ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Females with acetabular dysplasia and/or labral tears (hip pain) exhibit altered walking kinematics, with studies reporting mixed results in sagittal and frontal planes compared to pain-free controls, often conducting only discrete analyses and warranting further investigation. The objective of this study was to investigate discrete and continuous hip and pelvic kinematics between females with and without hip pain in two walking conditions. METHODS: We collected kinematic walking data from 69 females (35 with hip pain, 34 controls) using motion capture and an instrumented treadmill in two conditions: preferred and fast (125% preferred). We used a general linear model and one-dimensional statistical parametric mapping to conduct discrete and continuous analyses comparing kinematics between groups, with and without adjustment for gait speed. FINDINGS: The hip pain group walked with reduced peak hip extension (Preferred: P = .046, Cohen's d = 0.41; Fast: P = .028, d = 0.48) and greater peak anterior pelvic tilt (Preferred: P = .011, d = 0.57; Fast: P = .012, d = 0.58) compared to controls. From continuous analyses, the hip pain group walked with reduced hip extension during terminal stance (Fast: P = .040), greater anterior pelvic tilt throughout (Preferred: P = .007; Fast: P = .004), and greater contralateral pelvic drop (Preferred: P = .045) during midstance. Adjusting for speed slightly affected p-values, but significance was retained for all prior variables except pelvic drop. INTERPRETATION: Kinematic differences between individuals with and without hip pain may provide insight into potential predisposing factors for hip pathology and/or compensations for pain or pathological processes. This work furthers understanding of altered movement patterns in individuals with hip pain and may inform physical therapy treatments.
Subject(s)
Gait , Hip Joint , Walking , Humans , Female , Biomechanical Phenomena , Walking/physiology , Gait/physiology , Adult , Hip Joint/physiopathology , Young Adult , Arthralgia/physiopathology , Range of Motion, Articular , Pain/physiopathology , Hip/physiopathologyABSTRACT
This infographic accompanies the editorial which critically evaluates how hip-related pain is currently managed, highlighting the limitations of traditional biomedical interventions alone in restoring optimal function and well-being. Psychological factors are key determinants of outcomes after surgical and nonsurgical treatment. We highlight the need for a holistic, patient-centered approach in evaluating and treating hip-related pain. Shifting to a holistic, patient-centered approach can improve treatment outcomes and reduce patient suffering. We guide readers to the impact of psychological factors on treatment outcomes, provide clinical considerations for how clinicians might approach psychologically informed practice, and outline future research directions. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(8):573. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.9003.
Subject(s)
Hip Joint , Humans , Hip Joint/physiopathology , Patient-Centered Care , Arthralgia/therapy , Arthralgia/psychology , Arthralgia/physiopathology , Holistic Health , Pain Management/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a common comorbidity of osteoarthritis (OA). Joint pain is the main clinical manifestation of OA. Knowledge about the relationship between hypertension and OA pain is limited. This study aimed to investigate whether blood pressure parameters are associated with knee pain severity in individuals with or at risks for OA. METHODS: Our sample consisted of 2598 subjects (60.7% female, aged 45-79 years) collected from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Blood pressure parameters included blood pressure stage, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and pulse pressure (PP). Radiographic evaluation using Kellgren-Lawrence system and pain severity evaluation using Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) were performed for right knee. Linear regression was used to examine the relationship between blood pressure parameters and knee pain severity. RESULTS: For the overall sample, blood pressure stage, SBP, and PP were positively correlated with WOMAC and NRS pain scores when adjusting for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) (p ≤ 0.024) and were inversely correlated with KOOS score (p ≤ 0.004). After further adjusting for all covariates, PP remained a positive correlation with WOMAC score (p = 0.037) while other associations between blood pressure parameters and pain scores did not reach the statistical significance. In female, higher blood pressure stage, SBP, and PP were significantly associated with increased WOMAC and NRS scores and decreased KOOS score after adjustments of age and BMI (p ≤ 0.018). When adjusting for all covariates, the correlations of PP with WOMAC, KOOS and NRS scores remained significant (p = 0.008-0.049). In male sample, SBP was positively correlated with WOMAC score when adjusting for age and BMI (p = 0.050), but other associations between blood pressure parameters and pain scores were not statistically significant. No significant correlation was observed in male when further adjusting for other covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Increased PP is a risk factor for knee pain and mainly affects females, which suggested that controlling PP may be beneficial in preventing or reducing knee pain in females with or at risks for OA.
Subject(s)
Arthralgia , Blood Pressure , Osteoarthritis, Knee , Pain Measurement , Severity of Illness Index , Humans , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Osteoarthritis, Knee/epidemiology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/diagnosis , Blood Pressure/physiology , Arthralgia/physiopathology , Arthralgia/epidemiology , Arthralgia/diagnosis , Arthralgia/etiology , Risk Factors , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging , Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertension/physiopathology , Hypertension/diagnosis , Cross-Sectional StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To examine associations of vibration sensitivity and pressure pain sensitivity with knee osteoarthritis (OA) outcomes across sex and race, which may relate to known sex and race disparities in clinical outcomes. DESIGN: Data were from the 2013-2015 visit of the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project. Exposures were vibration perception threshold (VPT) measured at the bilateral medial femoral condyle (MFC) and first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTP), and pressure pain threshold (PPT) measured at the bilateral upper trapezius. Outcomes were knee pain severity and presence of knee symptoms, radiographic knee OA, and symptomatic knee OA in each knee. Cross-sectional associations of the exposures with the outcomes were examined using logistic regression models, overall and separately by sex and race. RESULTS: In the VPT and PPT analyses, 851 and 862 participants (mean age 71 years, 68% female, 33% Black, body mass index 31 kg/m2) and 1585 and 1660 knees were included, respectively. Higher VPT (lower vibration sensitivity) at the MFC and first MTP joint was associated with all outcomes. Lower PPT (greater pressure pain sensitivity) was associated with greater knee pain severity. Associations of VPT and PPT with all outcomes were similar among females and males and Black and White individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Diminished vibration perception and greater pressure pain sensitivity were cross-sectionally associated with worse knee OA outcomes. Despite differences in VPT and PPT among females and males and Black and White adults, associations with knee OA outcomes did not differ by sex or race, suggesting neurophysiological differences do not relate to established disparities.
Subject(s)
Osteoarthritis, Knee , Pain Threshold , Pressure , Vibration , Humans , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Male , Female , Aged , Pain Threshold/physiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Middle Aged , Sex Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Pain Measurement , Arthralgia/physiopathology , Arthralgia/etiologyABSTRACT
This systematic review aimed to synthesise the content, structure, and delivery characteristics of effective yoga interventions for managing osteoarthritis symptoms, including joint pain and joint function. JBI guidelines were followed. 17 databases were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing yoga's effectiveness on osteoarthritis symptoms. Meta-analyses and a narrative synthesis were conducted to address the objective. The systematic review and meta-analysis included 18 and 16 articles (representing 16 and 14 RCTs), respectively. Overall, the included studies had low methodological quality scores. 10 of 14 yoga interventions effectively reduced pain (standardised mean difference (SMD) - 0.70; 95% confidence interval (CI) - 1.08, - 0.32) and/or improved function (- 0.40; - 0.75, - 0.04). Notably, 8 effective interventions had centre-based (supervised, group) sessions, and 6 included additional home-based (unsupervised, individual) sessions. Effective interventions included 34 yogic poses (12 sitting, 10 standing, 8 supine, 4 prone), 8 breathing practices, and 3 meditation and relaxation practices. 8 interventions included yogic poses, and 7 also incorporated breathing practices and/or meditation and relaxation practices. 4 interventions included yogic pose modifications for osteoarthritis. The median duration of centre-based sessions was 8 weeks and each session was around 53 min, mostly delivered once a week. The median duration of home-based sessions was 10 weeks and each session was 30 min, usually instructed to practice 4 times a week. Given previous studies' limitations, a high-quality long-term RCT should be conducted using synthesised findings of previous effective yoga interventions.
Subject(s)
Osteoarthritis , Yoga , Humans , Osteoarthritis/therapy , Osteoarthritis/rehabilitation , Treatment Outcome , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Arthralgia/therapy , Arthralgia/physiopathology , Meditation , AgedSubject(s)
Exercise Therapy , Osteoarthritis, Knee , Platelet-Rich Plasma , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Osteoarthritis, Knee/therapy , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Humans , Exercise Therapy/methods , Treatment Outcome , Combined Modality Therapy , Recovery of Function , Pain Measurement , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Knee Joint/surgery , Arthralgia/therapy , Arthralgia/physiopathology , Arthralgia/etiology , Arthralgia/diagnosisSubject(s)
Exercise Therapy , Osteoarthritis, Knee , Platelet-Rich Plasma , Humans , Osteoarthritis, Knee/therapy , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Exercise Therapy/methods , Treatment Outcome , Pain Measurement , Recovery of Function , Combined Modality Therapy , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Knee Joint/surgery , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Arthralgia/therapy , Arthralgia/physiopathology , Arthralgia/etiology , Arthralgia/diagnosisABSTRACT
Female gender is one of the commonly mentioned risk factors for anterior knee pain (AKP), among a spectrum of other factors including anatomical, biomechanical, hormonal, behavioral and psychological elements contributing to its development. Despite the focus on individual risk factors, there's a notable gap in comprehending how gender influences and interacts with other risk factors. The objective of this review was to identify and emphasize the connections between these interactions, gender-related risk factors for AKP, and the potential mechanisms that explain their associations with other risk factors, aiming to aid in the creation of precise prevention and treatment approaches. Gender influences the majority of risk factors for AKP, including anatomical, biomechanical, hormonal, behavioral and psychological factors. Women have on average smaller patellae, higher patellofemoral cartilage stress and for AKP, disadvantageous trochlear morphology, ligament and muscle composition and unfavorable neuromuscular control pattern. In contrast, men show on average an increased ability to strengthen their hip external rotators, which are both protective against AKP. Particularly in kinetic and kinematic analysis, men have been shown to have a distinctly different risk factor profile than women. Sex hormones may also play a role in the risk of AKP, with estrogen potentially influencing ligamentous laxity, increasing midfoot loading and affecting neuromuscular control of the lower extremities and testosterone positively affecting muscle mass and strength. The higher incidence of AKP in women is likely due to a combination of slightly increased risk factors. Although all risk factors can be present in both men and women and the holistic evaluation of each individual's risk factor composition is imperative regardless of gender, knowing distinctive risk factors may help with focused evaluation, treatment and implementing preventive measures of AKP.
Subject(s)
Knee Joint , Sex Characteristics , Humans , Female , Biomechanical Phenomena , Risk Factors , Male , Sex Factors , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Gonadal Steroid Hormones/metabolism , Arthralgia/physiopathology , PatellaABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Hand osteoarthritis (OA) pain is characterized as heterogeneous and multifactorial. Differences in pain may be explained by underlying phenotypes, which have not been previously explored DESIGN: Latent class analysis determined classes of participants with hand OA from the Nor-Hand study baseline examination (2016-17) based on a biopsychosocial framework. Outcomes were hand and overall bodily pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale, 0-10) at baseline and follow-up (2019-21), The relations of the classes to pain outcomes at baseline, follow-up, and change over time were analysed in separate models by linear regression, using the overall healthiest class as reference. RESULTS: Five classes differing in radiographic hand OA burden and OA burden in the lower extremities by ultrasound, demographic factors, psychosocial burden and pain sensitization was identified. Persons with the least severe OA but higher burden of biopsychosocial factors reported the most hand pain (beta 3.65, 95% CI 2.53, 4.75). Pain was less pronounced in persons with the most severe hand OA but low burden of biopsychosocial factors (beta 1.03, 95% CI 0.41, 1.65). Results were similar for overall bodily pain and at follow-up. Changes in pain were small, but the association between a separate class defined by higher levels of biopsychosocial burden and pain changes was significant. CONCLUSION: The five hand OA phenotypes were associated with pain at baseline and 3.5 years later. The phenotype with the least OA severity, but higher burden of biopsychosocial factors reported more pain than the phenotype with the most severe OA, reflecting the symptom-structure discordance of the hand OA pain experience.
Subject(s)
Hand Joints , Osteoarthritis , Pain Measurement , Phenotype , Humans , Male , Female , Osteoarthritis/psychology , Osteoarthritis/complications , Middle Aged , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hand Joints/diagnostic imaging , Hand Joints/physiopathology , Longitudinal Studies , Arthralgia/psychology , Arthralgia/physiopathology , Latent Class Analysis , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Individuals with chronic pain due to knee osteoarthritis (OA) are insufficiently physically active, and alterations of facilitatory and inhibitory nociceptive signaling are common in this population. Our objective was to examine the association of these alterations in nociceptive signaling with objective accelerometer-based measures of physical activity in a large observational cohort. DESIGN: We used data from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study. Measures of peripheral and central pain sensitivity included pressure pain threshold at the knee and mechanical temporal summation at the wrist, respectively. The presence of descending pain inhibition was assessed by conditioned pain modulation (CPM). Physical activity was quantitatively assessed over 7 days using a lower back-worn activity monitor. Summary metrics included steps/day, activity intensity, and sedentary time. Linear regression analyses were used to evaluate the association of pain sensitivity and the presence of descending pain inhibition with physical activity measures. RESULTS: Data from 1873 participants was analyzed (55.9% female, age = 62.8 ± 10.0 years). People having greater peripheral and central sensitivity showed lower step counts. CPM was not significantly related to any of the physical activity measures, and none of the exposures were significantly related to sedentary time. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, greater peripheral and central sensitivity were associated with reduced levels of objectively-assessed daily step counts. Further research may investigate ways to modify or treat heightened pain sensitivity as a means to increase physical activity in older adults with knee OA.
Subject(s)
Exercise , Osteoarthritis, Knee , Pain Threshold , Humans , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/complications , Aged , Pain Threshold/physiology , Exercise/physiology , Pain Measurement , Chronic Pain/physiopathology , Accelerometry , Arthralgia/physiopathologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with patellofemoral osteoar-thritis (PFOA) treated non-operatively with those treated operatively with an unloading anteromedialization tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO). METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients with isolated PFOA who were either managed non-operatively or surgically with a TTO and who had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patients were surveyed with the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR), Anterior Knee Pain scale (Kujala), and Tegner Activity scale. Statistical analysis included two-sample t-testing, one-way ANOVA, and bivariate analysis. RESULTS: The clinical outcomes of 49 non-operatively managed patients (mean age: 52.7 ± 11.3 years; mean follow-up: 1.7 ± 1.0 years) and 35 operatively managed patients (mean age: 31.8 ± 9.4 years; mean follow-up: 3.5 ± 1.7 years) were assessed. The mean VAS improved sig-nificantly in both groups [6.12 to 4.22 (non-operative), p < 0.0001; 6.94 to 2.45 (TTO); p < 0.0001], with operatively treated patients having significantly lower postoperative pain than non-operatively managed patients at the time of final follow-up [2.45 (TTO) vs. 4.22 (non-operative), p < 0.001]. The mean KOOS-JR score was significantly greater in the operative group at time of final follow-up [78.7 ± 11.6 (TTO) vs. 71.7 ± 17.8 (non-operative), p = 0.035]. There was no significant difference in Kujala or Tegner scores between the treatment groups. Additionally, there was no sig-nificant relationship between the number of intra-articular injections, duration of NSAID use, and number of physical therapy sessions on clinical outcomes in the non-operatively treated group (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: An unloading anteromedialization TTO provides significantly better pain relief and restoration of function compared to non-operative management in the treatment of symptomatic PFOA.
Subject(s)
Osteoarthritis, Knee , Osteotomy , Pain Measurement , Tibia , Humans , Osteotomy/methods , Osteotomy/adverse effects , Female , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Male , Treatment Outcome , Adult , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Tibia/surgery , Tibia/physiopathology , Patellofemoral Joint/surgery , Patellofemoral Joint/physiopathology , Recovery of Function , Arthralgia/etiology , Arthralgia/diagnosis , Arthralgia/surgery , Arthralgia/physiopathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Knee pain is a prominent concern among older individuals, influenced by the central nervous system. This study aimed to translate the Central Aspects of Pain in the Knee (CAP-Knee) questionnaire into Japanese and investigate its reliability and validity in older Japanese individuals with knee pain. METHODS: Using a forward-backward method, CAP-Knee was translated into Japanese, and data from 110 patients at an orthopedic clinic were analyzed. The Japanese version (CAP-Knee-J) was evaluated regarding pain intensity during walking, central sensitization inventory, and pain catastrophizing scale. Statistical analyses confirmed internal validity and test-retest reliability. Concurrent validity was assessed through a single correlation analysis between CAP-Knee-J and the aforementioned measures. Exploratory factor analysis was employed on each CAP-Knee-J item to examine structural validity. RESULTS: CAP-Knee-J showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.86) and excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.77). It correlated significantly with pain intensity while walking, central sensitization inventory scores, and pain catastrophizing scale scores. Exploratory factor analysis produced a three-factor model. CONCLUSIONS: CAP-Knee-J is a reliable and valid questionnaire for assessing central pain mechanisms specific to knee pain in older Japanese individuals, with moderate correlations with the CSI and weak with the PCS, thus indicating construct validity. This study supports the development of effective knee pain treatments and prognosis predictions.
Subject(s)
Pain Measurement , Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Pain Measurement/methods , Japan , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Arthralgia/diagnosis , Arthralgia/psychology , Arthralgia/physiopathology , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Catastrophization/psychology , Catastrophization/diagnosis , East Asian PeopleABSTRACT
AIM: Many rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients prioritize pain improvement in treatment. As pain can result from various causes, including noninflammatory factors such as central sensitivity syndrome (CSS), we hypothesized that CSS might impact treatment satisfaction. In this cross-sectional study, we assessed the CSS effects on clinical disease activity and treatment satisfaction in RA patients. METHODS: In total, 220 consecutive RA patients receiving long-term follow-up were evaluated for clinical disease activity and treatment satisfaction. CSS was evaluated using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). An overall score of ≥40 indicates the presence of CSS. We queried "How satisfied are you with your treatment?"; answers included (a) very satisfied, (b) satisfied, (c) not satisfied, or (d) very dissatisfied. For univariate analysis, we condensed these answers into "dissatisfied" or "satisfied." We also evaluated treatment satisfaction using the visual analog scale (VAS), with scores ranging from 0 mm (very dissatisfied) to 100 mm (very satisfied). RESULTS: Of the 220 patients, 17 (7.7%) were classified as having CSS. CSI score was significantly correlated with the clinical disease activity index (CDAI; r = .322, p < .01) and treatment satisfaction (r = -.336, p < .01). Regarding treatment satisfaction, univariate analysis revealed that patient global assessment (PtGA), pain VAS, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Disease Activity Score in 28 joints with C-reactive protein, CDAI, and CSI scores of patients who were satisfied with treatment differed significantly from those of dissatisfied patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that CSI, PtGA, and HAQ-DI scores were associated with treatment satisfaction. CONCLUSION: In RA patients, CSS may affect the disease activity index and reduce treatment satisfaction.
Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Pain Measurement , Patient Satisfaction , Severity of Illness Index , Humans , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/physiopathology , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/psychology , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Central Nervous System Sensitization , Adult , Time Factors , Arthralgia/physiopathology , Arthralgia/diagnosis , Arthralgia/psychology , Arthralgia/therapySubject(s)
Exercise Therapy , Osteoarthritis, Knee , Platelet-Rich Plasma , Humans , Osteoarthritis, Knee/therapy , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Exercise Therapy/methods , Middle Aged , Male , Female , Treatment Outcome , Pain Measurement , Aged , Combined Modality Therapy , Recovery of Function , Arthralgia/physiopathology , Arthralgia/therapy , Arthralgia/etiology , Arthralgia/diagnosis , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Knee Joint/surgeryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To explore associations between hip muscle strength and cartilage defects (presence and severity) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in young adults with hip/groin pain participating in sub-elite football. DESIGN: Sub-elite football players with hip/groin pain (>6 months) completed assessments of isometric hip strength and functional task performance. Hip cartilage defects were assessed using the Scoring Hip Osteoarthritis with MRI tool. This exploratory, cross-sectional study used logistic and negative binomial models to assess the relationships between hip muscle strength or functional task performance and hip cartilage defects, controlling for body mass index, age, testing site and cam morphology, incorporating sex-specific interaction terms. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-two (37 women) sub-elite (soccer or Australian football) players with hip/groin pain (age 26 ± 7 years) were included. Greater hip extension strength was associated with higher cartilage total score (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] 1.01, 95%CI: 1.0 to 1.02, p = 0.013) and superolateral cartilage score (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01 to 1.06, p < 0.01). In female sub-elite football players, greater hip external rotation strength was associated with lateral cartilage defects (aOR 1.61, 95%CI: 1.05 to 2.48, p = 0.03) and higher cartilage total score (aIRR 1.25, 95%CI: 1.01 to 1.66, p = 0.042). A one-repetition increase in one-leg rise performance was related to lower odds of superomedial cartilage defects (aOR 0.96, 95%CI: 0.94 to 0.99, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there were few associations between peak isometric hip muscle strength and overall hip cartilage defects. It is possible that other factors may have relevance in sub-elite football players. Additional studies are needed to support or refute our findings that higher one leg rise performance was associated with reduced superomedial cartilage defect severity and greater hip extension strength was related to higher cartilage defect severity scores.
Subject(s)
Cartilage, Articular , Hip Joint , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Muscle Strength , Soccer , Humans , Male , Female , Muscle Strength/physiology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Cartilage, Articular/diagnostic imaging , Cartilage, Articular/physiopathology , Young Adult , Hip Joint/physiopathology , Hip Joint/diagnostic imaging , Groin/physiopathology , Arthralgia/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Hip/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Hip/diagnostic imaging , AdolescentABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Psychosocial function of Chinese temporomandibular disorders (TMD) pain patients and the correlation with somatosensory function has not been sufficiently studied. OBJECTIVE: The study aims at assessing the psychosocial function of Chinese TMD pain patients by visualisation method and evaluating the correlations with somatosensory function quantitatively. METHODS: The Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90) questionnaire and standardised quantitative sensory testing (QST) were administered to 70 Chinese TMD pain patients and age- and gender-matched healthy controls (HCs). Of these, 40 TMD arthralgia patients received QST before and after medication. Psychosocial and somatosensory parameters were transformed into standardised scores. Differences within groups were assessed through t tests. Correlations between psychosocial and somatosensory profiles were explored through correlation analyses with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: 100% of the Chinese TMD pain patients exhibited psychosocial distress in contrast to HCs. Anger and hostility showed negative correlation with the thermal nonnociceptive parameter (thermal sensory limen, p =.002) and nociceptive parameters (cold pain threshold and pain pressure threshold, p<.001). Correlation analysis indicated that cold detection threshold was negatively correlated with somatization and mechanical pain sensitivity had a negative correlation with anger and hostility through medical treatment (p <.001). CONCLUSIONS: Visual psychosocial profiles provided an easy overview of psychosocial function in Chinese TMD pain patients. Anger and hostility was associated with increased thermal nonnociceptive and nociceptive sensitivity to stimuli. Psychosocial distress might be negatively associated with TMD treatment response which indicated a possible need for psychological intervention during treatment.
Subject(s)
Pain Measurement , Pain Threshold , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders , Humans , Female , Male , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/physiopathology , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/psychology , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/complications , Adult , Pain Threshold/physiology , Pain Threshold/psychology , Case-Control Studies , China , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult , Facial Pain/physiopathology , Facial Pain/psychology , Middle Aged , Hostility , Arthralgia/psychology , Arthralgia/physiopathology , Anger/physiology , East Asian PeopleABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify gait alterations related to worsening knee pain and worsening physical function, using machine learning approaches applied to wearable sensor-derived data from a large observational cohort. METHODS: Participants in the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST) completed a 20-m walk test wearing inertial sensors on their lower back and ankles. Parameters describing spatiotemporal features of gait were extracted from these data. We used an ensemble machine learning technique ("super learning") to optimally discriminate between those with and without worsening physical function and, separately, those with and without worsening pain over two years. We then used log-binomial regression to evaluate associations of the top 10 influential variables selected with super learning with each outcome. We also assessed whether the relation of altered gait with worsening function was mediated by changes in pain. RESULTS: Of 2,324 participants, 29% and 24% had worsening knee pain and function over two years, respectively. From the super learner, several gait parameters were found to be influential for worsening pain and for worsening function. After adjusting for confounders, greater gait asymmetry, longer average step length, and lower dominant frequency were associated with worsening pain, and lower cadence was associated with worsening function. Worsening pain partially mediated the association of cadence with function. CONCLUSION: We identified gait alterations associated with worsening knee pain and those associated with worsening physical function. These alterations could be assessed with wearable sensors in clinical settings. Further research should determine whether they might be therapeutic targets to prevent worsening pain and worsening function.
Subject(s)
Arthralgia , Gait , Machine Learning , Osteoarthritis, Knee , Wearable Electronic Devices , Humans , Female , Male , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Aged , Middle Aged , Gait/physiology , Arthralgia/physiopathology , Arthralgia/diagnosis , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Pain Measurement , Disease Progression , Functional Status , Walk Test , Gait Analysis/instrumentation , United States/epidemiology , Predictive Value of TestsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Patients with chronic pain disorders, including Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs) endorse high levels of sleep disturbances, frequently reporting reduced sleep quality. Despite this, little is known about the effect that daytime pain has on the microstructure and macro-architecture of sleep. Therefore, we aimed to examine the extent to which daytime pain sensitivity, measured using quantitative sensory testing (QST), is associated with objective sleep parameters the following night, including sleep architecture and power spectral density, in women with TMD. METHODS: 144 females with myalgia and arthralgia by examination using the Diagnostic criteria for TMD completed a comprehensive QST battery consisting of General Pain Sensitivity, Central Sensitization Index, and Masseter Pressure Pain Threshold assessments. Polysomnography was collected the same night to measure sleep architecture and calculate relative power in delta, theta, alpha, sigma, and beta power bands. RESULTS: Central Sensitization (B = -3.069, P = .009), General Pain Sensitivity Indices (B = -3.069, P = .007), and Masseter Pain Pressure Threshold (B = 0.030, P = .008) were significantly associated with lower REM% both before and after controlling for covariates. Pain sensitivity measures were not significantly associated with relative power in any of the spectral bands nor with any other sleep architectural stages. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that higher generalized pain sensitivity, masseter pain pressure threshold, as well as central sensitization were associated with a lower percentage of REM in participants with myofascial pain and arthralgia of the masticatory system. These findings provide an important step toward understanding the mechanistic underpinnings of how chronic pain interacts with sleep physiology.
Subject(s)
Pain Threshold , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders , Sleep, REM , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders , Humans , Female , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/physiopathology , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/epidemiology , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/complications , Adult , Pain Threshold/physiology , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/physiopathology , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Sleep, REM/physiology , Polysomnography , Young Adult , Central Nervous System Sensitization/physiology , Comorbidity , Pain Measurement/methods , Arthralgia/physiopathologyABSTRACT
Disability due to iliopsoas (IP) pain and dysfunction is underdiagnosed in the athletic population. The IP unit consists of the psoas major and iliacus muscles converging to form the IP tendon and is responsible primarily for hip flexion strength but has a number of secondary contributions such as femoral movement, trunk rotation, core stabilization, and dynamic anterior stability to the hip joint. As the IP passes in front of the anterior acetabulum and labrum, the diagnosis of IP pain may be confused with labral tearing seen on magnetic resonance imaging. This is in addition to the low sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging to detect IP tendinitis and bursitis. Resisted seated hip flexion as well as direct palpation of the IP tendon and muscle belly are useful to assess function and help determine whether the IP may be the source of pain, which is common in athletes. Both biomechanical and clinical investigations have demonstrated the role of IP as an anterior hip stabilizer. Patients with signs of hip microinstability, developmental dysplasia of the hip, and increased femoral anteversion are at risk of IP pain and poor outcomes after IP lengthening, highlighting the importance of the IP in providing dynamic anterior hip stability.
Subject(s)
Hip Joint , Psoas Muscles , Humans , Psoas Muscles/diagnostic imaging , Psoas Muscles/physiopathology , Hip Joint/physiopathology , Hip Joint/diagnostic imaging , Athletes , Arthralgia/etiology , Arthralgia/physiopathology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Biomechanical Phenomena , Tendons/physiopathology , Tendons/anatomy & histology , Tendinopathy/physiopathology , Tendinopathy/diagnostic imaging , Athletic Injuries/physiopathology , Athletic Injuries/diagnosisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis is a leading cause of disability with substantial healthcare costs, and efficient nonsurgical treatment methods are still needed. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections and exercise therapy are used frequently in clinical practice. Whether PRP or PRP combined with exercise is more effective than exercise alone is unclear. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Which treatment relieves knee osteoarthritis pain better: PRP alone, exercise, or PRP combined with exercise? (2) Does PRP alone, exercise, or PRP combined with exercise yield better results in terms of the WOMAC score, performance on the 40-m fast-paced walk test and stair climbing test, and the SF-12 health-related quality of life score? METHODS: In this randomized, controlled, three-arm clinical trial, we recruited patients with mild-to-moderate (Kellgren-Lawrence Grade II or III) knee osteoarthritis with a minimum of 3 points on the 11-point numeric rating scale for pain. During the study period, 157 patients with a diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis were screened and 84 eligible volunteers were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1:1) into either the exercise group (28), PRP group (28), or PRP + exercise group (28). Follow-up proportions were similar between the groups (exercise: 89% [25], PRP: 86% [24], PRP + exercise: 89% [25]; p = 0.79). All patients were analyzed in an intention-to-treat manner. There were no between-group differences in age, gender, arthritis severity, and baseline clinical scores (pain, WOMAC, functional performance tests, and health-related quality of life). The exercise group underwent a 6-week structured program consisting of 12 supervised individual sessions focused on strengthening and functional exercises. Meanwhile, the PRP group received three weekly injections of fresh, leukocyte-poor PRP. The PRP + exercise group received a combined treatment with both interventions. The primary outcome was knee pain over 24 weeks, measured on an 11-point numeric rating scale for pain (ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst pain, with a minimum clinically important difference [MCID] of 2). The secondary outcome measures included the WOMAC index (ranging from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating a lower level of disability and an MCID of 12), the durations of the 40-meter fast-paced walk test and stair climbing test, and the SF-12 health-related quality of life score. For the a priori sample size calculation, we used the numeric rating scale score for pain at 24 weeks as the primary outcome variable. The MCID for the numeric rating scale was deemed to be 2 points, with an estimated standard deviation of 2.4. Based on sample size calculations, a sample of 24 patients per group would provide 80% power to detect an effect of this size between the groups at the significance level of p = 0.05. RESULTS: We found no clinically important differences in improvements in pain-defined as ≥ 2 points of 10-at 24 weeks when comparing exercise alone to PRP alone to PRP + exercise (1.9 ± 0.7 versus 3.8 ± 1.8 versus 1.4 ± 0.6; mean difference between PRP + exercise group and exercise group -0.5 [95% confidence interval -1.2 to 0.4]; p = 0.69). Likewise, we found no differences in WOMAC scores at 24 weeks of follow-up when comparing exercise alone to PRP alone to PRP + exercise (10 ± 9 versus 26 ± 20 versus 7 ± 6; mean difference between PRP + exercise group and exercise group -3 [95% CI -12 to -5]; p = 0.97). There were no differences in any of the other secondary outcome metrics among the PRP + exercise and exercise groups. CONCLUSION: PRP did not improve pain at 24 weeks of follow-up in patients with mild-to-moderate knee osteoarthritis compared with exercise alone. Moreover, exercise alone was clinically superior to PRP alone, considering function and the physical component of health-related quality of life. Despite the additional costs and endeavors related to PRP products, the combination of PRP and exercise did not differ from exercise alone. The results of this randomized controlled trial do not support the use of PRP injections in the treatment of patients diagnosed with mild-to-moderate knee osteoarthritis. Consequently, exercise alone is the recommended treatment for reducing pain and enhancing function throughout this timeframe. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study.