Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 4.402
Filter
1.
Epidemiol Prev ; 48(3): 260-264, 2024.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38995141

ABSTRACT

This is a summary of the results of a research work, born from a collaboration between multiple Italian bodies and published by the Italian Workers' Compensation Authority (Inail) in March 2024: Second report on maritime workers. Activities and risk factors of sea workers.To disseminate the contents, the work offers a global overview of safety and health in the sector: with an analysis of accidents in the sector (which also involves some remarks on the event reporting form), workers' risk perception is examined and occupational diseases monitored through the MalProf system, managed by the Inail Research Sector and the local health authorities. Finally, an in-depth study is dedicated to exposure to asbestos on ships.


Subject(s)
Occupational Diseases , Occupational Exposure , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Ships , Accidents, Occupational/statistics & numerical data , Asbestos/adverse effects , Workers' Compensation , Occupational Health
2.
Ann Ist Super Sanita ; 60(2): 118-125, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38984626

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A pooled study on Italian asbestos cement plant cohorts observed mortality risk for asbestos-related diseases. This study analysed the mortality of workers cohort of an asbestos cement plant in Syracuse, Italy. METHODS: Workers' vital status and causes of death, during 1970-2018, were identified in regional health databases. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) by sex and temporal variables were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 900 cohort's subjects (636 men, 259 women, 5 unknown sex), for 867 the vital ascertainment was possible: 505 died during study period. All-cause mortality is similarly to the expected among men and lower among women. Pleural and lung malignant neoplasms (MN) exceeded in men (SMR=27.1, SMR=1.95), retroperitoneal and peritoneal MN in both sexes, no cases of larynx MN were observed. Mortality excess for ovarian MN (SMR=1.5) and asbestosis in both sexes (men: SMR=431.9, women: SMR=116.6) were found. CONCLUSIONS: Exceeding mortality from asbestos-related diseases, particularly in men was highlighted.


Subject(s)
Asbestos , Asbestosis , Construction Materials , Occupational Exposure , Humans , Male , Italy/epidemiology , Female , Asbestos/adverse effects , Asbestosis/mortality , Middle Aged , Cohort Studies , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Aged , Construction Materials/adverse effects , Occupational Diseases/mortality , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Adult , Cause of Death , Pleural Neoplasms/mortality , Pleural Neoplasms/epidemiology , Pleural Neoplasms/etiology
3.
PLoS One ; 19(6): e0298504, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38913645

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Chemical contamination and pollution are an ongoing threat to human health and the environment. The concern over the consequences of chemical exposures at the global level continues to grow. Because resources are constrained, there is a need to prioritize interventions focused on the greatest health impact. Data, especially related to chemical exposures, are rarely available for most substances of concern, and alternate methods to evaluate their impact are needed. STRUCTURED EXPERT JUDGMENT (SEJ) PROCESS: A Structured Expert Judgment (Research Outreach, 2021) process was performed to provide plausible estimates of health impacts for 16 commonly found pollutants: asbestos, arsenic, benzene, chromium, cadmium, dioxins, fluoride, highly hazardous pesticides (HHPs), lead, mercury, polycyclic-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), Per- and Polyfluorinated Substances (PFAs), phthalates, endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs), and brominated flame retardants (BRFs). This process, undertaken by sector experts, weighed individual estimations of the probable global health scale health impacts of each pollutant using objective estimates of the expert opinions' statistical accuracy and informativeness. MAIN FINDINGS: The foremost substances, in terms of mean projected annual total deaths, were lead, asbestos, arsenic, and HHPs. Lead surpasses the others by a large margin, with an estimated median value of 1.7 million deaths annually. The three other substances averaged between 136,000 and 274,000 deaths per year. Of the 12 other chemicals evaluated, none reached an estimated annual death count exceeding 100,000. These findings underscore the importance of prioritizing available resources on reducing and remediating the impacts of these key pollutants. RANGE OF HEALTH IMPACTS: Based on the evidence available, experts concluded some of the more notorious chemical pollutants, such as PCBs and dioxin, do not result in high levels of human health impact from a global scale perspective. However, the chemical toxicity of some compounds released in recent decades, such as Endocrine Disrupters and PFAs, cannot be ignored, even if current impacts are limited. Moreover, the impact of some chemicals may be disproportionately large in some geographic areas. Continued research and monitoring are essential; and a preventative approach is needed for chemicals. FUTURE DIRECTIONS: These results, and potential similar analyses of other chemicals, are provided as inputs to ongoing discussions about priority setting for global chemicals and pollution management. Furthermore, we suggest that this SEJ process be repeated periodically as new information becomes available.


Subject(s)
Environmental Pollutants , Humans , Environmental Pollutants/toxicity , Environmental Pollutants/analysis , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Expert Testimony , Endocrine Disruptors/toxicity , Pesticides/toxicity , Polychlorinated Biphenyls/analysis , Polychlorinated Biphenyls/toxicity , Arsenic/analysis , Arsenic/toxicity , Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons/analysis , Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons/toxicity , Environmental Pollution/analysis , Asbestos/adverse effects , Dioxins/toxicity , Dioxins/analysis
4.
Lung Cancer ; 193: 107828, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38838517

ABSTRACT

All six fiber types called asbestos can cause all the diseases related to exposure, including lung cancer. Known to the ancients, the modern history of asbestos hazards started in the 1890s with more and more data accumulating over time. Use increased exponentially in the middle of the 20th century with major use coming in construction and ship building. The recognition of asbestos as causing lung cancer dates to the early 1940s.


Subject(s)
Asbestos , Lung Neoplasms , Asbestos/adverse effects , Humans , History, 20th Century , Lung Neoplasms/history , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , History, 19th Century , History, 21st Century , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Asbestosis/history , Asbestosis/etiology
5.
Environ Health ; 23(1): 56, 2024 Jun 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38858710

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite significant advancements in treatments such as surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, the survival rate for patients with asbestos-related cancers remains low. Numerous studies have provided evidence suggesting that air pollution induces oxidative stress and inflammation, affecting acute respiratory diseases, lung cancer, and overall mortality. However, because of the high case fatality rate, there is limited knowledge regarding the effects of air pollution exposures on survival following a diagnosis of asbestos-related cancers. This study aimed to determine the effect of air pollution on the survival of patients with malignant mesothelioma and asbestos-related lung cancer. METHODS: We followed up with 593 patients with malignant mesothelioma and 998 patients with lung cancer identified as asbestos victims between 2009 and 2022. Data on five air pollutants-sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, fine particulate matter with a diameter < 10 µm, and fine particulate matter with a diameter < 2.5 µm-were obtained from nationwide atmospheric monitoring stations. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the association of cumulative air pollutant exposure with patient mortality, while adjusting for potential confounders. Quantile-based g-computation was used to assess the combined effect of the air pollutant mixture on mortality. RESULTS: The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates for both cancer types decreased with increasing exposure to all air pollutants. The estimated hazard ratios rose significantly with a 1-standard deviation increase in each pollutant exposure level. A quartile increase in the pollutant mixture was associated with a 1.99-fold increase in the risk of malignant mesothelioma-related mortality (95% confidence interval: 1.62, 2.44). For lung cancer, a quartile increase in the pollutant mixture triggered a 1.87-fold increase in the mortality risk (95% confidence interval: 1.53, 2.30). CONCLUSION: These findings support the hypothesis that air pollution exposure after an asbestos-related cancer diagnosis can negatively affect patient survival.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants , Air Pollution , Lung Neoplasms , Mesothelioma, Malignant , Humans , Male , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Female , Aged , Middle Aged , Mesothelioma, Malignant/mortality , Air Pollutants/adverse effects , Air Pollutants/analysis , Follow-Up Studies , Air Pollution/adverse effects , Asbestos/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Particulate Matter/adverse effects , Particulate Matter/analysis , Aged, 80 and over , Adult , Mesothelioma/mortality , Mesothelioma/epidemiology
7.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 150(5): 282, 2024 May 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38806867

ABSTRACT

Malignant mesothelioma, a rare and aggressive cancer primarily caused by occupational asbestos exposure, has a poor prognosis. This study leverages the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2019 dataset to analyze the burden of mesothelioma linked to occupational asbestos exposure from 1990 to 2019. The analysis includes the number of mesothelioma deaths and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) attributable to occupational asbestos exposure, focusing on trends in age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR) and age-standardized disability-adjusted life-year rate (ASDR) by year, age, sex, country, region, and Socio-demographic Index (SDI). In 2019, 91.7% of mesothelioma deaths and 85.2% of DALYs were attributable to occupational asbestos exposure, resulting in 26,820 (95% UI 24,312-28,622) deaths and 569,429 (95% UI 509,956-617,484) DALYs. Despite a decline in ASMR and ASDR from 1990 to 2019, the absolute number of deaths and DALYs almost doubled. The United States reported the highest number of mesothelioma deaths, while China had the highest number of DALYs. Age-specific mortality rates and DALYs decreased in the 25-74 age group but increased in the 75+ age group. In conclusion, occupational asbestos exposure remains the primary cause of mesothelioma worldwide, with an increasing number of deaths and DALYs. The highest incidence rates are observed in high-income areas, and rates are rising in low-income areas. It is crucial to raise awareness about the hazards of asbestos to reduce the global burden of mesothelioma linked to occupational exposure.


Subject(s)
Asbestos , Global Burden of Disease , Occupational Exposure , Humans , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Asbestos/adverse effects , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Adult , Mesothelioma/epidemiology , Mesothelioma/mortality , Mesothelioma/etiology , Mesothelioma, Malignant/epidemiology , Mesothelioma, Malignant/mortality , Mesothelioma, Malignant/etiology , Disability-Adjusted Life Years , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Aged, 80 and over , Global Health/statistics & numerical data , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/mortality , Occupational Diseases/etiology
8.
Lung Cancer ; 192: 107829, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38810528

ABSTRACT

Asbestos-Related Lung Cancer (ARLC) presents ongoing diagnostic challenges despite improved imaging technologies. The long latency period, coupled with limited access to occupational and environmental data along with the confounding effects of smoking and other carcinogens adds complexity to the diagnostic process. Compounding these challenges is the absence of a specific histopathologic or mutational signature of ARLC. A correlation between PD-L1 expression and response to immune checkpoint inhibition has not yet been proven. Thus, new biomarkers are needed to allow accurate diagnoses of ARLC, to enable prognostication and to offer personalized treatments. Liquid biopsies, encompassing circulating DNA and circulating tumor cells (CTCs), have gained attention as novel diagnostic methods in lung cancer to screen high-risk populations including those exposed to asbestos. CTCs can be enumerated and molecularly profiled to provide predictive and prognostic information. CTC studies have not been undertaken in populations at risk of ARLC to date. The potential of CTCs to provide real-time molecular insight into ARLC biology may significantly improve the diagnosis and management of ARLC patients.


Subject(s)
Asbestos , Biomarkers, Tumor , Early Detection of Cancer , Lung Neoplasms , Neoplastic Cells, Circulating , Humans , Asbestos/adverse effects , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Liquid Biopsy/methods , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Neoplastic Cells, Circulating/pathology , Neoplastic Cells, Circulating/metabolism , Prognosis
9.
Eur Respir J ; 63(6)2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38697647

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This population-based study aimed to identify the risk factors for lung nodules in a Western European general population. METHODS: We quantified the presence or absence of lung nodules among 12 055 participants of the Dutch population-based ImaLife (Imaging in Lifelines) study (age ≥45 years) who underwent low-dose chest computed tomography. Outcomes included the presence of 1) at least one solid lung nodule (volume ≥30 mm3) and 2) a clinically relevant lung nodule (volume ≥100 mm3). Fully adjusted multivariable logistic regression models were applied overall and stratified by smoking status to identify independent risk factors for the presence of nodules. RESULTS: Among the 12 055 participants (44.1% male; median age 60 years; 39.9% never-smokers; 98.7% White), we found lung nodules in 41.8% (5045 out of 12 055) and clinically relevant nodules in 11.4% (1377 out of 12 055); the corresponding figures among never-smokers were 38.8% and 9.5%, respectively. Factors independently associated with increased odds of having any lung nodule included male sex, older age, low educational level, former smoking, asbestos exposure and COPD. Among never-smokers, a family history of lung cancer increased the odds of both lung nodules and clinically relevant nodules. Among former and current smokers, low educational level was positively associated with lung nodules, whereas being overweight was negatively associated. Among current smokers, asbestos exposure and low physical activity were associated with clinically relevant nodules. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides a large-scale evaluation of lung nodules and associated risk factors in a Western European general population: lung nodules and clinically relevant nodules were prevalent, and never-smokers with a family history of lung cancer were a non-negligible group.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms , Smoking , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Risk Factors , Smoking/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Netherlands/epidemiology , Logistic Models , Multiple Pulmonary Nodules/diagnostic imaging , Multiple Pulmonary Nodules/epidemiology , Solitary Pulmonary Nodule/diagnostic imaging , Solitary Pulmonary Nodule/epidemiology , Multivariate Analysis , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/epidemiology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnostic imaging , Asbestos/adverse effects , Lung/diagnostic imaging
10.
Biomed Pharmacother ; 175: 116662, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38692064

ABSTRACT

17-ß-estradiol, involved in mesothelioma pathogenesis, and its precursors were explored as potential biomarkers for the early diagnosis of mesothelioma. Using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA) for 17-ß-estradiol and ultra-high performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry(UHPLC-MS/MS) for 19 17-ß-estradiol precursors, a comprehensive analysis of 20steroid hormones was conducted in the serum of mesothelioma patients(n=67), asbestos-exposed healthy subjects(n=39), and non-asbestos-exposed healthy subjects(n=35). Bioinformatics analysis explored three potential serum biomarkers: 17-ß-estradiol, DHEA-S, and androstenedione. The results revealed significant differences in 17-ß-estradiol levels between mesothelioma patients and both non-asbestos-exposed and asbestos-exposed healthy subjects. No significant variations in serum 17-ß-estradiol levels were observed among mesothelioma patients at different stages, suggesting its potential as an early diagnostic marker. 17-ß-estradiol levels were similar in mesothelioma patients with environmental and occupational asbestos exposure, while males with occupational asbestos exposure exhibited significantly higher levels of 17-ß-estradiol compared to females. Significant reduction in androstenedione and an increase in DHEA-S were observed in asbestos-exposed individuals compared to non-asbestos-exposed individuals. The analysis of DHEA-S-androstenedione-17-ß-estradiol signature score showed an increase in asbestos-exposed individuals and mesothelioma patients compared to non-asbestos-exposed individuals, and this score effectively distinguished between the groups. The Cancer Genome Atlas data was utilized to analyze the expression of 5-α-reductase1 and hydroxysteroid-17ß-dehydrogenase2 genes. The findings indicated that mesothelioma patients with elevated gene values for 5-α-reductase1 and hydroxysteroid-17ß-dehydrogenase2 have a worse or better prognosis on overall survival, respectively. In conclusion, this study suggests 17-ß-estradiol, DHEA-S, and androstenedione as biomarkers for mesothelioma risk and early diagnosis of mesothelioma in asbestos-exposed individuals, aiding timely intervention and improved care.


Subject(s)
Androstenedione , Asbestos , Biomarkers, Tumor , Estradiol , Lung Neoplasms , Mesothelioma, Malignant , Occupational Exposure , Humans , Estradiol/blood , Male , Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Androstenedione/blood , Asbestos/toxicity , Asbestos/adverse effects , Female , Middle Aged , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Aged , Mesothelioma, Malignant/blood , Mesothelioma, Malignant/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/blood , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Mesothelioma/blood , Mesothelioma/diagnosis , Mesothelioma/chemically induced , Pleural Neoplasms/blood , Pleural Neoplasms/diagnosis , Pleural Neoplasms/chemically induced , Dehydroepiandrosterone/blood , Case-Control Studies , Early Detection of Cancer/methods
11.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 5: CD015158, 2024 05 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38695617

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Asbestos exposure can lead to asbestos-related diseases. The European Union (EU) has adopted regulations for workplaces where asbestos is present. The EU occupational exposure limit (OEL) for asbestos is 0.1 fibres per cubic centimetre of air (f/cm3) as an eight-hour average. Different types of personal protective equipment (PPE) are available to provide protection and minimise exposure; however, their effectiveness is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of personal protective equipment (PPE), including donning and doffing procedures and individual hygienic behaviour, compared to no availability and use of such equipment or alternative equipment, on asbestos exposure in workers in asbestos demolition and repair work. SEARCH METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Scopus (September 2022), and we checked the reference lists of included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included studies that measured asbestos concentration outside and inside PPE (considering outside concentration a surrogate for no PPE), exposure to asbestos after doffing PPE, donning and doffing errors, nonadherence to regulations, and adverse effects of PPE. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors selected studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using ROBINS-I. We categorised PPE as full-face filtering masks, supplied air respirators (SARs), and powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs). Values for asbestos outside and inside PPE were transformed to logarithmic values for random-effects meta-analysis. Pooled logarithmic mean differences (MDs) were exponentiated to obtain the ratio of means (RoM) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The RoM shows the degree of protection provided by the respirators (workplace protection factor). Since the RoM is likely to be much higher at higher outside concentrations, we presented separate results according to the outside asbestos concentration, as follows. • Below 0.01 f/cm3 (band 1) • 0.01 f/cm3 to below 0.1 f/cm3 (band 2) • 0.1 f/cm3 to below 1 f/cm3 (band 3) • 1 f/cm3 to below 10 f/cm3 (band 4) • 10 f/cm3 to below 100 f/cm3 (band 5) • 100 f/cm3 to below 1000 f/cm3 (band 6) Additionally, we determined whether the inside concentrations per respirator and concentration band complied with the current EU OEL (0.1 f/cm3) and proposed EU OEL (0.01 f/cm3). MAIN RESULTS: We identified six studies that measured asbestos concentrations outside and inside respiratory protective equipment (RPE) and one cross-over study that compared the effect of two different coveralls on body temperature. No studies evaluated the remaining predefined outcomes. Most studies were at overall moderate risk of bias due to insufficient reporting. The cross-over study was at high risk of bias. Full-face filtering masks Two studies evaluated full-face filtering masks. They provided insufficient data for band 1 and band 6. The results for the remaining bands were as follows. • Band 2: RoM 19 (95% CI 17.6 to 20.1; 1 study, 3 measurements; moderate certainty) • Band 3: RoM 69 (95% CI 26.6 to 175.9; 2 studies, 17 measurements; very low certainty) • Band 4: RoM 455 (95% CI 270.4 to 765.1; 1 study, 16 measurements; low certainty) • Band 5: RoM 2752 (95% CI 1236.5 to 6063.2;1 study, 3 measurements; low certainty) The inside measurements in band 5 did not comply with the EU OEL of 0.1 f/cm3, and no inside measurements complied with the proposed EU OEL of 0.01 f/cm3. Supplied air respirators Two studies evaluated supplied air respirators. They provided no data for band 6. The results for the remaining bands were as follows. • Band 1: RoM 11 (95% CI 7.6 to 14.9; 1 study, 134 measurements; moderate certainty) • Band 2: RoM 63 (95% CI 43.8 to 90.9; 1 study, 17 measurements; moderate certainty) • Band 3: RoM 528 (95% CI 368.7 to 757.5; 1 study, 38 measurements; moderate certainty) • Band 4: RoM 4638 (95% CI 3071.7 to 7044.5; 1 study, 49 measurements; moderate certainty) • Band 5: RoM 26,134 (16,647.2 to 41,357.1; 1 study, 22 measurements; moderate certainty) All inside measurements complied with the current OEL of 0.1 f/cm3 and the proposed OEL of 0.01 f/cm3. Powered air-purifying respirators Three studies evaluated PAPRs. The results per band were as follows. • Band 1: RoM 8 (95% CI 3.7 to 19.1; 1 study, 23 measurements; moderate certainty) • Band 2: RoM 90 (95% CI 64.7 to 126.5; 1 study, 17 measurements; moderate certainty) • Band 3: RoM 104 (95% CI 23.1 to 464.1; 3 studies, 14 measurements; very low certainty) • Band 4: RoM 706 (95% CI 219.2 to 2253.0; 2 studies, 43 measurements; very low certainty) • Band 5: RoM 1366 (544.6 to 3428.9; 2 studies, 8 measurements; low certainty) • Band 6: RoM 18,958 (95% CI 4023.9 to 90,219.4; 2 studies, 13 measurements; very low certainty) All inside measurements complied with the 0.1 f/cm3 OEL when the outside concentration was below 10 f/cm3 (band 1 to band 4). From band 3, no measurements complied with the proposed OEL of 0.01 f/cm3. Different types of coveralls One study reported the adverse effects of coveralls. A polyethylene suit may increase the body temperature more than a ventilated impermeable polyvinyl (PVC) coverall, but the evidence is very uncertain (MD 0.17 °C, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.42; 1 study, 11 participants; very low certainty). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Where the outside asbestos concentration is below 0.1 f/cm3, SARS and PAPRs likely reduce exposure to below the proposed OEL of 0.01 f/cm3. For outside concentrations up to 10 f/cm3, all respirators may reduce exposure below the current OEL, but only SAR also below the proposed OEL. In band 5 (10 to < 100 f/cm3), full-face filtering masks may not reduce asbestos exposure below either OEL, SARs likely reduce exposure below both OELs, and there were no data for PAPRs. In band 6 (100 f/cm3 to < 1000 f/cm3), PAPRs may not reduce exposure below either OEL, and there were no data for full-face filtering masks or SARs. Some coveralls may increase body temperature more than others. Randomised studies are needed to directly compare PAPRs and SARs at higher asbestos concentrations and to assess adverse effects. Future studies should assess the effects of doffing procedures.


Subject(s)
Asbestos , Occupational Exposure , Personal Protective Equipment , Humans , Asbestos/analysis , Asbestos/adverse effects , Bias , Masks , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Respiratory Protective Devices
12.
Med Lav ; 115(2): e2024016, 2024 Apr 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38686579

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recent studies supported the association between occupational exposure to asbestos and risk of cholangiocarcinoma (CC). Aim of the present study is to investigate this association using an update of mortality data from the Italian pooled asbestos cohort study and to test record linkage to Cancer Registries to distinguish between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic/extrahepatic forms of CC. METHODS: The update of a large cohort study pooling 52 Italian industrial cohorts of workers formerly exposed to asbestos was carried out. Causes of death were coded according to ICD. Linkage was carried out for those subjects who died for liver or bile duct cancer with data on histological subtype provided by Cancer Registries. RESULTS: 47 cohorts took part in the study (57,227 subjects). We identified 639 causes of death for liver and bile duct cancer in the 44 cohorts covered by Cancer Registry. Of these 639, 240 cases were linked to Cancer Registry, namely 14 CC, 83 HCC, 117 cases with unspecified histology, 25 other carcinomas, and one case of cirrhosis (likely precancerous condition). Of the 14 CC, 12 occurred in 2010-2019, two in 2000-2009, and none before 2000. CONCLUSION: Further studies are needed to explore the association between occupational exposure to asbestos and CC. Record linkage was hampered due to incomplete coverage of the study areas and periods by Cancer Registries. The identification of CC among unspecific histology cases is fundamental to establish more effective and targeted liver cancer screening strategies.


Subject(s)
Asbestos , Bile Duct Neoplasms , Cholangiocarcinoma , Occupational Diseases , Occupational Exposure , Humans , Cholangiocarcinoma/epidemiology , Cholangiocarcinoma/etiology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Italy/epidemiology , Bile Duct Neoplasms/epidemiology , Bile Duct Neoplasms/etiology , Male , Asbestos/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Liver Neoplasms/epidemiology , Liver Neoplasms/etiology , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/etiology , Registries
13.
Radiologia (Engl Ed) ; 66 Suppl 1: S3-S9, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38642958

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mesothelioma is an infrequent neoplasm with a poor prognosis that is related to exposure to asbestos and whose peak incidence in Europe is estimated from 2020. Its diagnosis is complex; imaging techniques and the performance of invasive pleural techniques being essential for pathological confirmation. The different diagnostic yields of these invasive techniques are collected in the medical literature. The present work consisted of reviewing how the definitive diagnosis of mesothelioma cases in our centre was reached to check if there was concordance with the data in the bibliography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with a diagnosis of pleural mesothelioma in the period 2019-2021, analysing demographic data and exposure to asbestos, the semiology of the radiological findings and the invasive techniques performed to reach the diagnosis. RESULTS: Twenty-six mesothelioma cases were reviewed. 22 men and 4 women. Median age 74 years. 9 patients had a history of asbestos exposure. Moderate-severe pleural effusion was the most frequent radiological finding (23/26). The sensitivity of the invasive techniques was as follows: Cytology 13%, biopsy without image guidance 11%, image-guided biopsy 93%, surgical biopsy 67%. CONCLUSIONS: In our review, pleural biopsy performed with image guidance was the test that had the highest diagnostic yield, so it should be considered as the initial invasive test for the study of mesothelioma.


Subject(s)
Asbestos , Mesothelioma , Pleural Effusion , Pleural Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Female , Aged , Mesothelioma/diagnostic imaging , Mesothelioma/etiology , Pleural Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Pleural Neoplasms/etiology , Asbestos/adverse effects , Pleural Effusion/chemically induced , Pleural Effusion/complications , Pleural Effusion/pathology , Diagnostic Imaging
15.
Ann Work Expo Health ; 68(5): 476-485, 2024 Jun 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38532179

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: In Italy, the highest pleural cancer mortality and incidence have been observed among Italian regions where the 2 largest Italian shipyards were (and are) located. The objective of this study was to assess the exposure-response relationship for mesothelioma among male workers employed in the Monfalcone, Italy, shipyard. METHODS: We conducted a necropsy-based case-control study. Cases (N = 102) were mesothelioma decedents and controls were those with lung cancer (N = 84). Complete job histories were available; the lung fibre content was measured using a scanning electron microscope with X-ray fluorescence, after sample preparation according to the European Respiratory Society guidelines. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of mesothelioma by fibre type and lung fibre burden, as a categorical or continuous variable, were assessed by unconditional logistic regression, adjusted for age and time since exposure cessation. Analyses for the amphibole and chrysotile lung fibre burden were mutually adjusted. We calculated a cumulative exposure index by applying a job-exposure matrix to the job histories of study cases and assessed its correlation with the lung fibre burden. RESULTS: We found an odds ratio of 22.0 (confidence intervals 5.66-85.7) for the highest lung fibre burden category (mean 43.8 million total asbestos fibres per gram of dry tissue) compared with the reference (mean 0.48). Using log10-transformed lung fibre burden, we found that the odds ratio was 3.71 (confidence intervals 2.03-6.79) for a 10-fold lung fibre burden increase. Results for the amphibole lung fibre burden were similar. Odds ratios increased over chrysotile lung fibre burden categories (P-trend = 0.025), and the odds ratio for a 10-fold increase was 4.73 (confidence intervals 0.32-70.4). CONCLUSIONS: The cumulative exposure index was correlated with total and amphibole lung fibre burden, but not with chrysotile lung fibre burden. Mesothelioma risk was proportional to total, amphibole, and chrysotile lung fibre burden in shipyard workers.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms , Mesothelioma, Malignant , Mesothelioma , Occupational Exposure , Ships , Humans , Male , Case-Control Studies , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Mesothelioma/pathology , Mesothelioma/etiology , Mesothelioma/epidemiology , Italy/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Aged , Mineral Fibers/analysis , Mineral Fibers/adverse effects , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Lung/pathology , Pleural Neoplasms/etiology , Pleural Neoplasms/pathology , Pleural Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adult , Odds Ratio , Autopsy , Asbestos/analysis , Asbestos/adverse effects , Asbestos, Amphibole/analysis , Asbestos, Amphibole/adverse effects , Asbestos, Serpentine/analysis , Asbestos, Serpentine/adverse effects , Risk Factors
16.
Ann Ig ; 36(5): 525-536, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38465395

ABSTRACT

Background: Asbestos is a foremost occupational carcinogen globally. Despite the prohibition under Law 257/1992, Italy persists as one of the European nations most burdened by asbestos-related diseases (ARDs). This research assessed ARD cases in asbestos-exposed workers from the Province of Palermo, Italy, spanning 2010-2021. Methods: Data acquisition utilized the epidemiological dataset from the 'Service of Prevention and Safety on Work Environment' under the Prevention Department of Palermo's Local Health Authority (LHA). Results: Between 2010 and 2021, we identified 245 ARD instances, comprising 163 Asbestosis/Pleural plaques, 41 Lung Cancers, 38 Mesotheliomas, and 3 unspecified cases. Multivariate analysis indicated a notable decline in temporal exposure for mesothelioma (HR=0.933; 95% CI=0.902-0.965) and lung cancer (HR=0.93; 95% CI=0.90-0.978) relative to pleural plaques/asbestosis. Tobacco use displayed a pronounced correlation with lung cancer (smoker HR=64.520 95% CI=13,075-318.390; former smoker HR=20.917 95% CI=4,913-89.048). A significant link was observed between mesothelioma and pleural plaques/asbestosis in those employed in shipbuilding and repair (HR=0.371 95% CI=0.155-0.892). Conclusions: ARDs persist in clinical observations, even following the 1992 cessation of asbestos-related activities, emphasizing an enduring public health challenge. Enhancing prevention strategies is paramount, focusing on amplifying anamnestic and occupational data collection, thereby facilitating superior early diagnosis strategies for these maladies in the occupationally exposed cohort.


Subject(s)
Asbestos , Asbestosis , Lung Neoplasms , Occupational Diseases , Occupational Exposure , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Asbestosis/epidemiology , Asbestosis/etiology , Asbestos/adverse effects , Male , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Middle Aged , Female , Aged , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Mesothelioma/epidemiology , Mesothelioma/etiology , Adult , Time Factors , Pleural Neoplasms/epidemiology , Pleural Neoplasms/etiology , Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking/adverse effects
17.
Eur J Cancer Prev ; 33(5): 438-447, 2024 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38502527

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Navy personnel and seafarers live and work 24 h per day in the shipboard environment and they are exposed to asbestos fibers released into the confined spaces aboard ships. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the mesothelioma risk of seamen working aboard ships, either commercial or naval vessels, as compared to that of the general population. METHODS: We carried out a literature search in MEDLINE through PubMed and EMBASE, from inception to 31 December 2021, of all studies on seamen working aboard ships, either commercial or naval vessels, characterized by exposure to asbestos and providing mesothelioma risk estimates. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of the studies included. The pooled standardized mortality ratio (SMR) was computed across eligible studies. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO and reporting followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 10 studies published from 1990 to 2020 were considered eligible and included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. All the included studies were of good quality, with a median score of seven out of nine. Overall, there were 235 mesothelioma cases/deaths in the included studies versus 115.6 expected, with a pooled SMR of 2.11 (95% confidence intervals, 1.70-2.62), in the absence of a significant between-study heterogeneity ( I2  = 39%, P  = 0.11). CONCLUSION: A more than double excess risk for mesothelioma among seamen working aboard ships emerged from our meta-analysis.


Subject(s)
Asbestos , Mesothelioma , Occupational Exposure , Ships , Humans , Mesothelioma/epidemiology , Mesothelioma/mortality , Mesothelioma/etiology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Asbestos/adverse effects , Asbestos/toxicity , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Occupational Diseases/mortality , Military Personnel/statistics & numerical data
18.
J Formos Med Assoc ; 123(7): 796-801, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38326151

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nephrite is an asbestos mineral composed of tremolite and actinolite. Fengtian is a community where nephrite was mined between 1970 and 1980 and asbestos was mined between 1960 and 1985. The lung cancer risk to the surrounding community is unknown. AIMS: To analyse the trend of lung cancer caused by environmental contamination from nephrite mining. METHODS: We conducted a field survey of nephrite mines and tracked new cases of lung cancer from 1980 to 2019. We calculated the age-standardized incidence rates (ASIRs) and applied join-point regression to examine the lung cancer trend. We assessed the age effect, period effect, and birth cohort effect on lung cancer risk. RESULTS: The nephrite mines were contaminated with chrysotile and tremolite/actinolite asbestos. A total of 278 new cases of lung cancer were reported during the study period. There was an apparent age effect and a slight period effect for lung cancer. After adjustment for the age and period effects, the birth cohort born between 1970 and 1980 during the period of nephrite mass production had the highest relative risk compared with other birth cohorts. The ASIR of lung cancer increased significantly from 1980 to 2010 (the annual percentage change = 6.8 %, 95 % CI: 4.0-9.7 %, P < 0.01) and then decreased 30 years after the cessation of nephrite jade mining. CONCLUSION: Nephrite mining increases the risk of lung cancer in nearby communities.


Subject(s)
Environmental Exposure , Lung Neoplasms , Mining , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/chemically induced , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Aged , Taiwan/epidemiology , Adult , Incidence , Asbestos/adverse effects , Asbestos, Amphibole/adverse effects , Aged, 80 and over
20.
Scand J Work Environ Health ; 50(2): 53-60, 2024 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38323897

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This paper discusses the failure and success of society to decrease the adverse health effects of asbestos exposure on workers' health in relation to scientific knowledge. METHODS: The findings are based on a narrative literature review. RESULTS: Early warnings of the adverse health effects of workplace exposure to asbestos were published already in the 1930s. Serious health effects, such as malignancies and fibrosis due to occupational asbestos exposure, were highlighted in major medical journals and textbooks in late 1960s. New technologies could detect also asbestos fibers in the lung of non-occupational exposed persons in the 1970s. The first bans for using asbestos came in the early 1970s, and more general bans by authorities came in the 1980s and continue until today. CONCLUSIONS: The rather late recognition of adverse effects of asbestos exposure in the general population and measures to decrease the exposure through more general bans came rather late. However, the very strong measures such as general bans in many countries have been a success. A Swedish study showed that the general ban and other measures have decreased the risk of malignancies due to occupational exposure. The effect of the bans on adverse effects in the general population has yet to be studied. Analysis of fibers in the lungs of persons born after the bans could be an efficient method.


Subject(s)
Asbestos , Asbestosis , Lung Neoplasms , Mesothelioma , Neoplasms , Occupational Exposure , Occupational Health , Humans , Public Health , Asbestos/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Mesothelioma/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Asbestosis/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL