervision styles, we conducted two experimental vignette studies among junior doctors. In Study 1 (N = 150, 73.3% female), we used a 2 (need support: high vs. low) x 2 (directiveness: high vs. low) between-subjects design and, in Study 2, a within-subjects design with the same factors (N = 46, 71.7% female). Both studies revealed a consistent positive effect of need-supportive supervision styles on psychological need satisfaction (+), need frustration (-), and intrinsic motivation (+). Particularly in Study 2, the main effect of need-supportive styles was strengthened by supervisor's directiveness. Moreover, in both studies, the effects of supervision styles on intrinsic motivation were explained through psychological need frustration and psychological need satisfaction. We discuss the implications of these findings for postgraduate clinical training.

F. Mason Sones Jr.: The Serendipitous Discovery of Coronary Angiography and Its Lasting Impact on Cardiology.

F. Mason Sones Jr. (1918-1985) was a pioneering cardiologist whose groundbreaking work revolutionized the field of cardiology. His accidental discovery of coronary angiography in 1958 at the Cleveland Clinic provided physicians with the first clear visualization of coronary arteries in living patients, paving the way for the development of coronary artery bypass surgery and interventional cardiology. This review article explores F. Mason Sones Jr.'s life and career, and his lasting impact on the field of cardiology. Born in Noxapater, MS, in 1918, F. Mason Sones Jr. attended Western Maryland College (Westminster, MD) and the University of Maryland School of Medicine (Baltimore, MD) before completing his internship and residency at the University Hospital (Baltimore, MD) and Henry Ford Hospital (Detroit, MI), respectively. After serving in the U.S. Army Air Corps during World War II, F. Mason Sones Jr. joined the Cleveland Clinic (Cleveland, OH), in 1950, as the head of pediatric cardiology, where he combined his expertise in cardiac catheterization with his interest in congenital heart disease. F. Mason Sones Jr.'s serendipitous discovery of coronary angiography occurred during a routine cardiac catheterization procedure when he inadvertently injected contrast dye directly into the right coronary artery. Realizing that smaller amounts of dye could safely opacify the coronary arteries, F. Mason Sones Jr. refined and standardized the technique of selective coronary angiography, collaborating with engineers to improve X-ray imaging and establishing protocols that remain the standard of care today. F. Mason Sones Jr.'s work provided the foundation for the development of coronary artery bypass surgery by Dr. René Favaloro and the birth of interventional cardiology, as pioneered by Dr. Andreas Gruentzig. As the director of cardiovascular disease at the Cleveland Clinic (1966-1975), F. Mason Sones Jr. mentored and inspired a generation of cardiologists, cementing his legacy as a visionary leader in the field. Throughout his career, F. Mason Sones Jr. received numerous awards and honors, including the American Medical Association's Scientific Achievement Award and the Gairdner Foundation International Award. He co-founded and served as the first president of the Society for Cardiac Angiography (now SCAI), an organization dedicated to advancing the field of interventional cardiology. This review article pays tribute to F. Mason Sones Jr.'s enduring contributions to the field of cardiology, highlighting his role as a pioneer, innovator, and mentor. His legacy continues to inspire and guide generations of cardiologists in their pursuit of improving patient care and pushing the boundaries of cardiovascular medicine.

Controlling Inputter Variability in Vignette Studies Assessing Web-Based Symptom Checkers: Evaluation of Current Practice and Recommendations for Isolated Accuracy Metrics.

BACKGROUND: The rapid growth of web-based symptom checkers (SCs) is not matched by advances in quality assurance. Currently, there are no widely accepted criteria assessing SCs' performance. Vignette studies are widely used to evaluate SCs, measuring the accuracy of outcome. Accuracy behaves as a composite metric as it is affected by a number of individual SC- and tester-dependent factors. In contrast to clinical studies, vignette studies have a small number of testers. Hence, measuring accuracy alone in vignette studies may not provide a reliable assessment of performance due to tester variability. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the impact of tester variability on the accuracy of outcome of SCs, using clinical vignettes. It further aims to investigate the feasibility of measuring isolated aspects of performance. METHODS: Healthily's SC was assessed using 114 vignettes by 3 groups of 3 testers who processed vignettes with different instructions: free interpretation of vignettes (free testers), specified chief complaints (partially free testers), and specified chief complaints with strict instruction for answering additional symptoms (restricted testers). κ statistics were calculated to assess agreement of top outcome condition and recommended triage. Crude and adjusted accuracy was measured against a gold standard. Adjusted accuracy was calculated using only results of consultations identical to the vignette, following a review and selection process. A feasibility study for assessing symptom comprehension of SCs was performed using different variations of 51 chief complaints across 3 SCs. RESULTS: Intertester agreement of most likely condition and triage was, respectively, 0.49 and 0.51 for the free tester group, 0.66 and 0.66 for the partially free group, and 0.72 and 0.71 for the restricted group. For the restricted group, accuracy ranged from 43.9% to 57% for individual testers, averaging 50.6% (SD 5.35%). Adjusted accuracy was 56.1%. Assessing symptom comprehension was feasible for all 3 SCs. Comprehension scores ranged from 52.9% and 68%. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that by improving standardization of the vignette testing process, there is a significant improvement in the agreement of outcome between testers. However, significant variability remained due to uncontrollable tester-dependent factors, reflected by varying outcome accuracy. Tester-dependent factors, combined with a small number of testers, limit the reliability and generalizability of outcome accuracy when used as a composite measure in vignette studies. Measuring and reporting different aspects of SC performance in isolation provides a more reliable assessment of SC performance. We developed an adjusted accuracy measure using a review and selection process to assess data algorithm quality. In addition, we demonstrated that symptom comprehension with different input methods can be feasibly compared. Future studies reporting accuracy need to apply vignette testing standardization and isolated metrics.

Saudi women pioneers in neurological surgery: Insights into progress and inclusion.

Forty years ago, General Professor Dr. Khalaf Al-Mouteary established the first neurosurgical department in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Here, we explored various pieces of evidence on the progress and inclusion of Saudi female pioneers in the neurosurgical workforce of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. We gathered information data on the inclusion of women in neurological surgery retrieved from open-resource online documentation of the Ministry of Health and direct communication with Saudi Commission for Health Specialties (SCFHS) administrative services. Furthermore, regional neurosurgery program directors, four active registered consultants, were either interviewed live or through offline communications. Data on the current number of board-certified, active female neurosurgeons in either the government or private sectors, along with the number of current neurosurgery postgraduate residency program trainees, were obtained from the registered database of the SCFHS. Since 2002, 18 women (29 %) have graduated from the Saudi Neurosurgical Residency Training Program (SNRTP), in contrast,71 % of the graduates were male. The SNRTP is now training more than 34 females (30 %), who are progressing in their neurosurgical training across the country. The first Saudi woman to pursue neurosurgery was Dr Samia Abdel-Rahim Maimani, while the first woman to pass the Saudi Neurosurgery Board was Dr Aisha Al-Hajjaj in 2002. In 2021, board-certified female neurosurgeons in Saudi Arabia will represent approximately 3 % of all practicing neurosurgeons.

Dementia literacy and familiarity with term dementia: An exploratory study from a psychiatry outpatient setting.

Objectives: Dementia, often misperceived as an inherent facet of aging, is, in fact, a progressive neurodegenerative condition. It carries a significant stigma due to its associated psychological and behavioral manifestations, leading to neglect and abuse within households. Studies reveal an alarming 90% treatment gap for dementia in India, largely due to limited knowledge about symptom recognition and accessing services. Thus, enhancing dementia literacy becomes crucial for early diagnosis and proper management. This study aims to assess dementia literacy and familiarity with the term "dementia" in a North Indian tertiary health-care setting. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study used a case vignette method among patients and their attendants at psychiatry outpatient setting in a tertiary care hospital. A validated Hindi-translated case vignette depicting a dementia patient was employed. The study gathered sociodemographic data, the case vignette, and three related questions. Participants read the vignette and provided answers. The analysis included 200 responses collected in 1 month. Results: Respondents predominantly associated the case's condition with memory issues, mental illness, and psychosocial factors. They suggested social support, a nurturing family environment, communal living, and consulting a doctor for the protagonist. Familiarity with "dementia" was at a mere 24%. Conclusion: Dementia literacy and awareness of "dementia" are notably low in our sample. Urgent efforts are required to enhance dementia awareness to facilitate timely prevention, early detection, and effective management.