Enhancement of Chemotherapy Efficacy in Cervical Cancer via MAPK Pathway Inhibition by Osimertinib.

Addressing recurrent cervical cancer poses a substantial challenge. Osimertinib, an FDA-approved EGFR inhibitor, has emerged as a promising option. Our study examined its potential to enhance paclitaxel's efficacy against cervical cancer. Osimertinib effectively hindered cancer cell growth and induced apoptosis across multiple cell lines. Combined with paclitaxel, it exhibited synergy in suppressing cervical cancer cells. Importantly, osimertinib's inhibitory effect was EGFR-independent; it targeted Mnk phosphorylation, reducing eIF4E activity. In mice, the combined osimertinib-paclitaxel treatment surpassed individual drugs in inhibiting cancer growth. These preclinical findings suggest osimertinib's repurposing as a means to improve paclitaxel's effectiveness in cervical cancer treatment.

Real-World Analysis of Post-Progression Treatment Patterns and Outcomes for EGFR Mutation-Positive Patients Treated with First-Line Osimertinib.

Introduction: The use of osimertinib in the first-line (1L) setting is an effective treatment option for sensitizing EGFR-mutations (EGFRm+) and has significantly altered the standard of care practice for EGFRm+ disease in Canada. Unfortunately, acquired resistance to osimertinib is almost universal, and outcomes are disparate. Post-progression treatment patterns and the outcome of real-world Canadian EGFRm+ patients receiving 1L osimertinib were the focus of this retrospective review. Methods: The Glans-Look Lung Cancer Research database was used to identify and collect demographic, clinical, treatment, and outcome data on EGFRm+ patients who received 1L osimertinib in the Canadian province of Alberta between 2018 and 2022. Results: A total of 150 patients receiving 1L osimertinib were identified. In total, 86 developed progressive disease, with 56 (65%) continuing systemic therapy, 73% continuing osimertinib, and 27% switching to second-line (2L) systemic therapy. Patients were similar both in clinical characteristics at 1L osimertinib initiation and patterns of treatment failure at progression; those continuing 1L osimertinib post-progression had a longer time to progression (13.5 vs. 8.8 months, p = 0.05) and subsequent post-osimertinib initiation survival (34.7 vs. 22.8 months, p = 0.11). Conclusions: The continuation of osimertinib post-progression is an effective disease management strategy for select real-world EGFRm+ patients, providing continued clinical benefit, potentially due to different underlying disease pathogenesis.

A systematic review of second-generation FLT3 inhibitors for treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a complex disease with diverse mutations, including prevalent mutations in the FMS-like receptor tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) gene that lead to poor prognosis. Recent advancements have introduced FLT3 inhibitors that have improved outcomes for FLT3-mutated AML patients, however, questions remain on their application in complex conditions such as relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of second-generation FLT3 inhibitors in treating patients with R/R AML. METHODS: A systematic literature search of PubMed, MEDLINE, SCOPUS and Google Scholar databases was made to identify relevant studies up to January 30, 2024. This study was conducted following the guidelines of the PRISMA. RESULTS: The ADMIRAL trial revealed significantly improved overall survival and complete remission rates with gilteritinib compared to salvage chemotherapy, with manageable adverse effects. Ongoing research explores its potential in combination therapies, showing synergistic effects with venetoclax and promising outcomes in various clinical trials. The QuANTUM-R trial suggested longer overall survival with quizartinib compared to standard chemotherapy, although concerns were raised regarding trial design and cardiotoxicity. Ongoing research explores combination therapies involving quizartinib, such as doublet or triplet regimens with venetoclax, showing promising outcomes in FLT3-mutated AML patients. CONCLUSION: These targeted therapies offer promise for managing this subgroup of AML patients, but further research is needed to optimize their use. This study underscores the importance of personalized treatment based on genetic mutations in AML, paving the way for more effective and tailored approaches to combat the disease.

[Resistance to anti-EGFR through the successive and cumulative acquisition of two new oncogenic addictions: BRAF and ALK]. / Résistance aux anti-EGFR via l'acquisition successive et cumulée de deux nouvelles addictions oncogénique BRAF et ALK.

Targeted therapies are the standard first-line treatment for metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with certain molecular abnormalities. These abnormalities are particularly common in Southeast Asia and French Polynesia. A 51-year-old Tahitian female non-smoker was diagnosed in 2018 with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma harboring a p.L858R EGFR mutation. She received gefitinib as first-line treatment. Due to locoregional progression and the presence of a resistance mutation (p.T790M of EFGR), she received osimertinib as second-line treatment, after which chemotherapy was proposed as 3rd-line treatment. An additional biopsy detected not only the previously known EGFR mutation, but also a BRAF p.V600E mutation. Following disease progression during chemotherapy, the patient received targeted therapies combining dabrafenib, trametinib and osimertinib. Due to a dissociated response after four months of treatment, a 5th line of paclitaxel bevacizumab was initiated. Subsequent to additional progression and given the ALK rearrangement shown on the re-biopsy, 6th-line treatment with alectinib was proposed. As the response was once again dissociated, a final line was proposed before stopping active treatments due to their toxicity and overall deterioration in the patient's state of health. This exceptional case is characterized by resistance to anti-EGFR through the successive and cumulative acquisition of two new oncogene addictions. The authors underline the importance of re-biopsy at each progression, leading (if at all feasible) to yet around round of targeted therapy.

Concomitant osimertinib and antituberculosis therapy in an elderly patient with EGFR-mutated lung cancer and pulmonary tuberculosis: A case report.

The concurrent incidence of lung cancer and tuberculosis is expected to escalate due to the projected growth in the older population. Combination therapy with osimertinib and antituberculosis drugs has not been well-established. We report a case of successful treatment involving the concomitant administration of osimertinib and antituberculosis drugs in an older patient, an 89-year-old female, diagnosed with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant lung cancer and pulmonary tuberculosis. Accumulating evidence is warranted to develop an optimal treatment strategy for patients with lung cancer and tuberculosis.

Real-world osimertinib pretreatment experience in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor T790M mutation-positive locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

Osimertinib has demonstrated efficacy in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in clinical trials. However, real-world data on its effectiveness remain scarce. Taiwanese patients with T790M-positive locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC and progressive disease following treatment with at least one EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) were enrolled from the osimertinib early access program. Of the 419 patients (mean age, 63 years; female, 67%), 53% were heavily pretreated (≥ third-line [3L]), making osimertinib a fourth-line (4L) intervention. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.95-11.41); the 18-month PFS rate was 26.5%. The median overall survival (OS) was 19.0 months (95% CI: 16.30-20.95); the 24-month OS rate was 40.9%. The objective response rate was 32.46%, and the disease control rate was 86.38%. The median time to treatment discontinuation of osimertinib monotherapy was 11.9 months (95% CI: 10.49-13.11). Subgroup analyses of median PFS and OS in the chemotherapy combination group vs. the osimertinib monotherapy group yielded no difference. Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis, number of prior lines of therapy, and types of initial EGFR-TKIs did not significantly impact outcomes. The median PFS values were 9.0 (95% CI: 5.18-11.34) and 10.9 (95% CI: 9.18-11.90) months with and without CNS metastasis, respectively, and 10.8 (95% CI: 8.59-12.69), 13.6 (95% CI: 10.89-16.3), and 9.2 (95% CI: 7.8-10.62) months for second-line (2L), 3L, and ≥4L therapy, respectively. In patients who received osimertinib as 2L therapy, the median PFS values in response to prior afatinib, erlotinib and gefitinib treatment were 11.2 (95% CI: 4.85-4.79), 10.5 (95% CI: 8.59-20.26) and 8.7 (95% CI: 7.21-16.79) months, respectively. Overall, real-world data from Taiwan support the clinical benefits of osimertinib in EGFR T790M -positive NSCLC.

Design, synthesis, and antitumor activity evaluation of potent fourth-generation EGFR inhibitors for treatment of Osimertinib resistant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is one of the most studied drug targets for treating non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there are no approved inhibitors for the C797S resistance mutation caused by the third-generation EGFR inhibitor (Osimertinib). Therefore, the development of fourth-generation EGFR inhibitors is urgent. In this study, we clarified the structure-activity relationship of several synthesized compounds as fourth-generation inhibitors against human triple (Del19/T790M/C797S) mutation. Representative compound 52 showed potent inhibitory activity against EGFRL858R/T790M/C797S with an IC50 of 0.55 nM and significantly inhibited the proliferation of the Ba/F3 cell line harboring EGFRL858R/T790M/C797S with an IC50 of 43.28 nM. Moreover, 52 demonstrated good pharmacokinetic properties and excellent in vivo efficacy. Overall, the compound 52 can be considered a promising candidate for overcoming EGFR C797S-mediated mutations.

Ferritinophagy mediates adaptive resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer.

Osimertinib (Osi) is a widely used epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI). However, the emergence of resistance is inevitable, partly due to the gradual evolution of adaptive resistant cells during initial treatment. Here, we find that Osi treatment rapidly triggers adaptive resistance in tumor cells. Metabolomics analysis reveals a significant enhancement of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) in Osi adaptive-resistant cells. Mechanically, Osi treatment induces an elevation of NCOA4, a key protein of ferritinophagy, which maintains the synthesis of iron-sulfur cluster (ISC) proteins of electron transport chain and OXPHOS. Additionally, active ISC protein synthesis in adaptive-resistant cells significantly increases the sensitivity to copper ions. Combining Osi with elesclomol, a copper ion ionophore, significantly increases the efficacy of Osi, with no additional toxicity. Altogether, this study reveals the mechanisms of NCOA4-mediated ferritinophagy in Osi adaptive resistance and introduces a promising new therapy of combining copper ionophores to improve its initial efficacy.

Targeting pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 overcomes EGFR C797S mutation-driven osimertinib resistance in non-small cell lung cancer.

Osimertinib, a selective third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), effectively targets the EGFR T790M mutant in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the newly identified EGFR C797S mutation confers resistance to osimertinib. In this study, we explored the role of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 (PDK1) in osimertinib resistance. Patients exhibiting osimertinib resistance initially displayed elevated PDK1 expression. Osimertinib-resistant cell lines with the EGFR C797S mutation were established using A549, NCI-H292, PC-9, and NCI-H1975 NSCLC cells for both in vitro and in vivo investigations. These EGFR C797S mutant cells exhibited heightened phosphorylation of EGFR, leading to the activation of downstream oncogenic pathways. The EGFR C797S mutation appeared to increase PDK1-driven glycolysis through the EGFR/AKT/HIF-1α axis. Combining osimertinib with the PDK1 inhibitor leelamine helped successfully overcome osimertinib resistance in allograft models. CRISPR-mediated PDK1 knockout effectively inhibited tumor formation in xenograft models. Our study established a clear link between the EGFR C797S mutation and elevated PDK1 expression, opening new avenues for the discovery of targeted therapies and improving our understanding of the roles of EGFR mutations in cancer progression.

Real-World Data on Subsequent Therapy for First-Line Osimertinib-Induced Pneumonitis: Safety of EGFR-TKI Rechallenge (Osi-risk Study TORG-TG2101).

BACKGROUND: Although osimertinib is a promising therapeutic agent for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive lung cancer, the incidence of pneumonitis is particularly high among Japanese patients receiving the drug. Furthermore, the safety and efficacy of subsequent anticancer treatments, including EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) rechallenge, which are to be administered after pneumonitis recovery, remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the safety of EGFR-TKI rechallenge in patients who experienced first-line osimertinib-induced pneumonitis, with a primary focus on recurrent pneumonitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients with EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer who developed initial pneumonitis following first-line osimertinib treatment across 34 institutions in Japan between August 2018 and September 2020. RESULTS: Among the 124 patients included, 68 (54.8%) patients underwent EGFR-TKI rechallenge. The recurrence rate of pneumonitis following EGFR-TKI rechallenge was 27% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17-39) at 12 months. The cumulative incidence of recurrent pneumonitis was significantly higher in the osimertinib group than in the first- and second-generation EGFR-TKI (conventional EGFR-TKI) groups (hazard ratio [HR] 3.1; 95% CI 1.3-7.5; p = 0.013). Multivariate analysis revealed a significant association between EGFR-TKI type (osimertinib or conventional EGFR-TKI) and pneumonitis recurrence, regardless of severity or status of initial pneumonitis (HR 3.29; 95% CI 1.12-9.68; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Osimertinib rechallenge after initial pneumonitis was associated with significantly higher recurrence rates than conventional EGFR-TKI rechallenge.

Osimertinib plus local treatment for brain metastases versus osimertinib alone in patients with EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Osimertinib is a standard treatment for patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is highly effective for brain metastases (BMs). However, it is unclear whether local treatment (LT) for BMs prior to osimertinib administration improves survival in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. We aimed to reveal the survival benefit of upfront local treatment (LT) for BMs in patients treated with osimertinib. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included consecutive patients with EGFR mutation (19del or L858R)-positive NSCLC who had BMs before osimertinib initiation between August 2018 and October 2021. We compared overall survival (OS) and central nervous system progression-free survival (CNS-PFS) between patients who received upfront LT for BMs (the upfront LT group), and patients who received osimertinib only (the osimertinib-alone group). Inverse-probability treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was performed to adjust for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: Of the 121 patients analyzed, 57 and 64 patients had 19del and L858R, respectively. Forty-five and 76 patients were included in the upfront LT group and the osimertinib-alone groups, respectively. IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the OS of the upfront LT group was significantly longer than that of the osimertinib-alone group (median, 95 % confidence intervals [95 %CI]: Not reached [NR], NR-NR vs. 31.2, 21.7-33.2; p = 0.021). The hazard ratio (HR) for OS and CNS-PFS was 0.37 (95 %CI, 0.16-0.87) and 0.36 (95 %CI, 0.15-0.87), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The OS and CNS-PFS of patients who received upfront LT for BMs followed by osimertinib were significantly longer than those of patients who received osimertinib alone. Upfront LT for BMs may be beneficial in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with osimertinib.

Early Metabolic Response by PET Predicts Sensitivity to Next-Line Targeted Therapy in EGFR-Mutated Lung Cancer with Unknown Mechanism of Acquired Resistance.

Targeted therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has established the precision oncology paradigm in lung cancer. Most patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer respond but eventually acquire resistance. Methods: Patients exhibiting the EGFR p.T790M resistance biomarker benefit from sequenced targeted therapy with osimertinib. We hypothesized that metabolic response as detected by 18F-FDG PET after short-course osimertinib identifies additional patients susceptible to sequenced therapy. Results: Fourteen patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer and resistance to first- or second-generation EGFR TKI testing negatively for EGFR p.T790M were enrolled in a phase II study. Five patients (36%) achieved a metabolic 18F-FDG PET response and continued osimertinib. In those, the median duration of treatment was not reached (95% CI, 24 mo to not estimable), median progression-free survival was 18.7 mo (95% CI, 14.6 mo to not estimable), and median overall survival was 41.5 mo. Conclusion: Connecting theranostic osimertinib treatment with early metabolic response assessment by PET enables early identification of patients with unknown mechanisms of TKI resistance who derive dramatic clinical benefit from sequenced osimertinib. This defines a novel paradigm for personalization of targeted therapies in patients with lung cancer dependent on a tractable driver oncogene.

Clinical outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR Exon20 in-frame insertions in the near-loop and far-loop: Results from LC-SCRUM-Asia.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we explored the clinical outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR Exon20 in-frame insertions (Exon20ins), and the impact of the location of Exon20ins on these clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The efficacies of current systemic therapies in NSCLC patients harboring Exon20ins were investigated using a large-scale clinico-genomic database of LC-SCRUM-Asia, and compared with that of amivantamab in the CHRYSALIS trial. RESULTS: Of the 11,397 patients enrolled in LC-SCRUM-Asia, Exon20ins were detected in 189 patients (1.7 %). Treatment with classical EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (classical TKIs) was associated with a significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) in NSCLC patients with Exon20ins as compared with Exon19 deletions and L858R. Post platinum-based chemotherapy, classical TKIs and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were associated with a shorter PFS than with docetaxel in patients with Exon20ins (HR [95 % CI]; TKIs vs docetaxel, 2.16 [1.35-3.46]; ICIs vs docetaxel, 1.49 [1.21-1.84]). Patients treated with amivantamab in the CHRYSALIS trial showed a risk reduction in PFS and overall survival as compared with LC-SCRUM-Asia patients treated with docetaxel, classical TKIs, or ICIs. Among the 189 patients, Exon20ins were classified as near-loop or far-loop insertions in 115 (61 %) and 56 (30 %) patients, respectively. Treatment with osimertinib was associated with a longer PFS in patients with Exon20ins in near-loop as compared with far-loop (median, 5.6 vs. 2.0 months; HR [95 % CI], 0.22 [0.07-0.64]). CONCLUSIONS: After platinum-based chemotherapy, classical TKIs and ICIs are less effective in NSCLC patients with Exon20ins, and amivantamab may be a promising targeted therapy. There is a possibility that the location of Exon20ins has an impact on the efficacy of TKIs.

Cadherin-11 targeted cell-specific liposomes enabled skin fibrosis treatment by inducing apoptosis.

Continuous and aberrant activation of myofibroblasts is the hallmark of pathological fibrosis (e.g., abnormal wound healing). The deposition of excessive extracellular matrix (ECM) components alters or increases the stiffness of tissue and primarily accounts for multiple organ dysfunctions. Among various proteins, Cadherin-11 (CDH11) has been reported to be overexpressed on myofibroblasts in fibrotic tissues. Anti-apoptotic proteins such as (B cell lymphoma-2) (BCL-2) are also upregulated on myofibroblasts. Therefore, we hypothesize that CDH11 could be a targeted domain for cell-specific drug delivery and targeted inhibition of BCL-2 to ameliorate the development of fibrosis in the skin. To prove our hypothesis, we have developed liposomes (LPS) conjugated with CDH11 neutralizing antibody (antiCDH11) to target cell surface CDH11 and loaded these LPS with a BCL-2 inhibitor, Navitoclax (NAVI), to induce apoptosis of CDH11 expressing fibroblasts. The developed LPS were evaluated for physicochemical characterization, stability, in vitro therapeutic efficacy using dermal fibroblasts, and in vivo therapeutic efficacy in bleomycin-induced skin fibrosis model in mice. The findings from in vitro and in vivo studies confirmed that selectivity of LPS was improved towards CDH11 expressing myofibroblasts, thereby improving therapeutic efficacy with no indication of adverse effects. Hence, this novel research work represents a versatile LPS strategy that exhibits promising potential for treating skin fibrosis.

CircMYBL1 suppressed acquired resistance to osimertinib in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) play an important role in the development of acquired resistance to many anticancer drugs. We developed the Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) cell lines with acquired resistance to osimertinib, a third-generation of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), and evaluated the different expression profiles of circRNAs in osimertinib-sensitive and -resistant NSCLC cell lines using RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq). The expression of selected differentially expressed circRNAs was verified using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) in paired osimertinib-sensitive and -resistant NSCLC cell lines, and in plasma samples of osimertinib-sensitive and -resistant NSCLC patients. We found that circMYBL1(has_circ_0136924) was downregulated after acquired resistance to osimertinib, inhibiting circMYBL1 expression facilitated the proliferation, migration, and invasion in osimertinib-sensitive NSCLC cells. CircMYBL1 may be a novel molecular biomarker and therapeutic target for osimertinib-resistant NSCLC.

Co-occurring EGFR p.E709X Mutation Mediates Primary Resistance to the Third-Generation EGFR-TKIs in EGFR p.G719X-Mutant Patients with Advanced NSCLC.

PURPOSE: The current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend afatinib or osimertinib as the preferred first-line treatment strategy for patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR p.G719X mutation. However, in the absence of head-to-head trials comparing afatinib with osimertinib in EGFR p.G719X-mutant patients, it is unclear which regimen is the preferred treatment option. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A large cohort of 4,228 treatment-naïve patients with lung cancer who underwent targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing was screened for EGFR p.G719X mutation. A multicenter cohort involving 68 EGFR p.G719X-mutant patients with advanced NSCLC and NGS profiling was retrospectively enrolled to evaluate clinical responses to afatinib (n = 37) and the third-generation EGFR-TKIs (n = 31). Ba/F3 cells stably expressing the EGFR p.G719A mutation were created to investigate the response to EGFR-TKIs in vitro. RESULTS: Concurrent EGFR p.E709X mutations, being the most frequent co-occurring EGFR mutation in EGFR p.G719X-mutant NSCLC (∼30%), exerted a detrimental effect on outcomes in patients treated with third-generation EGFR-TKI [G719X/E709X vs. G719X; objective response rate (ORR): 0.00% vs. 47.62%, P < 0.001; mPFS: 7.18 vs. 14.2 months, P = 0.04, respectively]. Conversely, no significant difference was found in the treatment efficacy of afatinib between EGFR p.G719X/E709X and EGFR p.G719X patients (G719X/E709X vs. G719X; ORR: 71.43% vs. 56.67%, P = 0.99; mPFS: 14.7 vs. 15.8 months, P = 0.69, respectively). In vitro experiments elucidated a resistant drug sensitivity and poor inhibition of EGFR phosphorylation in Ba/F3 cells expressing EGFR p.G719A/E709K mutation upon the third-generation EGFR-TKI treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Co-occurring EGFR p.E709X mutation mediated primary resistance to the third-generation EGFR-TKIs in EGFR p.G719X-mutant patients but remained sensitive to afatinib. A personalized treatment strategy should be undertaken based on the coexisting EGFR p.E709X mutation status.

Combination p53 activation and BCL-xL/BCL-2 inhibition as a therapeutic strategy in high-risk and relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Due to the rarity of TP53 mutations in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), p53 re-activation by antagonism of the p53-MDM2 interaction represents a potential therapeutic strategy for the majority of ALL. Here, we demonstrate the potent antileukemic activity of the MDM2 antagonist idasanutlin in high-risk and relapsed ex vivo coculture models of TP53 wildtype ALL (n = 40). Insufficient clinical responses to monotherapy MDM2 inhibitors in other cancers prompted us to explore optimal drugs for combination therapy. Utilizing high-throughput combination screening of 1971 FDA-approved and clinically advanced compounds, we identified BCL-xL/BCL-2 inhibitor navitoclax as the most promising idasanutlin combination partner. The idasanutlin-navitoclax combination was synergistically lethal to prognostically-poor, primary-derived and primary patient blasts in ex vivo coculture, and reduced leukemia burden in two very high-risk ALL xenograft models at drug concentrations safely attained in patients; in fact, the navitoclax plasma concentrations were equivalent to those attained in contemporary "low-dose" navitoclax clinical trials. We demonstrate a preferential engagement of cell death over G1 cell cycle arrest, mechanistically implicating MCL-1-binding pro-apoptotic sensitizer NOXA. The proposed combination of two clinical-stage compounds independently under clinical evaluation for ALL is of high clinical relevance and warrants consideration for the treatment of patients with high-risk and relapsed ALL.