Effect of replanning boost radiotherapy plan in locally advanced unresectable middle to lower thoracic esophageal cancer.

Thoracic bulky esophageal cancer shrinks during radiotherapy, changing the location and shape of the surrounding heart and lungs. The current study aimed to explore how replanning by volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) influences the target coverage and dose to organs at risk in locally advanced unresectable middle to lower thoracic esophageal cancer. We retrospectively collected CT simulation images of initial and boost radiotherapy plans for locally advanced unresectable thoracic esophageal cancer in 17 consecutive patients. First, we created boost plans of 20 Gy using 3DCRT and VMAT on the initially acquired CT images. Second, we replicated the process on CT images acquired after 20-40 Gy of radiotherapy. We then compared non-replanned boost radiotherapy plans with replanned boost plans. Replanned radiotherapy delivered more conformal doses to the target and reduced heart and lung doses. VMAT reduced more irradiated mean doses to the heart than 3DCRT in the case of replanning (1.7 and 1.1 Gy, p < 0.001). Replanning to accommodate tumor shrinkage during radiotherapy effectively lowers the irradiated doses to the heart and lungs in patients with locally advanced unresectable middle to lower thoracic esophageal cancer, especially those treated with VMAT.

Anatomical and dosimetric variations during volumetric modulated arc therapy in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma after induction therapy: Implications for adaptive radiation therapy.

Purpose: To investigate anatomical and dosimetric changes during volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) after induction therapy (IT) and explore characteristics of patients with notable variations. Materials and methods: From July 2021 to June 2023, 60 LA-NPC patients undergoing VMAT after IT were retrospectively recruited. Adaptive computed tomography (aCT), reconstructed from weekly cone-beam computed tomography(CBCT), facilitates recontouring and planning transplantation. Volume, dice similarity coefficients, and dose to target volumes and organs at risk(OARs) on planning CT(pCT) and aCT were compared to identify changing patterns. Multivariate logistic regression was used to investigate risk factors. Results: The volumes of PGTVnasopharynx (PGTVp), PGTVnode (PGTVn), ipsilateral and contralateral parotid glands decreased during VMAT, with reductions of 2.25 %, 6.98 %, 20.09 % and 18.00 %, respectively, at 30 fractions from baseline (P < 0.001). After 25 fractions, D99 and D95 of PGTVn decreased by 7.94 % and 4.18 % from baseline, respectively, while the Dmean of ipsilateral and contralateral parotid glands increased by 7.80 % and 6.50 %, marking the peak rates of dosimetric variations (P < 0.001). The dosimetric fluctuations in PGTVp, the brainstem, and the spinal cord remained within acceptable limits. Furthermore, an initial BMI ≥ 23.5 kg/m2 and not-achieving objective response (OR) after IT were regarded as risk factors for a remarkable PGTVn dose reduction in the later stages of VMAT. Conclusions: Replanning for post-IT LA-NPC patients appears reasonable at 25F during VMAT. Patients with an initial BMI ≥ 23.5 kg/m2 and not-achieving OR after IT should be considered for adaptive radiation therapy to stabilize the delivered dose.

Improved quality of life in head and neck cancer patients treated with modern arc radiotherapy techniques - A prospective longitudinal analysis.

Purpose: The present longitudinal study aimed to evaluate the potential impact of modern radiotherapy (RT) techniques on quality of life (QOL) in patients with head and neck (HNC) cancer. Materials and methods: In this single-center prospective study, participants were asked to complete QOL questionnaires that included the EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-H&N 35 and utility score by time trade-off (TTO) at three time points (2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months) after completion of RT. All patients were treated by modern RT techniques [volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) or helical tomotherapy (HT)]. Patients who developed recurrence or died before the 6-month follow-up were excluded. Linear mixed models with random intercepts for participants and restricted maximum likelihood estimates were used to assess the effect of our study variables (age, sex, primary site, cancer stage, treatment, radiation dose and radiation method). Overall changes in QOL, utility scores and symptom burdens at different time points were tested using paired t tests. Results: A total of 45 patients were recruited from 2022 to 2023. Those who completed the surveys at 2 weeks with at least 1 follow-up (30 patients, 67%) were enrolled in the final analysis. The majority of these 30 patients were men (76.7%), had oral cancer (40%), had stage III or IV disease (60%), received surgical intervention (63%) and were treated with chemoradiation (80%). A curative total dose of 66 to 70 Gy was delivered to 23 (76.7%) patients, half of whom received HT. Patients who received chemotherapy had significantly lower global QoL scales (mean difference, 27.94; 95% CI, 9.33-46.55; p=0.005). Global QOL, physical function, symptoms of sticky saliva, cough, feelings of illness and weight loss improved significantly between 2 weeks and 3 months. There was no significant difference between 3 and 6 months. Interestingly, improvements in social function, social contact, pain and nutrition reached significance at 6 months. Subgroup analysis revealed greater pain relief over time for patients who underwent HT (p=0.030). Moreover, patients who participated in swallowing rehabilitation programs had a greater decrease in nausea and vomiting (p=0.036). Conclusion: HNC patients treated with modern RT techniques experience improved QOL and physical function over time. The most significant improvement occurs between 2 weeks and 3 months, after which the improvement plateaus. However, social function, social contact, pain and nutrition may require longer recovery intervals after treatment. HT with daily image guidance could provide a therapeutic opportunity for improving pain relief in patients with HNC.

Non-coplanar Arc-Involved Beam Arrangement With Sufficient Arc Rotations Is Suitable for Volumetric-Modulated Arc-Based Radiosurgery for Single Brain Metastasis.

Introduction In linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) leveraging a multileaf collimator (MLC) for brain metastasis (BM), volumetric-modulated arcs (VMAs) enable the generation of a suitable dose distribution with efficient planning and delivery. However, the arc arrangement, including the number of arcs, allocation, and rotation ranges, varies substantially among devices and facilities. Some modalities allow coplanar arc(s) (CA(s)) or beam(s) alone, and some facilities only use them intentionally despite the availability of non-coplanar arcs (NCAs). The study was conducted to examine the significance of NCAs and the optimal arc rotation ranges in VMA-based SRS for a single BM. Materials and methods This was a planning study for the clinical scenario of a single BM, including 20 clinical cases with a gross tumor volume (GTV) of 0.72-44.30 cc. Three different arc arrangements were compared: 1) reciprocating double CA alone of each 360º rotation with different collimator angles of 0 and 90º, 2) one CA and two NCAs of each 120º rotation with the shortest beam path lengths to the irradiation isocenter (NCA_L), and 3) one CA of 360º rotation and two NCAs of each 180º rotation (NCA_F). The three arcs were allocated similarly to equally divide the cranial hemisphere with different collimator angles of 0, 45, and 90º. Three VMA-based SRS plans were generated for each GTV using a 5 mm leaf-width MLC with the identical optimization method that prioritized the steepness of dose gradient outside the GTV boundary without any constraints to the GTV internal dose. A prescribed dose was uniformly assigned to the GTV D V-0.01 cc, the minimum dose of GTV minus 0.01 cc. The GTV dose conformity, the steepness of dose gradients both outside and inside the GTV boundary, the degree of concentric lamellarity of the dose gradients, and the appropriateness of the dose attenuation margin outside the GTV boundary were evaluated using metrics appropriate for each. Results The arc arrangements including NCAs showed significantly steeper dose gradients both outside and inside the GTV boundary with smaller dose attenuation margins than the CAs alone, while NCAs showed no significant advantage on the GTV dose conformity. In the NCA-involved arc arrangements, the NCA_F was significantly superior to the NCA_L in terms of the GTV dose conformity, the steepness of dose gradient outside the GTV, the degree of concentric lamellarity of the dose gradients outside and inside the GTV boundary, and the appropriateness of dose attenuation margin. However, the NCA_F showed no significant advantage on the steepness of dose increase inside the GTV boundary over the NCA_L. The dose increase just inside the prescribed isodose surface to the GTV boundary was significantly steeper with the NCA_L than the NCA_F. Conclusions In VMA-based SRS for a single BM, an arc arrangement including NCAs is indispensable, and sufficient arc rotations are suitable for achieving a dose distribution that maximizes therapeutic efficacy and safety in comparison to limited ones which are appropriate for dynamic conformal arcs. Although VMA with CAs alone can provide a non-inferior GTV dose conformity to NCAs, CA(s) alone should be applied only to situations where shorter irradiation time is prioritized over efficacy and safety.

Effect of body contour changes on the setup and dosimetric accuracy of radiotherapy after cervical cancer surgery.

Purpose: The body contour of patients with cervical cancer is prone to change between radiotherapy sessions. This study aimed to investigate the effect of body contour changes on the setup and dosimetric accuracy of radiotherapy. Methods: 15 patients with cervical cancer after surgery were randomly selected for retrospective analysis. The body contours on the once-per-week cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) were registered to the planning CT (pCT) for subsequent evaluation. A body contour conformity index (CIbody) was defined to quantify the variation of body changes. The body volume measured by CBCT was collected, and its relative difference in reference with the first CBCT was calculated and denoted by ΔVn. The relative setup errors, denoted by ΔSELR, ΔSEAP, ΔSESI, and ΔSEvec for left-right, anterior-posterior, superior-inferior, and vectorial shifts, respectively, were defined as the difference in measured setup errors between the reference and following CBCTs. The planned dose was calculated on the basis of virtual CT generated from CBCT and pCT by altering the CT body contour to fit the body on CBCT without deformable registration. The correlations between body contour changes and relative setup errors as well as dosimetric parameters were evaluated using Spearman's correlation coefficient rs . Results: CIbody was found to be negatively correlated with the superior-inferior and vectorial relative setup errors ΔSESI (rs = -0.448, p = 0.001) and ΔSEvec (rs = -0.387, p = 0.002), and no significant correlation was found between relative setup errors and ΔVn. Moreover, ΔVn was negatively correlated with ΔD2 (rs = -0.829, p < 0.001), ΔD98 (rs = -0.797, p < 0.001), and ΔTVPIV (rs = -0.819, p < 0.001). ΔD2, ΔD98, and ΔTVPIV were negatively correlated with ΔVn (p < 0.005). No correlation was found for other examined dosimetric parameters. Conclusion: The body contour change of patients could be associated with the setup variability. The effect of body contour changes on dose distribution is minimal. The extent of body change could be used as a metric for radiation therapists to estimate the setup errors.

Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for High-Risk and Very High-Risk Locoregional Prostate Cancer in the Modern Era: Real-World Experience from an Asian Cohort.

This study retrospectively evaluates the clinical outcomes of definitive volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for high-risk or very high-risk locoregional prostate cancer patients from an Asian institution. Consecutive patients who received VMAT (76 Gy in 38 fractions) between January 2017 and June 2022 were included. Whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) (46 Gy in 23 fractions) was employed for clinically node-negative disease (cN0) and a Roach estimated risk of ≥15%, as well as simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) of 55-57.5 Gy to node-positive (cN1) disease. The primary endpoint was biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS). Secondary endpoints included radiographic relapse-free survival (RRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS) and prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS). A total of 209 patients were identified. After a median follow-up of 47.5 months, the 4-year actuarial BRFS, RRFS, MFS and PCSS were 85.2%, 96.8%, 96.8% and 100%, respectively. The incidence of late grade ≥ 2 genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity were 15.8% and 11.0%, respectively. No significant difference in cancer outcomes or toxicity was observed between WPRT and prostate-only radiotherapy for cN0 patients. SIB to the involved nodes did not result in increased toxicity. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) group 5 and cN1 stage were associated with worse RRFS (p < 0.05). PSMA PET-CT compared to conventional imaging staging was associated with better BRFS in patients with ISUP grade group 5 (p = 0.039). Five-year local experience demonstrates excellent clinical outcomes. PSMA PET-CT staging for high-grade disease and tailored pelvic irradiation based on nodal risk should be considered to maximize clinical benefit.

Evaluation of deep learning based dose prediction in head and neck cancer patients using two different types of input contours.

PURPOSE: This study evaluates deep learning (DL) based dose prediction methods in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients using two types of input contours. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-five HNC patients undergoing two-step volumetric-modulated arc therapy were included. Dose prediction was performed using the AIVOT prototype (AiRato.Inc, Sendai, Japan), a commercial software with an HD U-net-based dose distribution prediction system. Models were developed for the initial plan (46 Gy/23Fr) and boost plan (24 Gy/12Fr), trained with 65 cases and tested with 10 cases. The 8-channel model used one target (PTV) and seven organs at risk (OARs), while the 10-channel model added two dummy contours (PTV ring and spinal cord PRV). Predicted and deliverable doses, obtained through dose mimicking on another radiation treatment planning system, were evaluated using dose-volume indices for PTV and OARs. RESULTS: For the initial plan, both models achieved approximately 2% prediction accuracy for the target dose and maintained accuracy within 3.2 Gy for OARs. The 10-channel model outperformed the 8-channel model for certain dose indices. For the boost plan, both models exhibited prediction accuracies of approximately 2% for the target dose and 1 Gy for OARs. The 10-channel model showed significantly closer predictions to the ground truth for D50% and Dmean. Deliverable plans based on prediction doses showed little significant difference compared to the ground truth, especially for the boost plan. CONCLUSION: DL-based dose prediction using the AIVOT prototype software in HNC patients yielded promising results. While additional contours may enhance prediction accuracy, their impact on dose mimicking is relatively small.

Optimum delineation of skin structure for dose calculation with the linear Boltzmann transport equation algorithm in radiotherapy treatment planning.

This study investigated the effectiveness of placing skin-ring structures to enhance the precision of skin dose calculations in patients who had undergone head and neck volumetric modulated arc therapy using the Acuros XB algorithm. The skin-ring structures in question were positioned 2 mm below the skin surface (skin A) and 1 mm above and below the skin surface (skin B) within the treatment-planning system. These structures were then tested on both acrylic cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms and compared with the Gafchromic EBT3 film (EBT3). The results revealed that the maximum dose differences between skins A and B for the cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms were approximately 12% and 2%, respectively. In patients 1 and 2, the dose differences between skins A and B were 9.2% and 8.2%, respectively. Ultimately, demonstrated that the skin-dose calculation accuracy of skin B was within 2% and did not impact the deep organs.

Effects of electron density force to 1.0 and fill to 1.0 on VMAT treatment plans for lung SBRT.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to determine the effect of forcing and filling the electron density (ED) to 1.0 of the planning target volume (PTV) overdose distribution in lung SBRT treatment leading to shortening patient treatment time and increasing patient comfort by reducing MU/fraction due to ED manipulation effect. METHODS: In this study, 36 lung SBRT plans of 12 suitable patients who prescribed a total dose of 50 Gy in five fractions were generated with Monaco v.5.10 TPS using the Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique by PTV ED values forcing as well as filling to 1.0 and comparatively assessed. The first group of plans was created by using the patient's original ED, second and third groups of plans were reoptimized by forcing and filling the ED of PTV to 1.0, respectively, therefore acquiring a new dose distribution which lead to comparatively assessment the effects of changes in ED on PTV and OAR doses. RESULTS: Assessment of treatment plans revealed that mean MU/fx numbers were decreased by 76% and 75.25% between Groups 1 and 2, Groups 1 and 3, respectively. The number of segments was also reduced in Group 1 by up to 15% compared with Groups 2 and 3. Maximum HI and CI differences for PTV between Groups 1 and 2 were less than 1% and Groups 1 and 3 were 1.5% which indicates all 3 group plans were comparable in terms of dose distribution within PTV. CONCLUSIONS: Forcing and filling the ED of PTV to 1.0 strategy has provided reduced a number of segments and MU/fx without a significant change in PTV mean and maximum doses, thereby decreasing treatment time and patient discomfort during treatment. This process should be considered in line of a potential number of patients as well as prescribed dose and MU/fx numbers.

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Proton Beam Therapy Compared to Conventional Radiotherapy in Non-Metastatic Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes.

Background and Objectives: Conventional radiotherapies used in the current management of rectal cancer commonly cause iatrogenic radiotoxicity. Proton beam therapy has emerged as an alternative to conventional radiotherapy with the aim of improving tumour control and reducing off-set radiation exposure to surrounding tissue. However, the real-world treatment and oncological outcomes associated with the use of proton beam therapy in rectal cancer remain poorly characterised. This systematic review seeks to evaluate the radiation dosages and safety of proton beam therapy compared to conventional radiotherapy in patients with non-metastatic rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: A computer-assisted search was performed on the Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central databases. Studies that evaluated the adverse effects and oncological outcomes of proton beam therapy and conventional radiotherapy in adult patients with non-metastatic rectal cancer were included. Results: Eight studies were included in this review. There was insufficient evidence to determine the adverse treatment outcomes of proton beam therapy versus conventional radiotherapy. No current studies assessed radiotoxicities nor oncological outcomes. Pooled dosimetric comparisons between proton beam therapy and various conventional radiotherapies were associated with reduced radiation exposure to the pelvis, bowel and bladder. Conclusions: This systematic review demonstrates a significant paucity of evidence in the current literature surrounding adverse effects and oncological outcomes related to proton beam therapy compared to conventional radiotherapy for non-metastatic rectal cancer. Pooled analyses of dosimetric studies highlight greater predicted radiation-sparing effects with proton beam therapy in this setting. This evidence, however, is based on evidence at a moderate risk of bias and clinical heterogeneity. Overall, more robust, prospective clinical trials are required.

Consideration of Optimal Evaluation Metrics for Internal Gross Tumor Dose Relevant to Tumor Response in Multi-fraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Brain Metastasis.

Introduction In stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastasis (BM), the target dose inhomogeneity remains highly variable among modalities, irradiation techniques, and facilities, which can affect tumor response during and after multi-fraction SRS. Volumetric-modulated arcs (VMAs) can provide a concentrically-layered steep dose increase inside a gross tumor volume (GTV) boundary compared to dynamic conformal arcs. This study was conducted to review the optimal evaluation method for the internal GTV doses relevant to maximal response and local control, specifically to examine the significance of the doses 2 mm and 4 mm inside the GTV boundary in VMA-based SRS. Materials and methods This was a planning study for the clinical scenario of a single BM and targeted 25 GTVs of >0.50 cc, including eight spherical models with diameters of 10-45 mm and 17 clinical BMs (GTV: 0.72-44.33 cc). SRS plans were generated for each GTV using VMA with a 5-mm leaf-width multileaf collimator and the optimization that prioritized the steepness of the dose gradient outside the GTV boundary without any internal dose constraints. The dose prescription and evaluation were based on the GTV D V-0.01 cc, a minimum dose of GTV minus 0.01 cc. Two planning systems were compared for the GTV - 2 mm and GTV - 4 mm structures that were generated by equally reducing 2 mm and 4 mm from the GTV surface. The D eIIVs, a minimum dose of the irradiated isodose volume equivalent to the GTV - 2 mm and GTV - 4 mm, were compared to other common metrics. Results The GTV - 2 mm and GTV - 4 mm volumes differed significantly between the systems. In the spherical GTVs, the irradiated isodose surfaces of GTV D 80% and D 50% corresponded to 0.4-1.6 mm (<2 mm) and 1.0-4.6 mm inside the GTV boundary, respectively. In the 25 GTVs, the GTV - 2 mm coverage with the D eIIV varied from 83.7% to 98.2% (95-98% in 68% of the cases), while the GTV coverage with the GTV - 2 mm D eIIV was 20.2-75.9%. In the 23 GTVs of ≥1.26 cc, the GTV coverage with the GTV - 4 mm D eIIV varied from 1.9% to 55.6% (<50% in 87% of the cases). No significant difference was observed between the GTV D 50% and the GTV - 2 mm D eIIV, while the GTV - 4 mm D eIIV was significantly higher than the GTV D 50%. No significant correlations were observed between the GTV D 50% and the D eIIVs of the GTV - 2 mm and GTV - 4 mm. Conclusions The doses 2 mm and 4 mm inside a GTV have low correlations with the GTV D 50% and may be more relevant to maximal response and local control for SRS of BM. The D eIIV instead of the minimum dose of a fixed % coverage (e.g. D 98%) is suitable for reporting the doses 2 mm and 4 mm inside the GTV boundary in terms of avoiding the over- or under-coverage, with consideration to substantial variability in minus margin addition functions among planning systems. In VMA-based SRS with a steep dose gradient, the doses 2-4 mm inside a GTV decrease significantly as the GTV increases, which can attenuate the excessive dose exposure to the surrounding brain in a large BM due to the GTV shrinkage during multi-fraction SRS.

Quantification of Treatment Plan Deliverability in Breast Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy With Agility Multi-leaf Collimator.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim was to assess the complexity of breast volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans using various indices and to evaluate their performance through gamma analysis in predicting plan deliverability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 285 VMAT plans for 260 patients were created using the VersaHD™ linear accelerator with a Monaco treatment planning system. Corresponding verification plans were generated using the ArcCHECK® detector, and gamma analysis was conducted employing various criteria. Twenty-eight plan complexity metrics were computed, and Pearson's correlation coefficients were determined between the gamma passing rate (GPR) and these metrics. RESULTS: The average GPR values for all plans were 97.7%, 89.9%, and 78.0% for the 2 mm/2%, 1 mm/2%, and 1 mm/1% criteria, respectively. While most complexity metrics exhibited weak correlations with GPRs under the 2 mm/2% criterion, leaf sequence variability (LSV), plan-averaged beam area (PA), converted area metric (CAM), and edge area metric (EAM) demonstrated the most robust performance, with Pearson's correlation coefficients of 0.57, 0.50, -0.70, and -0.56, respectively. CONCLUSION: Metrics related to beam aperture size and irregularity, such as LSV, PA, CAM and EAM, proved to be reasonable predictors of plan deliverability in breast VMAT.

Deep learning for patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy: Prediction accuracy and cost-sensitive classification performance.

PURPOSE: To evaluate a deep learning model's performance in predicting and classifying patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) results for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), aiming to streamline PSQA workflows and reduce the onsite measurement workload. METHODS: A total of 761 VMAT plans were analyzed using 3D-MResNet to process multileaf collimator images and monitor unit data, with the gamma passing rate (GPR) as the output. Thresholds for the predicted GPR (Th-p) and measured GPR (Th-m) were established to aid in PSQA decision-making, using cost curves and error rates to assess classification performance. RESULTS: The mean absolute errors of the model for the test set were 1.63 % and 2.38 % at 3 %/2 mm and 2 %/2 mm, respectively. For the classification of the PSQA results, Th-m was 88.3 % at 2 %/2 mm and 93.3 % at 3 %/2 mm. The lowest cost-sensitive error rates of 0.0127 and 0.0925 were obtained when Th-p was set as 91.2 % at 2 %/2 mm and 96.4 % at 3 %/2 mm, respectively. Additionally, the 2 %/2 mm classifier also achieved a lower total expected cost of 0.069 compared with 0.110 for the 3 %/2 mm classifier. The deep learning classifier under the 2 %/2 mm gamma criterion had a sensitivity and specificity of 100 % (10/10) and 83.5 % (167/200), respectively, for the test set. CONCLUSIONS: The developed 3D-MResNet model can accurately predict and classify PSQA results based on VMAT plans. The introduction of a deep learning model into the PSQA workflow has considerable potential for improving the VMAT PSQA process and reducing workloads.

Dosimetric effect of collimator rotation on intensity modulated radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy for rectal cancer radiotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) are the main radiotherapy techniques for treating and managing rectal cancer. Collimator rotation is one of the crucial parameters in radiotherapy planning, and its alteration can cause dosimetric variations. This study assessed the effect of collimator rotation on the dosimetric results of various IMRT and VMAT plans for rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) images of 20 male patients with rectal cancer were utilized for IMRT and VMAT treatment planning with various collimator angles. Nine different IMRT techniques (5, 7, and 9 coplanar fields with collimator angles of 0°, 45°, and 90°) and six different VMAT techniques (1 and 2 full coplanar arcs with collimator angles of 0°, 45°, and 90°) were planned for each patient. The dosimetric results of various treatment techniques for target tissue (conformity index [CI] and homogeneity index [HI]) and organs at risk (OARs) sparing (parameters obtained from OARs dose-volume histograms [DVH]) as well as radiobiological findings were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: The 7-fields IMRT technique demonstrated lower bladder doses (V40Gy, V45Gy), unaffected by collimator rotation. The 9-fields IMRT and 2-arcs VMAT (excluding the 90-degree collimator) had the lowest V35Gy and V45Gy. A 90-degree collimator rotation in 2-arcs VMAT significantly increased small bowel and bladder V45Gy, femoral head doses, and HI values. Radiobiologically, the 90-degree rotation had adverse effects on small bowel NTCP (normal tissue complication probability). No superiority was found for a 45-degree collimator rotation over 0 or 30 degrees in VMAT techniques. CONCLUSION: Collimator rotation had minimal impact on dosimetric parameters in IMRT planning but is significant in VMAT techniques. A 90-degree rotation in VMAT, particularly in a 2-full arc technique, adversely affects PTV homogeneity index, bladder dose, and small bowel NTCP. Other evaluated collimator angles did not significantly affect VMAT dosimetrical or radiobiological outcomes.

Setup errors analysis in iterative kV CBCT: A clinical study of cervical cancer treated with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to analyze setup errors in pelvic Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) for patients with non-surgical primary cervical cancer, utilizing the onboard iterative kV cone beam CT (iCBCT) imaging system on the Varian Halcyon 2.0 ring gantry structure accelerator to enhance radiotherapy precision. METHOD: We selected 132 cervical cancer patients who underwent VMAT with daily iCBCT imaging guidance. Before each treatment session, a registration method based on the bony structure was employed to acquire iCBCT images with the corresponding planning CT images. Following verification and adjustment of image registration results along the three axes (but not rotational), setup errors in the lateral (X-axis), longitudinal (Y-axis), and vertical (Z-axis) directions were recorded for each patient. Subsequently, we analyzed 3642 iCBCT image setup errors. RESULTS: The mean setup errors for the X, Y, and Z axes were 4.50 ± 3.79 mm, 6.08 ± 6.30 mm, and 1.48 ± 2.23 mm, respectively. Before correction with iCBCT, setup margins based on the Van Herk formula for the X, Y, and Z axes were 6.28, 12.52, and 3.26 mm, respectively. In individuals aged 60 years and older, setup errors in the X and Y axes were significantly larger than those in the younger group (p < 0.05). Additionally, there is no significant linear correlation between setup errors and treatment fraction numbers. CONCLUSION: Data analysis underscores the importance of precise Y-axis setup for cervical cancer patients undergoing VMAT. Radiotherapy centers without daily iCBCT should appropriately extend the planning target volume (PTV) along the Y-axis for cervical cancer patients receiving pelvic VMAT. Elderly patients exhibit significantly larger setup errors compared to younger counterparts. In conclusion, iCBCT-guided radiotherapy is recommended for cervical cancer patients undergoing VMAT to improve setup precision.

Evaluation of the toxicity of prophylactic extended-field radiation therapy with volumetric modulated arc therapy in combination with concomitant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced stage IIIC1r cervical cancer according to the 2018 FIGO classification.

Background: To evaluate the toxicity of prophylactic extended-field radiation therapy (EFRT) combined with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in combination with cisplatin chemotherapy for locally advanced stage IIIC1r cervical cancer [2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO)]. Materials and methods: Thirty patients with stage IIIC1r cervical cancer were treated with EFRT combined with concurrent cisplatin. Acute toxicities were evaluated according to the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE v.5). Delayed toxicities were evaluated according to the classification criteria of radiation damage toxicity of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG). The efficacy of the regimens was evaluated using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST v1.1). Spearman correlation was used to analyze the correlation between acute gastrointestinal toxicity (nausea) and the small bowel V45. Predictive value analysis was performed using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: There were no grade ≥ 3 acute toxicities. The most common acute toxicity observed was nausea (grade 2 in 40%), which was positively correlated with the volume of the small intestine receiving 45 Gy. When the V45 of the small intestine was > 83.2 cc, the risk of grade 2 acute upper digestive tract toxicity (nausea) increased. The major late toxicities had the following distributions: Grade 1 diarrhea, 36.7%; Grade 1 abdominal pain, 13.3%; and Grade 1 radiation cystitis. No grade ≥ 2 late toxicities were observed. Conclusions: Treatment of locally advanced stage IIIC1r cervical cancer with EFRT combined with VMAT and concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy was well tolerated, and the acute toxicity profile was acceptable. Significant grade 3 acute/delayed toxicities were not observed.

Radiobiological analysis of VMAT treatment plan with flattened and flattening filter free photon beam: an EUD and TCP based comparative study.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the dosimetric and radiobiological differences between 6MV flattened filter (FF) and flattening filter free (FFF) using volumetric modulated arc (VMAT) technique for head and neck (H&N) cancer patients. Materials and methods: Fifteen patients with H&N carcinoma were selected and treated with VMAT with FF (VMATFF) treatment plan. Retrospectively, additional VMAT treatment plans were developed using FFF beams (VMATFFF). Radiobiological parameters, such as equivalent uniform dose (EUD), tumor cure probability (TCP), and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), were calculated using Niemierko's model for both VMATFF and VMATFFF. Correlation between dosimetric and radiobiological data were analyzed and compared. Results: The conformity index (CI) was 0.975 ± 0.014 (VMATFF) and 0.964 ± 0. 019 (VMATFFF) with p ≥ 0.05. Statistically, there was an insignificant difference in the planning target volume (PTV) results for TCP (%) values, with values of 81.20 ± 0.88% (VMATFF) and 81.01 ± 0.92 (%) (VMATFF). Similarly, there was an insignificant difference in the EUD (Gy) values, which were 71.53 ± 0.33 Gy (VMATFF) and 71.46 ± 0.34 Gy (VMATFFF). The NTCP values for the spinal cord, left parotid, and right parotid were 6.54 × 10-07%, 8.04%, and 7.69%, respectively, in the case of VMATFF. For VMATFFF, the corresponding NTCP values for the spinal cord, parotids left, and parotid right were 3.09 × 10-07%, 6.57%, and 6.73%, respectively. Conclusion: The EUD and Mean Dose to PTV were strongly correlated for VMATFFF. An increased mean dose to the PTV and greater TCP were reported for the VMATFF, which can enhance the delivery of the therapeutic dose to the target.

Evaluation of the Minimum Segment Width and Fluence Smoothing Tools for Intensity-modulated Techniques in Monaco Treatment Planning System.

Purpose: This study aims to minimize monitor units (MUs) of intensity-modulated treatments in the Monaco treatment planning system while preserving plan quality by optimizing the "Minimum Segment Width" (MSW) and "Fluence Smoothing" parameters. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 30 prostate, 30 gynecological, 15 breast cancer, 10 head and neck tumor, 11 radiosurgery, and 10 hypo-fractionated plans. Original prostate plans employed "Fluence Smoothing" = Off and were reoptimized with Low, Medium, and High settings. The remaining pathologies initially used MSW = 0.5 cm and were reoptimized with MSW = 1.0 cm. Plan quality, including total MU, delivery time, and dosimetric constraints, was statistically analyzed with a paired t-test. Results: Prostate plans exhibited the highest MU variation when changing "Fluence Smoothing" from Off to High (average ΔMU = -5.1%; P < 0.001). However, a High setting may increase overall MU when MSW = 0.5 cm. Gynecological plans changed substantially when MSW increased from 0.5 cm to 1.0 cm (average ΔMU = -29%; P < 0.001). Organs at risk sparing and planning target volumes remained within 1.2% differences. Replanning other pathologies with MSW = 1.0 cm affected breast and head and neck tumor plans (average ΔMU = -168.38, average Δt = -11.74 s, and average ΔMU = -256.56, average Δt = -15.05 s, respectively; all with P < 0.004). Radiosurgery and hypofractioned highly modulated plans did not yield statistically significant results. Conclusions: In breast, pelvis, head and neck, and prostate plans, starting with MSW = 1.0 cm optimally reduces MU and treatment time without compromising plan quality. MSW has a greater impact on MU than the "Fluence Smoothing" parameter. Plans with high modulation might present divergent behavior, requiring a case-specific analysis with MSW values higher than 0.5 cm.

Modeling of Gamma Index for Prediction of Pretreatment Quality Assurance in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy of the Liver.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a predictive model to evaluate pretreatment patient-specific quality assurance (QA) based on treatment planning parameters for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for liver carcinoma. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively selected 180 cases of liver SBRT treated using the volumetric modulated arc therapy technique. Numerous parameters defining the plan complexity were calculated from the DICOM-RP (Radiotherapy Plan) file using an in-house program developed in MATLAB. Patient-specific QA was performed with global gamma evaluation criteria of 2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm in a relative mode using the Octavius two-dimensional detector array. Various statistical tests and multivariate predictive models were evaluated. Results: The leaf speed (MILS) and planning target volume size showed the highest correlation with the gamma criteria of 2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm (P < 0.05). Degree of modulation (DoM), MCSSPORT, leaf speed (MILS), and gantry speed (MIGS) were predictors of global gamma pass rate (GPR) for 2%/2 mm (G22), whereas DoM, MCSSPORT, leaf speed (MILS) and robust decision making were predictors of the global GPR criterion of 3%/3 mm (G33). The variance inflation factor values of all predictors were <2, indicating that the data were not associated with each other. For the G22 prediction, the sensitivity and specificity of the model were 75.0% and 75.0%, respectively, whereas, for G33 prediction, the sensitivity and specificity of the model were 74.9% and 85.7%%, respectively. Conclusions: The model was potentially beneficial as an easy alternative to pretreatment QA in predicting the uncertainty in plan deliverability at the planning stage and could help reduce resources in busy clinics.