Ocorrência de eventos adversos após o uso da vacina adsorvida difteria, tétano e pertussis (acelular) - dTpa -, São Paulo, SP, 2015-2016 / Aparecimiento de eventos adversos después del uso de la vacuna adsorbida difteria, tétanos y tosferina (acelular) - dTpa -, São Paulo, SP, Brasil, 2015-2016 / Adverse event occurrence following use of tetanus, diphtheria and acellular pertussis adsorbed vaccine - Tdap -, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 2015-2016

Objetivo: descrever a ocorrência de eventos adversos pós-vacinação (EAPV) com a vacina dTpa durante a gestação. Métodos: estudo descritivo, com dados de relatos das participantes de estudo de efetividade e imunogenicidade realizado em dois hospitais de São Paulo, SP, Brasil, entre 2015 e 2016. Resultados: das 201 mães incluídas no estudo, 48 (23,9%) apresentaram pelo menos um EAPV; foram identificados 60 sintomas relacionados ao uso da dTpa - dor (22,4%), inchaço (2,5%), febre (1,5%), sono (1,0%), vermelhidão (0,5%), vômito (0,5%), dor de cabeça (0,5%), reação local (0,5%) e cansaço (0,5%); não foram registrados eventos adversos raros, muito raros ou extremamente raros; todos os eventos foram considerados esperados e estão descritos em bula; todos tiveram desfecho para cura sem sequelas. Conclusão: a dTpa, na forma adotada pelo Programa Nacional de Imunizações (PNI), é segura; não foram identificados eventos adversos inesperados entre as gestantes imunizadas com a vacina.

Objetivo: describir el aparecimiento de eventos adversos posvacunación (EAPV) con la vacuna dTpa durante el embarazo. Métodos: estudio descriptivo con datos de relatos de las participantes del estudio de efectividad e inmunogenicidad realizado en dos hospitales de São Paulo, SP, Brasil, entre 2015 y 2106. Resultados: de las 201 madres del estudio, 48 (23,9%) tuvieron al menos un EAPV; se identificaron 60 síntomas relacionados al uso de dTpa - dolor (22.4%), hinchazón (2.5%), fiebre (1.5%), somnolencia (1.0%), enrojecimiento (0.5%), vómitos (0.5 %), dolor de cabeza (0.5%), reacción local (0.5%) y cansancio (0.5%) -; no se informaron eventos adversos raros, muy raros o extremadamente raros; todos los eventos se consideraron esperados y se describen en el prospecto; todos tuvieron resultados curativos sin secuelas. Conclusión: el estudio mostró que la vacuna dTpa utilizada por el Programa Nacional de Inmunización (PNI) es segura y no se identificaron eventos adversos inesperados entre las mujeres embarazadas vacunadas.

Objective: to describe occurrence of adverse events following immunization (AEFI) with Tdap vaccine during pregnancy. Methods: this was a descriptive study using data from reports by participants in an effectiveness and immunogenicity study conducted in two hospitals in São Paulo, SP, Brazil, from 2015 to 2016. Results: of the 201 mothers included in the study, 48 (23.9%) had at least one AEFI; 60 symptoms related to Tdap use were identified - pain (22.4%), swelling (2.5%), fever (1.5%), somnolence (1.0%), redness (0.5%), vomiting (0.5%), headache (0.5%), local reaction (0.5%), and fatigue (0.5%); no rare, very rare, or extremely rare adverse events were reported; all events were considered to be expected, as they are described in the vaccine package insert; outcome of all events was recovery without sequelae. Conclusion: Tdap vaccine in the form adopted by the National Immunization Program is safe; no unexpected adverse events were identified among vaccinated pregnant women.

Antibody levels to tetanus, diphtheria, measles and varicella in patients with primary immunodeficiency undergoing intravenous immunoglobulin therapy: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with antibody deficiencies depend on the presence of a variety of antibody specificities in intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) to ensure continued protection against pathogens. Few studies have examined levels of antibodies to specific pathogens in IVIG preparations and little is known about the specific antibody levels in patients under regular IVIG treatment. The current study determined the range of antibodies to tetanus, diphtheria, measles and varicella in IVIG products and the levels of these antibodies in patients undergoing IVIG treatment. METHODS: We selected 21 patients with primary antibody deficiencies who were receiving regular therapy with IVIG. Over a period of one year, we collected four blood samples from each patient (every 3 months), immediately before immunoglobulin infusion. We also collected samples from the IVIG preparation the patients received the month prior to blood collection. Antibody levels to tetanus, diphtheria, measles and varicella virus were measured in plasma and IVIG samples. Total IgG levels were determined in plasma samples. RESULTS: Antibody levels to tetanus, diphtheria, varicella virus and measles showed considerable variation in different IVIG lots, but they were similar when compared between commercial preparations. All patients presented with protective levels of antibodies specific for tetanus, measles and varicella. Some patients had suboptimal diphtheria antibody levels. There was a significant correlation between serum and IVIG antibodies to all pathogens, except tetanus. There was a significant correlation between diphtheria and varicella antibodies with total IgG levels, but there was no significant correlation with antibodies to tetanus or measles. CONCLUSIONS: The study confirmed the variation in specific antibody levels between batches of the same brand of IVIG. Apart from the most common infections to which these patients are susceptible, health care providers must be aware of other vaccine preventable diseases, which still exist globally.

Impaired humoral response to vaccines among HIV-exposed uninfected infants.

Little is known about the vaccine protective response for infants born from HIV-infected mothers. We evaluated the antibody response to hepatitis B, tetanus, and diphtheria vaccine in vertically HIV-exposed uninfected infants and compared them to those of control infants not exposed to the virus. The quantitative determination of specific neutralizing antibodies against hepatitis B, diphtheria, and tetanus were performed blindly on serum samples. The results showed that 6.7% of the HIV-exposed uninfected individuals were nonresponders to hepatitis B vaccine (anti-HBs titer, <10 mIU/ml), and 64.4% were very good responders (anti-HBs titer, ≥1,000 mIU/ml), whereas only 3.6% of the nonexposed infants were nonresponders (χ(2)=10.93; 1 df). The HIV-exposed uninfected infants showed protective titers for diphtheria and tetanus but lower geometric mean anti-tetanus titers compared to those of the HIV-unexposed infants. Our data point to the necessity of evaluating vaccine immune responses in these children and reinforced that alterations in lymphocyte numbers and functions reported for newborns from HIV-infected mothers interfere with the vaccine response.

Concurrent diphtheria and infectious mononucleosis: difficulties for management, investigation and control of diphtheria in developing countries.

We report a case of concurrent diphtheria and infectious mononucleosis in an 11-year-old Brazilian child. Two days after specific treatment for diphtheria was started the patient was discharged following clinical recovery. This case highlights the difficulties in the clinical diagnosis of diphtheria in partially immunized individuals, and for the management and control of diphtheria in developing countries.

Diphtheria toxin IgG levels in military and civilian blood donors in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Serologic data on diseases that are preventable by vaccines are necessary to evaluate the success of immunization programs and to identify susceptible subgroups. In the present study, we determined serum IgG levels against diphtheria toxin of military and civilian blood donors (N = 75; 69.3 percent males and 30.7 percent females) aged 18-64 years, from the Brazilian Army Biology Institute, Rio de Janeiro, using a commercial diphtheria kit (Diphtheria IgG ELISA; IBL, Germany). Most (63 percent) unprotected military donors were from the older age group of 41 to 64 years. In contrast, the majority (71 percent) of young military donors (18 to 30 years) were fully protected. About half of the military donors aged 31 to 40 years were protected against diphtheria. Among the civilians, about 50 percent of persons aged 18 to 30 years and 31 to 40 years had protective antibody levels against diphtheria as also did 64 percent of individuals aged 41 to 64 years. All civilians had a similar antibody response (geometric mean = 0.55 IU/mL) independent of age group. Military donors aged 18-30 years had higher IgG levels (geometric mean = 0.82 IU/mL) than military donors of 41-64 years (geometric mean = 0.51 IU/mL; P > 0.05). In conclusion, the existence of a considerable proportion of susceptible adults supports the position that reliable data on the immune status of the population should be maintained routinely and emphasizes the importance of adequate immunization during adulthood.

Diphtheria toxin IgG levels in military and civilian blood donors in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Serologic data on diseases that are preventable by vaccines are necessary to evaluate the success of immunization programs and to identify susceptible subgroups. In the present study, we determined serum IgG levels against diphtheria toxin of military and civilian blood donors (N = 75; 69.3% males and 30.7% females) aged 18-64 years, from the Brazilian Army Biology Institute, Rio de Janeiro, using a commercial diphtheria kit (Diphtheria IgG ELISA; IBL, Germany). Most (63%) unprotected military donors were from the older age group of 41 to 64 years. In contrast, the majority (71%) of young military donors (18 to 30 years) were fully protected. About half of the military donors aged 31 to 40 years were protected against diphtheria. Among the civilians, about 50% of persons aged 18 to 30 years and 31 to 40 years had protective antibody levels against diphtheria as also did 64% of individuals aged 41 to 64 years. All civilians had a similar antibody response (geometric mean = 0.55 IU/mL) independent of age group. Military donors aged 18-30 years had higher IgG levels (geometric mean = 0.82 IU/mL) than military donors of 41-64 years (geometric mean = 0.51 IU/mL; P > 0.05). In conclusion, the existence of a considerable proportion of susceptible adults supports the position that reliable data on the immune status of the population should be maintained routinely and emphasizes the importance of adequate immunization during adulthood.

Predictive value of immunization records and risk factors for immunization failure in internationally adopted children.

OBJECTIVES: To measure the predictive value of immunization records for protective immunity and identify risk factors for immunization failure. DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional study, 2001-2006. SETTING: International Adoption Clinic, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 465 international adoptees presenting within 180 days of arrival. Main Exposure Immunization records of vaccines given. OUTCOME MEASURES: Protective immunity to polio, hepatitis B, tetanus, diphtheria, and measles. RESULTS: Vaccination records were available for 397 (85.4%) adoptees (mean age, 19.4 months; 65.2% girls). Most children came from Russia (41.7%), China (20.9%), and Guatemala (15.7%). Acute or chronic malnutrition was present in 5.5% and 15.4% of adoptees, respectively. Preadoptive settings were institutional (52%), community-based (14%), or both (34%). Of adoptees with 3 or more tetanus (n = 203) or 3 or more diphtheria (n = 205) vaccinations, 87.2% and 94.6% had protective immunity, respectively. Of adoptees with 3 or more polio vaccinations (n = 216), protective immunity was present in 58.3%, 82.4%, and 51.9% for polio types 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Of adoptees with 2 or more hepatitis B vaccinations (n = 170), 94.1% had protective immunity. A total of 80.8% of adoptees with measles vaccination (n = 99) had protective immunity. Children from China were less likely to have protective immunity than children from Russia (odds ratio, 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.66). Nutritional status had no predictive effect. CONCLUSIONS: The predictive value of immunization records in international adoptees is limited and varies between birth countries. Immunization records should not be accepted as evidence of protective immunity. Parents should be well informed and supported to choose between revaccination or vaccination, based on serologic testing.

Diphtheria, tetanus, and varicella immunity in health care workers in neonatal units.

BACKGROUND: Susceptible health care workers are at risk of acquiring and transmitting vaccine-preventable diseases to or from patients. The objective of this study was to assess antibody levels against diphtheria, tetanus, and varicella in healthcare workers. METHODS: Antibody levels against diphtheria, tetanus, and varicella were measured in health care professionals in 2 neonatal units at the Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil. RESULTS: Between September and November 2002, 215 of 222 (96.8%) health care workers were studied. Of those, 122 (56.7%) gave oral information regarding their vaccination status against diphtheria and tetanus and only 9 (4.2%) had their vaccination cards. Geometric mean antibody levels against diphtheria, tetanus, and varicella were 0.89 IU/mL (95%CI, 0.73 to 1.08), 0.86 IU/mL (95%CI, 0.68 to 1.07) and 1.10 IU/mL (95%CI, 0.98 to 1.24), respectively. Using internationally accepted definitions, 200 (93.0%) and 182 (84.7%) individuals had full protection against diphtheria and tetanus, respectively. Regarding varicella, 213 (99.1%) individuals were immune and 2 (0.9%) had equivocal immunity against varicella. Of 65 (30.2%) individuals without previous history of the illness, 63 (96.9%) were immune against varicella zoster virus. CONCLUSIONS: Based on serologic screening, most professionals were immune to diphtheria, tetanus, and varicella. Absence of previous history of varicella was an unreliable identifier of susceptibility to varicella zoster virus in the health care workers studied.

Prevalence of diphtheria and tetanus antibodies and circulation of Corynebacterium diphtheriae in São Paulo, Brazil

The introduction of routine vaccination against tetanus and diphtheria in Brazil has decreased the incidence and changed the epidemiology of both diseases. We then investigated the prevalence of Corynebacterium diphtheriae carrier status and diphtheria and tetanus immunity in São Paulo, Brazil. From November 2001 to March 2003, 374 individuals were tested for the presence of C. diphtheriae in the naso-oropharynx and of serum diphtheria and tetanus antibodies. Participants were all healthy individuals without acute or chronic pathologies and they were stratified by age as follows: 0-12 months and 1-4, 5-9, 10-14, 15-24, 25-39, 40-59, and ³60 years. Antibodies were assessed using a double-antigen ELISA. C. diphtheriae species were identified by biochemical analysis and toxigenicity was assessed by the Elek test. For diphtheria, full protection (antibodies ³0.1 IU/mL) was present in 84 percent of the individuals, 15 percent had basic protection (antibodies ³0.01 and <0.1 IU/mL) and 1 percent were susceptible (antibodies <0.01 IU/mL). Full tetanus protection (antibodies ³0.1 IU/mL) was present in 79 percent of the participants, 18 percent had basic protection (antibodies ³0.01 and <0.1 IU/mL) and 3 percent were susceptible (antibodies <0.01 IU/mL). The geometric mean of diphtheria and tetanus antibodies reached the highest values at 5-9 years and decreased until the 40-59-year age range, increasing again in individuals over 60 years. Three participants (0.8 percent) were carriers of C. diphtheriae, all non-toxigenic strains. The present results demonstrate the clear need of periodic booster for tetanus and diphtheria vaccine in adolescents and adults after primary immunization in childhood.

Prevalence of diphtheria and tetanus antibodies and circulation of Corynebacterium diphtheriae in São Paulo, Brazil.

The introduction of routine vaccination against tetanus and diphtheria in Brazil has decreased the incidence and changed the epidemiology of both diseases. We then investigated the prevalence of Corynebacterium diphtheriae carrier status and diphtheria and tetanus immunity in São Paulo, Brazil. From November 2001 to March 2003, 374 individuals were tested for the presence of C. diphtheriae in the naso-oropharynx and of serum diphtheria and tetanus antibodies. Participants were all healthy individuals without acute or chronic pathologies and they were stratified by age as follows: 0-12 months and 1-4, 5-9, 10-14, 15-24, 25-39, 40-59, and > or =60 years. Antibodies were assessed using a double-antigen ELISA. C. diphtheriae species were identified by biochemical analysis and toxigenicity was assessed by the Elek test. For diphtheria, full protection (antibodies > or =0.1 IU/mL) was present in 84% of the individuals, 15% had basic protection (antibodies > or =0.01 and <0.1 IU/mL) and 1% were susceptible (antibodies <0.01 IU/mL). Full tetanus protection (antibodies > or =0.1 IU/mL) was present in 79% of the participants, 18% had basic protection (antibodies > or =0.01 and <0.1 IU/mL) and 3% were susceptible (antibodies <0.01 IU/mL). The geometric mean of diphtheria and tetanus antibodies reached the highest values at 5-9 years and decreased until the 40-59-year age range, increasing again in individuals over 60 years. Three participants (0.8%) were carriers of C. diphtheriae, all non-toxigenic strains. The present results demonstrate the clear need of periodic booster for tetanus and diphtheria vaccine in adolescents and adults after primary immunization in childhood.

Tetanus and diphtheria immunity in adolescents from São Paulo, Brazil.

Tetanus and diphtheria vaccines are of special concern in adolescents because boosters are necessary for adequate maintenance of protection and are often omitted. We assessed serum levels of tetanus and diphtheria antibodies in adolescents and their association with vaccination status. From May to October 2001, we evaluated the vaccination records of 208 adolescents aged 10 to 20 years in São Paulo, Brazil. Antibodies to tetanus and diphtheria were detected using double-antigen ELISA and vaccination records were analyzed according to the guidelines of the Brazilian National Immunization Program. All adolescents had received complete primary vaccinations against tetanus and diphtheria, but 23.1% of them had not received a booster dose in the last 10 years. All adolescents were immune to tetanus and 88.9% were fully protected (antibodies (3)0.1 IU/mL). One individual (0.5%) was non-immune to diphtheria and 86% were fully protected against the disease. Adolescents with up-to-date vaccination records had higher antibody levels than those with not up-to-date records for tetanus (0.763 vs 0.239 IU/mL, t-test: P < 0.0001) and diphtheria (0.366 vs 0.233 IU/mL, t-test: P = 0.014). Full immunity against tetanus (antibodies (3)0.1 IU/mL) was higher among individuals with up-to-date vaccination (93.1%) when compared to those with not up-to-date records (75%, Fisher's exact test: P = 0.001). All adolescents had received basic immunization in childhood and were protected against tetanus and diphtheria. However, these data indicate that more emphasis should be placed on the tetanus-diphtheria booster in order to avoid a decay in antibody levels.

Tetanus and diphtheria immunity in adolescents from São Paulo, Brazil

Tetanus and diphtheria vaccines are of special concern in adolescents because boosters are necessary for adequate maintenance of protection and are often omitted. We assessed serum levels of tetanus and diphtheria antibodies in adolescents and their association with vaccination status. From May to October 2001, we evaluated the vaccination records of 208 adolescents aged 10 to 20 years in São Paulo, Brazil. Antibodies to tetanus and diphtheria were detected using double-antigen ELISA and vaccination records were analyzed according to the guidelines of the Brazilian National Immunization Program. All adolescents had received complete primary vaccinations against tetanus and diphtheria, but 23.1 percent of them had not received a booster dose in the last 10 years. All adolescents were immune to tetanus and 88.9 percent were fully protected (antibodies ³0.1 IU/mL). One individual (0.5 percent) was non-immune to diphtheria and 86 percent were fully protected against the disease. Adolescents with up-to-date vaccination records had higher antibody levels than those with not up-to-date records for tetanus (0.763 vs 0.239 IU/mL, t-test: P < 0.0001) and diphtheria (0.366 vs 0.233 IU/mL, t-test: P = 0.014). Full immunity against tetanus (antibodies ³0.1 IU/mL) was higher among individuals with up-to-date vaccination (93.1 percent) when compared to those with not up-to-date records (75 percent, Fisher's exact test: P = 0.001). All adolescents had received basic immunization in childhood and were protected against tetanus and diphtheria. However, these data indicate that more emphasis should be placed on the tetanus-diphtheria booster in order to avoid a decay in antibody levels.

Diphtheria-neutralizing antibody levels in healthy adults from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

In Brazil, until 2004, the immunization policy against diphtheria involved childhood vaccination with no official routine booster dose administered after 15 years of age. This study assessed functional antibody levels against diphtheria among blood donors. A total of 140 blood samples were collected, and diphtheria antitoxin levels were evaluated by Vero cell neutralization test. The mean age of the population was 34 years old (range: 18-61 years); 37.8% females and 62.2% males. Overall, 30.7% (95%, CI: 23.4-38.7) individuals presented neutralizing antitoxin antibody titers < 0.01 IU/ml; 42.1% (95%, CI: 34.1-50.4) showed values between 0.01-0.09 IU/ml and, 27.1% (95%, CI: 20.2-34.9) had (3) 0.1 IU/ml. In the subgroup of individuals with history of diphtheria immunization during childhood (85%), a number of 28.5% showed unprotective levels of circulating neutralizing antibody (< 0.01 IU/ml). Despite the continuous progress of immunization programs directed to Brazilian population, currently healthy adults remain susceptible to diphtheria.

Diphtheria-neutralizing antibody levels in healthy adults from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

In Brazil, until 2004, the immunization policy against diphtheria involved childhood vaccination with no official routine booster dose administered after 15 years of age. This study assessed functional antibody levels against diphtheria among blood donors. A total of 140 blood samples were collected, and diphtheria antitoxin levels were evaluated by Vero cell neutralization test. The mean age of the population was 34 years old (range: 18-61 years); 37.8 percent females and 62.2 percent males. Overall, 30.7 percent (95 percent, CI: 23.4-38.7) individuals presented neutralizing antitoxin antibody titers < 0.01 IU/ml; 42.1 percent (95 percent, CI: 34.1-50.4) showed values between 0.01-0.09 IU/ml and, 27.1 percent (95 percent, CI: 20.2-34.9) had ³ 0.1 IU/ml. In the subgroup of individuals with history of diphtheria immunization during childhood (85 percent), a number of 28.5 percent showed unprotective levels of circulating neutralizing antibody (< 0.01 IU/ml). Despite the continuous progress of immunization programs directed to Brazilian population, currently healthy adults remain susceptible to diphtheria.

Effect of a single tetanus-diphtheria vaccine dose on the immunity of elderly people in São Paulo, Brazil.

Epidemiological data regarding tetanus and diphtheria immunity in elderly people in Brazil are scarce. During the First National Immunization Campaign for the Elderly in Brazil in April 1999, 98 individuals (median age: 84 years) received one tetanus-dyphtheria (Td) vaccine dose (Butantan Institute, lot number 9808079/G). Inclusion criteria were elderly individuals without a history of severe immunosuppressive disease, acute infectious disease or use of immunomodulators. Blood samples were collected immediately before the vaccine and 30 days later. Serum was separated and stored at -20 degrees C until analysis. Tetanus and diphtheria antibodies were measured by the double-antigen ELISA test. Tetanus and diphtheria antibody concentrations lower than 0.01 IU/mL were considered to indicate the absence of protection, between 0.01 and 0.09 IU/mL were considered to indicate basic immunity, and values of 0.1 IU/mL or higher were considered to indicate full protection. Before vaccination, 18% of the individuals were susceptible to diphtheria and 94% were susceptible to tetanus. After one Td dose, 78% became fully immune to diphtheria, 13% attained basic immunity, and 9% were still susceptible to the disease. In contrast, 79% remained susceptible to tetanus, 4% had basic immunity and 17% were fully immune. Although one Td dose increases immunity to diphtheria in many elderly people who live in Brazil, a complete vaccination series appears to be necessary for the prevention of tetanus.

Effect of a single tetanus-diphtheria vaccine dose on the immunity of elderly people in São Paulo, Brazil

Epidemiological data regarding tetanus and diphtheria immunity in elderly people in Brazil are scarce. During the First National Immunization Campaign for the Elderly in Brazil in April 1999, 98 individuals (median age: 84 years) received one tetanus-dyphtheria (Td) vaccine dose (Butantan Institute, lot number 9808079/G). Inclusion criteria were elderly individuals without a history of severe immunosuppressive disease, acute infectious disease or use of immunomodulators. Blood samples were collected immediately before the vaccine and 30 days later. Serum was separated and stored at -20°C until analysis. Tetanus and diphtheria antibodies were measured by the double-antigen ELISA test. Tetanus and diphtheria antibody concentrations lower than 0.01 IU/mL were considered to indicate the absence of protection, between 0.01 and 0.09 IU/mL were considered to indicate basic immunity, and values of 0.1 IU/mL or higher were considered to indicate full protection. Before vaccination, 18 percent of the individuals were susceptible to diphtheria and 94 percent were susceptible to tetanus. After one Td dose, 78 percent became fully immune to diphtheria, 13 percent attained basic immunity, and 9 percent were still susceptible to the disease. In contrast, 79 percent remained susceptible to tetanus, 4 percent had basic immunity and 17 percent were fully immune. Although one Td dose increases immunity to diphtheria in many elderly people who live in Brazil, a complete vaccination series appears to be necessary for the prevention of tetanus.

Prevalence of IgG diphtheria antitoxin in blood donors in Rio de Janeiro.

The lack of information on the immunity of adults in Brazil against diphtheria prompted us to analyse sera from 234 blood donors aged 18-61 years (30.3% females and 69.7% males). IgG diphtheria antitoxin levels determined by means of an ELISA, validated by toxin neutralization test in Vero cells, showed that 30.7% (95% CI 25.0-37.1) of the population was fully protected (>or=1 IU/ml). The highest percentage of subjects fully protected was in the 31-40 years age group. Most of the subjects with uncertain or no protection (<1 IU/ml) were found in the 18-30 years age group (43.8%, OR 2.18, P=0.01). Antitoxin levels were not influenced by the increase in age. Males were more protected than females (80.5%, OR 0.44, P=0.01). The prevalence of 30% of individuals fully protected against diphtheria in blood donors in Rio de Janeiro supports the fact that immunity to diphtheria among healthy Brazilian adults is inadequate. To avoid diphtheria epidemics in the future the immunity among adults should be raised in the coming years.

Tetanus and diphtheria antibodies and response to a booster dose in Brazilian HIV-1-infected women.

Tetanus and diphtheria (Td) antibodies were studied in HIV-1-infected women during puerperium. HIV group (n=61) was compared with Control group (n=101). Twenty-one women from HIV and 13 from Control group who had antibody levels lower than 0.1 IU/mL received a booster with Td vaccine. Antibodies were assessed by double antigen ELISA. Mean tetanus and diphtheria antibody levels from HIV group were lower than those from Control group. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that tetanus and diphtheria antibody levels were decreased by HIV-1-infection, and that was independent of the reduction due to the time interval between last booster and antibody assessment. After a booster dose, both groups had an increase in mean tetanus and diphtheria antibody levels, but in Control group the levels were higher than in HIV group.

Umbilical cord blood transplantation in Wiskott Aldrich syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To report the use of umbilical cord blood (UCB) stem cell transplantation in Wiskott Aldrich syndrome (WAS) when a matched sibling donor was unavailable. METHODS: Three children with WAS received unrelated umbilical cord blood stem cell transplantation after a preparative regimen for the treatment of combined immunodeficiency diseases. The patients ranged in age from 1.9 to 7.9 years. The cord blood units were 4/6 HLA antigen matches in 2 children and 5/6 in 1 child, with molecular HLA-DR match in all 3 children. RESULTS: The time for neutrophil engraftment (ANC >500/mm(3)) was 11 to 16 days, and the average time for platelet engraftment was 36 to 49 days. One patient had no evidence of GvHD, 1 patient grade I, and 1 patient grade II. No patient had chronic GvHD. The patient with grade II GvHD also had gut involvement. Immunologic reconstitution demonstrated that cord blood stem cell transplantation resulted in consistent and stable T-, B-, and NK-cell development. Functional B-cell antibody responses revealed that 2 of the patients in whom IVIG has been discontinued had low detectable antibody responses to tetanus and diphtheria toxoid immunizations at 18 to 24 months after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Unrelated umbilical donor cord blood is an alternative source of stem cells for transplantation in children with WAS when a suitable HLA-matched donor is not available. Benefits of UCB include rapid and reliable recovery of immune function, low risk of GvHD, and low viral transmission rate.

Primary vaccination of infants with diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B virus- inactivated polio virus and Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccines given as either separate or mixed injections.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this open, multicenter, randomized trial was to evaluate the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a candidate combined diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B virus-inactivated polio virus (DTaP-HBV-IPV) vaccine when given as either a mixed or as separate concomitant injections with Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 359 subjects were randomized to receive either DTaP-HBV-IPV/Hib (mixed administration - 180 subjects) or DTaP-HBV-IPV + Hib (separate administration in opposite limbs - 179 subjects) at 2, 3, and 4 months of age. RESULTS: After vaccination, seroprotective antibody concentrations against diphtheria, tetanus, hepatitis B, and polio viruses and a high (> or = 97%) pertussis vaccine response were seen in almost all study participants. All subjects except one in the mixed administration group had postvaccination Hib anti-PRP antibody concentrations > or = 0.15 microg/mL. Of subjects in the mixed and separate group, 77.2% (geometric mean antibody concentration, 2. 62 microg/mL) and 88.6% (geometric mean antibody concentration, 4.45 microg/mL) had Hib anti-PRP concentrations > or = 1 microg/mL, respectively. The addition of the Hib component to the 5-component vaccine did not increase the incidence of local or general reactions. CONCLUSION: Both administrations of the candidate vaccine were found to be safe, immunogenic, and well tolerated. Although anti-PRP geometric mean antibody concentrations and the percent of subjects achieving the 1 microg/mL seroprotective level were lower after the mixed administration, they were in the range seen with monovalent Hib vaccines or with other DTaP-based/Hib combinations licensed in some European countries. Therefore both administrations have the potential to simplify childhood immunization.