Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Crit Care Med ; 48(12): e1164-e1170, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33003081

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Deliver a novel interdisciplinary care process for ICU survivor care and their primary family caregivers, and assess mortality, readmission rates, and economic impact compared with usual care. DESIGN: Population health quality improvement comparative study with retrospective data analysis. SETTING: A single tertiary care rural hospital with medical/surgical, neuroscience, trauma, and cardiac ICUs. PATIENTS: ICU survivors. INTERVENTIONS: Reorganization of existing post discharge health care delivery resources to form an ICU survivor clinic care process and compare this new process to post discharge usual care process. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Demographic data, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV scores, and Charlson Comorbidity Index scores were extracted from the electronic health record. Additional data was extracted from the care manager database. Economic data were extracted from the Geisinger Health Plan database and analyzed by a health economist. During 13-month period analyzed, patients in the ICU survivor care had reduced mortality compared with usual care, as determined by the Kaplan-Meier method (ICU survivor care 0.89 vs usual care 0.71; log-rank p = 0.0108) and risk-adjusted stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (hazard ratio, 0.157; 95% CI, 0.058-0.427). Readmission for ICU survivor care versus usual care: at 30 days (10.4% vs 26.3%; stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting hazard ratio, 0.539; 95% CI, 0.224-1.297) and at 60 days (16.7% vs 34.7%; stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting hazard ratio, 0.525; 95% CI, 0.240-1.145). Financial data analysis indicates estimated annual cost savings to Geisinger Health Plan ranges from $247,052 to $424,846 during the time period analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: Our ICU survivor care process results in decreased mortality and a net annual cost savings to the insurer compared with usual care processes. There was no statistically significant difference in readmission rates.


Subject(s)
Aftercare , Intensive Care Units , Quality Improvement , Aftercare/economics , Aftercare/methods , Aftercare/organization & administration , Aftercare/standards , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Intensive Care Units/economics , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Intensive Care Units/standards , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Patient Discharge , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Survivors
2.
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health ; 39(3): 114-23, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24135043

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Although Colombia partially liberalized its abortion law in 2006, many abortions continue to occur outside the law and result in complications. Assessing the costs to the health care system of safe, legal abortions and of treating complications of unsafe, illegal abortions has important policy implications. METHODS: The Post-Abortion Care Costing Methodology was used to produce estimates of direct and indirect costs of postabortion care and direct costs of legal abortions in Colombia. Data on estimated costs were obtained through structured interviews with key informants at a randomly selected sample of facilities that provide abortion-related care, including 25 public and private secondary and tertiary facilities and five primary-level private facilities that provide specialized reproductive health services. RESULTS: The median direct cost of treating a woman with abortion complications ranged from $44 to $141 (in U.S. dollars), representing an annual direct cost to the health system of about $14 million per year. A legal abortion at a secondary or tertiary facility was costly (medians, $213 and $189, respectively), in part because of the use of dilation and curettage, as well as because of administrative barriers. At specialized facilities, where manual vacuum aspiration and medication abortion are used, the median cost of provision was much lower ($45). CONCLUSIONS: Provision of postabortion care and legal abortion services at higher-level facilities results in unnecessarily high health care costs. These costs can be reduced significantly by providing services in a timely fashion at primary-level facilities and by using safe, noninvasive and less costly abortion methods.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Criminal/economics , Abortion, Induced/economics , Aftercare/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Women's Health Services/economics , Abortion, Criminal/statistics & numerical data , Abortion, Induced/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aftercare/statistics & numerical data , Colombia , Female , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Pregnancy , Women's Health/economics , Women's Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
3.
Cir Cir ; 81(3): 207-13, 2013.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23769249

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The elevated prevalence of osteoarthritis in Western countries, the high costs of hip and knee arthroplasty, and the wide variations in the clinical practice have generated considerable interest in comparing the associated costs before and after surgery. OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of a number of variables on the costs of total knee and hip arthroplasty surgery during the hospital stay and during the one-year post-discharge. METHODS: A prospective multi-center study was performed in 15 hospitals from three Spanish regions. Relationships between the independent variables and the costs of hospital stay and postdischarge follow-up were analyzed by using multilevel models in which the "hospital" variable was used to group cases. Independent variables were: age, sex, body mass index, preoperative quality of life (SF-12, EQ-5 and Womac questionnaires), surgery (hip/knee), Charlson Index, general and local complications, number of beds and economic-institutional dependency of the hospital, the autonomous region to which it belongs, and the presence of a caregiver. RESULTS: The cost of hospital stay, excluding the cost of the prosthesis, was 4,734 Euros, and the post-discharge cost was 554 Euros. With regard to hospital stay costs, the variance among hospitals explained 44-46% of the total variance among the patients. With regard to the post-discharge costs, the variability among hospitals explained 7-9% of the variance among the patients. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable potential for reducing the hospital stay costs of these patients, given that more than 44% of the observed variability was not determined by the clinical conditions of the patients but rather by the behavior of the hospitals.


antecedentes: la alta prevalencia de artrosis en los países occidentales, el elevado costo de las intervenciones de artroplastia de cadera y rodilla y las amplias variaciones en la práctica médica generan gran interés por comparar los costos asociados antes y después de la cirugía. Objetivo: conocer el costo de las intervenciones de reemplazo total de cadera y rodilla durante la estancia hospitalaria y al año de seguimiento posterior al alta. material y métodos: estudio multicéntrico y prospectivo efectuado en 15 hospitales de tres comunidades autónomas. La relación entre las variables independientes con el costo de la estancia y costo post-alta, se analizó con modelos multinivel y para agrupar los casos se utilizó la variable "hospital." Las variables independientes fueron: edad, sexo, índice de masa corporal, calidad de vida prequirúrgica (cuestionarios ED-5D, SF-12 y Womac), intervención (cadera-rodilla), índice Charlson, complicaciones, número de camas y dependencia económico-institucional del hospital, comunidad autó-noma y presencia de cuidador. Resultados: el costo promedio por paciente, sin incluir el costo de la prótesis, fue de 4,734 Euros ± 2,136 y el costo del seguimiento post alta de 554 Euros ± 509. Si se incluye el costo de la prótesis, al final del año el costo total asciende a 7,645 Euros ± 2,248. Conclusiones: existe un margen considerable en la reducción de los costos de estancia; más de 44% de la variabilidad observada no está determinada por las condiciones clínicas de los pacientes sino por el comportamiento de los centros hospitalarios.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/economics , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/economics , Aftercare/economics , Aged , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/rehabilitation , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/rehabilitation , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Resources/economics , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Hip Prosthesis/economics , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, University/economics , Humans , Knee Prosthesis/economics , Length of Stay/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Office Visits/economics , Prospective Studies , Spain
5.
J Pediatr ; 127(2): 285-90, 1995 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7636657

ABSTRACT

The effect of a cost-containment program focused on decreasing the lengths of hospital stay of high-risk neonates was assessed by comparison of discharge weights and lengths of stay for 257 study infants, discharged from a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) after an early-discharge program began, with those of 477 control infants discharged during a prior 1-year period. Demographic data and costs, as well as data on emergency department use and hospital readmissions, were included in the comparisons. There was a significant decrease in mean discharge weight and length of stay for infants in the study group. During a 7-month period, an estimated 2073 days of hospital care and approximately $2,700,000 in hospital charges were saved, or $10,609 per infant discharged. The cost of instituting and maintaining the program was $120,413, or $468 per infant. Seven visits were made to the emergency department by the study infants during the first 14 days after discharge. One infant was readmitted for a 4-day hospital stay for suspected sepsis. Significantly earlier discharge of high-risk neonates produced a decrease in hospital charges without causing excessive morbidity. The success of the program was coincident and presumed related to the institution of multiple elements focused toward family support through early-discharge planning. The reduction in hospital charges was 30 times higher than program expenses.


Subject(s)
Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Infant, Low Birth Weight , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/economics , Patient Discharge , Aftercare/economics , Case-Control Studies , Cost Control , Female , Home Care Services/economics , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/economics , Male , Ohio , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Readmission , Program Development , Program Evaluation , Time Factors
6.
Med Care ; 30(1): 1-16, 1992 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1309585

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to group hospital-based home care (HBHC) patients homogeneously by their characteristics with respect to cost of care to develop alternative case mix methods for management and reimbursement (allocation) purposes. Six Veterans Affairs (VA) HBHC programs in Fiscal Year (FY) 1986 that maximized patient, program, and regional variation were selected, all of which agreed to participate. All HBHC patients active in each program on October 1, 1987, in addition to all new admissions through September 30, 1988 (FY88), comprised the sample of 874 unique patients. Statistical methods include the use of classification and regression trees (CART software: Statistical Software; Lafayette, CA), analysis of variance, and multiple linear regression techniques. The resulting algorithm is a three-factor model that explains 20% of the cost variance (R2 = 20%, with a cross validation R2 of 12%). Similar classifications such as the RUG-II, which is utilized for VA nursing home and intermediate care, the VA outpatient resource allocation model, and the RUG-HHC, utilized in some states for reimbursing home health care in the private sector, explained less of the cost variance and, therefore, are less adequate for VA home care resource allocation.


Subject(s)
Aftercare/classification , Diagnosis-Related Groups/statistics & numerical data , Home Care Services/classification , Hospitals, Veterans/organization & administration , Models, Econometric , Models, Statistical , Aftercare/economics , Aftercare/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Algorithms , Analysis of Variance , Cost Allocation , Costs and Cost Analysis , Diagnosis-Related Groups/economics , Female , Home Care Services/economics , Home Care Services/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Veterans/economics , Humans , Male , Mathematical Computing , Prospective Studies , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Socioeconomic Factors , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL