Assessing the safety and pharmacokinetics of casirivimab and imdevimab (CAS+IMD) in a cohort of pregnant outpatients with COVID-19: results from an adaptive, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 1/2/3 study.

OBJECTIVE: Pregnant women with COVID-19 are at elevated risk for severe outcomes, but clinical data on management of these patients are limited. Monoclonal antibodies, such as casirivimab plus imdevimab (CAS+IMD), have proven effective in treating non-pregnant adults with COVID-19, prompting further evaluation in pregnant women. METHODS: A phase 3 portion of an adaptive, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the safety, clinical outcomes, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of CAS+IMD (1200 mg or 2400 mg) in the treatment of pregnant outpatients with COVID-19 (NCT04425629). Participants were enrolled between December 2020 and November 2021, prior to the emergence of Omicron-lineage variants against which CAS+IMD is not active. Safety was evaluated in randomised participants who received study drug (n=80); clinical outcomes were evaluated in all randomised participants (n=82). Only two pregnant participants received placebo, limiting conclusions regarding treatment effect. Infants born to pregnant participants were followed for developmental outcomes ≤1 year of age. RESULTS: In pregnant participants, CAS+IMD was well tolerated, with no grade ≥2 hypersensitivity or infusion-related reactions reported. There were no participant deaths, and only one COVID-19-related medically attended visit. Although two pregnancies (3%) reported issues in the fetus/neonate, they were confounded by maternal history or considered to be due to an alternate aetiology. No adverse developmental outcomes in infants ≤1 year of age were considered related to in utero exposure to the study drug. CAS+IMD 1200 mg and 2400 mg rapidly and similarly reduced viral loads, with a dose-proportional increase in concentrations of CAS+IMD in serum. Pharmacokinetics were consistent with that reported in the general population. Immunogenicity incidence was low. CONCLUSION: CAS+IMD treatment of pregnant outpatients with COVID-19 showed similar safety, clinical outcomes and pharmacokinetic profiles to that observed in non-pregnant adults. There was no evidence of an impact on developmental outcomes in infants ≤1 year of age. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04425629.

Does early combination vs. Monotherapy improve clinical outcomes of clinically extremely vulnerable patients with COVID-19? Results from a retrospective propensity-weighted analysis.

BACKGROUND: The potential efficacy of early combination therapy, based on an antiviral plus a monoclonal antibody, for COVID-19 in severely immunocompromised patients is matter of debate. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to describe the impact on clinical outcomes of COVID-19 treatments in severely immunocompromised individuals, evaluating differences between a combination and a monotherapy. METHODS: We included severely immunocompromised outpatients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 who received an early treatment (either monotherapy with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or remdesivir or the combination of an antiviral plus sotrovimab). We then assessed differences between the two treatment strategies on three main outcomes (30-day mortality, access to emergency department, hospitalization), separately and as a composite by using a propensity score weighted (PSW) approach. RESULTS: Eighty one severely immunocompromised patients were included, 39 receiving early combination therapy and 42 receiving monotherapy. No significant difference was observed in the 30-day mortality rate and hospitalization rate between subjects in the two groups, while access to the emergency department following treatment administration was significantly higher in people who received a combination therapy. After applying the PSW, it was observed that combination therapy impacted favourably on the composite outcome, in a statistically significant fashion. In addition, PSW approach for mortality showed that age was the only significant factor influencing the death as stand-alone outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Early combination therapy showed a favourable impact on a composite outcome (including mortality, hospitalizations and access to emergency department) in severely immunocompromised hosts who were all vaccinated. However, further studies are needed to support our results.

Letermovir at a Prophylactic Dose for Cytomegalovirus Infection in Children Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Single-Center Retrospective Study in Japan.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Previous studies in adults demonstrated that letermovir prophylaxis for 100 d after HSCT reduces the occurrence of CMV infection; however, studies in children are limited. In this study, we aimed to examine the incidence of CMV infection in children who underwent allogeneic HSCT with prophylactic letermovir therapy. A single-center retrospective study was conducted among patients aged ≤17 who underwent allogeneic HSCT. We compared the cumulative incidence of CMV infection, mainly monitored by pp65-antigenemia, after HSCT between patients with and without letermovir prophylaxis (10-12 or 5-6 mg/kg/d when co-administered with cyclosporine) using Gray's test. We analyzed 79 patients with a median follow-up period of 126 d. The median age of these patients was 8.3 years (Interquartile range, 3.7-12.4). Prophylactic letermovir was used in 25 patients. Twenty-five patients developed CMV infection, and the cumulative incidence was 38.9% (95% confidence intervals, 25.0-52.5). The cumulative incidence of CMV infection was not significantly different between the letermovir and no-letermovir groups (33.1 vs. 36.6%, p = 0.228). Meanwhile, the cumulative incidence of CMV infection up to 100 d following HSCT was significantly lower in the letermovir group than in the no-letermovir group (8.0 vs. 32.8%, p = 0.026). Most patients experienced no noticeable adverse effects associated with letermovir; however, one patient discontinued letermovir because of nausea and anorexia. In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that letermovir prophylaxis against CMV infection may be effective in children without severe adverse effects.

The effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir regimen in hospitalized renal transplant patients with prolonged COVID-19 infection: a multicenter clinical experience.

OBJECTIVES: Effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NR) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) infected COVID-19 for more than 5 days has not been evaluated. METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective study, 85 KTRs with COVID-19 were enrolled, including 50 moderate, 21 severe, and 14 critical patients. RESULTS: The median time from onset to starting NR treatment was 14 (IQR, 11-19) days. Before NR treatment, 96.5% patients reduced use of antimetabolites. They also stopped using calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) 12-24 hours before NR treatment, with CNI concentrations well-controlled during NR treatment. The use of intravenous corticosteroids increased with COVID-19 severity. The median time to reach viral negative conversion was 5 (IQR, 4-8) days for all patients. For moderate and severe COVID-19 patients, they had a low rate of ICU admission (1.4%), exacerbation requiring upgraded oxygen therapy (5.6%), and dialysis (2.8%); no intubation and mechanical ventilation, and no deaths were observed. Patients with critical COVID-19 had a low mortality rate (7.1%). CONCLUSIONS: A regimen including NR for clearing SARS-CoV-2 along with reducing immunosuppressants and using intravenous corticosteroids is associated with lower rates of exacerbation and mortality in KTRs who have moderate to critical SARS-CoV-2 infection and the virus still present after 5 days.

Role of tenofovir dipivoxil in gut microbiota recovery from HBV-infection induced dysbiosis.

BACKGROUND: Studies have found dysbiosis of the gut microbiota in individuals infected with the hepatitis B virus (HBV). Tenofovir dipivoxil (TDF) is one of the preferred oral antiviral drugs used for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB), but the extent to which TDF is able to affect the gut microbiota and inflammatory factors of a patient remains largely unexplored. In this study, we collected stool samples from HBV patients prior to medication and from CHB patients treated with TDF. RESULTS: The gut microbiota and inflammatory factors were assessed in 42 healthy subjects (HC group), 109 HBV-infected subjects, including 48 CHB patients who were not medicated with nucleoside analogue drugs (No-NAs group), and 61 CHB patients who were medicated with TDF (TDF group). 16 S rRNA sequencing revealed that TDF treatment caused significant changes in the gut microbiota of HBV-infected individuals; however, the gut microbiota of HBV-infected individuals did not fully recover to a pre-dysbiosis state. The relative abundance of Bacteroidota gradually decreased from the HC group to the No-NAs and TDF groups. The relative abundance of Fusobacteriota was significantly higher in the No-NAs group than in the HC group. At the genus level, Dialister, Eubacterium_hallii_group, Halomonas, Collinsella, Sphingomonas, Xanthomonadaceae_unclassified, and Rhizobiaceae_unclassified were overrepresented; while the abundance of Bacteroides and Fusobacterium decreased significantly in the No-NAs and TDF groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that TDF treatment significantly improved the regulation of the gut microbiota and aided in dysbiosis recovery. We did not observe significant improvement in serum inflammatory factor concentrations, which may be related to the relatively short duration of TDF administration in this study.

Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Shows Liver Fibrosis Regression on Three Noninvasive Tests: A Puerto Rican Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) drugs have resulted in high rates of virological cure in chronic hepatitis C (CHC)-infected patients. We used noninvasive tests to assess fibrosis in subjects who had been cured with DAA. METHODS: Retrospective data collection (2014-2019) from the medical record of CHC patients at the hepatology clinic was performed. Subjects co-infected with HIV and hepatitis B, post-liver transplant, and lost to follow-up were excluded. We evaluated fibrosis at baseline and 1 year after completing therapy using vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), and aspartate aminotransferase-toplatelet ratio index (APRI) scores. RESULTS: With 210 medical records reviewed, 41 were included. The mean age was 62.8 years; 61% were men. Significant fibrosis regression was observed 1-year post-treatment using 3 noninvasive methods: VCTE, APRI, and FIB-4 score. Prior to treatment, 46% of the patients had advanced fibrosis compared to 25% 1 year after treatment. The VCTE scores of 4 subjects (with body mass indices [BMIs] > 30) indicated a worsening of fibrosis. We did not find a statistically significant association between BMI and VCTE, FIB-4, or APRI score. CONCLUSION: In most CHC patients, DAA therapy leads to liver fibrosis regression. Obesity may play an important role in the worsening of hepatic fibrosis or the absence of fibrosis regression.

Astodrimer sodium nasal spray forms a barrier to SARS-CoV-2 in vitro and preserves normal mucociliary function in human nasal epithelium.

COVID-19 remains a severe condition for many including immunocompromised individuals. There remains a need for effective measures against this and other respiratory infections, which transmit via virus-laden droplets that reach the nasal or oral mucosae. Nasal sprays offer potential protection against viruses. Such formulations should preserve normal nasal mucociliary function. The antiviral barrier efficacy and effects on mucociliary function of astodrimer sodium nasal spray (AS-NS) were evaluated and compared with other available nasal sprays-low pH hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC-NS), iota-carrageenan (Carr-NS), nitric oxide (NO-NS), and povidone iodine (PI-NS). Assays simulated clinical conditions. Antiviral barrier function and cell viability were assessed in airway cell monolayers, while a model of fully differentiated human nasal epithelium (MucilAir™) was utilized to evaluate tissue integrity, cytotoxicity, cilia beating frequency, and mucociliary clearance. AS-NS reduced infectious virus in cell monolayers and demonstrated a benign cytotoxicity profile. In human nasal epithelium ex vivo, AS-NS had no impact on mucociliary function (cilia beating nor mucociliary clearance). Carr-NS, HPMC-NS, NO-NS and PI-NS demonstrated limited antiviral effects, while HPMC-NS caused inhibition of mucociliary function. Astodrimer sodium nasal spray demonstrates an acceptable nonclinical efficacy and safety profile as a barrier nasal spray against respiratory viral infection in the nasal cavity.

Molecular and phenotypic characteristics of respiratory syncytial virus isolates recovered from medically vulnerable children: An exploratory analysis of a phase 2/3 randomized, double-blind, palivizumab-controlled trial of nirsevimab (MEDLEY).

BACKGROUND: Nirsevimab is an extended half-life monoclonal antibody (mAb) licensed for the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-associated lower respiratory tract disease in neonates, infants and medically vulnerable children. We characterized RSV isolates recovered from participants enrolled in MEDLEY: a randomized, palivizumab-controlled phase 2/3 trial of nirsevimab in infants born preterm and/or with congenital heart disease or chronic lung disease of prematurity. METHODS: Participants were assessed in two RSV seasons (Season 1 and 2). Season 1 participants were randomized (2:1) to receive a single dose of nirsevimab (50 mg if weight <5 kg or 100 mg if weight ≥5 kg in Season 1; 200 mg in Season 2) followed by four monthly doses of placebo, or five once-monthly doses of palivizumab (15 mg/kg weight per dose). Season 2 participants continued nirsevimab and placebo (nirsevimab/nirsevimab) or were re-randomized (1:1) to switch to nirsevimab (palivizumab/nirsevimab) or continue palivizumab (palivizumab/palivizumab). Cases of RSV infection were identified by central testing of nasal swabs from participants seeking medical attention for respiratory illnesses. Nirsevimab and palivizumab binding site substitutions were assessed via microneutralization assay. RESULTS: Twenty-five cases of confirmed RSV infection were observed during the trial and sequenced: 12 in nirsevimab recipients and 10 in palivizumab recipients during Season 1, and 1 case in each Season 2 group. Molecular sequencing of RSV A (n = 14) isolates detected no nirsevimab binding site substitutions, and 3 palivizumab neutralization-resistant substitutions (Lys272Met, Lys272Thr, Ser275Leu). The nirsevimab binding site Ile206Met:Gln209Arg and Ile206Met:Gln209Arg:Ser211Asn substitutions were the only anti-RSV mAb binding site substitutions detected among RSV B isolates (n = 11). Nirsevimab neutralized all nirsevimab and palivizumab binding site substitutions in RSV A and B isolates recovered from MEDLEY participants. CONCLUSION: No binding site substitution detected during MEDLEY affected RSV susceptibility to nirsevimab neutralization.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of COVID-19 booster doses and oral antivirals: Case studies in the Indo-Pacific.

BACKGROUND: Decision-makers in middle-income countries need evidence on the cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 booster doses and oral antivirals to appropriately prioritise these healthcare interventions. METHODS: We used a dynamic transmission model to assess the cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 booster doses and oral antivirals in Fiji, Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, and Timor-Leste. We conducted cost-effectiveness analysis from both healthcare and societal perspectives using data collated from publicly available sources. We developed an interactive R Shiny which allows the user to vary key model assumptions, such as the choice of discounting rate, and view how these assumptions affect model results. FINDINGS: Booster doses were cost saving and therefore cost-effective in all four middle-income settings from both healthcare and societal perspectives using 3% discounting. Providing oral antivirals was cost-effective from a healthcare perspective if procured at a low generic price (US$25) or middle-income reference price (US$250); however, their cost-effectiveness was strongly influenced by rates of wastage or misuse, and the ongoing costs of care for patients hospitalised with COVID-19. The cost or wastage of rapid antigen tests did not appear strongly influential over the cost-effectiveness of oral antivirals in any of the four study settings. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support that COVID-19 booster programs are cost-effective in middle-income settings. Oral antivirals demonstrate the potential to be cost-effective if procured at or below a middle-income reference price of US$250 per schedule. Further research should quantify the rates of wastage or misuse of oral COVID-19 antivirals in middle-income settings.

Tecovirimat Use under Expanded Access to Treat Mpox in the United States, 2022-2023.

BACKGROUND: During the ongoing outbreak of clade II monkeypox virus (MPXV), many U.S. patients were prescribed tecovirimat, an antiviral drug that was made available under an expanded access Investigational New Drug (EA-IND) program. We evaluated EA-IND data to summarize characteristics of treated patients, outcomes, and serious adverse events (SAEs). METHODS: We evaluated data from patients prescribed tecovirimat from May 29, 2022, through July 10, 2023. Baseline patient characteristics, clinical courses, and outcomes were evaluated via intake forms, outcome forms, and patient diaries. Data were summarized in aggregate by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status and by comorbidities of special interest. Reported SAEs were also compiled. RESULTS: Tecovirimat was prescribed for over 7100 patients in the United States, most often for lesions in sensitive anatomical areas, such as certain anogenital lesions (83.5%; 5135 out of 6148 patients), and pain (52.5%; 3227 out of 6148 patients). The demographic and clinical characteristics mirrored those of patients worldwide. Among the 7181 patients with returned intake forms, 1626 also had returned outcome forms (22.6%). Many patients with severe immunocompromise (e.g., HIV with CD4 counts <200 cells/µl) received multiple courses of tecovirimat (43.1%; 22 out of 51 patients), including intravenously, and often experienced poor outcomes (35.3%; 18 out of 51 patients). Overall, 223 SAEs and 40 deaths were reported. Most SAEs were among patients who were severely immunocompromised, one of whom experienced hallucinations after tecovirimat was administered at twice the standard dose. CONCLUSIONS: Tecovirimat was used extensively. The returned EA-IND data suggest that life-threatening or protracted infections occurred in persons who were severely immunocompromised. SAEs were not commonly reported. The EA-IND data are not definitive; controlled clinical trial data are essential to elucidating if and how tecovirimat should be used.

Sonication-Assisted Self-Assembled Resveratrol Nanoparticles with Enhanced Antiviral and Anti-inflammatory Activity against Respiratory Syncytial Virus-Induced Pneumonia.

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-induced viral pneumonia in children is common worldwide. Its high occurrence and lack of an effective vaccine make it a leading cause of death in children. Severe RSV infection can trigger uncontrolled inflammatory responses in patients, so the development of small molecule drugs with the dual function of "direct antivirus" and "inflammatory response regulation" is welcome. Resveratrol (Res) has been reported to have antiviral and anti-inflammatory pharmacological effects, but its application is limited because of its poor water solubility and oral bioavailability. Based on small-molecule nanotechnology, we developed a sonication-assisted self-assembly method for preparing insoluble Res into highly soluble resveratrol nanoparticles (Res NPs). The obtained Res NPs exhibited a higher water solubility and a faster dissolution rate, which was more conducive to the effectiveness of Res in addressing RSV-induced viral pneumonia. In vitro studies had shown that Res NPs played an antiviral role by inhibiting RSV replication and reducing the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Nebulized inhalation administration of Res NPs prolonged the drug's residence time in the lungs, which appears to increase the accumulation and effectiveness of Res NPs. Additionally, in vivo studies had demonstrated significant benefits of Res NPs in inhibiting RSV viral load and improving the pulmonary microenvironment in RSV-infected mice. Both antiviral and anti-inflammatory experiments had confirmed that the pharmacological activity of Res NPs is superior to that of Res. This suggested that nanosizing Res was an effective way to enhance the original pharmacological activity of Res and also offered a new formulation strategy for treating viral pneumonia.

Ziresovir in Hospitalized Infants with Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of severe illness in infants, with no effective treatment. Results of a phase 2 trial suggested that ziresovir may have efficacy in the treatment of infants hospitalized with RSV infection. METHODS: In a phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted in China, we enrolled participants 1 to 24 months of age who were hospitalized with RSV infection. Participants were randomly assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive ziresovir (at a dose of 10 to 40 mg, according to body weight) or placebo, administered twice daily, for 5 days. The primary end point was the change from baseline to day 3 (defined as 48 hours after the first administration) in the Wang bronchiolitis clinical score (total scores range from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating greater severity of signs and symptoms). The intention-to-treat population included all the participants with RSV-confirmed infection who received at least one dose of ziresovir or placebo; the safety population included all the participants who received at least one dose of ziresovir or placebo. RESULTS: The intention-to-treat population included 244 participants, and the safety population included 302. The reduction from baseline in the Wang bronchiolitis clinical score at day 3 was significantly greater with ziresovir than with placebo (-3.4 points [95% confidence interval {CI}, -3.7 to -3.1] vs. -2.7 points [95% CI, -3.1 to -2.2]; difference, -0.8 points [95% CI, -1.3 to -0.3]; P = 0.002). The reduction in the RSV viral load at day 5 was greater in the ziresovir group than in the placebo group (-2.5 vs. -1.9 log10 copies per milliliter; difference, -0.6 log10 copies per milliliter [95% CI, -1.1 to -0.2]). Improvements were observed in prespecified subgroups, including in participants with a baseline bronchiolitis score of at least 8 and in those 6 months of age or younger. The incidence of adverse events related to the drug or placebo was 16% with ziresovir and 13% with placebo. The most common adverse events that were assessed by the investigator as being related to the drug or placebo were diarrhea (in 4% and 2% of the participants, respectively), an elevated liver-enzyme level (in 3% and 3%, respectively), and rash (in 2% and 1%). Resistance-associated mutations were identified in 15 participants (9%) in the ziresovir group. CONCLUSIONS: Ziresovir treatment reduced signs and symptoms of bronchiolitis in infants and young children hospitalized with RSV infection. No safety concerns were identified. (Funded by Shanghai Ark Biopharmaceutical; AIRFLO ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04231968.).

An Inhalable Nanoshield for Effective Prevention of Influenza Virus Infections.

Influenza virus (IV) infection currently poses a serious and continuing threat to the global public health. Developing effective prevention strategies is important to defend against infection and spread of IV. Here, we developed a triple-protective nanoshield against IV infection in the lungs, formed by self-assembling DSPE-PEG amphiphilic polymers encapsulating the flu-preventive antiviral drug Arbidol internally. The preventive effect of the nanoshield against virus infection includes increasing the viscosity in the surrounding environment to physically defend against viral entry, forming a hydrated layer to block the interaction between viruses and cells, and inhibiting virus replication. Our finding suggested that a single inhalation of the nanoshield provides effective protection against IV infection for at least 8 h. Thus, this nanoshield may be a potential pandemic protection agent against IV, especially in viral environments, where no prophylactic or therapeutic measures are available.

Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Nirsevimab in Immunocompromised Children.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Immunocompromised children may have increased risk for severe respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI), potentially leading to prolonged hospitalization, intensive care, and death. The open-label phase II MUSIC trial evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics of nirsevimab, an extended half-life monoclonal antibody against RSV, in immunocompromised children aged ≤24 months. METHODS: Participants received a single intramuscular injection of nirsevimab (first RSV season: 50 mg if <5 kg/100 mg if ≥5 kg; second season: 200 mg). Safety, antidrug antibodies, and pharmacokinetics were evaluated to day 361. RESULTS: Participants (n = 100) had ≥1 immunocompromising conditions: primary immunodeficiency (n = 33), previous transplantation (n = 16), HIV infection (n = 8) or treatment with high-dose systemic corticosteroids (n = 29), immunosuppressive chemotherapy (n = 20), or other immunosuppressive therapies (n = 15). Six children experienced eight treatment-related adverse events (none categorized as serious). Three deaths occurred, all were unrelated to treatment. Eleven children, developed antidrug antibodies, with minimal effects on pharmacokinetics and no apparent impact on safety. Nirsevimab serum concentrations at day 151 were similar to those effective in preventing medically attended RSV LRTI in healthy infants. Fourteen children had increased nirsevimab clearance. No protocol-defined medically attended RSV LRTIs occured through day 151. CONCLUSIONS: Among immunocompromised children aged ≤24 months, nirsevimab was well tolerated with no safety concerns and serum concentrations were supportive of efficacy. A subset of children with increased nirsevimab clearance, had conditions potentially associated with protein loss; however, the impact on efficacy is unknown.

A Phase 1, Single-Dose Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Bepirovirsen in Adults with Hepatic Impairment and Healthy Participants (B-Assured).

Bepirovirsen is a developmental antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) for treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. No pharmacokinetic (PK) studies comparing participants with hepatic impairment (HI) and healthy participants (HPs) have been conducted with ASOs. Given the target patient population, characterization of bepirovirsen PK in HI was imperative. This phase 1, nonrandomized, open-label study (NCT04971928) evaluated the PKs of a single 300-mg dose of bepirovirsen in participants with HI and matched HPs, enrolled in 2 parts (Part 1: moderate HI; Part 2: mild HI). If no predefined difference in the area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 (predose) to infinite time (AUC0-∞) and maximum observed concentration (Cmax; geometric mean ratio [GMR] 0.5-1.5) was identified in Part 1, findings were applied to mild HI, eliminating Part 2. Participants were monitored for 50 days post-treatment and noncompartmental analysis estimated PK parameters. Twenty-four participants (moderate HI, n = 12; HP, n = 12) received bepirovirsen and completed Part 1. AUC0-∞ and Cmax were lower in participants with moderate HI (GMR 0.69 and 0.67, respectively) than in HPs, while apparent clearance (CL/F) and apparent terminal phase volume of distribution (Vz/F) were higher (GMR 1.44 and 1.64, respectively), but fell within the predefined thresholds of difference for this study. Part 2 was omitted. Adverse events were mild. Moderate HI did not have a clinically relevant impact on bepirovirsen PK or safety.

Serum ganciclovir drug exposure in children receiving standard ganciclovir dosing.

Intravenous ganciclovir (GCV) is used for the treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in immunocompromised children. Although the therapeutic target for treatment is unclear, studies have shown a serum area under the concentration-time curve (AUC24h) ≥40 mg/L·h correlates with effective CMV prevention. This study aimed to externally validate existing GCV population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) models and develop a model if needed and evaluate the serum AUC24h achieved with standard GCV dosing and propose an optimized dosing strategy for immunocompromised children. Ganciclovir drug monitoring data from two pediatric hospitals were retrospectively collected, and published pediatric PopPK models were externally validated. The population AUC24h with standard GCV dosing (5 mg/kg twice daily) was calculated, and an optimized dosing strategy was determined using Monte Carlo simulations to achieve an AUC24h between 40 and 100 mg/L·h. Overall, 161 samples from 23 children with a median (range) age of 9.0 years (0.4-17.0) and weight of 28.2 kg (5.6-73.3) were analyzed. Transferability of published pediatric PopPK models was limited. Thus, a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination with weight and serum creatinine as covariates was developed. The median (5th-95th percentiles) steady state AUC24h with standard dosing was 38.3 mg/L·h (24.8-329.2) with 13 children having an AUC24h <40 mg/L·h, particularly those aged <4 years (8/13). An optimized simulated GCV dosing regimen, ranging from 2 to 13 mg/kg twice daily for children with normal renal function, achieved 61%-78% probability of target attainment. Standard GCV dosing likely results in inadequate drug exposure in more than half of the children, particularly those aged <4 years. An optimized dosing regimen has been proposed for clinical validation.

Lyotropic liquid crystal emulsions of LAVR-289: Influence of internal mesophase structure on cytotoxicity and in-vitro antiviral activity.

Emerging and reemerging viruses pose significant public health threats, underscoring the urgent need for new antiviral drugs. Recently, a novel family of antiviral acyclic nucleoside phosphonates (ANP) composed of a 4-(2,4-diaminopyrimidin-6-yl)oxy-but-2-enyl phosphonic acid skeleton (O-DAPy nucleobase) has shown promise. Among these, LAVR-289 stands out for its potent inhibitory effects against various DNA viruses. Despite its efficacy, LAVR-289s poor water solubility hampers effective drug delivery. To address this, innovative delivery systems utilizing lipidic derivatives have been explored for various administration routes. Submicron lyotropic liquid crystals (LLCs) are particularly promising drug carriers for the encapsulation, protection, and delivery of lipophilic drugs like LAVR-289. This study focuses on developing submicron-sized lipid mesophase dispersions, including emulsified L2 phase, cubosomes, and hexosomes, by adjusting lipidic compounds such as Dimodan® U/J, Lecithins E80, and Miglyol® 812 N. These formulations aim to enhance the solubility and bioavailability of LAVR-289. In vitro evaluations demonstrated that LAVR-289-loaded LLCs at a concentration of 1 µM efficiently inhibited vaccinia virus in infected human cells, with no observed cytotoxicity. Notably, hexosomes exhibited the most favorable antiviral outcomes, suggesting that the internal mesophase structure plays a critical role in optimizing the therapeutic efficacy of this drug class.

Immunomodulatory markers and therapies for the management of infant respiratory syncytial virus infection.

INTRODUCTION: The human respiratory syncytial virus (hRSV) is one of childhood diseases' most common respiratory pathogens and is associated with lower respiratory tract infections. The peak in disease that this virus can elicit during outbreaks is often a significant burden for healthcare systems worldwide. Despite theapproval of treatments against hRSV, this pathogen remains one the most common causative agent of infant mortality around the world. AREAS COVERED: This review focuses on the key prognostic and immunomodulatory biomarkers associated with hRSV infection, as well as prophylactic monoclonal antibodies and vaccines. The goal is to catalyze a paradigm shift within the scientific community toward the discovery of novel targets to predict the clinical outcome of infected patients, as well as the development of novel antiviral agents targeting hRSV. The most pertinent research on this topic was systematically searched and analyzed using PubMed ISI Thomson Scientific databases. EXPERT OPINION: Despite advances in approved therapies against hRSV, it is crucial to continue researching to develop new therapies and to find specific biomarkers to predict the severity of infection. Along these lines, the use of multi-omics data, artificial intelligence and natural-derived compounds with antiviral activity could be evaluated to fight hRSV and develop methods for rapid diagnosis of severity.