ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Brain expansion during ontogeny has been identified as a key factor for explaining the growth pattern of neurocranial bones. However, the dynamics of this relation are only partially understood and a detailed characterization of integrated morphological changes of the brain and the neurocranium along ontogeny is still lacking. The aim of this study was to model the effect of brain growth on cranial bones by means of finite-element analysis (FEA) and geometric morphometric techniques. METHODS: First, we described the postnatal changes in brain size and shape by digitizing coordinates of 3D semilandmarks on cranial endocasts, as a proxy of brain, segmented from CT-scans of an ontogenetic sample. Then, two scenarios of brain growth were simulated: one in which brain volume increases with the same magnitude in all directions, and other that includes the information on the relative expansion of brain regions obtained from morphometric analysis. RESULTS: Results indicate that in the first model, in which a uniform pressure is applied, the largest displacements were localized in the sutures, especially in the anterior and posterior fontanels, as well as the metopic suture. When information of brain relative growth was introduced into the model, displacements were also concentrated in the lambda region although the values along both sides of the neurocranium (parietal and temporal bones) were larger than under the first scenario. CONCLUSION: In sum, we propose a realistic approach to the use of FEA based on morphometric data that offered different results to more simplified models.
Subject(s)
Brain/growth & development , Models, Biological , Organ Size/physiology , Skull/growth & development , Adolescent , Anatomic Landmarks/diagnostic imaging , Anatomic Landmarks/growth & development , Brain/anatomy & histology , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Child , Child, Preschool , Finite Element Analysis , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Skull/anatomy & histology , Skull/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
Predicting the possible age-related changes to a child's face, age progression methods modify the shape, colour and texture of a facial image while retaining the identity of the individual. However, the techniques vary between different practitioners. This study combines different age progression techniques for juvenile subjects, various researches based on longitudinal radiographic data; physical anthropometric measurements of the head and face; and digital image measurements in pixels. Utilising 12 anthropometric measurements of the face, this study documents a new workflow for digital manual age progression. An inter-observer error study (n = 5) included the comparison of two age progressions of the same individual at different ages. The proposed age progression method recorded satisfactory levels of repeatability based on the 12 anthropometric measurements. Seven measurements achieved an error below 8.60%. Facial anthropometric measurements involving the nasion (n) and trichion (tr) showed the most inconsistency (14-34% difference between the practitioners). Overall, the horizontal measurements were more accurate than the vertical measurements. The age progression images were compared using a manual morphological method and machine-based face recognition. The confidence scores generated by the three different facial recognition APIs suggested the performance of any age progression not only varies between practitioners, but also between the Facial recognition systems. The suggested new workflow was able to guide the positioning of the facial features, but the process of age progression remains dependant on artistic interpretation.
Subject(s)
Aging/physiology , Anatomic Landmarks/growth & development , Anthropometry , Face/physiology , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Maxillofacial Development , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Forecasting , Humans , Male , Photography , Software , WorkflowABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Understanding craniofacial growth and development is important for accurate diagnosis, treatment planning and post-treatment evaluation of orthodontic cases. Paramount to this is knowledge of the cranial base growth and development, since it is the foundation upon which the remaining facial structures develop. The purpose of this study was to analyse different anatomical structures in the posterior cranial base and determine its changes during the adolescent years (13-15 year of age) using CBCT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty CBCT images of the adolescent population that received orthodontic treatment at two time-points (mean age T1: 13.1 years/T2: 14.6years) were used to assess growth related dimensional changes using 33 selected landmarks. Inter-rater, intra-rater and accuracy of 33 selected landmarks in the posterior cranial base and surrounding area were then evaluated via three-dimensional (3D) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Linear differences were then calculated among the different landmarks to determine the changes present in the sample. RESULTS: The selected landmarks in the posterior cranial base and surrounding area were found to be reliably and accurately located in 3D. Over the growth period studied (17.5months), minor statistically significant changes occurred, but they were deemed clinically irrelevant. CONCLUSIONS: The studied landmarks in the posterior cranial base and surrounding area showed minor clinically insignificant changes over the study period. The observed changes could be attributed to measurement error. The posterior cranial base is deemed to be stable in all three dimensions of study during the adolescent growth period studied.
Subject(s)
Anatomic Landmarks/diagnostic imaging , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Skull Base/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Anatomic Landmarks/growth & development , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods , Female , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Skull Base/growth & developmentABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine if a new facial line (T), tangent to the throat, intersects the mandibular border in anterior (ANT) and posterior (POST) parts in proportions varying with facial configuration, and to evaluate the association between chin projection and throat inclination and the potential for the T-line to reflect this association. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Measurements on profile photographs and cephalograms of 135 adults (aged 18-50 years)-45 each of Class I, II, and III (CI, CII, CIII) malocclusions-included ANT and POST, chin-throat (CTA), and mento-cervical (MCA) angles. Pre- and posttreatment measurements were compared in two subgroups (n = 25 each) of CII and CIII orthognathic surgery patients and in CII, division 1 early-treatment patients (n = 63). Statistics included analysis of variance and t-test for group differences, and Pearson correlation for associations among variables. RESULTS: ANT was nearly equal to POST in CI (50.99%) and CIII (51.86%) subjects and shorter in CII (36.01%) subjects. CTA and MCA were greater in CII profiles and smaller in CIII profiles. Significant differences (P < .0001) were observed for ANT, POST, CTA, and MCA between Classes I/II and II/III and for MCA between Classes II/III (P = .016). High correlations were noted between ANT and CTA in Classes I (r = -0.83), II (r = -0.73), and III (r = -0.68). In surgically treated patients, posttreatment measurements approached CI values. In the early-treatment group, ANT increased but remained smaller than POST; CTA decreased by nearly 13%. CONCLUSIONS: Chin-throat relations and chin extension are associated and require routine assessment in terms of diagnosis and treatment outcome. A practical tool to assess chin-throat relationship, the T-line bisects the mandibular body nearly equally in Class I faces.
Subject(s)
Chin/anatomy & histology , Chin/growth & development , Malocclusion/surgery , Malocclusion/therapy , Orthognathic Surgery , Pharynx/anatomy & histology , Pharynx/growth & development , Adolescent , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Anatomic Landmarks/anatomy & histology , Anatomic Landmarks/diagnostic imaging , Anatomic Landmarks/growth & development , Cephalometry/methods , Chin/diagnostic imaging , Face/anatomy & histology , Female , Humans , Male , Mandible/anatomy & histology , Mandible/diagnostic imaging , Mandible/growth & development , Middle Aged , Neck/anatomy & histology , Neck/diagnostic imaging , Orthodontics, Corrective/methods , Pharynx/diagnostic imaging , Photography , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Initially, cone-beam computed tomography images from dry skulls were used to 3 dimensionally evaluate intrarater and interrater reliabilities and accuracy of selected 3-dimensional landmarks located in the anterior and middle cranial bases. Thereafter, dimensional changes of the anterior and middle cranial bases with growth were evaluated by using the previously selected landmarks. METHODS: Cone-beam computed tomography images of 10 dry skulls were used to identify useful landmarks from different areas of the anterior and middle cranial bases based on their reliability and accuracy. These selected landmarks were identified in the images of an already available sample of adolescents (n = 60) taken at 2 time points (19 months apart) to assess dimensional changes with growth. RESULTS: The majority of the proposed 3-dimensional landmarks with the exception of the lesser wing of the sphenoid showed acceptable intrarater and interrater reliabilities. The distances measured between foramina and canals in the transverse dimension showed evidence of increases in size. However, the mean amounts of increase in these transverse distances were equal to or less than 1.05 mm (from 1.1% to 4.1%). No change was observed between the right and left anterior and posterior clinoid processes. The vertical dimensions showed evidence of some changes, but these were within 2% of the original distances. CONCLUSIONS: In this adolescent sample, minor growth-related changes were observed in the anterior and middle cranial bases. The midsagittal area of the anterior cranial base (foramen caecum to presphenoid) was stable. The right and left anterior and posterior clinoid processes can be used for transverse superimposition.
Subject(s)
Anatomic Landmarks/diagnostic imaging , Anatomic Landmarks/growth & development , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Skull Base/diagnostic imaging , Skull Base/growth & development , Adolescent , Child , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
AIM: The reported effects of Bionator treatment in patients with mandibular retrognathism are conflicting. This study evaluated the changes in craniofacial morphology resulting from treatment with a Bionator, based on measurement percentiles previously reported, to clarify the mechanism of the effect of this commonly used functional device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study Design: Retrospective. SETTING: A private orthodontic clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-two children (mean age, 10.13 years) requiring treatment with a Bionator for Class II malocclusion (mandibular retrognathism). Children were randomly assigned to a Bionator group with or without an expansion screw. Measurements on lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken before and upon completion of Bionator treatment. All parameters measured were characterised according to the measurement percentiles previously reported. Each parameter was compared before and after treatment for all patients and for each treatment group using Wilcoxon's test. RESULTS: No significant differences in cranial length or mandibular body length were seen in any of the 3 groups, but anterior cranial base length and maxillary length were significantly decreased while mandibular ramus height and mandibular length were significantly increased after treatment in the Bionator with expansion screw group and in the all-patient group. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that treatment with a Bionator with expansion screw during the growth and development stage results in increased mandible length and ramus height and inhibits the growth of the maxilla and anterior cranial base bone.
Subject(s)
Activator Appliances , Malocclusion, Angle Class II/therapy , Orthodontic Appliance Design , Retrognathia/therapy , Adolescent , Anatomic Landmarks/growth & development , Anatomic Landmarks/pathology , Cephalometry/methods , Child , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Mandible/growth & development , Mandible/pathology , Mandibular Condyle/growth & development , Mandibular Condyle/pathology , Maxilla/growth & development , Maxilla/pathology , Nasal Bone/pathology , Pterygopalatine Fossa/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Sella Turcica/pathology , Skull Base/growth & development , Skull Base/pathologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) methods have been criticized because of their subjective nature. The aims of this study were (1) to analyze the morphometric changes in the outline of the second to fourth cervical vertebrae with growth and (2) to test the validity of the CVM method for determining the mandibular growth peak. METHODS: Lateral cephalograms of 25 participants from ages 10 to 16 years were acquired from the Burlington Growth Study, and the CVM stage was qualitatively determined. Mandibular and cervical vertebral semilandmarks were then digitized, and point distribution models were used to describe the morphometric templates of the vertebrae in relation to chronologic age and the timing of peak mandibular growth. Mixed model analysis was used to determine the relationship between mandibular length, sex, CVM stage, and chronologic age. RESULTS: Morphometric changes of the second to fourth cervical vertebrae during growth were consistent with the CVM descriptions. However, mandibular length changes were not significantly associated with CVM stages after adjusting for chronologic age. Morphometric templates of vertebral shapes before and during the mandibular growth peak were similar, with changes detectable only after the growth peak had passed. Morphometric vertebral shape changes varied between the sexes. CONCLUSIONS: Morphometric changes of the cervical vertebrae and the CVM method could not accurately identify the mandibular growth peak.
Subject(s)
Age Determination by Skeleton/methods , Cervical Vertebrae/growth & development , Mandible/growth & development , Adolescent , Age Determination by Skeleton/statistics & numerical data , Anatomic Landmarks/anatomy & histology , Anatomic Landmarks/growth & development , Axis, Cervical Vertebra/anatomy & histology , Axis, Cervical Vertebra/growth & development , Cephalometry/methods , Cervical Vertebrae/anatomy & histology , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Mandible/anatomy & histology , Mandibular Condyle/anatomy & histology , Mandibular Condyle/growth & development , Reproducibility of Results , Sex FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Frontoorbital advancement (FOA) in patients with non-syndromic craniosynostosis mainly addresses the aesthetic and functional correction of the frontoorbital region. To help define the operative strategy and any follow-up assessments after surgical correction, objective parameters describing the critical regions of skull deformity are essential. Based on 3D morphometric analysis, new parameters for the documentation of changes of the frontoorbital bandeau were developed in a prospective study. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In a prospective series, 13 children with non-syndromic craniosynostosis (seven metopic, four unilateral coronal, and two bilateral coronal) treated with frontoorbital advancement, underwent detailed morphometric and volumetric evaluation using a 3D light optical scan system (3D-Shape, Erlangen, Germany). Measurements were obtained preoperatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively with newly developed parameters generated by cephalometric analysis software (Onyx Ceph, Image Instruments, Chemnitz, Germany). RESULTS: In most patients, frontoorbital advancement resulted in stable long-term results without growth inhibition and with normalization or improvement of ongoing skull development. The mean frontal angle was 145° and the frontoparietal angle 137-140°. The cephalic index was normalized or markedly improved. Head circumference and head height increased significantly (p = 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). These changes were confirmed in all postoperative measurements. CONCLUSION: During the 12-month follow-up period all angle parameters proved to be stable and no major impairment of normal skull growth was observed after FOA. The frontoorbital angle is a useful parameter in evaluating long-term outcome. The frontoparietal angle is important for the stability of the frontoparietal region, in which a certain growth inhibition may be observed postoperatively.
Subject(s)
Craniosynostoses/surgery , Craniotomy/methods , Frontal Bone/surgery , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Orbit/surgery , Anatomic Landmarks/growth & development , Anatomic Landmarks/pathology , Bone Development/physiology , Cephalometry/methods , Cranial Sutures/surgery , Follow-Up Studies , Frontal Bone/growth & development , Frontal Bone/pathology , Humans , Infant , Optical Imaging/methods , Orbit/growth & development , Parietal Bone/pathology , Parietal Bone/surgery , Photogrammetry/methods , Prospective Studies , Skull/growth & development , Skull/pathology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess growth of the middle/posterior cranial base during adolescence based on landmarks located on serial three-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CBCT scans from 62 adolescents (11 to 17 years) at baseline and 12 months were used. Eleven landmarks in the cranial base were identified. Linear landmark distances were compared over the two time points using basic descriptive statistics. Shape analysis was carried out using R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Austria). Discrete curves were obtained and aligned via a Procrustes transformation and examined for group dimorphism and longitudinal change. RESULTS: Mean differences between linear distances in the cranial base were within 1mm, apart from the difference between the right and left auditory external meatuses, which was 2.25 mm. No statistically significant longitudinal differences in shape were found in relation to the peak growth period. CONCLUSION: Cranial base growth was minimal over the observation period. There were no differences in terms of the amount and pattern of growth. The cranial base is said to complete most of its growth by age 12, but this has only been verified through two-dimensional studies. Our findings using CBCT confirm this, and support the use of the cranial base as a stable anatomical reference structure for superimpositioning.
Subject(s)
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods , Skull Base/growth & development , Adolescent , Anatomic Landmarks/diagnostic imaging , Anatomic Landmarks/growth & development , Cephalometry/methods , Child , Ear Canal/diagnostic imaging , Ear Canal/growth & development , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Foramen Magnum/diagnostic imaging , Foramen Magnum/growth & development , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Male , Orbit/diagnostic imaging , Orbit/growth & development , Pilot Projects , Retrospective Studies , Skull Base/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Despite discussion on the merit of various cephalometric superimposition methods, there remains a need to assess which one can be used in daily practice with reasonably accuracy and less working time. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate four methods of cephalometric superimposition by means of assessing the longitudinal changes in craniofacial morphology caused by growth and response of adolescents with Class I malocclusion to orthodontic treatment involving first premolar extraction. METHODS: Pretreatment (T1) and post-treatment (T2) standardized lateral cephalometric radiographs of 31 adolescents (20 females and 11 males), with Angle Class I malocclusion and indication of premolar extraction, participated in this study. Radiographs were digitized, traced and had structures identified by means of a cephalometric software. Four superimposition methods were used: Björk structural method, Steiner/Tweed SN line, Ricketts N-Ba line at N-point and Ricketts N-Ba line at CC-point. Positional changes were quantified by horizontal and vertical linear changes in the following cephalometric landmarks: anterior/posterior nasal spine (ANS and PNS), gnathion (Gn), Gonion (Go), Pogonion (Pog), A-point and B-point. Differences between T1 and T2 in horizontal and vertical positional changes for all superimposition methods were assessed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni correction (p < 0.05). RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences among the cephalometric superimposition methods or when patients' sex was considered. CONCLUSION: Björk structural method, Steiner/Tweed SN line, Ricketts N-Ba line at N-point and Ricketts N-Ba line at CC-point methods were reliable and presented similar precision when the overall facial changes due to active growth and/or orthodontic treatment were examined.
Subject(s)
Cephalometry/methods , Malocclusion, Angle Class I/diagnostic imaging , Orthodontics, Corrective/methods , Radiography, Dental, Digital/methods , Adolescent , Anatomic Landmarks/diagnostic imaging , Anatomic Landmarks/growth & development , Bicuspid/surgery , Chin/diagnostic imaging , Chin/growth & development , Facial Bones/diagnostic imaging , Facial Bones/growth & development , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Malocclusion, Angle Class I/therapy , Mandible/diagnostic imaging , Mandible/growth & development , Maxilla/diagnostic imaging , Maxilla/growth & development , Nasal Bone/diagnostic imaging , Nasal Bone/growth & development , Retrospective Studies , Skull/diagnostic imaging , Skull/growth & development , Tooth Extraction/methodsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Despite discussion on the merit of various cephalometric superimposition methods, there remains a need to assess which one can be used in daily practice with reasonably accuracy and less working time. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate four methods of cephalometric superimposition by means of assessing the longitudinal changes in craniofacial morphology caused by growth and response of adolescents with Class I malocclusion to orthodontic treatment involving first premolar extraction. METHODS: Pretreatment (T1) and post-treatment (T2) standardized lateral cephalometric radiographs of 31 adolescents (20 females and 11 males), with Angle Class I malocclusion and indication of premolar extraction, participated in this study. Radiographs were digitized, traced and had structures identified by means of a cephalometric software. Four superimposition methods were used: Björk structural method, Steiner/Tweed SN line, Ricketts N-Ba line at N-point and Ricketts N-Ba line at CC-point. Positional changes were quantified by horizontal and vertical linear changes in the following cephalometric landmarks: anterior/posterior nasal spine (ANS and PNS), gnathion (Gn), Gonion (Go), Pogonion (Pog), A-point and B-point. Differences between T1 and T2 in horizontal and vertical positional changes for all superimposition methods were assessed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni correction (p < 0.05). RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences among the cephalometric superimposition methods or when patients' sex was considered. CONCLUSION: Björk structural method, Steiner/Tweed SN line, Ricketts N-Ba line at N-point and Ricketts N-Ba line at CC-point methods were reliable and presented similar precision when the overall facial changes due to active growth and/or orthodontic treatment were examined. .
INTRODUÇÃO: apesar dos debates sobre os méritos dos vários métodos de sobreposição cefalométrica, ainda há necessidade de se avaliar quais deles poderiam ser utilizados na prática diária, com razoável precisão e menor tempo de trabalho. OBJETIVO: o objetivo desta pesquisa foi investigar quatro métodos de sobreposição cefalométrica, avaliando as mudanças longitudinais na morfologia craniofacial causadas pelo crescimento e resposta ao tratamento, em adolescentes com má oclusão de Classe I tratados ortodonticamente com extração de primeiros pré-molares. MÉTODOS: foram usadas telerradiografias laterais pré-tratamento (T1) e pós-tratamento (T2) de 31 adolescentes (20 do sexo feminino e 11 do sexo masculino), com Classe I de Angle e indicação de extração de pré-molares. As radiografias foram digitalizadas, traçadas e as estruturas, identificadas com um software cefalométrico (Radiocef, Radio Memory, Belo Horizonte, Brasil). Quatro métodos de sobreposição foram utilizados para avaliar mudanças de posição devidas ao crescimento e/ou tratamento: método Estrutural de Björk; método Steiner/Tweed linha SN; Ricketts linha N-Ba no ponto N; e Ricketts linha N-Ba no ponto CC. As mudanças posicionais avaliadas pelos métodos de sobreposição foram quantificadas por mudanças lineares horizontais e verticais nos seguintes pontos cefalométricos: espinha nasal anterior (ENA), espinha nasal posterior (ENP), gnátio (Gn), Gônio (Go), Pogônio (Pog), Ponto A e Ponto B. Mudanças de posição horizontal e vertical entre T1 e T2 para todos os métodos de sobreposição foram avaliadas por análise de variância (ANOVA) e teste de Bonferroni (p < 0,05). RESULTADOS: não houve diferença estatística significativa entre os métodos de sobreposição cefalométrica em toda a amostra ou quando o sexo dos pacientes foi considerado. CONCLUSÃO: de acordo com a metodologia aplicada nesse estudo, os métodos de sobreposição cefalométrica Estrutural de Björk, de Steiner/Tweed linha SN, ...
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Orthodontics, Corrective/methods , Cephalometry/methods , Radiography, Dental, Digital/methods , Malocclusion, Angle Class I/diagnostic imaging , Tooth Extraction/methods , Bicuspid/surgery , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Retrospective Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Longitudinal Studies , Chin/growth & development , Chin/diagnostic imaging , Facial Bones/growth & development , Facial Bones/diagnostic imaging , Anatomic Landmarks/growth & development , Anatomic Landmarks/diagnostic imaging , Malocclusion, Angle Class I/therapy , Mandible/growth & development , Mandible/diagnostic imaging , Maxilla/growth & development , Maxilla/diagnostic imaging , Nasal Bone/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to analyze the craniofacial morphology in patients with unrepaired isolated cleft palate (UICP) at childhood, adolescence and adulthood, in order to assess the influence of nonsurgical factors on the craniofacial growth in these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Lateral and posteroanterior cephalograms of 106 non-syndromic UICP patients and 102 normal matched controls were obtained and analyzed. Patients and controls were divided into three subgroups: children (5-7 years), adolescents (12-14 years), and adults (>18 years). RESULTS: UICP patients in childhood showed a shortened cranial basal length; reduced bony nasopharyngeal height; short maxillary depth and height with a posterior positioned maxilla and an increased width of the nasal cavity, maxilla and orbit; and a shortened mandibular length and height. UICP patients in adulthood showed a normal nasopharyngeal and mandibular morphology. However, the patients in this subgroup still showed a shortened cranial basal length, and short maxillary depth and anterior height with increased width of the nasal cavity, maxilla and orbit. CONCLUSIONS: Craniofacial morphology and growth in patients with UICP were significantly affected by nonsurgical factors. Growth of the cranial base and upper face were absolutely reduced, while growth of the bony nasopharynx and mandible were only postponed.
Subject(s)
Cephalometry/methods , Cleft Palate/pathology , Facial Bones/pathology , Maxillofacial Development/physiology , Skull/pathology , Adolescent , Adult , Anatomic Landmarks/growth & development , Anatomic Landmarks/pathology , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Cleft Palate/physiopathology , Facial Bones/growth & development , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Mandible/growth & development , Mandible/pathology , Maxilla/growth & development , Maxilla/pathology , Nasal Cavity/growth & development , Nasal Cavity/pathology , Nasopharynx/growth & development , Nasopharynx/pathology , Orbit/growth & development , Orbit/pathology , Skull/growth & development , Skull Base/growth & development , Skull Base/pathology , Young AdultABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The anterior cranial base has long been considered a stable reference structure for superimposing radiographs. However, some studies have questioned its stability. Therefore, the purposes of this systematic review were to give an overview of the studies evaluating growth and development of the anterior cranial base, assess their methodologic quality, and evaluate their validity and accuracy. METHODS: Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched without limitations up to June 2013. Additionally, the bibliographies of the finally selected articles were hand searched to identify any relevant publications that were not identified before. The lowest levels of evidence accepted for inclusion were cohort and cross-sectional studies. RESULTS: A total of 11 articles met all inclusion criteria. They were published between 1955 and 2009. The sample sizes of these studies ranged from 28 to 464 subjects. Their methodologic quality ranged from moderate to low. CONCLUSIONS: Sella turcica remodels backward and downward, and nasion moves forward because of the increase in size of the frontal sinus. These events lead to a continuous increase in the length of the cranial base until adulthood. The presphenoid and cribriform plate regions can be considered stable after age 7, making them the best cranial-base superimposition areas.
Subject(s)
Cephalometry/statistics & numerical data , Skull Base/growth & development , Anatomic Landmarks/diagnostic imaging , Anatomic Landmarks/growth & development , Frontal Sinus/diagnostic imaging , Frontal Sinus/growth & development , Humans , Nasal Bone/diagnostic imaging , Nasal Bone/growth & development , Radiography , Reproducibility of Results , Sella Turcica/diagnostic imaging , Sella Turcica/growth & development , Skull Base/diagnostic imaging , Sphenoid Bone/diagnostic imaging , Sphenoid Bone/growth & developmentABSTRACT
In this study we describe the development of the female femur based on the analysis of high-resolution radiographic images by means of geometric morphometrics, while assessing the usefulness of this method in these kinds of studies. The material analysed consisted of digital images in DICOM format (telemetries), corresponding to 184 left femora in anterior view, obtained from the database of the Hospital Sant Joan de Déu of Barcelona (Spain). Bones analysed corresponded to individuals from 9 to 14â years old. Size and shape variation of the entire femur was quantified by 22 two-dimensional landmarks. Landmark digitisation errors were assessed using Procrustes anova test. Centroid size (CS) variation with age was evaluated by an anova test. Shape variation was assessed by principal component analysis. A mancova test between the first five principal components and age, using the CS as covariable, was applied. Results indicated that both size and shape vary significantly with age. Several age-related shape changes remained significant after removing the allometric effect. In general, an increase in the robustness of the bone and noticeable phenotypic changes in certain areas of the femur were observed. During growth in the proximal region of the femur, the collo-diaphyseal angle decreases, the neck of the femur widens and the fovea moves to a lower position, standing more in line with the plane of the neck. Likewise, the size of the greater and lesser trochanters increase. In the distal region, a significant increase of epiphyseal dimensions was recorded, mainly in the medial condyle. The angular remodelling of the neck and the bicondylar region of the femur in females continues until 13â years old. The information provided in the present study increases our knowledge on the timing and morphology of the femur during development, and in particular the morphology of the different femoral ossification centres during development.
Subject(s)
Anatomic Landmarks/growth & development , Femur/growth & development , Adolescent , Age Factors , Analysis of Variance , Anatomic Landmarks/diagnostic imaging , Child , Diaphyses/diagnostic imaging , Diaphyses/growth & development , Female , Femur/anatomy & histology , Femur/diagnostic imaging , Growth Plate/growth & development , Humans , Principal Component Analysis , Radiography , SpainABSTRACT
The masticatory apparatus is a highly adaptive musculoskeletal complex comprising several relatively independent structural components, which assist in functions including feeding and breathing. We hypothesized that the tongue is elemental in the maintenance of normal ontogeny of the mandible and in its post-natal growth and development, and tested this using a morphometric approach. We assessed tongue and mandibular measurements in 174 (97 male) human cadavers. Landmark lingual and mandibular data were gathered individuals aged between 20 gestational weeks and 3 yr postnatal. In this analysis, geometric morphometrics assisted in visualizing the morphometrical growth changes in the mandible and tongue. A linear correlation in conjunction with principal component analysis further visualized the growth relationship between these structures. We found that the growth of the tongue and mandible were intrinsically linked in size and shape between 20 gestational weeks and 24 months postnatal. However, the mandible continued to change in shape and size into the 3rd yr of life, whereas the tongue only increased in size over this same period of time. These findings provide valuable insights into the allometric growth relationship between these structures, potentially assisting the clinician in predicting the behaviour of these structures in the assessment of malocclusions.
Subject(s)
Mandible/growth & development , Tongue/growth & development , Age Determination by Skeleton , Algorithms , Anatomic Landmarks/anatomy & histology , Anatomic Landmarks/embryology , Anatomic Landmarks/growth & development , Cadaver , Cephalometry/methods , Child, Preschool , Female , Fetus , Gestational Age , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Mandible/anatomy & histology , Mandible/embryology , Mandibular Condyle/anatomy & histology , Mandibular Condyle/embryology , Mandibular Condyle/growth & development , Principal Component Analysis , Tongue/anatomy & histology , Tongue/embryologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The nasal septum plays an important role in nasal growth, but there have been few reports on the relationship between the septum and nasal growth. The authors investigated the relationship between septa and external noses using computed tomography during the growth period. METHODS: One hundred and ninety-eight patients under the age of 21 were enrolled in this study between 2008 and 2012. The authors evaluated a total of 9 measurement items (five for nasal bones and septa, and four for external noses). RESULTS: In the final age group, most measurement items were significantly larger in males than in females. However, there was no remarkable difference between male and female growth processes. Nasal bridge length and nasal height were significantly correlated with the nasal bone or septum in almost all age groups. The relative proportion of the cartilaginous septum decreased significantly with age, and was negatively correlated with the perpendicular plate in all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Nasal septa and external noses were both larger in males than in females at the beginning of the study period, although not significantly. The differences became significant throughout the study due to differential increases between the sexes during the monitored growth spurts.
Subject(s)
Nasal Septum/growth & development , Nose/growth & development , Adolescent , Anatomic Landmarks/diagnostic imaging , Anatomic Landmarks/growth & development , Cephalometry/methods , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Frontal Sinus/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Infant , Male , Nasal Bone/diagnostic imaging , Nasal Bone/growth & development , Nasal Cartilages/diagnostic imaging , Nasal Cartilages/growth & development , Nasal Septum/diagnostic imaging , Nose/diagnostic imaging , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors , Sphenoid Sinus/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Vomer/diagnostic imaging , Vomer/growth & development , Young AdultABSTRACT
A critical review is presented of the basic properties and applications of cephalometry as a clinical tool with a focus on the evaluation of sagittal discrepancy. Diagnostic cephalometric assessments are subjective and not based on evidence. To assess individual skeletal and/or facial soft tissue form subjectively, selected norms are used. Norms have been developed for various ethnical groups to improve clinical applicability, but subjectivity remains. That subjectivity precludes application of a modern review system, making the present review a personal account. The cephalometric evaluation of sagittal discrepancy finds its historic origin in the Angle classification. Recent publications try to improve accuracy in classifying sagittal discrepancy. It remains unclear in what sense such efforts influence treatment decisions and/or treatment effect. Almost all selected landmarks are located on or dependent upon periosteal/endosteal bone image contours. Their homology is based on circumstantial reasoning and stability over time, which is implicitly assumed. However, implant growth studies and histological investigations show most landmarks to be unstable, as they are involved in displacement and bone remodelling. These landmarks are therefore heterologous when used for individual evaluation of change over time. Notwithstanding the above-indicated limitations, diagnostic cephalometric assessments are clinically useful and help to develop perceptions of balance and harmony and communication between colleagues and patients. There is no evidence-based method to prefer one particular diagnostic method. Landmark location accuracy and geometric issues do not play a decisive role. The subjective characteristic of diagnostic evaluations limits their power to size/shape comparisons. Structural superimposition is the valid biologically evidence-based method to provide advanced insight in individual growth and/or treatment changes and their variations.
Subject(s)
Cephalometry/statistics & numerical data , Facial Bones/diagnostic imaging , Anatomic Landmarks/diagnostic imaging , Anatomic Landmarks/growth & development , Bone Remodeling/physiology , Facial Bones/growth & development , Humans , Malocclusion/diagnosis , Patient Care Planning , RadiographyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine class and sex differences in mandibular growth and modeling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A mixed-longitudinal sample of 130 untreated French-Canadian adolescents, 77 (45 boys and 32 girls) with Class I (normal or abnormal) occlusion and 53 (26 boys and 27 girls) with Class II division 1 malocclusion, was used. Based on eight landmarks, eight traditional measurements were used to compare the anteroposterior position of the maxilla and mandible, relationship between the jaws, and mandibular size. Mandibular superimpositions were used to compare the horizontal and vertical changes of condylion, gonion, and menton. RESULTS: While there were no differences in maxillary position based on the SNA angle, Class IIs had more retrognathic mandibles than did Class Is. Total mandibular length was greater in Class Is than in Class IIs at 15 years of age. Superior and total growth and modeling changes at condylion and gonion, respectively, were greater for Class Is than Class IIs. Boys were more prognathic than girls; they had larger mandibles and exhibited greater size increases and growth changes than girls did. CONCLUSIONS: There are both class and sex differences in mandibular growth and modeling.
Subject(s)
Malocclusion, Angle Class II/physiopathology , Malocclusion, Angle Class I/physiopathology , Mandible/growth & development , Adolescent , Age Factors , Anatomic Landmarks/growth & development , Anatomic Landmarks/pathology , Cephalometry/methods , Child , Chin/growth & development , Chin/pathology , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Malocclusion, Angle Class I/pathology , Malocclusion, Angle Class II/pathology , Mandible/pathology , Mandibular Condyle/growth & development , Mandibular Condyle/pathology , Maxilla/growth & development , Maxilla/pathology , Nasal Bone/growth & development , Nasal Bone/pathology , Prognathism/pathology , Prognathism/physiopathology , Retrognathia/pathology , Retrognathia/physiopathology , Sella Turcica/growth & development , Sella Turcica/pathology , Sex FactorsABSTRACT
AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of periosteum on the healing and growth of mandible after mandibular outer cortex osteotomy using three-dimensional computed tomography. METHODS: Eighteen 3-month-old miniature pigs were randomized into three groups. The mandibular outer cortex osteotomy was performed on both sides in group I, and on the left side in group II. In groups I and II, the local periosteum on the left side was resected. In group III, no operation was performed. The evaluation of mandibular morphology of all the animals was performed based on multiple spiral CT data before and after surgery. RESULTS: The bone defects healed well when the periosteum was preserved, whereas they healed poorly with residual bone defects when the periosteum was resected after surgery. When the periosteum was resected, the decrease in the mean thickness of the mandibular body was more than that of the contralateral side after surgery. In group I, about 66.7% of the animals exhibited mandible deviation at 24 weeks after surgery. The median point of mentum was inclined toward the side that the periosteum was preserved. In groups II and III, no mandible deviation was observed. CONCLUSION: The periosteum plays an important role in bone growth and fracture healing. Mandibular outer cortex osteotomy inhibited the mandibular development and resulted in postoperative mandibular deviation in young miniature pigs. The simultaneous periosteum resection may offset the phenomenon of mandibular deviation to a certain extent.
Subject(s)
Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Mandible/surgery , Osteotomy/methods , Periosteum/physiology , Tomography, Spiral Computed/methods , Anatomic Landmarks/diagnostic imaging , Anatomic Landmarks/growth & development , Animals , Cephalometry/methods , Dental Arch/diagnostic imaging , Dental Arch/growth & development , Dissection/methods , Mandible/diagnostic imaging , Mandible/growth & development , Osteotomy/instrumentation , Periosteum/diagnostic imaging , Periosteum/surgery , Random Allocation , Swine , Swine, Miniature , Time Factors , Wound Healing/physiologyABSTRACT
We have recently presented the Old Spanish Pointer dog, with a 15-20% spontaneous congenital cleft palate rate, as a unique experimental model of this disease. This study aimed to describe the cleft palate of these dogs for surgical research purposes and to determine whether congenital cleft palate influences maxillofacial growth. Seven newborn Old Spanish Pointer dogs of both sexes, comprising a cleft palate group (n = 4) and a normal palate group (n = 3), were fed using the same technique. Macroscopic photographs and plaster casts from the palate, lateral radiographs and computer tomograms of the skull were taken sequentially over 41 weeks, starting at week 5. The cleft morphology, the size and the tissue characteristics in these dogs resembled the human cleft better than current available animal models. During growth, the cleft width varies. Most of the transverse and longitudinal measures of the palate were statistically lower in the cleft palate group. The cleft palate group showed hypoplasia of the naso-maxillary complex. This model of congenital cleft palate seems suitable for surgical research purposes. A reduced maxillofacial pre- and post-natal development is associated to the congenital cleft palate in the Old Spanish Pointer dog.