Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
2.
Prog Community Health Partnersh ; 12(1): 45-54, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29606692

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: One international and three local organizations developed the Santa Ana Women's Health Partnership (SAWHP) to address cervical cancer in Santa Ana Huista, Huehuetenango, Guatemala. This paper describes the structure, outcomes, and lessons learned from our community partnership and program. METHODS: The community partnership developed a singlevisit approach (SVA) program that guided medically underserved women through screening and treatment of cervical cancer. LESSONS LEARNED: The program promoted acceptability of SVA among rural women by engaging local female leaders and improving access to screening services. The program's approach focused on maximizing access and generated interest beyond the coverage area. Distrust among the community partners and weak financial management contributed to the program's cessation after 4 years. CONCLUSIONS: The SAWHP design may guide future implementation of cervical cancer screening programs to reach medically underserved women. Open, ongoing dialogue among leaders in each partner institution is paramount to success.


Subject(s)
Community-Based Participatory Research/organization & administration , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Rural Population , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Adult , Community-Based Participatory Research/economics , Community-Institutional Relations , Cooperative Behavior , Female , Guatemala , Health Promotion/economics , Humans , Inservice Training/organization & administration , Medically Underserved Area , Middle Aged , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Trust
3.
J Ambul Care Manage ; 37(3): 258-68, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24887527

ABSTRACT

This article examines the experience of a frontier-based community health center when it utilized the Tool for Health and Resilience in Vulnerable Environments (THRIVE) for assessing social determinants of health with a local health consortium. Community members (N = 357) rated safety, jobs, housing, and education among the top health issues. Community leaders integrated these health priorities in a countywide strategic planning process. This example of a frontier county in New Mexico demonstrates the critical role that community health centers play when engaging with local residents to assess community health needs for strategic planning and policy development.


Subject(s)
Community Health Centers/organization & administration , Community-Based Participatory Research/organization & administration , Healthy People Programs/organization & administration , Patient-Centered Care/organization & administration , Social Determinants of Health , Community-Based Participatory Research/economics , Community-Based Participatory Research/methods , Health Planning/economics , Health Planning/methods , Health Planning/organization & administration , Health Policy , Health Priorities , Healthy People Programs/economics , Healthy People Programs/methods , Humans , New Mexico , Organizational Case Studies , Patient-Centered Care/economics , Patient-Centered Care/standards
4.
Gerontologist ; 51 Suppl 1: S94-105, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21565824

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We describe the recruitment strategies and personnel and materials costs associated with two community-based research studies in a Mexican-origin population. We also highlight the role that academic-community partnerships played in the outreach and recruitment process for our studies. We reviewed study documents using case study methodology to categorize recruitment methods, examine community partnerships, and calculate study costs. RESULTS: We employed several recruitment methods to identify and solicit 154 female caregivers for participation in qualitative interviews and quantitative surveys. Recruitment approaches included using flyers and word of mouth, attending health fairs, and partnering with nonprofit community-based organizations (CBOs) to sponsor targeted recruitment events. Face-to-face contact with community residents and partnerships with CBOs were most effective in enrolling caregivers into the studies. Almost 70% of participants attended a recruitment event sponsored or supported by CBOs. The least effective recruitment strategy was the use of flyers, which resulted in only 7 completed interviews or questionnaires. Time and costs related to carrying out the research varied by study, where personal interviews cost more on a per-participant basis ($1,081) than the questionnaires ($298). However, almost the same amount of time was spent in the community for both studies. IMPLICATIONS: Partnerships with CBOs were critical for reaching the target enrollment for our studies. The relationship between the University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) Resource Center for Minority Aging Research/Center for Health Improvement for Minority Elderly and the Department of Aging provided the infrastructure for maintaining connections with academic-community partnerships. Nevertheless, building partnerships required time, effort, and resources for both researchers and local organizations.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/economics , Community Networks , Community-Based Participatory Research/economics , Mexican Americans/statistics & numerical data , Patient Selection , Poverty , Adult , Aged , California/epidemiology , Female , Health Status Disparities , Humans , Male , Surveys and Questionnaires/economics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL