Trial to assess the tolerability of using felodipine to upregulate autophagy as a treatment of Huntington's disease (FELL-HD): a phase II, single-centre, open-label, dose-finding trial protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Huntington's disease (HD) is an autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disorder that presents with a progressive movement disorder along with cognitive and psychiatric problems. It is caused by a Cytosine-adenin-guanine (CAG) expansion in exon 1 of the huntingtin gene which codes for mutant huntingtin (mHTT) that over time accumulates in cells, causing dysfunction and then death through new toxic gain-of-function mechanisms. Autophagy has been shown to be critical for the degradation of diverse intracytoplasmic aggregate-prone proteins that cause neurodegenerative disease, including mHTT. From a screen of a library enriched in approved drugs, felodipine was selected as the most suitable candidate showing strong autophagy-inducing effects in preclinical models of HD. We are, therefore, conducting a trial to assess the safety and tolerability of felodipine in people with early HD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: FELL-HD is a phase II, single-centre, open-label, dose-finding trial in people with early HD. 18 participants with early clinical features of the disease will be treated with felodipine for 58 weeks, with a further 4-week follow-up. The primary outcome measure is the number of adverse events attributable to felodipine. Exploratory outcomes include additional measures of motor and cognitive function, non-motor symptoms and quality of life scales, as well as peripheral and central disease biomarkers assessed through brain MRI. Analysis of blood and cerebrospinal fluid will also be performed through an associated sample study, FELL HD-s. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the London-Brent Research Ethics Committee (reference 22/LO/0387) and has been accepted by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency for clinical trials authorisation (reference CTA 12854/0256/001-0001). A lay summary of the results of the trial will be uploaded to our research group website which is publicly accessible. A webinar or in-person open day, to present results of the trial to participants and our wider cohort of patients who attend our centre, will be held once the trial is completed. The results of the trial will also be published in scientific journals and presented at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: EudraCT-2021-000897-27, ISRCTN56240656.

A Research Protocol for a Phase II Single-Arm Clinical Trial Assessing the Feasibility and Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Anastrozole in Patients With Luminal Breast Cancer and Low Proliferative Index: The ANNE Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) is recommended for the treatment of invasive breast cancer (BC), particularly luminal subtypes, in locally advanced stages. Previous randomized studies have demonstrated the benefits of aromatase inhibitors in this context. However, NET is typically reserved for elderly or frail patients who may not tolerate neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Identifying non-responsive patients early and extending treatment for responsive ones would be ideal, yet optimal strategies are awaited. AIMS: This non-randomized phase 2 clinical trial aims to assess NET feasibility and efficacy in postmenopausal stage II and III luminal BC patients, identifying predictive therapeutic response biomarkers. Efficacy will be gauged by patients with Ki67 ≤ 10% after 4 weeks and Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index (PEPI) scores 0 post-surgery. Study feasibility will be determined by participation acceptance rate (recruitment rate ≥50%) and inclusion rate (>2 patients/month). METHODS: Postmenopausal women with luminal, HER2-tumors in stages II and III undergo neoadjuvant anastrozole treatment, evaluating continuing NET or receiving chemotherapy through early Ki67 analysis after 2 to 4 weeks. The study assesses NET extension for up to 10 months, using serial follow-ups with standardized breast ultrasound and clinical criteria-based NET suspension. Clinical and pathological responses will be measured overall and in the luminal tumor A subgroup. Toxicity, health-related quality of life, and circulating biomarkers predicting early NET response will also be evaluated.

Magnesium sulphate to prevent perioperative atrial fibrillation in cardiac surgery: a randomized clinical trial : A protocol description of the PeriOperative Magnesium Infusion to Prevent Atrial fibrillation Evaluated (POMPAE) trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common and potentially serious complication post cardiac surgery. Hypomagnesaemia is common after cardiac surgery and recent evidence indicates that supplementation of magnesium may prevent POAF. We aim to investigate the effectiveness of continuous intravenous magnesium sulphate administration in the perioperative period to prevent POAF as compared to placebo. METHODS: The (POMPAE) trial is a phase 2, single-center, double-blinded randomized superiority clinical study. It aims to assess the impact of perioperative continuous intravenous magnesium administration on the occurrence of cardiac surgery-related POAF. A total of 530 patients will be included. Eligible patients will be randomized in 1:1 ratio to the intervention or placebo group with stratification based on the presence of valvular surgery. The objective of the infusion is to maintain ionized magnesium levels between 1.5 and 2.0 mmol/L. DISCUSSION: The primary outcome measure is the incidence of de novo POAF within the first 7 days following surgery, with censoring at hospital discharge. This trial may generate crucial evidence for the prevention of POAF and reduce clinical adverse events in patients following cardiac surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The POMPAE trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under the following identifier NTC05669417, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05669417 . Registered on December 30, 2022. PROTOCOL VERSION: Version 3.3, dated 13-01-2023.

Bayesian sequential monitoring strategies for trials of digestive cancer therapeutics.

BACKGROUND: New therapeutics in oncology have presented challenges to existing paradigms and trial designs in all phases of drug development. As a motivating example, we considered an ongoing phase II trial planned to evaluate the combination of a MET inhibitor and an anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy to treat advanced oesogastric carcinoma. The objective of the paper was to exemplify the planning of an adaptive phase II trial with novel anti-cancer agents, including prolonged observation windows and joint sequential evaluation of efficacy and toxicity. METHODS: We considered various candidate designs and computed decision rules assuming correlations between efficacy and toxicity. Simulations were conducted to evaluate the operating characteristics of all designs. RESULTS: Design approaches allowing continuous accrual, such as the time-to-event Bayesian Optimal Phase II design (TOP), showed good operating characteristics while ensuring a reduced trial duration. All designs were sensitive to the specification of the correlation between efficacy and toxicity during planning, but TOP can take that correlation into account more easily. CONCLUSIONS: While specifying design working hypotheses requires caution, Bayesian approaches such as the TOP design had desirable operating characteristics and allowed incorporating concomittant information, such as toxicity data from concomitant observations in another relevant patient population (e.g., defined by mutational status).

A phase II, multicenter, nonblinded, randomized controlled trial for evaluating protective effects of ABPC/SBT plus, azithromycin versus erythromycin, in pregnant women with pPROM occurring at <28 weeks of gestation on the development of BPD in neonates: Study protocol.

This is a protocol for PPROM-AZM Study, phase II, nonblinded, randomized controlled trial. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at a postmenstrual age of 36 weeks (BPD36) is often observed in infants with preterm premature rupture of the membranes (pPROM). A regimen of ampicillin (ABPC) intravenous infusion for 2 days and subsequent amoxicillin (AMPC) oral administration for 5 days plus erythromycin (EM) intravenous infusion for 2 days followed by EM oral administration for 5 days is standard treatment for pPROM. However, the effect on the prevention of moderate/severe BPD36 using the standard treatment has not been confirmed. Recently, it is reported that ampicillin/sulbactam (ABPC/SBT) plus azithromycin (AZM) was effective for the prevention of moderate/severe BPD36 in pPROM patients with amniotic infection of Ureaplasma species. Therefore, our aim is to evaluate the occurrence rate of the composite outcome of "incidence rate of either moderate/severe BPD36 or intrauterine fetal death, and infantile death at or less than 36 weeks 0 days" comparing subjects to receive ABPC/SBT for 14 days plus AZM for 14 days (intervention group) and those to receive ABPC/SBT for 14 days plus EM for 14 days (control group), in a total of 100 subjects (women with pPROM occurring at 22-27 weeks of gestation) in Japan. The recruit of subjects was started on April 2022, and collection in on-going. We also investigate the association between the detection of Ureaplasma species and occurrence of BPD36. In addition, information on any adverse events for the mother and fetus and serious adverse events for infants are collected during the observation period. We allocate patients at a rate of 1:1 considering two stratification factors: onset of pPROM (22-23 or 24-27 weeks) and presence/absence of a hospital policy for early neonatal administration of caffeine. Trial registration: The trial number in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials is jRCTs031210631.

Immunity in digestive diseases: new drugs for inflammatory bowel disease treatment-insights from Phase II and III trials.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), continues to challenge treatment paradigms. Advancements in therapeutic options have been have been driven by Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials of new drug classes, particularly sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) modulators and interleukin-23 (IL-23) inhibitors. METHODS: This review synthesizes findings from Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials conducted up to early 2024, focusing on the impact of S1P modulators and IL-23 inhibitors on IBD management. Drugs such as ozanimod, etrasimod, risankizumab, mirikizumab, guselkumab, and brasikumab were evaluated for their efficacy and safety profiles. RESULTS: S1P modulators, such as ozanimod and etrasimod, effectively regulate immune cell trafficking to reduce inflammation and several trials highlight their clinical effectiveness in both inducing and maintaining remission in IBD, highlighting its long-term safety and sustained therapeutic effects. Additionally, IL-23 inhibitors including risankizumab, mirikizumab, and guselkumab, which disrupt key inflammatory cytokine pathways, have already shown significant effectiveness in inducing and maintaining remission in both CD and UC, with favorable safety profiles across multiple studies, suggesting their potential as critical components in managing IBD. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical trials indicate that both S1P modulators and IL-23 inhibitors offer promising therapeutic benefits and maintain strong safety profiles, positioning them as potential cornerstone treatments for IBD. Despite these advancements, further exploration into long-term safety and the development of personalized treatment strategies is essential for maximizing clinical outcomes.

From Plan to Pivot: How Model-Informed Drug Development Shaped the Dose Strategy of the Zibotentan/Dapagliflozin ZENITH Trials.

Getting the dose right is a key challenge in drug development; model-informed drug development (MIDD) provides powerful tools to shape dose strategies and inform decision making. In this tutorial, the case study of the ZENITH trials showcases how a set of clinical pharmacology and MIDD approaches informed an impactful dose strategy. The endothelin A receptor antagonist zibotentan, combined with the sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor dapagliflozin, has yielded a robust and significant albuminuria reduction in the Phase IIb trial ZENITH-CKD and is being investigated for reduction of kidney function decline in a high-risk chronic kidney disease population in the Phase III trial ZENITH High Proteinuria. Endothelin antagonist treatment has, until now, been limited by the class effect fluid retention. ZENITH-CKD investigated a wide range of zibotentan doses based on pharmacokinetics in renal impairment, competitor-data exposure-response modeling, and clinical trial simulations. Recruitment delays reduced interim analysis data availability; here, supportive dose-response modeling recovered decision-making confidence. At trial completion, the low-dose arm enabled Phase III dose selection between Phase IIb doses. Dose-response modeling of efficacy and Kaplan-Meier analyses of tolerability identified a kidney-function-based low-dose strategy of 0.25 or 0.75 mg zibotentan (with 10 mg dapagliflozin) to balance benefit/risk in ZENITH High Proteinuria. The applied clinical pharmacology and MIDD principles enabled successful Phase IIb dose finding, rationalized and built confidence in the innovative Phase III dosing strategy and identified a potential therapeutic window for zibotentan/dapagliflozin, providing the opportunity for a significant improvement in the treatment of chronic kidney disease with high proteinuria.

Rationale and methodology for examining the combination of aerobic exercise and cognitive rehabilitation on new learning and memory in persons with multiple sclerosis and mobility disability: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: This paper describes the protocol for a Phase I/II, parallel-group, single-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT). The RCT investigates the combined effects of 12-weeks of aerobic exercise training (AET) integrated with virtual reality (VR) and cognitive rehabilitation (CR) on new learning and memory in 78 persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) who have mobility disability and objective impairments in learning and memory. METHODS: Participants will undergo baseline assessments consisting of neuropsychological testing, neuroimaging, self-report questionnaires, and cardiorespiratory fitness. Participants will then be randomized into one of two conditions using concealed allocation: aerobic cycling exercise that incorporates VR combined with CR or stretching and toning (i.e., active control; S/T) combined with CR. Participants will be masked regarding the intent of the conditions. After 7-weeks of exercise alone, the 5-week Kessler Foundation modified Story Memory Technique (KF-mSMT®) will be integrated into the training. After the 12-week training period, participants will complete the same measures as at baseline administered by treatment-blinded assessors. Primary study outcomes include new learning and memory (NLM) measured by a small battery of neuropsychological assessments that assess list learning (California Verbal Learning Test-II), prose memory (Memory Assessment Scale), visuospatial memory (Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised), and everyday memory (Ecological Memory Simulations). Secondary study outcomes include neuroimaging outcomes of hippocampal structure, function, and connectivity. CONCLUSION: If successful, this trial will provide the first Class I evidence supporting the unique combination of aerobic cycling exercise with VR and CR for treating MS-related learning and memory impairments in persons with mobility disability.

Study protocol for a randomised, phase II, double-blind, experimental medicine study of obinutuzumab versus rituximab in ANCA-associated vasculitis: ObiVas.

INTRODUCTION: Relapses in ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) increase the incidence of end-organ damage and their prevention requires prolonged immunosuppressive therapy. Rituximab, a type I anti-CD20 B cell depleting monoclonal antibody, is the current standard of care for induction of disease remission. Rituximab is not always effective and is associated with a high subsequent relapse risk. Obinutuzumab is a type II anti-CD20 humanised monoclonal antibody with the potential to obtain greater tissue B cell depletion than rituximab and reduce relapse risk in AAV. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: ObiVas is a randomised, phase II, double-blind controlled trial that will compare the mechanistic effects of rituximab and obinutuzumab in the induction treatment of patients with AAV positive for proteinase 3 ANCA (PR3-ANCA). 26 patients, either newly diagnosed or relapsing, will be recruited from a single centre and randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1000 mg rituximab or obinutuzumab as induction therapy on days 1 and 15, alongside a tapering glucocorticoid regimen. The primary end point is CD19+ B cell depletion in nasal-associated lymphoid tissue (NALT), assessed as change from baseline to week 26. Secondary outcomes will compare the safety and clinical efficacy of rituximab and obinutuzumab and their impact on immune biomarkers, including tissue and peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets and PR3-ANCA binding levels. Patients are followed through to week 78. The trial opened for recruitment in January 2023 and is forecasted to complete recruitment by the end of 2024. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: For all patients, informed written consent will be obtained in keeping with Good Clinical Practice. Trial results will be disseminated to the relevant scientific, clinical and patient communities on trial closure. NALT data analysis will start before trial completion. Other analyses will be reported after trial completion. This trial was given ethical approval by Edgbaston (West Midlands) Research Ethics Committee (approval reference 22/WM/0174). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN13069630.

Serplulimab combined with gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel and stereotactic body radiotherapy as the first-line treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma in China: a multicentre, single-arm, phase II trial (ICSBR) protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remain a poor prognosis despite the development of chemotherapy. Although programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) blockade has shown great efficacy in various solid tumours, its application in treating PDAC is limited. Recent studies have indicated that chemotherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may improve the antitumour effect of PD-1 blockade in patients with PDAC. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined therapy comprising PD-1 blockade, gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy and SBRT for patients with metastatic PDAC. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, single-arm, prospective phase II clinical trial. Forty-three patients diagnosed with metastatic PDAC will be enrolled. The eligible patients will be intravenously administered 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine and 125 mg/m2 nab-paclitaxel on days 1 and 8 of the 21-day cycle. Serplulimab (200 mg) will be administered intravenously on day 1 of the 21-day cycle. Furthermore, during the second cycle, the patients will undergo SBRT with doses of 33 Gy in five fractions for primary lesions or doses of 24 Gy in three fractions for metastases. The primary endpoint is the 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate. The secondary endpoints overall survival, PFS, overall response rate, disease control rate, time to progression, duration of response, duration of disease control and safety. Moreover, this trial seeks to investigate biomarkers such as circulating tumour DNA and circulating hybrid cells in patients diagnosed with metastatic PDAC. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee on Biomedical Research, West China Hospital of Sichuan University. The study results will be presented at international conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2300073237.

Designing a single-arm phase 2 clinical trial of mitapivat for adult patients with erythrocyte membranopathies (SATISFY): a framework for interventional trials in rare anaemias - pilot study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Membranopathies encompass haemolytic disorders arising from genetic variants in erythrocyte membrane proteins, including hereditary spherocytosis and stomatocytosis. Congenital dyserythropoietic anaemia type II (CDA II) is associated with the SEC23B gene and can exhibit phenotypic similarities to membranopathies. Current treatment options for these conditions, apart from splenectomy, are primarily supportive. Mitapivat, a novel pyruvate kinase (PK) activator, has demonstrated efficacy in increasing haemoglobin levels and reducing haemolysis in patients with PK deficiency, thalassemia, sickle cell disease and a mouse model of hereditary spherocytosis. METHODS AND ANALYSES: Safety and efficacy of mitapivat sulfate in adult patients with erythrocyte membranopathies (SATISFY) is a prospective, multicentre, single-arm phase two trial involving approximately 25 adult patients (≥18 years) diagnosed with a membranopathy or CDA II. During the 8-week dose escalation period, subjects will receive an initial dose of 50 mg mitapivat two times per day and may increase to 100 mg two times per day at week 4 based on the safety and changes in haemoglobin levels. Patients tolerating mitapivat well may be eligible to continue in two consecutive 24-week fixed dose periods.The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of mitapivat, assessed through the occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events. Secondary objectives include assessing the effects of mitapivat on haemoglobin levels, haemolysis, erythropoiesis, patient-reported outcome measures and spleen size.SATISFY aims to assess the safety and efficacy of mitapivat in adult patients with red blood cell membranopathies and CDA II, with the aim of establishing proof-of-concept in patients living with these rare conditions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: NCT05935202/CTIS:2023-503271-24-01. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05935202. CTIS:2023-503271-24-01. Registered 07-July-2023. Protocol number: 2.1. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05935202.

Developing targeted therapeutics for hepatocellular carcinoma: a critical assessment of promising phase II agents.

INTRODUCTION: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer worldwide and the first for primary liver tumors. In recent years greater therapeutic advancement was represented by employment of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) either in monotherapy or in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). AREAS COVERED: Major attention was given to target therapies in the last couple of years, especially in those currently under phase II trials. Priority was given either to combinations of novel ICI and TKIs or those targeting alternative mutations of major carcinogenic pathways. EXPERT OPINION: As TKIs are playing a more crucial role in HCC therapeutic strategies, it is fundamental to further expand molecular testing and monitoring of acquired resistances. Despite the recent advancement in both laboratory and clinical studies, further research is necessary to face the discrepancy in clinical practice.

Precision cancer medicine platform trials: Concepts and design of AcSé-ESMART.

Precision cancer medicine brought the promise of improving outcomes for patients with cancer. High-throughput molecular profiling of tumors at treatment failure aims to direct a patient to a treatment matched to the tumor profile. In this way, improved outcome has been achieved in a small number of patients whose tumors exhibit unique targetable oncogenic drivers. Most cancers, however, contain multiple genetic alterations belonging to and of various hallmarks of cancer; for most of these alterations, there is limited knowledge on the level of evidence, their hierarchical roles in oncogenicity, and utility as biomarkers for response to targeted treatment(s). We developed a proof-of-concept trial that explores new treatment strategies in a molecularly-enriched tumor-agnostic, pediatric population. The evaluation of novel agents, including first-in-child molecules, alone or in combination, is guided by the available understanding of or hypotheses for the mechanisms of action of the diverse cancer events. Main objectives are: to determine 1) recommended phase 2 doses, 2) activity signals to provide the basis for disease specific development, and 3) to define new predictive biomarkers. Here we outline concepts, rationales and designs applied in the European AcSé-ESMART trial and highlight the feasibility but also complexity and challenges of such innovative platform trials.

Assessing the net financial benefits of employing digital endpoints in clinical trials.

In the last few decades, developers of new drugs, biologics, and devices have increasingly leveraged digital health technologies (DHTs) to assess clinical trial digital endpoints. To our knowledge, a comprehensive assessment of the financial net benefits of digital endpoints in clinical trials has not been conducted. We obtained data from the Digital Medicine Society (DiMe) Library of Digital Endpoints and the US clinical trials registry, ClinicalTrials.gov. The benefit metrics are changes in trial phase duration and enrollment associated with the use of digital endpoints. The cost metric was obtained from an industry survey of the costs of including digital endpoints in clinical trials. We developed an expected net present value (eNPV) model of the cash flows for new drug development and commercialization to assess financial value. The value measure is the increment in eNPV that occurs when digital endpoints are employed. We also calculated a return on investment (ROI) as the ratio of the estimated increment in eNPV to the mean digital endpoint implementation cost. For phase II trials, the increase in eNPV varied from $2.2 million to $3.3 million, with ROIs between 32% and 48% per indication. The net benefits were substantially higher for phase III trials, with the increase in eNPV varying from $27 million to $40 million, with ROIs that were four to six times the investment. The use of digital endpoints in clinical trials can provide substantial extra value to sponsors developing new drugs, with high ROIs.

Radiation therapy and IRreversible electroporation for intermediate risk prostate cancer (RTIRE).

INTRODUCTION: Radiation Therapy and IRreversible Electroporation for Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer (RTIRE) is a phase II clinical trial testing combination of radiation therapy and irreversible electroporation for intermediate risk prostate cancer BACKGROUND: PCa is the most common non-cutaneous cancer in men and the second leading cause of cancer death in men. PCa treatment is associated with long term side effects including urinary, sexual, and bowel dysfunction. Management of PCa is based on risk stratification to prevent its overtreatment and associated treatment-related toxicity. There is increasing interest in novel treatment strategies, such as focal therapy, to minimize treatment associated morbidity. Focal therapy alone has yet to be included in mainstream guidelines, given ongoing concerns with potentially higher risk of recurrence. We hypothesize combining focal therapy with whole gland, reduced dose radiotherapy will provide acceptable oncologic efficacy with minimal treatment associated morbidity. RTIRE is a phase II single institution, investigator-initiated study combining a local ablative technique though local irreversible electroporation (IRE) with MR guided RT (MRgRT) to treat the entire prostate. The goal is to provide excellent oncologic outcomes and minimize treatment related side effects through leveraging benefits of locally ablative therapy with established radiation treatment techniques. METHODS: A total of 42 men with intermediate risk PCa per NCCN guidelines and focal grade group (GG) 2 or 3, Gleason Score (GS) 3 + 4 or GS 4 + 3, cancer in an MRI target will be enrolled. Patients with MRI visible foci of GG2/GG3 will undergo focal therapy with IRE of this lesion. Following successful focal therapy, patients will then undergo a course of reduced dose, whole gland MRgRT with either 32.5 Gy in 5 Fractions or 22 Gy in 2 fractions. The primary objective of the study is to determine safety. Secondary outcomes include evaluation of oncologic efficacy (as measured by the proportion of patients free of clinically significant cancer as defined as > Grade Group 1 at 1-year follow-up biopsy), imaging characteristics of patients pre and post RTIRE, impact on quality of life (QoL), and PSA kinetics. DISCUSSION: Combining IRE with a reduced dose radiotherapy may offer a new treatment paradigm for PCa by both reducing treatment effects of full dose radiotherapy and minimizing the risk of recurrence observed with focal therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05345444. Date of registration: April 25, 2022. PROTOCOL VERSION: 6.0, July 7, 2023.

Efficacy of Traditional Chinese Medicine Combined Online Group Psychotherapy (TCM-eRhab) on improving quality of life and relieving psychological burden for colorectal cancer survivors: a study protocol for a phase-II randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: More than 50% of colorectal cancer(CRC) patients experience cancer-related psychological burden after radical surgery, which can seriously affect their physical wellness, quality of life and even survival outcomes. Our research team developed a six-week Traditional Chinese Medicine Combined Online Group Psychotherapy (TCM-eRhab) and proved its efficacy on relieving cancer-related anxiety, depression and fear of cancer recurrence though phase I single arm clinical trial (n = 40). Large sample size randomized controlled clinical trial(RCT) is necessary to further evaluate TCM-eRhab's role on improving quality of life and survival outcomes among this population. METHODS: We design a phase II RCT study, in which 210 CRC patients who have received radical surgery (stage I-III) will be recruited. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to TCM-eRhab group or usual care group by 2:1 ratio. Patients in the intervention group will receive the structured TCM-eRhab program for six weeks, while patients in control group will receive usual care only. The primary outcomes are quality of life, severity of anxiety, depression and fear of cancer recurrence. Cancer recurrence rate will also be calculated according to long term follow-up data. DISCUSSION: As one of the first RCTs to evaluate the impacts of TCM combined psychological therapy to improve CRC patients' quality of life after surgery, the results from this study will provide innovative knowledge and evidence on integrating TCM into CRC survivorship care and mind-body intervention model.