[Assessing the Impact of in-Hospital Formulary Policies on the Prescription Patterns of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs)].

Prescribing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with off-label dosage and administration is discouraged due to concerns about their effectiveness and safety. Consequently, our hospital pharmacist established a formulary with physicians for oral anticoagulants. Our study aimed to assess the adherence to this formulary by investigating the rate of appropriate DOAC prescribing. We included patients who were newly prescribed or continued on DOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban) at our hospital. We calculated the percentage of patients prescribed the correct dosage and administration according to the package insert and compared this across three time periods: pre-intervention (period A; April-September 2019), post-intervention phase 1 (period B; August 2021-January 2022), and post-intervention phase 2 (period C; November 2022-April 2023). We also examined the number of inquiries and consultation requests made by hospital pharmacists regarding DOAC dosage and administration. A total of 782 patients were surveyed (191 in period A, 263 in period B, and 328 in period C). The appropriate prescribing rates for DOACs were 79.1% in period A, 84.4% in period B, and 86.6% in period C. The proportion of cases where hospital pharmacists questioned or consulted doctors about DOAC dosage and administration was 3.7% in period A, 6.1% in period B, and 10.1% in period C. These findings indicate that active intervention by hospital pharmacists using the formulary regarding oral anticoagulant formularies may promote appropriate DOAC use.

Thrombolysis After Dabigatran Reversal for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A National Registry-Based Study and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Limited data exist on the safety of IV thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) after dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab. We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of idarucizumab pretreatment in patients with AIS receiving IVT. METHODS: A national registry-based study evaluated the safety and efficacy of IVT in this specific subgroup. We also conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies and case series, aiming to document the pooled rates of (1) symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), (2) any intracranial hemorrhage, (3) 3-month mortality, and (4) the proportion of excellent (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] scores 0-1) and (5) good (mRS scores 0-2) functional outcome at 3 months among patients with AIS, who received IVT after dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab. Moreover, we sought to compare these outcomes between IVT-treated patients after dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab and IVT-treated patients without dabigatran pretreatment. RESULTS: Thirteen cohorts including our nation-wide registry-based cohort and 1 case series comprising 553 patients with AIS (mean age: 75 years; male sex: 65%; median baseline NIH Stroke Scale score: 11 points) receiving idarucizumab before IVT were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled rate of sICH after IVT after idarucizumab administration was 4% (95% CI 1-9; I2 = 26%), while the pooled rates of any intracranial hemorrhage and 3-month mortality were 10% (95% CI 5-16; I2 = 24%) and 18% (95% CI 10-27; I2 = 0%), respectively. The pooled rates of excellent and good functional outcomes at 3 months were 56% (95% CI 27-83; I2 = 69%) and 70% (95% CI 57-81; I2 = 40%), respectively. The risk of sICH (risk ratio [RR] 1.86; 95% CI 0.91-3.80; I2 = 0%), any intracranial hemorrhage (RR 1.76; 95% CI 0.99-3.11; I2 = 8%), and 3-month mortality (RR 1.50; 95% CI 0.91-2.48; I2 = 0%) did not differ between patients with AIS receiving IVT with and without idarucizumab. Moreover, idarucizumab administration was associated with higher likelihood of achieving a 3-month good functional outcome (RR 1.35; 95% CI 1.11-1.65; I2 = 27%). DISCUSSION: IVT for AIS after dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab seems to be safe and effective in observational studies with limited number of patients. Randomized-controlled clinical trials are warranted to provide robust evidence on the safety and efficacy of IVT in this specific AIS subgroup.

Antithrombotic prophylaxis following total knee arthroplasty: a level I Bayesian network meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major concern following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The optimal pharmacological prophylaxis remains, however, controversial. The present investigation compared several non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants commonly employed as VTE prophylaxis following TKA. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to compare apixaban, aspirin, dabigatran, edoxaban, enoxaparin, fondaparinux, and rivaroxaban. The outcomes of interest were to compare the rate of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and major and minor haemorrhages. METHODS: This study was conducted according to the PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-Analyses of Health Care Interventions. In March 2024, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were accessed with no time constraints. All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing two or more drugs for the prevention of VTE following TKA were considered for inclusion. RESULTS: Data from 29,678 patients were collected. Of them, 67% (19,884 of 29,678 patients) were women. The mean age of the patients was 66.8 ± 2.8 years, and the mean BMI was 29.2 ± 1.5 kg/m2. There was comparability in age, sex, and BMI at baseline. Apixaban 5 mg, dabigatran 220 mg, and rivaroxaban 10 mg were the most effective in reducing the rate of DVT. Apixaban 5 mg, enoxaparin 60 mg, and rivaroxaban 40 mg were the most effective in reducing the rate of PE. Apixaban 5 mg, rivaroxaban 10 mg, and apixaban 10 mg were associated with the lowest rate of major haemorrhages. Apixaban 5 mg and 20 mg, and dabigatran 220 mg were associated with the lowest rate of minor haemorrhages. CONCLUSION: Administration of apixaban 5 mg demonstrated the best balance between VTE prevention and haemorrhage control following TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, network meta-analysis of RCTs.

Perioperative Management of Patients Taking Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Review.

Importance: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), comprising apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and dabigatran, are commonly used medications to treat patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. Decisions about how to manage DOACs in patients undergoing a surgical or nonsurgical procedure are important to decrease the risks of bleeding and thromboembolism. Observations: For elective surgical or nonsurgical procedures, a standardized approach to perioperative DOAC management involves classifying the risk of procedure-related bleeding as minimal (eg, minor dental or skin procedures), low to moderate (eg, cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia repair), or high risk (eg, major cancer or joint replacement procedures). For patients undergoing minimal bleeding risk procedures, DOACs may be continued, or if there is concern about excessive bleeding, DOACs may be discontinued on the day of the procedure. Patients undergoing a low to moderate bleeding risk procedure should typically discontinue DOACs 1 day before the operation and restart DOACs 1 day after. Patients undergoing a high bleeding risk procedure should stop DOACs 2 days prior to the operation and restart DOACs 2 days after. With this perioperative DOAC management strategy, rates of thromboembolism (0.2%-0.4%) and major bleeding (1%-2%) are low and delays or cancellations of surgical and nonsurgical procedures are infrequent. Patients taking DOACs who need emergent (<6 hours after presentation) or urgent surgical procedures (6-24 hours after presentation) experience bleeding rates up to 23% and thromboembolism as high as 11%. Laboratory testing to measure preoperative DOAC levels may be useful to determine whether patients should receive a DOAC reversal agent (eg, prothrombin complex concentrates, idarucizumab, or andexanet-α) prior to an emergent or urgent procedure. Conclusions and Relevance: When patients who are taking a DOAC require an elective surgical or nonsurgical procedure, standardized management protocols can be applied that do not require testing DOAC levels or heparin bridging. When patients taking a DOAC require an emergent, urgent, or semiurgent surgical procedure, anticoagulant reversal agents may be appropriate when DOAC levels are elevated or not available.

Prognosis of Patients With Ischemic Stroke With Prior Anticoagulant Therapy: Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin.

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been the drug of choice for preventing ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation since 2014. In previous studies, the stroke risk while taking warfarin was 2 per 100 patient-years and 1.5% per year while taking DOACs. We hypothesized that even if ischemic stroke occurred during anticoagulation therapy with DOACs, the prognosis was likely to be better than that with warfarin. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from 2002 to 2019, sourced from a nationwide claims database, were used to identify atrial fibrillation patients using International Classification of Diseases codes. Patients who experienced an ischemic stroke during anticoagulation were categorized by the drugs used (warfarin, dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban). The primary outcome was mortality within 3 months and 1 year after the ischemic stroke. Among the 9578 patients with ischemic stroke during anticoagulation, 3343 received warfarin, and 6235 received DOACs (965 dabigatran, 2320 apixaban, 1702 rivaroxaban, 1248 edoxaban). The DOACs group demonstrated lower risks of 3-month (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.550, [95% CI, 0.473-0.639]; P<0.0001) and 1-year mortality (adjusted HR, 0.596 [95% CI, 0.536-0.663]; P<0.0001) than the warfarin group. Apixaban and edoxaban within the DOAC group exhibited particularly reduced 1-year mortality risk compared with other DOACs (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed that DOACs have a better prognosis than warfarin after ischemic stroke. The apixaban and edoxaban groups had a lower risk of death after ischemic stroke than the other DOAC groups.

Reversal of direct oral anticoagulants: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH.

The currently approved direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used in clinical practice. Although serious bleeding risks are lower with DOACs than with vitamin K antagonists, bleeding remains the most frequent side effect. Andexanet alfa and idarucizumab are the currently approved specific reversal agents for oral factor (F)Xa inhibitors and dabigatran, respectively. Our prior guidance document was published in 2016, but with more information available on the utility and increased use of these reversal agents and other bleeding management strategies, we have updated this International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis guidance document on DOAC reversal. In this narrative review, we compare the mechanism of action of specific and nonspecific reversal agents, review the clinical data supporting their use, and provide guidance on when reversal is indicated. In addition, we briefly discuss the reversal of oral FXIa inhibitors, a new class of DOACs currently under clinical development.

Performance of HAS-BLED and DOAC scores to predict major bleeding events in atrial fibrillation patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants: A report from a prospective European observational registry.

BACKGROUND: The DOAC score has been recently proposed for bleeding risk stratification of patients with atrial fibrillation treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of HAS-BLED and DOAC score in predicting major bleeding events in a contemporary cohort of European AF patients treated with DOAC. METHODS: We included patients derived from a prospective observational registry of European AF patients. HAS-BLED and DOAC scores were calculated as per the original schemes. Our primary endpoint was major bleeding events. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare the predictive ability of the scores. RESULTS: A total of 2834 AF patients (median age [IQR] 69 [62-77] years; 39.6 % female) treated with DOAC were included in the analysis. According to the HAS-BLED score, 577 patients (20.4 %) were categorized as very low risk of bleeding, as compared to 1276 (45.0 %) according to DOAC score. A total of 55 major bleeding events occurred with an overall incidence of 1.04 per 100 patient-years. Both scores showed only a modest ability for the prediction of bleeding events (HAS-BLED area under the curve [AUC], 0.65, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.55-0.70; DOAC score AUC 0.62, 95 % CI 0.59-0.71, p for difference = 0.332]. At calibration analysis, the DOAC score showed modest calibration, especially for patients at high risk, when compared to HAS-BLED. CONCLUSION: In a contemporary cohort of DOAC-treated AF patients, both HAS-BLED and DOAC scores only modestly predicted the occurrence of major bleeding events. Our results do not support the preferential use of DOAC score over HAS-BLED.

Comparison of warfarin, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran for effectiveness and safety in atrial fibrillation patients with different CHA2DS2-VASc scores: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective cohort study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of warfarin, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with different CHA2DS2-VASc scores in northern China. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed to evaluate anticoagulation in AF patients at the second affiliated hospital of Harbin Medical University from September 2018 to August 2019. Patients included in this study (n = 806) received warfarin (n = 300), or rivaroxaban (n = 203), or dabigatran (n = 303). Baseline characteristics and follow-up data including adherence, bleeding events and ischemic stroke (IS) events were collected. RESULTS: Patients receiving rivaroxaban (73.9%) or dabigatran (73.6%) showed better adherence than those receiving warfarin (56.7%). Compared with warfarin-treated patients, dabigatran-treated patients had lower incidence of bleeding events (10.9% vs 19.3%, χ2 = 8.385, P = 0.004) and rivaroxaban-treated patients had lower incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (7.4% vs 13.7%, χ2 = 4.822, P = 0.028). We classified patients into three groups based on CHA2DS2-VASc score (0-1, 2-3, ≥ 4). In dabigatran intervention, incidence of bleeding events was higher in patients with score 0-1 (20.0%) than those with score 2-3 (7.9%, χ2 = 5.772, P = 0.016) or score ≥ 4 (8.6%, χ2 = 4.682, P = 0.030). Patients with score 0-1 in warfarin or rivaroxaban therapy had a similar but not significant increase of bleeding compared with patients with score 2-3 or score ≥ 4, respectively. During the follow-up, 33 of 806 patients experienced IS and more than half (19, 57.6%) were patients with score ≥ 4. Comparing patients with score 0-1 and 2-3, the latter had an significant reduction of IS in patients prescribed warfarin and non-significant reduction in rivaroxaban and dabigatran therapy. CONCLUSION: Compared with warfarin therapy, patients with different CHA2DS2-VASc scores receiving either rivaroxaban or dabigatran were associated with higher persistence. AF patients with score ≥ 4 were more likely to experience IS events while hemorrhagic tendency preferred patients with low score 0-1.

Selection criteria for anticoagulants: survey of Japanese cardiologists based on their daily clinical practice: the Selection DOAC study.

BACKGROUND: In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been utilized as an alternative to warfarin, which is known to have several limitations. This study aimed to clarify the selection criteria for anticoagulants, considering both individual patient factors and the differences between various drugs. METHODS: This study conducted a web-based questionnaire from September 20, 2023 to October 3, 2023, among physicians who were members of a cardiology-specific website. RESULTS: In total, 172 respondents were enrolled in this study. Edoxaban was the most frequently selected anticoagulant (39.1%), followed by apixaban (32.7%) and rivaroxaban (16.8%). Logistic regression analysis revealed that increased concern for adherence enhanced the frequency of selecting edoxaban (odds ratio [OR] = 2.42; p = 0.047), with the opposite trend observed for dabigatran (OR = 0.404; p = 0.029). The selection of apixaban is related to whether the patient is able to maintain a regular lifestyle, including adherence to medication schedules (OR = 1.874; p = 0.031). Furthermore, detailing activities from a medical representative, especially regarding a new indication, were found to influence drug selection for rivaroxaban (OR = 2.422; p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: This study revealed that edoxaban is the most frequently selected anticoagulant. Although prescribing cardiologists select drugs based on background factors, adherence to medication and information from medical representatives were also crucial factors in the selection process.

Time-in-therapeutic-range defined warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: a Nationwide Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Little is known how individual time-in-therapeutic-range (TTR) impacts the effectiveness and safety of warfarin therapy compared to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of standard dose DOACs to warfarin in patients with AF, while categorizing warfarin treated patients into quartiles based on their individual TTR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a nationwide study including all patients with new-onset AF between 2011 and 2018 in Finland. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using Cox regression analysis with the inverse probability of treatment weighted method to assess the risks of ischaemic stroke (IS), intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) and mortality for users of apixaban (n = 12,426), dabigatran (n = 4545), rivaroxaban (n = 12,950) and warfarin (n = 43,548). RESULTS: The median TTR for warfarin users was 72%. Compared to the second best TTR quartile (reference), the risk of IS was higher in the two poorest TTR quartiles, and lower in the best TTR quartile and on rivaroxaban [2.35 (95% confidence interval, 1.85-2.85), 1.44 (1.18-1.75), 0.60 (0.47-0.77) and 0.72 (0.56-0.92)]. These differences were non-significant for apixaban and dabigatran. HR of ICH was 6.38 (4.88-8.35) and 1.87 (1.41-2.49) in the two poorest TTR groups, 1.44 (1.02-1.93) on rivaroxaban, and 0.58 (0.40-0.85) in the best TTR group compared to the reference group. Mortality was higher in the two poorest TTR groups and lowest in the best TTR group. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome was unsatisfactory in the two lowest TTR quartiles - in half of the patients treated with warfarin. The differences between the high TTR groups and standard dose DOACs were absent or modest.

Direct Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety Among Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin in Japanese Patients: Nationwide Cohort Study in Japan.

Direct oral anticoagulant drugs (DOACs) are available in addition to warfarin for the treatment of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Anticoagulants are useful for practical pharmacotherapy in Asian populations, but their responses are different from those in Caucasian populations. Therefore, we aimed to identify the most useful anticoagulant using a nationwide insurance claims database in Japan. We extracted information on patients with NVAF treated with DOACs or warfarin for the first time between September 2015 and February 2018 to conduct a retrospective observational cohort study using the claims database of Japan. We calculated hazard ratios (HR) of effectiveness and safety endpoints among DOACs or warfarin after adjusting for backgrounds by propensity scores (inverse probability weighting). Using negative control outcomes, we considered renal function as an unmeasured confounding factor. After adjusting for their backgrounds, patients treated with DOACs showed higher effectiveness endpoints (stroke or systemic embolism) than those treated with warfarin (HR; 0.72-0.81) and higher safety in terms of safety end points (clinically significant bleeding) (HR; 0.80-0.88). The net clinical benefit, which reflects the actual clinical usefulness, indicates the advantages of DOACs over warfarin (HR; 0.75-0.82). Dabigatran had lower usefulness than edoxaban and rivaroxaban in Japanese patients treated with NVAF, even after considering the unmeasured confounding factor of kidney function. Based on practical clinical data, edoxaban and rivaroxaban were the most useful anticoagulants in Japanese patients with NVAF.

Risk factors for postgastric endoscopic submucosal dissection bleeding in direct oral anticoagulant users.

OBJECTIVES: Bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric tumors in patients taking antithrombotic drugs, in particular direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), remains unresolved; therefore, we evaluated the risk factors for post-ESD bleeding and drug differences in patients taking DOACs. METHODS: We included 278 patients taking antithrombotic drugs who underwent gastric ESD between January 2017 and March 2022. Antithrombotic drugs were withdrawn following the 2017 guidelines (Appendix on anticoagulants including DOACs). To further clarify differences in antithrombotic agents' effects, the peri-cancerous mucosa in the resected specimen was pathologically evaluated according to the Updated Sydney System. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess the risk of post-ESD bleeding. RESULTS: The incidence of post-ESD bleeding in patients taking DOACs was 19.6% (10/51). Among patients taking antithrombotic drugs, DOACs were identified as a possible factor involved in post-ESD bleeding (odds ratio [OR] 4.92). Among patients taking DOACs, possible factors included resection length diameter ≥30 mm (OR 3.72), presence of neutrophil infiltration (OR 2.71), lesions occurring in the lower third of stomach (OR 2.34), and preoperative antiplatelet use (OR 2.22). Post-ESD bleeding by DOAC type was 25.0% of patients (4/16) receiving apixaban, in 20.0% (3/15) receiving edoxaban, in 21.4% (3/14) receiving rivaroxaban, and in none of those receiving dabigatran. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of DOACs was shown to be a possible factor involved in post-ESD bleeding, and risk factors for patients taking DOACs included neutrophil infiltration. The pharmacological differences in the effects of DOACs contributing to bleeding in gastric ulcers suggest comparatively less bleeding with dabigatran after ESD.

Effectiveness and safety in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients switching from warfarin to direct oral anticoagulants in US healthcare claims.

INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of real-world studies examining the risks of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding (MB) among non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients switching from warfarin to a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). This retrospective study was conducted to compare the stroke/SE and MB risks between patients switched from warfarin to apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban in real-world clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study used data from four United States commercial claims databases from January 1, 2012 to June 30, 2019. The study population included NVAF patients initially treated with warfarin and switched to apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban within 90 days of their warfarin prescription ending. Patients were matched 1:1 between the DOACs in each database using propensity scores and then pooled for the final analysis. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate the risk of stroke/SE and MB. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The final population consisted of 2,611 apixaban-dabigatran, 12,165 apixaban-rivaroxaban, and 2,672 dabigatran-rivaroxaban pairs. Apixaban vs. dabigatran was associated with a lower risk of stroke/SE (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39-0.96) and MB (HR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.50-0.91). Apixaban vs. rivaroxaban was associated with a similar risk of stroke/SE (HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.73-1.07) and a lower risk of MB (HR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.52-0.68). There was no significant difference in either risk between dabigatran and rivaroxaban. These results provide important insights into how the risks of stroke/SE and MB for NVAF patients vary when switching from warfarin to different DOACs.

Efficacy and safety of oral factor Xa inhibitors versus vitamin-K antagonists in the early phase after acute ischemic stroke or TIA in the real-world setting: The PRODAST study.

INTRODUCTION: Factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors are superior to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in terms of avoiding hemorrhagic complications. However, no robust data are available to date as to whether this also applies to the early phase after stroke. In this prospective registry study, we aimed to investigate whether anticoagulation with FXa inhibitors in the early phase after acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) is associated with a lower risk of major bleeding events compared with VKAs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Prospective Record of the Use of Dabigatran in Patients with Acute Stroke or TIA (PRODAST) study is a prospective, multicenter, observational, post-authorization safety study at 86 German stroke units between July 2015 and November 2020. Primary outcome was a major bleeding event during hospital stay. Secondary endpoints were recurrent strokes, recurrent ischemic strokes, TIA, systemic/pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, death and the composite endpoint of stroke, systemic embolism, life-threatening bleeding and death. RESULTS: In total, 10,039 patients have been recruited. 5,874 patients were treated with FXa inhibitors and 1,050 patients received VKAs and were eligible for this analysis. Overall, event rates were low. We observed 49 major bleeding complications during 33,297 treatment days with FXa-inhibitors (rate of 14.7 cases per 10,000 treatment days) and 16 cases during 7,714 treatment days with VKAs (rate of 20.7 events per 10,000 treatment days), translating into an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 0.70 (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.37-1.32) in favor of FXa inhibitors. Hazards for ischemic endpoints (63 vs 17 strokes, aHR: 0.96 (95% CI: 0.53-1.74), mortality (33 vs 6 deaths, aHR: 0.87 (95% CI: 0.33-2.34)) and the combined endpoint (154 vs 39 events, aHR: 0.99 (95% CI: 0.65-1.41) were not substantially different. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This large real-world study shows that FXa inhibitors appear to be similarly effective in terms of bleeding events and ischemic endpoints compared to VKAs in the early post-stroke phase of hospitalization. However, the results need to be interpreted with caution due to the low precision of the estimates.

Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulant/Vitamin K Antagonists: Do They Affect the Trabecular and Cortical Structure of the Mandible?

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the mandibular bone structure of patients using oral anticoagulants (OACs) vitamin K antagonist drugs (warfarin) and other OACs including direct oral anticoagulants [(DOACs) apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, edoxaban]. Analyses were based upon the fractal dimension (FD), the panoramic mandibular index (PMI) and the Klemetti index (KI), which is also known as the mandibular cortical index (MCI). METHODOLOGY: Ninety participants were divided into three groups: group 1: 30 systemically healthy individuals who had not used any anticoagulants before, group 2: 30 individuals using warfarin, and group 3: 30 individuals using DOACs. FD was used to analyze trabecular bone architecture in the condyle, angle, and two sites in the alveolar bone. PMI was used to evaluate the quantity of cortical bone and KI was used to evaluate the cortical bone quality. RESULTS: There was no difference between the groups regarding FD analysis and KI; however, a difference was found between groups 1, 2, and 3 in the PMI (P≤ 0.001). The PMI in group 1 was higher than in groups 2 and 3. CONCLUSION: Mandibular radiomorphometric indices can be used on panoramic radiographs to evaluate the quantity of mandibular cortical bone in patients using oral anticoagulants.

Risk factors for thrombosis and spontaneous echocardiographic contrast with sludge in atrial fibrillation patients treated with oral anticoagulants before electrical cardioversion.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of thrombosis (T) risk predictors and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) are important tools in appropriate qualification of patients for safe electrical cardioversion. AIMS: We aimed to investigate predictors of T and spontaneous echocardiographic contrast (SEC) with sludge in the left atrium (LA) and appendage (LAA) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients on oral anticoagulation. METHODS: The study included 300 patients with AF lasting >48 hours. Two hundred and nineteen patients were treated with oral anticoagulants (OACs) (study group, rivaroxaban: 104 [47.5%], apixaban: 52 [23.7%], dabigatran: 23 [11.5%], VKAs: 40 [18.3%]). Eighty-one consecutive patients with AF lasting >48 hours and not treated with OACs constituted the control group. Before electrical cardioversion, all patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography and TEE. RESULTS: TEE revealed T in the LAA in 4.7% of cases. The number of patients with T or SEC4+ with sludge in the OAC and control groups was similar, 5.9% vs. 1.2% and 16.4% vs. 16.0%, respectively. The risk of SEC4+/T in patients treated with OACs was lowest in those taking rivaroxaban (odds ratio [OR], 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-0.87; P = 0.027) and highest in those receiving VKAs (OR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.15-5.39; P = 0.018). Multivariable analysis showed independent prognostic factors for SEC 4+/T: female sex (OR, 3.800; 95% CI, 1.592-9.072; P = 0.003), left ventricular ejection fraction (OR, 0.932; 95% CI, 0.890-0.957; P <0.001), and minimum LAA flow velocity (LAAfly min) (OR, 0.895; 95% CI, 0.841-0.954; P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Female sex, transthoracic echocardiography, and TEE results should be taken into account in assessing the risk of T/SEC with sludge in LA/LAA patients with AF.

Efficacy and safety of dabigatran and rivaroxaban in atrial fibrillation patients with impaired liver function: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with impaired liver function (ILF) have not been sufficiently studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOACs for stroke prevention in patients with AF and ILF. METHOD: This study was based on data from 15 centers in China, including 4,982 AF patients. The patients were divided into 2 subgroups based on their liver function status: patients with normal liver function (NLF)(n = 4213) and patients with ILF (n = 769). Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the risk of total bleeding, major bleeding, thromboembolism, and all-cause deaths in AF patients with NLF and ILF after taking dabigatran or rivaroxaban, respectively. RESULTS: Among AF patients treated with dabigatran or rivaroxaban, patients with ILF were associated with significantly higher major bleeding, compared with NLF patients (aOR: 4.797; 95% CI: 2.224-10.256; P < 0.001). In patients with NLF, dabigatran (n = 2011) had considerably lower risk of total bleeding than rivaroxaban (n = 2202) (aOR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.002-1.513; P = 0.049). In patients with ILF, dabigatran (n = 321) significantly favored lower risks of major bleeding compared with rivaroxaban(n = 448) (aOR: 5.484; 95% CI: 1.508-35.269; P = 0.026). CONCLUSION: After using dabigatran or rivaroxaban, patients with ILF had remarkably increased risk of major bleeding compared with patients with NLF. In AF patients with NLF, dabigatran had the distinct strength of significantly reduced risk of total bleeding compared with rivaroxaban. In patients with AF and ILF, dabigatran use was associated with lower risk for major bleeding compared with rivaroxaban.

Effect of different oral anticoagulants on cognitive function in patients with atrial fibrillation: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is 1 of the most common types of arrhythmias. At present, the treatment for patients with AF mainly includes oral anticoagulants (OACs). Studies have shown that OACs are associated with cognitive decline in patients with atrial fibrillation; however, there is a lack of relevant evidence. This study used Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) to investigate the effects of different oral anticoagulants on cognitive decline in patients with AF. METHODS: We systematically searched for clinical studies on oral anticoagulants in patients with AF in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library as of July 3, 2023. Cochrane's randomized controlled trial bias risk assessment tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used to assess the bias risk of the included studies. The main outcome measure was decreased cognitive functioning. RESULTS: Ten studies were included, including 2 RCTs and 7 RCSs, including 882,847 patients with AF. Five oral anticoagulants and 2 anticoagulants were included: VKAs (especially warfarin), Dabigatran, Edoxaban, Rivaroxaban, Apixaban, and Aspirin, Clopidogrel. The results of the mesh meta-analysis showed that VKAs were superior to warfarin in reducing the risk of cognitive decline in patients with AF (OR = -1.19, 95% CI (-2.35, -0.06), P < .05) (Table 5). The top 3 drugs in terms of the probability of reducing the incidence of cognitive impairment in patients with AF with different oral anticoagulants were VKAs (87%), rivaroxaban (62.2%), and dabigatran (60.8%). CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this study, VKAs may be the best intervention measure for reducing the risk of cognitive decline in patients with AF. Owing to the limitations of this study, more high-quality randomized controlled trials with large sample sizes and multiple centers are required to provide more evidence.

In Vitro Simulation of the Fasted Gastric Conditions and Their Variability to Elucidate Contrasting Properties of the Marketed Dabigatran Etexilate Pellet-Filled Capsules and Loose Pellets.

Variability of the gastrointestinal tract is rarely reflected in in vitro test protocols but often turns out to be crucial for the oral dosage form performance. In this study, we present a generation method of dissolution profiles accounting for the variability of fasted gastric conditions. The workflow featured 20 biopredictive tests within the physiological variability. The experimental array was constructed with the use of the design of experiments, based on three parameters: gastric pH and timings of the intragastric stress event and gastric emptying. Then, the resulting dissolution profiles served as a training data set for the dissolution process modeling with the machine learning algorithms. This allowed us to generate individual dissolution profiles under a customizable gastric pH and motility patterns. For the first time ever, we used the method to successfully elucidate dissolution properties of two dosage forms: pellet-filled capsules and bare pellets of the marketed dabigatran etexilate product Pradaxa. We showed that the dissolution of capsules was triggered by mechanical stresses and thus was characterized by higher variability and a longer dissolution onset than observed for pellets. Hence, we proved the applicability of the method for the in vitro and in silico characterization of immediate-release dosage forms and, potentially, for the improvement of in vitro-in vivo extrapolation.