Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 44.061
1.
Ren Fail ; 46(1): 2338484, 2024 Dec.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38832469

Critically ill COVID-19 patients may exhibit various clinical symptoms of renal dysfunction including severe Acute Kidney Injury (AKI). Currently, there is a lack of bibliometric analyses on COVID-19-related AKI. The aim of this study is to provide an overview of the current research status and hot topics regarding COVID-19 AKI. The literature was retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database. Subsequently, we utilized Microsoft Excel, VOSviewer, Citespace, and Pajek software to revealed the current research status, emerging topics, and developmental trends pertaining to COVID-19 AKI. This study encompassed a total of 1507 studies on COVID-19 AKI. The United States, China, and Italy emerged as the leading three countries in terms of publication numbers, contributing 498 (33.05%), 229 (15.20%), and 140 (9.29%) studies, respectively. The three most active and influential institutions include Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan University and Harvard Medical School. Ronco C from Italy, holds the record for the highest number of publications, with a total of 15 papers authored. Cheng YC's work from China has garnered the highest number of citations, totaling 470 citations. The co-occurrence analysis of author keywords reveals that 'mortality', 'intensive care units', 'chronic kidney disease', 'nephrology', 'renal transplantation', 'acute respiratory distress syndrome', and 'risk factors' emerge as the primary areas of focus within the realm of COVID-19 AKI. In summary, this study analyzes the research trends in the field of COVID-19 AKI, providing a reference for further exploration and research on COVID-19 AKI mechanisms and treatment.


Acute Kidney Injury , Bibliometrics , COVID-19 , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Italy/epidemiology , Betacoronavirus , China/epidemiology , Global Health
2.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 11639, 2024 05 21.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773161

COVID-19 is a kind of coronavirus that appeared in China in the Province of Wuhan in December 2019. The most significant influence of this virus is its very highly contagious characteristic which may lead to death. The standard diagnosis of COVID-19 is based on swabs from the throat and nose, their sensitivity is not high enough and so they are prone to errors. Early diagnosis of COVID-19 disease is important to provide the chance of quick isolation of the suspected cases and to decrease the opportunity of infection in healthy people. In this research, a framework for chest X-ray image classification tasks based on deep learning is proposed to help in early diagnosis of COVID-19. The proposed framework contains two phases which are the pre-processing phase and classification phase which uses pre-trained convolution neural network models based on transfer learning. In the pre-processing phase, different image enhancements have been applied to full and segmented X-ray images to improve the classification performance of the CNN models. Two CNN pre-trained models have been used for classification which are VGG19 and EfficientNetB0. From experimental results, the best model achieved a sensitivity of 0.96, specificity of 0.94, precision of 0.9412, F1 score of 0.9505 and accuracy of 0.95 using enhanced full X-ray images for binary classification of chest X-ray images into COVID-19 or normal with VGG19. The proposed framework is promising and achieved a classification accuracy of 0.935 for 4-class classification.


COVID-19 , Deep Learning , Neural Networks, Computer , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19/diagnosis , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Radiography, Thoracic/methods , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnostic imaging , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/diagnostic imaging , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
3.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1382655, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38803494

Introduction: Global microplastic (MP) pollution is now well recognized, with humans and animals consuming and inhaling MPs on a daily basis, with a growing body of concern surrounding the potential impacts on human health. Methods: Using a mouse model of mild COVID-19, we describe herein the effects of azide-free 1 µm polystyrene MP beads, co-delivered into lungs with a SARS-CoV-2 omicron BA.5 inoculum. The effect of MPs on the host response to SARS-CoV-2 infection was analysed using histopathology and RNA-Seq at 2 and 6 days post-infection (dpi). Results: Although infection reduced clearance of MPs from the lung, virus titres and viral RNA levels were not significantly affected by MPs, and overt MP-associated clinical or histopathological changes were not observed. However, RNA-Seq of infected lungs revealed that MP exposure suppressed innate immune responses at 2 dpi and increased pro-inflammatory signatures at 6 dpi. The cytokine profile at 6 dpi showed a significant correlation with the 'cytokine release syndrome' signature observed in some COVID-19 patients. Discussion: The findings are consistent with the recent finding that MPs can inhibit phagocytosis of apoptotic cells via binding of Tim4. They also add to a growing body of literature suggesting that MPs can dysregulate inflammatory processes in specific disease settings.


COVID-19 , Disease Models, Animal , Immunity, Innate , Lung , Microplastics , SARS-CoV-2 , Animals , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/virology , Immunity, Innate/drug effects , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Mice , Lung/immunology , Lung/virology , Lung/pathology , Cytokines/metabolism , Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Female , Cytokine Release Syndrome/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Betacoronavirus/immunology , Pandemics
4.
Biol Pharm Bull ; 47(5): 930-940, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38692871

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by the etiological agent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). COVID-19, with the recurrent epidemics of new variants of SARS-CoV-2, remains a global public health problem, and new antivirals are still required. Some cholesterol derivatives, such as 25-hydroxycholesterol, are known to have antiviral activity against a wide range of enveloped and non-enveloped viruses, including SARS-CoV-2. At the entry step of SARS-CoV-2 infection, the viral envelope fuses with the host membrane dependent of viral spike (S) glycoproteins. From the screening of cholesterol derivatives, we found a new compound 26,27-dinorcholest-5-en-24-yne-3ß,20-diol (Nat-20(S)-yne) that inhibited the SARS-CoV-2 S protein-dependent membrane fusion in a syncytium formation assay. Nat-20(S)-yne exhibited the inhibitory activities of SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus entry and intact SARS-CoV-2 infection in a dose-dependent manner. Among the variants of SARS-CoV-2, inhibition of infection by Nat-20(S)-yne was stronger in delta and Wuhan strains, which predominantly invade into cells via fusion at the plasma membrane, than in omicron strains. The interaction between receptor-binding domain of S proteins and host receptor ACE2 was not affected by Nat-20(S)-yne. Unlike 25-hydroxycholesterol, which regulates various steps of cholesterol metabolism, Nat-20(S)-yne inhibited only de novo cholesterol biosynthesis. As a result, plasma membrane cholesterol content was substantially decreased in Nat-20(S)-yne-treated cells, leading to inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat-20(S)-yne having a new mechanism of action may be a potential therapeutic candidate for COVID-19.


Antiviral Agents , COVID-19 , Cholesterol , SARS-CoV-2 , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus , SARS-CoV-2/drug effects , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Humans , COVID-19/virology , Cholesterol/metabolism , Vero Cells , Chlorocebus aethiops , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/metabolism , Animals , Virus Internalization/drug effects , Betacoronavirus/drug effects , Pandemics , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2/metabolism , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/virology
5.
Neurosciences (Riyadh) ; 29(2): 133-138, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38740405

Bilateral femoral neuropathy is rare, especially that caused by bilateral compressive iliopsoas, psoas, or iliacus muscle hematomas. We present a case of bilateral femoral neuropathy due to spontaneous psoas hematomas developed during COVID-19 critical illness. A 41-year-old patient developed COVID-19 pneumonia, and his condition deteriorated rapidly. A decrease in the hemoglobin level prompted imaging studies during his intensive care unit (ICU) stay. Bilateral psoas hematomas were identified as the source of bleeding. Thereafter, the patient complained of weakness in both upper and lower limbs and numbness in the lower limb. He was considered to have critical illness neuropathy and was referred to rehabilitation. Electrodiagnostic testing suggested bilateral femoral neuropathy because of compression due to hematomas developed during the course of his ICU stay. The consequences of iliopsoas hematomas occurring in the critically ill can be catastrophic, ranging from hemorrhagic shock to severe weakness, highlighting the importance of recognizing this entity.


COVID-19 , Femoral Neuropathy , Hematoma , Psoas Muscles , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/complications , Hematoma/diagnostic imaging , Hematoma/etiology , Hematoma/complications , Male , Adult , Femoral Neuropathy/etiology , Psoas Muscles/diagnostic imaging , Critical Illness , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnostic imaging , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/diagnostic imaging , Pandemics , Betacoronavirus
6.
Med Sci (Basel) ; 12(2)2024 May 22.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38804384

mRNA vaccines have emerged as an optimistic technological platform for vaccine innovation in this new scientific era. mRNA vaccines have dramatically altered the domain of vaccinology by offering a versatile and rapid approach to combating infectious diseases and virus-induced cancers. Clinical trials have demonstrated efficacy rates of 94-95% in preventing COVID-19, and mRNA vaccines have been increasingly recognized as a powerful vaccine platform. Although mRNA vaccines have played an essential role in the COVID-19 pandemic, they still have several limitations; their instability and degradation affect their storage, delivery, and over-all efficiency. mRNA is typically enclosed in a transport mechanism to facilitate its entry into the target cell because it is an unstable and negatively charged molecule. For instance, mRNA that is given using lipid-nanoparticle-based vaccine delivery systems (LNPs) solely enters cells through endocytosis, establishing an endosome without damaging the cell membrane. The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the development of mRNA vaccine platforms used to treat and prevent several infectious diseases. This technology has the potential to change the future course of the disease by providing a safe and effective way to combat infectious diseases and cancer. A single-stranded genetic sequence found in mRNA vaccines instructs host cells to produce proteins inside ribosomes to elicit immunological responses and prepare the immune system to fight infections or cancer cells. The potential applications of mRNA vaccine technology are vast and can lead to the development of a preferred vaccine pattern. As a result, a new generation of vaccinations has gradually gained popularity and access to the general population. To adapt the design of an antigen, and even combine sequences from different variations in response to new changes in the viral genome, mRNA vaccines may be used. Current mRNA vaccines provide adequate safety and protection, but the duration of that protection can only be determined if further clinical research is conducted.


COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , mRNA Vaccines , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Pandemics/prevention & control , Oncogenic Viruses , Vaccines, Synthetic , Vaccine Development , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Betacoronavirus , Viral Vaccines/immunology , RNA, Messenger , Neoplasms
7.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 18(4): 520-531, 2024 Apr 30.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728643

INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused global health, economic, and population loss. Variants of the coronavirus contributed to the severity of the disease and persistent rise in infections. This study aimed to identify potential drug candidates from fifteen approved antiviral drugs against SARS-CoV-2 (6LU7), SARS-CoV (5B6O), and SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (6M0J) using virtual screening and pharmacokinetics to gain insights into COVID-19 therapeutics. METHODOLOGY: We employed drug repurposing approach to analyze binding performance of fifteen clinically approved antiviral drugs against the main protease of SARS-CoV-2 (6LU7), SARS-CoV (5B6O), and SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins bound to ACE-2 receptor (6M0J), to provide an insight into the therapeutics of COVID-19. AutoDock Vina was used for docking studies. The binding affinities were calculated, and 2-3D structures of protein-ligand interactions were drawn. RESULTS: Rutin, hesperidin, and nelfinavir are clinically approved antiviral drugs with high binding affinity to proteins 6LU7, 5B6O, and 6M0J. These ligands have excellent pharmacokinetics, ensuring efficient absorption, metabolism, excretion, and digestibility. Hesperidin showed the most potent interaction with spike protein 6M0J, forming four H-bonds. Nelfinavir had a high human intestinal absorption (HIA) score of 0.93, indicating maximum absorption in the body and promising interactions with 6LU7. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that rutin, hesperidin, and nelfinavir had the highest binding results against the proposed drug targets. The computational approach effectively identified SARS-CoV-2 inhibitors. COVID-19 is still a recurrent threat globally and predictive analysis using natural compounds might serve as a starting point for new drug development against SARS-CoV-2 and related viruses.


Antiviral Agents , COVID-19 , Drug Repositioning , Molecular Docking Simulation , SARS-CoV-2 , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus , SARS-CoV-2/drug effects , Humans , Antiviral Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Antiviral Agents/chemistry , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/metabolism , COVID-19/virology , Pandemics , Betacoronavirus/drug effects , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Coronavirus 3C Proteases/antagonists & inhibitors , Coronavirus 3C Proteases/metabolism , Coronavirus 3C Proteases/chemistry
8.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 104(20): 1812-1824, 2024 May 28.
Article Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38782749

Although COVID-19 no longer constitutes a "public health emergency of international concern", which still has being spreading around the world at a low level. Small molecule drugs are the main antiviral treatment for novel coronavirus recommended in China. Although a variety of small-molecule antiviral drugs against COVID-19 have been listed in China, there is no specific drug recommendation for special populations. Society of Bacterial Infection and Resistance of Chinese Medical Association, together with the National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, and the National Center for Respiratory Medicine, organized domestic experts in various fields such as respiratory, virology, infection, critical care, emergency medicine and pharmacy to release Expert Consensus on the Clinical Application of Oral Small-Molecule Antiviral Drugs against COVID-19. The main content of this consensus includes the introduction of seven small-molecule antiviral drugs against COVID-19, focusing on the drug recommendations for 14 special groups such as the elderly, patients with complicated chronic diseases, tumor patients, pregnant women, and children, and providing suggestions for clinicians to standardize drug use.


Antiviral Agents , COVID-19 , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Consensus , Betacoronavirus , Administration, Oral , China , Pregnancy
9.
BMC Med Ethics ; 25(1): 63, 2024 May 22.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38778293

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic forced governments, multilateral public health organisations and research institutions to undertake research quickly to inform their responses to the pandemic. Most COVID-19-related studies required swift approval, creating ethical and practical challenges for regulatory authorities and researchers. In this paper, we examine the landscape of ethics review processes in Africa during public health emergencies (PHEs). METHODS: We searched four electronic databases (Web of Science, PUBMED, MEDLINE Complete, and CINAHL) to identify articles describing ethics review processes during public health emergencies and/or pandemics. We selected and reviewed those articles that were focused on Africa. We charted the data from the retrieved articles including the authors and year of publication, title, country and disease(s) reference, broad areas of (ethical) consideration, paper type, and approach. RESULTS: Of an initial 4536 records retrieved, we screened the titles and abstracts of 1491 articles, and identified 72 articles for full review. Nine articles were selected for inclusion. Of these nine articles, five referenced West African countries including Liberia, Guinea and Sierra Leone, and experiences linked to the Ebola virus disease. Two articles focused on South Africa and Kenya, while the other two articles discussed more general experiences and pitfalls of ethics review during PHEs in Africa more broadly. We found no articles published on ethics review processes in Africa before the 2014 Ebola outbreak, and only a few before the COVID-19 outbreak. Although guidelines on protocol review and approval processes for PHEs were more frequently discussed after the 2014 Ebola outbreak, these did not focus on Africa specifically. CONCLUSIONS: There is a gap in the literature about ethics review processes and preparedness within Africa during PHEs. This paper underscores the importance of these processes to inform practices that facilitate timely, context-relevant research that adequately recognises and reinforces human dignity within the quest to advance scientific knowledge about diseases. This is important to improve fast responses to PHEs, reduce mortality and morbidity, and enhance the quality of care before, during, and after pandemics.


COVID-19 , Emergencies , Pandemics , Public Health , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Public Health/ethics , Africa/epidemiology , Ethical Review , Betacoronavirus , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Ethics, Research
10.
Sao Paulo Med J ; 142(6): e2022608, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38808794

BACKGROUND: The cause of oropharyngeal dysphagia in patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) can be multifactorial and may underly limitations in swallowing rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: Analyze the factors related to dysphagia in patients with COVID-19 immediately after orotracheal extubation and the factors that influence swallowing rehabilitation. DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective study. METHODS: The presence of dysphagia was evaluated using the American Speech-Language Hearing Association National Outcome Measurement System (ASHA NOMS) scale and variables that influenced swallowing rehabilitation in 140 adult patients who required invasive mechanical ventilation for >48 h. RESULTS: In total, 46.43% of the patients scored 1 or 2 on the ASHA NOMS (severe dysphagia) and 39.29% scored 4 (single consistency delivered orally) or 5 (exclusive oral diet with adaptations). Both the length of mechanical ventilation and the presence of neurological disorders were associated with lower ASHA NOMS scores (odds ratio [OR]: 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74-0.87 P < 0.05; and OR: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.61-0.29; P < 0.05, respectively). Age and the presence of tracheostomy were negatively associated with speech rehabilitation (OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.87--0.96; OR: 0.24; 95% CI: 0.80--0.75), and acute post-COVID-19 kidney injury requiring dialysis and lower scores on the ASHA NOMS were associated with longer time for speech therapy outcomes (ß: 1.62, 95% CI, 0.70-3.17, P < 0.001; ß: -1.24, 95% CI: -1.55--0.92; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Prolonged orotracheal intubation and post-COVID-19 neurological alterations increase the probability of dysphagia immediately after extubation. Increased age and tracheostomy limited rehabilitation.


COVID-19 , Deglutition Disorders , Intubation, Intratracheal , Respiration, Artificial , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/complications , Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Deglutition Disorders/rehabilitation , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Airway Extubation/adverse effects , Adult , Pandemics , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/rehabilitation , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/rehabilitation , Betacoronavirus , Risk Factors , Aged, 80 and over
11.
An Acad Bras Cienc ; 96(2): e20231160, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38808879

This study investigated the association between the IFITM3 rs12252 polymorphism and the severity and mortality of COVID-19 in hospitalized Brazilian patients. A total of 102 COVID-19 patients were included, and the outcomes of interest were defined as death and the need for mechanical ventilation. Genotypes were assessed using Taqman probes. No significant associations were found between the rs12252 polymorphism and COVID-19 outcomes in the original sample, both for death and the need for mechanical ventilation. A meta-analysis, incorporating previous studies that used death as a severity indicator, revealed no association in the allelic and C-recessive models. However, due to the rarity of the T allele and its absence in the sample, further replication studies in larger and more diverse populations are needed to clarify the role of rs12252 in COVID-19 prognosis.


COVID-19 , Membrane Proteins , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , RNA-Binding Proteins , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , Humans , COVID-19/genetics , COVID-19/mortality , Brazil/epidemiology , Membrane Proteins/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Male , Female , RNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide/genetics , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Betacoronavirus/genetics , Pneumonia, Viral/genetics , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Genotype , Aged , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , Respiration, Artificial , Adult
12.
RMD Open ; 10(2)2024 May 24.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38796180

OBJECTIVE: Obesity and age are strongly linked to severe COVID-19 pneumonia where immunomodulatory agents including Janus kinase inhibitors have shown benefits but the efficacy of such therapy in viral pneumonia is not well understood. We evaluated the impact of obesity and age on survival following baricitinib therapy for severe COVID-19. METHODS: A post hoc analysis of the COV-BARRIER multicentre double-blind randomised study of baricitinib versus placebo (PBO) with an assessment of 28-day mortality was performed. All-cause mortality by day 28 was evaluated in a Cox regression analysis (adjusted to age) in three different groups according to body mass index (BMI) (<25 kg/m2, 25-30 kg/m2 and >30 kg/m2) and age <65 years and ≥65 years. RESULTS: In the high BMI group (>25 kg/m2), baricitinib therapy showed a significant survival advantage compared with PBO (incidence rate ratio (IRR) for mortality by day 28 0.53 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.87)) and 0.66 (95% CI 0.46 to 0.94) for the respective <65 years and ≥65 years, respectively. The 28-day all-cause-mortality rates for BMI over 30 were 5.62% for baricitinib and 9.22% for PBO (HR=0.6, p<0.05). For BMI under 25 kg/m2, irrespective of age, baricitinib therapy conferred no survival advantage (IRR of 1.89 (95% CI 0.49 to 7.28) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.46 to 1.99) for <65 years and ≥65 years, respectively) ((mortality 6.6% baricitinib vs 8.1 in PBO), p>0.05). CONCLUSION: The efficacy of baricitinib in COVID-19 pneumonia is linked to obesity suggesting that immunomodulatory therapy benefit is associated with obesity-associated inflammation.


Azetidines , Body Mass Index , COVID-19 , Obesity , Purines , Pyrazoles , SARS-CoV-2 , Sulfonamides , Humans , Purines/therapeutic use , Purines/administration & dosage , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Azetidines/therapeutic use , Azetidines/administration & dosage , Obesity/complications , Male , Middle Aged , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pyrazoles/therapeutic use , Female , Aged , Double-Blind Method , Janus Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Treatment Outcome , Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Pandemics
13.
Sci Total Environ ; 931: 172945, 2024 Jun 25.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38703849

The coagulation process has a high potential as a treatment method that can handle pathogenic viruses including emerging enveloped viruses in drinking water treatment process which can lower infection risk through drinking water consumption. In this study, a surrogate enveloped virus, bacteriophage Փ6, and surrogate non-enveloped viruses, including bacteriophage MS-2, T4, ՓX174, were used to evaluate removal efficiencies and mechanisms by the conventional coagulation process with alum, poly­aluminum chloride, and ferric chloride at pH 5, 7, and 9 in turbid water. Also, treatability of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a recent virus of global concern by coagulation was evaluated as SARS-CoV-2 can presence in drinking water sources. It was observed that an increase in the coagulant dose enhanced the removal efficiency of turbidity and viruses, and the condition that provided the highest removal efficiency of enveloped and non-enveloped viruses was 50 mg/L of coagulants at pH 5. In addition, the coagulation process was more effective for enveloped virus removal than for the non-enveloped viruses, and it demonstrated reduction of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 over 0.83-log with alum. According to culture- and molecular-based assays (qPCR and CDDP-qPCR), the virus removal mechanisms were floc adsorption and coagulant inactivation. Through inactivation with coagulants, coagulants caused capsid destruction, followed by genome damage in non-enveloped viruses; however, damage to a lipid envelope is suggested to contribute to a great extend for enveloped virus inactivation. We demonstrated that conventional coagulation is a promising method for controlling emerging and re-emerging viruses in drinking water.


SARS-CoV-2 , Water Purification , Water Purification/methods , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , COVID-19 , Drinking Water/virology , Drinking Water/chemistry , Alum Compounds , Water Microbiology , Betacoronavirus/physiology , Flocculation , Aluminum Compounds , Ferric Compounds/chemistry
14.
Trials ; 25(1): 328, 2024 May 18.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38760804

BACKGROUND: The SARS CoV-2 pandemic has resulted in more than 1.1 million deaths in the USA alone. Therapeutic options for critically ill patients with COVID-19 are limited. Prior studies showed that post-infection treatment of influenza A virus-infected mice with the liponucleotide CDP-choline, which is an essential precursor for de novo phosphatidylcholine synthesis, improved gas exchange and reduced pulmonary inflammation without altering viral replication. In unpublished studies, we found that treatment of SARS CoV-2-infected K18-hACE2-transgenic mice with CDP-choline prevented development of hypoxemia. We hypothesize that administration of citicoline (the pharmaceutical form of CDP-choline) will be safe in hospitalized SARS CoV-2-infected patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (HARF) and that we will obtain preliminary evidence of clinical benefit to support a larger Phase 3 trial using one or more citicoline doses. METHODS: We will conduct a single-site, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, and randomized Phase 1/2 dose-ranging and safety study of Somazina® citicoline solution for injection in consented adults of any sex, gender, age, or ethnicity hospitalized for SARS CoV-2-associated HARF. The trial is named "SCARLET" (Supplemental Citicoline Administration to Reduce Lung injury Efficacy Trial). We hypothesize that SCARLET will show that i.v. citicoline is safe at one or more of three doses (0.5, 2.5, or 5 mg/kg, every 12 h for 5 days) in hospitalized SARS CoV-2-infected patients with HARF (20 per dose) and provide preliminary evidence that i.v. citicoline improves pulmonary outcomes in this population. The primary efficacy outcome will be the SpO2:FiO2 ratio on study day 3. Exploratory outcomes include Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, dead space ventilation index, and lung compliance. Citicoline effects on a panel of COVID-relevant lung and blood biomarkers will also be determined. DISCUSSION: Citicoline has many characteristics that would be advantageous to any candidate COVID-19 therapeutic, including safety, low-cost, favorable chemical characteristics, and potentially pathogen-agnostic efficacy. Successful demonstration that citicoline is beneficial in severely ill patients with SARS CoV-2-induced HARF could transform management of severely ill COVID patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov on 5/31/2023 (NCT05881135). TRIAL STATUS: Currently enrolling.


COVID-19 , Cytidine Diphosphate Choline , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Cytidine Diphosphate Choline/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , SARS-CoV-2/drug effects , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Treatment Outcome , Hypoxia/drug therapy , Male , Pandemics , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Hospitalization , Female , Betacoronavirus , Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic , Respiratory Insufficiency/drug therapy , Respiratory Insufficiency/virology , Administration, Intravenous , Adult
15.
Can J Rural Med ; 29(2): 71-79, 2024 Apr 01.
Article En, Fr | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38709017

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic presented an unprecedented challenge for rural family physicians. The lessons learned over the course of 2 years have potential to help guide responses to future ecosystem disruption. This qualitative study aims to explore the leadership experiences of rural Canadian family physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic as both local care providers and community health leaders and to identify potential supports and barriers to physician leadership. METHODS: Semi-structured, virtual, qualitative interviews were completed with participants from rural communities in Canada from December 2021 to February 2022 inclusive. Participant recruitment involved identifying seed contacts and conducting snowball sampling. Participants were asked about their experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic, including the role of physician leadership in building community resilience. Data collection was completed on theoretical saturation. Data were thematically analysed using NVivo 12. RESULTS: Sixty-four participants took part from 22 rural communities in 4 provinces. Four key factors were identified that supported physician leadership towards rural resilience during ecosystem disruption: (1) continuity of care, (2) team-based care models, (3) physician well-being and (4) openness to innovative care models. CONCLUSION: Healthcare policy and practice transformation should prioritise developing opportunities to strengthen physician leadership, particularly in rural areas that will be adversely affected by ecosystem disruption. INTRODUCTION: La pandémie de COVID-19 a représenté un défi sans précédent pour les médecins de famille en milieu rural. Les leçons tirées au cours des deux années écoulées peuvent aider à orienter les réponses aux futures perturbations de l'écosystème. Cette étude qualitative vise à explorer les expériences de leadership des médecins de famille ruraux canadiens pendant la pandémie de COVID-19, en tant que prestataires de soins locaux et chefs de file de la santé communautaire, et à identifier les soutiens et les obstacles potentiels au leadership des médecins. MTHODES: Des entretiens qualitatifs virtuels semi-structurés ont été réalisés avec des participants issus de communautés rurales du Canada entre décembre 2021 et février 2022 inclus. Le recrutement des participants a consisté à identifier des contacts de base et à procéder à un échantillonnage boule de neige. Les participants ont été interrogés sur leurs expériences durant la pandémie de COVID-19, notamment sur le rôle du leadership des médecins dans le renforcement de la résilience des communautés. La collecte des données s'est achevée après saturation théorique. Les données ont été analysées thématiquement à l'aide de NVivo 12. RSULTATS: Soixante-quatre participants provenant de 22 communautés rurales de quatre provinces ont pris part à l'étude. Quatre facteurs clés ont été identifiés pour soutenir le leadership des médecins en faveur de la résilience rurale en cas de perturbation de l'écosystème: (1) la continuité des soins, (2) les modèles de soins en équipe, (3) le bien-être des médecins et (4) l'ouverture à des modèles de soins novateurs. CONCLUSION: La politique de santé et la transformation des pratiques devraient donner la priorité au développement d'opportunités pour renforcer le leadership des médecins, en particulier dans les zones rurales qui seront négativement affectées par la perturbation de l'écosystème.


COVID-19 , Leadership , Pandemics , Qualitative Research , Rural Health Services , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Canada , Rural Health Services/organization & administration , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Physicians, Family , Female , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Betacoronavirus , Ecosystem , Male , Rural Population
16.
Anal Chem ; 96(19): 7360-7366, 2024 May 14.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38697955

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which has witnessed over 772 million confirmed cases and over 6 million deaths globally, the outbreak of COVID-19 has emerged as a significant medical challenge affecting both affluent and impoverished nations. Therefore, there is an urgent need to explore the disease mechanism and to implement rapid detection methods. To address this, we employed the desorption separation ionization (DSI) device in conjunction with a mass spectrometer for the efficient detection and screening of COVID-19 urine samples. The study encompassed patients with COVID-19, healthy controls (HC), and patients with other types of pneumonia (OP) to evaluate their urine metabolomic profiles. Subsequently, we identified the differentially expressed metabolites in the COVID-19 patients and recognized amino acid metabolism as the predominant metabolic pathway involved. Furthermore, multiple established machine learning algorithms validated the exceptional performance of the metabolites in discriminating the COVID-19 group from healthy subjects, with an area under the curve of 0.932 in the blind test set. This study collectively suggests that the small-molecule metabolites detected from urine using the DSI device allow for rapid screening of COVID-19, taking just three minutes per sample. This approach has the potential to expand our understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of COVID-19 and offers a way to rapidly screen patients with COVID-19 through the utilization of machine learning algorithms.


COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/urine , COVID-19/virology , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Pandemics , Male , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/urine , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Middle Aged , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/urine , Female , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , Mass Spectrometry/methods , Adult , Metabolomics/methods , Aged , Machine Learning
17.
J Nanobiotechnology ; 22(1): 304, 2024 May 31.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38822339

Nanobodies, single-domain antibodies derived from variable domain of camelid or shark heavy-chain antibodies, have unique properties with small size, strong binding affinity, easy construction in versatile formats, high neutralizing activity, protective efficacy, and manufactural capacity on a large-scale. Nanobodies have been arisen as an effective research tool for development of nanobiotechnologies with a variety of applications. Three highly pathogenic coronaviruses (CoVs), SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV, have caused serious outbreaks or a global pandemic, and continue to post a threat to public health worldwide. The viral spike (S) protein and its cognate receptor-binding domain (RBD), which initiate viral entry and play a critical role in virus pathogenesis, are important therapeutic targets. This review describes pathogenic human CoVs, including viral structures and proteins, and S protein-mediated viral entry process. It also summarizes recent advances in development of nanobodies targeting these CoVs, focusing on those targeting the S protein and RBD. Finally, we discuss potential strategies to improve the efficacy of nanobodies against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants and other CoVs with pandemic potential. It will provide important information for rational design and evaluation of therapeutic agents against emerging and reemerging pathogens.


COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Single-Domain Antibodies , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus , Single-Domain Antibodies/immunology , Single-Domain Antibodies/pharmacology , Single-Domain Antibodies/therapeutic use , Single-Domain Antibodies/chemistry , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/chemistry , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/metabolism , Animals , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/therapy , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus/immunology , Virus Internalization/drug effects , Pandemics , Betacoronavirus/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/therapeutic use , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/therapeutic use
18.
Bioorg Chem ; 147: 107379, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38643567

Coronaviruses are a group of enveloped viruses with non-segmented, single-stranded, and positive-sense RNA genomes. It belongs to the 'Coronaviridae family', responsible for various diseases, including the common cold, SARS, and MERS. The COVID-19 pandemic, which began in March 2020, has affected 209 countries, infected over a million people, and claimed over 50,000 lives. Significant efforts have been made by repurposing several approved drugs including antiviral, to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. Molnupiravir is found to be the first orally acting efficacious drug to treat COVID-19 cases. It was approved for medical use in the UK in November 2021 and other countries, including USFDA, which granted approval an emergency use authorization (EUA) for treating adults with mild to moderate COVID-19 patients. Considering the importance of molnupiravir, the present review deals with its various synthetic strategies, pharmacokinetics, bio-efficacy, toxicity, and safety profiles. The comprehensive information along with critical analysis will be very handy for a wide range of audience including medicinal chemists in the arena of antiviral drug discovery especially anti-viral drugs against any variant of COVID-19.


Antiviral Agents , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , COVID-19 , Cytidine , Hydroxylamines , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Antiviral Agents/chemistry , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/chemical synthesis , Hydroxylamines/therapeutic use , Hydroxylamines/chemistry , Hydroxylamines/pharmacology , COVID-19/virology , SARS-CoV-2/drug effects , Cytidine/analogs & derivatives , Cytidine/therapeutic use , Cytidine/pharmacology , Cytidine/chemistry , Cytidine/chemical synthesis , Uridine/pharmacology , Uridine/analogs & derivatives , Uridine/chemical synthesis , Uridine/chemistry , Uridine/therapeutic use , Pandemics , Betacoronavirus/drug effects , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy
19.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(4): e247965, 2024 Apr 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38652474

Importance: Numerous studies have provided evidence for the negative associations of the COVID-19 pandemic with mental health, but data on the use of psychotropic medication in children and adolescents after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic are lacking. Objective: To assess the rates and trends of psychotropic medication prescribing before and over the 2 years after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in children and adolescents in France. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used nationwide interrupted time-series analysis of outpatient drug dispensing data from the IQVIA X-ponent database. All 8 839 143 psychotropic medication prescriptions dispensed to children (6 to 11 years of age) and adolescents (12 to 17 years of age) between January 2016 and May 2022 in France were retrieved and analyzed. Exposure: Onset of COVID-19 pandemic. Main outcomes and Measures: Monthly rates of psychotropic medication prescriptions per 1000 children and adolescents were analyzed using a quasi-Poisson regression before and after the pandemic onset (March 2020), and percentage changes in rates and trends were assessed. After the pandemic onset, rate ratios (RRs) were calculated between estimated and expected monthly prescription rates. Analyses were stratified by psychotropic medication class (antipsychotic, anxiolytic, hypnotic and sedative, antidepressant, and psychostimulant) and age group (children, adolescents). Results: In total, 8 839 143 psychotropic medication prescriptions were analyzed, 5 884 819 [66.6%] for adolescents and 2 954 324 [33.4%] for children. In January 2016, the estimated rate of monthly psychotropic medication prescriptions was 9.9 per 1000 children and adolescents, with the prepandemic rate increasing by 0.4% per month (95% CI, 0.3%-0.4%). In March 2020, the monthly prescription rate dropped by 11.5% (95% CI, -17.7% to -4.9%). During the 2 years following the pandemic onset, the trend changed significantly, and the prescription rate increased by 1.3% per month (95% CI, 1.2%-1.5%), reaching 16.1 per 1000 children and adolescents in May 2022. Monthly rates of psychotropic medication prescriptions exceeded the expected rates by 11% (RR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.08-1.14]). Increases in prescribing trends were observed for all psychotropic medication classes after the pandemic onset but were substantial for anxiolytics, hypnotics and sedatives, and antidepressants. Prescription rates rose above those expected for all psychotropic medication classes except psychostimulants (RR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.09-1.15] in adolescents and 1.06 [95% CI, 1.05-1.07] in children for antipsychotics; RR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.25-1.35] in adolescents and 1.11 [95% CI, 1.09-1.12] in children for anxiolytics; RR, 2.50 [95% CI, 2.23-2.77] in adolescents and 1.40 [95% CI, 1.30-1.50] in children for hypnotics and sedatives; RR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.29-1.47] in adolescents and 1.23 [95% CI, 1.20-1.25] in children for antidepressants; and RR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.95-0.98] in adolescents and 1.02 [95% CI, 1.00-1.04] in children for psychostimulants). Changes were more pronounced among adolescents than children. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that prescribing of psychotropic medications for children and adolescents in France significantly and persistently increased after the COVID-19 pandemic onset. Future research should identify underlying determinants to improve psychological trajectories in young people.


COVID-19 , Pandemics , Psychotropic Drugs , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Child , Adolescent , COVID-19/epidemiology , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Male , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , France/epidemiology , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Interrupted Time Series Analysis , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Betacoronavirus , Anti-Anxiety Agents/therapeutic use , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Mental Disorders/epidemiology
20.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(4): e247818, 2024 Apr 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38652477

Importance: Self-report surveys suggest that long-lasting taste deficits may occur after SARS-CoV-2 infection, influencing nutrition, safety, and quality of life. However, self-reports of taste dysfunction are inaccurate, commonly reflecting deficits due to olfactory not taste system pathology; hence, quantitative testing is needed to verify the association of post-COVID-19 condition with taste function. Objective: To use well-validated self-administered psychophysical tests to investigate the association of COVID-19 with long-term outcomes in taste and smell function. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationwide cross-sectional study included individuals with and without a prior history of COVID-19 recruited from February 2020 to August 2023 from a social media website (Reddit) and bulletin board advertisements. In the COVID-19 cohort, there was a mean of 395 days (95% CI, 363-425 days) between diagnosis and testing. Exposure: History of COVID-19. Main Outcomes and Measures: The 53-item Waterless Empirical Taste Test (WETT) and 40-item University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) were used to assess taste and smell function. Total WETT and UPSIT scores and WETT subtest scores of sucrose, citric acid, sodium chloride, caffeine, and monosodium glutamate were assessed for groups with and without a COVID-19 history. The association of COVID-19 with taste and smell outcomes was assessed using analysis of covariance, χ2, and Fisher exact probability tests. Results: Tests were completed by 340 individuals with prior COVID-19 (128 males [37.6%] and 212 females [62.4%]; mean [SD] age, 39.04 [14.35] years) and 434 individuals with no such history (154 males [35.5%] and 280 females [64.5%]; mean (SD) age, 39.99 [15.61] years). Taste scores did not differ between individuals with and without previous COVID-19 (total WETT age- and sex-adjusted mean score, 33.41 [95% CI, 32.37-34.45] vs 33.46 [95% CI, 32.54-34.38]; P = .94). In contrast, UPSIT scores were lower in the group with previous COVID-19 than the group without previous COVID-19 (mean score, 34.39 [95% CI, 33.86-34.92] vs 35.86 [95% CI, 35.39-36.33]; P < .001]); 103 individuals with prior COVID-19 (30.3%) and 91 individuals without prior COVID-19 (21.0%) had some degree of dysfunction (odds ratio, 1.64 [95% CI, 1.18-2.27]). The SARS-CoV-2 variant present at the time of infection was associated with smell outcomes; individuals with original untyped and Alpha variant infections exhibited more loss than those with other variant infections; for example, total to severe loss occurred in 10 of 42 individuals with Alpha variant infections (23.8%) and 7 of 52 individuals with original variant infections (13.5%) compared with 12 of 434 individuals with no COVID-19 history (2.8%) (P < .001 for all). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, taste dysfunction as measured objectively was absent 1 year after exposure to COVID-19 while some smell loss remained in nearly one-third of individuals with this exposure, likely explaining taste complaints of many individuals with post-COVID-19 condition. Infection with earlier untyped and Alpha variants was associated with the greatest degree of smell loss.


COVID-19 , Olfaction Disorders , SARS-CoV-2 , Taste Disorders , Humans , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Male , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adult , Taste Disorders/etiology , Taste Disorders/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Olfaction Disorders/etiology , Olfaction Disorders/epidemiology , Taste/physiology , Smell/physiology , Pandemics , Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/physiopathology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/physiopathology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Self Report , Aged
...