[Pain relief after abdominal oncologic surgery. Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of a fixed combination of diclofenac and orphenadrine]. / Obezbolivanie posle abdominal'nykh onkokhirurgicheskikh vmeshatel'stv. Otsenka effektivnosti i perenosimosti fiksirovannoi kombinatsii diklofenaka i orfenadrina.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the analgesic, opioid-sparing, anti-inflammatory and adverse effects of the diclofenac and orphenadrine (Neodolpasse) fixed combination for analgesia in the postoperative period of surgical cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomized, single-center, prospective, comparative study evaluated two analgesic regimens in 40 cancer patients undergoing various open cavity surgeries, including extensive combined interventions associated with the resection of 3 or more organs. The study was conducted following the transfer from the ICU to the surgical department during the early activation period, within the first two postoperative days. In the first group N (n=20), "Neodolpasse" (a fixed combination of 75 mg Diclofenac and 30 mg Orphenadrine) was administered as an infusion, twice daily. In the second group K (n=20) analgesia was performed with ketoprofen as an intravenous infusion at a daily dose of 200 mg. Patients in both groups received scheduled prolonged epidural analgesia with 0.2% ropivacaine, and when the severity of pain in a visual analogue scale (VAS) increased to more than 40 mm, so an additional dose of 100 mg tramadol was administered intramuscularly. Daily measurments of blood creatinine level and C-reactive protein were taken, postoperative blood loss was accounted for, as well as postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS: The comparative analysis of the indicators of pain syndrome severity showed that the patients in group N exhibited a more pronounced analgesic effect, so on the second postoperative day 30% of patients reported moderate pain (from 50 to 60 mm on the pain scale), on the third day - 15%, and by the fourth day - all 100% of patients experienced pain of low intensity. The additional analgesia with tramadol in group N was required twice less than in the comparison group, and such adverse effects as nausea, drowsiness, and weakness were significantly more common in the ketoprofen group. In both groups, the average blood creatinine level did not exceed permissible values, and the C-reactive protein was elevated at all stages of the study but tended to decrease by the fourth day. The analysis of postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo scale at the time of discharge did not reveal a direct correlation between the occurred complications and the use of NSAIDs. Adverse effects such as anastomotic failure, gastrointestinal complications, or other hemorrhagic manifestations were not recorded. CONCLUSION: The inclusion of Neodolpasse into multimodal analgesic regimens resulted in the most pronounced analgesic and opioid-sparing effects in surgical cancer patients using laparotomy access. Additionally, the application of short courses of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) was associated with a favorable safety profile.

Comprehensive analysis of diagnosis and treatment in 99 cases of abdominal Schwannoma.

PURPOSE: Schwannoma is a rare mesenchymal tumor. In this study, we analyzed clinicopathologically 99 schwannomas.This retrospective study delves into the clinical, pathological, and immunohistochemical dimensions of abdominal schwannomas. RESULTS: A cohort of 99 cases, comprising 4 malignant and 95 benign schwannomas, was meticulously examined. Clinical analysis revealed a notable gender distribution (1:1.7, male to female) and an average age of 58.5 years. The majority of cases were asymptomatic. A cohort of 99 cases, comprising 4 malignant and 95 benign schwannomas, was meticulously examined. Clinical analysis revealed a notable gender distribution (1:1.7, male to female) and an average age of 58.5 years. The majority of cases were asymptomatic. Tumor sizes ranged from 0.5 to 30 cm, with distinct locations in the stomach for most benign cases and the abdomen/small intestine for malignancies. Initial misdiagnoses were frequent. Pathological evaluations revealed distinct features, including Antoni A and B patterns, spindle cells, and lymphatic sheath structures in benign schwannomas. Malignant cases exhibited atypical cells, ulcers, and invasive growth. Immunohistochemical markers, such as S100, SOX10, and vimentin, consistently demonstrated positivity by contributing to accurate diagnoses. Treatment outcomes indicated a poor prognosis in malignant cases, with overall survival ranging from 10 to 41 months. Conversely, benign cases displayed no recurrence or metastasis during follow-up, despite atypical behaviors. CONCLUSION: This study underscores the rarity of abdominal schwannomas and underscores the need for a comprehensive diagnostic morphology and immunohistochemistry. SOX10 emerges as a crucial and specific marker for accurate diagnosis. Further research is imperative to refine diagnostic protocols and enhance our understanding of the clinical behavior of abdominal schwannomas.

A giant solitary fibrous tumor of the abdominal pelvic cavity: A case report and literature review.

RATIONALE: Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is a rare mesenchymal tumor, especially the giant one from the abdominal pelvic cavity. We report on a rare case of a giant SFT of the abdominal pelvic cavity to review the existing literature in detail to improve the diagnosis and treatment of SFT. PATIENT CONCERNS: The patient is a 52-year-old female who presented with 2 weeks of abdominal distension. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging showed a giant mass (>20 cm) in the abdominal pelvic cavity, considered a mesenchymal tumor. She denies a history of tumor disease. DIAGNOSES: A whole abdomen bulge and a mass of about 18 cm × 10 cm on the right side and middle side were found in the physical examination after admission. Abdominal enhanced computed tomography revealed a giant cystic-solid mass located on the middle and right side of the abdominal pelvic cavity, measuring approximately 20.4 cm × 11.7 cm, with multiple cystic changes and necrosis and compression of adjacent organs and tissues, and marked inhomogeneous enhancement. INTERVENTIONS: The patient underwent an open abdominal pelvic cavity giant tumor operation to achieve a radical resection, and did not undergo chemotherapy or radiotherapy. OUTCOMES: The patient underwent open complete resection of a giant abdominal pelvic tumor with no complications and was diagnosed as SFT according to the pathology, immunohistochemistry showed that the tumor tested positive for CD34(+), STAT-6(+), and Ki-67 (10%). Abdominal computed tomography scans were performed 6 months after resection, and no signs of recurrence or metastasis were found. LESSONS: The clinical symptoms and imaging features of giant abdominal pelvic cavity SFT are not typical. Preoperative diagnosis is difficult and has the potential for malignancy. Based on the results of the current study, there is no standard treatment strategy around the world and the therapeutic effect of radiation therapy and chemotherapy is relatively limited. Thus, complete surgical resection and close clinical follow-up are advocated.

Testing of a risk-stratified patient decision aid to facilitate shared decision-making for extended postoperative thromboprophylaxis after major abdominal surgery for cancer.

BACKGROUND: Use of extended pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis after major abdominopelvic cancer surgery should depend on best-available scientific evidence and patients' informed preferences. We developed a risk-stratified patient decision aid to facilitate shared decision-making and sought to evaluate its effect on decision-making quality regarding use of extended thromboprophylaxis. METHODS: We enrolled patients undergoing major abdominopelvic cancer surgery at an academic tertiary care centre in this pre-post study. We evaluated change in decisional conflict, readiness to decide, decision-making confidence, and change in patient knowledge. Participants were provided the appropriate risk-stratified decision aid (according to their Caprini score) in either the preoperative or postoperative setting. A sample size calculation determined that we required 17 patients to demonstrate whether the decision aid meaningfully reduced decisional conflict. We used the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed ranks test for interval scaled measures. RESULTS: We included 17 participants. The decision aid significantly reduced decisional conflict (median decisional conflict score 2.37 [range 1.00-3.81] v. 1.3 [range 1.00-3.25], p < 0.01). With the decision aid, participants had high confidence (median 86.4 [range 15.91-100]) and felt highly prepared to make a decision (median 90 [range 55-100]). Median knowledge scores increased from 50% (range 0%-100%) to 75% (range 25%-100%). CONCLUSION: Our risk-stratified, evidence-based decision aid on extended thromboprophylaxis after major abdominopelvic surgery significantly improved decision-making quality. Further research is needed to evaluate the usability and feasibility of this decision aid in the perioperative setting.

Prognostic impact of tumor location and gene expression profile in sporadic desmoid tumor.

PURPOSE: Prognostic biomarkers remain necessary in sporadic desmoid tumor (DT) because the clinical course is unpredictable. DT location along with gene expression between thoracic and abdominal wall locations was analyzed. METHOD: Sporadic DT patients (GEIS Registry) diagnosed between 1982 and 2018 who underwent upfront surgery were enrolled retrospectively in this study. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS). Additionally, the gene expression profile was analyzed in DT localized in the thoracic or abdominal wall, harboring the most frequent CTNNB1 T41A mutation. RESULTS: From a total of 454 DT patients, 197 patients with sporadic DT were selected. The median age was 38.2 years (1.8-89.1) with a male/female distribution of 33.5/66.5. Most of them harbored the CTNNB1 T41A mutation (71.6 %), followed by S45F (17.8 %) and S45P (4.1 %). A significant worse median RFS was associated with males (p = 0.019), tumor size ≥ 6 cm (p = 0.001), extra-abdominal DT location (p < 0.001) and the presence of CTNNB1 S45F mutation (p = 0.013). In the multivariate analysis, extra-abdominal DT location, CTNNB1 S45F mutation and tumor size were independent prognostic biomarkers for worse RFS. DTs harboring the CTNNB1 T41A mutation showed overexpression of DUSP1, SOCS1, EGR1, FOS, LIF, MYC, SGK1, SLC2A3, and IER3, and underexpression of BMP4, PMS2, HOXA9, and WISP1 in thoracic versus abdominal wall locations. CONCLUSION: Sporadic DT location exhibits a different prognosis in terms of RFS favoring the abdominal wall compared to extra-abdominal sites. A differential gene expression profile under the same CTNNB1 T41A mutation is observed in the abdominal wall versus the thoracic wall, mainly affecting the Wnt/ß-catenin, TGFß, IFN, and TNF pathways.

Impact of geometric correction on echo-planar imaging-based apparent diffusion coefficient maps for abdominal radiotherapy.

Objective. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) extracted from diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) is a potential biomarker in radiotherapy (RT). DWI is often implemented with an echo-planar imaging (EPI) read-out due to speed, but unfortunately low geometric accuracy follows. This study aimed to investigate the influence of geometric distortions on the ADCs extracted from the gross tumor volume (GTV) and on the shape of the GTV in abdominal EPI-DWI.Approach. Twenty-one patients had EPI-DWI scans on a 1.5 T MRI sim before treatment and on a 1.5 T MRI-Linac at one of the first treatment fractions. Off-resonance correction with and without eddy current correction were applied to ADC maps. The clinical GTVs were deformed based on the same (but inverted) corrections to assess the local-regional geometric influence of distortions. Mean surface distance (MSD), Hausdorff distance (HD), and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) were calculated to compare the original and distorted GTVs, and ADC values were calculated based on a mono-exponential model. Phantom measurements were performed to validate the applied correction method.Main results. The median (range) ADC change within the GTV after full distortion correction was 1.3% (0.02%-6.9%) for MRI-Sim and 1.5% (0.1%-6.4%) for MRI-Linac. The additional effect of the eddy current correction was small in both systems. The median (range) MSD, HD, and DSC comparing the original and off-resonance distorted GTVs for all patients were 0.43 mm (0.11-0.94 mm), 4.00 mm (1.00-7.81 mm) and 0.93 (0.82-0.99), respectively.Significance. Overall effect of distortion correction was small in terms of derived ADC values, indicating that distortion correction is unimportant for prediction of outcomes based on ADC. However, large local geometric changes occurred after off-resonance distortion correction for some patients, suggesting that if the spatial information from ADC maps is to be used for dose painting strategies, corrections should be applied.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Gastric Volume Measurement in a Pediatric Patient-Look Beyond the Antrum: A Case Report.

Gastric ultrasound estimates stomach contents in perioperative patients. A 10-year-old boy with abdominal rhabdomyosarcoma, who received abdominal radiation, developed gastroparesis and was scheduled for endoscopic gastrointestinal pyloric dilation. Point-of-care gastric ultrasound revealed gastric antral cross-sectional area of 6.5 cm2 (estimated gastric content ~30 mL). However, dynamic right-to-left ultrasound revealed more hypoechoic material in the fundus of the stomach. On induction ~125 mL of stomach contents was suctioned. Antral measurements may not accurately predict the stomach contents in the setting of a stiff/fixed antrum. Scanning from antrum to fundus determined contents more accurately, especially with a prior history of abdominal radiation.

Towards accurate abdominal tumor segmentation: A 2D model with Position-Aware and Key Slice Feature Sharing.

Abdominal tumor segmentation is a crucial yet challenging step during the screening and diagnosis of tumors. While 3D segmentation models provide powerful performance, they demand substantial computational resources. Additionally, in 3D data, tumors often represent a small portion, leading to imbalanced data and potentially overlooking crucial information. Conversely, 2D segmentation models have a lightweight structure, but disregard the inter-slice correlation, risking the loss of tumor in edge slices. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a novel Position-Aware and Key Slice Feature Sharing 2D tumor segmentation model (PAKS-Net). Leveraging the Swin-Transformer, we effectively model the global features within each slice, facilitating essential information extraction. Furthermore, we introduce a Position-Aware module to capture the spatial relationship between tumors and their corresponding organs, mitigating noise and interference from surrounding organ tissues. To enhance the edge slice segmentation accuracy, we employ key slices to assist in the segmentation of other slices to prioritize tumor regions. Through extensive experiments on three abdominal tumor segmentation CT datasets and a lung tumor segmentation CT dataset, PAKS-Net demonstrates superior performance, reaching 0.893, 0.769, 0.598 and 0.738 tumor DSC on the KiTS19, LiTS17, pancreas and LOTUS datasets, surpassing 3D segmentation models, while remaining computationally efficient with fewer parameters.

Extraosseous Ewing Sarcoma Manifesting as an Acute Abdomen in a Young Adult Male: a Case Report.

Ewing sarcoma is a tumor primarily affecting children and young adults, and usually affects long bones. Extraosseous Ewing sarcoma (EES) is a rare primary tumor of soft tissues. We present a case of abdominal EES with metastasis to thoracic cavity, which presented as abdominal pain and vomiting in a 21-year-old previously healthy gentleman.

Trace of delirium after robotic lower abdominal tumor resection at different end-tidal carbon dioxide: a RCT trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium (POD) often occurs in oncology patients, further increasing the medical and financial burden. Robotic technology in lower abdominal tumors resection reduces surgical trauma but increases risks such as carbon dioxide (CO2) absorption. This study aimed to investigate the differences in their occurrence of POD at different end-tidal CO2 levels. METHOD: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Affiliated Hospital of He Bei University (HDFY-LL-2022-169). The study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry on URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn , Registry Number: ChiCTR2200056019 (Registry Date: 27/08/2022). In patients scheduled robotic lower abdominal tumor resection from September 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022, a comprehensive delirium assessment was performed three days postoperatively using the CAM scale with clinical review records. Intraoperative administration of different etCO2 was performed depending on the randomized grouping after intubation. Group L received lower level etCO2 management (31-40mmHg), and Group H maintained the higher level(41-50mmHg) during pneumoperitoneum. Data were analyzed using Pearson Chi-Square or Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests and multiple logistic regression. Preoperative mental status score, alcohol impairment score, nicotine dependence score, history of hypertension and diabetes, duration of surgery and worst pain score were included in the regression model along with basic patient information for covariate correction analysis. RESULTS: Among the 103 enrolled patients, 19 (18.4%) developed postoperative delirium. The incidence of delirium in different etCO2 groups was 21.6% in Group L and 15.4% in Group H, respectively, with no statistical differences. In adjusted multivariate analysis, age and during of surgery were statistically significant predictors of postoperative delirium. The breath-hold test was significantly lower postoperatively, but no statistical differences were found between two groups. CONCLUSION: With robotic assistant, the incidence of postoperative delirium in patients undergoing lower abdominal tumor resection was not modified by different end-tidal carbon dioxide management, however, age and duration of surgery were positively associated risk factors.

Impact of pre-treatment extracellular volume fraction measured by computed tomography on response of primary lesion to preoperative chemotherapy in abdominal neuroblastoma.

OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively investigate the impact of pre-treatment Extracellular Volume Fraction (ECV) measured by Computed Tomography (CT) on the response of primary lesions to preoperative chemotherapy in abdominal neuroblastoma. METHODS: A total of seventy-five patients with abdominal neuroblastoma were retrospectively included in the study. The regions of interest for the primary lesion and aorta were determined on unenhanced and equilibrium phase CT images before treatment, and their average CT values were measured. Based on patient hematocrit and average CT values, the ECV was calculated. The correlation between ECV and the reduction in primary lesion volume was examined. A receiver operating characteristic curve was generated to assess the predictive performance of ECV for a very good partial response of the primary lesion. RESULTS: There was a negative correlation between primary lesion volume reduction and ECV (r = -0.351, p = 0.002), and primary lesions with very good partial response had lower ECV (p < 0.001). The area under the curve for ECV in predicting the very good partial response of primary lesion was 0.742 (p < 0.001), with a 95 % Confidence Interval of 0.628 to 0.836. The optimal cut-off value was 0.28, and the sensitivity and specificity were 62.07 % and 84.78 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of pre-treatment ECV on CT images demonstrates a significant correlation with the response of the primary lesion to preoperative chemotherapy in abdominal neuroblastoma.

Postoperative pain management following minimally invasive abdominal cancer surgeries -An audit.

BACKGROUND: There is limited data comparing pain management following various minimally invasive oncological surgeries (MIOS). This retrospective audit was planned to determine the severity of pain and to study the analgesic modalities offered to these patients. Secondary objectives included studying opioid requirements, non-opioid analgesics, their side effects, and the influence of comorbidities on the choice of pain modalities. METHODS: Following approval and registration of trial (CTRI/2018/10/016220), data were collected retrospectively from adult patients who underwent elective MIOS for abdominal tumors from August 2017 to July 2018. Pain scores (PS) on the day of surgery, and the average, worst PS, and the morphine equivalent (ME) dose in the perioperative period was recorded. Emergency surgeries and thoracic-abdominal MIOS were excluded. The association between the type of surgery, pain modalities, and PS were compared using Chi-square test. ME dose consumption of patients and type of surgery were compared using ANOVA with Bonferroni's correction. RESULTS: Out of the 349 patients' data that were analyzed, 76% had mild, 22% had moderate, and 2% had severe pain after surgery. Port site infiltration was done in 27% of cases and epidural analgesia in 46 patients (13%). PS and opioid consumption (ME = 5.7 ± 5.2 mg) was significantly higher following pelvic surgeries when compared to other urological and diagnostic MIOS. American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status did not affect PS or choice of pain management technique. CONCLUSION: Most of the patients experience mild pain at movement in the immediate postoperative period, pelvic MIOS (abdominoperineal resection/exenteration surgeries) have higher PS and opioid consumption than other MIOS.

Impact of an online reference system on the diagnosis of rare or atypical abdominal tumors and lesions.

The purpose of the present study is to evaluate whether an online reference system (ORS, STATdx Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands) impacts finding the histologically confirmed diagnosis of rare or atypical abdominal tumors and lesions in radiologic imaging. In total, 101 patients with rare tumor entities or lesions and atypical manifestations of common tumors were enrolled retrospectively. Blinded readings were performed by four radiologists with varying levels of experience, who reported on: (a) correct diagnosis (CD), (b) time needed to find the diagnosis, and (c) diagnostic confidence, initially without followed by the assistance of the ORS. The experienced reader (3 years of experience post-residency, CD 49.5%), as well as the advanced reader with 1 year of experience post-residency (CD 43.6%), and a resident with 5 years of experience (CD 46.5%) made the correct diagnosis more frequently compared to the less experienced reader (CD 25.7%). A significant improvement in making the correct diagnosis was only achieved by the advanced reader, the resident with 5 years of experience (CD with ORS 58.4%; p < 0.001). The advanced reader with 1 year of experience post-residency improved slightly (CD ORS 47.5%). The experienced reader (CD ORS 50.5%) and the less experienced reader (CD ORS 27.7%) did not improve significantly. The overall subjective confidence increased significantly when ORS was used (3.2 ± 0.9 vs. 3.8 ± 0.9; p < 0.001). While the ORS had a positive impact on making the correct diagnosis throughout all readers, it favored radiologists with more clinical experience rather than inexperienced residents. Moreover, the ORS increased the diagnostic confidence of all radiologists significantly. In conclusion, the ORS had no significant impact on the diagnosis of rare or atypical abdominal tumors and lesions except for one reader. The greatest benefit is the increase in diagnostic confidence.

Desmoid tumors of rectus abdominis: A case report and literature review.

RATIONALE: Desmoid tumor (DT) is a rare soft tissue tumor that can occur anywhere in the body. Abdominal wall DT presents unique clinical challenges due to its distinctive manifestations, treatment modalities, and the lack of biomarkers for diagnosis and recurrence prediction, making clinical decisions exceedingly complex. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 32-year-old female who underwent radical resection combined with patch reinforcement for rectus abdominis DT, successfully alleviating abdominal discomfort, with no recurrence during the 6-month follow-up after surgery. DIAGNOSES: Based on the imaging studies and medical history, the patient underwent radical surgical resection. Histopathology reveals that the tumor cells predominantly composed of proliferative fibroblasts with local collagen deposition. The lesional cells show positive staining for ß-catenin, indicating a diagnosis of DT. INTERVENTIONS: The patient underwent radical surgical resection with patch reinforcement to repair the abdominal wall defect. Pathology confirmed negative margins, achieving an R0 resection, and genetic testing identified a T41A mutation in CTNNB1. Consequently, no additional adjuvant therapy was administered postoperatively. OUTCOMES: The patient was discharged with the incision healing well after 3 days postoperation. Upon reexamination 6 months later, no recurrence or adverse complications were observed. LESSONS: Abdominal wall DT treatment requires personalized plans from multidisciplinary team discussions. Genetic testing plays a crucial role in identifying novel biomarkers for abdominal wall DT. We have once again demonstrated the significant clinical significance of CTNNB1 mutations in the diagnosis and progression of abdominal wall DT. Additionally, genes such as CCND1, CYP3A4, SLIT1, RRM1, STIM1, ESR2, UGT1A1, among others, may also be closely associated with the progression of abdominal wall DT. Future research should delve deeper into and systematically evaluate the precise impact of these genetic mutations on treatment selection and prognosis for abdominal wall DT, in order to better guide patient management and treatment decisions.

A non-inferiority study of MRI versus CT for staging and image-defined risk factor assessment in the preoperative work-up of abdominopelvic neuroblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Neuroblastoma accounts for 15 % of cancer deaths in children. Complete surgical resection is associated with a higher overall survival rate but also a higher morbidity rate. An international group of experts has defined a nomenclature of image-defined risk factors (IDRFs) for the determination of operability and the anticipation of reasonably foreseeable complications of surgery. However, there is no consensus on the optimal imaging modality (CT or MRI) for the assessment of IDRFs. The objective of the present study was to determine the non-inferiority of MRI vs. CT in the preoperative assessment of abdominopelvic neuroblastoma. The secondary objective was to assess the contribution of gadolinium contrast enhancement. METHODS: All children diagnosed with abdominopelvic neuroblastoma and whose preoperative work-up included a contrast-enhanced CT or MRI scan of the abdomen and pelvis between January 2014 and January 2023 were included. To evaluate the IDRFs, all the images were reviewed in three steps: (i) non-contrast MRI scans, (ii) both non-contrast and contrast-enhanced MRI scans, and (iii) contrast-enhanced CT scans. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were found to be eligible, and fifteen were included. The mean time interval between MRI and preoperative CT was 23 days. In all patients, the identified IDRFs were similar for all three imaging modalities. Fourteen patients underwent full resection of the tumour. The surgical reports were fully consistent with the IDRFs described on CT and/or MRI. CONCLUSION: A high-resolution three-dimensional T2 MRI sequence agreed fully with contrast-enhanced CT for the detection of IDRFs. Contrast-enhanced MRI did not add value. However, surgeons will need time to adapt to this MRI-based approach and learn how to interpret the results with confidence.

Sympathetic nerve blocks for persistent pain in adults with inoperable abdominopelvic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Persistent visceral pain is an unpleasant sensation coming from one or more organs within the body. Visceral pain is a common symptom in those with advanced cancer. Interventional procedures, such as neurolytic sympathetic nerve blocks, have been suggested as additional treatments that may play a part in optimising pain management for individuals with this condition. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and harms of neurolytic sympathetic nerve blocks for persistent visceral pain in adults with inoperable abdominopelvic cancer compared to standard care or placebo and comparing single blocks to combination blocks. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following databases without language restrictions on 19 October 2022 and ran a top-up search on 31 October 2023: CENTRAL; MEDLINE via Ovid; Embase via Ovid; LILACS. We searched trial registers without language restrictions on 2 November 2022: ClinicalTrials.gov; WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We searched grey literature, checked reference lists of reviews and retrieved articles for additional studies, and performed citation searches on key articles. We also contacted experts in the field for unpublished and ongoing trials. Our trial protocol was preregistered in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews on 21 October 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA: We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any sympathetic nerve block targeting sites commonly used to treat abdominal pelvic pain from inoperable malignancies in adults to standard care or placebo. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We independently selected trials based on predefined inclusion criteria, resolving any differences via adjudication with a third review author. We used a random-effects model as some heterogeneity was expected between the studies due to differences in the interventions being assessed and malignancy types included in the study population. We chose three primary outcomes and four secondary outcomes of interest. We sought consumer input to refine our review outcomes and assessed extracted data using Cochrane's risk of bias 2 tool (RoB 2). We assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE system. MAIN RESULTS: We included 17 studies with 1025 participants in this review. Fifteen studies with a total of 951 participants contributed to the quantitative analysis. Single block versus standard care Primary outcomes No included studies reported our primary outcome, 'Proportion of participants reporting no worse than mild pain after treatment at 14 days'. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of sympathetic nerve blocks on reducing pain to no worse than mild pain at 14 days when compared to standard care due to insufficient data (very low-certainty evidence). Sympathetic nerve blocks may provide small to 'little to no' improvement in quality of life (QOL) scores at 14 days after treatment when compared to standard care, but the evidence is very uncertain (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.70 to 0.25; I² = 87%; 4 studies, 150 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the risk of serious adverse events as defined in our review as only one study contributed data to this outcome. Sympathetic nerve blocks may have an 'increased risk' to 'no additional risk' of harm compared with standard care (very low-certainty evidence). Secondary outcomes Sympathetic nerve blocks showed a small to 'little to no' effect on participant-reported pain scores at 14 days using a 0 to 10 visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain compared with standard care, but the evidence is very uncertain (mean difference (MD) -0.44, 95% CI -0.98 to 0.11; I² = 56%; 5 studies, 214 participants; very low-certainty evidence). There may be a 'moderate to large' to 'little to no' reduction in daily consumption of opioids postprocedure at 14 days with sympathetic nerve blocks compared with standard care, but the evidence is very uncertain (change in daily consumption of opioids at 14 days as oral milligrams morphine equivalent (MME): MD -41.63 mg, 95% CI -78.54 mg to -4.72 mg; I² = 90%; 4 studies, 130 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of sympathetic nerve blocks on participant satisfaction with procedure at 0 to 7 days and time to need for retreatment or treatment effect failure (or both) due to insufficient data. Combination block versus single block Primary outcomes There is no evidence about the effect of combination sympathetic nerve blocks compared with single sympathetic nerve blocks on the proportion of participants reporting no worse than mild pain after treatment at 14 days because no studies reported this outcome. There may be a small to 'little to no' effect on QOL score at 14 days after treatment, but the evidence is very uncertain (very low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the risk of serious adverse events with combination sympathetic nerve blocks compared with single sympathetic nerve blocks due to limited reporting in the included studies (very low-certainty evidence). Secondary outcomes The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of combination sympathetic nerve blocks compared with single sympathetic nerve blocks on participant-reported pain score and change in daily consumption of opioids postprocedure, at 14 days. There may be a small to 'little to no' effect, but the evidence is very uncertain (very low-certainty evidence). There is no evidence about the effect on participant satisfaction with procedure at 0 to 7 days and time to need for retreatment or treatment effect failure (or both) due to these outcomes not being measured by the studies. Risk of bias The risk of bias was predominately high for most outcomes in most studies due to significant concerns regarding adequate blinding. Very few studies were deemed as low risk across all domains for any outcome. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence to support or refute the use of sympathetic nerve blocks for persistent abdominopelvic pain due to inoperable malignancy. We are very uncertain about the effect of combination sympathetic nerve blocks compared with single sympathetic nerve blocks. The certainty of the evidence is very low and these findings should be interpreted with caution.

Intrafraction organ movement in adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy of abdominal lesions - dosimetric impact and how to detect its extent in advance.

INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) allows daily adaptation of treatment plans to compensate for positional changes of target volumes and organs at risk (OARs). However, current adaptation times are relatively long and organ movement occurring during the adaptation process might offset the benefit gained by adaptation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the dosimetric impact of these intrafractional changes. Additionally, a method to predict the extent of organ movement before the first treatment was evaluated in order to have the possibility to compensate for them, for example by adding additional margins to OARs. MATERIALS & METHODS: Twenty patients receiving adaptive MRgRT for treatment of abdominal lesions were retrospectively analyzed. Magnetic resonance (MR) images acquired at the start of adaptation and immediately before irradiation were used to calculate adapted and pre-irradiation dose in OARs directly next to the planning target volume. The extent of organ movement was determined on MR images acquired during simulation sessions and adaptive treatments, and their agreement was evaluated. Correlation between the magnitude of organ movement during simulation and the duration of simulation session was analyzed in order to assess whether organ movement might be relevant even if the adaptation process could be accelerated in the future. RESULTS: A significant increase in dose constraint violations was observed from adapted (6.9%) to pre-irradiation (30.2%) dose distributions. Overall, OAR dose increased significantly by 4.3% due to intrafractional organ movement. Median changes in organ position of 7.5 mm (range 1.5-10.5 mm) were detected within a median time of 17.1 min (range 1.6-28.7 min). Good agreement was found between the range of organ movement during simulation and adaptation (66.8%), especially if simulation sessions were longer and multiple MR images were acquired. No correlation was determined between duration of simulation sessions and magnitude of organ movement. CONCLUSION: Intrafractional organ movement can impact dose distributions and lead to violations of OAR tolerance doses, which impairs the benefit of daily on-table plan adaptation. By application of simulation images, the extent of intrafractional organ movement can be predicted, which possibly allows to compensate for them.

Entinostat in patients with relapsed or refractory abdominal neuroendocrine tumors.

BACKGROUND: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are rare neoplasms with an increasing annual incidence and prevalence. Many are metastatic at presentation or recur following surgical resection and require systemic therapy, for which somatostatin analogs such as octreotide or lanreotide comprise typical first-line therapies. Nonetheless, treatment options remain limited. Epigenetic processes such as histone modifications have been implicated in malignant transformation and progression. In this study, we evaluated the anti-proliferative effects of a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, entinostat, which was computationally predicted to show anti-cancer activity, as confirmed in in vitro and in vivo models of GEP-NETs. METHODS: This was a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of entinostat in patients with relapsed or refractory abdominal NETs. The primary objective was to estimate the objective response rate to entinostat. Additionally, with each patient as his/her own control we estimated the rates of tumor growth prior to enrollment on study and while receiving entinostat. Patients received 5 mg entinostat weekly until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The dose could be changed to 10 mg biweekly for patients who did not experience grade ≥ 2 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) in cycle 1, but was primarily administered at the starting 5 mg weekly dose. RESULTS: The study enrolled only 5 patients due to early termination by the drug sponsor. The first patient that enrolled had advanced disease and died within days of enrollment before follow-up imaging due to a grade 5 AE unrelated to study treatment and was considered non-evaluable. Best RECIST response for the remaining 4 patients was stable disease (SD) with time on study of 154+, 243, 574, and 741 days. With each patient as his/her own control, rates of tumor growth on entinostat were markedly reduced with rates 17%, 20%, 33%, and 68% of the rates prior to enrollment on study. Toxicities possibly or definitely related to entinostat included grade 2/3 neutrophil count decrease [2/4 (50%)/ 2/4 (50%)], grade 3 hypophosphatemia [1/4, (25%)], grade 1/2 fatigue [1/4 (25%)/ 2/4 (50%)], and other self-limiting grade 1/2 AEs. CONCLUSION: In the treatment of relapsed or refractory abdominal NETs, entinostat 5 mg weekly led to prolonged SD and reduced the rate of tumor growth by 32% to 83% with an acceptable safety profile (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03211988).