Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 16 de 16
Filter
1.
Pain Manag ; 11(1): 75-87, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33234017

ABSTRACT

Neck pain is a common condition with a high prevalence worldwide. Neck pain is associated with significant levels of disability and is widely considered an important public health problem. Neck pain is defined as pain perceived between the superior nuchal line and the spinous process of the first thoracic vertebra. In some types of neck conditions, the pain can be referred to the head, trunk and upper limbs. This article aims to provide an overview of the available evidence on prevalence, costs, diagnosis, prognosis, risk factors, prevention and management of patients with neck pain.


Subject(s)
Acute Pain , Chronic Pain , Neck Pain , Pain Management , Acute Pain/diagnosis , Acute Pain/economics , Acute Pain/epidemiology , Acute Pain/therapy , Adult , Chronic Pain/diagnosis , Chronic Pain/economics , Chronic Pain/epidemiology , Chronic Pain/therapy , Humans , Neck Pain/diagnosis , Neck Pain/economics , Neck Pain/epidemiology , Neck Pain/therapy , Pain Management/economics , Pain Management/methods
2.
J Thorac Imaging ; 35(3): 198-203, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32032251

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utilization of invasive and noninvasive tests and compare cost in patients presenting with chest pain to the emergency department (ED) who underwent either triple-rule-out computed tomography angiography (TRO-CTA) or standard of care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective single-center analysis of 2156 ED patients who presented with acute chest pain with a negative initial troponin and electrocardiogram for myocardial injury. Patient cohorts matched by patient characteristics who had undergone TRO-CTA as a primary imaging test (n=1139) or standard of care without initial CTA imaging (n=1017) were included in the study. ED visits, utilization of tests, and costs during the initial episode of hospital care were compared. RESULTS: No significant differences in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease, pulmonary embolism, or aortic dissection were observed. Median ED waiting time (4.5 vs. 7.0 h, P<0.001), median total length of hospital stay (5.0 vs. 32.0 h, P<0.001), hospital admission rate (12.6% vs. 54.2%, P<0.001), and ED return rate to our hospital within 30 days (3.5% vs. 14.6%, P<0.001) were significantly lower in the TRO-CTA group. Moreover, reduced rates of additional testing and invasive coronary angiography (4.9% vs. 22.7%, P<0.001), and ultimately lower total cost per patient (11,783$ vs. 19,073$, P<0.001) were observed in the TRO-CTA group. CONCLUSIONS: TRO-CTA as an initial imaging test in ED patients presenting with acute chest pain was associated with shorter ED and hospital length of stay, fewer return visits within 30 days, and ultimately lower ED and hospitalization costs.


Subject(s)
Chest Pain/economics , Computed Tomography Angiography/economics , Coronary Angiography/economics , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Costs and Cost Analysis/methods , Standard of Care/economics , Acute Pain/cerebrospinal fluid , Acute Pain/diagnostic imaging , Acute Pain/economics , Acute Pain/etiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chest Pain/diagnostic imaging , Chest Pain/etiology , Computed Tomography Angiography/statistics & numerical data , Coronary Angiography/statistics & numerical data , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/economics , Costs and Cost Analysis/economics , Costs and Cost Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Standard of Care/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
3.
Trials ; 19(1): 501, 2018 Sep 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30223903

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Whilst current guidelines highlight the importance of pain management for children with acute otitis media (AOM), there is evidence to suggest that this is not implemented in everyday practice. We have developed a primary care-based multifaceted educational intervention to optimise pain management in children with AOM, and we trial its clinical and cost effectiveness. METHODS: This cluster randomised controlled trial aims to recruit 250 children aged 6 months to 10 years presenting with AOM to general practitioners (GPs) in 30 primary care centres (PCCs) across the Netherlands. GPs in the PCCs allocated to the intervention group receive a blended GP educational programme (online and face-to-face training). The intervention asks GPs to proactively discuss pain management with parents using an information leaflet, and to prescribe paracetamol and ibuprofen according to current guidelines. GPs in both groups complete an online module illustrating various otoscopic images to standardise AOM diagnosis. GPs in the PCCs allocated to the control group do not receive any further training and provide 'care as usual'. During the 4-week follow-up, parents complete a symptom diary. The primary outcome is the difference in parent-reported mean earache scores over the first 3 days. Secondary outcomes include both number of days with earache and fever, GP re-consultations for AOM, antibiotic prescriptions, and costs. Analysis will be by intention-to-treat. DISCUSSION: The optimal use of analgesics through the multifaceted intervention may provide symptom relief and thereby reduce re-consultations and antibiotic prescriptions in children with AOM. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register, NTR4920 . Registered on 19 December 2014.


Subject(s)
Acute Pain/therapy , Earache/therapy , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Otitis Media/therapy , Pain Management/methods , Parents/education , Primary Health Care/methods , Acetaminophen/therapeutic use , Acute Pain/diagnosis , Acute Pain/economics , Acute Pain/etiology , Age Factors , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Earache/diagnosis , Earache/economics , Earache/etiology , Female , Health Care Costs , Humans , Ibuprofen/therapeutic use , Infant , Male , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Netherlands , Otitis Media/complications , Otitis Media/diagnosis , Otitis Media/economics , Pain Management/economics , Pain Measurement , Pamphlets , Parents/psychology , Primary Health Care/economics , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
5.
Eur Spine J ; 27(1): 109-116, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27652679

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To report health care costs and the factors associated with such costs in people with acute low back pain receiving guideline-recommended first line care. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a trial which found no difference in clinical outcomes. Participants with acute low back pain received reassurance and advice, and either paracetamol (taken regularly or as needed) or placebo for up to 4 weeks and followed up for 12 weeks. Data on health service utilisation were collected by self-report. A health sector perspective was adopted to report all direct costs incurred (in 2015 AUD, 1 AUD = 0.53 Euro). Costs were reported for the entire study cohort and for each group. Various baseline clinical, demographic, work-related and socioeconomic factors were investigated for their association with increased costs using generalised linear models. RESULTS: The mean cost per participant was AUD167.74 (SD = 427.24) for the entire cohort (n = 1365). Most of these costs were incurred in primary care through visits to a general practitioner or physiotherapist. Compared to the placebo group, there was an increase in cost when paracetamol was taken. Multivariate analysis showed that disability, symptom duration and compensation were associated with costs. Receiving compensation was associated with a twofold increase compared to not receiving compensation. CONCLUSIONS: Taking paracetamol as part of first line care for acute low back pain increased the economic burden. Higher disability, longer symptom duration and receiving compensation were independently associated with increased health care costs.


Subject(s)
Acetaminophen/economics , Acute Pain/economics , Cost of Illness , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Low Back Pain/economics , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Acetaminophen/therapeutic use , Acute Pain/drug therapy , Adult , Australia , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Humans , Low Back Pain/drug therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Primary Health Care , Socioeconomic Factors
6.
Scand J Pain ; 17: 345-349, 2017 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28993112

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hospitalization as a result of acute exacerbation of complex chronic pain is a largely hidden problem, as patients are often admitted to hospital under a variety of specialities, and there is frequently no overarching inpatient chronic pain service dedicated to their management. Our institution had established an inpatient acute pain service overseen by pain physicians and staffed by specialist nurses that was intended to focus on the management of perioperative pain. We soon observed an increasing number of nurse-to-nurse referrals of non-surgical inpatients admitted with chronic pain. Some of these patients had seemingly intractable and highly complex pain problems, and consequently we initiated twice-weekly attending physician-led inpatient pain rounds to coordinate their management. From these referrals, we identified a cohort of 20 patients who were frequently hospitalized for long periods with exacerbations of chronic pain. We sought to establish whether the introduction of the physician-led inpatient pain ward round reduced the number and duration of hospitalizations, and costs of treatment. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective, observational, intervention cohort study. We recorded acute Emergency Department (ED) attendances, hospital admissions, and duration and costs of hospitalization of the cohort of 20 patients in the year before and year after introduction of the inpatient pain service. RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 38.2 years (±standard deviation 13.8 years, range 18-68 years); 13 were women (65.0%). The mode number of ED attendances was 4 (range 2-15) pre-intervention, and 3 (range 0-9) afterwards (p=0.116). The mode bed occupancy was 32 days (range 9-170 days) pre-intervention and 19 days (range 0-115 days) afterwards (p=0.215). The total cost of treating the cohort over the 2-year study period was £733,010 (US$1.12m), comprising £429,479 (US$656,291) of bed costs and £303,531 (US$463,828) of investigation costs. The intervention did not achieve significant improvements in the total costs, bed costs or investigation costs. CONCLUSIONS: Despite our attending physician-led intervention, the frequency, duration and very substantial costs of hospitalization of the cohort were not significantly reduced, suggesting that other strategies need to be identified to help these complex and vulnerable patients. IMPLICATIONS: Frequent hospitalization with acute exacerbation of chronic pain is a largely hidden problem that has very substantial implications for patients, their carers and healthcare providers. Chronic pain services tend to focus on outpatient management. Breaking the cycle of frequent and recurrent hospitalization using multidisciplinary chronic pain management techniques has the potential to improve patients' quality of life and reduce hospital costs. Nonetheless, the complexity of these patients' chronic pain problems should not be underestimated and in some cases are very challenging to treat.


Subject(s)
Acute Pain/therapy , Chronic Pain/therapy , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Pain Clinics/statistics & numerical data , Acute Pain/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Chronic Pain/economics , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/economics , Pain Clinics/economics , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
7.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care ; 34(2): 142-147, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26764345

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness, adverse effects, and cost-effectiveness of percutaneous neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB) versus traditional medication strategies for the treatment of patients with advanced cancer having severe upper abdominal cancer pain. METHODS: This retrospective study included 81 patients with advanced upper abdominal cancer admitted to The Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University between January 2013 and July 2014. The patients were divided into percutaneous NCPB (treatment) and medication for pain (control) groups. The outcomes were measured in terms of Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score before treatment and on the 3rd, 7th, 14th, and 28th days posttreatment. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the therapy were assessed using analysis of the health economics. RESULTS: The improvements in NRS score (1.42 ± 1.09 vs 4.03 ± 0.96, P < .01) and KPS score (65.55 ± 9.09 vs 63.03 ± 8.961, P < .01) in the treatment group were significantly superior compared to the control group on the 7th day of treatment, followed by no significant difference between the 2 groups on the 14th and the 28th day of treatment. Health economics evaluation revealed that the medicine-specific costs and total health care costs were significantly reduced in the treatment group compared to the control group ( P < .05), but no significant differences between the 2 groups ( P > .05) were seen in the costs of hospitalization, examinations, and treatment. CONCLUSION: The percutaneous NCPB method shows promising results and better cost-effectiveness for treating patients with advanced cancer having severe upper abdominal pain.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Pain/surgery , Cancer Pain/surgery , Catheter Ablation , Celiac Plexus , Pain Management/methods , Abdominal Pain/economics , Acute Pain/economics , Acute Pain/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cancer Pain/economics , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Catheter Ablation/economics , Catheter Ablation/methods , Celiac Plexus/surgery , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Management/adverse effects , Pain Management/economics , Pain Measurement , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
8.
Urology ; 94: 36-41, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27210570

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinic characteristics, diagnosis, management, and costs of the adult acute scrotum in the emergency room (ER). Acute scrotum is a syndrome characterized by intense, acute scrotal pain that may be accompanied by other symptoms. It is usual in children and commonly found as well in adults, with different causal pathologies between these groups. METHODS: Between November 2013 and September 2014, 669 cases of adult acute scrotum who presented to our ER were prospectively analyzed. Patients under 15 years of age were excluded. Patient age, reason for consultation, investigations performed, final diagnosis, management, and costs were evaluated. For the statistical analysis, the Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis U, and chi-square tests were used. RESULTS: A total of 669 cases of acute scrotum were analyzed. The mean age at presentation was 40.2 ± 17.3 years. The most presented diagnoses were orchiepididymitis (28.7%), epididymitis (28.4%), symptoms of uncertain etiology (25.1%), and orchitis (10.3%). Diagnostic tests were carried out in 57.8% of cases. Most cases were treated as outpatients (94.2%), with 5.83% admitted and 1% undergoing surgical treatment. Overall, 13.3% of patients represented to the ER. Abnormal results in blood and urine tests were more common among older patients and infectious pathologies. The average cost generated by an acute scrotum ER consult was 195.03€. CONCLUSION: Infectious pathologies are the most common causes of acute scrotum at ER. Abnormal blood and urine tests are unusual and are more common in older patients and infectious pathologies.


Subject(s)
Acute Pain , Scrotum , Acute Pain/diagnosis , Acute Pain/economics , Acute Pain/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Emergencies , Emergency Service, Hospital , Health Care Costs , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Young Adult
9.
Anesthesiol Clin ; 33(4): 739-51, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26610627

ABSTRACT

Effective and efficient acute pain management strategies have the potential to improve medical outcomes, enhance patient satisfaction, and reduce costs. Pain management records are having an increasing influence on patient choice of health care providers and will affect future financial reimbursement. Dedicated acute pain and regional anesthesia services are invaluable in improving acute pain management. In addition, nonpharmacologic and alternative therapies, as well as information technology, should be viewed as complimentary to traditional pharmacologic treatments commonly used in the management of acute pain. The use of innovative technologies to improve acute pain management may be worthwhile for health care institutions.


Subject(s)
Acute Pain/therapy , Anesthesia, Conduction/methods , Pain Management/methods , Acute Pain/economics , Anesthesia, Conduction/economics , Humans , Pain Management/economics , Patient Satisfaction/economics , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data
10.
Schmerz ; 29(3): 266-75, 2015 Jul.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25994606

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Due to the implementation of the diagnosis-related groups (DRG) system, the competitive pressure on German hospitals increased. In this context it has been shown that acute pain management offers economic benefits for hospitals. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of the competitive situation, the ownership and the economic resources required on structures and processes for acute pain management. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A standardized questionnaire on structures and processes of acute pain management was mailed to the 885 directors of German departments of anesthesiology listed as members of the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin). RESULTS: For most hospitals a strong regional competition existed; however, this parameter affected neither the implementation of structures nor the recommended treatment processes for pain therapy. In contrast, a clear preference for hospitals in private ownership to use the benchmarking tool QUIPS (quality improvement in postoperative pain therapy) was found. These hospitals also presented information on coping with the management of pain in the corporate clinic mission statement more often and published information about the quality of acute pain management in the quality reports more frequently. No differences were found between hospitals with different forms of ownership in the implementation of acute pain services, quality circles, expert standard pain management and the implementation of recommended processes. Hospitals with a higher case mix index (CMI) had a certified acute pain management more often. The corporate mission statement of these hospitals also contained information on how to cope with pain, presentation of the quality of pain management in the quality report, implementation of quality circles and the implementation of the expert standard pain management more frequently. There were no differences in the frequency of using the benchmarking tool QUIPS or the implementation of recommended treatment processes with respect to the CMI. CONCLUSION: In this survey no effect of the competitive situation of hospitals on acute pain management could be demonstrated. Private ownership and a higher CMI were more often associated with structures of acute pain management which were publicly accessible in terms of hospital marketing.


Subject(s)
Acute Pain/economics , Acute Pain/therapy , Economic Competition/economics , Economics, Hospital , Ownership/economics , Pain Management/economics , Anesthesiology/economics , Critical Care/economics , Germany , Humans , Insurance Carriers/economics , Management Quality Circles/economics , Marketing of Health Services/economics , National Health Programs/economics , Quality Improvement/economics , Reimbursement Mechanisms/economics , Risk Adjustment/economics
12.
Reumatismo ; 66(1): 103-7, 2014 Jun 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24938203

ABSTRACT

Chronic pain has been identified as an important issue related to various rheumatic diseases. At the time of a major government spending review, it is appropriate to discuss the pain characterising rheumatic diseases and its related costs. It is clearly essential for healthcare authorities to rationalise their policies on the basis of the increasing expectations of the users of healthcare services while simultaneously balancing their books. There are few published studies concerning the costs of pain of any kind, and the same is true of the costs of the chronic pain associated with diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, and fibromyalgia.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain/economics , Cost of Illness , Musculoskeletal Pain/economics , Rheumatic Diseases/economics , Acute Pain/economics , Acute Pain/etiology , Analgesics/economics , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/economics , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/complications , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/economics , Chronic Pain/etiology , Drug Costs , Europe , Fibromyalgia/complications , Fibromyalgia/economics , Health Expenditures , Health Policy , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Musculoskeletal Pain/etiology , Osteoarthritis/complications , Osteoarthritis/economics , Prescription Fees , Quality of Life , Rheumatic Diseases/complications , Rheumatic Diseases/epidemiology , United States
14.
Pharmacotherapy ; 32(9 Suppl): 6S-11S, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22956493

ABSTRACT

The majority of patients who undergo surgery will require drug therapy for the management of acute postsurgical pain. Effective control of acute postsurgical pain is essential for the patient not only in the short term but also in the long term to prevent the development of chronic pain, which can occur if early acute pain is prolonged. Currently, opioid analgesics are widely used for the management of acute postsurgical pain. Although opioids provide effective postsurgical pain relief, their use is associated with a number of risks, including the development of opioid-related adverse drug events (ORADEs). This review investigates the prevalence of opioid use in the postsurgical setting, the incidence of ORADEs, and the impact of these ORADEs on patient outcomes, length of stay, and costs after common surgeries. According to a national analysis of ORADE incidence, almost 20% of patients treated with opioids experienced an ORADE, with the most common being gastrointestinal effects, central nervous system effects, pruritus, or urinary retention. Studies show that the risk of developing an ORADE is higher in patients receiving higher doses of opioids and in patients undergoing orthopedic or gynecologic surgery compared with patients undergoing general surgery. Elderly patients and those with comorbidities (e.g., obesity, sleep apnea, respiratory disease, urinary disorders) may be particularly vulnerable to ORADE development. Both hospital costs and length of stay are increased in patients with an ORADE versus those without an ORADE. Strategies to reduce the use of opioids after surgery are likely to result in positive outcomes by reducing the incidence of ORADEs and, as a result, reducing treatment costs associated with surgery and improving patient care.


Subject(s)
Acute Pain/drug therapy , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Acute Pain/economics , Acute Pain/etiology , Aged , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Analgesics, Opioid/economics , Hospital Costs , Humans , Incidence , Length of Stay , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pain, Postoperative/economics , Patient Care , Prevalence
15.
J Occup Environ Med ; 54(2): 216-23, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22267188

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Quantify temporal changes in opioid use. METHODS: Claim and prescription data for Louisiana Workers' Compensation Corporation claims open from 1999 and 2009 were analyzed by claim age and type of opioid. RESULTS: There was a significant cumulative yearly increase in morphine milligram equivalents prescribed for claimants with acute pain (55-mg increase per year), as well as chronic pain (461-mg increase per year). The cost per morphine milligram equivalent was approximately the same ($0.06 to $0.07) for long- and short-acting medications, but the medication cost was 8 times higher in claims where long-acting opioids were prescribed (with or without short-acting opioids) versus only short-acting medications. CONCLUSIONS: The annual cumulative dose and cost of opioids per claim increased over the study period related to an increase in prescriptions for long-acting opioids.


Subject(s)
Acute Pain/drug therapy , Analgesics, Opioid/economics , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Drug Costs , Drug Utilization/trends , Occupational Injuries/drug therapy , Acute Pain/economics , Adult , Chronic Pain/economics , Female , Humans , Louisiana , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Injuries/economics , Workers' Compensation/economics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL