Bazedoxifene Inhibits Cell Viability, Colony-Forming Activity, and Cell Migration in Human Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells and Improves the Treatment Efficacy of Paclitaxel and Gemcitabine.

BACKGROUND: Bazedoxifene is a third-generation selective estrogen receptor modulator that inhibits the IL6/IL6R/GP130 signaling pathway by inhibiting IL6-induced homodimerization of GP130. Considering that the IL6/IL6R/GP130 signaling pathway is important in tumorigenesis and metastasis, bazedoxifene is thought to have an antitumor effect, which has been proven preliminarily in breast cancer and pancreatic cancer but has not yet been studied in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study is aimed at evaluating the antitumor effect of bazedoxifene in NSCLC. METHODS: A549 and H1299 NSCLC cell lines were employed and exposed to various concentrations of bazedoxifene, paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and their combinations for cell viability, colony formation, and wound healing assays to demonstrate the antitumor effect of bazedoxifene with or without paclitaxel or gemcitabine. RESULTS: MTT cell viability, colony formation, and wound healing assays showed that bazedoxifene was capable of inhibiting cell viability, colony formation, and cell migration in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, bazedoxifene was capable of working with paclitaxel or gemcitabine synergistically to inhibit cell viability, colony formation, and cell migration. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the potential antitumor effect of bazedoxifene and its ability to improve the treatment efficacy of paclitaxel and gemcitabine.

Insights into gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer: association with metabolic reprogramming and TP53 pathogenicity in patient derived xenografts.

BACKGROUND: With poor prognosis and high mortality, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal malignancies. Standard of care therapies for PDAC have included gemcitabine for the past three decades, although resistance often develops within weeks of chemotherapy initiation through an array of possible mechanisms. METHODS: We reanalyzed publicly available RNA-seq gene expression profiles of 28 PDAC patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models before and after a 21-day gemcitabine treatment using our validated analysis pipeline to identify molecular markers of intrinsic and acquired resistance. RESULTS: Using normalized RNA-seq quantification measurements, we first identified oxidative phosphorylation and interferon alpha pathways as the two most enriched cancer hallmark gene sets in the baseline gene expression profile associated with intrinsic gemcitabine resistance and sensitivity, respectively. Furthermore, we discovered strong correlations between drug-induced expression changes in glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation genes and response to gemcitabine, which suggests that these pathways may be associated with acquired gemcitabine resistance mechanisms. Thus, we developed prediction models using baseline gene expression profiles in those pathways and validated them in another dataset of 12 PDAC models from Novartis. We also developed prediction models based on drug-induced expression changes in genes from the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB)'s curated 50 cancer hallmark gene sets. Finally, pathogenic TP53 mutations correlated with treatment resistance. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that concurrent upregulation of both glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation pathways occurs in vivo in PDAC PDXs following gemcitabine treatment and that pathogenic TP53 status had association with gemcitabine resistance in these models. Our findings may elucidate the molecular basis for gemcitabine resistance and provide insights for effective drug combination in PDAC chemotherapy.

Characterization of Chemoresistance in Pancreatic Cancer: A Look at MDR-1 Polymorphisms and Expression in Cancer Cells and Patients.

Pancreatic malignancy is the fourth cause of cancer-related death in Western countries and is predicted to become the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality by 2030. The standard therapies (FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel) are not resolutive because this type of cancer is also characterized by a high chemoresistance, due in part to the activity of the ATP Binding Cassette (ABC) pumps accounting for the reduction in the intracellular concentration of the drugs. In this work, we analyze the occurrence of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the MDR-1 gene, in different pancreatic cancer cell lines, and in tissues from pancreatic cancer patients by DNA sequencing, as well as the expression levels of MDR-1 mRNA and protein, by qRT-PCR and Western Blot analysis. We found that gemcitabine-resistant cells, in conjunction with homozygosis of analyzed SNPs, showed high MDR-1 basal levels with further increases after gemcitabine treatment. Nevertheless, we did not observe in the human PDAC samples a correlation between the level of MDR-1 mRNA and protein expression and SNPs. Preliminary, we conclude that in our small cohort, these SNPs cannot be used as molecular markers for predicting the levels of MDR-1 mRNA/protein levels and drug responses in patients with PDAC.

Comparison of First-Line Chemotherapeutics and Validation of the EORTC Prognostic Index in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Retrospective Single-Centre Experience.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficiency of pemetrexed cisplatin in comparison with gemcitabine cisplatin and to validate the EORTC (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer) prognostic score in combination chemotherapy treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma. STUDY DESIGN:  An observational study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Oncology, Dicle University Hospital, Diyarbakir, Turkiye, from October 2000 to November 2017. METHODOLOGY: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients with EORTC score 0- were recruited. Factors affecting the prognosis of the disease and the effectiveness of first-line treatment were retrospectively analysed. EORTC prognostic score was calculated with a cut-off and survival analyses were used by the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank and univariable Cox regression tests were used to search for prognostic factors' impact on survival. RESULTS: Patients who received gemcitabine cisplatin treatment had a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 9 months, while those who received pemetrexed cisplatin therapy had a median PFS of 7 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 17 months in the gemcitabine cisplatin group and 18 months in the pemetrexed cisplatin group (p = 0.051). When the low-risk group was compared with the high-risk group, the median OS was found to be statistically significant (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: The EORTC prognostic score, which is used for prognostic prediction in the period when pemetrexed is not utilised in the treatment of MPM, accurately predicts prognosis subsequent to the administration of pemetrexed in treatment. In the context of first-line treatment, cisplatin in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in combination with pemetrexed demonstrated comparable efficacy with respect to both overall survival and progression-free survival. KEY WORDS: Chemotherapy, Mesothelioma, Prognosis, Gemcitabine, Progression-free survival.

Targeting Pancreatic Cancer with Novel Nicolaioidesin C Derivatives: Molecular Mechanism, In Vitro, and In Vivo Evaluations.

Pancreatic cancer, one of the deadliest cancers with the lowest 5-year survival rate, often develops resistance to gemcitabine-based chemotherapies. The hypovascular nature of pancreatic tumors forces cancer cells to adapt to nutrient-depleted tumor microenvironments. Conventional anticancer agents targeting rapidly dividing cancer cells under nutrient-rich conditions are largely ineffective against adapted pancreatic cancer cells. Thus, targeting cancer cells under nutrient starvation, termed the "antiausterity strategy", may be effective for pancreatic cancer. This study examined nicolaioidesin C (Nic-C) derivatives as antiausterity agents. Among the 32 derivatives, Nic-15 (4n) exhibited superior cytotoxicity against MIA PaCa-2 and PANC-1 pancreatic cancer cells, inhibited MIA PaCa-2 cell migration and colony formation, and modulated the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway, while reducing the ER stress markers induced by gemcitabine. Nic-15 was found to inhibit tumor growth and enhance the efficacy of gemcitabine in an in vivo xenograft model. Nic-15 in combination with gemcitabine may be an effective strategy for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Combining gemcitabine and MSC delivering soluble TRAIL to target pancreatic adenocarcinoma and its stroma.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) still has a poor response to therapies, partly due to their cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). Here, we investigate the synergistic impact of a combinatory approach between a known chemotherapy agent, such as gemcitabine (GEM), and gene-modified human mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) secreting the pro-apoptotic soluble (s)TRAIL (sTRAIL MSCs) on both PDAC cells and CAFs. The combo significantly impacts on PDAC survival in 2D and 3D models. In orthotopic xenograft models, GEM and sTRAIL MSCs induce tumor architecture shredding with a reduction of CK7- and CK8/18-positive cancer cells and the abrogation of spleen metastases. A cytotoxic effect on primary human CAFs is also observed along with an alteration of their transcriptome and a reduction of the related desmoplasia. Collectively, we demonstrate a promising therapeutic profile of combining GEM and sTRAIL MSCs to target both tumoral and stromal compartments in PDAC.

Synergistic Effects of 125I Seed Implantation Brachytherapy and Gemcitabine in Pancreatic Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Monotherapy consisting of radiotherapy or chemotherapy has limited efficacy in pancreatic tumors. This study aims to investigate whether the combination of 125I brachytherapy and gemcitabine (GEM) chemotherapy has a synergistic effect on pancreatic cancer (PC). METHODS: In vitro, PANC-1 cells in the exponential phase were treated with 125I radioactive seeds (6 Gy) and GEM (30 nM). Cell proliferation, apoptosis, and mitochondrial membrane potential were measured using the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay, Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining, and flow cytometry, respectively. In vivo, we examined the inhibitory effect of three different treatment regimens on tumor growth in mice when combined with 125I brachytherapy and GEM. Next, we investigated the effects of the optimal scheme among the three on the tumor microenvironment, tumor tissue morphology, tumor cell apoptosis, systemic inflammatory response, and levels of apoptosis-related proteins in the tumor. Changes in the tumor microenvironment and levels of apoptosis-related proteins were measured by Western blot. The extent of damage to tumor tissue morphology was assessed by Hematoxylin and Eosin (HE) staining. Tumor cell apoptosis was measured by TUNEL staining. Changes in inflammation-related factors were determined by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). RESULTS: The results of in vitro cell experiments demonstrated that the combination of 125I radioactive seeds (6 Gy) and GEM (30 nM) had a stronger inhibitory effect on PANC-1 cells than either alone (p < 0.05). In vivo, data showed that the GEM (after 3 d) + 125I treatment group had the strongest tumor inhibition effect on PC (p < 0.05). Western blot analysis showed that the combined treatment of 125I brachytherapy and GEM caused changes in the expression of collagen and connexin in the tumor microenvironment, promoted tumor cell apoptosis, upregulated the expression of pro-apoptotic proteins, and helped to restore pancreatic function (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Our research results suggest that the strategy of 125I seed implantation surgery in mice after 3 days of GEM treatment has a more pronounced synergistic effect on the treatment of PC.

Knockdown of TGF-ß in Pancreatic Cancer Helps Ameliorate Gemcitabine Resistance.

BACKGROUND: The TGF-ß gene is a gemcitabine (GEM) resistance gene; however, the mechanism by which it regulates GEM resistance in pancreatic cancer remains unclear. METHODS: The PANC-1 cell line was treated with GEM and then stimulated with TGF-ß. Subsequently, we constructed GEM-resistant pancreatic cancer cell lines, knocked down TGF-ß in these cell lines, and detected changes in the proliferation and apoptosis of drug-resistant cancer cells. In addition, the protein expression levels of KLF-4, GFI-1, and ZEB-1 were determined. The xenograft tumor models of nude mice were constructed by subcutaneously injecting GEM-resistant PANC-1 cells into mouse axilla. The tumors were removed, dissected, and weighed after 6 weeks. The protein levels of KLF-4, GFI-1, and ZEB-1 in tumor tissues were quantified. In addition, the percentage of M2 macrophages in tumor tissues was determined using flow cytometry. RESULTS: The protein levels of TGF-ß in pancreatic cancer cells were significantly decreased after GEM treatment. The protein expression of KLF-4 was downregulated, whereas the expressions of GFI-1 and ZEB-1 were upregulated after TGF-ß stimulation. Apoptosis increased and proliferation decreased after TGF-ß knockdown in GEM-resistant pancreatic cancer cells, moreover, silencing TGF-ß promoted the expression of Caspase 3 and Cleaved caspase 3. In addition, the protein expression of KLF-4 was upregulated, whereas the expressions of GFI-1 and ZEB-1 were downregulated. Further, the volume and weight of the transplanted tumor decreased after TGF-ß knockdown. The protein expression of KLF-4 was upregulated, whereas the expressions of GFI-1 and ZEB-1 were downregulated in tumor tissues. In addition, the percentage of M2 macrophages decreased in tumor tissues after TGF-ß knockdown. CONCLUSIONS: The knockdown of TGF-ß inhibits epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, suppresses the proliferation and promotes the apoptosis of drug-resistant cancer cells, and decreases the macrophage polarization to the M2 phenotype, consequently ameliorating GEM resistance in pancreatic cancer.

In Vitro and In Vivo Effects of Melatonin-Containing Combinations in Human Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has poor prognosis and high mortality rates. Therefore, it is necessary to identify new targets and therapeutic strategies to improve the prognosis of patients with PDAC. Integrative therapies are increasingly being used to boost the efficacy of the known anticancer therapeutic approaches. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of a novel combination of different potential anticancer molecules, melatonin (MLT), cannabidiol (CBD), and oxygen-ozone (O2/O3) to treat PDAC using in vitro and in vivo models of human PDAC. The effect of this combination was investigated in combination with gemcitabine (GEM), the most common chemotherapeutic drug used for PDAC treatment. The combination of MLT + CBD + O2/O3 was more effective than the individual treatments in inhibiting PDAC cell viability and proliferation, inducing cell death, and modulating the RAS pathway protein levels. Moreover, different combinations of treatments reduced tumor mass in the PDAC mouse model, thus promoting the effect of GEM. In conclusion, a mixture of MLT + CBD + O2/O3 could serve as a potential adjuvant therapeutic strategy for PDAC.

Trends in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic cancer (PC) has the poorest prognosis among digestive cancers; only 15-20% of cases are resectable at diagnosis. This review explores multidisciplinary treatments for advanced PC, emphasizing resectability classification and treatment strategies. For locally advanced unresectable PC, systemic chemotherapy using modified FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine with albumin-bound paclitaxel is standard, while the role of chemoradiation is debated. Induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation may be a promising therapy. Conversion surgery after initial chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy offers favorable survival, however criteria for conversion need further refinements. For metastatic PC, clinical trials using immune checkpoint inhibitors and molecular targeted therapies are ongoing. Multidisciplinary approaches and further research are crucial for optimizing treatment and improving outcomes for advanced PC.

Multicenter phase I/II trial of gemcitabine, oxaliplatin and nab-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The prognosis of patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) is still poor, and new strategies improving patients' outcome are needed. In our trial we investigated safety and activity of nab-paclitaxel in combination with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin as first-line systemic treatment for patients with advanced BTC. METHODS: In this investigator-initiated, multicenter, dose-escalation, single-arm phase I/II trial, patients were accrued into cohorts of 3 patients and dose escalation was performed following the standard 3 + 3 rule. Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients free from progression at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included safety and tolerability of the combination; progression-free survival (PFS); overall survival (OS); objective response rate (ORR); duration of response. RESULTS: Between July 2017 and December 2020, 67 patients were treated. Among the 10 patients in the phase I, no dose-limiting toxicity was observed, and dose level 2 was defined as recommended phase II dose for the phase II part. At data cutoff, the 6-month PFS rate was 49.1 % (95 % CI 40.8-57.5 %) with 28 patients out of 57 free from progression or death at 6 months. Median PFS was 6.3 months (95 % CI 3.6-10.1) and median OS was 12.4 months (95 % CI 8-23). ORR was 20.89 %. Most common grade 3 and grade 1-2 drug-related adverse events were neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy, respectively. CONCLUSION: Triple chemotherapy demonstrated a favorable safety profile. However, the study did not meet its primary endpoint. Future studies will clarify the benefit of chemotherapy combinations in different settings. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03943043.

Complete response to chemotherapy in a 6-year survivor of metastatic pancreatic cancer.

A woman in her 40s underwent evaluation for abdominal pain, jaundice and acholic stools and was diagnosed with metastatic pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. She was enrolled in a clinical trial investigating the benefits of ibrutinib with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine, and subsequently received modified FOLFIRINOX. Over the course of 6 years on chemotherapy, she experienced complete regression of the pancreatic and liver lesions, as well as normalisation of her tumour markers. She has been off chemotherapy for 6 months with no evidence of disease and normal tumour markers. Despite advances in chemotherapy and surgical options, metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma continues to carry a grim prognosis. This case report demonstrates a rare case of a long-term survivor of unresectable metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with chemotherapy alone.

Adjuvant 5-fluorouracil and portal vein infusion chemotherapy followed by gemcitabine for pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although adjuvant gemcitabine (GEM) monotherapy improves the overall survival (OS) of patients with resected pancreatic cancer, its efficacy requires further improvement. This multicenter, phase II study investigated the efficacy of adjuvant portal vein infusion (PVI) chemotherapy followed by GEM therapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. METHODS: 5-fluorouracil (250 mg/day) and heparin (2000 IU/day) PVI chemotherapy were combined with systemic administration of mitomycin C (4 mg; days 6, 13, 20, and 27) and cisplatin (10 mg; days 7, 14, 21, and 28) for 4 weeks (PI4W), followed by GEM (1000 mg/m2; days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks for 6 months). The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS) and the secondary endpoints were OS and treatment completion. RESULTS: Between November 2010 and August 2013, 53 patients who underwent complete resection were enrolled, including 30, 20, and 3 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomies and distal and total pancreatectomies, respectively. In total, 51 (96.2%) patients underwent R0 resection, of whom 3, 2, 12, 35, 0, and 1 had stages IA, IB, IIA, IIB, III, and IV cancer, respectively, and 47 (88.7%) patients completed PI4W. The median RFS was 22.0 months (1-, 3-, 5, and 10 years RFS: 64.9%, 38.1%, 38.1%, and 38.1%, respectively), whereas the median OS was 32.0 months (1-, 3-, 5, and 10 years OS:86.6%, 47.2%, 44.4%, and 44.4%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Treatment with PI4W followed by GEM for 6 months after surgery may be beneficial in patients undergoing curative resection of pancreatic cancer.

Serplulimab combined with gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel and stereotactic body radiotherapy as the first-line treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma in China: a multicentre, single-arm, phase II trial (ICSBR) protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remain a poor prognosis despite the development of chemotherapy. Although programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) blockade has shown great efficacy in various solid tumours, its application in treating PDAC is limited. Recent studies have indicated that chemotherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may improve the antitumour effect of PD-1 blockade in patients with PDAC. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined therapy comprising PD-1 blockade, gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy and SBRT for patients with metastatic PDAC. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, single-arm, prospective phase II clinical trial. Forty-three patients diagnosed with metastatic PDAC will be enrolled. The eligible patients will be intravenously administered 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine and 125 mg/m2 nab-paclitaxel on days 1 and 8 of the 21-day cycle. Serplulimab (200 mg) will be administered intravenously on day 1 of the 21-day cycle. Furthermore, during the second cycle, the patients will undergo SBRT with doses of 33 Gy in five fractions for primary lesions or doses of 24 Gy in three fractions for metastases. The primary endpoint is the 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate. The secondary endpoints overall survival, PFS, overall response rate, disease control rate, time to progression, duration of response, duration of disease control and safety. Moreover, this trial seeks to investigate biomarkers such as circulating tumour DNA and circulating hybrid cells in patients diagnosed with metastatic PDAC. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee on Biomedical Research, West China Hospital of Sichuan University. The study results will be presented at international conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2300073237.

Preliminary response to Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy drugs in patient with periampullary carcinoma: a report of one case and a literature review.

Periampullary carcinoma is a malignant gastrointestinal tumor originating from the head of the pancreas, distal bile duct, duodenum, or the ampulla of Vater. Currently, surgery remains the primary treatment option, yet the postoperative recurrence rate remains high. Chemotherapy is the main approach for controlling postoperative recurrence. Histologically, periampullary carcinoma is categorized into two types: intestinal (IN) and pancreaticobiliary (PB) subtype. Each subtype requires different therapeutic approaches, with the PB type primarily treated with gemcitabine and the IN type with 5-FU. Despite these options, patient outcomes are still unsatisfactory. In recent years, the feasibility of immunotherapy in tumor treatment has been increasingly evidenced, although research on its efficacy in periampullary carcinoma treatment is still limited. In this report, we present a case of a periampullary carcinoma patient who experienced recurrence and metastasis after undergoing radical pancreatoduodenectomy and receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy post-surgery. Through next-generation sequencing (NGS), we identified high expression levels of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) with a combined positive score (CPS) of 35, high tumor mutation burden (TMB-H), and high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) in this patient. Therefore, we implemented a combination therapy using Tislelizumab and chemotherapy. According to the latest follow-up, the tumors are effectively controlled. Our utilization of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy holds significant implication for the treatment of periampullary carcinoma.

Nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid, FOLFIRINOX, and S-1 as second-line treatment for unresectable pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel.

This study aimed to compare second-line treatment outcomes for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer previously treated with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) therapy. We conducted an integrated analysis of two retrospective studies included 318 patients receiving nanoliposomal irinotecan + 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (NFF) (n = 102), S-1 (n = 57), or FOLFIRINOX (n = 14) as second-line treatment. Median overall survival (OS) in the NFF group was 9.08 months, significantly better than S-1 (4.90 months, P = 0.002). FOLFIRINOX had a median OS of 4.77 months, not statistically different from NFF. Subgroup analyses of OS indicated NFF was generally superior, however, a statistical interaction was observed between the treatment regimen in serum Alb < 3.5 g/dL (P = 0.042) and serum CRP ≥ 0.3 mg/dL (P = 0.006). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.93 months for NFF, significantly better than S-1 (2.53 months, P = 0.024), while FOLFIRINOX had a comparable PFS (3.04 months, P = 0.948). Multivariate analysis identified the serum CRP, serum CA19-9, duration of first-line GnP therapy, and use (yes/no) of S-1 for second-line treatment as independent predictors for OS. This study concludes that second-line NFF therapy demonstrated a more favorable OS compared to S-1 therapy, however, it is still important to consider the patient background characteristics while selecting the most appropriate treatment.

Site-specific therapy guided by a 90-gene expression assay versus empirical chemotherapy in patients with cancer of unknown primary (Fudan CUP-001): a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Empirical chemotherapy remains the standard of care in patients with unfavourable cancer of unknown primary (CUP). Gene-expression profiling assays have been developed to identify the tissue of origin in patients with CUP; however, their clinical benefit has not yet been demonstrated. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of site-specific therapy directed by a 90-gene expression assay compared with empirical chemotherapy in patients with CUP. METHODS: This randomised controlled trial was conducted at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (Shanghai, China). We enrolled patients aged 18-75 years, with previously untreated CUP (histologically confirmed metastatic adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, poorly differentiated carcinoma, or poorly differentiated neoplasms) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2, who were not amenable to local radical treatment. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by the Pocock and Simon minimisation method to receive either site-specific therapy or empirical chemotherapy (taxane [175 mg/m2 by intravenous infusion on day 1] plus platinum [cisplatin 75 mg/m2 or carboplatin area under the curve 5 by intravenous infusion on day 1], or gemcitabine [1000 mg/m2 by intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8] plus platinum [same as above]). The minimisation factors were ECOG performance status and the extent of the disease. Clinicians and patients were not masked to interventions. The tumour origin in the site-specific therapy group was predicted by the 90-gene expression assay and treatments were administered accordingly. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. The trial has been completed and the analysis is final. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03278600). FINDINGS: Between Sept 18, 2017, and March 18, 2021, 182 patients (105 [58%] male, 77 [42%] female) were randomly assigned to receive site-specific therapy (n=91) or empirical chemotherapy (n=91). The five most commonly predicted tissues of origin in the site-specific therapy group were gastro-oesophagus (14 [15%]), lung (12 [13%]), ovary (11 [12%]), cervix (11 [12%]), and breast (nine [10%]). At the data cutoff date (April 30, 2023), median follow-up was 33·3 months (IQR 30·4-51·0) for the site-specific therapy group and 30·9 months (27·6-35·5) for the empirical chemotherapy group. Median progression-free survival was significantly longer with site-specific therapy than with empirical chemotherapy (9·6 months [95% CI 8·4-11·9] vs 6·6 months [5·5-7·9]; unadjusted hazard ratio 0·68 [95% CI 0·49-0·93]; p=0·017). Among the 167 patients who started planned treatment, 46 (56%) of 82 patients in the site-specific therapy group and 52 (61%) of 85 patients in the empirical chemotherapy group had grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events; the most frequent of these in the site-specific therapy and empirical chemotherapy groups were decreased neutrophil count (36 [44%] vs 42 [49%]), decreased white blood cell count (17 [21%] vs 26 [31%]), and anaemia (ten [12%] vs nine [11%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in five (6%) patients in the site-specific therapy group and two (2%) in the empirical chemotherapy group. No treatment-related deaths were observed. INTERPRETATION: This single-centre randomised trial showed that site-specific therapy guided by the 90-gene expression assay could improve progression-free survival compared with empirical chemotherapy among patients with previously untreated CUP. Site-specific prediction by the 90-gene expression assay might provide more disease information and expand the therapeutic armamentarium in these patients. FUNDING: Clinical Research Plan of Shanghai Hospital Development Center, Program for Shanghai Outstanding Academic Leader, and Shanghai Anticancer Association SOAR PROJECT. TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Establishment and characterization of a novel multidrug-resistant pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cell line, PDAC-X1.

Drug resistance remains a significant challenge in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. The development of drug-resistant cell lines is crucial to understanding the underlying mechanisms of resistance and developing novel drugs to improve clinical outcomes. Here, a novel pancreatic cancer cell line, PDAC-X1, derived from Chinese patients has been established. PDAC-X1 was characterized by the immune phenotype, biology, genetics, molecular characteristics, and tumorigenicity. In vitro analysis revealed that PDAC-X1 cells exhibited epithelial morphology and cell markers (CK7 and CK19), expressed cancer-associated markers (E-cadherin, Vimentin, Ki-67, CEA, CA19-9), and produced pancreatic cancer-like organs in suspension culture. In vivo analysis showed that PDAC-X1 cells maintained tumorigenicity with a 100% tumor formation rate. This cell line exhibited a complex karyotype, dominated by subtriploid karyotypes. In addition, PDAC-X1 cells exhibited intrinsic multidrug resistance to multiple drugs, including gemcitabine, paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin. In conclusion, the PDAC-X1 cell line has been established and characterized, representing a useful and valuable preclinical model to study the underlying mechanisms of drug resistance and develop novel drug therapeutics to improve patient outcomes.

Concurrent chemoradiation with low-dose and long-duration weekly infusion of gemcitabine in unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN).

BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy now represents the standard of care in locally advanced unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, and the administration of cisplatin in triweekly or weekly schedules is the most commonly used chemotherapeutic agent. However, the chemotherapeutic agent and its scheduling with radiation is still an area of investigation with safer toxicity profile and better response rates. Gemcitabine is a potent radiosensitizer, and non-cytotoxic concentration results in decreased systemic toxicity while maintaining radiosensitization properties. Furthermore, data are emerging for low-dose and long-duration infusion where this strategy is found to be effective and a safe alternative to standard brief infusion. Based on these two strategies, that is, non-cytotoxic concentration with long duration, we have explored the unique possibility of further lowering the toxicity profile without compromising the efficacy. METHOD: Eligible patients of locally advanced unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck underwent radiation treatment with concurrent gemcitabine. A total dose of 70 Gy in 35 fractions over a period of seven weeks with conventional fractionation schedule was delivered with cord off after 44 Gy. Concurrent gemcitabine was administered intravenously for over two hours once a week, 1-2 h before radiation and for seven consecutive weeks at 50 mg/m2. RESULT: Fifty-two patients was enrolled in this study, out of which 41 completed the treatment. Fifty-nine percent completed treatment within seven weeks. Sixty-four percent were found to have received more than five cycles. Mean follow-up of patients was found to be 4.9 months. Sixty-eight percent had complete response. Stage III patients achieved more complete response compared to stage IV. There was no site-wise difference in achieving complete response. Patients who have received less than five chemo cycles or completed the treatment in more than seven weeks had less complete response. Sixty-one percent had severe mucositis while 39% developed mild/moderate mucositis. Considering skin toxicity, 80% were found to have mild/moderate skin toxicity, while only 20% suffered from severe grades of skin toxicity. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine in low-dose and long-duration infusion is a potent radiosensitizer with safer hematological toxicity and manageable local toxicities.