ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cleft lip and palate are congenital craniofacial anomalies that significantly impact individuals and their families, both medically and psychosocially. The Qatari population has unique characteristics that are suggestive of a high prevalence of congenital anomalies: high consanguinity rate, large family size, advanced paternal age and high prevalence of certain genetic disorders. The lack of existing data concerning the epidemiology of cleft lip and/or palate in Qatar warrants a descriptive study addressing this topic. METHODS: A retrospective nationwide hospital-based cross-sectional study conducted to determine the prevalence of orofacial clefts in Qatar from 2016 to 2021. Data were extracted from the corporation's Cerner database and electronic health records. Information concerning the cleft's characteristics, type, affected side, patient's gender, presence of associated syndromes, nationality, and maternal age were collected. RESULTS: Out of the 147,727 live births, 148 had an orofacial cleft. The prevalence of cleft lip and/or palate was determined to be 1 per 1000 livebirths (95% CI: 0.85, 1.18). The prevalence of cleft lip was 0.18 (95% CI: 0.12, 0.27), cleft palate 0.39 (95% CI: 0.30, 0.51), and cleft lip and palate 0.43 (95% CI: 0.33, 0.55). Qataris had a prevalence of CL 0.25, CP 0.40, and CLP 0.56, compared to 0.16, 0.39, 0.39 for non-Qataris (p-value 0.186). Unilateral clefts predominated over bilateral (74.4% and 25.6%, respectively). Among the unilateral cases, 70.2% occurred on the left side. Most cases were isolated clefts, with only 10.2% having associated syndromes. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of orofacial clefts in Qatar is consistent with the globally reported prevalence. Most cases were unilateral and on the left side. Associated syndromes were infrequent and more common with cleft palate alone. Intriguing patterns were revealed between Qatari nationals and non-Qatari residents, with specific subtypes of orofacial clefts showing higher prevalence among nationals.
Subject(s)
Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Humans , Qatar/epidemiology , Cleft Lip/epidemiology , Cleft Palate/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Prevalence , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Infant, Newborn , AdultSubject(s)
Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Latin America/epidemiology , Humans , Caribbean Region/epidemiology , Cleft Lip/epidemiology , Prevalence , Cleft Palate/epidemiology , Time Factors , Female , MaleABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pattern of dental anomalies encountered in cleft patients shows subtle signs of genetic involvement. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and pattern of tooth agenesis and supernumerary teeth in Thai cleft population according to the cleft type. METHODS: Data collected from patients with cleft lip and palate, who had been treated at Tawanchai Cleft Center, Khon Kaen University, Thailand, available during year 2012-2022, were investigated. Records from 194 patients with non-syndromic clefts met the inclusion criteria. Standard dental records, and at least either orthopantomogram (OPG) or cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), were examined. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square and binominal test (p ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: Prevalence of tooth agenesis was higher (77.3%) than that of supernumerary teeth (5.7%) and was more common in bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) (88.1%) than in unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) (72.6%) (p = 0.017). The upper lateral incisor was more frequently affected (46.4%), followed by the upper second premolar. The number of missing teeth observed on the left side was significantly higher. Patients with left UCLP (ULCLP) had the highest prevalence of tooth agenesis. A total of 41 tooth agenesis code (TAC) patterns was found. The prevalence of supernumerary teeth was comparable with 6.6% of ULCLP, 5.1% of BCLP, and 4.5% of URCLP. Tooth-number anomalies were observed more often in the BCLP and were most likely to occur on the left side of the maxilla. Both types of anomalies could be featured in a small proportion of cleft patients. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of the patients with non-syndromic cleft lip and palate in this study, presented with tooth-number anomalies. Tooth agenesis was approximately 10-time more prevalent than supernumerary teeth. Tooth agenesis was likely to appear on the left-side of the maxilla regardless of the laterality of the cleft.
Subject(s)
Anodontia , Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Tooth, Supernumerary , Humans , Cleft Lip/epidemiology , Cleft Palate/epidemiology , Tooth, Supernumerary/epidemiology , Tooth, Supernumerary/diagnostic imaging , Thailand/epidemiology , Prevalence , Male , Female , Anodontia/epidemiology , Anodontia/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Child , Radiography, Panoramic , Young Adult , Southeast Asian PeopleABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Orofacial clefts (OFCs) are among the most common birth defects (BD). In 2008, a series of improvements began in the Costa Rican Birth Defect Register Center (CREC). We aim to explore trends between 1996 and 2021. METHODS: A trend analysis of OFCs from 1996 to 2021 and a descriptive analysis of OFCs from 2010 to 2021 were performed based on data from the CREC, the national BD surveillance system. Prevalence at birth was calculated according to the type: cleft palate (CP), cleft lip with or without CP (CL ± P), and presentation (isolated, multiple non-syndromic, or syndromes). We used joinpoint regression to identify if a significant change in trend occurred; the average annual percent change (AAPC) was determined. Marginal means and prevalence ratios by subperiod (1996-2009 as referent and 2010-2021) were estimated using Poisson regression and compared using Wald's chi-square tests (α ≤.05). RESULTS: We found a significant AAPC for OFCs prevalence of +1.4: +0.6 for isolated, +2.9 for multiple non-syndromic, and +7.7 for syndromes (p < .05). When comparing the OFC's prevalence of the subperiod 2010-2021 (11.86 per 10,000) with 1996-2009 (9.36 per 10,000) the prevalence ratio was 1.3 (p < .01): 1.1 (p < .05) for isolated, 1.6 (p < .01) for multiple non-syndromic, and 3.3 (p < .01) for syndromes. The prevalence of OFCs from 2010 to 2021 was 9.1 for CL ± P and 2.8 for CP. Seventy-one percent of the OFCs were isolated, 22% multiple non-syndromic, and 7% syndromes. CONCLUSION: The trend in OFCs' prevalence is toward increasing, mainly due to improvements in the surveillance system.
Subject(s)
Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Costa Rica/epidemiology , Humans , Cleft Lip/epidemiology , Cleft Palate/epidemiology , Prevalence , Female , Male , Registries , Infant, Newborn , Population Surveillance/methodsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To use the bibliographic data of publications regarding the association between orofacial cleft (OC) and cancer to examine the implications of publication growth, co-citation, co-words, and authorship networks using bibliometric indicators and network visualization. METHODS: Bibliometric study analyzed documents related to the association between OC and cancer. Data were obtained in October 2023 from the Scopus, Pubmed, Web of Science. The search strategy was developed, and data obtained were imported into R ("bibliometrix") for analysis. Results: 70 documents were found from 1977 to 2023. Most were journal articles (90.0%) designed as case-control studies (42.8%). American Journal of Epidemiology was the most relevant source. The most cited document was Frebourg T, et al. (2006). Vieira A, Martelli-Junior were the most cited author. Most authors were affiliated to Brazil (University of Montes Claros) and United States (University of Pittsburgh). Research in this thematic has included children and adults of both sexes. Research trend points to gastric cancer, leukemia and breast cancer as the most investigated cancers in association to OC. CONCLUSION: This bibliometric analysis helps fill research gaps regarding the knowledge of the relationship between OC and cancer, providing some clues for selecting future research in this topic.
Analysis of publications regarding the association between orofacial cleft and cancer highlighted: The majority of publications as journal articles (90.0%) designed as casecontrol studies (42.8%).American Journal of Epidemiology was the most relevant source.The most global cited documents were Frebourg T, et al. (2006).Vieira A, Martelli-Junior was the top author of the published literature and the most local cited author.Most of the authors were mainly affiliated to Universities from Brazil (University of Montes Claros) and United States (University of Pittsburgh).Motor themes of study include genetic association studies, investigating single nucleotides polymorphisms shared by OC and cancer types.Research in this thematic has included children and adults of both sexes. Research trend points to gastric cancer, leukemia and breast cancer as the most investigated cancers in association to OC.
Subject(s)
Bibliometrics , Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Neoplasms , Humans , Cleft Lip/epidemiology , Cleft Palate/epidemiology , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Biomedical Research/trendsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) affects 1 in 700 live births globally. Children born with CL/P and their families face various challenges throughout the child's development. Extant research is often limited by small numbers and single-centre data. The Cleft Collective, a national cohort study in the UK, aims to build a resource, available to collaborators across the globe, to understand causes, best treatments and long-term outcomes for those born with CL/P, ultimately seeking to enhance their quality of life through improved understanding and care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A longitudinal prospective cohort study of children born with CL/P and their families. Recruitment occurs across the UK and started in November 2013. Recruitment will continue until September 2027 with an estimated final sample of 4822 children born with CL/P (1157 cleft lip including/excluding the alveolus; 2112 cleft palate only; 1042 unilateral cleft lip and palate and 511 bilateral cleft lip and palate). Biological samples are collected from all recruited members of the family. Parental and child questionnaires are collected at key time points throughout the child's development. Surgical data are collected at the time of surgical repair of the child's cleft. Consent is obtained to link to external data sources. Nested substudies can be hosted within the cohort. Regular engagement with participants takes place through birthday cards for the children, social media posts and newsletters. Patient and Public Involvement is conducted through the Cleft Lip And Palate Association and Cleft Collective Patient Consultation Group who provide insightful and essential guidance to the Cleft Collective throughout planning and conducting research. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Cleft Collective was ethically approved by the National Research Ethics Service committee South West-Central Bristol (REC13/SW/0064). Parental informed consent is required for participation. Findings from the Cleft Collective are disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, newsletters and social media.
Subject(s)
Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Humans , Cleft Lip/surgery , Cleft Lip/epidemiology , Cleft Palate/surgery , Cleft Palate/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Longitudinal Studies , United Kingdom , Child , Infant , Quality of Life , Child, Preschool , Female , Male , Research Design , Surveys and Questionnaires , Parents/psychologyABSTRACT
The work presents the connection between the infection of COVID-19 during pregnancy and non-syndromic orofacial clefts (NSOFC). Aim of the study was to compare the incidence of COVID-19 disease during mother´s pregnancy between a group of the children with NSOFC and a control group of the children without NSOFC. COVID-19 was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test. The study showed significantly higher incidence of COVID-19 disease in the group of mothers who gave birth to a child with NSOFC in comparison to the group of mothers who gave birth to a child without NSOFC. Our results indicate the possible participation of the infection of COVID-19 in the formation of NSOFCs.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Humans , Cleft Lip/epidemiology , Cleft Palate/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology , Incidence , Adult , Male , Infant, NewbornABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have also associated cleft palate with increased cholesteatoma risk. Despite this close relation, the incidence of cholesteatoma and associated otologic issues in patients with ectodermal dysplasia types highly associated with cleft palate (EDT-ACPs) has not been formally analyzed. This study provides insight to guide clinicians caring for patients with ED types associated with cleft palate. METHODS: Individuals with TP63 disorders and Goltz syndrome/Focal Dermal Hypoplasia in the National Foundation for Ectodermal Dysplasia database were contacted for participation in an online REDCap survey from Sept-Dec '22. Descriptive statistics were generated using SAS JMP Pro 17 statistical software. RESULTS: 65 individuals participated in the survey (response rate approx. 18 %). The median [IQR] age was 22 [14, 43], 41 (63 %) were female, and Ectrodactyly-Ectodermal Dysplasia-Cleft Lip/Palate Syndrome (EEC) was most common (n = 26, 40 %). We found that, among our respondents with a history of cleft palate, the incidence of cholesteatoma was 39 %. Among respondents without a history of cleft palate, the incidence of cholesteatoma was 13 % CONCLUSIONS: Otologic issues, such as cholesteatoma, can have permanent implications including hearing loss that can be minimized by early identification and treatment. The estimated incidence of cholesteatoma among our participants is far above the estimated incidence of cholesteatoma in the general population with and without a history of cleft palate, suggesting an independent contribution of EDT-ACPs to the risk of cholesteatoma.
Subject(s)
Cleft Palate , Ectodermal Dysplasia , Humans , Ectodermal Dysplasia/complications , Ectodermal Dysplasia/epidemiology , Female , Male , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adolescent , Adult , Cleft Palate/epidemiology , Cleft Palate/complications , Young Adult , Incidence , Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To verify the prevalence and perform the clinical characterization of oral clefts in a sample of patients with trisomy of chromosome 18 in Southern Brazil. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study, performed in a reference clinical genetic service in Southern Brazil. The initial sample consisted of 77 patients diagnosed in the neonatal period with trisomy 18 treated at the Clinical Genetics Service of a referral hospital at Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre (UFCSPA). The patients' diagnosis was confirmed by karyotype and care was provided during their stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) of the hospital that is a reference in Southern Brazil for care for malformed patients. The period covered was from 1975 to 2020. RESULTS: During the study period, 77 patients diagnosed with trisomy 18 were treated, most of them in the ICU. Of these, 13 individuals were excluded due to incomplete data. The final sample consisted of 64 patients with an average age of 2.4 years of life, ranging from one day to 16 years old, the majority of whom were female. Regarding face dysmorphisms identified in the sample, three (4,68%) patients had cleft lip and two (3,11%) had cleft lip and palate. CONCLUSIONS: This study contributed to the recognition of the characteristics and prevalence of oral clefts in individuals with trisomy 18 in a sample of patients from Southern Brazil. In addition, we described the clinical alterations found in patients with oral clefts, as well as other associated comorbidities, such as cardiac, neurological and pulmonary comorbidities, as well as cranial and facial dysmorphisms.
Subject(s)
Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Trisomy 18 Syndrome , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Retrospective Studies , Male , Trisomy 18 Syndrome/epidemiology , Trisomy 18 Syndrome/diagnosis , Trisomy 18 Syndrome/genetics , Prevalence , Adolescent , Infant, Newborn , Brazil/epidemiology , Child , Infant , Child, Preschool , Cleft Palate/epidemiology , Cleft Palate/genetics , Cleft Lip/epidemiology , Cleft Lip/geneticsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Children's of Mississippi at the University of Mississippi Medical Center serves as the state's only American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association-approved cleft team at the only pediatric hospital in the state. The goal of this study is to report geographic and demographic patterns of patients with orofacial cleft (OFC) treated at Children's of Mississippi, which are lacking. METHODS: Patients with OFC treated at Children's of Mississippi from 2015 to 2020 were included. Demographic data were collected, including birth county and total live births from state data. Significant differences between incidence of OFC among public health regions of Mississippi were examined using analysis of variance (P < 0.05). Cases were compared with historical data from 1980 to 1989. RESULTS: There were 184 patients who presented with OFC, with a statewide incidence of 0.83 per 1000 live births among 222,819 live births in the state across 6 years. The incidence of OFC was 0.83/1000 for Whites and 0.82/1000 for non-Whites versus a historical rate of 1.36 and 0.54, respectively. Significantly fewer children in the northern region (0.25/1000) were born with OFC than in central (1.21; P < 0.001) and southern (0.86; P < 0.001) regions. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study suggest changing regional patterns of OFC in Mississippi. Although rates increased among non-White infants, the overall incidence of OFC has decreased compared with historical data. The findings may reflect actual incidence patterns in the state or the proximity of certain regions to Children's of Mississippi. Further study may reveal regional differences in risk factors underlying OFC incidence, and/or issues with access to cleft care for different regions in the state.
Subject(s)
Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Humans , Cleft Palate/epidemiology , Cleft Lip/epidemiology , Mississippi/epidemiology , Incidence , Female , Male , Follow-Up Studies , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Orofacial clefts (OFC) are the most common congenital malformation of the craniofacial skeleton. Attempts have been made to correlate the components of maternal diet as triggers for the development or prevention of OFC. OBJECTIVE: To analyze nutritional status as a predictive factor for the development of cleft lip and palate in an Amazonian population. METHODS: A total of 152 mothers within 3 months of delivery were interviewed for comparison: 51 mothers of children with nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate (CLP) (study group) and 101 mothers of children without OFC (control group). A food frequency questionnaire was used to assess maternal nutrition and to analyze the influence of macro- and micronutrients on the possible predisposition or protection for CLP. RESULTS: The study group showed higher percentage of lipid intake than did the control group (p = 0.01). Among the participants with no family history of OFC, the study group had a higher percentage of lipid intake (p = 0.002) and lower vegetable intake (p = 0.037). Maternal micronutrient intake among the participants with a positive family history was lower in the study group for vitamins B2 (p = 0.03), B5 (p = 0.036), E (p = 0.03), and folate (p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Nutritional analysis indicated that higher maternal lipid intake increased the likelihood of having offsprings with nonsyndromic CLP. Moreover, families with a history of OFC and low maternal folate intake showed heightened risk of nonsyndromic CLP in their offsprings.
Subject(s)
Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Nutritional Status , Humans , Cleft Palate/epidemiology , Cleft Palate/etiology , Cleft Lip/epidemiology , Cleft Lip/etiology , Female , Case-Control Studies , Risk Factors , Adult , Brazil/epidemiology , Male , Diet/adverse effects , Diet/statistics & numerical data , PregnancyABSTRACT
An embryopathy with the disappointment of the nasal cycles as well as a combination of the palatal racks causes orofacial cleft (OFC). Perhaps the most pervasive distortion among live births is this extreme birth condition. The two kinds of human clefts are cleft of the lip with or without a palate (CL±P) and cleft palate only (CPO). They are both hereditary in origin, although ecological impacts play a part in the advancement of these innate irregularities. The capacity of prescriptions at the beginning of cleft lip is analyzed in this overview. The data came from epidemiological investigation, (ii) laboratory animal trials, and (iii) genetic investigation in humans. These investigations have tracked down a connection between prescriptions of corticosteroids and antiepileptics taken during gestation and an improved probability of having OFC-positive children, however, no connection between anti-inflammatory medicine and OFC has been found.
Subject(s)
Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Humans , Cleft Lip/chemically induced , Cleft Lip/epidemiology , Cleft Palate/chemically induced , Cleft Palate/epidemiology , Animals , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Female , Pregnancy , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/adverse effects , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Objective: To examine the characteristics of the prevalence of congenital cleft lip with/without cleft palate in the ethnic Tibetan population and to provide support for the precise prevention and treatment of cleft lip with/without cleft palate in the Tibetan population. Methods: The clinical data of Tibetan patients with cleft lip with/without cleft palate were collected and the clinical characteristics of the patients were analyzed. The patients' age ranged from 2 months to 51 years old. All the subjects were admitted to West China Stomatology Hospital, Sichuan University for the treatment of cleft lip with/without cleft palate between January 2016 and August 2023. Most of the subjects came from Sichuan Province and the Tibet Autonomous Region. Results: A total of 1051 patients were enrolled and children aged under 12 months (460 cases) accounted for the largest proportion. Among the subjects, 383 had cleft lip only (36.44%), 140 had cleft palate only (13.32%), and 528 had cleft lip with cleft palate (50.24%). The male-to-female ratios of patients with cleft lip only (0.99â¶1), cleft palate only (0.54â¶1), and cleft lip with cleft palate (1.67â¶1) exhibited significant differences (P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the male-to-female ratio in patients with cleft lip only or those with cleft lip with cleft palate when the subjects were divided into two groups according to whether they had unilateral or bilateral cleft lip with/without cleft palate. Most of the patients with bilateral cleft lip were female, while most of the patients with unilateral cleft lip and unilateral or bilateral cleft lip with cleft palate were male. The unilateral cleft lip with/without cleft palate was located predominantly on the left side. Syndromic cleft lip with/without cleft palate accounted for 3.43% of all the cases and the most common concomitant deformity was congenital heart disease. 3.81% (40 cases) of the patients had a family history. In the patients with cleft lip only and those with cleft palate only, the proportion of patients having parents with corresponding phenotypes was higher than those of other phenotypes of cleft lip with/without cleft palate. Regarding the birth time distribution of the children with cleft lip with/without cleft palate, Spring saw the highest number of births of these children (311 cases, 29.59%), while Winter saw the lowest number of births (231 cases, 21.98%). Conclusion: The cases of cleft lip with/without cleft palate in the ethnic Tibetan population are predominantly cleft lip and palate. Unilateral cleft lip only or cleft lip with palate is predominantly located on the left side. Lip disease phenotypes may be more heritable.
Subject(s)
Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Cleft Lip/epidemiology , Cleft Lip/complications , Cleft Palate/epidemiology , Ethnicity , Prevalence , Tibet/epidemiologyABSTRACT
The aim was to establish a specific and definite connection between non-syndromic orofacial cleft patients and associated congenital heart disease (CHD). Following PRISMA guidelines, selective databases were searched for data collection. Studies showing a definite association of CHD with orofacial cleft were included, and studies non-specific of the association of orofacial cleft with CHD were excluded. Data extraction criteria were study design, frequency of CHD in overall non-syndromic orofacial cleft and in specific cleft type, and most prevalent congenital cardiac anomaly. DerSimonian Laird random effects model was used to estimate the pooled proportion of CHD, along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each measure. Publication bias was assessed using Fail-Safe N analysis and the Rosenthel approach. Of a total of 182 articles searched, only 30 studies were assessed. The overall pooled estimate of the proportion of CHD in total cleft lips/palates was 16% (95% CI: 13-19). The odds of developing CHD in cleft palates was 4.08 times more as compared to cleft lips with 95% CIs of 3.86-4.33, and 1.65 more as compared to cleft lips and palates both with 95% CI of 1.52-1.68. We affirm the upsurging prevalence of CHD in non-syndromic cleft children and vehemently propose that it is of utmost importance to inculcate it in practice and policy-making to screen all non-syndromic orofacial cleft children for congenital cardiac anomaly. This study was registered on PROSPERO (ID no. CRD42023391597) on February 24, 2023.
Subject(s)
Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Heart Defects, Congenital , Humans , Cleft Lip/epidemiology , Cleft Lip/diagnosis , Cleft Lip/complications , Cleft Palate/epidemiology , Cleft Palate/diagnosis , Cleft Palate/complications , Heart Defects, Congenital/epidemiology , Heart Defects, Congenital/diagnosis , PrevalenceABSTRACT
Cleft lip and palate deformities substantially burden individuals and families, particularly in low-income communities. However, a comprehensive understanding of the patterns and distribution of these deformities in Kenya remains limited. This retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed 647 clinical records from the BelaRisu Foundation registry in Kenya, spanning 2018-2022. After meticulous record verification and data extraction, cleft pattern modeling was used to analyze each case. Data were imported to SPSS version 29.0 and descriptive statistics were calculated, which included means, ranges, frequencies, percentages, and standard deviations. Additionally, a comparative analysis between genders was conducted. The findings revealed a higher average age of presentation compared with previous studies in Kenya, along with a greater susceptibility of males to cleft lip and palate defects overall. Noteworthy disparities in case distribution across provinces were observed. Cleft lip emerged as the most observed primary defect, while palatal fistulae constituted the most frequent secondary defect. Interestingly, while some results aligned with global trends, others diverged significantly from the existing literature, warranting further exploration and investigation. These findings shed light on the unique patterns and distribution of cleft lip and palate deformities in Kenya, highlighting the need for targeted interventions and support systems.
Subject(s)
Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Humans , Cleft Lip/epidemiology , Cleft Lip/diagnosis , Cleft Palate/epidemiology , Cleft Palate/diagnosis , Kenya/epidemiology , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Infant , Adolescent , Registries , Infant, NewbornABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The study aimed to investigate the association between maternal cocaine abuse during pregnancy and the prevalence of cleft lip/palate (CL/P) in offspring, synthesizing existing evidence through a systematic review and meta-analysis. CL/P is a congenital craniofacial anomaly with complex etiology, and prior research has suggested potential links between maternal cocaine use and CL/P. However, these associations remain inconclusive. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies published up to the study's cutoff date in September 2021. Several databases were systematically searched using predefined search terms. Inclusion criteria were set to encompass studies reporting on the prevalence of CL/P in infants born to mothers with a history of cocaine use during pregnancy, with a comparison group of non-cocaine-using mothers. Data were extracted, and a meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR) and relative risks (RR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: The review included data from 4 studies that met the inclusion criteria. The combined OR from two studies was 0.05 (95% CI: 0.00, 4.41), which does not suggest a statistically significant association between prenatal cocaine exposure and the incidence of CL/P due to the confidence interval crossing the null value. Additionally, the combined RR was 0.17 (95% CI: 0.04, 0.66), indicating a statistically significant decrease in the risk of CL/P associated with prenatal cocaine exposure. These results, with an OR that is not statistically significant and an RR suggesting decreased risk, should be interpreted with caution due to considerable heterogeneity and variability among the included studies' findings. Further research is needed to clarify these associations. CONCLUSION: The findings from this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that maternal cocaine use during pregnancy is not a statistically significant independent risk factor for the development of CL/P in offspring. These results underscore the multifactorial nature of CL/P etiology and emphasize the importance of considering other genetic, environmental, and nutritional factors in understanding the condition's origins. While the study provides important insights, limitations such as data heterogeneity and potential confounders should be acknowledged. Future research should adopt rigorous study designs and explore a broader range of potential risk factors to comprehensively elucidate CL/P development.
Subject(s)
Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Cocaine-Related Disorders , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects , Humans , Cleft Lip/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Cleft Palate/epidemiology , Cleft Palate/chemically induced , Cocaine-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Cocaine-Related Disorders/complications , Female , Incidence , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiologyABSTRACT
The frequency of cleft lip with/without palate (CL/P) in the Mongolian population is approximately 1 in 1314 live births. This research aims to disseminate information about this congenital disability to the public to better understand CL/P, and people's fissures, and review administrative measures, as there is a lack of research in this area. A questionnaire survey was conducted using Google Forms, with 1000 Mongolian participants. Most participants (86.7%) said they had knowledge of the word, whereas 86.2% said they had knowledge of the condition. Most participants' answers were question-related disadvantages of CL/P patients, including statements such as "It's uncomfortable in human relationships" and "It makes an uncomfortable impression on the person you meet the first time." The results of this study revealed that most Mongolians were aware of CL/P and are concerned about patients. However, the causes of CL/P in the general population remain unknown, and further research is needed in this area.
Subject(s)
Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Female , Humans , Cleft Lip/diagnosis , Cleft Lip/epidemiology , Cleft Palate/diagnosis , Cleft Palate/epidemiology , Mongolia/epidemiology , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUNDS: Cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL/P) is the most common congenital craniofacial anomaly, including non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate and cleft palate only. Failure in the fusion of median and lateral nasal processes, the maxillary prominence, and soft tissues around the oral cavity can cause CL/P. Previously, the prevalence has been estimated to be 1 among every 1000 births in 2014 among American neonates and no other reports have been available since. Thus, this study aimed to calculate the prevalence and trend of isolated CL/P among American live births from 2016 to 2021 with its associated risk factors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this cross-sectional population-based retrospective study, we used live birth data provided by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). We calculated the prevalence per 10,000 live births of isolated (non-syndromic) CL/P from 2016 to 2021. To examine risk factors for developing isolated CL/P, we used logistic regression modelling. RESULTS: The total prevalence per 10,000 births from 2016 to 2021 was 4.88 (4.79-4.97), for both sexes, and 5.96 (5.82-6.10) for males, and 3.75 (3.64-3.87) for females. The prevalence did not show any consistent linear decreasing or increasing pattern. We found significant association between increased odds of developing isolated CL/P among cases with 20 to 24 year-old mothers (OR = 1.07, 1.01-1.13, p = 0.013), mothers who smoked 11 to 20 cigarettes per day (OR = 1.46, 1.33-1.60, p < 0.001), mothers with extreme obesity (OR = 1.32, 1.21-1.43, p < 0.001), mothers with grade II obesity (OR = 1.32, 1.23-1.42, p < 0.001), mothers with pre-pregnancy hypertension (OR = 1.17, 1.04-1.31, p = 0.009), mothers with pre-pregnancy diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.96, 1.71-2.25, p < 0.001), and mothers who used assisted reproductive technology (OR = 1.40, 1.18-1.66, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest a minuscule increase, albeit insignificant, in the trend of CL/P prevalence from 2016 to 2021. Developing CL/P had greater odds among mothers with pre-pregnancy diabetes, smoking, obesity, and pre-pregnancy hypertension mothers along with mothers who used assisted reproductive technology. Isolated CL/P had the highest prevalence in non-Hispanic Whites, American Indian or Alaskan Native and Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islanders.
Subject(s)
Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Hypertension , Female , Male , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Humans , Young Adult , Adult , Cleft Palate/epidemiology , Cleft Lip/epidemiology , Live Birth/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , ObesityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Orofacial clefts (OFCs) include cleft palate (CP), cleft lip (CL), and cleft lip with cleft palate (CLP) and require multidisciplinary healthcare services. Alberta, Canada has a publicly funded, universal access healthcare system. This study determined publicly funded healthcare costs for children with an OFC and compared these costs to children without congenital anomalies. METHODS: This retrospective population-based cohort analysis used the Alberta Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System to identify children born between 2002 and 2018 with an isolated OFC. They were matched 1:1 to a reference cohort based on sex and year of birth. The study population included 1614 children, from birth to 17 years of age linked to administrative databases to estimate annual inpatient and outpatient costs. Average annual all-cause costs were compared using two-sample independent t tests. RESULTS: The mean total cleft-related costs per patient were highest for children with CLP ($74,138 CAD, standard deviation (SD) $43,447 CAD), followed by CP ($53,062 CAD, SD $74,366 CAD), and CL ($35,288 CAD, SD $49,720 CAD). The mean total all-cause costs per child were statistically significantly higher (p < .001) in children with an OFC ($56,305 CAD, SD $57,744 CAD) compared to children without a congenital anomaly ($18,600 CAD, SD $61,300 CAD). CONCLUSIONS: Despite public health strategies to mitigate risk factors, the trend for OFCs has remained stable in Alberta, Canada for over 20 years. The costs reported are useful to other jurisdictions for comparison, and to families, healthcare professionals, service planners, and policy makers.