Adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors for urothelial carcinoma: systematic review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) among muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC) patients receiving adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) versus placebo/observation following radical surgery. METHODS: This was a systematic review/meta-analysis of all published phase 3 randomized controlled trials. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane were searched from inception until April 4, 2024. Pooled hazard ratios (HR) and relative risks (RR), plus confidence intervals (CI), were generated using frequentist random-effects modeling. RESULTS: Three trials were identified: IMvigor010, CheckMate 274, and AMBASSADOR. In the overall cohort, adjuvant ICIs significantly improved DFS by 23% (HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.65-0.90). No DFS benefit was observed in patients with upper tract disease (HR = 1.19, 95% CI = 0.86-1.64). The highest magnitude of DFS benefit was observed among patients who had received prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR = 0.69) and pathologic node-positive disease (HR = 0.75). A similar DFS benefit was observed irrespective of tumor PD-L1 status. Pooled OS demonstrated a 13% non-significant benefit (HR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.75-1.01). Grade ≥ 3 immune-mediated AEs occurred in 8.6% and 2.1% of ICI and placebo/observation patients, respectively (RR = 4.35, 95% CI = 1.02-18.5). AEs leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 14.3% and 0.9% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant ICIs confer a DFS benefit following radical surgery for MIUC, particularly among node-positive patients and those who received prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The lack of benefit for upper tract disease suggests that alternate adjuvant approaches, including chemotherapy, should be considered for these patients. Tumor PD-L1 status is not a predictive biomarker, highlighting the need for biomarkers in this setting.

A Podcast on Platinum Eligibility and Treatment Sequencing in Platinum-Eligible Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.

The treatment landscape for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma continues to evolve. Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab has received Food and Drug Administration approval based on recent phase 3 trial data showing superior efficacy compared with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy; however, its distinct toxicity profile may make it less suitable for some patients, and availability in some countries may be limited by cost considerations. Consequently, platinum-based chemotherapy is expected to remain an important first-line treatment option. Choice of platinum regimen (cisplatin- or carboplatin-based) is informed by assessment of clinical characteristics, including performance status, kidney function, and presence of peripheral neuropathy or heart failure. For patients without disease progression after completing platinum-based chemotherapy, avelumab first-line maintenance treatment is recommended by international guidelines. For patients who have disease progression, pembrolizumab is the preferred approach. Additionally, following results from a recent phase 3 trial, nivolumab plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy has also received Food and Drug Administration approval and is an additional first-line treatment option for cisplatin-eligible patients. Later-line options for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma, depending on prior treatment, may include enfortumab vedotin, erdafitinib (for patients with FGFR2/3 mutations or fusions/rearrangements), sacituzumab govitecan, and platinum rechallenge. For the small proportion of patients ineligible for any platinum-based chemotherapy (i.e., unsuitable for cisplatin or carboplatin), immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy with pembrolizumab or atezolizumab is a first-line treatment option, although approved agents vary between countries. In summary, this podcast discusses recent developments in the treatment landscape for advanced urothelial carcinoma, eligibility for platinum-based chemotherapy, potential first-line treatment options, and treatment sequencing. Supplementary file1 (MP4 246907 KB).

Epacadostat plus pembrolizumab versus placebo plus pembrolizumab for advanced urothelial carcinoma: results from the randomized phase III ECHO-303/KEYNOTE-698 study.

BACKGROUND: Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) levels correlate with poor outcomes in urothelial carcinoma (UC). IDO1 and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) are often co-expressed. Epacadostat is a potent and highly selective inhibitor of IDO1. In a subgroup analysis of patients with advanced UC participating in a phase I/II study, epacadostat-pembrolizumab treatment produced an objective response rate (ORR) of 35%. METHODS: ECHO-303/KEYNOTE-698 was a double-blinded, randomized phase III study of adults with metastatic or unresectable locally advanced UC with recurrence or progression following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Participants were randomized to epacadostat 100 mg twice daily (BID) plus pembrolizumab or placebo plus pembrolizumab until completion of 35 pembrolizumab infusions, disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed ORR per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. RESULTS: Target enrollment was 648 patients; enrollment was halted early based on efficacy results from the phase III ECHO-301/KEYNOTE-252 study in metastatic melanoma. Forty-two patients were randomized to each treatment arm. Median duration of follow-up was 62 days in each arm. The investigator-assessed ORR (unconfirmed) was 26.2% (95% CI 16.35-48.11) for epacadostat plus pembrolizumab and 11.9% (95% CI 4.67-29.50) for placebo plus pembrolizumab. Two complete responses were reported, both in the placebo-plus-pembrolizumab arm. Circulating kynurenine levels increased from C1D1 to C2D1 in the placebo-plus-pembrolizumab arm and numerically decreased in the epacadostat-plus-pembrolizumab arm. The safety profile of epacadostat plus pembrolizumab was similar to that of pembrolizumab monotherapy, although a numerically greater proportion of patients in the combination vs. control arm experienced treatment-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events (16.7% vs. 7.3%). One patient in each arm died due to cardiovascular events, which were not deemed drug-related. No new safety concerns were identified for either agent. CONCLUSIONS: Epacadostat plus pembrolizumab demonstrated anti-tumor activity and was generally tolerable as second-line treatment of patients with unresectable locally advanced or recurrent/progressive metastatic UC. Epacadostat 100 mg BID, when administered with pembrolizumab, did not normalize circulating kynurenine in most patients. Further study of combined IDO1/PD-L1 inhibition in this patient population, particularly with epacadostat doses that result in durable normalization of circulating kynurenine, may be warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03374488. Registered 12/15/2017.

Pembrolizumab plus either epacadostat or placebo for cisplatin-ineligible urothelial carcinoma: results from the ECHO-307/KEYNOTE-672 study.

BACKGROUND: Indoleamine 2,3- dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) is an immunosuppressive enzyme that has been correlated with shorter disease-specific survival in patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC). IDO1 may counteract the antitumor effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Epacadostat is a potent and highly selective inhibitor of IDO1. In the phase I/II ECHO-202/KEYNOTE-037 study, epacadostat plus pembrolizumab resulted in a preliminary objective response rate (ORR) of 35% in a cohort of patients with advanced UC. METHODS: ECHO-307/KEYNOTE-672 was a double-blinded, randomized, phase III study. Eligible adults had confirmed locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic UC of the urinary tract and were ineligible to receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive epacadostat (100 mg twice daily) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) or placebo plus pembrolizumab for up to 35 pembrolizumab infusions. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed ORR per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1). RESULTS: A total of 93 patients were randomized (epacadostat plus pembrolizumab, n = 44; placebo plus pembrolizumab, n = 49). Enrollment was stopped early due to emerging data from the phase III ECHO-301/KEYNOTE-252 study. The median duration of follow-up was 64 days in both arms. Based on all available data at cutoff, ORR (unconfirmed) was 31.8% (95% CI, 22.46-55.24%) for epacadostat plus pembrolizumab and 24.5% (95% CI, 15.33-43.67%) for placebo plus pembrolizumab. Circulating kynurenine levels numerically increased from C1D1 to C2D1 in the placebo-plus-pembrolizumab arm and decreased in the epacadostat-plus-pembrolizumab arm. Epacadostat-plus-pembrolizumab combination treatment was well tolerated with a safety profile similar to the placebo arm. Treatment discontinuations due to treatment-related adverse events were more frequent with epacadostat (11.6% vs. 4.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with epacadostat plus pembrolizumab resulted in a similar ORR and safety profile as placebo plus pembrolizumab in cisplatin-ineligible patients with previously untreated locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic UC. At a dose of 100 mg twice daily, epacadostat did not appear to completely normalize circulating kynurenine levels when administered with pembrolizumab. Larger studies with longer follow-up and possibly testing higher doses of epacadostat, potentially in different therapy settings, may be warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03361865, retrospectively registered December 5, 2017.

A Fatal Case of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Mediated Myasthenia Gravis, Myositis, and Cardiomyopathy Overlap Syndrome in Urothelial Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have led to improved outcomes for many cancer types. However, their use can also precipitate immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that can affect any organ system. While irAEs are often mild, they rarely affect multiple organ systems concurrently and can be fatal. CASE: We report a fatal case of myasthenia gravis, myositis, and cardiotoxicity overlap syndrome precipitated by the ICI pembrolizumab along with a brief review of available literature. CONCLUSION: Early recognition of high grade irAEs and prompt intervention is essential. Despite the poor prognosis of these overlap syndromes, current recommendations offer little guidance for severe cases and warrant a call for increased awareness and expansion of available therapeutics.

The Novel Platinum Analog Dicycloplatin Provides Reliable Growth Inhibition of Urothelial Carcinoma Cells In Vitro.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Platinum-based chemotherapies are a component of standard-of-care regimens for urothelial carcinoma (UC). These nephrotoxic drugs are often dose-limiting, with cisplatin and carboplatin being the most commonly used. Dicycloplatin (DCP) has better solubility and stability, with comparable efficacy and better tolerability. Some suggest the use of DCP as primary treatment for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. We exposed UC cell lines to DCP in vitro to assess its efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A high grade (IV) in vitro UC cell line (TCCSUP) was exposed to varying concentrations of cisplatin (0-600 µg/ml), carboplatin (0-600 µg/ml), oxaliplatin (0-4.0 µg/ml), and DCP (0-350 µg/ml). Grade II-IV cells were exposed to varying concentrations of DCP (0-350 µg/ml) to assess time- and concentration-dependent growth inhibition, and simulate intravesical treatment. Growth inhibition was determined following 24, 48, and 72 h of exposure, using a tetrazolium dye to assess mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity. RESULTS: DCP, cisplatin, and carboplatin effectively achieved >90% cell kill at 72 h. Concentrations of 325 µg/ml DCP, 50 µg/ml cisplatin, and 600 µg/ml carboplatin were sufficient for >90% cell-kill, with cisplatin demonstrating the highest efficacy at the lowest concentration/time intervals. Dose- and time-dependent cell kill were demonstrated at varying concentrations of DCP in grade II-IV cell lines, including cells exposed intravesically. CONCLUSION: In vitro, DCP demonstrates cell-killing efficacy in a time- and concentration-dependent manner in grade II-IV UC cell lines, showing promise for its intravenous, oral, and intravesical use for bladder UC in both primary and adjuvant/neoadjuvant settings.

Enfortumab Vedotin for Elderly Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Patients or Those With a Poor Performance Status.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The efficacy, safety, and liver toxicity of enfortumab vedotin (EV) for elderly advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) patients and patients with a poor performance status (PS) are unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy, safety, and liver toxicity of EV in elderly patients and patients with a poor PS between December 2021 and August 2023. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients (≥75 years old, n=22; PS≥2, n=10) were enrolled. Patients with PS≥2 had significantly lower albumin levels than those with PS<2 (p=0.023). The objective response and disease control rates did not differ significantly between patients <75 and ≥75 years old (p=0.598 and p=0.769, respectively) or between those with PS<2 and PS≥2 (p>0.99 and p=0.178, respectively). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not significantly different in patients <75 years and ≥75 years (p=0984, 0.368). A significant difference in PFS (p=0.047) but not OS (p=0.086) was observed between the PS<2 and PS≥2 groups. The rates of any-grade and severe (grade ≥3) adverse events did not differ significantly between patients <75 and ≥75 years (p=0.471, p=0.136) or between PS<2 and PS≥2 groups (p>0.99, 0.99). Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels significantly increased, but alanine aminotransferase levels did not, following EV treatment (p<0.001). Multivariate analyses revealed that the albumin level was an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio=0.159; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: EV demonstrated similar efficacy and safety in elderly and younger patients with advanced UC. In patients with a poor PS, although the safety was similar, survival was significantly worse in terms of PFS, while the AST levels were significantly elevated.

Clinical Outcomes of Enfortumab Vedotin in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma With Prior Avelumab Versus Pembrolizumab Therapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study retrospectively evaluated whether enfortumab vedotin (EV) monotherapy is effective as a late-line treatment according to prior treatment type in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed consecutive patients from the Uro-Oncology Group in the Kyushu study population with lower and upper urinary tract cancer treated with EV monotherapy after platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy failure between December 2021 and March 2024. In particular, patients receiving avelumab maintenance or pembrolizumab therapy before EV for advanced UC were analyzed and compared according to the response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of the 80 enrolled patients, 31 and 49 received avelumab and pembrolizumab before EV therapy, respectively. The avelumab and pembrolizumab groups had comparable objective response rates (48.4% vs. 44.9%, p=0.820) and disease control rates (77.4% vs. 67.3%, p=0.448). These two groups showed no significant difference in PFS from the initiation of EV (median: 6.4 months vs. 4.2 months, p=0.184); meanwhile, the avelumab group had better OS from the initiation of EV than the pembrolizumab group (median: 16.0 months vs. 10.2 months, p=0.019). Moreover, the median OS after first-line chemotherapy initiation was longer in the avelumab group than in the pembrolizumab group (40.3 months vs. 24.7 months, p=0.054). On multivariate analysis, avelumab maintenance therapy before EV reduced the mortality risk by 47% (95% confidence interval=0.27-1.03; p=0.059). CONCLUSION: EV monotherapy after avelumab maintenance therapy provides favorable survival outcomes in patients with advanced UC.

Cutaneous and Renal Toxicities of Enfortumab Vedotin for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: The UROKYU Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The clinical outcomes associated with cutaneous toxicity and changes in the renal function of patients receiving enfortumab vedotin (EV) for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) is unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the relationship between clinical outcomes and EV-related cutaneous toxicity, and the influence on the renal function in 58 patients with advanced UC who received EV after the failure of platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors from December 2021 to July 2023. RESULTS: There were no differences in the overall response and disease control rates between patients with any grade of EV-related cutaneous toxicity and without (p=0.605 and p>0.99, respectively) nor of grade ≥3 (p>0.99 and p=0.173, respectively). Progression-free survival was not significantly associated with EV-related cutaneous toxicity of any grade (5.4 vs. 5.6 months, p=0.557) nor of grade ≥3 (2.7 vs. 5.6 months, p=0.053). Overall survival was not significantly associated with EV-related cutaneous toxicity of any grade (11.8 vs. 8.9 months, p=0.389), nor of grade ≥3 (4.6 vs. 11.4 months, p=0.168). The incidence of EV-related cutaneous toxicity of any grade was significantly higher in patients with any grade of ICI-related cutaneous toxicity (88.9% vs. 36.7%, p=0.008). There was no significant difference in the serum creatinine levels after EV treatment (p=0.211). Divided into two groups according to their renal function, using a serum creatinine cut-off of 2 mg/dl, there were no significant changes after EV treatment in either group (p=0.187 and p=0.938). CONCLUSION: EV-related cutaneous toxicity did not affect clinical outcomes, although it occurred in patients who experienced immune checkpoint inhibitor-related cutaneous toxicity. EV did not affect renal function.

Avelumab first-line maintenance in advanced urothelial carcinoma: Complete screening for prognostic and predictive factors using machine learning in the JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Avelumab first-line (1 L) maintenance is a standard of care for advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) based on the JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase 3 trial, which showed that avelumab 1 L maintenance + best supportive care (BSC) significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) vs BSC alone in patients who were progression free after receiving 1 L platinum-containing chemotherapy. Here, we comprehensively screened JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial datasets to identify prognostic factors that define subpopulations of patients with longer or shorter OS irrespective of treatment, and predictive factors that select patients who could obtain a greater OS benefit from avelumab 1 L maintenance treatment. METHODS: We performed machine learning analyses to screen a large set of baseline covariates, including patient demographics, disease characteristics, laboratory values, molecular biomarkers, and patient-reported outcomes. Covariates were identified from previously reported analyses and established prognostic and predictive markers. Variables selected from random survival forest models were processed further in univariate Cox models with treatment interaction and visually inspected using correlation analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves. Results were summarized in a multivariable Cox model. RESULTS: Prognostic baseline covariates associated with OS included in the final model were assignment to avelumab 1 L maintenance treatment, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, site of metastasis, sum of longest target lesion diameters, levels of C-reactive protein and alkaline phosphatase in blood, lymphocyte proportion in intratumoral stroma, tumor mutational burden, and tumor CD8+ T-cell infiltration. Potential predictive factors included site of metastasis, tumor mutation burden, and tumor CD8+ T-cell infiltration. An analysis in patients with PD-L1+ tumors had similar findings to those in the overall population. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning analyses of data from the JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial identified potential prognostic and predictive factors for avelumab 1 L maintenance treatment in patients with aUC, which warrant further evaluation in other clinical datasets.

Enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab combination as a relevant game changer in urothelial carcinoma: What is left behind?

The EV-302 study1 marks a pivotal leap in the management of advanced urothelial carcinoma, setting a new benchmark for frontline therapy. Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab is the first combination therapy that has ever outperformed standard chemotherapy. The degree of benefit and the reported safety profile should make this combination a first-choice option for most patients with advanced-stage urothelial carcinoma.

Frontline immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients ≥ 90 years with advanced urothelial cancer: a single center experience.

INTRODUCTION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved for advanced urothelial cancer alone and as first-line in combination with enfortumab vedotin. Platinum based chemotherapy which is another frontline choice is often not a treatment option for older patients due to comorbidities that increase with age. Despite ICIs being better tolerated compared to traditional chemotherapy little is known about their efficacy and toxicity in patients ≥ 90 years due to the rarity of this population in clinical trials. Our objective was to analyze the efficacy and toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients ≥ 90 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a single center retrospective review of patients ≥ 90 years treated between July 2019 and September 2023 with standard of care ICIs for advanced urothelial cancer. RESULTS: Six patients treated with pembrolizumab were identified. Four (66.7%) were male and mean age was 93.5 years at the time of treatment initiation. Response rate was 66.7% (4 patients) with 3 complete responses, which were durable off therapy. Median follow up was 18.2 months. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 10.2 months [95%confidence interval (95%CI): 1.77, not reached (NR)] and median overall survival (OS) was 18.2 months (95%CI: 12.1, NR). Side effects presented in 4 (66.7%) patients and included hypothyroidism, diarrhea, anemia, thrombocytopenia, rash, and bullous dermatitis. One patient developed grade 3 anemia and no patients experienced grade 4 events or required hospitalization due to treatment side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience in a small cohort of patients ≥ 90 years indicate that ICIs are well tolerated and effective for the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma in this patient population.

C-reactive Protein Is a Prognostic Factor for Survival in Metastatic Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Patients Receiving Pembrolizumab.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The number of available treatment options for urothelial carcinoma has increased recently. Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is relatively rare compared with bladder cancer. There are few reports on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for metastatic UTUC, and ICIs may occasionally show less efficacy and cause severe side effects. Therefore, it is important to predict the treatment response and change the treatment strategy as appropriate. We investigated the prognostic factors for treatment response in patients with metastatic UTUC treated with pembrolizumab at our hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who received pembrolizumab for UTUC between January 2018 and June 2023 were analyzed. Patients who presented with bladder cancer complications at initial diagnosis were excluded. The primary endpoints assessed were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Statistical analyses were conducted using laboratory values obtained before and after pembrolizumab administration. The relationship between cancer and inflammation is important. Therefore, we analyzed this relationship using prognostic factors for urothelial carcinoma as previously reported. Specifically, pretreatment C-reactive protein (CRP) level, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and NLR/albumin values were examined. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were analyzed. The median PFS was 66 days (24-107 days), and the median OS was 164 days (13-314 days). A CRP level <1 before the first cycle was a useful factor in the multivariate analysis for both OS and PFS [OS: p=0.004, hazard ratio (HR)=3.244, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.464-7.104; PFS: p=0.003, HR=2.998, 95%CI=1.444-6.225]. CONCLUSION: CRP level is a prognostic factor for pembrolizumab treatment response in patients with UTUC.

Optimal Number of Cycles of First-line Platinum-based Chemotherapy for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: In recent years, switch maintenance after platinum-based chemotherapy has been a standard of care. However, the appropriate number of systemic chemotherapy cycles against advanced-stage urothelial carcinoma (UC) remains unclear. This study assessed the survival outcomes of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy according to treatment cycles in patients with metastatic disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients with metastatic bladder and upper urinary tract cancer who received platinum-based combination therapy. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. RESULTS: Of 179 patients, 47 (26.3%) were women, and 73 (40.8%) had upper urinary tract cancer. Furthermore, 47 (26.3%) who were not eligible for cisplatin received carboplatin. The median number of treatment cycles was 3 (range=1-14 cycles). The rates of progressive disease within two cycles, from two to four cycles, and from four to six cycles were 18.4%, 19.2%, and 30.6%, respectively. The median OS of patients with 2, 3, 4, 5-6, and ≥7 treatment cycles were 8.6, 14.3, 21.3, 24.4, and 26.1 months, respectively. The OS did not significantly differ between patients receiving four treatment cycles and those receiving ≥5 treatment cycles. In patients with disease control (complete or partial response or stable disease) receiving ≥4 treatment cycles, there was no significant difference in terms of OS between patients receiving four cycles and those receiving six cycles. CONCLUSION: Four cycles of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy can be effective in patients with metastatic UC.

Marked Response to Nivolumab by a Patient With SMARCA4-Deficient Undifferentiated Urothelial Carcinoma Showing High PD-L1 Expression: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: SMARCA4 is a component gene of the SWI/SNF (SWItch/Sucrose NonFermentable) chromatin remodeling complex; undifferentiated tumors associated with its functional deletion have been described in several organs. However, no established treatment for these tumors currently exists. CASE: In this study, we report a case of a SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated urothelial carcinoma with high PD-L1 expression that was effectively treated with nivolumab after early relapse following treatment for non-invasive bladder cancer. The histological morphology of the rhabdoid-like undifferentiated tumor of unknown primary led us to suspect a SWI/SNF-deficient tumor, and subsequent immunostaining led to the diagnosis of a SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumor. This effort also led to the identification of the developmental origin of this SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumor as a non-invasive bladder cancer. We also carried out a detailed immune phenotypic assay on peripheral T cells. In brief, a phenotypic change of CD8+T cells from naive to terminally differentiated effector memory cells was observed. CONCLUSION: Regardless of the organ of cancer origin or cancer type, SWI/SNF-deficient tumors should be suspected in undifferentiated and dedifferentiated tumors, and immune checkpoint inhibitors may be considered as a promising treatment option for this type of tumor. The pathogenesis of SMARCA4-deficient anaplastic tumors awaits further elucidation for therapeutic development.

Is HER2 the New NECTIN4 in Advanced Urothelial Cancer?

Antibody-drug conjugates have transformed treatment for urothelial cancer (UC). Enfortumab vedotin is the new standard of care in the first-line setting for advanced UC. A personalised approach targeting HER2 in UC is currently being explored.