The optimal antibiotic treatment duration for community-acquired pneumonia in adults diagnosed in general practice in Denmark (CAP-D): an open-label, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Use of antibiotics is the main driver of antimicrobial resistance which is considered one of the biggest threats to human health. In Denmark, most antibiotics are prescribed in general practice. Acute lower respiratory tract infections, including community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), are among the most frequent indications for antibiotic prescribing. Phenoxymethylpenicillin is established as first-line treatment in general practice in Denmark. However, the treatment duration with phenoxymethylpenicillin is mostly based on traditions. Both 5 and 7 days of treatment is recommended in Danish guidelines, and when asking the general practitioners about what treatment duration, they prescribe the variation is even bigger. Several hospital-based studies have proven short course (≤ 6 days) antibiotic treatment non-inferior to long course (≥ 7 days) treatment of CAP. No evidence exists on the optimal treatment duration for CAP in non-hospitalised patients. This randomised controlled trial aim to investigate the optimal treatment duration with phenoxymethylpenicillin for CAP in adults diagnosed in general practice in Denmark. METHODS: This is an open-label, pragmatic, randomised controlled, five-arm DURATIONS trial. Participants will be recruited from at least 24 general practices in Denmark. Eligible participants are adults, with no pre-existing lung disease, presenting with symptoms of CAP, and in whom the general practitioner finds it relevant to treat with antibiotics. The study will compare treatment with phenoxymethylpenicillin 1.2 MIE q.i.d. in 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days. DISCUSSION: This study will provide evidence for the optimal antibiotic treatment duration of CAP in general practice and inform future guidelines on CAP in all countries using phenoxymethylpenicillin for the treatment of acute respiratory tract infections in adults. The results of this study might also be used to guide treatment recommendations in other countries using phenoxymethylpenicillin. Moreover, a (potential) reduction in antibiotic use might lower the development of antimicrobial resistance, increase patient treatment adherence, reduce risks of adverse events, and lower the economical exp TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06295120. Registered 28 February 2024.  The Scientific Ethics Committee for the North Denmark Region: N-20230039.

Orbital Complication in the Setting of Cocaine Use: A Case Report and Review of Literature.

Orbital cellulitis is a common ophthalmologic consultation and has numerous risk factors; however, one that is seldomly encountered is chronic cocaine use. We describe a case of a 63-year-old man with a history of HIV and cocaine use who presented with OD pain, proptosis, and blurred vision. CT imaging revealed extensive erosions throughout the nasal septum, bilateral turbinates, ethmoid sinuses, and loss of the right medial orbital wall. The patient was treated empirically with broad-spectrum antibiotics, and a nasal biopsy and culture grew Staphylococcus aureus. After treatment with IV antibiotics, the patient's visual acuity returned to baseline with resolution of extraocular motility limitations. Although nasal erosions are a well-described sequela of cocaine use, full-thickness osseous defects of the orbital wall are rare and represent late-stage complications of cocaine-induced destructive midline lesions. Orbital cellulitis is a very rare complication in the setting of cocaine-induced destructive midline lesions. Clinicians should be aware of the link between cocaine use, rhino-orbital abnormalities, and orbital cellulitis.

Long-term antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of rheumatic fever recurrence and progression to rheumatic heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatic fever is a non-suppurative, inflammatory sequela of group A Streptococcus pharyngitis that can occur at two to four weeks after infection. Following an episode of rheumatic fever, there is a risk of developing rheumatic heart disease (RHD) later in life that carries significant risk of morbidity and mortality. RHD remains the largest global cause of cardiovascular disease in the young (age < 25 years). The historical literature provides inconclusive evidence that antibiotic prophylaxis is beneficial in reducing the risk of recurrence of rheumatic fever and development of RHD. Antibiotics are thought to work by reducing the carriage of group A Streptococcus and thus reducing the risk of infection. This review was commissioned by the World Health Organization (WHO) for an upcoming guideline. OBJECTIVES: 1. To assess the effects of long-term antibiotics versus no antibiotics (control) for secondary prevention of rheumatic fever recurrence and associated sequelae in people with previous rheumatic fever or RHD. 2. To assess the effects of long-term intramuscular penicillin versus long-term oral antibiotics for secondary prevention of rheumatic fever recurrence and associated sequelae in people with previous rheumatic fever or RHD. SEARCH METHODS: We systematically searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science, clinical trial registers, ISRCTN.com and reference lists without restrictions on language or date up to 10 March 2024. SELECTION CRITERIA: We sought randomised controlled trials or quasi-randomised trials, described in any language, including participants with previous rheumatic fever and/or RHD of any age, based in community or hospital settings. Studies were included if they compared firstly antibiotic prophylaxis with no antibiotic prophylaxis, and, secondly, intramuscular penicillin prophylaxis versus oral antibiotic prophylaxis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standardised methodological, Cochrane-endorsed procedures and performed meta-analyses with risk ratios (RR) and Peto odds ratios (Peto OR). Our primary outcomes were recurrence of rheumatic fever, progression or severity of RHD and cardiac complications. Our secondary outcomes were obstetric complications (maternal and foetal events), mortality, treatment adherence, adverse events and acceptability to participants. We performed comprehensive assessments of risk of bias and certainty of evidence, applying the GRADE methodology. MAIN RESULTS: We included 11 studies (seven RCTs and four quasi-randomised trials) including 3951 participants. The majority of the included studies were conducted in the USA, UK and Canada during the 1950s to 1960s. Most participants with previous rheumatic fever had been diagnosed using the modified Jones criteria (mJC) (four studies), were an average of 12.3 years of age and 50.6% male. We assessed the majority of the included studies to be at high risk of bias, predominantly relating to blinding and attrition bias. Comparison one: antibiotics versus no antibiotics Pooled meta-analysis of six RCTs provides moderate-certainty evidence that antibiotics overall (oral or intramuscular) probably reduce the risk of recurrence of rheumatic fever substantially (0.7% versus 1.7%, respectively) (risk ratio (RR) 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22 to 0.69; 1721 participants). People with early or mild RHD likely have the greatest capacity to benefit from intramuscular antibiotic prophylaxis (8.1%) compared to no antibiotics (0.7%) (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.29; 1 study, 818 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Antibiotics may not affect mortality in people with late-stage RHD (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.94; 1 study, 994 participants; low-certainty evidence). Antibiotics may not affect the risk of anaphylaxis (Peto odds ratio (OR) 7.39, 95% CI 0.15 to 372; 1 study, 818 participants; low-certainty evidence) or sciatic nerve injury (Peto OR 7.39, 95% CI 0.15 to 372; 1 study, 818 participants; low-certainty evidence) compared with no antibiotics, but probably have an increased risk of hypersensitivity reactions (RR 137, 8.51 to 2210; 2 studies, 894 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and local reactions (RR 29, 1.74 to 485; 1 study, 818 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Comparison two: intramuscular antibiotics versus oral antibiotics Pooled analysis of two RCTs showed that prophylactic intramuscular benzathine benzylpenicillin likely reduces recurrence of rheumatic fever substantially when compared to oral antibiotics (0.1% versus 1%, respectively) (RR 0.07, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.26; 395 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Furthermore, it is unclear whether intramuscular benzyl penicillin is superior to oral antibiotics in reducing the risk of mortality in the context of RHD (Peto OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.01 to 4.12; 1 study, 431 participants; very low-certainty evidence). There were no data available on progression of latent RHD or adverse events including anaphylaxis, sciatic nerve injury, delayed hypersensitivity/allergic reactions and local reactions to injection. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review provides evidence that antibiotic prophylaxis likely reduces the risk of recurrence of rheumatic fever compared to no antibiotics, and that intramuscular benzathine benzylpenicillin is probably superior to oral antibiotics (approximately 10 times better). Moreover, intramuscular benzathine benzylpenicillin likely reduces the risk of progression of latent RHD. Evidence is scarce, but antibiotics compared with no antibiotics may not affect the risk of anaphylaxis or sciatic nerve injury, but probably carry an increased risk of hypersensitivity reactions and local reactions. Antibiotics may not affect all-cause mortality in late-stage RHD compared to no antibiotics. There is no evidence available to comment on the effect of intramuscular penicillin over oral antibiotics for progression of latent RHD and adverse events, and little evidence for all-cause mortality. It is important to interpret these findings in the context of major limitations, including the following: the vast majority of the included studies were conducted more than 50 years ago, many before contemporary echocardiographic studies; methodology was often at high risk of bias; outdated treatments were used; only one study was in latent RHD; and there are concerns regarding generalisability to low socioeconomic regions. This underlines the need for ongoing research to understand who benefits most from prophylaxis.

Allergies to antibiotics among US women with uncomplicated urinary tract infection.

Uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTI) are generally treated empirically with antibiotics. However, antibiotic allergies limit the available oral treatment options for some patients. We assessed the proportion of self-reported antibiotic allergies among US women with uUTI. We performed a cross-sectional survey of US women (≥18 years) with a self-reported uUTI in the previous 60 days and an oral antibiotic prescription. Participants completed an online questionnaire about their most recent uUTI episode. Descriptive self-reported allergy data were stratified into subgroups by whether the participant had recurrent UTI (≥2 uUTIs in the past 6 months or ≥3 uUTIs in past 12 months, including the index episode), the number of different antibiotics given for the index episode (1, 2, ≥3), and whether the treatment was clinically aligned according to Infectious Diseases Society of America uUTI guidelines. Overall, 375 participants completed the questionnaire. The most commonly prescribed antibiotics were trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT; 38.7%), ciprofloxacin (22.7%), and nitrofurantoin (18.9%). Most participants (62.7%) received only 1 antibiotic for their uUTI, and most (56.5%) were classified as having a non-recurrent uUTI. No antibiotic allergies were reported for most participants (69.3%), with 24.0% reporting 1 antibiotic allergy and 6.7% reporting ≥2 antibiotic allergies. Allergies to ≥2 antibiotic types were more common among participants classified as having recurrent uUTI, or who used multiple antibiotics to treat their uUTI. The most common allergy was to SXT (15.7%), followed by amoxicillin-clavulanate (8.3%) and ciprofloxacin (5.3%). Similar allergy trends were seen across subgroups, except higher rates of ciprofloxacin allergy were seen in participants given multiple antibiotics. Antibiotic allergies were relatively frequent in this uUTI cohort and the most common allergy was to SXT, which was the most prescribed antibiotic. Allergies to antibiotics reduce the available treatment options for uUTI in some patients.

Evaluation of the rational prescription of linezolid, the prevalence of thrombocytopenia and major drug interactions in patients with cardiovascular diseases: are there any cautions?

The present study evaluated the rational prescription of linezolid, the prevalence of thrombocytopenia, and major drug interactions in patients with cardiovascular diseases. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study on linezolid-treated patients at Shahid Chamran Heart Hospital in Isfahan from March 21, 2021, to March 20, 2022. Our research involved 132 patients who received linezolid. We reported 43.18% of linezolid prescriptions as irrational. Linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia is more common than previous studies, with a prevalence of 47.9%. We found a significant relationship between thrombocytopenia and the concomitant use of aspirin. The duration of treatment was identified as predicting factor for linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia. Moreover, the prevalence of interactions in the X and D categories was determined. Serotonergic and catecholamine medications were associated with 56.1% and 47.7% medication interactions, respectively. Our study found a high prevalence of linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia among patients with cardiovascular diseases. Based on this study, physicians should focus more closely on prescribing linezolid to patients with cardiovascular diseases. In addition to following rational antibiotic use, this susceptible group is also at an elevated risk of side effects (thrombocytopenia) and medication interactions.

Effectiveness and safety of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam administered in continuous infusion through elastomeric pumps in OPAT regimen: a case series.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to present real-life data on the use, effectiveness, and safety of administering Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (C/T) through elastomeric pumps (EP) in the outpatient setting. METHODS: This case series study was conducted from January 2022 to July 2023 in a large University Hospital in Rome, Italy. Patients receiving continuous infusion of C/T via EP were included up to a follow-up period of 90 days after the end of antibiotic therapy. The primary endpoint was the infection's clinical cure rate. Secondary endpoints were adverse events attributable to continuous home infusion of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam via elastomeric pumps. RESULTS: Seven patients received C/T continuously infused via EP and were included in the final analysis. Three patients suffered from prosthetic joint infection (n = 3/7; 43%), two patients from osteomyelitis (n = 2/7; 29%), one patient from otomastoiditis (n = 1/7; 15%) and one from pneumonia (n = 1/7; 15%). All infection were sustained by P. aeruginosa. Five strains had MDR-type susceptibility profiles (n = 5/7; 71%) and two of these were DTR (n = 2/7; 29%). The infection cure rate reached 86% (n = 6/7). Two patients reported a complication related to the vascular catheter for drug infusion (n = 2/7; 29%). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous infusion of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam by elastomeric pumps has been shown to be safe and effective in practice representing a viable option of intravenous treatment in outpatient setting for infection sustained by P. aeruginosa especially for multidrug-resistant strains.

"What if the patient has a severe reaction, and it is my fault?" A qualitative study exploring factors for sustainable implementation of penicillin allergy delabelling.

BACKGROUND: Penicillin allergy delabelling (PAD), the process of evaluating penicillin allergy labels, is a key target in antibiotic stewardship, but uptake of the procedure outside clinical studies is limited. We aimed to explore factors that need to be addressed to sustainably implement a clinical pathway for PAD. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews with focus groups consisting of a purposive sample of twenty-five nurses and physicians working in four different hospitals in Western Norway. Systematic text condensation was applied for analysis. RESULTS: Psychological safety was reported as crucial for clinicians to perform PAD. A narrative of uncertainty and anticipated negative outcomes were negatively associated with PAD performance. Education, guidelines, and colleague- and leadership support could together create psychological safety and empower health personnel to perform PAD. Key factors for sustainable implementation of PAD were facilitating the informant's profound motivation for providing optimal health care and for reducing antimicrobial resistance. Informants were motivated by the prospect of a simplified PAD procedure. We identified three main needs for implementation of PAD: (1) creating psychological safety; (2) utilising clinicians' inherent motivation and (3) optimal organisational structures. CONCLUSION: A planned implementation of PAD must acknowledge clinicians' need for psychological safety and aid reassurance through training, leadership, and guidelines. To implement PAD as an everyday practice it must be minimally disruptive and provide a contextually adaptive logistic chain. Also, the clinician's motivation for providing the best possible healthcare should be utilised to aid implementation. The results of this study will aid sustainable implementation of PAD in Norway. ETHICS: The study was approved by the Western Norway Regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics (Study No:199210).

Efficacy and safety of first- and second-line antibiotics for cellulitis and erysipelas: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

This study systematically evaluated and ranked the efficacy of first- and second-line antibiotics antibiotic options for the clinical management of cellulitis and erysipelas through a network meta-analysis approach. From inception to July 04, 2024, a search for relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was carried out using several databases. Antibiotics including azithromycin, cefaclor, cephalexin, cloxacillin, erythromycin, cephalexin plus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, cephalexin plus placebo, flucloxacillin, clindamycin, ceftriaxone, penicillin, roxithromycin, and pristinamycin were assessed regarding cure rate, the eradication of baseline pathogens, diarrhea or vomiting, and rash. In total, 10 RCTs with 1,936 cellulitis or erysipelas patients were eligible for inclusion. There were no significant differences in the cure rates for cellulitis among the antibiotics analysed, with cefaclor demonstrating the most favorable profile for curative outcomes. In terms of side effects, ceftriaxone was identified as the least likely to induce diarrhea or vomiting. For erysipelas, pristinamycin showed the most promising results in achieving cure rates. Although a comparison of the three antibiotics revealed no significant differences in rash as a side effect in erysipelas, pristinamycin was observed to carry the highest risk for rash. Our findings indicate no significant differences in cure rates among antibiotics for cellulitis. However, ceftriaxone had the fewest gastrointestinal side effects. Pristinamycin showed the highest cure rates for erysipelas but with a higher risk of rash. Future research should focus on optimizing antibiotic selection for cellulitis and erysipelas.

Evaluation of efficacy and safety of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus LRa05 in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Aim: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus LRa05 supplementation in enhancing Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication rate and alleviating the gastrointestinal side effects associated with bismuth quadruple therapy. Methods: H. pylori-positive patients were randomized to receive levofloxacin-based bismuth quadruple therapy combined either probiotic LRa05 or a placebo for two weeks, followed by LRa05 (1 × 1010 CFU) or maltodextrin for the next two weeks. H. pylori infection was detected by 13C breath test pre- and post-treatment. Blood and stool samples were collected at week 0 and week 4 for routine and biochemical analysis, and serum inflammatory markers. Gastrointestinal symptoms were evaluated using the gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS). Intestinal microbiota was analyzed using 16S rRNA sequencing. The research was listed under the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300072220), and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Results: The LRa05 group exhibited a trend toward higher H. pylori eradication rates (86.11%) compared to the placebo group (82.86%), though the difference was not statistically significant. Significant reductions in neutrophil count, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, pepsinogen I, interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) (p < 0.05) suggest that LRa05 supplementation may mitigate inflammation, enhance liver function, and potential aid in early cancer prevention. GSRS symptom scores showed that LRa05 alleviated abdominal pain, acid reflux, bloating, and diarrhea, enhancing patient compliance. Furthermore, 16S rRNA sequencing showed that LRa05 countered the antibiotic-induced disruption of gut microbiota diversity, primarily by increasing beneficial bacteria. Conclusion: Although LRa05 did not significantly improve the success rate of H. pylori eradication therapy, it has the potential to improve liver function and reduced levels of inflammatory markers such as IL-6 and TNF-α in the body, regulating the inflammatory response. In addition, it played a positive role in alleviating the adverse symptoms and gut microbiota disturbances caused by eradication therapy, providing a possible way to improve the overall health of patients and demonstrating promising clinical potential. Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2300072220.

The Combination of Exercise and Konjac Glucomannan More Effectively Prevents Antibiotics-Induced Dysbiosis in Mice Compared with Singular Intervention.

Our previous studies have demonstrated that konjac glucomannan (KGM) can prevent dysbiosis induced by antibiotics. While exercise may also impact the gut microbiome, there are limited studies reporting its protective effect on antibiotic-induced dysbiosis. Therefore, this study investigated the preventive and regulatory effects of a combination of 6-week exercise and KGM intervention on antibiotic-induced dysbiosis in C57BL/6J mice compared with a single intervention. The results showed that combined exercise and KGM intervention could restore the changes in the relative abundance of Bacteroides (3.73% with CTL versus 14.23% with ATBX versus 4.46% with EK) and Prevotellaceae_Prevotella (0.33% with CTL versus 0.00% with ATBX versus 0.30% with EK) induced by antibiotics (p < 0.05), and minimized the Bray-Curtis distance induced by antibiotics (0.55 with CTL versus 0.81 with ATBX versus 0.80 with EXC versus 0.83 with KGM versus 0.75 with EK). Compared with the combined intervention, exercise intervention also produced a certain level of recovery effects; the relative abundance of Rikenellaceae (1.96% with CTL versus 0.09% with ATBX versus 0.49% with EXC) was restored, while KGM supplementation showed the best preventive effect. In addition, the combination of exercise and KGM significantly enriched microbial purine metabolic pathways (p < 0.05). These findings indicate that combining exercise with KGM could be a promising approach to reducing the side effects of antibiotics on the gut microbiome.

Hot Dab Associated Pneumonitis - a case report.

BACKGROUND: Dabbing is recently getting popular among young adults. It is a new method of using the most active form of marijuana where large amounts of concentrated tetrahydrocannabinol are inhaled. Tetrahydrocannabinol is associated with a feeling of 'High' which makes the user feel joyous and relaxed. With increasing use of such techniques, dabbing becomes an important differential for evaluation of acute respiratory failure with pneumonitis especially in the adult population. CASE PRESENTATION: A Fifty-one years old Caucasian man presented to the hospital with chest pressure and shortness of breath. The patient was noted to be hypoxic, desaturating down to 82-83% on nasal cannula oxygen. Imaging revealed bilateral lung infiltrates. Patient was started on high flow oxygen, broad spectrum antibiotics and intravenous corticosteroids. The patient gradually improved and was able to come off oxygen completely. He was discharged home on prednisone taper. CONCLUSIONS: Dabbing is a newer technique which has been gaining popularity for marijuana usage. With the legalization of marijuana, newer techniques are getting popular. Our case report emphasizes the importance of keeping dabbing as a differential when a patient presents with respiratory failure and has concerns for pneumonitis. Patients might not reveal until specifically asked about their practices.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Meropenem-Vaborbactam versus Best-Available Therapy in Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections.

Antimicrobial resistance is increasingly concerning, causing millions of deaths and a high cost burden. Given that carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales are particularly concerning due to their ability to develop structural modifications and produce antibiotic-degrading enzymes, leading to high resistance levels, we sought to summarize the available data on the efficacy and safety regarding the combination of meropenem-vaborbactam (MV) versus the best available therapy (BAT). Articles related to our objective were searched in the PubMed and Scopus databases inception to July 2024. To assess the quality of the studies, we used the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, RoB2. The outcomes were pooled as a risk ratio (RR) and a 95% confidence interval (95%CI). A total of four published studies were involved: one retrospective cohort study and three phase 3 trials, including 432 patients treated with MV and 426 patients treated with BAT (mono/combination therapy with polymyxins, carbapenems, aminoglycosides, colistin, and tigecycline; or ceftazidime-avibactam; or piperacillin-tazobactam). No significant difference in the clinical response rate was observed between MV and the comparators at the TOC (RR = 1.29, 95%CI [0.92, 1.80], p = 0.14) and EOT (RR = 1.66, 95%CI [0.58, 4.76], p = 0.34) visits. MV was associated with a similar microbiological response as the comparators at TOC (RR = 1.63, 95%CI [0.85, 3.11], p = 0.14) and EOT assessment (RR = 1.16, 95%CI [0.88, 1.54], p = 0.14). In the pooled analysis of the four studies, 28-day all-cause mortality was lower for MV than the control groups (RR = 0.47, 95%CI [0.24, 0.92], p = 0.03). MV was associated with a similar risk of adverse events (AEs) as comparators (RR = 0.79, 95%CI [0.53, 1.17], p = 0.23). Additionally, MV was associated with fewer renal-related AEs than the comparators (RR = 0.32, 95%CI [0.15, 0.66], p = 0.002). MV was associated with a similar risk of treatment discontinuation due to AEs (RR = 0.76, 95%CI [0.38, 1.49], p = 0.42) or drug-related AEs (RR = 0.56, 95%CI [0.28, 1.10], p = 0.09) as the comparators. In conclusion, MV presents a promising therapeutic option for treating CRE infections, demonstrating similar clinical and microbiological responses as other comparators, with potential advantages in mortality outcomes and renal-related AEs.

When anaphylactic shock meets epinephrine and blood lactate increases: A case report.

RATIONALE: Anaphylactic shock, a severe and rapid systemic allergic reaction, poses significant treatment challenges. Epinephrine, the first-line treatment, effectively reverses symptoms but can complicate the clinical picture by elevating lactate levels, blurring the distinction between shock-induced hypoperfusion and drug-induced metabolic effects. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 26-year-old female presented with anaphylactic shock following an antibiotic infusion, experiencing chest tightness, hypotension, and pulmonary edema, without significant past medical history apart from a noted allergy to fish and shrimp. DIAGNOSES: Anaphylaxis was diagnosed based on clinical presentation and supported by imaging that revealed pulmonary edema, despite normal troponin levels and electrocardiogram. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment included 0.5 mg of intramuscular epinephrine and 5 mg of intravenous dexamethasone, with subsequent intubation and mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit. An intravenous epinephrine infusion was also administered for hemodynamic support. OUTCOMES: While epinephrine resolved the pulmonary edema and stabilized circulation, it led to a significant, albeit transient, increase in lactate levels, which normalized following discontinuation of epinephrine, indicating the metabolic effect of the drug rather than ongoing tissue hypoperfusion. LESSONS: This case illustrates the importance of recognizing epinephrine-induced lactate elevation in anaphylactic shock, necessitating a nuanced interpretation of lactate dynamics. Clinicians must differentiate between lactate elevations due to tissue hypoperfusion and those arising from epinephrine's pharmacologic effects to optimize patient care.

[Allergic contact dermatitis due to Furacin®]. / Allergic contact dermatitis due to Furacin®.

BACKGROUND: Allergic sensitization to topical antimicrobial treatments is a well-known problem. Furacin® is one of the most widely used in our environment. It contains 0.2% nitrofurazone and polyethylene glycol (PEG) as a vehicle. CASE REPORT: 57-year-old male with no history of interest. He presented skin rash, blisters, and serous exudate 2-3 days after starting treatment with Furacin® (applied to an infected skin wound). Epicutaneous tests were performed with a true test battery, nitrofurantoin 1% in petrolatum, PEG15000 and 4000 1% in petrolatum, pure PEG 400, PEG monomethyl ether 350 1% in water. Positive result at 96 hours for nitrofurantoin. CONCLUSION: Nitrofurazone is widely used as a topical antibiotic because of its bactericidal spectrum. It (including its excipients) should be considered in case of adverse reactions after application.

ANTECEDENTES: La sensibilización o alergia a medicamentos antimicrobianos tópicos es un problema conocido. Furacin® representa uno de los fármacos más prescritos en nuestro medio; sus principios activos son: nitrofurazona al 0.2% y polietilenglicol (PEG) como vehículo. REPORTE DE CASO: Paciente masculino de 57 años, sin antecedentes de interés para el padecimiento actual, que inició con erupción cutánea, ampollas y exudado seroso 2 a 3 días después de aplicar Furacin® en una herida cutánea infectada. Se llevaron a cabo pruebas epicutáneas con batería true test, nitrofurantoína al 1% en vaselina, PEG 15000 y 4000 al 1% en vaselina, PEG 400 puro, y PEG monometil éter 350 al 1% en agua, con resultado positivo para nitrofurantoina luego de 96 horas. CONCLUSIÓN: La nitrofurazona se indica ampliamente como antibiótico tópico, debido a su espectro bactericida; no obstante, debe considerarse (incluidos sus excipientes) en pacientes que manifiestan reacciones adversas después de su aplicación.

Alzheimer's Disease Has Its Origins in Early Life via a Perturbed Microbiome.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder with limited therapeutic options. Accordingly, new approaches for prevention and treatment are needed. One focus is the human microbiome, the consortium of microorganisms that live in and on us, which contributes to human immune, metabolic, and cognitive development and that may have mechanistic roles in neurodegeneration. AD and Alzheimer's disease-related dementias (ADRD) are recognized as spectrum disorders with complex pathobiology. AD/ADRD onset begins before overt clinical signs, but initiation triggers remain undefined. We posit that disruption of the normal gut microbiome in early life leads to a pathological cascade within septohippocampal and cortical brain circuits. We propose investigation to understand how early-life microbiota changes may lead to hallmark AD pathology in established AD/ADRD models. Specifically, we hypothesize that antibiotic exposure in early life leads to exacerbated AD-like disease endophenotypes that may be amenable to specific microbiological interventions. We propose suitable models for testing these hypotheses.

Lack of Knowledge of Antibiotic Risks Contributes to Primary Care Patients' Expectations of Antibiotics for Common Symptoms.

Patient expectations of receiving antibiotics for common symptoms can trigger unnecessary use. We conducted a survey (n = 564) between January 2020 to June 2021 in public and private primary care clinics in Texas to study the prevalence and predictors of patients' antibiotic expectations for common symptoms/illnesses. We surveyed Black patients (33%) and Hispanic/Latine patients (47%), and over 93% expected to receive an antibiotic for at least 1 of the 5 pre-defined symptoms/illnesses. Public clinic patients were nearly twice as likely to expect antibiotics for sore throat, diarrhea, and cold/flu than private clinic patients. Lack of knowledge of potential risks of antibiotic use was associated with increased antibiotic expectations for diarrhea (odds ratio [OR] = 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.4) and cold/flu symptoms (OR = 2.9; 95% CI, 2.0-4.4). Lower education and inadequate health literacy were predictors of antibiotic expectations for diarrhea. Future antibiotic stewardship interventions should tailor patient education materials to include information on antibiotic risks and guidance on appropriate antibiotic indications.

The coming microbial crisis: Our antibiotic bubble is about to burst.

This month, the United Nations (UN) General Assembly will convene its second High-Level Meeting on antimicrobial resistance, urging UN member states to take decisive action against this growing threat. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has released a list of the drug-resistant bacterial and fungal infections that pose the greatest concern to public health. Yet, despite increasing warnings from infectious disease experts, the public remains largely unaware of the true scale of the problem. In a world where antibiotics still protect us from bacterial infections, we are shielded from experiencing antimicrobial resistance as an immediate threat to our daily lives.

Unveiling the association between fluoroquinolones and aortic diseases using real-world database analysis and pharmacological experiments.

Fluoroquinolones, which are widely used antibiotics, have been linked to aortic disease, which prompted an FDA warning in 2018. Recent reports have challenged the perception that fluoroquinolones pose a significant risk for vascular diseases. This study aimed to investigate whether fluoroquinolones increase the risk of aortic diseases by focusing on the onset of aortic dissection. Levofloxacin (LVFX), a fluoroquinolone, was studied in vitro using cultured vascular cells and in vivo using a mouse model prone to aortic dissection. Risk of adverse drug events was analyzed using VigiBase, a global safety database, and a retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the JMDC Claims database. LVFX resulted in endothelial cell injury and increased matrix metalloproteinases in vitro. However, in vivo studies showed no significant effect on elastin degradation or aortic dissection incidence. The effect of LVFX on endothelial injury was altered during the onset of dissection, exacerbating injury before onset but inhibiting it afterward. Safety database analysis showed no significant risk signals for aortic dissection associated with fluoroquinolones, which was supported by findings in the receipt database. Inconsistencies were observed in the in vitro and in vivo actions of fluoroquinolones and differences in their effects on aortic dissection and aneurysms. Despite cytotoxicity, the risk of aortic dissection was not significantly increased in clinical scenarios. Based on our findings, concerns regarding aortic diseases do not justify discontinuation of fluoroquinolone use. Further studies are needed to elucidate the conflicting actions of fluoroquinolones, taking into account background pathophysiology such as infection and inflammation.

Ten-day vonoprazan-based versus fourteen-day proton pump inhibitor-based therapy for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication in China: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background: A shorter treatment duration potentially offers the advantage of reducing adverse events (AEs) and enhancing patient compliance for Helicobacter pylori eradication. However, the difference in eradication rates between short-duration vonoprazan-based regimens and fourteen-day proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based therapy remained unknown. Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ten-day vonoprazan-based regimens with fourteen-day conventional PPI-based therapy for H. pylori eradication. Methods: We performed a comprehensive literature search up to November 28, 2023, using PubMed. A random-effects model was applied to conduct a meta-analysis to determine the pooled Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: This meta-analysis included four randomized controlled clinical trials with 1560 patients. The H. pylori eradication rate of ten-day vonoprazan-based regimens was comparable to that of fourteen-day PPI-based therapy (88.7% vs 82.9%, OR 1.53, 95% CI [0.85-2.75], p = .16) in ITT analysis. The incidence of AEs in ten-day vonoprazan-based therapy was also similar to the control group (11.2% vs 17.6%, OR 0.66, 95% CI [0.33-1.31], p = .24). Conclusion: Current evidence suggests that the ten-day vonoprazan-based regimen is as effective as fourteen-day PPI-based therapy in eradicating H. pylori, with comparable AEs. However, additional research is required for confirmation.