Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 14.073
Filter
1.
BMC Urol ; 24(1): 135, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38951868

ABSTRACT

The ARASENS trial recruited 1306 men with metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer. It investigated the effect of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and systemic therapy docetaxel in combination with a third novel drug - daralutamide, compared with placebo on overall survival. Triple therapy with ADT, docetaxel and darolutamide resulted in improved overall survival rates as compared with ADT, docetaxel and placebo (HR 0.68; 95% CI, 0.57-0.80; p < 0.001). The side effect profile for both treatments was similar. This randomised, double blinded, placebo controlled study, was assessed to have a low risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Benzamides/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Survival Rate , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Docetaxel/therapeutic use , Pyrazoles
2.
Nagoya J Med Sci ; 86(2): 169-180, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38962407

ABSTRACT

Androgen receptor signaling inhibitors combined with androgen deprivation therapy have become the standard of care for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC), regardless of tumor volume or risk. However, survival of approximately one-third of these patients has not improved, necessitating further treatment escalation. On the other hand, for patients with oligometastatic mCSPC, there is an emerging role for local radiation therapy. Although data remain scarce, it is expected that treatment of both primary tumor as well as metastasis-directed therapy may improve survival outcomes. In these patients, systemic therapy may be de-escalated to intermittent therapy. However, precise risk stratification is necessary for risk-based treatment escalation or de-escalation. In addition to risk stratification based on clinical parameters, research has been conducted to incorporate genomic and/or transcriptomic data into risk stratification. In future, an integrated risk model is expected to precisely stratify patients and guide treatment strategies. Here, we first review the transition of the standard treatment for mCSPC over the last decade and further discuss the newest concept of escalating or de-escalating treatment using a multi-modal approach based on the currently available literature.


Subject(s)
Neoplasm Metastasis , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/therapy , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use
4.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(6): e2415911, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38857047

ABSTRACT

Importance: Prostate cancer in Black men compared with White men may be more sensitive to radiation therapy resulting in better outcomes in equal-access settings. The outcomes of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) vs radiation therapy itself remains uncharacterized. Objectives: To quantify any outcome modification by receipt of ADT on the association between Black race and prostate cancer outcomes following radiation therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective, nationwide cohort study of Black and White patients treated in the US Veterans Healthcare system between 2000 and 2020 receiving definitive radiation for localized prostate cancer. Data were analyzed from January 2000 to December 2020. Exposure: Patient self-identified race and use of ADT defined as any gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist prescription within 6 months of radiation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Biochemical recurrence (BCR) from time of completion of radiation therapy (prostate-specific antigen nadir plus 2 ng/mL) and development of metastatic disease or prostate cancer mortality (PCSM) from time of recurrence. Results: A total of 26 542 patients (8716 Black men with median [IQR] age of 64 [59-69] years and 17 826 White men with median [IQR] age of 67 [62-72] years) received definitive radiation therapy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer and had complete staging and follow-up data. A total of 5144 patients experienced BCR (3384 White and 1760 Black patients). The cumulative incidence of BCR at 10 years was not significantly different between Black and White men (1602 [22.14%] vs 3099 [20.13%], respectively) with multivariable hazard ratio (HR) of 1.03 (95% CI, 0.97-1.09; P = .33). In men receiving ADT, Black men had an HR for BCR of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.82-0.99; P = .03) compared with White men, and in men not receiving ADT, Black men had an HR of 1.13 (95% CI, 1.05-1.22; P = .002). Black race was associated with a decreased risk of developing metastatic disease (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82-0.98; P = .02) or PCSM (subdistribution HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.63-0.82; P < .001) from time of biochemical recurrence. Conclusions and Relevance: Black patients treated with radiation appear to specifically benefit from the addition of ADT with regard to biochemical control. Additionally, BCR in Black men results in a lower rate of metastatic disease and death from prostate cancer. Future analyses of radiosensitivity in Black men should evaluate for the possibility of outcome modification by ADT.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists , Black or African American , Prostatic Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , White People/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
5.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 713, 2024 Jun 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38858662

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This paper attempted to clarify the role and mechanism of vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 72 homolog (VPS72) in the progression of prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: Clinical information and gene expression profiles of patients with prostate cancer were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). VPS72 expression in PCa and the potential mechanism by which VPS72 affects PCa progression was investigated. Next, we performed COX regression analysis to identify the independent prognostic factors of PCa, and constructed a nomogram. The sensitivity of chemotherapeutic medications was anticipated using "pRRophetic". Subsequently, in vitro assays to validate the effect of VPS72 on PCa cell proliferation, migration and susceptibility to anti-androgen therapy. RESULTS: The expression of VPS72 was considerably higher in PCa tissues compared to normal tissues. Significant correlations were found between high VPS72 expression and a poor prognosis and adverse clinicopathological factors. The nomogram model constructed based on VPS72 expression has good predictive performance. According to GSEA, VPS72-related genes were enriched in the NF-kB pathways, cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction and chemokine signaling pathway in PCa. Although PCa with low VPS72 expression was more adaptable to chemotherapeutic medications, our in vitro experiment showed that VPS72 knockdown significantly decreased the PCa cell migration, proliferation, and resistance to anti-androgen therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In summary our findings suggests that VPS72 could play a crucial role in the malignant progression of PCa, and its expression level can be employed as a possible biomarker of PCa prognosis.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor , Cell Proliferation , Disease Progression , Prostatic Neoplasms , Aged , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Androgen Antagonists/pharmacology , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Movement/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Nomograms , Prognosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Vesicular Transport Proteins/genetics , Vesicular Transport Proteins/metabolism
6.
Clin J Oncol Nurs ; 28(3): 247-251, 2024 May 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38830248

ABSTRACT

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is standard, first-line therapy for many aspects of prostate cancer treatment. Although ADT can be an effective treatment to inhibit androgen-fueled cell growth in prostate cancer, suppressi.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists , Prostatic Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Bone Neoplasms/drug therapy , Advanced Practice Nursing , Aged
7.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(6): e2414599, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38833251

ABSTRACT

Importance: It is uncertain to what extent watchful waiting (WW) in men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer (PCa) and a life expectancy of less than 10 years is associated with adverse consequences. Objective: To report transitions to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), death from PCa, or death from other causes in men treated with a WW strategy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationwide, population-based cohort study included men with nonmetastatic PCa diagnosed since 2007 and registered in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden with WW as the primary treatment strategy and with life expectancy less than 10 years. Life expectancy was calculated based on age, the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and a drug comorbidity index. Observed state transition models complemented observed data to extend follow-up to more than 20 years. Analyses were performed between 2022 and 2023. Exposure: Nonmetastatic PCa. Main Outcomes and Measures: Transitions to ADT, CRPC, death from PCa, and death from other causes were measured using state transition modeling. Results: The sample included 5234 men (median [IQR] age at diagnosis, 81 [79-84] years). After 5 years, 954 men with low-risk PCa (66.2%) and 740 with high-risk PCa (36.1%) were still alive and not receiving ADT. At 10 years, the corresponding proportions were 25.5% (n = 367) and 10.4% (n = 213), respectively. After 10 years, 59 men with low-risk PCa (4.1%) and 221 with high-risk PCa (10.8%) had transitioned to CRPC. Ten years after diagnosis, 1330 deaths in the low-risk group (92.3%) and 1724 in the high-risk group (84.1%) were from causes other than PCa. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that the WW management strategy is appropriate for minimizing adverse consequences of PCa in men with a baseline life expectancy of less than 10 years.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists , Prostatic Neoplasms , Watchful Waiting , Humans , Male , Watchful Waiting/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Sweden/epidemiology , Aged, 80 and over , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Life Expectancy , Registries , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Disease Progression
8.
Sci Adv ; 10(25): eadn8709, 2024 Jun 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38905345

ABSTRACT

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer is associated with an increased risk of dementia, including Alzheimer's disease (AD). The mechanistic connection between ADT and AD-related cognitive impairment in patients with prostate cancer remains elusive. We established a clinically relevant prostate cancer-bearing AD mouse model to explore this. Both tumor-bearing and ADT induce complex changes in immune and inflammatory responses in peripheral blood and in the brain. ADT disrupts the integrity of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and promotes immune cell infiltration into the brain, enhancing neuroinflammation and gliosis without affecting the amyloid plaque load. Moreover, treatment with natalizumab, an FDA-approved drug targeting peripheral immune cell infiltration, reduces neuroinflammation and improves cognitive function in this model. Our study uncovers an inflammatory mechanism, extending beyond amyloid pathology, that underlies ADT-exacerbated cognitive deficits, and suggests natalizumab as a potentially effective treatment in alleviating the detrimental effects of ADT on cognition.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Androgen Antagonists , Blood-Brain Barrier , Brain , Cognitive Dysfunction , Disease Models, Animal , Animals , Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Alzheimer Disease/pathology , Alzheimer Disease/metabolism , Male , Cognitive Dysfunction/drug therapy , Cognitive Dysfunction/chemically induced , Cognitive Dysfunction/pathology , Cognitive Dysfunction/etiology , Mice , Brain/drug effects , Brain/pathology , Brain/metabolism , Humans , Blood-Brain Barrier/drug effects , Blood-Brain Barrier/metabolism , Androgen Antagonists/adverse effects , Androgen Antagonists/pharmacology , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Natalizumab/adverse effects , Natalizumab/pharmacology , Natalizumab/therapeutic use , Plaque, Amyloid/pathology , Plaque, Amyloid/drug therapy
9.
Br J Gen Pract ; 74(suppl 1)2024 Jun 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38902070

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prostate Cancer (PCa) is the commonest cancer in the UK. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a mainstay of treatment. It increases fragility fractures causing a huge burden to patients and the NHS. As men live longer with PCa, many require prolonged ADT. Reducing fracture risks and improving cancer survivorship is becoming increasingly important. Primary care plays an important role. AIM: To evaluate how fracture risk of PCa patients taking ADT (PCa-ADT) was assessed and managed in primary care. METHOD: A retrospective multi-practice database study. PCa patients were identified using SNOMED codes from five sociodemographically diverse practices (registered population 49 400). Data were extracted by hand-searching records, including hospital letters, and included: demographics; a 10-year fragility fracture score (FRAX); NOGG intervention threshold; DEXA requests; and use of bisphosphonates. RESULTS: Of the 261 PCa patients identified, 6% were Black African/Caribbean and 89% White British. Half had been prescribed ADT, 28% being current users. No fracture risk assessment was documented for any patients. ADT current users had significantly increased FRAX scores for both major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) (9.61%±1.12%) and hip fracture (HF) (5.30%±1.02%) compared with PCa patients without ADT (7.08%±0.57% [MOF] and 3.06%±0.46% [HF], P<0.001). For ADT current users, 39% showed intermediate fracture risk (NOGG amber), warranting a DEXA scan, with only 30% performed. Patients in more affluent areas received more DEXA scans and bisphosphonate treatment. CONCLUSION: Osteoporosis is underdiagnosed and undertreated in men with PCa-ADT, especially in those with deprived backgrounds. There is an unmet need to manage the fracture prevention in this population.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists , Osteoporotic Fractures , Primary Health Care , Prostatic Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Androgen Antagonists/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Risk Assessment , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control , Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Databases, Factual , Absorptiometry, Photon , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Osteoporosis/epidemiology , Aged, 80 and over , Risk Factors
11.
Reproduction ; 168(2)2024 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38833564

ABSTRACT

In brief: Atrazine, like oestrogen, disorganises laminin formation and reduces the number of germ cells and Sertoli cells in the developing testes of the tammar wallaby. This study suggests that interfering with the balance of androgen and oestrogen affects the integrity of laminin structure and testis differentiation. Abstract: The herbicide atrazine was banned in Europe in 2003 due to its endocrine disrupting activity but remains widely used. The integrity of the laminin structure in fetal testis cords requires oestrogen signalling but overexposure to xenoestrogens in the adult can cause testicular dysgenesis. However, whether xenoestrogens affect laminin formation in developing testes has not been investigated. Here we examined the effects of atrazine in the marsupial tammar wallaby during early development and compare it with the effects of the anti-androgen flutamide, oestrogen, and the oestrogen degrader fulvestrant. The tammar, like all marsupials, gives birth to altricial young, allowing direct treatment of the developing young during the male programming window (day 20-40 post partum (pp)). Male pouch young were treated orally with atrazine (5 mg/kg), flutamide (10 mg/kg), 17ß-oestradiol (2.5 mg/kg) and fulvestrant (1 mg/kg) daily from day 20 to 40 pp. Distribution of laminin, vimentin, SOX9 and DDX4, cell proliferation and mRNA expression of SRY, SOX9, AMH, and SF1 were examined in testes at day 50 post partum after the treatment. Direct exposure to atrazine, flutamide, 17ß-oestradiol, and fulvestrant all disorganised laminin but had no effect on vimentin distribution in testes. Atrazine reduced the number of germ cells and Sertoli cells when examined at day 40-50 pp and day 20 to 40 pp, respectively. Both flutamide and fulvestrant reduced the number of germ cells and Sertoli cells. Atrazine also downregulated SRY expression and impaired SOX9 nuclear translocation. Our results demonstrate that atrazine can compromise normal testicular differentiation during the critical male programming window.


Subject(s)
Atrazine , Cell Differentiation , Herbicides , Laminin , Testis , Male , Animals , Testis/drug effects , Testis/metabolism , Testis/cytology , Atrazine/pharmacology , Laminin/metabolism , Cell Differentiation/drug effects , Herbicides/pharmacology , Macropodidae/metabolism , Sertoli Cells/drug effects , Sertoli Cells/metabolism , Sertoli Cells/cytology , Estrogens/pharmacology , Estrogens/metabolism , Endocrine Disruptors/pharmacology , Cell Count , Androgen Antagonists/pharmacology , Flutamide/pharmacology
12.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 22(4): 102103, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38781786

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We previously reported that for men undergoing combined androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and radiation therapy (RT) for prostate cancer, substitution of LHRH-agonists with 5-α- reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) led to improved preservation of 6-month hormonal quality of life (hQOL). With longer term follow-up, we evaluated disease control. METHODS: In this non-randomized trial, men with unfavorable intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer, aged ≥70 years or with Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2, were treated with RT (78-79.2 Gy in 39-44 fractions) and either oral ADT (oADT; 5-ARI with antiandrogen) or standard of care ADT (SOC; leuprolide with antiandrogen) for up to 28 months. The primary endpoint was EPIC hQOL; secondary endpoints included biochemical control and survival as well as changes in cholesterol and hemoglobin levels. RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2018, 70 men were enrolled (40 in oADT; 30 in SOC). Median follow-up was 65 months [IQR 36-94]. Five-year freedom from biochemical failure for oADT and SOC was 89% versus 86%, disease free survival was 62% versus 69%, cancer-specific survival was 100% versus 96%, and overall survival was 70% versus 81% (all P>.1). Testosterone (2 mo through 3 yr) and hemoglobin levels (2 mo through 2 yr) were higher, and cholesterol levels (1 yr) were lower in the oADT groups (all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: In this non-randomized study, men treated with combined RT and oADT had better preservation of hQOL and comparable 5-year disease outcomes to men treated with SOC. Eugonadal testosterone with this approach may yield measurable benefits in cholesterol and hemoglobin levels.


Subject(s)
5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors , Androgen Antagonists , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone , Prostatic Neoplasms , Quality of Life , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Aged , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Androgen Antagonists/administration & dosage , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/agonists , 5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , 5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Leuprolide/administration & dosage , Leuprolide/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Follow-Up Studies , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
13.
South Med J ; 117(5): 245-253, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701845

ABSTRACT

Androgen deprivation therapy is the cornerstone of systemic management for prostate cancer but is associated with multiple adverse effects that must be considered during treatment. These effects occur because of the profound hypogonadism that is induced from lack of testosterone or due to the medications used in the treatment or in combination with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors. This article critically reviews the associations between androgen deprivation therapy, androgen receptor signaling inhibitors, and cardiovascular complications such as prolonged QT interval, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, venous thromboembolism, and peripheral arterial occlusive disease. These unfavorable outcomes reinforce the need for regular cardiovascular screening of patients undergoing androgen deprivation for the management of prostate cancer.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists , Cardiovascular Diseases , Prostatic Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Androgen Antagonists/adverse effects , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Hypogonadism/drug therapy , Hypogonadism/physiopathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Signal Transduction/drug effects
15.
Aust J Gen Pract ; 53(5): 291-300, 2024 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38697060

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy after skin cancer in men in Australia. Its management varies according to tumour stage. Due to the significant dependence on androgen receptor signalling, agents that interfere with this pathway (most commonly medical castration in the form of androgen deprivation therapy [ADT]) are the mainstay treatment of advanced disease. OBJECTIVE: This review provides a contemporary update on ADT, with further discussion of emerging novel therapies for primary care. DISCUSSION: ADT is currently indicated for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer, disease recurrence following attempted local curative therapy, as well as combined use with radiotherapy for intermediate/high-risk disease. There has been rapid development of new pharmaceuticals targeting the androgen receptor. These are reviewed historically with an emphasis placed on emerging therapies, their common side effects, and how to manage them in the general practice setting.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists , Prostatic Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/pharmacology , Australia
16.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 22(4): 102096, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38759335

ABSTRACT

Prostate carcinoma (PC), the second most diagnosed cancer globally, saw approximately 1,414,000 new cases in 2020, with 17% being de novo metastatic. In these cases, the 5-year relative survival rate is 32%. Metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) includes those with metastatic disease at initial diagnosis or after initial therapy without long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), eventually progressing to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The established therapeutic principle of ADT has persisted for 80 years, with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists like leuprorelin being commonly used. LHRH antagonists, such as degarelix, have also emerged. Recent advances in mHSPC treatment involve combination strategies with drugs proven effective in CRPC, considering prognostic factors like disease volume and presentation. This review outlines pivotal trials leading to drug approvals in mHSPC and proposes a treatment decision algorithm for the same, based on statement from the Tuscan Interdisciplinary Uro-Oncological Group. A multidisciplinary approach is crucial to tailor treatment intensity and weigh risks and benefits effectively.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Androgen Antagonists , Humans , Male , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/agonists , Neoplasm Metastasis
17.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 22(3): 102088, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38718699

ABSTRACT

Several phase II trials have investigated neoadjuvant novel androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) followed by radical prostatectomy (RP) in prostate cancer (PC) patients. However, data regarding complications of intense hormone therapy and surgical complications are scarce. Our objective was to evaluate the occurrence of cardiovascular (CV) and thromboembolic (TE) adverse events (AE) in patients with localized PC who have received intense neoadjuvant ADT followed by prostatectomy. A comprehensive search in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and conference abstracts was performed. The strategies were developed and applied for each electronic database on March 7th, 2023. Eligible studies included randomized and single-arm trials testing ARSIs prior to prostatectomy that adequately reported safety data regarding CV and TE AE, peri-operative complications, and mortality during therapy. Pooled incidence (PI) of AE with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was estimated using a random effects model. Quality assessment and reporting followed Cochrane Collaboration Handbook and PRISMA guidelines. PROSPERO: CRD42022344104. Nine randomized controlled trials and three single-arm phase II trials were included, comprising 702 patients (702 patients for CV AE and 522 for perioperative complications). The neoadjuvant regimen was classified as monotherapy with ARSI (100 patients), combination therapy with ADT + ARSI (383 patients), or ADT + ARSI + ARSI (219 patients). The PI of TE within the perioperative interval was 4.2% (95% CI = 2.6%-6.6%, I2 = 0.0%, P = .65), and the PI for CV AE was 4.6% (95% CI = 3.1%-6.7%, I2 = 0.0%, P = .71). Seven deaths were reported, resulting in a PI of 2.2% (95% CI = 1.3%-3.8%, I2 = 0.0%, P = .99), of which two were considered treatment-related and occurred within the perioperative period. The PI of hypertension grade 3-5 was 7.3% (95% CI = 4.8%-11.0%, I2 = 38.8%, P = .04). CV and TE AE associated with intense neoadjuvant hormone therapy in patients with localized PC can occur in up to 4.6% of cases. Our data warns for further assessment of thrombotic risk and prophylactic anticoagulation in this setting.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists , Cardiovascular Diseases , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Prostatectomy , Prostatic Neoplasms , Thromboembolism , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Neoadjuvant Therapy/adverse effects , Thromboembolism/etiology , Thromboembolism/chemically induced , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Androgen Antagonists/adverse effects , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Androgen Antagonists/administration & dosage , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/chemically induced , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology
18.
Urol Oncol ; 42(9): 266-274, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38729866

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The influence of androgen suppression therapy (AST) on bladder cancer (BCa) remains controversial, as recent studies have not reached a consensus regarding the relationship between AST and the incidence or prognosis of BCa. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We perform an updated systematic review and meta-analysis utilizing the most recent evidence to investigate the potential influence of AST on the incidence and prognosis of BCa. A comprehensive literature search was performed on the PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases to include potentially eligible studies. Hazard ratios (HR) and odds ratios (OR) were used to calculate the incidence and prognosis of BCa. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 22 studies with 700,755 participants which investigated the impact of AST on the risk and prognosis of BCa. The pooled results revealed no significant relation between AST and a decreased incidence of BCa (OR: 0.92, 95%CI: 0.77-1.09, P = 0.342). Subgroup analysis reported that patients receiving 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) exhibited a significantly lower risk of BCa (OR: 0.83, 95%CI: 0.75-0.91, P < 0.001), while androgen deprivation therapy did not show a significant reduction (OR: 1.00, 95%CI: 0.46-2.16, P = 0.995). AST may also significantly improve the recurrence-free survival of patients with BCa (HR: 0.69, 95%CI: 0.50-0.95, P = 0.023). We also detected a significant improvement in OS among BCa patients who received 5-ARIs compared to those without 5-ARIs (HR: 0.82, 95%CI: 0.68-0.99, P = 0.037). CONCLUSION: No significant correlation was found between AST and a decreased BCa incidence, while 5-ARIs have demonstrated efficacy in reducing BCa occurrence. Moreover, patients who received AST demonstrated improved prognosis.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Humans , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Incidence , Prognosis , Male
19.
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol ; 20(6): 491-502, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38778707

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The therapeutic scenario of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) has dramatically changed in recent years, with the approval of new-generation Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors (ARSIs), in combination with the androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), which was the previous standard of care. Despite showing a similar clinical efficacy, ARSIs, all of which are administered orally, are different in terms of pharmacokinetic and drug-drug interactions (DDIs). AREAS COVERED: This review covers the main pharmacokinetic characteristics of ARSIs that have been approved for the first-line therapy of mHSPC patients, underlying the differences among these molecules and focusing on the known or possible interactions with other drugs. Full-text articles and abstracts were searched in PubMed. EXPERT OPINION: Since prostate cancer occurs mainly in older age, comorbidities and the consequent polypharmacy increase the DDI risk in mHSPC patients who are candidates for ARSI. Waiting for new therapeutic options, in the absence of direct comparisons, pharmacokinetic knowledge is essential to guide clinicians in prescribing ARSI in this setting.


Subject(s)
Androgen Receptor Antagonists , Drug Interactions , Neoplasm Metastasis , Prostatic Neoplasms , Signal Transduction , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/pharmacokinetics , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/administration & dosage , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Polypharmacy , Aged , Androgen Antagonists/administration & dosage , Androgen Antagonists/pharmacokinetics , Androgen Antagonists/pharmacology , Androgen Antagonists/adverse effects , Administration, Oral , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/pharmacology , Animals
20.
JAMA Oncol ; 10(6): 807-820, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722620

ABSTRACT

Importance: Metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer is currently an incurable disease. Despite a high response rate to androgen-deprivation therapy, most cases progress to castration-resistant disease, the terminal phase. This review provides a summary of the most recent evidence for current and emerging management strategies, including treatment intensification with combinations of therapies. It also provides recommendations on applying the evidence in clinical practice to encourage appropriate treatment to improve survival outcomes among patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Observations: Androgen-deprivation therapy is the backbone of treatment for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer; however, it is insufficient alone to provide sustained disease control and long-term survival. Addition of an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor and/or docetaxel significantly improves survival, as demonstrated by several international phase 3 randomized clinical trials. Triplet therapy composed of androgen-deprivation therapy plus an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor plus docetaxel has been shown to improve overall survival over androgen-deprivation therapy plus docetaxel. In the ARASENS trial (darolutamide), the hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.68 (95% CI, 0.57-0.80) in the overall population; 0.71 (95% CI, 0.59-0.85) and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.35-1.05) in patients with de novo and recurrent disease, respectively; 0.69 (95% CI, 0.57-0.82) and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.41-1.13) in patients with high-volume and low-volume disease, respectively; and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.58-0.86) and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.42-0.90) in patients with high-risk and low-risk disease, respectively. In the PEACE-1 trial (abiraterone acetate + prednisone), the HRs were 0.75 (95% CI, 0.59-0.95; all de novo) in the overall population and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.55-0.95) and immature in the high-volume and low-volume subgroups, respectively. In the ENZAMET trial (enzalutamide), the HRs were 0.82 (95% CI, 0.63-1.06) in the overall population; 0.73 (95% CI, 0.55-0.99) and 1.10 (95% CI, 0.65-1.86) in the de novo and recurrent subgroups, respectively; and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.66-1.17) and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.33-1.10) in the high-volume and low-volume subgroups. Combination regimens are generally well tolerated, with adverse effects dependent on the profiles of the component drugs. Conclusions and relevance: The findings of this review show compelling evidence from phase 3 randomized clinical trials in favor of initiating triplet combination therapy for patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer for the best overall survival. Patients who are eligible for chemotherapy should be offered androgen-deprivation therapy plus an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor plus docetaxel, particularly patients with high-volume, high-risk, or de novo metastatic disease.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Prostatic Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Treatment Outcome , Neoplasm Metastasis , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Docetaxel/therapeutic use , Docetaxel/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...