Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 570
Filter
1.
Am J Case Rep ; 25: e943882, 2024 Aug 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39127886

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND Hereditary breast cancer arising in BRCA1-deficient patients is commonly diagnosed as invasive carcinoma of no special type (NST) with medullary features, while invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) appears to be significantly under-represented in BRCA1 mutation carriers. We report a case of pleomorphic ILC arising in a 28-year-old woman harboring a germline BRCA1 c.3756_3759delGTCT p.(Ser1253Argfs*10) pathogenic variant. CASE REPORT A nulliparous 28-year-old woman with a family history of BRCA1 mutation presented to the symptomatic breast clinic with a several-week history of a left 80-mm breast lump. Core biopsy established a diagnosis of a poorly differentiated triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) of pleomorphic lobular phenotype. Her clinical diagnosis was cT3, N0, M0, cStageIIB. The MDT recommended CT staging, MRI breast imaging and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). PET CT imaging showed no evidence of distant metastatic disease. The patient had a good radiological response to NACT with a FEC-T carboplatin regimen. Post-NACT imaging showed a residual cystic mass and the patient underwent a mastectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy with plans for a delayed latissimus dorsi reconstruction following her adjuvant radiotherapy treatment. A complete pathological response was subsequently demonstrated without any evidence of metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS This case is the first report of pleomorphic ILC with a triple-negative receptor status and a complete pathological response in a BRCA1 mutation carrier. Our study expands the heterogeneous spectrum of TNBC and contributes to a better understanding of the molecular genetic landscape that characterizes invasive pleomorphic lobular neoplasia.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Lobular , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Carcinoma, Lobular/genetics , Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology , Carcinoma, Lobular/therapy , BRCA1 Protein/genetics , Germ-Line Mutation
2.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 19477, 2024 08 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39174612

ABSTRACT

Invasive lobular breast carcinoma (ILC) is one potential subset that "clinicopathologic features" can conflict with "long-term outcome" and the optimal management strategy is unknown in such discordant situations. The present study aims to predict the long-term, overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of ILC. The clinical information of patients with non-metastatic ILC was retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2020. A total of 31451 patients were enrolled and divided into the training cohort (n=22,017) and validation cohort (n=9434). The last follow-up was December, 31, 2020 and the median follow-up period was 99 months (1-203). Age, marriage, estrogen (ER) status, progesterone (PR) status, grade, tumor size, lymph node ratio (LNR) and combined summary (CS) stage were prognostic factors for both OS and CSS of ILC, whereas chemotherapy and radiation were independent protect factors for OS. The nomograms exhibited satisfactory discriminative ability. For the training and validation cohorts, the C-index of the OS nomogram was 0.765 (95% CI 0.762-0.768) and 0.757 (95% CI 0.747-0.767), and the C-index of the CSS nomogram were 0.812 (95% CI 0.804-0.820) and 0.813 (95% CI 0.799-0.827), respectively. Additionally, decision curve analysis (DCA) demonstrated that the nomograms had superior predictive performance than traditional American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM stage. The novel nomograms to predict long-term prognosis based on LNR are reliable tools to predict survival, which may assist clinicians in identifying high-risk patients and devising individual treatments for patients with ILC. Our findings should aid public health prevention strategies to reduce cancer burden. We provide two R/Shiny apps ( https://ilc-survival2024.shinyapps.io/osnomogram/ ; https://ilc-survival2024.shinyapps.io/cssnomogram/ ) to visualize findings.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Lobular , Nomograms , SEER Program , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology , Carcinoma, Lobular/therapy , Carcinoma, Lobular/mortality , Aged , Adult
3.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1422342, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39076998

ABSTRACT

Invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) is characterized by a relatively high risk for late recurrence and a unique metastatic pattern with an increased risk for metastasis to gynecologic organs and peritoneum. We present a unique case of recurrent ILC with metastasis to the abdominal peritoneum as well as the uterine myometrium and cervix. Treatment was complicated by the discovery of concomitant uterine carcinosarcoma. This patient was effectively treated with a combination of hormonal therapy for her metastatic ILC and a combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy for uterine carcinosarcoma. Molecular evaluation revealed a characteristic CDH1 mutation within the ILC and a PI3KCA mutation within the uterine carcinosarcoma, both of which have been linked to epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions. Examination of the tumor immune microenvironment revealed proportionally more cytotoxic NK cells. This robust immune infiltration may be an indicator of the response to immunotherapy observed in this tumor or a result of the metastatic breast cancer within the uterus. This report provides a characterization of the molecular and immunologic landscape in this case with metastatic ILC and uterine carcinosarcoma.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Lobular , Carcinosarcoma , Immunotherapy , Uterine Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Carcinosarcoma/therapy , Carcinosarcoma/immunology , Carcinosarcoma/genetics , Uterine Neoplasms/therapy , Uterine Neoplasms/genetics , Uterine Neoplasms/immunology , Uterine Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Lobular/immunology , Carcinoma, Lobular/therapy , Carcinoma, Lobular/secondary , Carcinoma, Lobular/genetics , Immunotherapy/methods , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Breast Neoplasms/immunology , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Middle Aged , Antigens, CD/genetics , Antigens, CD/immunology , Mutation , Tumor Microenvironment/immunology , Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases/genetics , Cadherins/genetics , Killer Cells, Natural/immunology
4.
Semin Oncol ; 51(3-4): 106-122, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38897820

ABSTRACT

Invasive lobular cancer (ILC) is the most common of the breast cancer special types, accounting for up to 15% of all breast malignancies. The distinctive biological features of ILC include the loss of the cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin, which drives the tumor's peculiar discohesive growth pattern, with cells arranged in single file and dispersed throughout the stroma. Typically, such tumors originate in the lobules, are more commonly bilateral compared to invasive ductal cancer (IDC) and require a more accurate diagnostic examination through imaging. They are luminal in molecular subtype, and exhibit estrogen and progesterone receptor positivity and HER2 negativity, thus presenting a more unpredictable response to neoadjuvant therapies. There has been a significant increase in research focused on this distinctive breast cancer subtype, including studies on its pathology, its clinical and surgical management, and the high-resolution definition of its genomic profile, as well as the development of new therapeutic perspectives. This review will summarize the heterogeneous pattern of this unique disease, focusing on challenges in its comprehensive clinical management and on future insights and research objectives.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Lobular , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Female , Carcinoma, Lobular/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Lobular/therapy , Carcinoma, Lobular/genetics , Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology
5.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 22(2D)2024 May 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38744306

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although considered a favorable subtype, pure mucinous breast cancer (PMBC) can recur, and evidence for adjuvant therapy is limited. We aimed to compare outcomes of nonmetastatic PMBC with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) to address these uncertainties. METHODS: Individual patient-level data from 6 centers on stage I-III hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative PMBC, IDC, and ILC were used to analyze recurrence-free interval (RFI), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS), and to identify prognostic factors for PMBC. RESULTS: Data from 20,684 IDC cases, 1,475 ILC cases, and 943 PMBC cases were used. Median follow-up was 6.6 years. Five-year RFI, RFS, and OS for PMBC were 96.1%, 94.9%, and 98.1%, respectively. On multivariable Cox regression, PMBC demonstrated superior RFI (hazard ratio [HR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.43-0.80), RFS (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.56-0.89), and OS (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53-0.96) compared with IDC. ILC showed comparable outcomes to IDC. Fewer than half (48.7%) of recurrences in PMBC were distant, which was a lower rate than for IDC (67.3%) and ILC (80.6%). In contrast to RFI, RFS events were driven more by non-breast cancer deaths in older patients. Significant prognostic factors for RFI among PMBC included positive lymph node(s) (HR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.08-5.40), radiotherapy (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.23-0.85), and endocrine therapy (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.09-0.70). No differential chemotherapy associations with outcomes were detected across PMBC subgroups by nodal stage, tumor size, and age. A separate SEER database analysis also did not find any association of improved survival with adjuvant chemotherapy in these subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with IDC, PMBC demonstrated superior RFI, RFS, and OS. Lymph node negativity, adjuvant radiotherapy, and endocrine therapy were associated with superior RFI. Adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with better outcomes.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous , Breast Neoplasms , Receptor, ErbB-2 , Receptors, Estrogen , Humans , Female , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Middle Aged , Aged , Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/therapy , Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/pathology , Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/metabolism , Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/mortality , Prognosis , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Adult , Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism , Neoplasm Staging , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/therapy , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/mortality , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/metabolism , Cohort Studies , Carcinoma, Lobular/therapy , Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology , Carcinoma, Lobular/metabolism , Carcinoma, Lobular/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology
6.
Mod Pathol ; 37(5): 100463, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38428737

ABSTRACT

Invasive lobular carcinomas (ILCs) have a low frequency of ERBB2 amplification, therefore restricting the use of conventional anti-HER2 therapies for this histologic special type. Conversely, ILCs with low HER2 overexpression may represent a broader target for the use of emerging antibody drug conjugate therapies targeting HER2, since these treatments have proven effective in HER2-low breast cancers. Very scarce data about HER2-low ILCs have been so far published, although these tumors could have different prevalence and histomolecular specificities compared with invasive breast carcinoma of no special type (IBC-NST). Our aims in that context were to decipher the clinicopathological and molecular features of a large series of HER2-low ILCs. Comparative evaluation of HER2-low prevalence was done based on a retrospective series of 7970 patients from Institut Curie, with either primary invasive lobular (N = 1103) or no special type (N = 6867) invasive carcinoma. Clinicopathological and molecular analyses of HER2-zero, HER2-low, and HER2-positive ILCs were performed on a subgroup of 251 patients who underwent surgery for a primary ILC between 2005 and 2008. The mutational profile of these 251 cases was determined from RNAseq data. Compared with HER2-negative IBC-NSTs, the HER2-negative ILCs were found to display a higher frequency of HER2-zero cases (59.4% vs 53.7%) and a lower frequency of HER2-low (40.6% vs 46.3%) (P < .001). Clinicopathological features associated with HER2-low status (vs HER2-zero) in ILC were older age, postmenopausal status, nonclassic ILC histological types, higher grade, proliferation, and estrogen receptor expression levels. Survival curve analysis showed a significantly lower risk of local recurrence for HER2-low (vs HER2-zero) ILCs, but no association was found between HER2 status and either breast cancer-specific survival or distant metastasis-free interval. ERBB3 was the unique mutated gene exclusively associated with HER2-low ILCs yet being mutated at a low frequency (7.1%) (false discovery rate < 0.05). In conclusion, HER2-low ILCs exhibit their own particularities, both on clinical-pathological and molecular levels. Our findings call for larger multicenter validation studies.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor , Breast Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Lobular , Receptor, ErbB-2 , Humans , Female , Carcinoma, Lobular/genetics , Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology , Carcinoma, Lobular/metabolism , Carcinoma, Lobular/therapy , Carcinoma, Lobular/drug therapy , Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Middle Aged , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Adult , Mutation , Aged, 80 and over
7.
Pathol Res Pract ; 254: 155100, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38277744

ABSTRACT

Phyllodes tumor (PT) of the breast is a biphasic neoplasia composed of mesenchymal and epithelial cells. PTs are graded as benign, borderline or malignant according to histological criteria. Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is a special breast cancer subtype defined by non-cohesive growth and loss of E-cadherin. PT is treated by resection. ILC is treated by resection and adjuvant endocrine therapy with or without chemotherapy. Collision tumors composed of PT and concurrent ILC are rare. Due to their dissociated growth, ILC cells may escape histologic detection when admixed with PTs. Here we report the case of a 71-years-old female diagnosed with a PT/ILC collision tumor. The patient presented with a tumor in the right breast. A core needle biopsy showed mesenchymal spindle cell proliferates suspicious for a PT. The resection specimen confirmed a malignant PT with stromal overgrowth. Unexpectedly, the resection specimen also revealed sparse infiltrates of ILC admixed with the PT. Immunohistochemistry of mesenchymal PT cells and ILC cells was consistent with the histomorphological diagnosis. Molecular analyses demonstrated a IDH1 variant of unknown significance and GNAS gene mutation in microdissected PT tissue. ILC tissue showed wild-type IDH1 and GNAS, but harbored CDH1/E-cadherin and TP53 gene mutations, arguing against clonal relatedness of the two lesions. Review of the literature identified six reported PT/ILC collision tumors, involving three benign, two borderline and one malignant PT. In summary, this is the second report on a malignant PT/ILC collision tumor. Correct histologic diagnosis of PT/ILC collision tumors is clinically relevant, because adjuvant endocrine therapy is mandatory for ILC.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Lobular , Phyllodes Tumor , Female , Humans , Aged , Phyllodes Tumor/genetics , Phyllodes Tumor/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast/pathology , Biopsy, Large-Core Needle , Cadherins/genetics , Carcinoma, Lobular/genetics , Carcinoma, Lobular/therapy , Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology
8.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(11): e2342270, 2023 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37938845

ABSTRACT

Importance: The disparate prognostic implications between invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) have been demonstrated. However, information on premenopausal patients remains insufficient. Objective: To examine long-term survival outcomes of ILC and IDC in premenopausal patients using national databases. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER), Korean Breast Cancer Registry (KBCR), and Asan Medical Center Research (AMCR) databases to identify premenopausal patients with stage I to III ILC or IDC between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2015. The median follow-up time was 90 (IQR, 40-151) months in the SEER database, 94 (IQR, 65-131) months in the KBCR database, and 120 (IQR, 86-164) months in the AMCR database. Data were analyzed from January 1 to May 31, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), which was analyzed according to histological type, and the annual hazard rate was evaluated. Survival rates were analyzed using a log-rank test and a Cox proportional hazards regression model with time-varying coefficients. Multivariable analysis was performed by adjusting for tumor characteristics and treatment factors. Results: A total of 225 938 women diagnosed with IDC or ILC and younger than 50 years were identified. Mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 42.7 (5.3) years in the SEER database, 41.8 (5.5) years in the KBCR database, and 41.8 (5.5) years in the AMCR database. In terms of race (available for the SEER database only), 12.4% of patients were Black, 76.1% were White, 11.0% were of other race (including American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander), and 0.5% were of unknown race). Patients with ILC had better BCSS in the first 10 years after diagnosis than those with IDC (hazard ratios [HRs], 0.73 [95% CI, 0.68-0.78] in the SEER database, 1.20 [95% CI, 0.91-1.58] in the KBCR database, and 0.50 [95% CI, 0.29-0.86] in the AMCR database), although BCSS was worse after year 10 (HRs, 1.80 [95% CI, 1.59-2.02] in the SEER database, 2.79 [95% CI, 1.32-5.88] in the KBCR database, and 2.23 [95% CI, 1.04-4.79] in the AMCR database). Similar trends were observed for hormone receptor-positive tumors (HRs, 1.55 [95% CI, 1.37-1.75] in the SEER database, 2.27 [95% CI, 1.01-5.10] in the KBCR database, and 2.12 [95% CI, 0.98-4.60] in the AMCR database). Considering the annual hazard model of BCSS, IDC events tended to decline steadily after peaking 5 years before diagnosis. However, the annual peak event of BCSS was observed 5 years after diagnosis for ILC, which subsequently remained constant. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that premenopausal women with ILC have worse BCSS estimates than those with IDC, which can be attributed to a higher late recurrence rate of ILC than that of IDC. Histological subtypes should be considered when determining the type and duration of endocrine therapy in premenopausal women.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast , Carcinoma, Lobular , Humans , Female , Carcinoma, Lobular/therapy , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/therapy , Cohort Studies , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prognosis
9.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 201(3): 397-408, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37479943

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Many studies have shown that the prognosis of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is better than that of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). However, both disorders exhibit different prognoses according to molecular subtype, and the prognosis of ILC subtypes might depend on their hormone receptor positivity rate. This study clarified the prognosis of ILC and IDC in each subtype and examined the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in luminal ILC. METHODS: We planned the analysis using data from the Breast Cancer Registry in Japan. Because it was presumed that there are differences in characteristics between ILC and IDC, we created matched cohorts using exact matching to compare their prognoses. We compared the prognosis of ILC and IDC for each subtype. We also compared the prognosis of luminal ILC between the CT and non-CT groups. RESULTS: For all subtypes, the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of ILC were poorer than those of IDC. In the analysis by each subtype, no statistically significant difference was found in DFS and OS in luminal human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2), HER2, and triple-negative cohorts; however, luminal ILC had significantly poorer DFS and OS than luminal IDC. The CT effects on the prognosis of luminal ILC were greater in more advanced cases. CONCLUSION: Luminal ILC had a poorer prognosis than luminal IDC, contributing to the worse prognosis of ILC than that of IDC in the overall cohort. Different therapeutic approaches from luminal IDC are essential for a better prognosis of luminal ILC.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Lobular , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Carcinoma, Lobular/therapy , East Asian People , Prognosis , Registries
10.
PLoS One ; 18(7): e0283445, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37428725

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The literature contains different information about the prognosis of invasive lobular carcinoma of breast cancer (BC). We aimed to address the inconsistency by comparatively examining the clinical features and prognosis of invasive lobular carcinoma patients in our university and to report our experience by dividing our patients into various subgroups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Records of patients with BC admitted to Trakya University School of Medicine Department of Oncology between July 1999 and December 2021 were reviewed. The patients were divided into three groups (No-Special Type BC, Invasive Lobular Special Type BC, No-Lobular Special Type BC). Patient characteristics, treatment methods and oncological results are presented. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Statistical significance of survival among the selected variables was compared by using the log-rank test. RESULTS: The patients in our study consisted of 2142 female and 15 male BC patients. There were 1814 patients with No-Special Type BC, 193 patients with Invasive Lobular Special Type BC, and 150 patients with No-Lobular Special Type BC. The duration of disease-free survival (DFS) was 226.5 months for the No-Special Type BC group, 216.7 months for the No-Lobular Special Type BC group, and 197.2 months for the Invasive Lobular Special Type BC group, whereas the duration of overall survival (OS) was 233.2 months for the No-Special Type BC group, 227.9 for the No-Lobular Special Type BC group, and 209.8 for the Invasive Lobular Special Type BC group. The duration of both DFS and OS was the lowest in the Invasive Lobular Special Type BC group. Multivariate factors that were significant risk factors for OS were Invasive Lobular Special Type BC histopathology (p = .045), T stage, N stage, stage, skin infiltration, positive surgical margins, high histological grade, and mitotic index. Modified radical mastectomy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and use of tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors for more than 5 years were significant protective factors for overall survival. CONCLUSION: The histopathological subgroup with the worst prognosis in our study was Invasive Lobular Special Type BC. Duration of DFS and OS were significantly shorter in Invasive Lobular Special Type BC than No-Lobular Special Type BC group. The classification of Invasive Lobular BC under the title of Special Type BC should be reconsidered and a more accurate treatment and follow-up process may be required.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms, Male , Breast Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast , Carcinoma, Ductal , Carcinoma, Lobular , Humans , Female , Male , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Lobular/therapy , Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology , Mastectomy , Treatment Outcome , Prognosis , Breast Neoplasms, Male/surgery , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Retrospective Studies
11.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 32(8): 1107-1113, 2023 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37257200

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although investigators have shown associations between socioeconomic status (SES) and outcomes in breast cancer, there is a paucity of such data for invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), the second most common type of breast cancer. Herein we evaluated the relationship between SES with tumor features and outcomes in stage I to III patients with ILC. METHODS: We analyzed a prospectively maintained institutional ILC database and utilized the area deprivation index (ADI) to determine neighborhood adversity, an indicator of SES. We used Cox proportional hazards models in Stata 17.0 to evaluate relationships between ADI quintile (Q), race, body mass index (BMI), clinicopathologic features, treatment type, and event-free survival (EFS). RESULTS: Of 804 patients with ILC, 21.4% lived in neighborhoods classified as ADI Q1 (least resource-deprived) and 19.7% in Q5 (most resource-deprived). Higher deprivation was significantly associated with larger tumor size (3.6 cm in Q5 vs. 3.1 cm in Q1), increased presence of lymphovascular invasion (8.9% in Q5 vs. 6.7% in Q1), and decreased use of adjuvant endocrine therapy (67.1% in Q5 vs. 73.6% in Q1). On multivariable analysis, tumor size, receptor subtypes, and omission of adjuvant endocrine therapy were associated with reduced EFS. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that patients with ILC and higher ADI experience more aggressive tumors and differences in treatment. More data evaluating the complex relationships between these factors is needed to optimize outcomes for patients with ILC, regardless of SES. IMPACT: ADI is associated with differences in patients with ILC.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast , Carcinoma, Lobular , Social Deprivation , Female , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/therapy , Carcinoma, Lobular/therapy , Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology , Progression-Free Survival , Retrospective Studies , Residence Characteristics , Socioeconomic Factors , Healthcare Disparities , Middle Aged
13.
BMC Womens Health ; 23(1): 133, 2023 03 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36966290

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Chinese women topped the list of new breast cancers, the first diagnosed gastric metastasis and bone metastasis is extremely infrequent. The clinical and pathological diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer is difficult. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of the first diagnosis of breast cancer with both gastric metastasis and bone metastasis. CASE REPORT: The female patient was found to have abdominal distension for 15 days with nausea and vomiting. The patient underwent a gastroscopy at an outside hospital 4 days ago, showing: duodenal bulb changes, gastric retention and chronic non-atrophic gastritis. Gastroscopic biopsy showed chronic inflammation and edema of the duodenal mucosa with glandular hyperplasia. Conservative treatment was given with no relief of symptoms. She was seen in our hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery department. After admission, palliative surgery was performed, and the swelling and surrounding involved tissues were taken for examination during surgery. The rapid pathological return could not exclude tumor lesions, and the postoperative pathology confirmed the diagnosis of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast with gastric metastases, and the systemic examination revealed combined bone metastases. DIAGNOSIS: Pathology and immunohistochemistry(IHC), a whole-body bone scan confirmed the first diagnosis of breast cancer with both gastric and bone metastases. INTERVENTIONS: Palliative treatment with bisphosphonates and CDK4/6i (Palbociclib) in combination with AI (Exemestane) was administered. OUTCOMES: The patient is currently under regular evaluation and is being followed up.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Lobular , Female , Humans , Carcinoma, Lobular/therapy , Carcinoma, Lobular/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Biopsy
14.
Am Surg ; 89(8): 3543-3544, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36877148

ABSTRACT

The histiocytoid variant of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is a rare subtype of breast cancer that can be challenging to diagnose and aggressive in nature. It is often diagnosed after the disease has metastasized. This report describes a case of a six-centimeter ILC of the histiocytoid subtype. The patient is a 66-year-old female who was initially told that she had dense breast tissue. At the time of diagnosis, she had a large mass and was found to have metastases to the axillary lymph nodes and vertebra. She was started on chemotherapy and immunotherapy, but has since developed multiple new lesions to her spine, rib, and femur. This case highlights the aggressive nature of this variant, which progressed while during treatment.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast , Carcinoma, Lobular , Humans , Female , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Lobular/therapy , Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology , Breast Density , Mammography , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology
16.
Clin Breast Cancer ; 23(3): e173-e174, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36586733

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: It is still relatively questioned if the benefit of Recurrent Score (RS) extends to invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), which represents 10-15% of all invasive Breast Cancer (BC). We present the results of the lobular carcinoma subgroup of the PONDx Italy study[1]. that collected data on real-life use of the Oncotype DX® test in Italian oncological community clinical practice. METHODS: We present the results of the lobular carcinoma subgroup of the PONDx Italy study that collected data on real-life use of the Oncotype DX® test in Italian oncological community clinical practice. The study primarily evaluated the impact of the Oncotype DX assay results on physicians' treatment decisions. In the primary analysis, data from 1724 BC patients who underwent Oncotype DX testing were available from 27 reference centers located in 6 regions of Italy (Lombardia, Lazio, Emilia Romagna, Campania, Abruzzo, and Marche). RESULTS: Among patients with data available, 214 had ILC. In this cohort, 100 (47%) of patients with ILC had treatment recommendations for CT + HT before the availability of their RS result. After the availability of the RS result, recommendations for CT+HT decreased to 47 cases (22%). CONCLUSION: the decision to opt for the Oncotype Dx test should not be based on the histology subgroup only because a small population of ER+ ILC BC patients may still attain important information from testing. Despite this information, its predictive value needs more dedicated trials to be confirmed.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Lobular , Humans , Female , Carcinoma, Lobular/genetics , Carcinoma, Lobular/therapy , Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnosis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/genetics , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Gene Expression Profiling/methods
18.
Ann Oncol ; 33(8): 769-785, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35605746

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) is the second most common type of breast cancer after invasive breast cancer of no special type (NST), representing up to 15% of all breast cancers. DESIGN: Latest data on ILC are presented, focusing on diagnosis, molecular make-up according to the European Society for Medical Oncology Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT) guidelines, treatment in the early and metastatic setting and ILC-focused clinical trials. RESULTS: At the imaging level, magnetic resonance imaging-based and novel positron emission tomography/computed tomography-based techniques can overcome the limitations of currently used imaging techniques for diagnosing ILC. At the pathology level, E-cadherin immunohistochemistry could help improving inter-pathologist agreement. The majority of patients with ILC do not seem to benefit as much from (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy as patients with NST, although chemotherapy might be required in a subset of high-risk patients. No differences in treatment efficacy are seen for anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapies in the adjuvant setting and cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors in the metastatic setting. The clinical utility of the commercially available prognostic gene expression-based tests is unclear for patients with ILC. Several ESCAT alterations differ in frequency between ILC and NST. Germline BRCA1 and PALB2 alterations are less frequent in patients with ILC, while germline CDH1 (gene coding for E-cadherin) alterations are more frequent in patients with ILC. Somatic HER2 mutations are more frequent in ILC, especially in metastases (15% ILC versus 5% NST). A high tumour mutational burden, relevant for immune checkpoint inhibition, is more frequent in ILC metastases (16%) than in NST metastases (5%). Tumours with somatic inactivating CDH1 mutations may be vulnerable for treatment with ROS1 inhibitors, a concept currently investigated in early and metastatic ILC. CONCLUSION: ILC is a unique malignancy based on its pathological and biological features leading to differences in diagnosis as well as in treatment response, resistance and targets as compared to NST.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast , Carcinoma, Lobular , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Cadherins/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/genetics , Carcinoma, Lobular/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Lobular/genetics , Carcinoma, Lobular/therapy , Female , Humans , Prognosis , Proto-Oncogene Proteins
19.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 194(1): 137-148, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35488092

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) confers increased cancer risk in either breast, but it remains unclear if this population is at increased risk for bilateral breast cancer (BC) development. Here we report bilateral BC incidence among women with a history of LCIS. METHODS: Women with classic-type LCIS diagnosed from 1980 to 2017 who developed unilateral BC (UBC) or bilateral BC were identified. Bilateral BC was categorized as synchronous (bilateral BC diagnosed < 6 months apart; SBBC) or metachronous (bilateral BC diagnosed ≥ 6 months apart; MBBC). Five-year incidence rates of bilateral BC among this population were evaluated. Comparisons were made to identify factors associated with bilateral BC. RESULTS: At 7 years' median follow-up, 249/1651 (15%) women with LCIS developed BC; 34 with bilateral BC (2%). There were no clinicopathologic feature differences between those with UBC and bilateral BC. SBBC occurred in 18 without significant differences versus UBC. Among 211 with UBC and a contralateral breast at risk, 16 developed MBBC at a median follow-up of 3 years. MBBC patients were less likely to receive endocrine therapy and more likely to receive chemotherapy versus UBC. Tumor histology was not associated with MBBC. Estimated 5-year MBBC risk was 6.4%. Index estrogen/progesterone receptor positivity and endocrine therapy were the only factors associated with MBBC risk. CONCLUSION: Bilateral BC occurred in 2% of women with LCIS history at median follow-up of 7 years. Similar to the general BC population, a decrease in MBBC is seen among women with a history of LCIS who develop hormone receptor-positive disease and those who receive endocrine therapy, highlighting the protective effects of this treatment.


Subject(s)
Breast Carcinoma In Situ , Breast Neoplasms , Carcinoma in Situ , Carcinoma, Lobular , Carcinoma , Unilateral Breast Neoplasms , Breast Carcinoma In Situ/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Carcinoma, Lobular/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Lobular/therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Prognosis
20.
Mol Cancer Res ; 20(6): 837-840, 2022 06 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35276005

ABSTRACT

Preclinical model systems are essential research tools that help us understand the biology of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast (ILC). The number of well-established ILC models is increasing but remain limited. Lower incidence of ILC, underrepresentation of patients with ILC in clinical trials, and intrinsic ILC tumor characteristics all contribute to this challenge. Hence, there is significant need to continually develop better model systems to recapitulate the essential characteristics of ILC biology, genetics, and histology, and empower preclinical therapeutic studies to be translated back into the clinic. In this Perspective, we highlight recent advances in in vivo experimental models, which recapitulate key features of ILC biology and disease progression and potentially reshape the future of ILC translational research. We assert that all existing in vitro and in vivo ILC preclinical models have their strengths and weaknesses, and that it is necessary to bridge key deficiencies in each model context as we move forward with ILC research. Thus, unlocking the mysteries of ILC will be best achieved by choosing the right combination of preclinical model systems.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast , Carcinoma, Lobular , Biology , Breast/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Carcinoma, Lobular/genetics , Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology , Carcinoma, Lobular/therapy , Female , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL