ABSTRACT
AIMS: To devise effective preventive measures, a profound understanding of the evolving patterns and trends in atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) burdens is pivotal. Our study was designed to quantify the burden and delineate the risk factors associated with AF and AFL across 204 countries and territories spanning 1990-2021. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data pertaining to AF and AFL were sourced from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. The burden of AF/AFL was evaluated using metrics such as incidence, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), deaths, and their corresponding age-standardized rates (ASRs), stratified by age, sex, socio-demographic index (SDI), and human development index (HDI). The estimated annual percentage change was employed to quantify changes in ASRs. Population attributable fractions were calculated to determine the proportional contributions of major risk factors to age-standardized AF/AFL deaths. This analysis encompassed the period from 1990 to 2021. Globally, in 2021, there were 4.48 million incident cases [95% uncertainty interval (UI): 3.61-5.70], 8.36 million DALYs (95% UI: 6.97-10.13) and 0.34 million deaths (95% UI: 0.29-0.37) attributed to AF/AFL. The AF/AFL burden in 2021, as well as its trends from 1990 to 2021, displayed substantial variations based on gender, SDI quintiles, and geographical regions. High systolic blood pressure emerged as the leading contributor to age-standardized AF/AFL incidence, prevalence, death, and DALY rate globally among all potential risk factors, followed closely by high body mass index. CONCLUSION: Our study underscores the enduring significance of AF/AFL as a prominent public health concern worldwide, marked by profound regional and national variations. Despite the substantial potential for prevention and management of AF/AFL, there is a pressing imperative to adopt more cost-effective strategies and interventions to target modifiable risk factors, particularly in areas where the burden of AF/AFL is high or escalating.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Atrial Flutter , Global Burden of Disease , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Atrial Fibrillation/mortality , Atrial Fibrillation/economics , Atrial Flutter/epidemiology , Male , Female , Global Burden of Disease/trends , Aged , Incidence , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Aged, 80 and over , Adult , Disability-Adjusted Life Years/trends , Risk Assessment , Age Distribution , Global Health , Sex Distribution , Young Adult , Time Factors , AdolescentABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Three randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated that first-line cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation decreases atrial tachycardia in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) compared with antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). The aim of this study was to develop a cost-effectiveness model (CEM) for first-line cryoablation compared with first-line AADs for the treatment of PAF. The model used a Danish healthcare perspective. METHODS: Individual patient-level data from the Cryo-FIRST, STOP AF and EARLY-AF RCTs were used to parameterise the CEM. The model structure consisted of a hybrid decision tree (one-year time horizon) and a Markov model (40-year time horizon, with a three-month cycle length). Health-related quality of life was expressed in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Costs and benefits were discounted at 3% per year. Model outcomes were produced using probabilistic sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: First-line cryoablation is dominant, meaning it results in lower costs (-2,663) and more QALYs (0.18) when compared to first-line AADs. First-line cryoablation also has a 99.96% probability of being cost-effective, at a cost-effectiveness threshold of 23,200 per QALY gained. Regardless of initial treatment, patients were expected to receive â¼ 1.2 ablation procedures over a lifetime horizon. CONCLUSION: First-line cryoablation is both more effective and less costly (i.e. dominant), when compared with AADs for patients with symptomatic PAF in a Danish healthcare system.
Subject(s)
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents , Atrial Fibrillation , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cryosurgery , Drug Costs , Markov Chains , Models, Economic , Quality of Life , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Atrial Fibrillation/economics , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology , Humans , Cryosurgery/economics , Cryosurgery/adverse effects , Denmark , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/economics , Treatment Outcome , Time Factors , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Decision Support Techniques , Aged , Pulmonary Veins/surgery , Pulmonary Veins/physiopathology , Cost Savings , Decision TreesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Same day discharge (SDD) following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedure has emerged as routine practice, and primarily driven by operator discretion. However, the impacts of SDD on clinical outcomes, healthcare system costs, and patient reported outcomes (PROs) have not been systematically studied. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing routine AF ablation procedures with SDD versus overnight observation (NSDD). After propensity adjustment we compared postprocedure adverse events (AEs), healthcare system costs, and changes in PROs. RESULTS: We identified 310 cases, with 159 undergoing SDD and 151 staying at least one midnight in the hospital (NSDD). Compared with NSDD, SDD patients were similar age (mean 64 vs. 66, p = 0.3), sex (26% female vs. 27%, p = 0.8), and with lower mean CHADS2-VA2Sc scores (2.0 vs. 2.7; p < 0.011). The primary outcome of AEs was noninferior in SDD versus NSDD patients (odds ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.21-0.99; noninferiority margin of 10%). There were also no differences in overall cost to the healthcare system between SDD and NSDD (p = 0.11). PROs numerically favored SDD (p = NS for all scores). CONCLUSIONS: Physician selection for SDD appears at least as safe as NSDD with respect to clinical outcomes and SDD is not significantly less costly to the health system. There is a trend towards more favorable, general PROs among SDD patients. Routine SDD should be strongly considered for patients undergoing routine AF ablation procedures.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Catheter Ablation , Patient Discharge , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Atrial Fibrillation/economics , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology , Female , Male , Retrospective Studies , Catheter Ablation/economics , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Time Factors , Patient Discharge/economics , Hospital Costs , Risk Factors , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Length of Stay/economics , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/economics , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Cardiac ablation is a well-established method for treating atrial fibrillation (AF). Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a non-thermal therapeutic alternative to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoballoon ablation (CRYO). PFA uses high-voltage electric pulses to target cells. The present analysis aims to quantify the costs, outcomes, and resources associated with these three ablation strategies for paroxysmal AF. METHODS: Real-world clinical data were prospectively collected during index hospitalization by three European medical centers (Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands) specialized in cardiac ablation. These data included procedure times (pre-procedural, skin-to-skin and post-procedural), resource use, and staff burden. Data regarding complications associated with each of the three treatment options and redo procedures were extracted from the literature. Costs were collected from hospital economic formularies and published cost databases. A cost-consequence model from the hospital perspective was built to estimate the impact of the three treatment options in terms of effectiveness and costs. RESULTS: Across the three centers, N = 91 patients were included over a period of 12 months. A significant difference was seen in pre-procedural time (mean ± SD, PFA: 13.6 ± 3.7 min, CRYO: 18.8 ± 6.6 min, RFA: 20.4 ± 6.4 min; p < .001). Procedural time (skin-to-skin) was also different across alternatives (PFA: 50.9 ± 22.4 min, CRYO: 74.5 ± 24.5 min, RFA: 140.2 ± 82.4 min; p < .0001). The model reported an overall cost of 216,535 per 100 patients treated with PFA, 301,510 per 100 patients treated with CRYO and 346,594 per 100 patients treated with RFA. Overall, the cumulative savings associated with PFA (excluding kit costs) were 850 and 1,301 per patient compared to CRYO and RFA, respectively. CONCLUSION: PFA demonstrated shorter procedure time compared to CRYO and RFA. Model estimates indicate that these time savings result in cost savings for hospitals and reduce outlay on redo procedures. Clinical practice in individual hospitals varies and may impact the ability to transfer the results of this analysis to other settings.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Catheter Ablation , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Atrial Fibrillation/economics , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Catheter Ablation/economics , Catheter Ablation/methods , Aged , Operative Time , Prospective Studies , Europe , Cryosurgery/economics , Cryosurgery/methods , Postoperative Complications/economics , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Health Resources/economicsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of Apixaban and Rivaroxaban, compared to Warfarin, for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Iran. METHOD: A Markov model with a 30-year time horizon was employed to simulate and assess different treatment strategies' cost-effectiveness. The study population comprised Iranian adults with NVAF, identified through specialist consultations, hospital visits, and archival record reviews. Direct medical costs, direct nonmedical, and indirect costs were included. Quality-adjusted life years (QALY) were assessed using an EQ-5D questionnaire. This study utilized a cost-effectiveness threshold of $11 134 per QALY. RESULTS: Apixaban demonstrated superior cost-effectiveness compared to Rivaroxaban and Warfarin. Over 30 years, total costs were lower in the Apixaban and Rivaroxaban groups compared to the Warfarin group ($126.18 and $109.99 vs. $150.49). However, Apixaban showed higher total QALYs gained compared to others (0.134 vs. 0.133 and 0.116). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for comparing Apixaban to Warfarin was calculated at -1332.83 cost per QALY, below the threshold of $11 134, indicating Apixaban's cost-effectiveness. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the findings, with ICER consistently remaining below the threshold. Over 5 years (2024-2028) of Apixaban usage, the incremental cost starts at USD 70 250 296 in the first year and gradually rises to USD 71 770 662 in the fifth year. DSA and PSA were assessed to prove the robustness of the results. CONCLUSION: This study shows that Apixaban is a cost-effective option for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in Iran compared to Warfarin.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Atrial Fibrillation , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Factor Xa Inhibitors , Pyrazoles , Pyridones , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Rivaroxaban , Stroke , Warfarin , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/economics , Pyrazoles/therapeutic use , Pyrazoles/economics , Pyridones/economics , Pyridones/therapeutic use , Warfarin/economics , Warfarin/therapeutic use , Iran/epidemiology , Stroke/prevention & control , Stroke/economics , Stroke/epidemiology , Stroke/etiology , Rivaroxaban/economics , Rivaroxaban/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/economics , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Male , Factor Xa Inhibitors/economics , Factor Xa Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Female , Markov Chains , Aged , Drug Costs , Treatment Outcome , Middle Aged , Budgets , Time FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Left atrial appendage occlusion during cardiac surgery is a therapeutic option for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. The effectiveness and safety of left atrial appendage occlusion have been evaluated in several studies, including the LAAOS-III trial. While these studies have demonstrated efficacy and safety, the long-term economic impact of this surgical technique has not yet been assessed. Here, we aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of left atrial appendage occlusion during cardiac surgery over a long-term time horizon. METHODS: Our study was based on a model representing an hypothetical cohort with the same characteristics as LAAOS-III trial patients. We modelled the incidence of ischemic strokes and systemic embolisms in each intervention arm: "occlusion" and "no-occlusion," using a one-month cycle length with a 20-year time horizon. Regarding occlusion devices, sutures, staples, or an approved surgical occlusion device (AtriClip™-AtriCure, Ohio, USA) could be used. RESULTS: Our model generated an average cost savings of 607 euros per patient and an incremental gain of 0.062 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), resulting an incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of -9,775/QALY. The scenario analysis in which occlusion was systematically performed using the AtriClip™ device generated an ICUR of 3,952/QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: In the base-case analysis, the strategy proved to be more effective and less costly, confirming left atrial appendage occlusion during cardiac surgery as an economically dominant strategy. The scenario analysis also appeared cost-effective, although it did not result in cost savings. This study provides a new perspective on the assessment of the cost-effectiveness of these techniques.
Subject(s)
Atrial Appendage , Atrial Fibrillation , Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Humans , Atrial Appendage/surgery , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/economics , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/methods , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Atrial Fibrillation/economics , France , Male , Female , Stroke/prevention & control , Stroke/economics , Stroke/etiology , AgedABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a promising new ablation modality for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) that has recently become available in the UK National Health Service (NHS). We provide the first known economic evaluation of the technology. METHODS: A cost-comparison model was developed to compare the expected 12-month costs of treating AF using the pentaspline PFA catheter compared with cryoablation for a single hypothetical patient. Model parameters were based on a recent cost-effectiveness analysis by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence where possible or published literature otherwise. Deterministic sensitivity, scenario and threshold analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Costs for a single patient treated with PFA were -3% (-£343) less over 12 months than those who received treatment with cryoablation. PFA was associated with 16% higher catheter costs but repeat ablation costs were over 50% less, driven by a reduction in repeat ablations required. Costs of managing complications were -£211 less in total for PFA compared with cryoablation. CONCLUSIONS: Routine adoption of PFA with the pentaspline PFA catheter looks to be as affordable for the NHS as current treatment alternative cryoablation.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Catheter Ablation , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cryosurgery , State Medicine , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Atrial Fibrillation/economics , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Humans , Cryosurgery/economics , Cryosurgery/methods , United Kingdom , Catheter Ablation/economics , Catheter Ablation/methods , State Medicine/economicsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia. It is also a major risk factor for ischemic stroke. The main objective of our study was to identify direct and indirect costs of AF and AF-related stroke in Slovakia. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective population-based study of AF and stroke related costs both from the third-party healthcare payers and societal perspective. The prevalence and incidence of AF and stroke were determined from central government run healthcare database. Further we estimated both indirect and direct costs of AF and stroke. All costs and healthcare resources were assessed from 2015 through 2019 and were expressed in the respective year. RESULTS: Over the 5-year study period, the prevalence of AF increased by 26% to a total of 149,198 AF cases in 2019, with an estimated total annual economic burden of 66,242,359. Direct medical costs accounted for 94% of the total cost of AF. The total cost of treating patients with stroke in 2019 was estimated at 89,505,669. As a result, the medical costs of stroke that develops as a complication of AF have been estimated to be 25,734,080 in 2019. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows a substantial economic burden of AF and AF-related stroke in Slovakia. In view of the above, both screening for asymptomatic AF in high-risk populations and effective early management of AF with a focused on thromboprophylaxis rhythm control should be implemented.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Stroke , Humans , Slovakia/epidemiology , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Atrial Fibrillation/economics , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Stroke/epidemiology , Stroke/economics , Female , Male , Aged , Middle Aged , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Cost of Illness , Incidence , Prevalence , Aged, 80 and over , AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Implantable loop recorders (ILRs) are increasingly used for long-term rhythm monitoring after ischaemic and cryptogenic stroke, with the goal of detecting atrial fibrillation (AF) and subsequent initiation of oral anticoagulation to reduce risk of adverse clinical outcomes. There is a need to determine the effectiveness of different rhythm monitoring strategies in this context. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of individuals with commercial and Medicare Advantage insurance in Optum Labs Data Warehouse who had incident ischaemic or cryptogenic stroke and no prior cardiovascular implantable electronic device from 1 January 2016 to 30 June 2021. Patients were stratified by rhythm monitoring strategy: ILR, long-term continuous external cardiac monitor (>48 hours to 30 days) or Holter monitor (≤48 hours). The primary outcome was risk-adjusted all-cause mortality at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included new diagnosis of AF and oral anticoagulation, bleeding, and costs. RESULTS: Among 48 901 patients with ischaemic or cryptogenic stroke, 9235 received an ILR, 29 103 long-term continuous external monitor and 10 563 Holter monitor only. Mean age was 69.9 (SD 11.9) years and 53.5% were female. During the 12-month follow-up period, patients who received ILRs compared with those who received long-term continuous external monitors had a higher odds of new diagnosis of AF and oral anticoagulant initiation (adjusted OR 2.27, 95% CI 2.09 to 2.48). Compared with patients who received long-term continuous external monitors, those who received ILRs had similar 12-month mortality (HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.89 to 1.12), with approximately $13 000 higher costs at baseline (including monitor cost) and $2500 higher costs during 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In this large real-world study of patients with ischaemic or cryptogenic stroke, ILR placement resulted in more diagnosis of AF and initiation of oral anticoagulation, but no difference in mortality compared with long-term continuous external monitors.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Electrocardiography, Ambulatory , Ischemic Stroke , Humans , Female , Male , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Electrocardiography, Ambulatory/instrumentation , Electrocardiography, Ambulatory/economics , Electrocardiography, Ambulatory/methods , Ischemic Stroke/economics , Ischemic Stroke/mortality , Ischemic Stroke/diagnosis , Ischemic Stroke/prevention & control , Ischemic Stroke/etiology , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/economics , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/mortality , United States/epidemiology , Anticoagulants/economics , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Time Factors , Middle Aged , Follow-Up Studies , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Aged, 80 and over , Health Care CostsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) contributes to the generation, recurrence, and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation, and it is associated with worse outcomes. Little is known about the economic impact of OSA therapy in atrial fibrillation. This retrospective cohort study assessed the impact of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy adherence on health care resource use and costs in patients with OSA and atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Insurance claims data for ≥1 year before sleep testing and 2 years after device setup were linked with objective PAP therapy use data. PAP adherence was defined from an extension of the US Medicare 90-day definition. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to create covariate-balanced PAP adherence groups to mitigate confounding. Of 5867 patients (32% women; mean age, 62.7 years), 41% were adherent, 38% were intermediate, and 21% were nonadherent. Mean±SD number of all-cause emergency department visits (0.61±1.21 versus 0.77±1.55 [P=0.023] versus 0.95±1.90 [P<0.001]), all-cause hospitalizations (0.19±0.69 versus 0.24±0.72 [P=0.002] versus 0.34±1.16 [P<0.001]), and cardiac-related hospitalizations (0.06±0.26 versus 0.09±0.41 [P=0.023] versus 0.10±0.44 [P=0.004]) were significantly lower in adherent versus intermediate and nonadherent patients, as were all-cause inpatient costs ($2200±$8054 versus $3274±$12 065 [P=0.002] versus $4483±$16 499 [P<0.001]). All-cause emergency department costs were significantly lower in adherent and intermediate versus nonadherent patients ($499±$1229 and $563±$1292 versus $691±$1652 [P<0.001 and P=0.002], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest clinical and economic benefits of PAP therapy in patients with concomitant OSA and atrial fibrillation. This supports the value of diagnosing and managing OSA and highlights the need for strategies to enhance PAP adherence in this population.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Continuous Positive Airway Pressure , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive , Humans , Female , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/economics , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/therapy , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/economics , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/epidemiology , Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/economics , United States/epidemiology , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Health Resources/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
AIMS: We examine the effects of symptoms and cardiovascular disease (CVD) events on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and healthcare costs in a European population with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: In the EURObservational Research Programme on AF long-term general registry, AF patients from 250 centres in 27 European countries were enrolled and followed for 2 years. We used fixed effects models to estimate the association of symptoms and CVD events on HRQOL and annual healthcare costs. We found significant decrements in HRQOL in AF patients in whom ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) [-0.075 (95% confidence interval -0.144, -0.006)], angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) [-0.037 (-0.071, -0.003)], new-onset/worsening heart failure [-0.064 (-0.088, -0.039)], bleeding events [-0.031 (-0.059, -0.003)], thromboembolic events [-0.071 (-0.115, -0.027)], mild symptoms [0.037 (-0.048, -0.026)], or severe/disabling symptoms [-0.090 (-0.108, -0.072)] occurred during the follow-up. During follow-up, annual healthcare costs were associated with an increase of 11 718 (8497, 14 939) in patients with STEMI, 5823 (4757, 6889) in patients with angina/NSTEMI, 3689 (3219, 4158) in patients with new-onset or worsening heart failure, 3792 (3315, 4270) in patients with bleeding events, and 3182 (2483, 3881) in patients with thromboembolic events, compared with AF patients without these events. Healthcare costs were primarily driven by inpatient costs. There were no significant differences in HRQOL or healthcare resource use between EU regions or by sex. CONCLUSION: Symptoms and CVD events are associated with a high burden on AF patients and healthcare systems throughout Europe.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Health Care Costs , Quality of Life , Registries , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/economics , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Male , Female , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Europe , Aged , Longitudinal Studies , Middle Aged , Heart Failure/economics , Heart Failure/therapy , Angina Pectoris/economics , Angina Pectoris/epidemiology , Angina Pectoris/therapy , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/economics , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Time Factors , Hemorrhage/economics , Risk Factors , Hospitalization/economicsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The reimbursement policy for cryptogenic stroke (CS) was expanded in November 2018 from recurrent strokes to the first stroke episode. No reports have demonstrated whether this policy change has affected trends in implantable loop recorder (ILR) utilization. METHODS: We identified patients who received an ILR implant using the Korea Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database between July 2016 and October 2021. Patients meeting all the following criteria were considered to have CS indication: 1) prior stroke history, 2) no previous history of atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF/AFL), and 3) no maintenance of oral anticoagulant for ≥4 weeks within a year before ILR implant. AF/AFL diagnosed within 3 years after ILR implant or before ILR removal was considered ILR-driven. RESULTS: Among 3,056 patients, 1,001 (32.8%) had CS indications. The total ILR implant number gradually increased for both CS and non-CS indications and the number of CS indication significantly increased after implementing the expanded reimbursement policy. The detection rate for AF/AFL was 26.3% in CS patients over 3 years, which was significantly higher in patients implanted with an ILR within 2 months after stroke than those implanted later. CONCLUSION: The expanded coverage policy for CS had a significant impact on the number of ILR implantation for CS indication. The diagnostic yield of ILR for AF/AFL detection seems better when ILR is implanted within 2 months than later. Further investigation is needed to demonstrate other clinical benefits and the optimal ILR implantation timing.
Subject(s)
Ischemic Stroke , Humans , Republic of Korea , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Ischemic Stroke/diagnosis , Databases, Factual , Time Factors , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement , Retrospective Studies , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/economics , Electrocardiography, Ambulatory/instrumentation , Electrocardiography, Ambulatory/economics , AdultABSTRACT
Aim: Patients with ischemic stroke (IS) commonly undergo monitoring to identify atrial fibrillation with mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry (MCOT) or implantable loop recorders (ILRs). The authors compared readmission, healthcare cost and survival in patients monitored post-stroke with either MCOT or ILR. Materials & methods: The authors used claims data from Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database to identify patients with IS hospitalized from January 2017 to December 2020 who were prescribed ambulatory cardiac monitoring via MCOT or ILR. They compared the costs associated with the initial inpatient visit as well as the rate and causes of readmission, survival and healthcare costs over the following 18 months. Datasets were balanced using patient baseline and hospitalization characteristics. Multivariable generalized linear gamma regression was used for cost comparisons. Cox proportional hazard regression was used for survival and readmission analysis. Sub-cohorts were analyzed based on the severity of the index IS. Results: In 2244 patients, readmissions were significantly lower in the MCOT monitored group (30.2%) compared with the ILR group (35.4%) (hazard ratio [HR] 1.23; 95% CI: 1.04-1.46). Average cost over 18 months starting with the index IS was $27,429 (USD) lower in the MCOT group (95% CI: $22,353-$32,633). Survival difference bordered on statistical significance and trended to lower mortality in MCOT (8.9%) versus ILR (11.3%) (HR 1.30; 95% CI: 1:00-1.69), led by significance in patients with complications or comorbidities with the index event (MCOT 7.5%, ILR 11.5%; HR 1.62; 95% CI: 1.11-2.36). Conclusion: The use of MCOT versus ILR as the primary monitor following IS was associated with significant decreases in readmission, lower costs for the initial IS and total care over the next 18 months, significantly lower mortality for patients with complications and comorbidities at the index stroke, and a trend toward improved survival across all patients.
Subject(s)
Patient Readmission , Telemetry , Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Telemetry/economics , Telemetry/methods , Telemetry/instrumentation , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Patient Readmission/economics , Middle Aged , Atrial Fibrillation/economics , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/mortality , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Stroke/economics , Stroke/mortality , Stroke/diagnosis , Ischemic Stroke/economics , Ischemic Stroke/diagnosis , Ischemic Stroke/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Aged, 80 and overABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Integrating patient-specific cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED)-detected atrial fibrillation (AF) burden with measures of health care cost and utilization allows for an accurate assessment of the AF-related impact on health care use. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to assess the incremental cost of device-recognized AF vs no AF; compare relative costs of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (pAF), persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF), and permanent atrial fibrillation (PermAF) AF; and evaluate rates and sources of health care utilization between cohorts. METHODS: Using the de-identified Optum Clinformatics U.S. claims database (2015-2020) linked with the Medtronic CareLink database, CIED patients were identified who transmitted data ≥6 months postimplantation. Annualized per-patient costs in follow-up were analyzed from insurance claims and adjusted to 2020 U.S. dollars. Costs and rates of health care utilization were compared between patients with no AF and those with device-recognized pAF, PeAF, and PermAF. Analyses were adjusted for geographical region, insurance type, CHA2DS2-VASc score, and implantation year. RESULTS: Of 21,391 patients (mean age 72.9 ± 10.9 years; 56.3% male) analyzed, 7,798 (36.5%) had device-recognized AF. The incremental annualized increased cost in those with AF was $12,789 ± $161,749 per patient, driven by increased rates of health care encounters, adverse clinical events associated with AF, and AF-specific interventions. Among those with AF, PeAF was associated with the highest cost, driven by increased rates of inpatient and outpatient hospitalization encounters, heart failure hospitalizations, and AF-specific interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Presence of device-recognized AF was associated with increased health care cost. Among those with AF, patients with PeAF had the highest health care costs. Mechanisms for cost differentials include both disease-specific consequences and physician-directed interventions.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Health Care Costs , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/economics , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Male , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Female , Aged , Middle Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , United States , Defibrillators, Implantable/economics , Defibrillators, Implantable/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Cost of Illness , Aged, 80 and overABSTRACT
Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia, poses a significant public health and economic burden. Although socioeconomic factors such as income and education have been implicated in AF incidence and outcomes, the potential sex-specific associations remained underexplored. This narrative review aimed to fill this gap by synthesizing existing literature on the sex-specific impact of socioeconomic factors on AF incidence, treatment, and outcome. Among these socioeconomic factors, we identified income and education as the most frequently cited determinants. Nevertheless, the magnitude and direction of these sex differences remained inconsistent across studies. The review uncovered that many studies did not include sex in the analysis when assessing the impact of socioeconomic factors on AF. We highlighted that there is a paucity of studies employing sex-stratified reporting and sex interaction analyses, thereby hindering a deeper understanding of these relationships.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Socioeconomic Factors , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/economics , Sex Factors , Incidence , Female , Risk Factors , Male , Global HealthSubject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Hospitalization , Ischemic Stroke , Registries , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/economics , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Greece/epidemiology , Male , Female , Ischemic Stroke/economics , Ischemic Stroke/therapy , Ischemic Stroke/epidemiology , Aged , Middle Aged , Stroke/economics , Stroke/epidemiology , Stroke/therapy , Aged, 80 and overABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The impact of socioeconomic status on the clinical outcomes of patients admitted to the hospital for atrial fibrillation (AF) is not well described. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the association between median neighborhood household income (mNHI) and clinical outcomes among patients admitted to the hospital for AF. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed primary AF hospitalizations from the United States National Inpatient Sample between 2016 and 2020. The analyzed sample was divided into quartiles based on the mNHI in the zip code of the patient's residence. The lowest quartile was used as the reference category. Study outcomes included inpatient procedure utilization (ablation, cardioversion, percutaneous left atrial appendage closure), length of stay, cost, mortality, and disposition. Weighted multivariable logistic and linear regression, adjusting for multiple patient and hospital-level characteristics, was performed. RESULTS: Patients in the highest mNHI quartile had lower comorbidity burden, lower in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7-0.87; P <.001), lower discharges to care facility (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.83-0.9; P <.001), shorter length of stay (adjusted mean difference -0.26; 95% CI -0.30 to -0.22; P <.001), higher procedure utilization, and higher health care costs ($12,124 vs $10,018) compared to the lowest mNHI quartile patients. CONCLUSION: We identified significantly higher in-hospital mortality and lower procedural/resource utilization in patients living in lower-income neighborhoods compared to higher-income neighborhoods. Further research is needed to better understand the drivers of these disparities and the strategies to improve health care disparities between socioeconomic groups.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Income , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/economics , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Female , Male , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology , Aged , Income/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Mortality/trends , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Neighborhood Characteristics , Residence CharacteristicsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, with an increasing incidence and prevalence because of progressively aging populations. Costs related to AF are both direct and indirect. This systematic review aims to identify the main cost drivers of the illness, assess the potential economic impact resulting from changes in care strategies, and propose interventions where they are most needed. METHODS: A systematic literature search of the PubMed and Scopus databases was performed to identify analytical observational studies defining the cost of illness in cases of AF. The search strategy was based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 recommendations. RESULTS: Of the 944 articles retrieved, 24 met the inclusion criteria. These studies were conducted in several countries. All studies calculated the direct medical costs, whereas 8 of 24 studies assessed indirect costs. The median annual direct medical cost per patient, considering all studies, was 9409 (13 333 US dollars in purchasing power parities), with a very large variability due to the heterogeneity of different analyses. Hospitalization costs are generally the main cost drivers. Comorbidities and complications, such as stroke, considerably increase the average annual direct medical cost of AF. CONCLUSIONS: In most of the analyzed studies, inpatient care cost represents the main component of the mean direct medical cost per patient. Stroke and heart failure are responsible for a large share of the total costs; therefore, implementing guidelines to manage comorbidities in AF is a necessary step to improve health and mitigate healthcare costs.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Health Care Costs , Atrial Fibrillation/economics , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Humans , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Cost of Illness , Hospitalization/economics , ComorbidityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulants (OACs) mitigate the risk of stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. OBJECTIVE: Elderly AF patients who were treated with OACs (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, or warfarin) were compared against AF patients who were not treated with OACs with respect to their clinical and economic outcomes. METHODS: Newly diagnosed AF patients were identified between January 2013 and December 2017 in the Medicare database. Evidence of an OAC treatment claim on or after the first AF diagnosis was used to classify patients into treatment-defined cohorts, and these cohorts were further stratified based on the initial OAC prescribed. The risks of stroke/systemic embolism (SE), major bleeding (MB), and death were analyzed using inverse probability treatment weighted time-dependent Cox regression models, and costs were compared with marginal structural models. RESULTS: The two treatment groups were composed of 1,421,187 AF patients: OAC treated (N = 583,350, 41.0% [36.4% apixaban, 4.9% dabigatran, 0.1% edoxaban, 26.7% rivaroxaban, and 31.9% warfarin patients]) and untreated (N = 837,837, 59.0%). OAC-treated patients had a lower adjusted risk of stroke/SE compared to untreated patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68-0.72). Additionally patients receiving OACs had a lower adjusted risk of death (HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.55-0.56) and a higher risk of MB (HR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.54-1.59) and this trend was consistent across each OAC sub-group. The OAC-treated cohort had lower adjusted total healthcare costs per patient per month ($4,381 vs $7,172; p < .0001). CONCLUSION: For the OAC-treated cohort in this elderly US population, stroke/SE and all-cause death were lower, while risk of MB was higher. Among OAC treated patients, total healthcare costs were lower than those of the untreated cohort.